DOCSLIB.ORG

Philosophy of Religion (107) Andrew Stephenson Trinity College Philosophy of Religion (107)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Philosophy of Religion (107) Andrew Stephenson Trinity College Philosophy of Religion (107) Philosophy of Religion (107) Andrew Stephenson Trinity College Philosophy of Religion (107) Andrew Stephenson, Trinity College Tutorials • All tutorials will take place in my office in Trinity (last door on the right in the Academic Corridor, opposite the President's Secretary). Times will be arranged by email. • Email me you essays to me and your tutorial partner by 1pm the day before we meet. Please put your name at the top of your essay. • You should always read your partner’s essay before the tutorial and please make time to meet up with your partner before the tutorial to discuss the topic and make a list of points you’d like to discuss. • Always spell-check your essays and read it aloud before emailing it – a good way to catch unclear or mistaken passages. • Always bring hardcopies of the essays, not just your laptops. • Please be on time. If you’re late, we’ll still finish at the normal time. • Please notify me and your tutorial partner by email as soon as possible if you will not be able to complete an essay or attend a tutorial, explaining why, and also when you will be able to complete the essay. Occasionally, it will be possible to reschedule a tutorial so long as there is a good reason and good advance warning is given, but this isn’t guaranteed. • When you have an appointment with me, please knock on my office door and wait. • Turn off your mobile phones before coming to the tutorial! Also: • Tutorials are an opportunity to clarify your understanding of the issues. The tutorial should be driven by your questions and your attempts to come to grips with the fundamental issues that the questions we are discussing raise. So this means that you must talk. You should come to tutorials prepared with questions and comments on that week’s readings and/or on your partner’s essays. • The tutorial is not assessed formally, and is a non-judgemental environment, so you should not feel afraid to ask what you may regard as ‘silly’ questions. There is a simple rule to follow when formulating questions: if it will help your understanding to have a question answered, then ask it. 1 Philosophy of Religion (107) Andrew Stephenson Trinity College Useful Recent Anthologies/Introductions • Stump, E. & Murray, M. Philosophy of Religion: the Big Questions (Blackwell, 1998) • Wainwright, W., ed., The Oxford Handbook to Philosophy of Religion (OUP 2005) • Mackie, J.L. The Miracle of Theism (Clarendon, 1982) • Swinburne, R. The Existence of God 2nd edition (OUP, 1991); see also the easier version of this: Is There a God? (OUP, 1996) Readings The readings for each week are divided into ‘essential’ and ‘further’ readings. You should read all the essential readings before writing your essay. You probably won’t have time to read many of the further readings during term, but you may wish to explore them later for the topics you are particularly interested in and also for revision / during exam preparation. For further readings, both general collections and on specific topics, see also Professor Leftow’s Faculty Reading List (available from the faculty website). Finally, you are encouraged to do your own research and you should feel free to make use of literature you have discovered yourself. 1. The Ontological Argument Essay Question: What is the most convincing form of the ontological argument? Is it convincing, or does it still have problems? If it has problems, what are they? Essential Reading The following classic texts are available in many collections, for example Alvin Plantinga (ed.), The Ontological Argument (Macmillan, 1968), John Hick and Arthur McGill (eds.), The Many-Faced Argument (Macmillan, 1968), or John Hick (ed.) The Existence of God (Macmillan, 1964): • Anselm, Saint, Proslogion chapters 2-4 • Gaunilo, In Behalf of the Fool • Anselm, Saint, Reply to Gaunilo • Descartes, René, Meditations V • Kant, Immanuel, “The Impossibility of an Ontological Proof of the Existence of God”, in The Critique of Pure Reason, Transcendental Dialectic, Book II, Chapter III, Section 4. • Plantinga’s version of the argument is in his The Nature of Necessity (OUP, 1974), chapter 10, or God, Freedom and Evil (George Allen & Unwin, 1975), pp 85-112. Also: • Oppy, Graham, "Ontological Arguments", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/ontological-arguments/>. 2 Philosophy of Religion (107) Andrew Stephenson Trinity College • Leftow, B. “The Ontological Argument”, in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion, edited by William Wainwright (OUP: 2004). • Mackie, J. L. 1982. The Miracle of Theism: Arguments for and Against the Existence of God. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Ch.3. Further Reading • Hick, J.H. Arguments for the Existence of God (Macmillan, 1970) chs 5-6 • Malcolm, N. 1960. ‘Anselm’s Ontological Arguments’. Philosophical Review 69: 41- 62. Reprinted in Alvin Plantinga, ed., The Ontological Argument: From St. Anselm to Contemporary Philosophers. New York: Anchor Books, 1965. • Barnes, Jonathan. 1972. The Ontological Argument. London: Macmillan. • van Inwagen, P. 1993. Metaphysics. Boulder: Westview Press. Ch. 5. • Davis, S. T. 1997. God, Reason and Theistic Proofs. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Chs. 2 and 4. • Millican, P. “The One Fatal Flaw in Anselm’s Argument”, Mind 113 (2004), pp. 437- 76. • Oppy, G. The Ontological Argument (Cambridge 1995). • Stephenson, A. ‘David Lewis’s Neglected Challenge: It’s Me or God’, Perspectives 3 (2010): http://www.ucd.ie/philosophy/perspectives/resources/issue3/Perspectives_volumeIII_ DLewisNeglectedChallenge.pdf 2. The Cosmological Argument Essay Question: Is the cosmological argument convincing? Can we explain the existence of the universe without God, and even if not, does that provide good reason to believe that God exists? Essential Reading • Aquinas, Summa Theologica, First Part, Question 2, “The Existence of God”. • Leibniz, G. “On the Ultimate Origination of Things”, in Leibniz: Philosophical Essays, translated by Ariew, and Garber (Hacker, 1989). • Mackie, J. L. The Miracle of Theism (Clarendon, 1982) chapter 5. • Rowe, William. “The Cosmological Argument” Noûs, vol. 5, no. 1 (1971) pp. 49-61. Further Reading • Reichenbach, Bruce, "Cosmological Argument", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2010 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2010/entries/cosmological-argument/>. • Hume, David, Treatise of Human Nature I iii 3 “Why a Cause is Always Necessary”; Enquiry concerning Human Understanding Section IV Part i; Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion Part ix. • Anthony Kenny, The Five Ways (Notre Dame). • William Rowe, The Cosmological Argument (Princeton, 1975). • van Inwagen, P. 1993. Metaphysics. Boulder: Westview Press. Ch.6. • Taylor, R. 1983. Metaphysics. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. pp.99-108. • Davis, S. T. 1997. God, Reason and Theistic Proofs. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Ch. 4. 3 Philosophy of Religion (107) Andrew Stephenson Trinity College • Swinburne, R. 1991. The Existence of God. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Ch. 7. • Leslie, John. 1989. Universes. London: Routledge. • D. Burrill, ed., The Cosmological Argument • Craig, W. L. The Kalām Cosmological Argument. London: MacMillan. 1979. • Craig, W. L. The Cosmological Argument from Plato to Leibniz. London: MacMillan. 1980. • Le Poidevin, R. Arguing for Atheism (Routledge,1996), chapters 1-3 3. The Design Argument Essay Question: Is any form of the design argument still viable? Essential Reading • Hume, David. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. • Swinburne, R. Is There a God? (OUP, 1996) chapters 1-4. • Mackie, J. L. The Miracle of Theism (Clarendon, 1982) chapter 8. • Leslie, J. Anthropic Principle, World Ensemble, Design in American Philosophical Quarterly vol 19 (1982), pp 141-152. Further Reading • Swinburne, R. The Existence of God (OUP, second edition 1991), chapters 1-6 and 8, Appendix B on the Fine Tuning Argument • Ratzsch, Del, "Teleological Arguments for God's Existence", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/teleological-arguments/>. • Manson, N., ed., God and Design (Routledge 2003). • Dawkins, R. 1986. The Blind Watchmaker. Harlow: Longman. • Hurlbutt, Robert. 1965. Hume, Newton and the Design Argument. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. • Gerson, L. P. 1990. God and Greek Philosophy: Studies in the Early History of Natural Theology. London: Routledge. Ch.2, secs. on Stoic Design Arguments. • Davis, S. T. 1997. God, Reason and Theistic Proofs. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Ch.6. • Gaskin, J. Hume’s Philosophy of Religion (Macmillan, second edition, 1988), pp. 116-31. • Gaskin, J. “Religion: The Useless Hypothesis”, in Millican (ed.) Reading Hume on Human Understanding (OUP, 2002), chapter 13. • Le Poidevin, R. Arguing for Atheism (Routledge,1996), chapters 4 and 5 4. The Logical Problem of Evil Essay Question: What is the logical problem of evil? Can it be resolved? Essential Reading • Adams, R. M. and Adams, M. M., ‘Introduction’ to their classic collection The Problem of Evil (OUP, 1990) – this will provide you with a very good overview of the issues that we will discuss this week and next. • Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, Parts X and XI • Plantinga, A. God, Freedom and Evil (George Allen & Unwin, 1975) pp. 7-59. 