DOCSLIB.ORG

Tablet PC Magazine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tablet PC Magazine PCM 044, Tablet PC insert 3/12/02 10:11 AM Page 3 ▲ ▲ Tablet PC Update ▲ ▲ The TPC Team ▲ ▲ TPC Technologies ▲ ▲ Hardware OEMs ▲ ▲ What’s next? www.tabletpcmagazine.com spring 2002 volume 1 issue 1 IN THIS ISSUE: HOW WILL THE TABLET PC 2002 Technology update WORK Convertible vs “Pure” Tablet FOR Compaq Tablet PC YOU? Prototype Interviews with Tablet PC movers and shakers POWERED BY How is the Tablet PC PEN COMPUTING MAGAZINE different from the COMING SOON TO A NEWSSTAND NNootteebbooookk?? NEAR YOU PCM 044, Tablet PC insert 3/12/02 10:11 AM Page A2 U P D ATE By Geoff Walker Tablet PC Update Lots of CHANGES AT A GLANCE MANY CHANGES HAVE TAKEN PLACE IN THE TABLET PC publicity, PROJECT DURING THE EIGHT MONTHS SINCE THE FIRST yet Microsoft ARTICLE. The important changes can be summarized as follows: ● Microsoft has made minor changes in the Tablet PC positioning plays it close ● More OEMs and ODMs have joined the project and announced to the vest. their intentions ● A number of OEMs and ODMs showed hardware prototypes at Here is Comdex 2001 what has ● “Windows XP Tablet PC Edition” was announced at Comdex 2001 happened ● XP Tablet was promoted from an “add-on” to a full-fledged with the version of Windows ● The Beta-1 version of XP Tablet and the associated SDK were Tablet PC released in October since the ● Microsoft published the Tablet PC Hardware Require- ments document initial Tablet All of the changes can be grouped into four major categories: (1) marketing, PC feature (2) the Tablet PC OEMs & ODMs, (3) software, and in the (4) hardware. July 2001 Tablet PC is now positioned as a MARKETING “pure superset of today’s laptop PCs.” The Tablet PC marketing issue of Positioning team is making sure that the The Tablet PC is still the “evolu- Tablet PC is not seen as a “laptop Pen tion of the laptop,” but there have without a keyboard,” as I de- been subtle changes in scribed it in July 2001. The Tablet Microsoft’s Eddie Wu and Robert Williams Computing Microsoft’s messaging. The PC is now clearly identified (e.g. A2 PCM 044, Tablet PC insert 3/12/02 10:11 AM Page A3 in the FAQ on the Microsoft ing pure tablets. In retro- PCs to sell in the range of $1,600 website) as having “attahced or spect, perhaps Microsoft to $2,300. detachable keyboards.” The should have tried even • In a story in eWeek, Ted following extract from the Mi- harder than they did to get Clark, vice president crosoft Tablet PC website clearly more OEMs to build convert- of the Tablet PC illustrates the new positioning: ibles. (See the sidebar on group at Compaq, “First and foremost, the Tablet convertibles for a brief history said that he PC is a pure superset of today’s of the convertible genre.) expected Compaq’s laptop PCs. In fact, many Tablet Tablet PCs to cost several hundred PCs will look exactly like today’s Target Market dollars more than a comparable traditional clamshell designs In Alex Loeb’s Tablet PC strategy laptop. complete with a full keyboard but presentation at WinHEC 2001, she • A story on ZDNet reported that will have a mechanism that identified the “corporate worker OF INTEREST Tablet PCs are expected to cost converts the hardware into a [who] spends a significant about $2,000 and may come down slate form. Others will have a amount of time away from [their] “We see the in price as manufacturers increase pure slate form factor. Regard- desk in formal or informal meet- volumes. less of the design, Tablet PCs will ings” (a corridor cruiser) as majority of • Bill Gates, in an interview with be among the most mobile PC “Microsoft’s first focus.” In light Information Week, said he expects ever made, with exceptionally of Microsoft’s current emphasis portable PCs that most computer manufacturers long battery life, light weight, and on the Tablet PC as a “pure will price their Tablet PCs in rough- many with built in wireless capa- superset of today’s laptop PC,” I shipped to be ly the same range as today’s busi- bility. But the Tablet PC is more believe that Microsoft’s “first ness laptops. than just a great laptop. It also focus” has shifted to the road Based on all available informa- enables users to run Windows warrior who wants to replace Tablet PCs within tion, it seems very clear at this and Windows applications using their existing ultraportable lap- point that essentially all of the a pen, annotate documents, tops. This belief is supported by five years.” Tablet PCs currently under devel- create handwritten documents Alex’s statement in the Q&A on Alex Loeb, Microsoft using “digital ink” for later refer- page A13 that “many will see ence or even conversion into the value in replacing their text. Just like today’s portable current laptops [with Tablet PCs, Tablet PCs can be put into a PCs] right away.” docking station at a desk to support a large screen monitor, Pricing mouse and full size keyboard. When asked about pricing, Either as a pure slate or as a Microsoft always says that convertible model the Tablet PC Tablet PC pricing will be deter- is the evolution of the laptop – all mined solely by the OEMs the functionality of a laptop with (which of course is true). A few added Tablet functionality.” relevant comments on pricing The positioning is especially appeared in the media shortly obvious when Microsoft market- after Comdex 2001, as follows: ing managers use the Acer proto- • In a story in Computerworld, type convertible (first shown by David Lee, director of mobile Bill Gates in his Comdex 2001 product marking at Taiwan- keynote) as their primary demo based Acer, said he expects machine. A single sample of that the machines to sell for less prototype is worth thousands of than $2,000. A story in PC World words. It’s so obviously a laptop, said that Acer expects to price and yet, when the screen is its convertible Tablet PC at flipped around, it’s a pure tablet about the same as a laptop with (slate). It brings home the “super- a 10-inch display. set of the laptop” message so • In the same story in Comput- strongly that it makes me feel a erworld, Kyle Thornton, a prod- little sorry for the majority of the uct marketing manager at Mike Hockey shows Compaq Tablet PC concept at Fall Comdex 2001 Tablet PC OEMs who are creat- Fujitsu, said he expects Tablet w w w . t a b l e t p c m a g a z i n e . c o m T a b l e t P C S p r i n g 2 0 0 2 PCM 044, Tablet PC insert 3/12/02 10:12 AM Page A4 opment can be categorized as TABLE 1: CONVENTIONAL ULTRAPORTABLE LAPTOPS “ultraportable laptops” from the viewpoint of size, weight, CPU MODEL THICK (IN.) WEIGHT LCD (XGA) CPU STREET PRICE MHz and screen size. Table 1 lists ten ultraportable (business) Compaq Evo N200 0.8 2.5 lbs 10.4" 700 MHz ULV P3 $1,821 laptops currently on the market, Compaq Evo N400c 0.9 3.5 lbs 12.1" 850 MHz P3 $2,110 along with their basic specifica- Dell Latitude C400 1.0 3.6 lbs 12.1" 1.2 GHz P3 $2,638 tions and street price as of Dell Latitude L400 1.0 3.4 lbs 12.1" 700 MHz P3 $2,296 January 2002. The average of Gateway Solo 34350 0.8 3.8 lbs 12.1" 750 MHz P3 $1,878 these ten ultraportable laptops is a 0.9-inch thick unit weighing HP Omnibook 500 1.0 3.5 lbs 12.1" 700 MHz P3 $2,623 3.3 pounds with a 12.1” LCD and KDS ThinNote 376CH 1.0 3.2 lbs 12.1" 600 MHz P3 $1,326 a 770 MHz Pentium III, costing Sharp PC-UM10 0.7 2.9 lbs 12.1" 600 MHz ULV P3 $1,758 $2,083. This average is a very Sony PCG-R505 1.0 3.8 lbs 12.1" 850 MHz P3 $2,135 reasonable target expectation Toshiba Protege 2000 0.7 2.6 lbs 12.1" 750 MHz P3 $2,199 for the first crop of Tablet PCs. Average 0.9 3.3lbs 12.1" 770 MHz P3 $2,083 Notes: All laptops are configured with 20 GB HDD and 256 MB DRAM Volume Estimates Street prices are midpoint of range reported by search engines as of 1/21/02 Anticipated volumes are harder Some adjustments could be made to the average cost shown above. For example, while the con- to nail down than anticipated tract price of a 12.1” XGA LCD in Taiwan today is about $170, the contract price of a 10.4” XGA LCD pricing. Synthesizing all the is about $200 (that’s right, it’s $30 higher, even though it’s smaller, due to much lower production information I’ve collected over volume). In addition, the contract price of an active digitizer is around $50. If the Tablet PC is a the past eight months from convertible, there might be a few extra dollars for the special hinging mechanism. All told, there’s OEMs, ODMs, ISVs, Microsoft probably roughly $100 incremental material cost for a 10.4” Tablet PC compared to the ultraportable laptops in the table.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stanford-PACS-Raikes-Foundation
