DOCSLIB.ORG

Moths of Riccarton Bush

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Moths of Riccarton Bush 22 Denise Ford Moths of Riccarton Bush Denise E. Ford Email:[email protected] I am a postgraduate student at Lincoln University with a strong interest in native invertebrate communities within urban settings. I am embarking on a project to collect information on Lepidoptera in Riccarton Bush. Riccarton Bush has 27 families of Lepidoptera and my particular interest is in the family Geometridae (looper moths), focusing on 20 species from this family. Riccarton Bush in the suburb of Riccarton, Christchurch is a small remnant (7.8 ha) of what was once extensive lowland floodplain forest on the Canterbury Plains. When the Pilgrims arrived in 1850 they found forests that had already been greatly depleted by flood and fire. By 1860 little remained of these forests, with the majority of trees having been felled for timber. Through the wishes and actions of the Deans family, the area we now know as Riccarton Bush was preserved. In 1914, the family gifted 6.4 ha of the Bush to the people of Christchurch with one of the conditions being, “That the property be named ‘Riccarton Bush’ and be used and kept for all time for the preservation and cultivation of trees and plants indigenous to New Zealand”. In 1947, the remaining forest (1.4 ha), Riccarton House and its gardens were purchased by the Christchurch City Council. Riccarton Bush has played an important role in the history of New Zealand entomology. A number of native insects were first collected and named from Riccarton Bush. Over the last 150 years, many famous entomologists have studied the insects and spiders of Riccarton Bush. The Lepidoptera have been particularly well studied; of the families found in New Zealand, 70% have been collected in the Bush. One of the first collections was of a plume moth, Pterophorus monospilalis, in 1859 which is now in the Fereday collection held in the Canterbury Museum. For my list of moths I have gathered information from chapter 19 “Moths and Butterflies” in Riccarton Bush: Putaringamotu edited by Brian The Weta 45:22-24 23 Molloy. Specimens of each species were found in the Lincoln University Entomology Research Museum. For each species a photo was taken of a specimen collected from Riccarton Bush (if available) and wingspan and coloration were noted (Fig. 1). Comprehensive information was found on four of the species in the book Butterflies and Common Moths of New Zealand by D E Gaskin, published in 1966. The later publication New Zealand Tussock Moths by E G White (2002) was also useful. The aim of this project is to place the information collected on Wikipedia (www.wikipedia.org); a web-based, collaborative, multilingual encyclopaedia project. Wikipedia is freely available to all web users giving a large potential audience. Having this information available in an easily accessible and updatable medium, such as the internet, allows development of a broad picture of biodiversity in habitats such as Riccarton Bush. The collection and sharing of knowledge by citizen scientists and science professionals has been successfully employed in Eric Spurr’s (Landcare) yearly Garden Bird Survey and Kaupapa Kereru. Valuable observations are being recorded by the public. Web based communities such as NatureWatch NZ (www.naturewatch.org.nz) enable individuals to record their observations of nature and upload photos for others to see and identify the specimens if need be. Since a major update of the NatureWatch NZ website in 2012 over 20,000 observations have been recorded; many of these being insects and spiders. NatureWatch NZ displays information from Wikipedia about each species and higher taxon. Through this development of a broader picture of biodiversity I hope more people can appreciate the wonderful intricacies of nature that exist as close as their own backyard. Much information I am sure is in notebooks and people’s heads so I invite others, professional and amateur entomologists alike, to also contribute to this “Moths of Riccarton Bush” project. Information can be sent to directly to me via email at [email protected] or the Wikipedia pages themselves can be edited directly. A list of the moths and links to each page can be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moths_of_Riccarton_Bush. This page of course can be updated and more moths added. 24 Denise Ford Fig.1. Specimens of moths collected at Riccarton Bush held at the Lincoln University Entomology Research Museum. On the left is Austrocidaria similata and on the right Pseudocoremia suavis. References Gaskin DE 1966 The Butterflies and Common Moths of New Zealand. Christchurch: Whitcombe and Tombs Limited. Molloy B (Ed.). 