DOCSLIB.ORG

2018 Year in Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2018 YEAR IN REVIEW LAWYERS FOR CIVIL RIGHTS BOSTON Table of Contents Mission & History 2 Message from the Executive Director 3 Intake Statistics 6 BOSTON MUST Voting Rights 7 BECOME A Fighting for Immigrant Communities 9 TESTING Economic Justice Project 11 GROUND FOR Police Accountability 13 THE IDEALS OF Employment 15 FREEDOM. Education 16 Medical Legal Partnership 19 50th Anniversary Celebration Supporters & Sponsors 24 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Edward J. Barshak Fund for Justice 26 BizGrow 2018 27 Board of Directors 30 Member Firms and Organizations 32 Congressional Resolution Honors LCR 33 Boston City Council Resolution Honors LCR 35 Timeline & Case History 36 Staff, Volunteers & Interns 40 Mission & History Message from the Executive Director Our organization is a leading hub for litigation, advocacy, and resistance to discrimination. Entrenched injustice requires 21st century solutions. To stay current, we evolve. This year, in celebration of our 50th Anniversary, It’s a new day at LCR! we are reinvigorating our powerful foundations and breaking new ground. Over the past year, to further guide our work and ensure its sus- We are excited to announce that the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights tainability, our organization embarked on a comprehensive strategic and Economic Justice is now Lawyers for Civil Rights (LCR). planning and rebranding process. With the help of many of our key Lawyers for Civil Rights fosters equal opportunity and fights discrimi- constituents, we produced a dynamic vision for driving the organiza- nation on behalf of people of color and immigrants. We engage in creative tion forward as we celebrate our 50th Anniversary in 2018. and courageous legal action, education, and advocacy in collaboration Our name has changed, but our commitment to fighting discrimi- with law firms and community partners. nation remains unchanged. We know that modern-day advocacy must Our organization was founded in 1968 in the midst of riots, the after- be nimble, innovative, bold, and exciting. Our work is life-changing math of the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., and the findings and law-changing. of the Kerner Commission concluding that the nation was “moving toward Every day, our legal warriors are in the trenches litigating ground- two societies. One Black, one White – separate and unequal.” breaking cases, engaging in innovative policy advocacy, leading With funding and pro bono legal services contributed by Boston law comprehensive community education and outreach, spearheading firms, the organization became the first of eight independent local affili- community economic development, and partnering with law firms and ates of the Washington, D.C.-based Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights community groups to further the cause of civil rights. Every day, we Under Law, a national organization formed at the request of President bring people together to promote equal opportunity. Every day, we John F. Kennedy to enlist the private bar in providing legal representation fight discrimination. to address racial discrimination. From desegregating Boston’s public schools and public housing In 1973, we became the first pro bono project of the Boston Bar Asso- projects to our ongoing work to eradicate discrimination in the work- ciation and the only Lawyers’ Committee affiliate in the nation directly place, we are a catalyst for justice and equality. We are building on our connected with a major bar association. Although the organization is now rich legacy, expanding our work to make it even more diverse, inclu- separately incorporated with its own 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status, we sive, visible, and impactful. continue to maintain strong ties to the private bar in Boston. Our staff, Board of Directors, law firm partners, community allies, Membership by private law firms still forms the working foundation of and supporters are working in concert to move the struggle for civil our organization. Member law firms fund a significant part of our annual rights from the streets to the courtroom. Together, we are providing operating expenses and provide millions of dollars in pro bono legal ser- free legal services to individuals and small businesses in communities vices by working closely with the organization. In this way, for decades, that are often deprived of justice because of barriers such as race, we have harnessed the resources and talent of Boston’s leading law firms language, and national origin. to secure and protect the civil rights of Massachusetts residents. Thank you for celebrating the legacy and future of civil rights! Over the years, our organization has also grown, adding new projects Here’s to moving forward – without fail and without fear. and initiatives to respond to the changing face of discrimination. While working closely with an ever-increasing number of diverse community partners, we remain true to our core mission to challenge and eradicate all Iván Espinoza-Madrigal, Esq. forms