Protein Structure Prediction Bioinformatics Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Protein Structure Prediction Bioinformatics Pdf Protein structure prediction bioinformatics pdf Continue Go to the main content In this article lead section to be expanded. Please consider expanding the lead to provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article. (February 2017) Composite amino acids can be analyzed to predict the secondary, tertiary and quay structure of the protein. Predicting the structure of a protein is the output of the three-dimensional structure of a protein from its amino acid sequence, i.e. predicting its folding and its secondary and tertiary structure from its primary structure. Predicting structure is fundamentally different from the reverse problem of protein design. Protein structure prediction is one of the most important goals to ride bioinformatics and theoretical chemistry; this is very important in medicine (e.g. drug development) and biotechnology (e.g. in the development of new enzymes). Every two years, the effectiveness of modern methods is assessed in the CASP (Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Forecasting Methods). A continuous assessment of the web servers predicting the structure of the protein is carried out by the community project CAMEO3D. Protein structure and terminology Protein chains of amino acids combined with peptide bonds. Many conformations of this chain are possible because of the rotation of the chain around each atom C. It is these conformal changes responsible for differences in the three-dimensional structure of proteins. Each amino acid in the polar chain, i.e. it separates positive and negative charged regions with a free carbonyl group that can act as a host of hydrogen bonds and the NH group, which can act as a donor to hydrogen bonds. Thus, these groups can interact in the structure of the protein. 20 amino acids can be classified according to lateral chain chemistry, which also plays an important structural role. Glycine occupies a special position, as it has the slightest side chain, only one hydrogen atom, and therefore can increase local flexibility in the structure of the protein. Cysteine, on the other hand, can react with another residue of cysteine and thus form a cross-bond of stabilization of the entire structure. The protein structure can be considered as a sequence of secondary structure elements, such as α helices and β sheets, which together make up the overall three-dimensional configuration of the protein chain. In these secondary structures, regular H-link patterns are formed between neighboring amino acids, and amino acids have similar Φ and Ψ angles. The communication angles for Φ and ψ The formation of these structures neutralizes the polar groups on each amino acid. The secondary structures are tightly packed into the protein core in a hydrophobic environment. Each amino acid lateral group has a limited volume to occupy and a limited number of possible interactions with other nearby side chains, the situation should be taken into account in molecular modeling and alignment. In the α Helix Main: α spiral α spiral is the most common type of secondary protein structure. In α has 3.6 amino acids per turn with H bond formed between every fourth residue; The average length is 10 amino acids (3 turns) or 10, but ranges from 5 to 40 (1.5 to 11 turns). The alignment of H bonds creates a dipole moment for the spiral with a partial positive charge at the amino end of the spiral. Because this region has free NH2 groups, it will interact with negatively charged groups such as phosphates. The most common place α on the surface of protein nuclei where they provide an interface with an aqueous environment. The inside of the spiral tends to have hydrophobic amino acids and external lateral hydrophilic amino acids. Thus, one third of the four amino acids along the chain are usually hydrophobic, a pattern that can be quite easily detected. In the motif of lightning leucine, the repetitive pattern of leucines on the sides of the cladding of two adjacent gels very predicts the motive. In order to show this repetition, you can use a heliko-wheeled plot. Other α found in the protein nucleus or in cell membranes have a higher and regular distribution of hydrophobic amino acids and are highly predictable. The gels on the surface have a lower proportion of hydrophobic amino acids. The amino acid content can predict α area. Regions richer in alanine (A), glutamic acid (E), leucine (L) and methionine (M) and poorer in proline (P), glycine (G), tyrosine (Y) and serina (S) tend to form a spiral α. Proline destabilizes or breaks α spirals, but can be present in longer lycolins, forming a bend. Alpha spiral with hydrogen bonds (yellow dots) β sheet Main article: β sheet β sheets formed H connections between an average of 5-10 consecutive amino acids in one part of the chain with the other 5-10 further down the