Writing an INTERPRETER in Go Writing an Interpreter in Go

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Writing an INTERPRETER in Go Writing an Interpreter in Go Thorsten Ball writing an INTERPRETER in go Writing An Interpreter In Go Thorsten Ball Contents Acknowledgments 3 Introduction 4 The Monkey Programming Language & Interpreter .................... 5 Why Go? ........................................... 7 How to Use this Book .................................... 8 1 Lexing 9 1.1 - Lexical Analysis ..................................... 9 1.2 - Defining Our Tokens .................................. 10 1.3 - The Lexer ........................................ 12 1.4 - Extending our Token Set and Lexer ......................... 20 1.5 - Start of a REPL .................................... 25 2 Parsing 28 2.1 - Parsers .......................................... 28 2.2 - Why not a parser generator? ............................. 30 2.3 - Writing a Parser for the Monkey Programming Language ............. 31 2.4 - Parser’s first steps: parsing let statements ...................... 32 2.5 - Parsing Return Statements .............................. 44 2.6 - Parsing Expressions .................................. 46 Expressions in Monkey ................................. 47 Top Down Operator Precedence (or: Pratt Parsing) ................ 48 Terminology ....................................... 48 Preparing the AST ................................... 49 Implementing the Pratt Parser ............................ 52 Identifiers ........................................ 53 Integer Literals ..................................... 56 Prefix Operators .................................... 59 Infix Operators ..................................... 63 2.7 - How Pratt Parsing Works ............................... 69 2.8 - Extending the Parser .................................. 77 Boolean Literals .................................... 79 Grouped Expressions .................................. 82 If Expressions ...................................... 84 Function Literals .................................... 89 Call Expressions .................................... 93 Removing TODOs ................................... 97 2.9 - Read-Parse-Print-Loop ................................. 100 3 Evaluation 103 1 3.1 - Giving Meaning to Symbols .............................. 103 3.2 - Strategies of Evaluation ................................ 104 3.3 - A Tree-Walking Interpreter .............................. 105 3.4 - Representing Objects .................................. 106 Foundation of our Object System ........................... 108 Integers ......................................... 108 Booleans ......................................... 109 Null ........................................... 109 3.5 - Evaluating Expressions ................................. 110 Integer Literals ..................................... 111 Completing the REPL ................................. 113 Boolean Literals .................................... 114 Null ........................................... 116 Prefix Expressions ................................... 116 Infix Expressions .................................... 120 3.6 - Conditionals ....................................... 125 3.7 - Return Statements ................................... 127 3.8 - Abort! Abort! There’s been a mistake!, or: Error Handling ............ 131 3.9 - Bindings & The Environment ............................. 136 3.10 - Functions & Function Calls .............................. 140 3.11 - Who’s taking the trash out? ............................. 150 4 Extending the Interpreter 152 4.1 - Data Types & Functions ................................ 152 4.2 - Strings .......................................... 152 Supporting Strings in our Lexer ............................ 153 Parsing Strings ..................................... 155 Evaluating Strings ................................... 156 String Concatenation .................................. 158 4.3 - Built-in Functions ................................... 160 len ............................................ 160 4.4 - Array .......................................... 164 Supporting Arrays in our Lexer ............................ 165 Parsing Array Literals ................................. 166 Parsing Index Operator Expressions ......................... 169 Evaluating Array Literals ............................... 172 Evaluating Index Operator Expressions ....................... 174 Adding Built-in Functions for Arrays ......................... 177 Test-Driving Arrays .................................. 180 4.5 - Hashes .......................................... 181 Lexing Hash Literals .................................. 182 Parsing Hash Literals ................................. 184 Hashing Objects .................................... 188 Evaluating Hash Literals ................................ 