4 Philosophy of Religion (107) Andrew Stephenson Trinity College • Mackie, J. L. ‘Evil and Omnipotence’, reprinted as chapter 1 of Adams and Adams (above) or originally in Mind, 64 (1955), pp.200-12. Further Reading • Swinburne, R. Providence and the Problem of Evil (Clarendon, 1998) • Augustine, On the Freedom of Choice, Bks.2 and 3. • Aquinas, On Evil and Commentary on the Book of Job. • Leibniz, Theodicy. • Chapters 2-6 of Adams, M. M., and R. M. Adams, eds. 1990. The Problem of Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press. • Fischer, John Martin. “Recent Work on God and Freedom”, American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 29, No. 2 (1992), pp. 91-109. • Tracy, T.M. “Victimization and the Problem of Evil‟ in Faith and Philosophy vol 9 (1992), pp 301-324.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Christian Contradictions: the Structures of Lutheran and Catholic Thought - Daphne Hampson Frontmatter More Information
    Cambridge University Press 0521450608 - Christian Contradictions: The Structures of Lutheran and Catholic Thought - Daphne Hampson Frontmatter More information CHRISTIAN CONTRADICTIONS THE STRUCTURES OF LUTHERAN AND CATHOLIC THOUGHT Catholic thought and Lutheran thought are differently struc- tured, embodying divergent conceptions of the self in relation to God. Failing to grasp the Lutheran paradigm, Catholics have wrenched Luther into an inappropriate framework. Roman/ Lutheran ecumenism, culminating in the `Joint declaration' of 1999, attempts to reconcile incompatible systems, based on different philosophical presuppositions. Drawing on a wealth of material, both Continental and Anglo-Saxon, the author thinks through these structural questions within a historical context. But how ± within a religion of revelation ± can God be conceptualised as both foundational to the self and yet also an `other' with whom the self inter-relates? Kierkegaard is shown in a complex model to hold together strengths which histori- cally have been exempli®ed by the two traditions. This is an important work in systematic theology which considers questions quite fundamental to Western religion. It should be of interest to theologians of all backgrounds and also to church historians. daphne hampson is Reader in Divinity at the University of St Andrews. She holds doctorates in Modern History (from Oxford), in Systematic Theology (from Harvard) and a master's degree in Continental Philosophy (from Warwick). She is the author of Theology and Feminism (1990),
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Church for Strangers John Swinton, Phd, BD, RMN, RNMH
    Building a Church for Strangers John Swinton, PhD, BD, RMN, RNMH ABSTRACT. The paper focuses on the relationship between the author and a young man who has Down’s syndrome. As the author reflects on his experiences with Stephen, he finds his understanding of theology, church and disabilities transformed. Life with Stephen reveals the op- pressive nature of Western societies and the subtle ways in which the church is implicated in such oppression. Yet at the same time the depen- dence and simplicity of Stephen’s life reminds us of forgotten dimen- sions of being human. Beginning with the premise that developmental disabilities in all of their different forms are not problems to be solved, but rather authentic ways of being human that need to be understood and respected, the paper challenges the church to be the church in a way that is meaningful and inclusive. If all human beings are truly made in God’s image, then the Body of Christ must become a place where discrimination and prejudice are abandoned and uncompromising love is embraced. Only then can the apostle Paul’s vision of a community within which there is ‘neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female . black nor white, able bodied and handicapped,’ become a reality.[ArticlecopiesavailableforafeefromTheHaworthDocumentDelivery Service1: -800-342-9678E. -maialddress<: [email protected]>Web- site:<http://www.HaworthPress.com>E2001byTheHaworthPress,Inc.All rights reserved.] KEYWORDS. Down’s syndrome, friendship, social construction of disability, the Body of Christ, Eucharist, inclusive community, enlight- enment rationalism, communication Rev.Dr.JohnSwintonworkedasanurseforsixteenyears,specializing withinthe areasofpsychiatryandlearningdisability(mentalretardationUSA).Healso spenta number of years working within the field of hospital chaplaincy, laterally as a community psychiatricchaplain.
