The Role of Ideology in Boundary Maintenance Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Role of Ideology in Boundary Maintenance Of THE ROLE OF IDEOLOGY IN BOUNDARY MAINTENANCE OF EUROPARTIES By Maria Sedlakova Submitted to Central European University Department of Political Science In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Professor Zsolt Enyedi CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2013 ABSTRACT The paper examines the role of party ideology in boundary maintenance of thirteen Europarties. The focus of the analysis is on the relationship between the Europarties and their national member parties, especially on the conditions that national parties have to fulfill in order to be accepted to the Europarty and what they have to do once they are accepted and function within the Europarty. Based on the qualitative content analysis of the party statutes, internal rules and regulations, the paper argues that ideology influences organizational structure of the Europarties (size of the party, party staff, party finance, decision-making within the party) and thus also how Europarty treats its applicants and members and whether and to what extent Europarty applies control mechanism such as disciplinary measures. First part of the analytical chapter describes party organizations at the European level and identifies factors that influence how selective or inclusive Europarties are. Second part focuses on the two cases studies: one when disciplinary measures were applied (suspension of Slovak party SMER-SD in 2006 from the Party of European Socialists) and one where disciplinary measures were not applied (Hungarian party Fidesz, 2012 and the European People’s Party). CEU eTD Collection i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project would not be possible without the guidance of my supervisor, Professor Zsolt Enyedi. I am grateful for his valuable comments, time and contagious passion about party politics. My gratitude goes to those political elites who in spite of the amount of work and lack of time, expressed their interest in this project. From the European People’s Party, I want to thank Mr. Christian Kremer and Nikolas Briec for their availability and willingness to share their experience and opinions. From the Party of European Socialists, my thanks go to Ms. Katarina Nevedalova and Boguslaw Liberadzki. Furthermore, my gratitude goes to Daniel I. for his insider stories from the European Commission and numerous discussions about Hungarian politics. I also want to thank the International Visegrad Fund for the support in 2012/2013. Finally, I want to thank all my friends and colleagues from the CEU community for an enjoyable intellectual journey and experience. Special thanks go to my family, Mina, Veronika, Samuel and Brian. CEU eTD Collection ii TABLE OF CONTENT Abstract ....................................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................................... ii Table of content ......................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables and Figures .......................................................................................................... v List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................. vi 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 8 2. Europarties: Organizations with Different Structures ...................................................... 12 2.1. Theoretical Framework .............................................................................................. 12 2.1.1. Connecting Boundary Maintenance to Internal Party Structure ........................ 15 2.1.2. Impact of Ideology on Party Structure ............................................................... 20 2.1.3. Formal Rules and Organizations ........................................................................ 22 2.2. Conceptual Framework .............................................................................................. 23 3. Research Design and Methodology .................................................................................. 27 3.1. Methods and Data ...................................................................................................... 27 3.1.1. Analysis of Documents and Content Analysis ................................................... 27 3.1.2. Case studies ........................................................................................................ 29 3.1.3. The use of interview data ................................................................................... 30 4. The Data on Europarty Organizations: Empirical Analysis ............................................. 34 4.1. Three Dimensions of Boundary Maintenance ........................................................... 34 4.2. What influences boundary maintenance? .................................................................. 36 4.2.1. Party Size and Membership Structure ................................................................ 36 4.2.2. Party Staff ........................................................................................................... 41 4.2.3. Party Structure: Decision-making Within the Party ........................................... 43 4.2.4. Party Finance ...................................................................................................... 44 CEU eTD Collection 4.3. The Role of Party Ideology: Discussion .................................................................... 45 5. Case study ............................................................................................................................ 49 5.1. Party of European Socialists and SMER-SD 2006 ........................................................ 49 5.2. European People’s Party and Fidesz 2012 .................................................................... 52 6. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 60 Bibliography ............................................................................................................................. 62 iii Appendix A. ............................................................................................................................. 