DOCSLIB.ORG

The Hidden Ally: How the Canadian Supreme Court Has Advanced the Vitality of the Francophone Quebec Community

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Hidden Ally: How the Canadian Supreme Court Has Advanced the Vitality of the Francophone Quebec Community The Hidden Ally: How the Canadian Supreme Court Has Advanced the Vitality of the Francophone Québec Community DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Douglas S. Roberts, B.A., J.D., M.A. Graduate Program in French and Italian The Ohio State University 2015 Dissertation Committee: Professor Wynne Wong, Advisor Professor Danielle Marx-Scouras, Advisor Professor Jennifer Willging Copyright by Douglas S. Roberts 2015 Abstract Since the adoption of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982, the Canadian Supreme Court has become a much more powerful and influential player in the Canadian political and social landscape. As such, the Court has struck down certain sections of the Charter of the French Language (Bill 101) as contrary to the Constitution, 1867 and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In Ford v. Québec, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 712, for instance, the Court found unconstitutional that portion of Bill 101 that required commercial signage to be in French only. After the decision was announced, public riots broke out in Montreal. As a result of this decision, one could conclude that the Court has, in fact, resisted Québec‘s attempts to protect and promote its own language and culture. In this dissertation, however, I argue that this perception is not justified, primarily because it fails to recognize how Canadian federalism protects diversity within the Confederation. Contrary to the initial public reaction to the Ford case, my contention is that the Court has, in fact, advanced and protected the vitality of Francophone Québec by developing three fundamental principles. The first principle is institutional integrity. Under this principle, the Court has advanced the rule of law in Canada by protecting the integrity of the process by which members of the Court and Senate are chosen. This is important because both institutions are particularly important to the balance of power and the protection of minority groups within the Confederation, including minority language communities. The second principle is Canadian federalism. ii Under this principle the Court has developed a jurisprudence in which the provinces retain sufficient legislative power to manage their own internal affairs, and in the case of Québec, particularly those relating to language and education. The third principle is constitutional dialogue. Under this principle, the Court encourages a constitutional dialogue between the political actors, after the Court has struck down a law as unconstitutional, that maximizes the democratic process and Québec‘s ability to protect and advance the Francophone culture. As a result of these principles, the Court has created the legal framework that not only has enabled Québec to protect and promote its language and culture, but also developed those overreaching constitutional principles that strengthen the Canadian Confederation. iii Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to my wife, Mary Ellen Coleman. iv Acknowledgments I am certainly grateful for the help, guidance, and encouragement of those OSU professors who served on my committee, including Jean Francois Fourny, Wynne Wong, Danielle Marx-Scouras, and Jennifer Willging. But there are also others. It is challenging to write about a legal system in a foreign country. While I have practiced law for many years in the United States, the Canada legal system is different, and I found that I had to be very careful that I did not let my American experience as a lawyer cause me to make inaccurate assumptions and statements about the Canadian political and legal system. I have practiced law for 35 years in Ohio, and through the course of the practice, I was quick to learn that whenever a lawyer tried to handle a case outside his or her area of expertise, bad things often happened. I did not want to make that mistake here. Reading articles and books about the Canadian legal system can only take you so far. In order to test our your ideas, there comes a time when you simply need to dialogue not only with your American colleagues, but also with Canadian lawyers, law students, teachers, and law professors. And that is what I have done here. To that end, I want to acknowledge the assistance of a number of people who guided me on this journey, including Denis Fourny, Jean-Daniel Vieilleux, Inés Negrete, Sarah-Emmanuelle Duchesne, Stéphane Lewis-White, Kevin P. Hidas, Roman Ivanov, Professors Morgan Liu, Stéphane Spoiden, Stéphane Beaulac, Daniel v Turp, and Jarrett Rudy; and Attorneys Mark C. Power, Keiran Gibbs, and Lisa Moncalieri. I always found my exchanges with these people, either in person or by email, extremely helpful. Professor Beaulac, Keiran, and Roman, in particular, provided me with wonderful feedback throughout this rather challenging task. And above all, I am grateful for the encouragement, love, and support of my incredible wife, Mary Ellen. With the help of all of these persons, this dissertation went through countless drafts, and I hopefully got it right. I am grateful for their expertise, kindness, patience, and steadfast encouragement. Any and all errors are of my own creation. vi Vita April 30, 1951 ................................................Born – Columbus, Ohio 1973................................................................B.A., Philosophy, Ohio University 