1995 Riccarton Bush: Putaringamotu. Christchurch: The Caxton Press. White EG 2002 New Zealand Tussock Grassland Moths. Christchurch: Manaaki Whenua Press List of Geometridae and Wikipedia Links 1. Asaphodes aegrota –http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asaphodes_aegrota 2. Austrocidaria similata – http:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrocidaria_similata 3. Chalastra s.l.ochre – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chalastra_ochre 4. Chloroclystis filata – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chloroclystis_filata 5. Cleora scriptaria – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleora_scriptaria 6. Declana floccosa – http://en.wikipedia.org.wiki/Declana_floccosa 7. Declana niveata – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declana_niveata 8. Epiphryne undosata – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epiphryne_undosata 9. Epiphryne verriculata – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epiphryne_verriculata 10. Epyaxa rosearia – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epyaxa_rosearia 11. Gellonia dejectaria – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gellonia_dejectaria 12. Helastia cineraria – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helastia_cineraria 13. Homodotis megaspilata – http://en.wikipedia/wiki/Homodotis_megaspilata 14. Orthoclydon praefactata – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthoclydon_praefactata 15. Pseudocoremia fenerata – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudocoremia_fenerata 16. Pseudocoremia suavis – http://en.wikipedia.org.wiki/Pseudocoremia_suavis 17. Sestra humeraria – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sestra_humeraria 18. Xanthorrhoe semifissata – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xanthorrhoe_semifissata 19. Xyridacma alectoraria – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xyridacma_alectoraria 20. Xyridacma ustaria – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xyridacma_ustaria .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Entomology of the Aucklands and Other Islands South of New Zealand: Lepidoptera, Ex­ Cluding Non-Crambine Pyralidae
    Pacific Insects Monograph 27: 55-172 10 November 1971 ENTOMOLOGY OF THE AUCKLANDS AND OTHER ISLANDS SOUTH OF NEW ZEALAND: LEPIDOPTERA, EX­ CLUDING NON-CRAMBINE PYRALIDAE By J. S. Dugdale1 CONTENTS Introduction 55 Acknowledgements 58 Faunal Composition and Relationships 58 Faunal List 59 Key to Families 68 1. Arctiidae 71 2. Carposinidae 73 Coleophoridae 76 Cosmopterygidae 77 3. Crambinae (pt Pyralidae) 77 4. Elachistidae 79 5. Geometridae 89 Hyponomeutidae 115 6. Nepticulidae 115 7. Noctuidae 117 8. Oecophoridae 131 9. Psychidae 137 10. Pterophoridae 145 11. Tineidae... 148 12. Tortricidae 156 References 169 Note 172 Abstract: This paper deals with all Lepidoptera, excluding the non-crambine Pyralidae, of Auckland, Campbell, Antipodes and Snares Is. The native resident fauna of these islands consists of 42 species of which 21 (50%) are endemic, in 27 genera, of which 3 (11%) are endemic, in 12 families. The endemic fauna is characterised by brachyptery (66%), body size under 10 mm (72%) and concealed, or strictly ground- dwelling larval life. All species can be related to mainland forms; there is a distinctive pre-Pleistocene element as well as some instances of possible Pleistocene introductions, as suggested by the presence of pairs of species, one member of which is endemic but fully winged. A graph and tables are given showing the composition of the fauna, its distribution, habits, and presumed derivations. Host plants or host niches are discussed. An additional 7 species are considered to be non-resident waifs. The taxonomic part includes keys to families (applicable only to the subantarctic fauna), and to genera and species.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of the Sex Pheromone of the Common Forest Looper Pseudocoremia Suavis