    [Show full text]
  • James Baldwin and James Cone: God, Man, and the Redeeming Relationship
    Obsculta Volume 8 Issue 1 Article 3 5-22-2015 James Baldwin and James Cone: God, Man, and the Redeeming Relationship Rea McDonnell S.S.N.D. College of Saint Benedict/Saint John's University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/obsculta Part of the Christianity Commons, Race and Ethnicity Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons ISSN: 2472-2596 (print) ISSN: 2472-260X (online) Recommended Citation McDonnell, Rea S.S.N.D.. 2015. James Baldwin and James Cone: God, Man, and the Redeeming Relationship. Obsculta 8, (1) : 13-54. https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/obsculta/vol8/iss1/3. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@CSB/SJU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Obsculta by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@CSB/SJU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OBSCVLTA J AMES B ALDWIN AND J AMES C ONE : G OD , M AN , AND THE R EDEEMIN G R ELATIONSHI P Sister Rea McDonnell, S.S.N.D. (1972) Abstract - Pope Francis calls us to live among the wounded and marginalized, letting them heal us and free us. How very cur- rent that makes this article, written as a Master’s thesis in 1972. Apart from anachronisms such as writing about God as “man” (instead of men/women), about redeeming (when I meant sav- ing), what is so apropos is the good news proclaimed by both James Cone and James Baldwin. James Cone wrote ground- breaking books on liberation theology. James Baldwin, as an author, expresses Black theology through his characters.
    [Show full text]
  • MICHAEL ROOT School of Theology and Religious Studies the Catholic University of America
    MICHAEL ROOT School of Theology and Religious Studies The Catholic University of America EMPLOYMENT 2011-Present: Ordinary Professor of Systematic Theology, The Catholic University of America 2003-2011: Professor of Systematic Theology (also Dean and Vice President for Academic Affairs, 2003-9) Lutheran Theological Southern Seminary, Columbia, SC 1998-2003: Edward C. Fendt Professor of Systematic Theology Trinity Lutheran Seminary, Columbus, Ohio 1988-1998: Research Professor; Director (1991-93; 1995-97) Institute for Ecumenical Research, Strasbourg, France 1980-1988: Assistant (1980-84) and Associate (1984-88) Professor of Systematic Theology Lutheran Theological Southern Seminary 1978-80: Instructor in Religion Davidson College, Davidson, North Carolina OTHER ACTIVITIES 2006-2015: Executive Director, Center for Catholic and Evangelical Theology 2006-Present: Associate Editor, Pro Ecclesia EDUCATION 1979: Ph.D., in Religious Studies - Theology; Yale University 1977: M.Phil., Yale University 1974: M.A., Yale University 1973: A.B., Dartmouth College (Summa Cum Laude, Salutatorian) MEMBERSHIPS Editorial board, Brazos Theological Commentary on the Bible, 2003- present Editorial Advisory Board, Ecclesiology, 2006-2015 Board of Directors, Center for Catholic and Evangelical Theology, 2016- present Member, USA Lutheran-Catholic Dialogue, 1998-2010, 2013-present Member, International Lutheran-Catholic Dialogue, 2008-2010 Drafting committee for Lutheran-Episcopal full communion agreement Called to Common Mission, 1997-99 Drafting committee to
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Anthropology in Education
    THE EVOLUTION OF ANTHROPOLOGY IN EDUCATION: A REVIEW OF THE HISTORICAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ANTHROPOLOGY AND EDUCATION AND THE IMPLICATION FOR ANTHROPOLOGICAL CONTRIBUTION TO GENERAL EDUCATION by Charles Arthur McGill A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Social Science in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Teaching Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, Florida THE EVOLUTION OF ANTHROPOLOGY IN EDUCATION: A REVIEW OF THE HISTORICAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ANTHROPOLOGY AND EDUCATION AND THE IMPLICATION FOR ANTHROPOLOGICAL CONTRIBUTION TO GENERAL EDUCATION by Charles Arthur McGill This thesis was prepared under the direction of the candidate's thesis advisor, Dr. William H. Sears, Department of Anthropology, and has been approved by the members of his supervisory committee. It was submitted to the faculty of the College of Social Science and was accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Teaching. ~· .. ltls"" ed