of discrimination. Lawyers for Civil Rights (LCR) The struggle continues, but the future is bright. Lawyers for Civil Rights will continue advancing justice and equality for decades to come. 2 3 4 Intake Statistics Voting Rights As LCR enters its fiftieth year, the number of community members seek- Voting Rights Lawsuit Against Election Protection ing our legal assistance continues to grow. We serve some of the most Lowell, Massachusetts The 2018 Massachusetts state vulnerable populations in the Commonwealth, providing representation, In May 2017, together with our pro elections spotlighted the most di- counsel, advice, and referrals in a variety of civil practice areas. bono allies at Ropes & Gray, we verse slate of political leaders that filed a federal voting rights lawsuit the Commonwealth has ever seen. on behalf of a diverse coalition of In response to the swell of voters, Asian-American and Latinx resi- LCR led a critical nonpartisan voter dents of Lowell, alleging that the protection campaign to ensure that Intake Statistics city’s municipal election system every eligible voter in the Com- discriminates against communi- monwealth had equal access to the ties of color. ballot box. According to the lawsuit, the Our campaign, Massachusetts use of citywide at-large elections Election Protection, included a for all seats on the Lowell City state-wide toll-free hotline and a Council and Lowell School Com- comprehensive field program. The mittee dilutes the voting power of hotline, housed at and supported minority voters in Lowell, violating by WilmerHale, was staffed by the federal Voting Rights Act, as volunteer attorneys from our mem- well as the U.S. Constitution. The ber firms. Calls were answered complaint sets forth how although throughout Election Day, providing the city is approximately 49% mi- eligible voters with the assistance nority, both its nine-member City they needed in real-time to ensure Council and its six-member School their ability to vote. The compre- 285 404 601 780 939 Committee have been virtually hensive field program, consisting 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 all-white for all of Lowell’s histo- of more than 200 volunteers, mar- ry. In an at-large winner-take-all shalled support to communities system such as Lowell’s, 51% of the of color throughout the Common- electorate can control 100% of the wealth and served as the eyes and seats and win every election. ears for the Election Protection White Other Immigrant Justice The case is currently pending command staff. Our partners in Asian Employment in federal district court, where this effort included: ACLU of Mas- Disability / the judge has already rejected sachusetts, Anti-Defamation 76 42 2 4 Benefits 67 6 the City’s motion to dismiss. The League, Common Cause Mas- 8 4 9 8 lawsuit is believed to be the first of sachusetts, MassVOTE, and the 5 2018 Intake 2018 Intake 2 6 5 its kind in the country to be filed on League of Women Voters. Demographics Education 9 Breakdown 2 3 2 behalf of a coalition of Asian-Amer- 2 1 6 0 7 Black 1 ican and Latinx residents. Latinx Criminal Justice Housing and Policing 6 7 Fighting for Immigrant Communities Automatic Voter Registration triumphed again, ushering in legislation to Since the 2016 election, immi- the Supreme Court’s ruling on the LCR is a member of the Election Modern- create Automatic Voter Registration (AVR). grants in the United States are in Trump Administration’s “trav- ization Coalition (EMC), a small cohort of AVR will ensure that the 700,000 people in a more precarious position than el ban” and provides a model of organizations committed to modernizing the Commonwealth who are not registered to ever. With increased raids, a per- creative litigation aimed at holding the electoral process so that more eligible vote, a majority of whom reside in urban areas vasive climate of fear, and threats those in the highest echelons of individuals can register, vote, and have their with high levels of poverty, become registered to life saving programs like Tem- power to account. voices heard. EMC has made significant ac- with ease. LCR and the rest of the coalition porary Protected Status (TPS), complishments, including a successful drive are now providing their expertise and insight the fight for immigrant rights is Challenging Illegal Detentions that resulted in 2014 legislation establish- to advise on the proper implementation of front and center. LCR continues In March 2018, LCR, along with our ing state-wide early voting. This year, EMC AVR throughout the Commonwealth. to aggressively and strategically pro bono partners from Latham & advocate on behalf of immigrant Watkins LLP, filed Rivas v. Hodg- communities and to develop son, a federal lawsuit to hold Bris- creative responses to meet new tol County’s rogue sheriff, Thomas challenges. Hodgson, accountable for his anti-immigrant policies and prac- Protecting Temporary tices, and for the illegal detention Protected Status of our client.
Recommended publications
  • A New Paradigm for Fairness: the First National Conference on Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Bias in the Courts