    Stanford University Center on Philanthropy and Civil Society DRAFT - Design Thinking and Strategic Philanthropy Case Study Raikes Foundation Nadia Roumani, Paul Brest, and Olivia Vagelos August 2015 Contents Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 2 BACKGROUND OF THE RAIKES FOUNDATION ENGAGEMENT ......................................... 4 The Raikes Team’s Starting Hypotheses and Plans ...................................................................... 4 Earlier Research (June - August 2014) .............................................................................................. 6 THE HUMAN CENTERED DESIGN PROCESS (January - June 2015) ................................. 6 Identifying Beneficiaries and Stakeholders .................................................................................... 6 Ethnography, or Empathy ...................................................................................................................... 7 Interviews with donors ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Interviews with experts and stakeholders ................................................................................................... 9 Interviews with Jeff Raikes .................................................................................................................................. 9 Synthesis .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Linux on the Road
    Linux on the Road Linux with Laptops, Notebooks, PDAs, Mobile Phones and Other Portable Devices Werner Heuser <wehe[AT]tuxmobil.org> Linux Mobile Edition Edition Version 3.22 TuxMobil Berlin Copyright © 2000-2011 Werner Heuser 2011-12-12 Revision History Revision 3.22 2011-12-12 Revised by: wh The address of the opensuse-mobile mailing list has been added, a section power management for graphics cards has been added, a short description of Intel's LinuxPowerTop project has been added, all references to Suspend2 have been changed to TuxOnIce, links to OpenSync and Funambol syncronization packages have been added, some notes about SSDs have been added, many URLs have been checked and some minor improvements have been made. Revision 3.21 2005-11-14 Revised by: wh Some more typos have been fixed. Revision 3.20 2005-11-14 Revised by: wh Some typos have been fixed. Revision 3.19 2005-11-14 Revised by: wh A link to keytouch has been added, minor changes have been made. Revision 3.18 2005-10-10 Revised by: wh Some URLs have been updated, spelling has been corrected, minor changes have been made. Revision 3.17.1 2005-09-28 Revised by: sh A technical and a language review have been performed by Sebastian Henschel. Numerous bugs have been fixed and many URLs have been updated. Revision 3.17 2005-08-28 Revised by: wh Some more tools added to external monitor/projector section, link to Zaurus Development with Damn Small Linux added to cross-compile section, some additions about acoustic management for hard disks added, references to X.org added to X11 sections, link to laptop-mode-tools added, some URLs updated, spelling cleaned, minor changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Advantage of the SAS System on Windows NT
    Taking advantage of the SAS System on Windows NT Mark W. Cates, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC ABSTRACT Unless specified, all the SAS System products and features are provided on both Windows NT Windows NT is fast becoming the universal Workstation and Windows NT Server. This desktop client operating system as well as an paper assumes the current release of Windows important file and compute server for mission NT is Version 4.0. For brevity, the abbreviation critical applications. This paper presents a NT will be used for Windows NT. discussion of the state of Windows NT and how the SAS System Release 6.12 for Windows takes advantage and integrates with the operating Windows Family - Single Executable Image system. Areas such as the user interface, OLE and Web integration are presented. Data access Windows NT is now in its full 3rd generation, and Microsoft BackOffice integration, and with the release of Windows NT Workstation hardware considerations are also presented. 4.0 and Windows NT Server 4.0. NT Workstation and NT Server share the same microkernel, and is portable to several RISC INTRODUCTION platforms, including DEC Alpha AXP, and the PowerPC Prep Platforms. The MIPS chip Microsoft Windows NT sales grew dramatically is no longer supported by Windows NT. The in 1996, as many corporations which have been majority of NT installations still run on the Intel investigating Windows NT have now begun to Pentium® and Pentium Pro® processor. The deploy Windows NT for the client desktop. SAS System Release 6.12 only supports the Intel Many of these deployments were replacing platform, and the Pentium Pro processor is ® Windows 3.1 and Windows 95 .