68 Appendix B .............................................................................................................................. 87 Appendix C .............................................................................................................................. 88 CEU eTD Collection iv LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES Figure 1. Position of the party families Table 1. Operationalization of “selective/inclusive” Table 2. Boundary maintenance of Europarties Table 3. Boundary maintenance of Europarties - summary Table 4. Membership structure by country: EPP and PES compared Table 5. Party staff and staff ratio of Europarties CEU eTD Collection v LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AECR Alliance of European Conservatives and Reformists AENM Alliance of European National Movements ALDE Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe DSS Democratic Party of Serbia EAF European Alliance for Freedom EC European Commission ECPM European Christian Political Movement ECR European Conservatives and Reformists EDP European Democratic Party EDU European Democratic Union EFA European Free Alliance EFD Europe of Freedom and Democracy EGP European Green Party EL Party of European Left ELDR Federation of Liberal, Democratic and Reform Parties of the European Communities EP European Parliament EPP European People’s Party EU European Union EUCD European Union of Christian Democrats EUD EUDemocrats CEU eTD Collection Fidesz Hungarian Civic Union Greens/EFA European Greens–European Free Alliance GUE/NGL European United Left–Nordic Green Left HZDS People’s Party – Movement for a Democratic Slovakia LSDSP Latvian Social Democratic Workers' Party vi MDF Hungarian Democratic Forum MELD Movement for a Europe of Liberties and Democracy PES Party of European Socialists PNTCD Christian-Democratic National Peasants’ Party S&D Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats SMER-SD Direction – Social Democracy SNP Slovak National Party SOC Confederation of the Socialist Parties of the European Community UDF Union of the Democratic Forces CEU eTD Collection vii 1. INTRODUCTION People like me, and our political community, must accept that unfortunately the ideals we represent do not enjoy majority support in this House either. Our ideals are undoubtedly Christian and based on personal responsibility; we find national sentiment to be an important and positive thing, and we believe that families are the foundations of the future. It may be that a great many people believe otherwise, but that makes our position no less a European one. It may be that with this we are in a minority in Europe, but this position is no less a European position, and we are free to represent this conviction. You may disagree with what I will quote now, but I personally profess Schumann’s view that there will either be a Christian democracy in Europe or there will be no democracy at all. This, ladies and gentlemen, is a European position (Viktor Orban in EP 2012). Since 2011 Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has visited the European Parliament
Recommended publications
  • Slovenian Minority in Austria Tereza Smejkalová1
    Slovenian minority in Austria Tereza Smejkalová1 Abstract: This paper will analyse the issue of the Slovenian minority in Austria and focus on its history, development and contemporary concerns as well as attitudes on both sides of this disputed subject. It also stresses the importance of tolerance, democracy and the respect of people’s values, which should be part of the contemporary world and especially of the European Union. If the language and culture of a minority are not adequately respected, the European Union should be concerned and act accordingly. However, in the case of the Slovenian minority this does not occur. Keywords: Slovenia, minority, language policy, and bilingual signposts The autochthonous Slovenian ethnic minority, which is a remnant of former Slavic groups that populated the entire south and east of today’s Austria, now lives in the south Austrian provinces of Carinthia and Styria. Although this minority has had its rights guaranteed by two international treaties – the Saint Germain Peace Treaty of 1919 and the Austrian State Treaty of 1955 – and European conventions, Austria has failed to fully implement them. The Slovenian minority in Styria is not even officially recognised, while ethnic Slovenians in Carinthia have had to fight for every benefit that should have been taken for granted. This status is also indisputably linked to the fact that the former head of the Freedom Party, who has been criticised for his xenophobic and racist statements, is currently the governor of Carinthia. Jorg Haider used the so-called bilingual signpost dispute (“Ortstafelsturm”) in the pre-elections campaign in the summer of 2006 and his actions have dramatically worsened the tensions between the two neighbouring countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Systems in Transition: Slovenia (Vol. 18 No. 3 2016)
    Health Systems in Transition Vol. 18 No. 3 2016 Slovenia Health system review Tit Albreht • Radivoje Pribakovic´ Brinovec Dušan Jošar • Mircha Poldrugovac Tatja Kostnapfel • Metka Zaletel Dimitra Panteli • Anna Maresso Anna Maresso and Dimitra Panteli (Editors) and Ewout van Ginneken (Series editor) were responsible for this HiT Editorial Board Series editors Reinhard Busse, Berlin University of Technology, Germany Josep Figueras, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Martin McKee, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom Elias Mossialos, London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom Ellen Nolte, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Ewout van Ginneken, Berlin University of Technology, Germany Series coordinator Gabriele Pastorino, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Editorial team Jonathan Cylus, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Cristina Hernández-Quevedo, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Marina Karanikolos, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Anna Maresso, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies David McDaid, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Sherry Merkur, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Dimitra Panteli, Berlin University of Technology, Germany Wilm Quentin, Berlin University of Technology, Germany Bernd Rechel, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Erica Richardson, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Anna Sagan, European