chain. Interacting regions can be adjacent, with a short cycle between them or far apart, with other structures between them. Each chain can work in one direction to form a parallel sheet, any other chain can work in the opposite chemical direction to form an anti parallel sheet, or the chains can be parallel and anti parallel to form a mixed sheet. The H communication pattern differs in parallel and anti-parallel configurations. Each amino acid in the inner strands of the leaf forms two H-links with neighboring amino acids, while each amino acid on the outer strands forms only one connection with the internal filament. Looking across the sheet at right angles to the strands, the more distant strands rotate a little counterclockwise to form Twist. THE ATOMs alternate above and below the sheet in a pleated pleated and R side groups of amino acids alternate above and below the crease. The angles Φ and Ψ amino acids in the sheets vary considerably in one region of the Ramachandran area. Predicting the location of these sheets is more difficult β than α hedicates. The situation improves somewhat when amino acid changes in multiple alignment sequences are taken into account. Loop loops are regions of the protein chain that are 1) between α helices and β sheets, 2) different lengths and three-dimensional configurations, and 3) on the surface of the structure. The stud loops that represent a complete twist in the polypeptide chain attaching two β strands can be as short as two amino acids in length. Loops interact with the surrounding aqueous environment and other proteins. Since the amino acids in the loops are not limited to space and the environment, like amino acids in the main area, and do not affect the location of secondary structures in the nucleus, there may be more substitutions, inserts and removals. Thus, when the sequence is aligned, the presence of these functions can be a sign of a loop. The positions of the introns in the genomic DNA sometimes correspond to the location of the loops in the encoded protein. Loops also tend to have charged and polar amino acids and are often a component of active sites. A detailed study of cyclical structures has shown that they fall into separate families. The coil area is a secondary structure that is not α a spiral, β sheet, or a recognizable turn commonly referred to as a coil. Protein classification of proteins can be classified according to structural similarity and sequence. For structural classification, the dimensions and spatial mechanisms of the secondary structures described in the above paragraph are compared in known three-dimensional structures. The classification, based on the similarity of the sequence, has historically been the first one to be used. Initially, similarities were performed, based on alignment of whole sequences. Later proteins were classified based on the appearance of preserved amino acid models. Databases are available by classifying proteins by one or more of these schemes. When considering protein classification patterns, it is important to keep in mind several observations. First, two completely different protein sequences from different evolutionary sources can develop into a similar structure. Conversely, the sequence of the ancient gene for this structure may have diverged significantly in different species while maintaining the same basic structural features. Recognizing any remaining similarity of consistency in such cases can be a very difficult task. Second, the two proteins, which have a significant degree of sequence similarity either to each other or to a third sequence, also have an evolutionary origin and should function as well. However, gene duplication and genetic permutations in the evolutionary process can lead to new copies of genes, which can then turn into proteins with a new function and structure. Terms used to classify protein structures and sequences are more commonly used terms for evolutionary and structural relationships between proteins listed below. Many additional terms are used for different types of structural features found in proteins. Descriptions of these terms can be found on the CATH website, on the Structural Protein Classification website (SCOP) and in the Glaxo Wellcome tutorial on The Swiss Bioinformatics website Expasy. Active location is a localized combination of amino acid lateral groups in a tertiary (three-dimensional) or four-dimensional (protein sub-edinice) structure that can interact with a chemically specific substrate and which provides protein biological activity. Proteins of very different amino acid sequences can add up to a structure that produces the same active site. Architecture is the relative orientation of secondary structures in a three-dimensional structure without considering whether they have a similar cycle structure. Fold (topology) a type of architecture that also has a saved cycle structure. Blocks are a preserved amino acid sequence in a family of proteins.