1976................................................................J.D., Law, The Ohio State University 1976-1977 ......................................................Clerk to C. William O‘Neill, Chief Justice of the Ohio Supreme Court 1977-1978 ......................................................Clerk to Robert M. Duncan, Judge of the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio 1984................................................................Adjunct Professor, College of Law The Ohio State University 2002-2004 ......................................................Instructor, Legal Nurse Consultant Program Capital University Law School 2011................................................................M.A., French, The Ohio State University Publications Co-author. "A Practitioner's Guide to Comparative Negligence in Ohio." Ohio State Law Journal41.1: 1980. Co-author. "Consumerism Comes of Age: Treble Damages and Attorney Fees in Consumer Transactions - the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act." Ohio State Law Journal42.927: 1981. Associate editor. Couse‘s Ohio Form Book, 6th edition. Howard A. Couse and Glen Weissenberger, main authors. Cincinnati: Anderson. 1984. Contributing author. Handling Automobile Warranty and Repossession Cases. Roger D. Billings, main author. Rochester: Lawyers Co-Operative Pub., 1984. vii "Forum Shopping: Beating the Statute of Limitations in Product Liability Cases." Ohio Trial Summer 1993. Fields of Study Major Field: French and Italian viii Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................... ii Dedication .......................................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgments............................................................................................................... v Vita .................................................................................................................................... vii List of Figures ................................................................................................................... xii Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 The Constitutional Framework of the British North America Act, 1867 ......................... 13 The Supreme Court of Canada .......................................................................................... 17 The Principles adopted to advance the Francophone community vitality ........................ 22 How the Canadian Supreme Court has advanced Québec language/culture...…….…….26 Chapter 1: Québec’s Quiet Revolution ........................................................................ 35 Bringing Québec into the modern age: The Quiet Revolution ........................................ 35 The Design of Canadian Confederation: Constitution, 1867 ............................................ 51 The Canadian Court System ............................................................................................. 59 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 65 Chapter 2: Principle of Institutional Integrity ............................................................ 67 ix Reference re Supreme Court Act, sections 5 and 6 (2014) ............................................... 67 Reference re Senate Reform (2014) .................................................................................. 77 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 86 Chapter 3: Principle of Canadian Federalism ............................................................ 88 Ford v. Québec: Constitutional challenge to Bill 101 (1988) .......................................... 90 Re Reference re Secession of Québec (1998) ................................................................. 104 Reference re Securities Act (2010) ................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ntract Law Eform in Quebec
    Vol . 60 September 1982 Septembre No . 3 NTRACT LAW EFORM IN QUEBEC P.P.C . HAANAPPEL* Montreal I. Introduction . Most of the law of contractual obligations in Quebec is contained in 1982 CanLIIDocs 22 the Civil Code of Lower Canada of 1966. 1 As is the case with the large majority of civil codes in the world, the Civil Code of Quebec was conceived, written and brought into force in a pre-industrialized environment. Its philosophy is one of individualism and economic liberalism . Much has changed in the socio-economic conditions of Quebec since 1866. The state now plays a far more active and im- portant role in socio-economic life than it did in the nineteenth century. More particularly in the field of contracts, the principle of equality of contracting parties or in.other words the principle of equal bargaining power has been severely undermined . Economic distribution chan- nels have become much longer than in 1866, which has had a pro- found influence especially on the contract of sale. Today products are rarely bought directly from their producer, but are purchased through one or more intermediaries so that there will then be no direct con- tractual link between producer (manufacturer) and user (consumer).' Furthermore, the Civil Code of 1866 is much more preoccupied with immoveables (land and buildings) than it .is with moveables (chat- tels) . Twentieth century commercial transactions, however, more often involve moveable than immoveable objects . * P.P.C. Haanappel, of the Faculty of Law, McGill University, Montreal. This article is a modified version of a paper presented by the author to ajoint session of the Commercial and Consumer Law, Contract Law and Comparative Law Sections of the 1981 Conference of the Canadian Association of Law Teachers.