    [Show full text]
  • Abbreviations
    AbbreviAtions ABI Associazione Bancaria Italiana (Italian Banking Association) ALD Autonomie Liberté Démocratie (Autonomy Liberty Democracy) ALDE Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe AN Alleanza Nazionale (National Alliance) ANCI Associazione Nazionale Comuni Italiani (National Association of Italian Municipalities) ANM Associazione Nazionale Magistrati (National Magistrates Association) BdI Banca d’Italia (Bank of Italy) BMPS Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena CD Centro Democratico—Diritti e Libertà (Democratic Center—Rights and Freedom) CGIL Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro (Italian General Confederation of Labor) CIR Compagnie Industriali Riunite (an Italian holding company) CISE Centro Italiano Studi Elettorali (Italian Center for Electoral Studies) CISL Confederazione Italiana Sindicati dei Lavoratori (Italian Confederation of Workers’ Trade Unions) CISR Comitato Interministeriale per la Sicurezza della Repubblica (Committee for the Security of the Republic) CLN Comitato di Liberazione Nazionale (National Liberation Committee) CN Centrodestra Nazionale (National Center-Right) COPASIR Comitato Parlamentare di Controllo per i Servizi di Informazione e Sicurezza e per il Segreto di Stato Italian Politics: Still Waiting for the Transformation 29 (2014): vii–ix © Berghahn Books doi:10.3167/ip.2014.290101 viii Abbreviations (Parliamentary Committee for the Intelligence and Security Services and for State Secret Control) CSD Consiglio Supremo di Difesa (Supreme Council of Defense) CSM Consiglio Superiore della Magistratura
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Policy Yearbook 2008.Pdf
    Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs Minoritenplatz 8 A-1014 Vienna Tel: During office hours on work days between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. 0 50 11 50-0 / international: +43 50 11 50-0 or: (01) 90 115-0 / int.: (+43-1) 90 115-0 For general information: 0800 234 888 (toll free number, cannot be dialled from outside Austria) Fax: 0 50 11 59-0 / international: +43 50 11 59-0 or: (01) 904 20 16-0 / international: (+43-1) 904 20 16-0 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.bmeia.gv.at Citizens’ Help Desk In case of emergency abroad the Citizens’ Help Desk can be reached 24 hours a day: Tel: 0 50 11 50-4411 / international: +43 50 11 50-4411 or: (01) 90 115-4411 / international: +43 1 90 115-4411 Fax: 0 50 11 59-4411 / international: +43 50 11 59-4411 or: 0 50 11 59-245 / international: +43 50 11 59-245 or: (01) 904 20 16-245 / international: (+43-1) 904 20 16-245 E-Mail: [email protected] Assistance services available to Austrian citizens abroad are detailed on the homepage of the Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs at www.bmeia.gv.at under “Service”.  Austrian Foreign Policy Yearbook 2008 Report by the Federal Minister for European and International Affairs  Proprietor and Publisher: Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs A-1014 Vienna, Minoritenplatz 8 Austria Edited and Coordinated by: Thomas Schlesinger Christoph Weidinger Clemens Geelhaar Monika Lemmerer English translation coordinated by: Sabine Hübler Printed by: Manz Crossmedia GmbH & Co KG A-1051 Vienna, Stolberggasse 26 Austria The original German version is available at: www.bmeia.gv.at, or in printed form in the Information Management, Documentation, Knowledge Management Department at the Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs Preface In 2008, the international community faced a number of very special challenges, ranging from the global economic crisis and the problems of the European energy supply at the beginning of the year to the conflicts in Georgia and Gaza.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (648Kb)
    This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by European Yearbook of Minority Issues, available online: https://doi.org/10.1163/22116117_01701010 The 2018 South Tyrolean Election and the Consociational System of Democracy: Stability amidst Change? Matthias Scantamburlo (Aston University) Abstract: This article explores the impact of the 2018 South Tyrolean election on the autonomous province’s consociational system of democracy. Implemented to tame centrifugal tendencies between the territory’s language groups (German, Italian and Ladin), this system has since the 1990s been losing its inclusive capacity. While the Italian-speaking electorate has increasingly been underrepresented in the main decision-making processes, the German-speaking intra-ethnic electoral arena experienced the rise of secessionist parties. The article shows that, despite major changes affecting party politics in South Tyrol, the outcome of the 2018 election contributed to restore stability to the consociational system. Keywords: territorial politics – ethnic politics – consociationalism – regional elections – South Tyrol Matthias Scantamburlo is postdoctoral researcher at Aston University (Birmingham) and team member of the Regional Manifestos Project at the University of Deusto (Basque Country). I. INTRODUCTION The election to the provincial council, the Landtag, of the Autonomous Province of Bolzano/South Tyrol (hereafter South Tyrol), held on 21 October 2018, resulted in a major shift of power and important changes in the province’s consociational political system. The South Tyrolean Peoples’ Party (SVP), the main representative of the German- and Ladin-speaking minorities and regional key power player since 1945, for the first time in its history forms a government with an Italian-speaking right-wing party, the populist (Northern) League (LN).
