Alphabetical (PDF)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
United States Navy and World War I: 1914–1922
Cover: During World War I, convoys carried almost two million men to Europe. In this 1920 oil painting “A Fast Convoy” by Burnell Poole, the destroyer USS Allen (DD-66) is shown escorting USS Leviathan (SP-1326). Throughout the course of the war, Leviathan transported more than 98,000 troops. Naval History and Heritage Command 1 United States Navy and World War I: 1914–1922 Frank A. Blazich Jr., PhD Naval History and Heritage Command Introduction This document is intended to provide readers with a chronological progression of the activities of the United States Navy and its involvement with World War I as an outside observer, active participant, and victor engaged in the war’s lingering effects in the postwar period. The document is not a comprehensive timeline of every action, policy decision, or ship movement. What is provided is a glimpse into how the 20th century’s first global conflict influenced the Navy and its evolution throughout the conflict and the immediate aftermath. The source base is predominately composed of the published records of the Navy and the primary materials gathered under the supervision of Captain Dudley Knox in the Historical Section in the Office of Naval Records and Library. A thorough chronology remains to be written on the Navy’s actions in regard to World War I. The nationality of all vessels, unless otherwise listed, is the United States. All errors and omissions are solely those of the author. Table of Contents 1914..................................................................................................................................................1 -
Dredging and Disposal Plan
DREDGING AND DISPOSAL PLAN PORT OF OLYMPIA MARINE BERTHS 2 & 3 INTERIM ACTION DREDGING Contract No.: 2008-0011 Project No. MT0601 Submitted To: Port of Olympia Attn: Rick Anderson 915 Washington Street NE Olympia, WA TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 Dredging ..................................................................................................................... 1 Trans-loading ............................................................................................................. 1 Material Barge ............................................................................................................ 2 Dredge Bucket ............................................................................................................ 3 Dredge Sediment Disposal ........................................................................................ 3 Working Hours .......................................................................................................... 3 Position & Progress Surveys .................................................................................... 3 Dredge Navigation ...................................................................................................... 4 Survey Boat ................................................................................................................ 4 Water Quality BMP’s ................................................................................................ -
Alternative Naval Force Structure
Alternative Naval Force Structure A compendium by CIMSEC Articles By Steve Wills · Javier Gonzalez · Tom Meyer · Bob Hein · Eric Beaty Chuck Hill · Jan Musil · Wayne P. Hughes Jr. Edited By Dmitry Filipoff · David Van Dyk · John Stryker 1 Contents Preface ................................................................................................................................ 3 The Perils of Alternative Force Structure ................................................... 4 By Steve Wills UnmannedCentric Force Structure ............................................................... 8 By Javier Gonzalez Proposing A Modern High Speed Transport – The Long Range Patrol Vessel ................................................................................................... 11 By Tom Meyer No Time To Spare: Drawing on History to Inspire Capability Innovation in Today’s Navy ................................................................................. 15 By Bob Hein Enhancing Existing Force Structure by Optimizing Maritime Service Specialization .............................................................................................. 18 By Eric Beaty Augment Naval Force Structure By Upgunning The Coast Guard .......................................................................................................... 21 By Chuck Hill A Fleet Plan for 2045: The Navy the U.S. Ought to be Building ..... 25 By Jan Musil Closing Remarks on Changing Naval Force Structure ....................... 31 By Wayne P. Hughes Jr. CIMSEC 22 www.cimsec.org -
1502-1629 THOUGH It Did Not Take Place Until Fifteen Years Later, the Discovery of St
CHAPTER I 1502-1629 THOUGH it did not take place until fifteen years later, the discovery of St. Helena became inevitable AL when the Portuguese navigator, Bartholomew de Diaz, rounded the Cape of Good Hope in 1487. For many years the Portuguese, the greatest race of sailors who ever ventured into uncharted seas, excluded from the Mediterranean, had gradually explored farther and farther along the mysterious unmapped western coast of Africa. Ten years after the epoch-making discovery of Diaz and after Columbus and Cabot had opened up the Atlantic to the races of the West and North of Europe, the King of Portugal, Emmanuel the Fortunate, sent out a fleet under the command of Vasco da Gama with orders to sail beyond the Cape of Good Hope in search of a direct sea route to India and thus tap the wealth of the East. Hitherto for centuries all trade between Europe and the East had been carried overland across Arabia, and by ship along the Mediterranean, and had been in the hands of the Italian cities of Venice and Genoa. Da Gama achieved his ambition, and arrived at Calicut, on the west coast of the Indian Peninsula, and from that day the Mediterranean, which for centuries had been the centre of civilization, began to decline. The Portuguese lost no time in building forts and setting up trading posts along the west coast of India, but their principal one was at Calicut. I 5 021 ST. HELENA ST. HELENA [1502 It is not to be wondered at that the "Moors" or Arabs who by some strange fluke of fortune, is still existing and to be for centuries had held the monopoly of the trade between found in considerable numbers. -
Annex 10 PDF Page Vanderlaan, ASM, Taggart, CT, Serdynska, AR
Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) Annex 10 PDF Page Vanderlaan, A.S.M., Taggart, C.T., Serdynska, A.R., Kenney, R.D., and Brown, M.W. 2008. 2 Reducing the risk of lethal encounters: vessels and right whales in the Bay of Fundy and on the Scotian Shelf. Endang. Spec. Res. 4:283–297. Veirs, S., Veirs, V., and Wood, J.D. 2016. Ship noise extends to frequencies used for 17 echolocation by endangered killer whales. PeerJ, 4, p.e1657. Yang, Z., Hollebone, B.P., Zhang, G., Brown, C.E., Yang, C., Lambert, P., Wang, Z., 53 Landriault, M., and Shah, K. 2017. Fate of Photodegraded Diluted Bitumen in Seawater, Proceedings of the 2017 International Oil Spill Conference, American Petroleum Institute, Washington, D.C., pp. 2286-2305. Yang, Z., Zhang, G., Hollebone, B.P., Brown, C.E., Yang, C., Lambert, P., Landriault, M., 73 and Shah, K. 2017. Fate of Oxygenated Components for Solar Irradiated Diluted Bitumen in Saltwater, Proceedings of the Fortieth AMOP Technical Seminar on Environmental Contamination and Response, pp. 415-440, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa, ON. Yang, Z., Zhang, G., Hollebone, B.P., Brown, C.E., Yang, C., Lambert, P., Wang, Z., 99 Landriault, M., and Shah, K. 2017. Fate of Oxygenated Components for Solar Irradiated Diluted Bitumen Mixed with Seawater, Environmental Pollution, Vol. 231, pp. 622-634, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.043. Yergeau, E., Maynard, C., Sanschagrin, S., Champagne, J., Juck, D., Lee, K., and Greer, C. 112 2015. Microbial Community Composition, Functions, and Activities in the Gulf of Mexico 1 Year after the Deepwater Horizon Accident. -
NCITEC National Center for Intermodal Transportation for Economic Competitiveness
National Center for Intermodal Transportation for Economic Competitiveness Final Report 525 The Impact of Modifying the Jones Act on US Coastal Shipping by Asaf Ashar James R. Amdal UNO Department of Planning and Urban Studies NCITEC National Center for Intermodal Transportation for Economic Competitiveness Supported by: 4101 Gourrier Avenue | Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808 | (225) 767-9131 | www.ltrc.lsu.edu TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/LA.525 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date The Impact of Modifying the Jones Act on US Coastal June 2014 Shipping 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Asaf Ashar, Professor Research, UNOTI LTRC Project Number: 13-8SS James R. Amdal, Sr. Research Associate, UNOTI State Project Number: 30000766 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. University of New Orleans Department of Planning and Urban Studies 11. Contract or Grant No. 368 Milneburg Hall, 2000 Lakeshore Dr. New Orleans, LA 70148 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Louisiana Department of Transportation and Final Report Development July 2012 – December 2013 P.O. Box 94245 Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9245 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Conducted in Cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA), Federal Highway Administration 16. Abstract The study assesses exempt coastal shipping defined as exempted from the US-built stipulation of the Jones Act, operating with functional crews and exempted from Harbor Maintenance Tax (HMT). The study focuses on two research questions: (a) the impact of the US-built exemption on the cost of coastal shipping; and (b) the competitiveness of exempt services. -
CLIPPER 021799 Asset Fact Sheets MARKETING
CLIPPER SEAL TS (BP) CA TEESSIDE CUTTER SOLE PIT CARRACK BARQUE GALLEON SHAMROCK CARAVEL EASINGTON CLIPPER BRIGANTINE CLIPPER SKIFF STANLOW INDE AMELAND INDE FIELD CORVETTE SEAN GRIJPSKERK SEAN FIELD LEMAN BACTON BBL DEN HELDER GREAT YARMOUTH BALGZAND INTERCONNECTOR EMMEN THE HAGUE SCHIEDAM LONDON CLIPPER ZEEBRUGGE CLIPPER Clipper is in the Southern part of the UK sector of the North Sea in the Sole Pit field. Located 113km (70 miles) north north east of Lowestoft, 73km (46 miles) from Bacton and 66km (41 miles) from the nearest point of the Norfolk coast. It is a Normally Attended Installation (NAI) comprising five fixed bridge linked platforms Clipper PW Wellhead Platform Clipper PT Production Platform - which is manned Clipper PC Compression Platform Clipper PM Metering / Compression Platform Clipper PR Riser Platform The Clipper installation produces and processes natural gas from its own wells and imports and processes gas from Barque PB & PL, Galleon PN & PG, Skiff PS, