DOCSLIB.ORG

Creatinggreat CREATIVE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Great Creative By Taren Grom Creating GREAT CREATIVE In this agency roundtable, creative experts provide their insights on the key ingredients that make up a great creative ad — that creative “something else” — how the creative process has changed as a result of increasing media channels, and where they draw creative inspiration. he Creative Key Elements makes people want to engage. So that some- insight; a real, definable point of differentia- thing else becomes the sum of all the parts tion; relevance to the target audience; one big T One marketing expert has stated working together to create a presence that idea; brilliant headline; killer image; great de- that in addition to hard work, there are usually demands attention and makes the audience sign; engaging user experience; unique use of four key elements in a great ad: a disruptive feel something. selected media; and campaign flexibility across and relevant visual, strong brand identifi- multiple channels. cation, a brilliant headline, and “something JACK HYNDMAN The something else is simplicity. Charles else.” Industry creative experts discuss what Head of Creative, Fingerpaint Mingus said that “making the simple com- they believe are the key elements in a great ad plicated is commonplace; making the compli- and provide what they believe is that some- The key elements of a great ad are one great cated simple, awesomely simple, that’s creativ- thing else. ity.” Complexity is the necessary input to the Advertising is an art form, PharmaVOICEcreative process; simplicity is the output — it NORBERT DE LACLOS has to be in order for ideas and brands to break Chief Creative Officer, Natrel and like any other art through in today’s cluttered media landscape. form, we have to factor in The way information has permeated the intangible element of STEVE HAMBURG our lives from all sides, breakthrough that makes people want Partner, Chief Creative Officer, Calcium creative is more important than ever to engage. before. And customers — patients and First and foremost, a great ad is powered by an clinicians — are bombarded across a va- LOUIS MASSAIA enormous idea, and such ideas are generated riety of medical content channels every Palio, an inVentiv Health as a result of insight, intellect, imagina- day. With so much information out tion, and, yes, inspiration. A great ad company there, the risk of the audience tuning rewires the way we think. It delivers out or turning away has increased sig- a cognitive jolt and gets our neurons nificantly. That said, if the client/agency team firing in new and interesting ways. A has pushed the brand to a truly compelling great ad surprises us, wakes us up out place and it is firmly established in the mar- of our slumbers, and makes us pay ket, we don’t necessarily need the “something attention and take notice, which is else.” The key challenge at that point is main- no small feat in this distracted age taining brand consistency and exploring new of ours. channels. It’s at launch that the “something A great ad works holistically, else” may be needed. with all the constituent parts work- ing together in a kind of organic LOUIS MASSAIA harmony. This makes a great ad a Executive CreativeCompliments Director, Palio, an living and breathing thing. You inVentiv Health company can’t alter one element without fun- damentally changing the whole en- I believe that the something else comes down chilada. It’s possible to have brilliant to whether or not the ad is capable of captur- copy and brilliant design without ing a feeling. That’s the magic factor, and it having a great ad. Why? Because (c) PharmaLinx LLC. Rights do not include promotional use. For distribution or printing rights, contact [email protected] separates the good from the great. Advertising it’s not the individual elements but is an art form, and like any other art form, we the interaction between elements that have to factor in the intangible element that can give an ad the pulse of greatness. 16 March 2016 PharmaVOICE Great Creative Great creative excites us by taking us to a new place. And that, I believe, is the “some- thing else” variable. Has the ad transported us to new feelings, thoughts, and perceptions? Has it given us a new and memorable expe- rience? Has it expanded our cultural vocab- A great ad is powered by an ulary? Great creative does more than entice enormous idea, and such ideas and engage; it rewards and enriches. It tells a are generated as a result of powerful story that we can powerfully relate to because, on some level, the story is about us. insight, intellect, imagination, and, yes, inspiration. RICHARD CAMPBELL Partner, MRB Partners STEVE HAMBURG Calcium First, there needs to be a clear attitude. Brand personalities are often created by committee and stretched in contradictory directions: e.g., a warm-and-fuzzy revolutionary. By contrast, a finely drawn brand personality focuses creative to understand what you’re offering energy and results in work that connects with but also care that it’s worth their customers. Second, there has to be a relentless interest. A former colleague called Great ads evoke an focus on a single strategic benefit. Even a this characteristic resonance — not echo of emotional world full of feature geeks wants to know how a bad way to express it. identification in the a product improves lives. Single-mindedness viewer. is its own reward: By saying one thing well, BENTON INGERSOLL it’s easier for the audience to remember it. Co-founder and Content BENTON INGERSOLL Third, there must be a tight fit between copy Director, Minds + Assembly Minds + Assembly and art. Make one say something that the other doesn’t, and copy and art will say more Déjà vu is the missing element. together than either alone. It’s an additive ef- Great ads evoke an echo of emo- fect. The moments effort for viewers to put the tional identification in the viewer.PharmaVOICE pieces together and “get it” provides a small You feel deep down inside that reward that makes the story more memorable. you’ve felt or known whatever the The something else is making the audience ad is conveying and that gives you care. More than just being comprehended, a thrill, which then ofbecomes asso- the story has to engage the customers’ hearts ciated with the brand. As for the and minds to compel behavior. People have other pieces — visual, brand ID, and headline GRAHAM MILLS — those may be elements of great advertising, Global Chief Creative Officer, Digitas but they don’t have to all be present. In fact, Health LifeBrands, Publicis Life Brands, and there’s such a thing as too much of a good Heartbeat Ideas thing. A super-clever headline paired with a super-clever visual is often super-annoying. What I look for is a sense of connection and The last thing is that execution itself, the pho- identifying a purpose between the brand and tography or illustration, the type design and the audience. Today, as brands become bigger layout, can easily win the day. than advertising, it’s about feeding a long con- nection, such as how does this brand fit into a STEPHEN NEALE patient’s life. How does it make a difference? Senior VP, Executive Creative Director, How does the story fit into a patient’s journey? AbelsonTaylor We’re not selling graham crackers; there has to be that connection. To us, a great ad must meet five criteria: it The other thing I look for is simplicity. gets the message across quickly, it evokes a Sometimes I think we are coaxed into telling strong emotion, it’s campaign-able, it’s rele- overly complicated stories. It’s better to figure We’re using our creativeCompliments abilities vant, and it’s distinct or breaks through the out what the one thing is that needs to be said for the greater good — promoting visual clutter. We think that engagement is and say that and then let the other stuff be products that are saving or improving the je ne sais quoi, the critical element that el- discovered as people engage with the brand. lives. That in itself, is inspiring. evates great ad campaigns today. This critical element gets viewers to become participants. AMY HANSEN STEPHEN NEALE It moves them beyond the words and pictures, Senior VP, Creative Director, HCB Health (c) PharmaLinx LLC. Rights do not include promotional use. For distribution or printing rights, contact [email protected] AbelsonTaylor and regardless of the medium — print, digital, broadcast — gives them a reason to act and No matter how much new technology and return, ultimately becoming loyalists. media mess with the definition of an ad, one PharmaVOICE March 2016 17 Great Creative thing remains the same: it requires great forms. There has to be a virility to it, if you ative. Experientially speaking, a website is perseverance to push through the mediocre, will, to make an ad truly great. very different from a print ad, a TV campaign the see-say, the overdone, the obvious, the very different from an electronic sales aid. To self-serving, the self-doubt, the judgment, the The Creative Process maximize creative effectiveness, we must have panic attacks, and the sheer exhaustion that a deep understanding of what makes each me- threaten greatness. We hold in our imagina- With so many media — print, TV, digi- dium tick — or click — and a strong ability to tion the power to move people, to give them tal, social, etc. — available today for message tailor our creative expression to fit the unique chills or goose bumps; to touch their hearts delivery, our agency experts discuss how the properties of different mediums.
Recommended publications
  • Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association

    Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association

    September 2007 Volume 81, Issue 1 Proceedings and Addresses of The American Philosophical Association apa THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL ASSOCIATION Eastern Division Program University of Delaware Newark, DE 19716 www.apaonline.org The American Philosophical Association Eastern Division One Hundred Fourth Annual Meeting Marriott Waterfront Hotel Baltimore, MD December 27 - 30, 2007 Proceedings and Addresses of The American Philosophical Association Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association (ISSN 0065-972X) is published five times each year and is distributed to members of the APA as a benefit of membership and to libraries, departments, and institutions for $75 per year. It is published by The American Philosophical Association, 31 Amstel Ave., University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716. Second-Class Postage Paid at Newark, DE and additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Proceedings and Addresses, The American Philosophical Association, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716. Editor: David E. Schrader Phone: (302) 831-1112 Publications Coordinator: Erin Shepherd Fax: (302) 831-8690 Associate Editor: Richard Bett Web: www.apaonline.org Meeting Coordinator: Linda Smallbrook Proceedings and Addresses of The American Philosophical Association, the major publication of The American Philosophical Association, is published five times each academic year in the months of September, November, January, February, and May. Each annual volume contains the programs for the meetings of the three Divisions; the membership list; Presidential Addresses; news of the Association, its Divisions and Committees, and announcements of interest to philosophers. Other items of interest to the community of philosophers may be included by decision of the Editor or the APA Board of Officers.
  • 9:30 - 11:00 SZB, Room 240

    9:30 - 11:00 SZB, Room 240

    PHILOSOPHY OF LANGUAGE Department of Philosophy, UT, Austin Phil 332, Spring 2013 Unique Number 42755 T/TH: 9:30 - 11:00 SZB, Room 240 INSTRUCTOR Lawrence Ray Buchanan E-mail: [email protected] Phone: (512) 471-7396 Office: Waggener Hall 4th Floor Room # 416B Office hours: Tuesdays 11:30 – 12:30 COURSE SUMMARY The course focuses on various philosophical issues concerning language. Topics to be discussed include, but are not limited to, the following: speaker-meaning, conversational implicature, sentence/expression-meaning, reference, modality, and propositional attitude ascriptions. COURSE REQUIREMENTS Assignments: • Two 6-7 page papers on topics selected from a list of prompts given by instructor. The first of these papers will be worth 20% of the student’s final grade for the course; the second will be worth 25% of the grade for the course. • One in-class midterm worth 25% of the student’s final grade. • A take-home final exam worth 25% of the grade. • Class participation and attendance (5%). Regarding the *participation* component of your grade: I expect regular attendance and participation in our course. Moreover, I expect you to have read the material for lecture carefully in advance. However, should my expectations on either front fail to be met, I reserve the right to assign (short) in-class written assignments regarding the required reading for the day that will then be counted towards the participation component of your grade. Late work: I do not accept work after the due date without a valid documented excuse. Please Note: One of the principal aims of this course is to give students experience with writing in an academic discipline.
  • Representation and Deconstruction of Turkish German Stereotypes Through Gegen Die Wand and Kebab Connections

    Representation and Deconstruction of Turkish German Stereotypes Through Gegen Die Wand and Kebab Connections

    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Supervised Undergraduate Student Research Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects and Creative Work 5-2011 Representation and Deconstruction of Turkish German Stereotypes through Gegen die Wand and Kebab Connections Charli Celine Kerns [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Part of the Other German Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Kerns, Charli Celine, "Representation and Deconstruction of Turkish German Stereotypes through Gegen die Wand and Kebab Connections" (2011). Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/1428 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Representation and Deconstruction of Turkish German Stereotypes through Gegen die Wand and Kebab Connections Charli Kerns Honors Thesis submitted German Section of the Department Of Modern Foreign Languages and Literatures College of Art and Sciences Introduction: When we as the audience watch a film, we step into a world overtly comprised of plot, climax, and resolution. However, in every film, cultural nuances covertly exist that repossess
  • Stephen Neale, Facing Facts, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001, Xv + 254 Pp

    Stephen Neale, Facing Facts, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001, Xv + 254 Pp

    Stephen Neale, Facing Facts, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001, xv + 254 pp. Reviewed by Jaroslav Peregrin, Department of Logic, Institute of Philosophy, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Jilská 1, 110 00 Praha 1, Czech Republic. E-mail: [email protected]. It is now often taken for granted that facts are entia non grata, for there exists a powerful argument (dubbed the slingshot), which is backed by such great names as Frege or Gödel or Davidson (and so could hardly be wrong), that discredits their existence. There indeed is such an argument, and it indeed is not wrong on the straightforward sense of wrong. However, in how far it knocks down any conception of facts is another story, a story which is anything but simple and perspicuous. In his book, Stephen Neale takes pains to excavate the origins of the argument and the presuppositions which it needs to be usable for the purpose of exorcising facts. In the introduction of the book, Neale expresses his conviction that his analysis of the slingshot will not only compromise its usability for the purpose of discrediting facts, but also save representationalist conceptions of language and mind from the attacks of the anti- representationalist philosophers like Davidson and Rorty. „Representational philosophy,“ he claims, „survives the Davidson-Rorty onslaught because non-truth-functional logics and ontologies of facts, states of affairs, situations and propositions survive not only the actual arguments deployed against them, but also the most precise and powerful slingshot arguments that can be constructed.“ However, what he does take his analyses to show is that „the most precise and powerful slingshot arguments demonstrate conclusively that the logical and ontological theories originally targeted must satisfy non-trivial conditions if they are to avoid logical or ontological collapse.“ (P.
  • Review of "Bertrand Russell De La Logique À La Politique", Special Issue of Herm

    Review of "Bertrand Russell De La Logique À La Politique", Special Issue of Herm

    Reviews 103 A FRENCH PERSPECTIVE ON RUSSELL ALASDAIR URQUHART Philosophy / University ofToronto Toronto, Ont., Canada M5S IAI Bertrand Russell de fa logique a fa politique. Hermes. NO.7 (1990). Paris: Edi­ tions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. Pp. ii, 303. 8sE he new journal Hermes, which first appeared in 1988, bears the subtitle T "Cognition, Communication, Politique" and has set itself the admirable goal of introducing French readers to analytic philosophy, theories of ethics, and systems theory, in order to rescue internal French debate from the bog in which it is stuck. The publication of the present volume, containing a varied 104 Reviews Reviaus 105 collection of essays on both the technical and political writings of Russell, opens with an admirable essay by Alan Ryan; this is not a summary of his testifies to increasing French interest in Russell, an interest shown also in the recent book, but a clearly written critical discussion of the philosophical recent publication of a collection of Russell's writings on philosophical logic background of Russell's political writings, his ambivalence towards pacifism, (introduced and translated by J. M.. Roy), and of new translations (by Fran­ and his relationship with his public. Adam Stephenson expresses dissatisfac­ rrois Rivenc) of The Problems ofPhilosophy and Introduction to Mathematical tion that Russell never produced his grand work of Hegelian synthesis; this Philosophy. failure is blamed on Russell's atomism and individualism, which leave man a The first part of the collection is devoted to philosophy and logic. In the "metaphysical orphan". Dominique Colas provides a brief and sympathetic opening section of this part, on logic and ontology, Philippe de Rouilhan note on Russell's trip to the Soviet Union.
  • Putnam and Davidson on Coherence, Truth, and Justification

    Putnam and Davidson on Coherence, Truth, and Justification

    The Science of Mind (精神科学) 54 (2016), pp. 51-70. Putnam and Davidson on Coherence, Truth, and Justification Lajos L. Brons Nihon University In the early 1980s both Donald Davidson and Hilary Putnam defended theories that superficially appear to be coherence theories of truth, but that upon closer inspection turn out to be better understood as coherence theories of justification (or perhaps, not as coherence theories at all). In Reason, Truth and History (1981a), Putnam argued that “truth is an idealization of rational acceptability” (55), and that rational acceptability of statements is their “coherence and fit” (id.). And in the same year Davidson gave a talk that would be published two years later as “A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge” (1983) in which he defended “what may as well be called a coherence theory of truth and knowledge” (137). There are more interesting similarities between Putnam’s and Davidson’s theories than their closeness in dates of birth, however, and in later work Putnam’s theory further converged with Davidson’s. Furthermore, the most conspicuous difference – the role and nature of “conceptual schemes” – turns out to be smaller and more subtle than it may seem at a first glance. This paper introduces Putnam’s and Davidson’s coherence theories, and discusses the most important differences and similarities. The following two sections summarize “middle” Putnam’s and Davidson’s coherence theories respectively. The two sections after that look into the apparent disagreement on the possibility of different conceptual schemes, and discuss further developments in Putnam’s view and the consequent convergence of Putnam’s and Davidson’s coherentisms.
  • Rafts, Boats, and Cruise Ships Verhaegh, Sander