Studies dat~~~ ii ABSTRACT Author: Charles Arthur McGill Title: The Evolution of Anthropology in Education: A Review of the Historical Relationship Between Anthropology and Education and the Implication for Anthropological Contribution to General Education Institution: Florida Atlantic University Degree: Master of Arts in Teaching Year: 1975 It is the contention of this paper that in the future more and more students in the undergraduate survey courses will be introduced to Anthropology; concomitantly students approaching teaching in the field of Social Studies are doing so with a background of anthropology. Anthropology's growth has precipitated its incorporation in undergraduate requirements for students majoring in Social Science and Education.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethics of Vision and Black Theology and Experience
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2014 The Ethics of Vision and Black Theology and Experience Angelo Sylvester Riley Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Ethics in Religion Commons Recommended Citation Riley, Angelo Sylvester, "The Ethics of Vision and Black Theology and Experience" (2014). Dissertations. 1299. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/1299 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 2014 Angelo Sylvester Riley LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO THE ETHICS OF VISION AND BLACK THEOLOGY AND EXPERIENCE A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM IN THEOLOGY BY REVEREND ANGELO S. RILEY CHICAGO, IL DECEMBER 2014 Copyright by Angelo S. Riley, 2014 All rights reserved. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank all of the people who made this dissertation possible starting with my professors in the Department of Theology at Loyola University Chicago. I would also like to thank my dissertation committee - Dr. William French, Dr. Jon Nilson, and Dr. Susan Ross. Next, I would like to thank my family for their support and understanding when I was not able to attend family gatherings during the writing of my dissertation. In particular, I would like to thank my wonderful daughter Lauren for her patience and for providing me with a much needed cheering section and with necessary distractions allowing me to regroup and come back to the dissertation process refreshed.
    [Show full text]
  • Maurice Blondel's Examination of the Proof in Anselm, Descartes
    The Ontological Proof, the Option, and the Unique Necessaire: Maurice Blondel’s Examination of the Proof in Anselm, Descartes, and Malebranche Gregory B. Sadler Ball State University Maurice Blondel makes reference to and use of the ontological argument both in his early L’action (1893) and his later metaphysical Trilogy. This paper examines Blondel’s interpretation of the argument as a central part of his philosophy and Blondel’s discussions of the argument in his interpretation of Anselm, Descartes, and Malebranche. The first part of the paper discusses Blondel’s reinterpretation of the argument in L’action (1893) and the second part discusses his further reinterpretation in La Pensée. The third part discusses Blondel’s interpretation of the ontological argument in Anselm, Descartes, and Malebranche in relation to broader themes motivating their work, which he discusses in articles in the Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale and the Rivista di filosofia neoscolastica. I argue that Blondel gives Descartes a priority over Anselm, and Malebranche over Descartes. In the fourth part, I argue that the priority Blondel assigns to Descartes over Anselm ought to be minimized, and discuss two similarities between Blondel’s position and Anselm’s position. In his early works L’action (1893) and the Letter on Apologetics, Maurice Blondel argues that philosophy cannot fully avoid the implications and demands posed by the “religious problem,” a problem posed within philosophy concerning how philosophers articulate and understand philosophy’s relationship to religion, in particular to Christianity. One continual drive within many currents of increasingly secular philosophy characteristic of the early modern period, the Enlightenment, and later modernity, consists in attempting to set aside this problem, to make it into a peripheral or derivative concern that could be dealt with or even simply ignored after the real philosophizing had been finished.