    Identification of the Sex Pheromone of the Common Forest Looper Pseudocoremia suavis A.R. Gibb, D.M. Suckling, A. M. El-Sayed, B. Bunn, D. Comeskey, H. Jactel, L. Berndt, D. Steward, R. Franich and E. G. Brockerhoff June 2004 Research report commissioned by New Zealand Forest Health Research Collaborative HortResearch Client Report No. 9733 HortResearch Contract No. 18035 HortResearch Corporate Office 120 Mt Albert Road, Private Bag 92 169 AUCKLAND, NZ Tel: +64-9-815 4200 Fax: +64-9-815 4201 Dr D.M. Suckling, A.R. Gibb, A.M. El-Sayed Canterbury Research Centre Gerald Street, PO. Box 51 LINCOLN, NZ Tel: +64-3-325 6600 Fax: +64-3-325 6063 B. Bunn, D. Comeskey Palmerston North Research Centre Tennent Drive, Private Bag 11 030 PALMERSTON NORTH, NZ Tel: +64-6-356 8080 Fax: +64-6-354 66731 E. G. Brockerhoff, L. Berndt Forest Research P.O. Box 29237, Fendalton, CHRISTCHURCH, NZ Tel: +64-3-364 2949 Fax: +64-3-364 2812 D. Steward, R. Franich Forest Research Private Bag 3020 ROTORUA, NZ Tel: +64-7-343 5899 Fax: +64-7-348 0952 H. Jactel Laboratory of Forest Entomology, INRA, 69 Route d'Arcachon, 33612, Cestas, Cedex, France. Fax: 33-5-56 68 05 46 Frontispiece: An adult male common forest looper Pseudocoremia suavis This report has been prepared by The Horticulture and Food Research Institute of New Zealand Ltd (HortResearch) which has its Head Office at Mt Albert Research Centre, Private Bag 92 169, Auckland and has been approved by: __________________________ __________________________ Research Scientist Team Leader, Bioprotection Date: 28th June
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology of Forest Insect Invasions
    Biol Invasions (2017) 19:3141–3159 DOI 10.1007/s10530-017-1514-1 FOREST INVASION Ecology of forest insect invasions E. G. Brockerhoff . A. M. Liebhold Received: 13 March 2017 / Accepted: 14 July 2017 / Published online: 20 July 2017 Ó Springer International Publishing AG 2017 Abstract Forests in virtually all regions of the world trade. The dominant invasion ‘pathways’ are live plant are being affected by invasions of non-native insects. imports, shipment of solid wood packaging material, We conducted an in-depth review of the traits of ‘‘hitchhiking’’ on inanimate objects, and intentional successful invasive forest insects and the ecological introductions of biological control agents. Invading processes involved in insect invasions across the insects exhibit a variety of life histories and include universal invasion phases (transport and arrival, herbivores, detritivores, predators and parasitoids. establishment, spread and impacts). Most forest insect Herbivores are considered the most damaging and invasions are accidental consequences of international include wood-borers, sap-feeders, foliage-feeders and seed eaters. Most non-native herbivorous forest insects apparently cause little noticeable damage but some species have profoundly altered the composition and ecological functioning of forests. In some cases, Guest Editors: Andrew Liebhold, Eckehard Brockerhoff and non-native herbivorous insects have virtually elimi- Martin Nun˜ez / Special issue on Biological Invasions in Forests nated their hosts, resulting in major changes in forest prepared by a task force of the International Union of Forest composition and ecosystem processes. Invasive preda- Research Organizations (IUFRO). tors (e.g., wasps and ants) can have major effects on forest communities. Some parasitoids have caused the Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10530-017-1514-1) contains supple- decline of native hosts.
    [Show full text]
  • Beginners' Guide to Macro Moths
    NZ moths are special Moths can also be pests Why we need to trap the moths? Why do we need to study moths? More than 86% of the known moths Hīhue (the kūmara moth, Agrius Who benefits from Moths are mainly out at night, so Moths breed fast and have lots of in NZ are endemic. They only occur convolvuli) had a large impact on studying moths? most people don’t see how many offspring. There are lots of different in NZ so we have to look after kūmara crops and there are many there are or what’s happening moth species playing different roles them.. whakatauki written about the to them. Unfortunately we need in the ecosystem. Moths have links Beginners’ Guide to Society caterpillar and its capacity to eat. You & I specimens for identification. to lots of other species (e.g. plants, Macro Moths Why are moths important? birds, introduced pests, other Moths are a key part of the wider A more recent pest is the codling Nature Why we need standardised data? invertebrates). ecosystem and they sit in the moth (Cydia pomonella). Introduced If we all use the same type of trap Te Tuakoko centre of a complex food web. The from Europe, it attacks apples, (e.g. a Heath Moth Trap) we can If something is changing in the caterpillars are herbivores eating a pears, walnuts, and other fruit. compare data from different places ecosystem, moths are amongst the first creatures to respond. They range of native plants. Education and over time. With standardised Moths have a bad reputation for information we can all work are likely to be good indicators of Stories Where to get more information & help Many adult moths drink nectar eating clothes, especially natural together to keep an eye on the change.