    A New Paradigm for Fairness: the First National Conference on Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Bias in the Courts

    1.-.- 3 -4185 00322265-I 9 J A New Paradigm for Fairness: The First National Conference on Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Bias in the Courts , P A New Paradigm for Fairness: The First National Conference on Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Bias in the Courts H. Clifton Grandy, J.D Edited by Dawn Spinozza I Chuck Campbell National Center for State Courts State Justice Institute t Q 1995 National Center for State Courts ISBN 0-89656- 160-7 National Center Publication Number 'R- 180 These proceedings were prepared and reproduced with finds fiom the State Justice Insti- tute, Grant Number SJI-93- 12A-C-B- 198-P94-( l -3), for the First NationaZ Conference on Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Bias in the Courts. The points of view expressed are those of the presenters and author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Center for State Courts or the State Justice Institute. Planning Committee Honorable Veronica Simmons McBeth Chair, Planning Committee Los Angeles Municipal Court, California Honorable Benjamin Aranda 111 Dr. Yolande P. Marlow South Bay Municipal Court Project Director, Task Force on Minority California Concerns, New Jersey Marilyn Callaway Honorable Jon J. Mayeda Director, Juvenile Court Services Los Angeles Municipal Court, California San Diego, California Honorable Carl J. Character Joseph A. Myers, Esq. Court of Common Pleas, Cleveland, Ohio Executive Director National Indian Justice Center Honorable Charles R Cloud Rose M. Ochi, Esq. Norfolk General District Court, Virginia Associate Director Office of National Drug Control Policy Honorable Lewis L. Douglass Honorable Charles 2.Smith King’s County Supreme Court, New York Justice, Supreme Court of Washington Dolly M.
  • Ictj Briefing

    Ictj Briefing

    ictj briefing Virginie Ladisch Anna Myriam Roccatello The Color of Justice April 2021 Transitional Justice and the Legacy of Slavery and Racism in the United States The murders of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor in the spring of 2020 at the hands of police have set off a wave of national and international protests demanding that the United States (US) confront its unaddressed legacy of slavery and racial discrimination, manifest in persistent social and economic inequality.1 Compared with previous protest movements in the US, this time, it seems more attention is being paid to the historical roots of the grievances being voiced. Only a few years ago, following the killing of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, protests broke out calling for an array of reforms, such as body cameras and greater accountability for individual police officers. However, across the country, the continued violence against Black people by police highlights that this is not a problem of individuals. It is rather a pervasive and systemic problem that began before the nation’s founding and has been a constant through line in US history from the early colonial period to the present. This history includes the CONTENTS genocide of Native Americans, the enslavement of African Americans, and the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II. Putting an end to this continuing legacy requires an equally systemic response. A Time for Global Inspiration 2 Acknowledgment and Truth To understand what conditions led to the murder of George Floyd, and so many others Seeking 3 before him and since, it is important to analyze the past and put current grievances in Steps Toward Repair 8 historical perspective.
  • Kerner Commission Writing Exercise in July 1967, President Lyndon

    Kerner Commission Writing Exercise in July 1967, President Lyndon

    Kerner Commission Writing Exercise In July 1967, President Lyndon Johnson formed a National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. The Commission was tasked with understanding why riots were breaking out in different cities across America. The Commission would also provide recommendations on how to address these issues. Their report was finished in 1968 and became informally known as the Kerner Report, named after the Commission Chair, Otto Kerner, Jr., the Governor of Illinois at the time. The Kerner Report stated that the nation was “moving toward two societies, one black, one white—separate and unequal.” The Kerner report called out “white society” for isolating and neglecting African Americans. It recommended legislation to promote racial integration, create jobs, and provide affordable housing. President Johnson, however, rejected the recommendations. Just one month after the Kerner Report was released, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated (on April 4, 1968). Rioting broke out again in more than 100 cities after the Civil Rights leader’s death. Many people argue that some of the pivotal recommendations made in this report still remain unaddressed today. The following is the Summary Introduction from the 1968 Kerner Report. The summer of 1967 again brought racial disorders to American cities, and with them shock, fear and bewilderment to the nation. The worst came during a two-week period in July, first in Newark and then in Detroit. Each set off a chain reaction in neighboring communities. On July 28, 1967, the President of the United States established this Commission and directed us to answer three basic questions: What happened? Why did it happen? What can be done to prevent it from happening again? To respond to these questions, we have undertaken a broad range of studies and investigations.
  • September 2019