    [Show full text]
  • Relevance and Proportionality in the Rules of Civil Procedure in Canadian Jurisdictions
    T HE S EDONA C ONFERENCE ® W ORKING G ROUP S ERIES SM THE SEDONA CANADA SM COMMENTARY ON PROPORTIONALITY IN ELECTRONIC DISCLOSURE & D ISCOVERY A Project of The Sedona Conference ® Working Group 7 (WG7) Sedona Canada SM OCTOBER 2010 Copyright © 2010, The Sedona Conference ® The Sedona Canada SM Commentary on Proportionality in Electronic Disclosure and Discovery Working Group 7 “Sedona Canada SM ” OCTOBER 2010 P UBLIC COMMENT VERSION Author: The Sedona Conference ® Commentary Drafting Team : Sedona Canada SM Editorial Board: Todd J. Burke Justice Colin L. Campbell Justice Colin L. Campbell Robert J. C. Deane (chair) Jean-François De Rico Peg Duncan Peg Duncan Kelly Friedman (ex officio) Edmund Huang Karen B. Groulx Kristian Littman Dominic Jaar Edwina Podemski Glenn Smith James T. Swanson The Sedona Conference ® also wishes to acknowledge the members of The Sedona Conference ® Working Group 7 (“Sedona Canada SM ”) who contributed to the dialogue while this Commentary was a work-in-progress. We also wish to thank all of our Working Group Series SM Sponsors, whose support is essential to The Sedona Conference’s ® ability to develop Working Group Series SM publications such as this. For a complete listing of our Sponsors, click on the “Sponsors” navigation bar on the home page of our website at www.thesedonaconference.org . Copyright © 2010 The Sedona Conference ® All Rights Reserved. REPRINT REQUESTS: Requests for reprints or reprint information should be directed to Richard Braman, Executive Director of The Sedona Conference ®, at [email protected] or 1-866-860-6600. The opinions expressed in this publication, unless otherwise attributed, represent consensus views of the members of The Sedona Conference ® Working Group 7 (“Sedona Canada SM ”) .
    [Show full text]
  • Res Extra Commercium and the Barriers Faced When Seeking the Repatriation and Return of Potent Cultural Objects
    American Indian Law Journal Volume 4 Issue 2 Article 5 May 2017 Res Extra Commercium and the Barriers Faced When Seeking the Repatriation and Return of Potent Cultural Objects Sara Gwendolyn Ross Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/ailj Part of the Cultural Heritage Law Commons, Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Ross, Sara Gwendolyn (2017) "Res Extra Commercium and the Barriers Faced When Seeking the Repatriation and Return of Potent Cultural Objects," American Indian Law Journal: Vol. 4 : Iss. 2 , Article 5. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/ailj/vol4/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Publications and Programs at Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Indian Law Journal by an authorized editor of Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Res Extra Commercium and the Barriers Faced When Seeking the Repatriation and Return of Potent Cultural Objects Cover Page Footnote Sara Ross is a Ph.D. Candidate and Joseph-Armand Bombardier CGS Doctoral Scholar at Osgoode Hall Law School in Toronto, Canada. Sara holds five previous degrees, including a B.A. in French Language and Literature from the University of Alberta; B.A. Honours in Anthropology from McGill; both a civil law degree (B.C.L.) and common law degree (L.L.B.) from the McGill Faculty of Law; and an L.L.M, from the University of Ottawa.