    [Show full text]
  • An Invertebrate Survey of Reserves, Covenants and Significant Remnants of Eastern Banks Peninsula in 2010-2011
    An Invertebrate survey of reserves, covenants and significant remnants of eastern Banks Peninsula in 2010-2011 by Mike Bowie, Cathy Mountier, Barry Fox, Stephane Boyer, Roseanna Gamlen-Greene, Sam Brown, Jon Sullivan, Robert Hoare and Peter Johns Lincoln University Wildlife Management Report No. 25 ISSN: 1177-6242 (Print) ISSN: 1179-7738 (Digital) ISBN: 978-0-86476-269-6 (Print) ISBN: 978-0-86476-270-2 (Digital) Lincoln University Wildlife Management Report No. 25 An Invertebrate survey of reserves, covenants and significant remnants of eastern Banks Peninsula in 2010-2011 by Mike Bowie, Cathy Mountier, Barry Fox, Stephane Boyer, Roseanna Gamlen-Greene, Sam Brown, Jon Sullivan, Robert Hoare (Landcare Research) and Peter Johns (Canterbury Museum) Ecology Division P.O. Box 84 Lincoln University [email protected] Prepared for: Josef Langer Trust & Department of Conservation September 2011 An Invertebrate survey of reserves, covenants and significant remnants of eastern Banks Peninsula in 2010-2011 Abstract Reserves, covenants and bush remnants of the eastern side of Banks Peninsula were surveyed for invertebrates including ground beetles (carabids), weevils, spiders, moths, earthworms and snails. Sixteen carabid species were found including one new Holcaspis species. The six-eyed spider Periegops suterii was found in six sites. Light trapping moths identified 202 species with 122 from Hinewai Reserve alone. Soil sampling found 13 endemic species of worms. New species of millipedes (Diplopoda) and cranefly (Tipulidae) were also found. Recommendations for future research on Banks Peninsula are given. Introduction The Eastern side of Banks Peninsula was created by eruptions and subsequent erosion of the Akaroa volcano which was active between 9 and 8 million years ago (Wilson, 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Zoologische Mededelingen 78-02
    A new species of the genus Aleiodes Wesmael from New Zealand (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Rogadinae) C. van Achterberg, L. Berndt, E. Brockerhoff & J. Berry Achterberg, C. van, L. Berndt, E. Brockerhoff & J. Berry. A new species of the genus Aleiodes Wesmael from New Zealand (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Rogadinae). Zool. Med. Leiden 78 (19), 31.xii.2004: 301-311, figs 1-40.— ISSN 0024-0672. C. van Achterberg, Afdeling Entomologie (Hymenoptera), Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, Postbus 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands (e-mail: [email protected]). L. Berndt & E. Brockerhoff, Forest Research, P.O. Box 29237, Fendalton, Christchurch 8004, New Zealand (e-mail: [email protected] / [email protected]). J. Berry, New Zealand Arthropod Collection, Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand (e-mail: [email protected]). Key words: Hymenoptera; Braconidae; Rogadinae; Aleiodes; New Zealand; Australasian; Oriental; East Palaearctic; new species; distribution; partial key; Geometridae; Ennominae; Declana floccosa; Pseudo- coremia suavis; Pseudocoremia fenerata. A new species of the genus Aleiodes Wesmael, 1838 (Braconidae: Rogadinae: Rogadini), A. declanae spec. nov. from New Zealand is described and illustrated. It has been reared from Declana floccosa Walker, Cleora scriptaria (Walker), Pseudocoremia suavis Butler and P. fenerata Felder & Rogenhofer (Geometridae: Ennominae). Introduction The second and third authors have been involved in compiling information on the parasitoids of an ennomine geometrid, Pseudocoremia suavis Butler, 1879, which had several large scale outbreaks in pine forests in New Zealand. One of the most common parasitoids proved to be an Aleiodes Wesmael, 1838 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Roga- dinae: Rogadini), which turned out to be a new species according to research by the first and last authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Izatha (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea: Oecophoridae)