192 Evaluating Index Expressions With Hashes ..................... 195 4.6 - The Grand Finale .................................... 198 Resources 200 Feedback 202 Changelog 203 2 Acknowledgments I want to use these lines to express my gratitude to my wife for supporting me. She’s the reason you’re reading this. This book wouldn’t exist without her encouragement, faith in me, assistance and her willingness to listen to my mechanical keyboard clacking away at 6am. Thanks to my friends Christian, Felix and Robin for reviewing early versions of this book and providing me with invaluable feedback, advice and cheers. You improved this book more than you can imagine. 3 Introduction The first sentence of this introduction was supposed to be this one: “Interpreters are magical”. But one of the earliest reviewers, who wishes to remain anonymous, said that “sounds super stupid”. Well, Christian, I don’t think so! I still think that interpreters are magical! Let me tell you why. On the surface they look deceptively simple: text goes in and something comes out. They are programs that take other programs as their input and produce something. Simple, right? But the more you think about it, the more fascinating it becomes. Seemingly random characters - letters, numbers and special characters - are fed into the interpreter and suddenly become meaningful. The interpreter gives them meaning! It makes sense out of nonsense. And the computer, a machine that’s built on understanding ones and zeroes, now understands and acts upon this weird language we feed into it - thanks to an interpreter that translates this language while reading it. I kept asking myself: how does this work? And the first time this question began forming in my mind, I already knew that I’ll only be satisfied with an answer if I get to it by writing my own interpreter. So I set out to do so. A lot of books, articles, blog posts and tutorials on interpreters exist. Most of the time, though, they fall into one of two categories. Either they are huge, incredibly heavy on theory and more targeted towards people who already have a vast understanding of the topic, or they are really short, provide just a small introduction to the topic, use external tools as black boxes and only concern themselves with “toy interpreters”. One of the main sources of frustration was this latter category of resources, because the inter- preters they explain only interpret languages with a really simple syntax. I didn’t want to take a shortcut! I truly wanted to understand how interpreters work and that included understand- ing how lexers and parsers work. Especially with a C-like language and its curly braces and semicolons, where I didn’t even know how to start parsing them. The academic textbooks had the answers I was looking for, of course. But rather inaccessible to me, behind their lengthy, theoretical explanations and mathematical notation. What I wanted was something between the 900 page book on compilers and the blog post that explains how to write a Lisp interpreter in 50 lines of Ruby code. So I wrote this book, for you and me. This is the book I wish I had. This is a book for people who love to look under the hood. For people that love to learn by understanding how something really works. In this book we’re going to write our own interpreter for our own programming language - from scratch. We won’t be using any 3rd party tools and libraries. The result won’t be production- ready, it won’t have the performance of a fully-fledged interpreter and, of course, the language it’s built to interpret will be missing features. But we’re going to learn a lot. 4 It’s difficult to make generic statements about interpreters since the variety is so highandnone are alike. What can be said is that the one fundamental attribute they all share is that they take source code and evaluate it without producing some visible, intermediate result that can later be executed. That’s in contrast to compilers, which take source code and produce output in another language that the underlying system can understand. Some interpreters are really small, tiny, and do not even bother with a parsing step. They just interpret the input right away. Look at one of the many Brainfuck interpreters out there to see what I mean. On the other end of the spectrum are much more elaborate types of interpreters. Highly optimized and using advanced parsing and evaluation techniques. Some of them don’t just evaluate their input, but compile it into an internal representation called bytecode and then evaluate this. Even more advanced are JIT interpreters that compile the input just-in-time into native machine code that gets then executed. But then, in between those two categories, there are interpreters that parse the source code, build an abstract
Recommended publications
  • Computations in Algebraic Geometry with Macaulay 2