    [Show full text]
  • European Left Info Flyer
    United for a left alternative in Europe United for a left alternative in Europe ”We refer to the values and traditions of socialism, com- munism and the labor move- ment, of feminism, the fem- inist movement and gender equality, of the environmental movement and sustainable development, of peace and international solidarity, of hu- man rights, humanism and an- tifascism, of progressive and liberal thinking, both national- ly and internationally”. Manifesto of the Party of the European Left, 2004 ABOUT THE PARTY OF THE EUROPEAN LEFT (EL) EXECUTIVE BOARD The Executive Board was elected at the 4th Congress of the Party of the European Left, which took place from 13 to 15 December 2013 in Madrid. The Executive Board consists of the President and the Vice-Presidents, the Treasurer and other Members elected by the Congress, on the basis of two persons of each member party, respecting the principle of gender balance. COUNCIL OF CHAIRPERSONS The Council of Chairpersons meets at least once a year. The members are the Presidents of all the member par- ties, the President of the EL and the Vice-Presidents. The Council of Chairpersons has, with regard to the Execu- tive Board, rights of initiative and objection on important political issues. The Council of Chairpersons adopts res- olutions and recommendations which are transmitted to the Executive Board, and it also decides on applications for EL membership. NETWORKS n Balkan Network n Trade Unionists n Culture Network Network WORKING GROUPS n Central and Eastern Europe n Africa n Youth n Agriculture n Migration n Latin America n Middle East n North America n Peace n Communication n Queer n Education n Public Services n Environment n Women Trafficking Member and Observer Parties The Party of the European Left (EL) is a political party at the Eu- ropean level that was formed in 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2
    1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2. Malik Ben Achour, PS, Belgium 3. Tina Acketoft, Liberal Party, Sweden 4. Senator Fatima Ahallouch, PS, Belgium 5. Lord Nazir Ahmed, Non-affiliated, United Kingdom 6. Senator Alberto Airola, M5S, Italy 7. Hussein al-Taee, Social Democratic Party, Finland 8. Éric Alauzet, La République en Marche, France 9. Patricia Blanquer Alcaraz, Socialist Party, Spain 10. Lord John Alderdice, Liberal Democrats, United Kingdom 11. Felipe Jesús Sicilia Alférez, Socialist Party, Spain 12. Senator Alessandro Alfieri, PD, Italy 13. François Alfonsi, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (France) 14. Amira Mohamed Ali, Chairperson of the Parliamentary Group, Die Linke, Germany 15. Rushanara Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 16. Tahir Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 17. Mahir Alkaya, Spokesperson for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation, Socialist Party, the Netherlands 18. Senator Josefina Bueno Alonso, Socialist Party, Spain 19. Lord David Alton of Liverpool, Crossbench, United Kingdom 20. Patxi López Álvarez, Socialist Party, Spain 21. Nacho Sánchez Amor, S&D, European Parliament (Spain) 22. Luise Amtsberg, Green Party, Germany 23. Senator Bert Anciaux, sp.a, Belgium 24. Rt Hon Michael Ancram, the Marquess of Lothian, Former Chairman of the Conservative Party, Conservative Party, United Kingdom 25. Karin Andersen, Socialist Left Party, Norway 26. Kirsten Normann Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 27. Theresa Berg Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 28. Rasmus Andresen, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (Germany) 29. Lord David Anderson of Ipswich QC, Crossbench, United Kingdom 30. Barry Andrews, Renew Europe, European Parliament (Ireland) 31. Chris Andrews, Sinn Féin, Ireland 32. Eric Andrieu, S&D, European Parliament (France) 33.