    Rafts, Boats, and Cruise Ships Verhaegh, Sander

    University of Groningen Rafts, Boats, and Cruise Ships Verhaegh, Sander IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2015 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Verhaegh, S. (2015). Rafts, Boats, and Cruise Ships: Naturalism and holism in Quine’s philosophy. University of Groningen. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 02-10-2021 RAFTS, BOATS, AND CRUISE SHIPS Naturalism and Holism in Quine’s Philosophy SANDER VERHAEGH RAFTS,BOATS,ANDCRUISESHIPS © Sander Verhaegh, Groningen, 2015 Cover design: Anne Jansen.
  • Proceedings Vol. 86, No. 1

    Proceedings Vol. 86, No. 1

    September 2012 Volume 86, Issue 1 Proceedings and Addresses of The American Philosophical Association apa The AmericAn PhilosoPhicAl AssociATion Eastern Division Program University of Delaware Newark, DE 19716 www.apaonline.org The American Philosophical Association Eastern Division One Hundred Ninth Annual Meeting Marriott Atlanta Marquis Atlanta, GA December 27 - 30, 2012 Proceedings and Addresses of The American Philosophical Association Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association (ISSN 0065-972X) is published five times each year and is distributed to members of the APA as a benefit of membership and to libraries, departments, and institutions for $75 per year. It is published by The American Philosophical Association, 31 Amstel Ave., University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716. Periodicals Postage Paid at Newark, DE and additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Proceedings and Addresses, The American Philosophical Association, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716. Editor: Amy E. Ferrer Phone: (302) 831-1112 Publications Coordinator: Erin Shepherd Fax: (302) 831-8690 Associate Editor: Richard Bett Web: www.apaonline.org Meeting Coordinator: Linda Smallbrook Proceedings and Addresses of The American Philosophical Association, the major publication of The American Philosophical Association, is published five times each academic year in the months of September, November, January, February, and May. Each annual volume contains the programs for the meetings of the three Divisions; the membership list; Presidential Addresses; news of the Association, its Divisions and Committees, and announcements of interest to philosophers. Other items of interest to the community of philosophers may be included by decision of the editor or the APA Board of Officers.
  • Dissertation Deposit Draft

    Dissertation Deposit Draft

    SPEECH ACT THEORETIC SEMANTICS by DANIEL W. HARRIS A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Philosophy in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2014 ii © 2014 DANIEL WALLACE HARRIS All Rights Reserved iii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Philosophy in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Gary Ostertag ______________ ____________________________________________________ Date Chair of Examining Committee Iakovos Vasiliou ______________ ____________________________________________________ Date Executive Officer Ernie Lepore Michael Devitt David Rosenthal Stephen Neale ____________________ Supervisory Committee THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iv Abstract SPEECH ACT THEORETIC SEMANTICS by Daniel W. Harris Adviser: Professor Stephen Neale Abstract: I defend the view that linguistic meaning is a relation borne by an expression to a type of speech act, and that this relation holds in virtue of our overlapping communicative dispositions, and not in virtue of linguistic conventions. I argue that this theory gives the right account of the seman- tics–pragmatics interface and the best-available semantics for non-declarative clauses, and show that it allows for the construction of a rigorous compositional semantic theory with greater ex- planatory power than both truth-conditional and dynamic semantics. v PREFACE & ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Te ideas of Paul Grice have come up ofen during the
  • Pragmatism and Binding

    Pragmatism and Binding

    From Z. Szabó (ed.) Semantics versus Pragmatics, Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 165-285. (Pagination matched as closely as possible) 5 Pragmatism and Binding Stephen Neale* 1. Introduction Names, descriptions, and demonstratives raise well-known logical, ontological, and epistemological problems. Perhaps less well known, amongst philosophers at least, are the ways in which some of these problems not only recur with pronouns but also cross-cut further problems exposed by the study in generative linguistics of morpho-syntactic constraints on interpretation. These problems will be my primary concern here, but I want to address them within a general picture of interpretation that is required if wires are not to be crossed. That picture will be sketched in sections 3 and 4; subsequent sections will focus on pronouns and binding, drawing heavily on what has preceded. * It will be obvious to linguists that this chapter is written by a philosopher, albeit one very sympathetic to the generative enterprise as articulated over the years by Noam Chomsky. Chomsky’s ideas permeate both the syntactic and philosophical theses pushed here. As I was completing the chapter I was introduced to several works in linguistics I wish I had seen earlier, in particular Bresnan (2001), Elbourne (2001, 2002), Jacobson (1999, 2000), Kayne (2002), Keenan (2002), Reuland (2001a,b), Reuland and Sigurjónsdóttir (1997), Safir (forthcoming), and Szabolcsi (2003). I gesture towards some of these in various footnotes (Very likely I would have gone about certain matters a little differently if I had come across these works earlier; and I am not convinced some of the discussion could not be more usefully formulated within variable-free systems.) I thank the members of the NYU Linguistics Department for inviting me to present this work at their colloquium series— discussion (then and subsequently) with Mark Baltin, Paul Elbourne, Richard Kayne, Paul Postal, Anna Szabolcsi, and Michal Starke was most helpful.
  • NOTES on MINDREADING, METAREPRESENTATION, and MIMESIS Stephen Neale

    NOTES on MINDREADING, METAREPRESENTATION, and MIMESIS Stephen Neale

    NOTES ON MINDREADING, METAREPRESENTATION, AND MIMESIS Stephen Neale We want to understand the relations these abilities bear to one another, in current cognition and evolutionarily: (1) our ability to comprehend expressions (word, phrases, sentences) (2) our ability to interpret utterances (3) our ability to interpret communicative behaviour (4) our ability to interpret intentional behaviour (5) our ability to figure things out (all-purpose reasoning; inference to the best explanation) 1 MINDREADING AND MODULARITY The idea: utterance interpretation—whether we are dealing with linguistic or non-linguistic utterances—is a form of mindreading, construed as the capacity to infer the mental states of others (e.g. beliefs, desires, intentions) from their behaviour. Just an instance? Or a special case involving proprietary capacities? It is widely assumed that answering that question requires understanding the extent to which utterance interpretation is modular. Fodor (1983). Our cognitive architecture contains dedicated input systems (e.g. the perceptual systems). On Fodor’s account they are fast, mandatory, domain-specific, informationally encapsulated. And they manifestly include a linguistic comprehension system. But does this yields representations of sentence meanings? Of what is said? Of what is meant? Cosmides and Tooby (1994), and Pinker (1997) have provided an alternative, evolutionary perspective: Modules are “designed” by natural selection to solve some particular adaptive problem faced by hunter-gatherers in the Pleistocene—finding
  • Three Views of Language & the Mind

    Three Views of Language & the Mind

    Three Views of Language & the Mind Jeffrey Speaks Submitted May 16, 2003 A dissertation presented to the faculty of Princeton University in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Recommended for acceptance by the Department of Philosophy November 2003 c by Jeff Speaks, 2003. All rights reserved. Abstract. The essay which follows is about the relationship between mind and language. Most recent thought about intentionality has it that (i) mental states of individuals are largely, or in the most fundamental cases, independent of social facts about public languages, and (ii) these social facts are derived from, or constituted by, the mental states of individuals. The purpose of this essay is to challenge this individualist orthodoxy (as well as the view of the relationship between mind and action which often accompanies it), and suggest in its place a communitarian picture of intentionality which gives public languages a role to play in the constitution of thought. iii Preface This essay is an attempt to give at least a partial answer to a traditional question about the relative priorities of mind and language: Is language prior to thought, or is thought prior to language? I defend the claim that the truth lies closer to the first of these alternatives than is usually supposed. But, as will become clear quickly in what follows, this simple-sounding traditional question breaks down into a number of different questions about the relationship between specific linguistic and mental phenomena. Because the issues involved with some of these may often seem far removed from our initial question, it will be useful to begin with a brief overview of the structure of what follows.