    [Show full text]
  • Dying Well B Y a B I G a I L R I a N E V a N S
    35 Dying Well B Y A B IG A I L R I A N E V A NS How can we confront suffering and our fear of death? The words of the HEIDELBERG CATEchISM—“That I belong—body and soul, in life and in death—not to myself but to my faithful Savior, Jesus Christ”—ring in our ears. Dying well begins with our perspective on life and living well. uring a retreat several years ago, a group of Princeton Theological Seminary faculty members were asked to choose the analogy which Dmost closely matched their view of life: life is a race; life is a pil- grimage; life is meaningless; life is a mystery; life is a dream; or life is a gift. By far, the largest group identified with “life is a gift.” At those times in our lives when we experience joy and fulfillment, we more readily identify with life as a gift. Yet when we encounter the fragility of life in a sudden death, life does not feel like a gift. For some people in the midst of suffering and immense pain, life is a gift that they would like to relinquish back to God. They may turn to euthanasia in fear; they want to get dying out of the way or at least be rid of their pain and suffering. Oddly enough, until we understand the meaning of life we cannot face death, since how we live often determines how we die. Dying well begins with our perspective on life and living well. THE VALUE OF HUMAN LIFE Scripture calls us to place a high value on the creation, and particularly on human life, because these are God’s good gifts.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\WW Manuscripts\Back Issues\8-4 Feminism\8
    Word & World 8/4 (1988) Copyright © 1988 by Word & World, Luther Seminary, St. Paul, MN. All rights reserved. page 334 Luther on the Self: A Feminist Critique DAPHNE HAMPSON University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Scotland It is imperative that feminists working in theology should pay attention to the implications of feminist thought for the structure of theology. In this essay I shall suggest that, while there can be no incompatibility between feminism and being religious, feminism comports ill with Christianity. This is particularly the case when we consider Christianity in its Lutheran form. On the other hand, I believe that Luther’s understanding that if one is to speak of God one must say that the self cannot be itself except as God is fundamental to the constitution of that self, must be retained within theology, and indeed can appropriately be developed by feminists. (Luther would not have used the term “self” and lacked a post-Enlightenment conception of the “self,” but this is the best word to use when translating his insight into a modern idiom.) I. LUTHER AND THE SELF Luther’s achievement lay in his reconceptualization of the human relation to God. The medieval Catholic understanding of the human relation to God, grounded as it was in the thought of the ancient world, had supposed (as does modern Catholicism) that it is God’s work to transform the human. Luther denied this. For him the revolution involved in being a Christian is that one is no longer concerned about what one is in oneself, or what one could become through God’s grace.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Meeting Key
    ANNUAL MEETING KEY 1. WHITE HOUSE 7. DEPARTMENT OF STATE 2. U.S. CAPITOL 8. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 3. WASHINGTON MONUMENT 9. NATIONAL ARCHIVES 4. LINCOLN MEMORIAL 10. SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION 5. ARLINGTON NATIONAL CEMETERY 11. SUPREME COUR1 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 6. JEFFERSON MEMORIAL 12. ^W/ THETMF MALLMAI I 11J k 2 A J 10 4s30 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF RELIGION SOCIETY OF BIBLICAL LITERATURE SOCIETY FOR THE SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF RELIGION ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSORS AND RESEARCHERS IN RELIGIOUS EDUCATION THE RELIGIOUS RESEARCH ASSOCIATION 24-27 OCTOBER, 1974 THE WASHINGTON HILTON, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009 THE WASHINGTON HILTON Connecticut Avenue at Columbia Road, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20009 Telephone 202/483-3000 CONTENTS General Information 4 Society Information and Officers American Academy of Religion 6 Society of Biblical Literature 8 Society for the Scientific Study of Religion 10 Religious Research Association 1 1 Association of Professors and Researchers in Religious Education 11 Program Digest 12 Hotel Floor Plans: Lobby Level 17 Hotel Floor Plans: Convention Level 18 Program AAR and SBL 20 SSSR, RRA, and APRRE 74 Scholars' Press 93 Society Membership and Publications 99 List of Exhibitors 102 Advertisements 103 Index 125 Order Blank for AAR Program Papers 132 Reservation Form for Breakfast Discussions 132 Registration Form Final Page Application for Membership Form Final Page Hotel Reservation Form Final Page Information/Registration Inside Back Cover GENERAL INFORMATION each of the Societies. Each registrant will receive a copy of Registration the Book of Abstracts of the Society to which he or she The Registration Area for the Annual Meeting will be belongs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cultural Production of Evil Some Notes on Aunt Jemima and the Imagination
    the cultural production of evil some notes on aunt jemima and the imagination. by emilie m. townes Illustration by Josie Jammet “. what it means to be a Negro in America can perhaps be suggested by an examination of the myths we perpetuate about him. Aunt Jemima and Uncle Tom are dead, their places taken by a group of amazingly well-adjusted young men and women, almost as dark, but ferociously literate, well-dressed and scrubbed, who are never laughed at, who are not likely ever to set foot in a cotton or tobacco field or in any but the most modern of kitchens. There are others who remain, in our odd idiom, “underprivileged”; some are bitter and these come to grief; some are unhappy, but, continually presented with the evidence of a better day soon to come, are speedily becoming less so. Most of them care nothing whatever about race. They want only their proper place in the sun and the right to be left alone, like any other citizen of the republic. We may all breathe more easily. Before, however, our joy at the demise of Aunt Jemima and Uncle Tom approaches the indecent, we had better ask whence they sprang, how they lived? Into what limbo have they vanished?”⁄ 1. James Baldwin, “Many Thousands Gone,” in Notes of a Native Son (Beacon Press, 1955), 27. 30 . winter 2006 in this 1955 essay, “many thousands gone,” james baldwin explores richard wright’s novel native son baldwin is working fiercely to construct what it means to be a negro in america for baldwin, this is visceral he is tired of black folk being treated as mere social agendas rather than as flesh and blood he notes that dehumanization is never a one-way street that the loss of identity be it stolen, borrowed, denied, or annihilated has consequences far beyond those who are the immediate victims that our crimes against ourselves echo and haunt and damn and eviscerate us and it is not enough not in 1955 not in 2005 to think that we can leave our memories checked at some dismal door of gerrymandered elections or xenophobic nationalism or sycophantic equalities harvard divinity bulletin .
    [Show full text]
  • Theology Today
    theology today volume 67, N u m b e r 3 october 2010 EDITORIAL Bringing the Body to the Table 255 GORDON S. MIKOSKI ARTICLES The Theology of Providence 261 DAVID FERGUSSON The Kirchenkampf of the Countercultural Colony: A Critical Response 279 STEFFEN LöSEL Augustine’s Interpretation of John’s Prologue: A Theology of God’s Word 299 MAICO MICHIELEN History as Sacrament: The Joys of Noninstrumentalized Time 308 CRAIG HOVEY The Redeeming Patience of Jesus 320 DAVID LAUBER The English Bible in the Spiritual Life of the English- Speaking People 335 FREDERICK W. LOETSCHER BOOK REVIEWS Genesis, by R. R. Reno 345 WALTER BRUEGGEMANN Deuteronomy, by Telford Work 348 KENT AARON REYNOLDS Proverbs 10–31: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary, by Michael V. Fox 350 GREG SCHMIDT GOERING TT 67-3-Pages.indb 1 8/6/10 3:17 PM Homilies on the Gospel of John 1–40 (The Works of St. Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century, part 3, vol. 12) Translated by Edmund Hill, op, edited by Allan D. Fitzgerald, osa 353 DANIEL J. JONES A Critical Study on T. F. Torrance’s Theology of Incarnation by Man Kei Ho 356 CHRISTIAN D. KETTLER Transforming Atonement: A Political Theology of the Cross by Theodore W. Jennings Jr. 357 SALLY A. BROWN The Eucharist and Ecumenism: Let Us Keep the Feast by George Hunsinger 360 MARTHA MOORE-KEISH Dietrich Bonhoeffer: Berlin 1932–1933 (Dietrich Bonhoeffer Works, vol. 12), edited by Larry L. Rasmussen 363 STEPHEN J. PLANT God and the Philosophers, by Keith Ward 365 GORDON GRAHAM The Gift of Responsibility: The Promise of Dialogue among Christians, Jews, and Muslims, by Lewis Mudge 367 JUSTUS N.
    [Show full text]