    September 2019

    September 2019 353 Southern Artery Quincy, MA 02169 A PUBLICATION OF THE MASSACHUSETTS CHARITABLE MECHANIC ASSOCIATION President’s Message I hope your summer was a good one. For those of us who attended the summer Quarterly Luncheon at Paul and Jessica Lohnes’ home in Gloucester, I am sure you would agree that day was one of the highlights of the summer. It was a beautiful day to enjoy one another’s company, spend some time at a beautiful home overlooking the ocean, and enjoy a lunch of steak and lobster. Thank you, Paul and Jessica, for welcoming us to your home. During a brief business meeting at the Quarterly, our membership voted to approve some changes to our bylaws. These changes were approved as recommended by a Bylaws Committee and by the Board of Government. The affirmative vote of the membership made them official. The changes bring our bylaws more in line with how we have actually been operating the past couple of decades. Thank you to Joe Valante and Marty Joyce, who chaired the special Bylaws Committee. With the bylaw changes, you can look for an updated “Bylaws and List of Members” book. We hope to have this available by the January meeting. Our current Bylaws and Membership book was last printed in 1998, so we have lots of new members to list as well as the revised bylaws. In June, our Planning Committee completed some of the most important work MCMA does today; selecting organizations who will receive our grants. The Committee approved about $260,000 in grants! As you know, Planning Committee members visit all grant applicants and then meet as a group to decide who will received grants.
  • Directory of Massachusetts LOBBYISTS   617.646.1000 - BOSTON - WASHINGTON DC GREG M

    Directory of Massachusetts LOBBYISTS   617.646.1000 - BOSTON - WASHINGTON DC GREG M

    Directory of Massachusetts LOBBYISTS 617.646.1000 - www.oneillandassoc.com BOSTON - WASHINGTON DC GREG M. PETER J. VICTORIA E. MARK K. MATTHEW P. D’AGOSTINO D’AGOSTINO IRETON MOLLOY MCKENNA Lobbying & Public Aairs Providing comprehensive state and municipal advocacy. PRACTICE AREAS: TRANSPORTATION | HEALTH CARE PUBLIC SAFETY | REGULATIONS | ENERGY ENVIRONMENT | CANNABIS FINANCIAL SERVICES | EMERGING INDUSTRIES 12 POST OFFICE SQUARE, 6TH FLOOR | BOSTON, MA 02109 | 6175743399 WWW.TENAXSTRATEGIES.COM David Albright Oamshri Amarasingham Cynthia Arcate Jewish Alliance for Law and Social Action American Civil Liberties PowerOptions, Inc. A 18 Tremont Street, Suite 320 Union of Massachusetts 129 South Street, 5th Floor Boston, MA 02108 211 Congress Street Boston, MA 02111 Anthony Arthur Abdelahad (617) 227-3000 Boston, MA 02110 (617) 428-4258 Ventry Associates LLP (617) 482-3170 1 Walnut Street Walter Alcorn Luz A. Arevalo Boston, MA 02108 Consumer Technology Association Robert J. Ambrogi Greater Boston, Legal Services (617) 423-0028 1919 South Eads Street Law Office of Robert Ambrogi 197 Friend Street Arlington, VA 22202 128 Main Street Boston, MA 02114 Tate Abdols (571)239-5209 Gloucester, MA 01930 (617) 603-1569 Onex Partners Advisor, Inc. (978) 317-0972 161 Bay Street Theodore J. Alexio Jr. Derek Armstrong Toronto, ON M5J 2S1 Essential Strategies Inc. Shannon Ames Bank of America, N.A. (416) 362-7711 One State Street, Suite 1100 Low Impact Hydropower Institute 100 Federal Street Boston, MA 02109 329 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 6 Boston, MA 02110 Brendan Scott Abel (617) 227-6666 Lexington, MA 02420 (617) 434-8613 Massachusetts Medical Society (781) 538-4266 860 Winter Street Waltham, MA 02451 Daniel Allegretti Gabriel Amo Kristina Ragosta Arnoux (781) 434-7682 Exelon Generation Company, LLC Magellan Health 1 Essex Drive The Home Depot 8621 Robert Fulton Drive Bow, NH 03304 166 Valley Street, 6M222 Columbia, MD 21046 Lisa C.
  • Name Classification