Recommended publications
  • Intro Key Concepts Med Chem1
    Introduction This volume is part of Elsevier’s Learning Trends series. Elsevier Science & Technology Books provides this series of free digital volumes to support and encourage learning and development across the sciences. Titles include content excerpts focused on a central theme to give the reader an introduction to new ideas and information on that topic. This volume in Chemistry Learning Trends introduces readers to a key chapter from the 4th edition of Camille Wermuth’s Practice of Medicinal Chemistry and highlights the interdisciplinary nature of medicinal chemistry. The succeeding articles, from the ScienceDirect Reference Module in Chemistry, Molecular Sciences and Chemical Engineering, will introduce readers to important themes and valuable methods raised in this chapter. Thank you for being a part of the Elsevier community! Table of Contents 1) The Practice of Medicinal Chemistry 4thEdition – Chapter 3 Drug Targets, Target Identification, Validation and Screening by Walter MM Van den Broeck 2) Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Chemistry by Timmerman 3) Perspectives in Drug Discovery by W.T. Comer 4) LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY | Affinity Chromatography by D.S. Hage 5) Microarrays by D. Amaratunga H. Göhlmann & P.J. Peeters 6) Systems Biology by L. Coulier, S. Wopereis, C. Rubingh, H. Hendriks, M. Radonjić & R.H. Jellema 7) Comparative Modeling of Drug Target Proteins by B. Webb, N. Eswar, H. Fan, N. Khuri, U. Pieper, G.Q. Dong & A. Sali CHAPTER 3 Drug Targets, Target Identification, Validation, and Screening Walter M.M. Van den Broeck Janssen Infectious Diseases BVBA, Beerse, Belgium OUTLINE I. Introduction 45 C. Haploinsufficiency Profiling in Yeast 58 D. Analysis of Resistant Mutants 59 II.
    [Show full text]
  • Distance-Based Protein Folding Powered by Deep Learning Jinbo Xu Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago 6045 S Kenwood, IL, 60637, USA [email protected]
    Distance-based Protein Folding Powered by Deep Learning Jinbo Xu Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago 6045 S Kenwood, IL, 60637, USA [email protected] Contact-assisted protein folding has made very good progress, but two challenges remain. One is accurate contact prediction for proteins lack of many sequence homologs and the other is that time-consuming folding simulation is often needed to predict good 3D models from predicted contacts. We show that protein distance matrix can be predicted well by deep learning and then directly used to construct 3D models without folding simulation at all. Using distance geometry to construct 3D models from our predicted distance matrices, we successfully folded 21 of the 37 CASP12 hard targets with a median family size of 58 effective sequence homologs within 4 hours on a Linux computer of 20 CPUs. In contrast, contacts predicted by direct coupling analysis (DCA) cannot fold any of them in the absence of folding simulation and the best CASP12 group folded 11 of them by integrating predicted contacts into complex, fragment- based folding simulation. The rigorous experimental validation on 15 CASP13 targets show that among the 3 hardest targets of new fold our distance-based folding servers successfully folded 2 large ones with <150 sequence homologs while the other servers failed on all three, and that our ab initio folding server also predicted the best, high-quality 3D model for a large homology modeling target. Further experimental validation in CAMEO shows that our ab initio folding server predicted correct fold for a membrane protein of new fold with 200 residues and 229 sequence homologs while all the other servers failed.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER 5.6.32
    Comparative Protein Structure Modeling UNIT 5.6 Using MODELLER Benjamin Webb1 and Andrej Sali1 1University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California ABSTRACT Functional characterization of a protein sequence is one of the most frequent problems in biology. This task is usually facilitated by accurate three-dimensional (3-D) structure of the studied protein. In the absence of an experimentally determined structure, comparative or homology modeling can sometimes provide a useful 3-D model for a protein that is related to at least one known protein structure. Comparative modeling predicts the 3-D structure of a given protein sequence (target) based primarily on its alignment to one or more proteins of known structure (templates). The prediction process consists of fold assignment, target-template alignment, model building, and model evaluation. This unit describes how to calculate comparative models using the program MODELLER and discusses all four steps of comparative modeling, frequently observed errors, and some applications. Modeling lactate dehydrogenase from Trichomonas vaginalis (TvLDH) is described as an example. The download and installation of the MODELLER software is also described. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 47:5.6.1-5.6.32. C 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Keywords: Modeller r protein structure r comparative modeling r structure prediction r protein fold INTRODUCTION Functional characterization of a protein sequence is one of the most frequent problems in biology. This task is usually facilitated by an accurate three-dimensional (3-D) structure of the studied protein. In the absence of an experimentally determined structure, comparative or homology modeling often provides a useful 3-D model for a protein that is related to at least one known protein structure (Marti-Renom et al., 2000; Fiser, 2004; Misura and Baker, 2005; Petrey and Honig, 2005; Misura et al., 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • "Protein Structure and Function Prediction
    Protein Structure and Function UNIT 5.8 Prediction Using I-TASSER Jianyi Yang1,2 and Yang Zhang1,3 1Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 2School of Mathematical Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China 3Department of Biological Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan I-TASSER is a hierarchical protocol for automated protein structure prediction and structure-based function annotation. Starting from the amino acid sequence of target proteins, I-TASSERfirst generates full-length atomic structural models from multiple threading alignments and iterative structural assembly simula- tions followed by atomic-level structure refinement. The biological functions of the protein, including ligand-binding sites, enzyme commission number, and gene ontology terms, are then inferred from known protein function databases based on sequence and structure profile comparisons. I-TASSER is freely avail- able as both an on-line server and a stand-alone package. This unit describes how to use the I-TASSER protocol to generate structure and function prediction and how to interpret the prediction results, as well as alternative approaches for further improving the I-TASSER modeling quality for distant-homologous and multi-domain protein targets. C 2015 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Keywords: protein structure prediction r protein function annotation r I- TASSER r threading How to cite this article: Yang J., and Zhang Y., 2015. Protein structure and function prediction using I-TASSER. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 52:5.8.1-5.8.15. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0508s52 INTRODUCTION Proteins are the ‘workhorse’ molecules of life that participate in essentially every cellular process.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using Modeller ABSTRACT
    • UNIT 5.6 Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using Modeller ABSTRACT Functional characterization of a protein sequence is one of the most frequent problems in biology. This task is usually facilitated by accurate three-dimensional (3-D) structure of the studied protein. In the absence of an experimentally determined structure, comparative or homology modeling can sometimes provide a useful 3-D model for a protein that is related to at least one known protein structure. Comparative modeling predicts the 3-D structure of a given protein sequence (target) based primarily on its alignment to one or more proteins of known structure (templates). The prediction process consists of fold assignment, target-template alignment, model building, and model evaluation. This unit describes how to calculate comparative models using the program MODELLER and how to use the ModBase database of such models, and discusses all four steps of comparative modeling, frequently observed errors, and some applications. Modeling lactate dehydrogenase from Trichomonas vaginalis (TvLDH) is described as an example. The download and installation of the MODELLER software is also described. Keyword Group: Modeller ● ModBase ● protein structure ● comparative modeling ● structure prediction ● protein fold Subject Group: Structural Analysis of Biomolecules ● Modeling Structure and Biomolecular Engineering ● Bioinformatics ● Molecular Modeling Functional characterization of a protein sequence is one of the most frequent problems in biology. This task is usually facilitated by an accurate three-dimensional (3-D) structure of the studied protein. In the absence of an experimentally determined structure, comparative or homology modeling often provides a useful 3-D model for a protein that is related to at least one known protein structure (Marti-Renom et al., 2000; Fiser, 2004; Misura and Baker, 2005; Petrey and Honig, 2005; Misura et al., 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • CASP13 Abstracts.Pdf
    CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF TECHNIQUES FOR PROTEIN STRUCTURE PREDICTION 13 Thirteenth meeting Riviera Maya, Mexico DECEMBER 1-4, 2018 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3DCNN (TS) .......................................................................................................................................................................... 9 PROTEIN MODEL QUALITY ASSESSMENT USING 3D ORIENTED CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK ................................................................ 9 3DCNN (REFINEMENT) ....................................................................................................................................................... 10 REFINEMENT OF PROTEIN MODELS WITH ADDITIONAL CROSS-LINKING INFORMATION USING THE GAUSSIAN NETWORK AND GRADIENT DESCENT .. 10 A7D ................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 DE NOVO STRUCTURE PREDICTION WITH DEEP-LEARNING BASED SCORING.............................................................................................. 11 AIR ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 AIR: AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-BASED PROTOCOL FOR PROTEIN STRUCTURE REFINEMENT USING MULTI-OBJECTIVE PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION ..........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Protein Structure Prediction Rachel
    From: Nurul Affiah Binte Sahrin Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2017 9:07 AM To: Ting Ai Hua Cc: Rachel Seah Mei Hui Subject: FW: RE: FW: Re: Fw: 巜物理学报》软物质专题英文版 Dear Ai Hua, Please kindly refer to the email below. I will come down later and explain to u in detailed Name of Journal: 物理学报 Article title: 水的奇异性质与液液相变 December 11, 2017 9:5 IJMPB S021797921840009X page 1 Thanks & Regards, Affiah Sahrin(Ms) Journal Publishing Administrator World Scientific Publishing Company 5 Toh Tuck Link Singapore 596224 From: Rachel Seah Mei Hui Monday, 6 November, 2017 3:46 PM International Journal of ModernSent: Physics B Vol. 32 (2018) 1840009 (17 pages)To: Nurul Affiah Binte Sahrin <[email protected]> c World Scientific PublishingSubject: Company FW: RE: FW: Re: Fw: 巜物理学报》软物质专题英文版 DOI: 10.1142/S021797921840009X Dear Affiah, Could we try implementing the new layout that you suggested, but add to the back of the citation: Please cite the original DOI. Also, put in brackets the Chinese name of the journal 物理学报 and the Chinese title of the article? Do let me know if you need help with that. Let’s do a sample layout before we typeset all the papers. Thanks Best regards, Protein structure prediction Rachel Haiyou发件人: Deng Rachel∗, YaSeah Jia Meiy and Hui Yang Zhangz;x 发送时间: 2017-11-06∗ 10:39:05 收件人: StevenCollege Shi Hong of Science, Bing - EXT 抄送:Huazhong Agricultural University, 主题:Wuhan RE: FW: 430070, Re: Fw: P.巜物理学报》软物质专题英文版 R. China yCollegeDear Steven, of Physical Science and Technology, Central China Normal University, I do agreeWuhan with their 430079, recommendation P.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Modeling of Drug Target Proteins
    This article was published in the Elsevier Reference Module in Chemistry, Molecular Sciences and Chemical Engineering, and the attached copy is provided by Elsevier for the author’s benefit and for the benefit of the author’s institution, for non-commercial research and educational use including without limitation use in instruction at your institution, sending it to specific colleagues who you know, and providing a copy to your institution’s administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution’s website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier’s permissions site at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial Webb B., Eswar N., Fan H., Khuri N., Pieper U., Dong G.Q. and Sali A. (2014) Comparative Modeling of Drug Target Proteins. In: Reedijk, J. (Ed.) Elsevier Reference Module in Chemistry, Molecular Sciences and Chemical Engineering. Waltham, MA: Elsevier. 29-Sep-14 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12- 409547-2.11133-3. © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Author's personal copy ☆ Comparative Modeling of Drug Target Proteins B Webb, N Eswar, H Fan, N Khuri, U Pieper, GQ Dong, and A Sali, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA ã 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Introduction 2 Structure-Based Drug Discovery 2 The Sequence–Structure Gap 2 Structure Prediction Addresses the Sequence–Structure
    [Show full text]