    [Show full text]
  • Quebec Education: the Unfinished Revolution
    Norman Henchty Quebec Education: The Unfinished Revolution Profound changes have taken place in the Province of Quebec since 1960. The period is described as the Quiet Revo­ lution and like all genuine revolutions change penetrated deeply into every aspect of the society - the identity, the culture, the institutions, and the people. The French-speaking Quebecer was once defined by his attachment to tradition, his allegiance to the Church, his elitist view of society, his distrust of change, and his detachment from the economic life of the continent. But a new definition has been emerging over the last decade: concern for the present, adherence to a secular and political ethic, an egalitarian view of society, a commit­ ment to change, an engagement in the technology and econ­ omics of the post-industrial state. As the identity of the French Quebecer alters, the tradi­ tional assumptions on which the English Quebecer has oper­ ated no longer hold. His economic and social cocoon has been broken open and he finds himself a member of a minority group, a stranger in a strange land. His identity is trans­ formed and in an ironic way he exchanges places with the French: it is now the English Quebecer who worries about the survival of his culture and language, who seeks his security in tradition, who stands on his constitutional rights. As identities change, so do cultures and institutions. Churches and convents, once the citadels of power, become shrines of a history turned aside; the theology and history of the classical college become the sociology and informatique of the Cegeps; the triumvirate of doctor-lawyer-priest becomes that of bureaucrat-accountant-animateur .
    [Show full text]
  • Conservatives, the Supreme Court of Canada, and the Constitution: Judicial-Government Relations, 2006–2015 Christopher Manfredi Mcgill University
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by York University, Osgoode Hall Law School Osgoode Hall Law Journal Article 6 Volume 52, Issue 3 (Summer 2015) Conservatives, the Supreme Court of Canada, and the Constitution: Judicial-Government Relations, 2006–2015 Christopher Manfredi McGill University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj Part of the Law Commons Article This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Citation Information Manfredi, Christopher. "Conservatives, the Supreme Court of Canada, and the Constitution: Judicial-Government Relations, 2006–2015." Osgoode Hall Law Journal 52.3 (2015) : 951-984. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol52/iss3/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Osgoode Hall Law Journal by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. Conservatives, the Supreme Court of Canada, and the Constitution: Judicial-Government Relations, 2006–2015 Abstract Three high-profile government losses in the Supreme Court of Canada in late 2013 and early 2014, combined with the government’s response to those losses, generated a narrative of an especially fractious relationship between Stephen Harper’s Conservative government and the Court. This article analyzes this narrative more rigorously by going beyond a mere tallying of government wins and losses in the Court. Specifically, it examines Charter-based invalidations of federal legislation since 2006, three critical reference opinions rendered at the government’s own request, and two key judgments delivered in the spring of 2015 concerning Aboriginal rights and the elimination of the long-gun registry.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Review of the Division of Powers in the Supreme Court of Canada 2010 Canliidocs 474 Wade K
    The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference Volume 51 (2010) Article 21 Facilitating Intergovernmental Dialogue: Judicial Review of the Division of Powers in the Supreme Court of Canada 2010 CanLIIDocs 474 Wade K. Wright Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/sclr This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Citation Information Wright, Wade K.. "Facilitating Intergovernmental Dialogue: Judicial Review of the Division of Powers in the Supreme Court of Canada." The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference 51. (2010). http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/sclr/vol51/iss1/21 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The uS preme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. Facilitating Intergovernmental Dialogue: Judicial Review of the Division of Powers in the Supreme Court of Canada 2010 CanLIIDocs 474 Wade K. Wright∗ I. INTRODUCTION A cursory review of any Canadian law review tells the story: the Ca- nadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms1 is “in” and the division of powers is “out”. Since 1982, when the Charter came into force, there has been a vast amount of writing about the Supreme Court of Canada’s Charter decisions. However, its division of powers decisions, once the staple of constitutional law scholars, are now routinely ignored, particu- larly in English Canada.2 This trend has been noted before, with little effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: a 10-Year Democratic Audit 2014 Canliidocs 33319 Adam M
    The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference Volume 67 (2014) Article 4 Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: A 10-Year Democratic Audit 2014 CanLIIDocs 33319 Adam M. Dodek Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/sclr This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Citation Information Dodek, Adam M.. "Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: A 10-Year Democratic Audit." The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference 67. (2014). http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/sclr/vol67/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The uS preme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: A 10-Year Democratic Audit* Adam M. Dodek** 2014 CanLIIDocs 33319 The way in which Justice Rothstein was appointed marks an historic change in how we appoint judges in this country. It brought unprecedented openness and accountability to the process. The hearings allowed Canadians to get to know Justice Rothstein through their members of Parliament in a way that was not previously possible.1 — The Rt. Hon. Stephen Harper, PC [J]udicial appointments … [are] a critical part of the administration of justice in Canada … This is a legacy issue, and it will live on long after those who have the temporary stewardship of this position are no longer there.