    Hoare, R. J. B. 2010: Izatha (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea: Oecophoridae). Fauna of New Zealand 65, 201 pp. The Copyright notice printed on page 4 applies to the use of this PDF. This PDF is not to be posted on websites. Links should be made to: FNZ.LandcareResearch.co.nz EDITORIAL BOARD Dr R. M. Emberson, c/- Department of Ecology, P.O. Box 84, Lincoln University, New Zealand Dr M. J. Fletcher, Director of the Collections, NSW Agricultural Scientific Collections Unit, Forest Road, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia Dr R. J. B. Hoare, Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Dr M.-C. Larivière, Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Mr R. L. Palma, Natural Environment Department, Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, P.O. Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand SERIES EDITOR Dr T. K. Crosby, Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Fauna of New Zealand Ko te Aitanga Pepeke o Aotearoa Number / Nama 65 Izatha (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea: Oecophoridae) Robert J. B. Hoare Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland 1142, New Zealand [email protected] with colour plates by B.E. Rhode Manaak i W h e n u a P R E S S Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand 2010 4 Hoare (2010): Izatha (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea: Oecophoridae) Copyright © Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd 2010 No part of this work covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping information retrieval systems, or otherwise) without the written permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Spillover and Species Interactions Across Habitat Edges Between Managed and Natural Forests
    SPILLOVER AND SPECIES INTERACTIONS ACROSS HABITAT EDGES BETWEEN MANAGED AND NATURAL FORESTS ____________________________________________________ A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Canterbury by Carol M. Frost ____________________________________________________ School of Biological Sciences University of Canterbury 2013 Table of Contents Table of Contents………………………………………………………………………...ii List of Tables………………………………………………………………………...…..vi List of Figures…………………………………………………………………………..vii Abstract………………………………………………………………………………...viii Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………....x Chapter I: Introduction………………………………………………………………….1 1.1 Land-use change as the leading cause of biodiversity loss………………………….1 1.2 Biodiversity conservation versus agricultural production…………………………..2 1.3 Spillover edge effects as a mechanism of change in remnant natural ecosystems….3 1.4 Measuring ecological change: species interactions underlie ecosystem function…..5 1.5 Predicting indirect interactions……………………………………………………...6 1.6 Thesis objectives, study system, and outline………………………………………..9 Chapter II: Community-level spillover of natural enemies.........................................14 2.1 Abstract…………………………………………………………………………….14 2.2 Introduction………………………………………………………………………...15 2.3 Methods…………………………………………………………………………….18 2.3.1 Study system…………………………………………………………………...18 2.3.2 Sampling herbivore abundance and parasitism levels…………………………20 2.3.3 Measuring spillover of natural
    [Show full text]
  • Douglas-Fir What Science Can Tell Us – an Option for Europe
    Douglas-fir What Science Can Tell Us – an option for Europe Heinrich Spiecker, Marcus Lindner and Johanna Schuler (editors) What Science Can Tell Us 9 2019 What Science Can Tell Us Lauri Hetemäki, Editor-In-Chief Georg Winkel, Associate Editor Pekka Leskinen, Associate Editor Minna Korhonen, Managing Editor The editorial office can be contacted at [email protected] Layout: Grano Oy / Jouni Halonen Printing: Grano Oy Disclaimer: The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the European Forest Institute. ISBN 978-952-5980-65-3 (printed) ISBN 978-952-5980-66-0 (pdf) Douglas-fir What Science Can Tell Us – an option for Europe Heinrich Spiecker, Marcus Lindner and Johanna Schuler (editors) Funded by the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Union This publication is based upon work from COST Action FP1403 NNEXT, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). www.cost.eu Contents Preface ................................................................................................................................9 Acknowledgements...........................................................................................................11 Executive summary ...........................................................................................................13 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................17 Heinrich Spiecker and Johanna Schuler 2. Douglas-fir
    [Show full text]
  • Coremia Suavis on Douglas Fir