    [Show full text]
  • HP Pavilion Ze4100 Notebook PC / Compaq Evo Notebook N1010v
    HP Pavilion ze4100 Notebook PC Compaq Evo Notebook N1010v Series Compaq Presario 1100 Series Mobile PC Technology Code KE Service Manual © 2002 Hewlett-Packard Company Microsoft and Windows are trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the U.S. and/or other countries. Intel, Celeron, and Pentium are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and/or other countries. All other product names mentioned herein may be trademarks of their respective companies. HP shall not be liable for technical or editorial errors or omissions contained herein or for incidental or consequential damages in connection with the furnishing, performance, or use of this material. The information in this document is provided “as is” without warranty of any kind, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, and is subject to change without notice. The warranties for HP products are set forth in the express limited warranty statements accompanying such products. Nothing herein should be construed as constituting an additional warranty. This document contains proprietary information that is protected by copyright. No part of this document may be photocopied, reproduced, or translated to another language without the prior written consent of Hewlett-Packard Company. Service Manual First Edition October 2002 Reference Number: N1010v/1100/ze4100 Document Part Number: F5761-90006 ii Service Manual Contents Product Information.....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Compaq Insight Manager 7 Technical Reference Guide
    Compaq Insight Manager 7 Technical Reference Guide Part Number 175757-003 April 2002 (Seventh Edition) Product Version: Version 3.1 Compaq Insight Manager 7 helps maximize system uptime and performance and reduces the cost of maintaining the IT infrastructure by providing proactive notification of problems before those problems result in costly downtme and reduced worker productivity. COMPAQ CONFIDENTIAL Codename: Puff Part Number: 175757-003 Last Saved On: 4/4/02 3:20 PM © 2002 Compaq Information Technologies Group, L.P. Compaq, the Compaq logo, Compaq Insight Manager, DeskPro, ProLiant, SmartStart, ActiveUpdate, AlphaServer, Tru64, NonStop, OpenVMS, SoftPaq, and ProSignia are trademarks of Compaq Information Technologies Group, L.P. in the U.S. and/or other countries. Microsoft, MS-DOS, Windows, and Windows NT are trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the U.S. and/or other countries. All othe product names mentioned herein may be trademarks of their respective companies. Compaq shall not be liable for technical or editorial errors or omissions contained herein. The information in this document is provided “as is” without warranty of any kind and is subject to change without notice. The warranties for Compaq products are set forth in the express limited warranty statements accompanying such products. Nothing herein should be construed as constituting an additional warranty. Compaq Insight Manager 7 Technical Reference Guide April 2002 (Seventh Edition) Part Number 175757-003 COMPAQ CONFIDENTIAL Codename: Puff Part Number: 175757-003
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating Choices of Appropriate Devices for One-To-One Computing Initiatives in Schools Worldwide
    International Journal of Information and Education Technology, Vol. 6, No. 10, October 2016 Investigating Choices of Appropriate Devices for One-to-One Computing Initiatives in Schools Worldwide M. Sirajul Islam and Annika Andersson schools should be governed by “creating an environment in Abstract—The use of technology in schools is rapidly which the child will become highly involved in experience of increasing – today most notably through the one-to-one (1:1) a kind to provide rich soil for the growth in intuitions and programs that are being implemented all around the world. concepts for dealing with thinking, learning, playing, and so Considering how new technologies are emerging fast and obsoleting others in schools, there is a need to continuously on” [5]. In this direction, one of the first practical initiatives monitor and understand the features of various devices in terms on implementing constructionist learning for children with of embedded technology and interaction with users. This paper computers was the development of programming language therefore presents the nature of computing devices used in 1:1 called „Logo‟ in 1967. Following such initiatives, Alan C. computing programs in schools around the world, including Kay, who was closely associated with Papert for promoting investigating the benefits and drawbacks, by means of a and implementing computer based educational constructivism, systematic literature review and a survey conducted in some schools in Sweden. The paper also presents findings based on developed a laptop computer for children in 1970 based on how the various uses of technology affect cooperation practices the sketches of the KiddiComp called „Daynabook‟ as well as personal exploration.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing X.400 Backbones a Guide for Planners and Support Staff