    [Show full text]
  • “Canada” on the Supreme Court in 2016
    DRAFT | CPSA 2017 Please don’t cite without permission Competing Diversities: Representing “Canada” on the Supreme Court in 2016 Erin Crandall | Acadia University Robert Schertzer | University of Toronto The Supreme Court oF Canada’s (SCC) inFluence on politics and public policy – from deciding human rights cases to adjudicating Federal-provincial disputes – has long placed it in the spotlight oF political actors and watchers alike. Seeing the Court as activist or restrained, as siding with the Federal government or as balanced in its Federalism case law, as anti-democratic or the guardian oF the constitution, are all hallmarks oF the debate about its place in Canadian politics. Underpinning these debates is an often-critical focus on the justices’ themselves, the process by which they are selected, and the virtually unFettered power Prime Ministers have had in appointing individuals to the bench. In August 2016, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau clearly established his position within this debate by announcing a new way to choose SCC justices. Along with promoting more transparency and accountability in the process, the key elements oF Trudeau’s proposed reForms were to ensure that all future justices were functionally bilingual and that they represent the diversity of Canada (see Trudeau 2016b). In line with these new objectives, one oF the First things Trudeau highlighted in his announcement was a willingness to break with the convention of regional representation on the bench and move toward an open application process. With the upcoming retirement of Nova Scotia Justice Thomas Cromwell in September 2016, questions immediately emerged as to whether the government would deviate from the tradition of having one of the nine justices on the SCC come from Atlantic Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Court Cour Fédérale
    Federal Court Cour fédérale THE HONOURABLE SEAN J. HARRINGTON THE FEDERAL COURTS JURISDICTION CONFERENCE STEERING COMMITTEE PERSONAL REMINISCENCES At our Jurisdiction Conference Steering Committee meeting, held on Thursday, 22 July 2010, it was agreed that we should focus on the present and the future. However, it was also thought that some mention should be made of the original raison d’être of our courts and their history. As Chief Justice Lutfy is fond of pointing out, Mr. Justice Hughes and I are probably the only two sitting judges who not only appeared in the courts from day one, but also appeared in the Exchequer Court! This got me to thinking how important the Federal Courts were in my practice, and gave me a bad case of nostalgia. Maritime law has always been my speciality (although my first appearance in the Exchequer Court was before President Jackett on an Anti-Combines matter). The Federal Court had many advantages over provincial courts. Its writ ran nationwide. Cargo might be discharged in one province and delivered in another. Provincial courts were less prone at that time to take jurisdiction over defendants who could not be personally served within the jurisdiction. Provincial bars were very parochial, and in the days before inter-provincial law firms, if it were not for the Federal Court, maritime players and their underwriters sometimes had to hire two or more different law firms to pursue what was essentially one cause of action. Doc: Federal Courts_Personal Reminiscences_SJH_18-Aug-10.doc Page: 1 The Crown was a much bigger player in maritime matters in the 1970s.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaying Justice Is Denying Justice: an Urgent Need to Address Lengthy Court Delays in Canada (Final Report), June 2017