    Name Classification

    Form No. 10-300 (Rev. 10-74) UMTHDSTAThS DLPARTMhN I OF THt; IN'I LR1OR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF fflSTORIC PLACES INVENTORY « NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS NAME HISTORIC Chester Harding House AND/OR COMMON Chester Harding House — NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Boston VICINITY OF ML STATE COUNTY CODE Massachusetts Suffolk n?t; CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE —DISTRICT —PUBLIC ^OCCUPIED AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM XXBUILDING(S) XXpRIVATE —.UNOCCUPIED COMMERCIAL —PARK —.STRUCTURE —BOTH _ WORK IN PROGRESS EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT —IN PROCESS —YES: RESTRICTED GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC — BEING CONSIDERED —YES: UNRESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION X.NO MILITARY^ 2LPTHER: Professional nffi jOWNER OF PROPERTY NAM E Boston Bar Association, Inc. STREET& NUMBER 16 Beacon Street CITY. TOWN STATE Boston VICINITY OF Massachusetts (LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. Suffolk Registry of Deeds REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC STREETS NUMBER Suffolk County Courthouse, Somerset Street CITY. TOWN STATE Boston Massachusetts REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Inventory of Historic Assets DATE in progress .FEDERAL XXSTATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS Massachusetts Historical Commission CITY, TOWN STATE Boston Massachusetts DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE EXCELLENT _DETERIORATED _UNALTERED X_ORIGINALSITE _GOOD _RUINS X_ALTERED _MOVED DATE_ _FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The Chester Harding House stands on a nearly rectangular lot (No. 16) on the southeastern side of Beacon Street opposite the head of Bowdoin Street (which intersects Beacon at right angles) in Boston, Massachusetts. The house covers the entire lot with the exception of a small garden/courtyard at its rear (southeastern) edge.
  • Bostonbarjournala Publication of the Boston Bar Association Bostonbarjournala Publication of the Boston Bar Association

    Bostonbarjournala Publication of the Boston Bar Association Bostonbarjournala Publication of the Boston Bar Association

    SPRING 2010 SPRING 2010 BostonBarJournalA Publication of the Boston Bar Association BostonBarJournalA Publication of the Boston Bar Association Lateral Movement of Lawyers in Massachusetts — Conflicts,O’Donnell , and the Future Under Amended ABA Model Rule 1.10 Donovan v. Philip Morris: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Recognizes Medical Monitoring Claim Despite Lack of Clinically Manifest Injury Why Judges Do What They Do The Expanded Reach of the Massachusetts Lobbying Law Agreements to Arbitrate Employment Discrimination Claims: Something New or a Reminder? Board of Editors Paul G. Lannon, Jr., Chair Manisha H. Bhatt Madeleine Blake Lisa S. Burton David S. Clancy Holland & Knight Greater Boston Legal Services Greenberg Traurig WilmerHale Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom Michael A. Collora Hon. Judith Fabricant Hon. Mark V. Green Joseph Halpern Martin R. Healy Dwyer & Collora Massachusetts Superior Court Massachusetts Appeals Court Blue Cross and Blue Shield of MA Goodwin Procter J. Allen Holland Kimberly Y. Jones Edmund C. Kenealy David A. Kluft Andrea Studley Knowles Lynch Brewer Hoffman & Fink Athena Legal Strategies Group Liberty Mutual Group Foley Hoag Sugarman, Rogers, Barshak & Cohen Peter M.Lefkowitz Michael K. Loucks Constance L. Martin Martha Ann Mazzone Mark F. Murphy Oracle USA, Inc. LeClairRyan Fidelity Investments FMR Corp Wulsin Murphy Timothy M. Murphy Regina S. Rockefeller Kathleen Burdette Shields Damian W. Wilmot Hon. Gabrielle R. Wolohojian Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers Nixon Peabody U.S. Securities and Exchange Goodwin Procter Massachusetts Appeals Court Commission Statement of Editorial Policy The Boston Bar Journal is the premier publication of the Boston Bar Association. We present timely information, analysis, and opinions to more than 10,000 lawyers in nearly every practice area.
  • Catholic Clergy and Religious Sisters in the Civil Rights Movement