    [Show full text]
  • 2Nd Report by the Republic of Austria
    Strasbourg, 1 December 2006 ACFC/SR/II(2006)008 [English only] SECOND REPORT SUBMITTED BY AUSTRIA PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Received on 1 December 2006 ACFC/SR/II(2006)008 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I...................................................................................................................................5 I.1. General Remarks..............................................................................................................5 I.2. Comments on the Questions and the Resolution of the Council of Europe ........................7 PART II ...............................................................................................................................17 II.1. The Situation of the National Minorities in Austria .......................................................17 II.1.1. The History of the National Minorities .......................................................................18 The Croat minority in Burgenland ........................................................................................18 The Slovene minority ...........................................................................................................19 The Hungarian minority .......................................................................................................21 The Czech minority..............................................................................................................21 The Slovak minority.............................................................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe by Kimberly Ann Twist a Dissertation Submitted In
    The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe by Kimberly Ann Twist A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Jonah D. Levy, Chair Professor Jason Wittenberg Professor Jacob Citrin Professor Katerina Linos Spring 2015 The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe Copyright 2015 by Kimberly Ann Twist Abstract The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe by Kimberly Ann Twist Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Jonah D. Levy, Chair As long as far-right parties { known chiefly for their vehement opposition to immigration { have competed in contemporary Western Europe, scholars and observers have been concerned about these parties' implications for liberal democracy. Many originally believed that far- right parties would fade away due to a lack of voter support and their isolation by mainstream parties. Since 1994, however, far-right parties have been included in 17 governing coalitions across Western Europe. What explains the switch from exclusion to inclusion in Europe, and what drives mainstream-right parties' decisions to include or exclude the far right from coalitions today? My argument is centered on the cost of far-right exclusion, in terms of both office and policy goals for the mainstream right. I argue, first, that the major mainstream parties of Western Europe initially maintained the exclusion of the far right because it was relatively costless: They could govern and achieve policy goals without the far right.
    [Show full text]
  • Mag. Rudi Vouk
    Mag. Rudi Vouk let 7. člena Jahre Artikel 7 60 Years of Article 7 Avtor I Autor I Author: Mag. Rudi Vouk Prevod I Übersetzung I Translation: Prof. Mag. Jože Wakounig Frank de Boer Izdajatelj I Herausgeber I Publisher: Narodni svet koroških Slovencev I Rat der kärntner Slowenen I Council of Carinthian Slovenes Viktringer Ring 26 I a-9020 Celovec/klagenfurt Tisk I Druck I Printed by: Mohorjeva I Hermagoras I adi-dassler-gasse 4 I a-9073 Vetrinj/Viktring © 2015, Narodni svet koroških Slovencev I Rat der kärntner Slowenen I Council of Carinthian Slovenes AVSTRIJSKA DRŽAVNA POGODBA – ČLEN 7 1. Avstrijski državljani slovenske in hrvatske manjšine na Koroškem, Gradiščanskem in Štajerskem uživajo iste pravice pod enakimi pogoji kakor vsi drugi avstrijski državljani, vštevši pravico do svojih lastnih organizacij, zborovanj in tiska v svojem lastnem jeziku. 2. Avstrijski državljani slovenske in hrvatske manjšine na Koroškem, Gradiščanskem in Štajerskem imajo pravico do osnovnega pouka v slovenskem ali hrvatskem jeziku in do sorazmernega števila lastnih srednjih šol; v tej zadevi bodo šolski učni načrti pregledani in bo ustanovljen oddelek šolske nadzorne oblasti za slovenske in hrvatske šole. 3. V upravnih in sodnih okrajih Koroške, Gradiščanske in Štajerske s slovenskim, hrvatskim ali mešanim prebi - valstvom je slovenski ali hrvatski jezik dopuščen kot uradni jezik dodatno k nemškemu. V takih okrajih bodo označbe in napisi topografskega značaja prav tako v slovenščini ali hrvaščini kakor v nemščini. 4. Avstrijski državljani slovenske in hrvatske manjšine na Koroškem, Gradiščanskem in Štajerskem so udeleženi v kulturnih, upravnih in sodnih ustanovah v teh pokrajinah pod enakimi pogoji kakor drugi avstrijski državljani.