    Computations in algebraic geometry with Macaulay 2 Editors: D. Eisenbud, D. Grayson, M. Stillman, and B. Sturmfels Preface Systems of polynomial equations arise throughout mathematics, science, and engineering. Algebraic geometry provides powerful theoretical techniques for studying the qualitative and quantitative features of their solution sets. Re- cently developed algorithms have made theoretical aspects of the subject accessible to a broad range of mathematicians and scientists. The algorith- mic approach to the subject has two principal aims: developing new tools for research within mathematics, and providing new tools for modeling and solv- ing problems that arise in the sciences and engineering. A healthy synergy emerges, as new theorems yield new algorithms and emerging applications lead to new theoretical questions. This book presents algorithmic tools for algebraic geometry and experi- mental applications of them. It also introduces a software system in which the tools have been implemented and with which the experiments can be carried out. Macaulay 2 is a computer algebra system devoted to supporting research in algebraic geometry, commutative algebra, and their applications. The reader of this book will encounter Macaulay 2 in the context of concrete applications and practical computations in algebraic geometry. The expositions of the algorithmic tools presented here are designed to serve as a useful guide for those wishing to bring such tools to bear on their own problems. A wide range of mathematical scientists should find these expositions valuable. This includes both the users of other programs similar to Macaulay 2 (for example, Singular and CoCoA) and those who are not interested in explicit machine computations at all.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pretzel User Manual
    The PretzelBook second edition Felix G¨artner June 11, 1998 2 Contents 1 Introduction 5 1.1 Do Prettyprinting the Pretzel Way . 5 1.2 History . 6 1.3 Acknowledgements . 6 1.4 Changes to second Edition . 6 2 Using Pretzel 7 2.1 Getting Started . 7 2.1.1 A first Example . 7 2.1.2 Running Pretzel . 9 2.1.3 Using Pretzel Output . 9 2.2 Carrying On . 10 2.2.1 The Two Input Files . 10 2.2.2 Formatted Tokens . 10 2.2.3 Regular Expressions . 10 2.2.4 Formatted Grammar . 11 2.2.5 Prettyprinting with Format Instructions . 12 2.2.6 Formatting Instructions . 13 2.3 Writing Prettyprinting Grammars . 16 2.3.1 Modifying an existing grammar . 17 2.3.2 Writing a new Grammar from Scratch . 17 2.3.3 Context Free versus Context Sensitive . 18 2.3.4 Available Grammars . 19 2.3.5 Debugging Prettyprinting Grammars . 19 2.3.6 Experiences . 21 3 Pretzel Hacking 23 3.1 Adding C Code to the Rules . 23 3.1.1 Example for Tokens . 23 3.1.2 Example for Grammars . 24 3.1.3 Summary . 25 3.1.4 Tips and Tricks . 26 3.2 The Pretzel Interface . 26 3.2.1 The Prettyprinting Scanner . 27 3.2.2 The Prettyprinting Parser . 28 3.2.3 Example . 29 3.3 Building a Pretzel prettyprinter by Hand . 30 3.4 Obtaining a Pretzel Prettyprinting Module . 30 3.4.1 The Prettyprinting Scanner . 30 3.4.2 The Prettyprinting Parser . 31 3.5 Multiple Pretzel Modules in the same Program .
    [Show full text]
  • GOOL: a Generic Object-Oriented Language (Extended Version)
    GOOL: A Generic Object-Oriented Language (extended version) Jacques Carette Brooks MacLachlan W. Spencer Smith Department of Computing and Department of Computing and Department of Computing and Software Software Software McMaster University McMaster University McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Hamilton, Ontario, Canada [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract it to the others. Of course, this can be made to work — one We present GOOL, a Generic Object-Oriented Language. It could engineer a multi-language compiler (such as gcc) to demonstrates that a language, with the right abstractions, de-compile its Intermediate Representation (IR) into most can capture the essence of object-oriented programs. We of its input languages. The end-results would however be show how GOOL programs can be used to generate human- wildly unidiomatic; roughly the equivalent of a novice in a readable, documented and idiomatic source code in multi- new (spoken) language “translating” word-by-word. ple languages. Moreover, in GOOL, it is possible to express What if, instead, there was a single meta-language de- common programming idioms and patterns, from simple signed to embody the common semantic concepts of a num- library-level functions, to simple tasks (command-line argu- ber of OO languages, encoded so that the necessary informa- ments, list processing, printing), to more complex patterns, tion for translation is present? This source language could such as methods with a mixture of input, output and in-out be agnostic about what eventual target language will be used parameters, and finally Design Patterns (such as Observer, – and free of the idiosyncratic details of any given language.