    Catholic Clergy and Religious Sisters in the Civil Rights Movement

    In Communion with our Brothers: Catholic Clergy and Religious Sisters in the Civil Rights Movement by Shannon Meredith Lampton A THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master Arts in History to The School of Graduate Studies of The University of Alabama in Huntsville HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA 2018 ABSTRACT School of Graduate Studies The University of Alabama in Huntsville Degree Master of Arts College/Dept. History Name of Candidate Shannon Meredith Lampton Title In Communion with our Brothers: Catholic Clergy and Religious Sisters in the Civil Rights Movement In the history of the civil rights movement there is a great deal of research, narrative, and historiography devoted to African American men and women’s participation, and of the ways African American churches worked in the movement. I researched to find out how the Catholic Church and her people participated in the civil rights movement. My main points of focus were how these men of privilege and women got involved; how the changes in the Catholic Church encouraged or hindered its members’ civil rights’ work; and how historian perceived that work. I learned that the Catholic Church did not change its teachings, but some people were confused and upset by the changes it did make and it kept them from getting involved. I also learned that there is a narrow understanding of what constitutes civil rights and that and marching is not the only way to create change. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are so many who helped and encouraged me in this process. ▪ Dr. Stephen Waring, for patience, long, wandering and often hilarious discussions, the joy of doing a thing well, and the sure understanding of when to put heel to leather and move things along ▪ Dr.
  • 1 LDF Mourns the Passing of Judge Nathaniel R. Jones Former NAACP

    1 LDF Mourns the Passing of Judge Nathaniel R. Jones Former NAACP

    LDF Mourns the Passing of Judge Nathaniel R. Jones Former NAACP General Counsel Served on Kerner Commission, Federal Bench The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) mourns the passing of Judge Nathaniel R. Jones, who died on January 26, 2020 at the age of 93. A dedicated lawyer who helped lead the charge against northern school segregation as General Counsel of the NAACP (an entirely separate entity from LDF since 1957), he was later appointed to the federal judiciary, where he served for more than 20 years. He played a key role in advancing the causes of freedom and equality on two continents, through his decades-long career as a civil rights lawyer and federal judge and as an advisor on the creation of a constitution in South Africa after the end of apartheid. “The long and distinguished career of Nathaniel Jones was based on a simple conviction: that the law must be an instrument that upholds the principles of equality and full citizenship for African Americans that undergird the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments to the Constitution,” said LDF President and Director-Counsel Sherrilyn Ifill. “He grew up in the segregated North, and by the time he was an adult had a clear-eyed understanding of racism in America, and the critical role of the law in challenging and dismantling the infrastructure of racial inequality. Whether he was arguing against school segregation before the Supreme Court, helping the people of South Africa draft a more equitable constitution, or presiding from the federal bench, he embodied the best of our profession.” Indeed, during his ten years as General Counsel for the NAACP, Mr.
  • Solving Social Crises by Commissions Normally Everthing Goes Well in Our World