    DELAYING JUSTICE IS DENYING JUSTICE An Urgent Need to Address Lengthy Court Delays in Canada Final report of the Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs The Honourable Bob Runciman, Chair The Honourable George Baker, P.C., Deputy Chair SBK>QB SK>Q June 2017 CANADA This report may be cited as: Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, Delaying Justice is Denying Justice: An Urgent Need to Address Lengthy Court Delays in Canada (Final Report), June 2017. For more information please contact us by email [email protected] by phone: (613) 990-6087 toll-free: 1 800 267-7362 by mail: The Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, Senate, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0A4 This report can be downloaded at: www.senate-senat.ca/lcjc.asp Ce rapport est également offert en français Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 1 Priority Recommendations ....................................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER ONE - INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 9 Canada’s Critical Delay Problem ............................................................................................................... 9 The Committee’s Study ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Questions and Answers for NCSEA International Subcommittee
    NCSEA International Sub-committee conference call presentation - notes Dec. 17, 2019 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS: CANADA 1. Can you provide any update as to when Canada is likely to ratify the 2007 Hague Convention? The following steps are still required before Canada can ratify the 2007 Convention: 1) Finalize the draft uniform act for the implementation of the 2007 Convention by interested Canadian provinces and territories; 2) Adoption of the uniform act by some provinces and territories; and 3) Finally, ratification of the Convention and extension to those provinces or territories that have adopted legislation and want the Convention to apply in their territory. 2. When the Convention comes into force, we understand that it may not necessarily apply to all provinces and territories. How will cases where a parent leaves a Convention province and goes to a non-Convention province be handled? Where a parent leaves a Convention province and goes to a non-Convention province, the file can be transferred to the non-Convention province for processing only if the requesting State has a reciprocity arrangement with the non-Convention province. If no reciprocity arrangement exists between the non-Convention province and the requesting State, then the applicant will need to obtain private counsel in Canada to assist them with their case. 3. REMO has recently had correspondence returned from the following address : Family Responsibility Office, Interjurisdictional Support Orders Unit, PO Box 600, Steeles West Post Office, Toronto, Ontario, M3J OK8, Canada-cover envelope suggests the office has moved. Can you confirm where REMO should write instead please? Ontario confirms this is the correct address.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy on Educational Success a Love of Learning, a Chance to Succeed
    POLICY ON EDUCATIONAL SUCCESS A LOVE OF LEARNING, A CHANCE TO SUCCEED POLICY ON EDUCATIONAL SUCCESS A LOVE OF LEARNING, A CHANCE TO SUCCEED This document is available on the Ministère’s website at education.gouv.qc.ca. © Gouvernement du Québec Ministère de l’Éducation et de l’Enseignement supérieur ISBN 978-2-550-78835-5 (version imprimée) ISBN 978-2-550-78836-2 (PDF) (English edition: ISBN 978-2-550-78838-6) Legal deposit – Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec, 2017 MESSAGE FROM THE PREMIER In Québec, education is a priority. Indeed, it is the key required to build a more prosperous and innovative society. In a changing world, it is a quintessential asset needed to meet challenges associated with all sectors of activity, to ensure the well-being of the population and to increase prosperity both individually and as a society. However, our education system, like our society, must adapt to the changes that each new generation brings. To provide Québec with an educational model for the 21st century, our government has toiled daily to more effectively manage our public finances and develop our economy. This has given us much greater latitude to make substantial new investments in school renovations and to offer the best possible services to our young people, both today and in the future. We have also embarked on a major review process centred on the idea of educational success. What must we do, we asked, to ensure that each young person has the means to develop his or her full potential in school and, subsequently, to contribute fully to our society? During the public consultations held in the fall of 2016, everyone had an opportunity to express their views on the matter.
    [Show full text]