    [Show full text]
  • REDUCE User's Manual
    REDUCE User’s Manual Version 3.8 Anthony C. Hearn Santa Monica, CA, USA Email: [email protected] February 2004 Copyright c 2004 Anthony C. Hearn. All rights reserved. Registered system holders may reproduce all or any part of this publication for internal purposes, provided that the source of the material is clearly acknowledged, and the copyright notice is retained. Contents Abstract 11 1 Introductory Information 15 2 Structure of Programs 19 2.1 The REDUCE Standard Character Set............... 19 2.2 Numbers............................... 19 2.3 Identifiers.............................. 21 2.4 Variables.............................. 22 2.5 Strings................................ 23 2.6 Comments.............................. 23 2.7 Operators.............................. 24 3 Expressions 27 3.1 Scalar Expressions......................... 27 3.2 Integer Expressions......................... 28 3.3 Boolean Expressions........................ 29 3.4 Equations.............................. 30 3.5 Proper Statements as Expressions................. 31 4 Lists 33 4.1 Operations on Lists......................... 33 4.1.1 LIST............................ 34 4.1.2 FIRST............................ 34 1 2 CONTENTS 4.1.3 SECOND.......................... 34 4.1.4 THIRD........................... 34 4.1.5 REST............................ 34 4.1.6 : (Cons) Operator...................... 34 4.1.7 APPEND.......................... 34 4.1.8 REVERSE......................... 35 4.1.9 List Arguments of Other Operators............ 35 4.1.10 Caveats and Examples................... 35 5 Statements 37 5.1 Assignment Statements....................... 38 5.1.1 Set Statement........................ 38 5.2 Group Statements.......................... 39 5.3 Conditional Statements....................... 39 5.4 FOR Statements........................... 40 5.5 WHILE . DO........................... 42 5.6 REPEAT . UNTIL......................... 43 5.7 Compound Statements....................... 43 5.7.1 Compound Statements with GO TO............ 45 5.7.2 Labels and GO TO Statements..............
    [Show full text]
  • Sif: Tutorial and Reference Manual
    Sif Mjølner BETA Source Browser and Editor Tutorial and Reference Manual Mjølner Informatics Report MIA 90-11(2.1) August 1996 Copyright © 1990-96 Mjølner Informatics ApS. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be copied or distributed without prior written permission from Mjølner Informatics Contents 1. Introduction .........................................................................................................1 2. Basic User Interface Principles ...........................................................................5 2.1. The Mouse...............................................................................................5 2.2. Selection..................................................................................................5 3. Source Browser Tutorial .....................................................................................7 3.1. How to Get Started..................................................................................7 3.2. Browsing .................................................................................................8 3.3. Browsing ...............................................................................................10 3.4. Browsing at Code Level........................................................................11 3.4.1. Abstract Presentation.................................................................11 3.4.2. Semantic Links ..........................................................................12 3.4.3. Comments..................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Deriving Pretty-Printing for Haskell
    Deriving Pretty-printing for Haskell Yi Zhen Master of Science School of Informatics University of Edinburgh 2016 Abstract Print information of data type values can be used to help programmers understand the nature and the way the structure of instances of a certain data type is generated. This work aims to provide an interface wrapper which includes a pre-designed indentation format for printing arbitrary data types, called a pretty printer. It can be seen as an extension of the Show library which converts the value of the data type to a printable string in Haskell. This report describes the design, implementation and evaluation of such a pretty-printing library. The overall result is a pretty printer intended to be available, easy-to-use, and interesting for programmers to print the data type value in a visually appealing way. i Acknowledgements Many thanks to my supervisor Prof. Philip Wadler for the guidance and numerous explanations; and to my parents, for food and a place to live. ii Declaration I declare that this thesis was composed by myself, that the work contained herein is my own except where explicitly stated otherwise in the text, and that this work has not been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification except as specified. (Yi Zhen) iii Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Introduction and Purpose . .1 1.2 How to Use Pretty-printing in Haskell . .2 1.3 Related Work . .5 2 Background 7 2.1 Haskell . .8 2.1.1 Introduction . .8 2.1.2 Data Type in Haskell .
    [Show full text]
  • Sle18-Indentation-Rules
    Delft University of Technology Declarative specification of indentation rules A tooling perspective on parsing and pretty-printing layout-sensitive languages de Souza Amorim, Luís Eduardo; Erdweg, Sebastian; Steindorfer, Michael J.; Visser, Eelco DOI 10.1145/3276604.3276607 Publication date 2018 Document Version Accepted author manuscript Published in SLE 2018 - Proceedings of the 11th ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Soft ware Language Engineering Citation (APA) de Souza Amorim, L. E., Erdweg, S., Steindorfer, M. J., & Visser, E. (2018). Declarative specification of indentation rules: A tooling perspective on parsing and pretty-printing layout-sensitive languages. In D. Pearce , S. Friedrich, & T. Mayerhofer (Eds.), SLE 2018 - Proceedings of the 11th ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Soft ware Language Engineering (pp. 3-15). Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/10.1145/3276604.3276607 Important note To cite this publication, please use the final published version (if applicable). Please check the document version above. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons. Takedown policy Please contact us and provide details if you believe this document breaches copyrights. We will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. This work is downloaded from Delft University of Technology. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to a maximum of 10. Declarative Specification of Indentation Rules A Tooling Perspective on Parsing and Pretty-Printing Layout-Sensitive Languages Luís Eduardo de Souza Amorim Michael J.