    PREDICTING OUTBREAKS OF PSEUDO­ COREMIA SUAVIS ON DOUGLAS FIR M. K. KAY* ABSTRACT This paper presents the final data from a study oj endemic populations of Pseudocoremia suavis on Douglas fir. The cor­ relation oj rainfall, during the early developmental stages of P. suavis, with subsequent population development is described as a predictive tool for focusing attention on high risk Douglas fir plantations. The indigenous pine looper Pseudocoremia suavis Butler (Lepi­ doptera: Geometridae) is the most serious defoliator of exotic forests in New Zealand. Recorded outbreaks on Douglas fir {Pseudotsuga menziesii) (Mirb.) Franco have been confined to Kaingaroa State Forest, where, in the last decade, three isolated, explosive population increases have been observed in the "old crop" (45- to 60-year-old) single species stands. The outbreaks, apparently developed from high, though benign, endemic popu­ lations, were shortlived and were probably terminated by viral infection. Douglas fir represents about 7% of the total exotic forest estate, with approximately half of the national resource located in the Rotorua Conservancy. The greater proportion (12 740 ha) of the Rotorua Douglas fir is in the "old crop" (pre-1940) category (Chandler, 1974). Approximately 90% of Douglas fir plantings in other Conservancies are post 1950. To date Douglas fir defoliation has been a Rotorua problem. The Rotorua ex­ perience may benefit other forests approaching old crop status and may help in the management planning of long-term amenity plantings. Detection and monitoring of outbreaks of P. sucvis populations would be greatly facilitated if observations could be focused, both temporally and spatially, on forests most susceptible to epidemics.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Ecology of Blueberry Spanworm, Itame Argillacearia (Packard) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae)
    CHEMICAL ECOLOGY OF BLUEBERRY SPANWORM, ITAME ARGILLACEARIA (PACKARD) (LEPIDOPTERA: GEOMETRIDAE) by E. C. Amal De Silva Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia November 2012 © Copyright by E. C. Amal De Silva, 2012 DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE The undersigned hereby certify that they have read and recommend to the Faculty of Graduate Studies for acceptance a thesis entitled “CHEMICAL ECOLOGY OF BLUEBERRY SPANWORM, ITAME ARGILLACEARIA (PACKARD) (LEPIDOPTERA: GEOMETRIDAE)” by E. C. Amal De Silva in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. Dated: November 27, 2012 Supervisor: _________________________________ Readers: _________________________________ _________________________________ _________________________________ __________________________________ ii DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY DATE: November 27, 2012 AUTHOR: E. C. Amal De Silva TITLE: CHEMICAL ECOLOGY OF BLUEBERRY SPANWORM, ITAME ARGILLACEARIA (PACKARD) (LEPIDOPTERA: GEOMETRIDAE) DEPARTMENT OR SCHOOL: FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE DEGREE: MSc CONVOCATION: May YEAR: 2013 Permission is herewith granted to Dalhousie University to circulate and to have copied for non‐commercial purposes, at its discretion, the above title upon the request of individuals or institutions. I understand that my thesis will be electronically available to the public. The author reserves other publication rights, and neither the thesis nor extensive extracts from it may be printed or
    [Show full text]
  • New World Geometrid Moths (Lepidoptera: Geometridae): Molecular Phylogeny, Biogeography, Taxonomic Updates and Description of 11 New Tribes
    77 (3): 457 – 486 2019 © Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 2019. New World geometrid moths (Lepidoptera: Geometridae): Molecular phylogeny, biogeography, taxonomic updates and description of 11 new tribes Gunnar Brehm *, 1, Leidys Murillo-Ramos 2, 14, Pasi Sihvonen 3, Axel Hausmann 4, B. Christian Schmidt 5, Erki Õunap 6, 7, Alfred Moser 8, Rolf Mörtter 9, Daniel Bolt 10, Florian Bodner 11, Aare Lindt 12, Luis E. Parra 13 & Niklas Wahlberg 14 1 Institut für Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie mit Phyletischem Museum, Erbertstr. 1, 07743 Jena, Germany; Gunnar Brehm * [gunnar.brehm @ uni-jena.de] — 2 Departamento de Biología, Universidad de Sucre; Leidys Murillo-Ramos [[email protected]] — 3 Finnish Mu- seum of Natural History, Pohjoinen Rautatiekatu 13, 00100 Helsinki, Finland; Pasi Sihvonen [[email protected]] — 4 Staatliche Natur- wissenschaftliche Sammlungen Bayerns – Zoologische Staatssammlung München, Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247 München, Germany; Axel Hausmann [[email protected]] — 5 Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids & Nematodes, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, ON, K1A 0C6, Canada; B. Christian Schmidt [[email protected]] — 6 Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Vanemuise 46, 51014 Tartu, Estonia; Erki Õunap [[email protected]] — 7 Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 5, 51006 Tartu, Estonia — 8 UFRGS – Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre,
    [Show full text]