    [Show full text]
  • A State of the Art Report on the Italo-Slovene Border
    EUROREG Changing interests and identities in European border regions: A state of the art report on the Italo-Slovene border Jeremy Faro Kingston University United Kingdom INTERREG IIIA ITALY/SLOVENIA PROGRAMMING REGION 6th Framework Programme Priority 7: Citizens and Governance in Knowledge Based Society Contract no. FP6-506019 Table of Contents 1.0 The Italo-Slovene borderland: an introduction to the frontier, its population, and EU-led cross-border cooperation 1 2.0 An overview of Italo-Slovene borderland and minority relations, 1918-2004 2 2.1.1 The ethnicity and geography of the Italo-Slovene borderland, 1918-1945 2 2.1.2 The ethnicity and geography of the Italo-Slovene borderland, 1945-2004 6 2.1.3 Ethno-linguistic minority issues in the Italo-Slovene frontier, 1994-2005 12 2.2 Socio-economic development and EU regional policy in the Italo-Slovene borderland 14 2.3 The institutional geography of Italo-Slovene cross-border cooperation 17 2.4 Overall assessment 19 3.0 Literature review 20 3.1 An overview of the political economy and anthropology of borderlands 20 3.2 Ethnic-national identities and the politics of culture and identity: Typologies of borderland identity and development 23 3.3 Minority-majority relations in the borderland: Toward a theoretical context for cross-border cooperation 26 4.0 Conclusion 29 Bibliography 31 Annex I: Policy report 41 Annex II: Research competence mapping 50 1.0 The Italo-Slovene borderland: an introduction to the frontier, its population, and EU- led cross-border cooperation The ‘natural’ boundary between Italy and Slovenia—the summit line of the Julian Alps— arrives suddenly, just north of metropolitan Trieste, amidst the morphologically non-linear Karst: those classical, jagged limestone hills, caves, and pits created over millennia by underground rivers which have given their name to similar geological formations around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • 'S Elsass, Unser Land!*
    Élections départementales Canton de Saverne Collectivité européenne d’Alsace – 2021 ’s Elsass, * Lena unser Land! DECKER Pour notre pays, notre terre et nos libertés ! 26 ans, agent administratif à Saverne. *L’Alsace, notre terre ! Engagée dans plusieurs associations, la défense de notre patrimoine culturel, linguistique et naturel lui tient à cœur. Dialectophone, elle souhaite que notre langue ne Stop Grand Est, en avant l’Alsace ! devienne pas un objet de musée, mais au contraire que les générations suivantes continueront de parler alsacien. En 2015, François Hollande a décidé de supprimer la région Alsace. Alors qu’une grande partie de la classe politique locale a finalement accepté cette réforme à la fois incohérente et Remplaçante : anti-démocratique, des dizaines de milliers de citoyens se sont mobilisés aux côtés d’Unser MARIE-FRANÇOISE SCHNEIDER Land afin que l’Alsace ne disparaisse pas. En janvier dernier, les départements du Haut-Rhin 74 ans. et du Bas-Rhin ont été réunis dans une nouvelle entité dénommée « Collectivité européenne Alsacienne d’adoption, elle a vécu dans différentes villes d’Alsace » (CEA). C’est une première victoire, mais ne soyons pas dupes : la CEA n’est rien en France, en Suisse et en Afrique, d’autre qu’un simple département aux compétences limitées. D’autre part, l’Alsace est tou- avant de s’établir à Saverne. Elle a travaillé sur les sujets de jours noyée dans le Grand Est. Tout reste à faire ! migration et d’intégration. Alors que les Français sont favorables au maintien des cultures minoritaires Prenons notre destin en main dans d’autres parties du monde, nos gouvernants font Justice sociale, politique de santé, maintien de l’emploi, sécurité, démocratie participative, tout pour en finir avec les cultures minoritaires de préservation de l’environnement, maîtrise de la mondialisation : il faut agir… mais encore France, notamment en Alsace : c’est ce qui a motivé Marie-Françoise à s’engager pour Unser Land.
    [Show full text]