    Solving Social Crises by Commissions Normally Everthing Goes Well in Our World

    Reich: Solving Social Crises by Commissions Normally everthing goes well in our world. But at night when we are sleeping, sometimes things go wrong. Army ants invade the camp; leopards may come in and steal a hunting dog or even a child. If we were awake these things would not happen. So when something big goes wrong, like illness or bad hunting or death, it must be because the forest is sleeping and not looking after its children. So what do we do? We wake it up. We wake it up by singing to it, and we do this because we want to awaken happy. Then everything will be well and good again. Colin Turnbull, The Forest People ''The report of the Commissionels," said Washington in his sixth address to Congress, 1'·"marks their Solving Social Crises firmness and abilities and must unite all virtuous men." The first commission to deal with a social crisis in America had by Commissions recommended that the President send troops into western Pennsylvania to end the Whiskey Rebellion. As a cartoon of the day put it, sending 15,000 troops into the Allegheny and Monongahela River valleys against a few farmers for the collection of such a small tax was like swatting flies with a meat axe. 2 But social order was at stake; and that commission, like the.scores of crisis commissions which were to follow it, provided the chief executive with a strategy for restoring the commonweal while assuring the public that the problem could, in fact, be handled. Whenever this nation experiences the kind of social crisis that challenges the capacity of its institutions to handle disorder, a commission of distinguished citizens is asked to probe the causes of the crisis and recommend solutions.
  • 2020 Annual Report

    2020 Annual Report

    Annual Report Letter from the President Boston Bar Association Boston Dear Members, Colleagues, and Friends: This year has been unlike any other, here in Boston, throughout the Commonwealth, and across the nation. In the legal community, we have experienced unprecedented disruption in our professional and personal lives, as well as a surge in need for legal representation for the most vulnerable among us. Throughout this turmoil, one thing at the BBA has remained constant: the dedication and commitment of our members. In response to the many challenges of 2020, our volunteers have stepped up to contribute their time and talents to our profession and our greater community: from engaging in professional development programming, to supporting the next generation of lawyers, to donating time and expertise to underserved clients and legal services organizations. Whether you participated in a virtual pro bono training, helped organize a webinar, attended a section or steering committee meeting, or signed into a virtual event, you have been a vital part of the success of this organization. Thanks to our 135+ sponsor institutions, 13,000+ members and countless community partners, the Boston Bar has been able to continue our critical work, even while working remotely: • We continued to be an innovative leader in professional excellence, hosting over 150 virtual programs since March and reaching nearly 6,000 people. • We remained passionate advocates, publishing critical reports, forming working groups and task forces, and drafting guides to assist pro se litigants in navigating virtual court proceedings. • We served the needs of our members in every stage of practice, from launching a new Law Firm Leadership Forum, to forming a series of virtual programs and events for law students.
  • Statement of Principles Concerning Immigration and Related Issues Boston Bar Association Statement of Principles Concerning Immigration and Related Issues

    Statement of Principles Concerning Immigration and Related Issues Boston Bar Association Statement of Principles Concerning Immigration and Related Issues

    Boston Bar Association Statement of Principles Concerning Immigration and Related Issues Boston Bar Association Statement of Principles Concerning Immigration and Related Issues EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction The Boston Bar Association (BBA) is a professional association of over 10,000 attorney members drawn from private practice, corporations, government agencies, legal services organizations, the courts, and law schools. Our mission is to facilitate access to justice, advance the highest standards of excellence for the legal profession, foster a diverse and inclusive professional community, and serve the community at large. As an Association, we have a long history of supporting civil rights and access to and the administration of justice. We believe that our profession has a unique responsibility to promote and uphold the rule of law as a fundamental principle of our nation’s democracy. The BBA recognizes the central—indeed, indispensable—role immigrants play in our city and state. It is in significant measure because of Massachusetts’ openness to immigrants that our educational, business, and healthcare institutions are recognized as global leaders. As a professional organization, the BBA is enhanced by the valuable contributions of our members and partners who are immigrants, and we affirm our commitment to standing with all immigrant communities in Boston and throughout Massachusetts. The BBA has long supported measures to uphold due process and equal protections rights and access to counsel for immigrants, and in recent months has spoken out against the “travel ban” that would limit immigration from several Muslim countries; condemned the practice of separation of immigrant families at the border; and opposed proposed changes to “public charge” regulations that would make it more difficult for immigrants to access essential benefits and services.