    [Show full text]
  • May Be Protected (Title 17 U.S.C.)
    UCI LISP MANUAL by Robert J. Bobrow Richard R= Burton Jeffrey lU Jacobs ' Daryle Lewis Notice: This Material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17 U.S.C.) Department of Information and Computer Science University of California, Irvine TECHNICAL REPORT #21 updated 10/73 Table of Contents. Introduction Oo 0 Debugging Facilities 1» 1 Introduction 1= 1 Temporarily Interrupting a Computation 1» 5 BREAKl - The Function that Supervises all Breaks 1= 6 What You Can Do In a Break 1- 8 Break.Commands 1. 8 Leaving a break with a value (0K,GO,EVAL,FROM ?) 1.8 Correction of UNBOUMD ATOM and UNDEFINED FUNCTION errors (>, USE) 1. 9 Aborting to Higher Breaks or the Top Level (t, TT) 1-10 Examining and Modifying the Context of a Break 1.11 Searching for a Context on the Stack 1.11 Editing a Form on the Context Stack 1.12 Evaluating a Form in a Higher Context 1.12 Backtrace Commands Printing the Functions, Forms and Variable Bindings on the Context Stack 1.15 Breakmacros User Defined Break Commands 1.17 How to Use the Break Package 1.18 Setting a Break to Investigate a Function 1.18 Tracing the Execution of Functions 1.19 Setting a Break INSIDE a Function 1.19 Removing Breaks and Traces 1.21 Using BREAKO Directly to Obtain Special Effects from the Break Package 1.23 Error Package - Getting Automatic Breaks 'When Errors Occur 1.24 Summary of Break Commands 1.25 The LISP Editor 2o 1 Introduction 2. 2 Coinmands for the Nev/ User 2.1Q Attention Changing Commands 2.15 Local Attention Changing Commands 2.16 Commands That Search 2.22 Search Algorithm 2.24
    [Show full text]
  • PIPS High-Level Software Interface Pipsmake Configuration
    PIPS High-Level Software Interface Pipsmake Configuration R´emiTriolet, Fran¸coisIrigoin and many other contributors MINES ParisTech Math´ematiqueset Syst`emes Centre de Recherche en Informatique 77305 Fontainebleau Cedex France Id: pipsmake-rc.tex 23481 2018-08-22 19:35:27Z ancourt You can get a printable version of this document on http://www.cri.ensmp.fr/pips/pipsmake-rc.htdoc/ pipsmake-rc.pdf and a HTML version on http://www.cri.ensmp.fr/pips/pipsmake-rc.htdoc. Chapter 1 Introduction This paper describes high-level objects and functions that are potentially user- visible in a PIPS 1 [33] interactive environment. It defines the internal software interface between a user interface and program analyses and transformations. This is clearly not a user guide but can be used as a reference guide, the best one before source code because PIPS user interfaces are very closely mapped on this document: some of their features are automatically derived from it. Objects can be viewed and functions activated by one of PIPS existing user interfaces: tpips2, the tty style interface which is currently recommended, pips3 [11], the old batch interface, improved by many shell scripts4, wpips and epips, the X-Window System interfaces. The epips interface is an extension of wpips which uses Emacs to display more information in a more convenient way. Unfortunately, right now these window-based interfaces are no longer working and have been replaced by gpips. It is also possible to use PIPS through a Python API, pyps. From a theoretical point of view, the object types and functions available in PIPS define an heterogeneous algebra with constructors (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Prettyprinting
    Prettyprinting DEREK C. OPPEN Stanford University An algorithm for prettyprinting is given. For an input stream of length n and an output device with linewidth m, the algorithm requires time O(n) and space O(m). The algorithm is described in terms of two parallel processes: the first scans the input stream to determine the space required to print logical blocks of tokens; the second uses this information to decide where to break lines of text; the two processes communicate by means of a buffer of size O(m). The algorithm does not wait for the entire stream to be input, but begins printing as soon as it has received a full line of input. The algorithm is easily implemented. Key Words and Phrases: prettyprinting, formating, paragraphing, text editing, program manipulation CR Category: 4.12 1. INTRODUCTION A prettyprinter takes as input a stream of characters and prints them with aesthetically appropriate indentations and line breaks. As an example, consider the following stream: vat x: integer; y: char; begin x := 1; y := 'a' end If our line width is 40 characters, we might want it printed as follows: vat x: integer; y: char; begin x :--- 1; y := 'a' end If our line width is 30 characters, we might want it printed as follows: vat x : integer; y: char; begin X := I; y := 'a'; end But under no circumstances do we want to see vat x: integer; y: char; begin x := 1; y := 'a'; end Permission to copy without fee all or part of this material is granted provided that the copies are not made or distributed for direct commercial advantage, the ACM copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date appear, and notice is given that copying is by permission of the Association for Computing Machinery.