    Implementing X.400 Backbones A Guide for Planners and Support Staff David Ferris Cemil Betanov Ferris Research information for planners and implementers of enterprise messaging Copyright ©1995 by Ferris Research, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited without permission. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, photocopying, mechanical, recording, known today or hereafter invented—without the prior written permission of Ferris Research. The material contained herein is based on information Ferris Research believes is reliable, but its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. No liability is assumed for the use of any materials presented herein, nor for any errors or ommisions which may remain. Copyright ©1995 by Ferris Research, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited without permission. For Jean and Nicholas For Rossana, Emile, and Adrian Table of Contents Sponsor Credits Preface iii How the Report is Organized iii Development Method iv Product Assessments iv Development Team vii David Ferris, Editor and Principal Investigator vii Cemil Betanov, Co-Author vii About Ferris Research viii Authors' Thanks ix Executive Summary xi Report Highlights xii Alternative Technologies xii Message Transfer System xii Directories xiii Gateways xiii APIs xiii Management xiii X.400 UAs xiv ADMDs xiv Other xv 1. Introduction 17 1.1 Messaging System Services 17 Fundamental Services 19 Message Preparation Services 19 Message Store Services 20
    [Show full text]
  • Linux Laptop-HOWTO
    Linux Laptop−HOWTO Linux Laptop−HOWTO Table of Contents Linux Laptop−HOWTO.....................................................................................................................................1 Werner Heuser <[email protected]>...................................................................................................1 1. Preface..................................................................................................................................................1 2. Copyright, Disclaimer and Trademarks...............................................................................................1 3. Which Laptop to Buy?.........................................................................................................................1 4. Laptop Distribution..............................................................................................................................1 5. Installation...........................................................................................................................................2 6. Hardware In Detail...............................................................................................................................2 7. Palmtops, Personal Digital Assistants − PDAs, Handheld PCs − HPCs.............................................2 8. Cellular Phones, Pagers, Calculators, Digital Cameras, Wearable Computing...................................2 9. Accessories..........................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Review Dell Latitude D430 Subnotebook - Notebookcheck.Net Reviews Page 1 of 5
    Review Dell Latitude D430 Subnotebook - Notebookcheck.net Reviews Page 1 of 5 Home News Reviews FAQ / Tips / Technics Purchase Consultation Library Search Jobs Contact Review Dell Latitude D430 Subnotebook Road Warrior. The Dell Latitude D430 proves to be an exemplary companion in our review. The up to now smallest no the Latitude series is quiet, compact, light, and its workmanship is good. The runtime of the small 42 Wh is due to special energy-saving components up to 6 hours. Despite being equipped with low-energy com the frugal Core 2 Duo processor with 1.2 GHz clock rate combined with very fast SSD hard disk is suffic powerful for daily business. Reviewed: Dell Latitude D430 Subnotebook Notebook specifications Dell Latitude D430 :: Processor Intel Core 2 Duo U7600 1.2 GHz (Intel Core 2 Duo) Working for Notebookcheck :: Mainboard Are you a loyal reader of notebookcheck? Are you the one Intel 945GMS all your friends turn to when they want to buy a laptop or :: Memory tablet-PC? Are you a techie who knows how to write? 1024 MB, PC2-4200, 266 MHz Case Then join our Team! :: Graphics adapter The 12 inch Dell Latitude D430 by Dell, an American direct shipper, is up to now the smallest notebook Intel Graphics Media Accelerator Especially wanted: Latitude series. It was especially designed for business customers. So, the choice of forms and colou (GMA) 950 Senior Editor - Details here German-English-Translator - Details here business-like too. Bright grey and black dominate the look of this light portable computer, which weigh :: Display 1.5 kg.
    [Show full text]
  • Compaq Evo D310 Microtower Compaq, the Compaq Logo, Evo, HP and the HP Logo Are Trademarks of Hewlett-Packard Development Company, Illustrated Parts Map L.P
    © 2002, 2005 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P Compaq Evo D310 Microtower Compaq, the Compaq logo, Evo, HP and the HP logo are trademarks of Hewlett-Packard Development Company, Illustrated Parts Map L.P. Compaq Evo Family of Personal Computers Intel, Celeron, and Pentium are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the United States and other countries. Microtower Models All other product names mentioned herein may be trademarks of their respective companies. HP shall not be liable for technical or editorial errors or omissions contained herein. The information in this document is provided “as is” without warranty of any kind and is subject to change without notice. The warranties for HP products are set forth in the express limited warranty statements accompanying such products. Nothing herein should be construed as constituting an additional warranty. Standard and Optional Boards December 2005 1 System board for Intel processor, with thermal 283983-001 grease June 2002 Memory Modules 2 128 MB RAM, DDR 285648-001 Document Part Number 292400-002 * 256 MB RAM, DDR 285649-001 s * 512 MB RAM, DDR 285650-001 Miscellaneous Boards b 3 Front audio/USB I/O board 284247-001 * Lucent PCI Modem 239411-001 * 3COM NIC 253951-001 Intel Celeron Processors with thermal grease 4 1.7 GHz 288691-001 * 1.8 GHz 288692-001 * 2.0 GHz 309578-001 Intel Pentium P4 Processors with thermal grease 4 2.26 GHz\512K cache 288688-001 * 2.4 GHz\512K cache 288689-001 * 2.0 GHz\512K cache 273051-001 * 1.9 GHz\256K cache 255436-001 * 1.8 GHz\256K cache 255435-001 1.7 GHz\256K
    [Show full text]
  • Autodesk and Autocad
    Chapter 8 Autodesk and AutoCAD Autodesk as a company, has gone through several distinct phases of life. There were the “Early Years” which covers the time from when Autodesk was founded as a loose programmer-centric collaborative in early 1982 to the company’s initial public offering in 1985, the “Adolescent Years” during which the company grew rapidly but seemed to do so without any clear direction and the “Mature Years.” The beginning of the latter phase began when Carol Bartz became president and CEO in 1992 and continues to the current time. Even under Bartz, there were several well defined periods of growth as well as some fairly stagnant years.1 Mike Riddle gets hooked on computers Mike Riddle was born in California with computers in his veins. In junior high school, he built his first computer out of relays. It didn’t work very well, but it convinced him that computers were going to be an important part of his life. After attending Arizona State University, Riddle went to work for a steel fabricator where he had his first exposure to CAD. The company had a $250,000 Computervision system that, although capable of 3D work, was used strictly for 2D drafting. The company was engaged in doing steel detailing for the Palo Verde nuclear power plant in Arizona. Riddle felt that anything they were doing on this project with the Computervision system could be done on a microcomputer-based system. About the same time Riddle began working at a local Computerland store where they provided him with free computer time to do with as he wanted.
    [Show full text]
  • Linux Hardware Compatibility HOWTO
    Linux Hardware Compatibility HOWTO Steven Pritchard Southern Illinois Linux Users Group [email protected] 3.1.5 Copyright © 2001−2002 by Steven Pritchard Copyright © 1997−1999 by Patrick Reijnen 2002−03−28 This document attempts to list most of the hardware known to be either supported or unsupported under Linux. Linux Hardware Compatibility HOWTO Table of Contents 1. Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1 1.1. Notes on binary−only drivers...........................................................................................................1 1.2. Notes on commercial drivers............................................................................................................1 1.3. System architectures.........................................................................................................................1 1.4. Related sources of information.........................................................................................................2 1.5. Known problems with this document...............................................................................................2 1.6. New versions of this document.........................................................................................................2 1.7. Feedback and corrections..................................................................................................................3 1.8. Acknowledgments.............................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]