    [Show full text]
  • Combining LATEX with Python
    Combining LATEX with Python Uwe Ziegenhagen August 9, 2019 Dante e. V. Heidelberg 1 About me • Uwe Ziegenhagen, from Cologne, Germany • In-house analyst in banking and private equity • Responsible for developing and maintaining individual software applications • Teacher for IT-related subjects at a private University of Applied Sciences 2 What’s this talk about? • LATEX-files are pure text files, so pretty much any programming language can be used to create them • Python has been my favourite programming language • Python is sufficiently fast, easy to learn and has a huge set of libraries • This talk is about Python and the way we can utilize it with LATEX 3 Today’s Topics • Introducing Python • Creating LATEX files with Python • Running Python from within LATEX 4 Python • Is a general purpose scripting language • Comes with a rich standard library ) “batteries included” • Was invented 1991 by Guido van Rossum at the Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica in the Netherlands, Version 1.0 in 1994 • Comes in version 2.7 and 3.x ) use version 3! 5 Python Design Philosophy • Open source • Simple, intuitive, but incredibly powerful • Source code as readable as plain English • Is suitable for everyday jobs as well as for machine learning • Offers short development cycles • Uses indentation, not brackets 6 Some basic Python The usual “Hello World!” 1 print(’Hello’+’’+’World’) Some function definition 1 def addTwo(a,b): 2 returna+b 3 4 print(addTwo(5,3)) 5 print(addTwo(’U’,’S’)) Interation over lists, arrays, etc. 1 some_string=’Hello TUG!’ 2 fori in some_string:
    [Show full text]
  • Declarative Specification of Template-Based Textual Editors
    Declarative Specification of Template-Based Textual Editors Tobi Vollebregt, Lennart C. L. Kats, and Eelco Visser Software Engineering Research Group Delft University of Technology The Netherlands [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract Syntax discoverability has been a crucial advantage of structure editors for new users of a language. Despite this advantage, structure editors have not been widely adopted. Based on immediate parsing and analyses, mod- ern textual code editors are also increasingly syntax-aware: structure and textual editors are converging into a new editing paradigm that combines text and templates. Current text-based language workbenches require re- dundant specification of the ingredients for a template-based editor, which is detrimental to the quality of syntactic completion, as consistency and completeness of the definition cannot be guaranteed. In this paper we describe the design and implementation of a speci- fication language for syntax definition based on templates. It unifies the specification of parsers, unparsers and template-based editors. We evalu- ate the template language by application to two domain-specific languages used for tax benefits and mobile applications. 1 Introduction Language-aware structure editors provide a template-based paradigm for editing programs. They allow composing programs by selecting a template and filling in the placeholders, which can again be extended using templates. A crucial advan- tage of structure editors is syntax discoverability, helping new users to learn the language by presenting possible syntactic completions in a menu. Structure ed- itors can be automatically generated from a syntax definition. Notable projects aiming at automatic generation of structure editors include MPS [23] and the Intentional Domain Workbench [19].
    [Show full text]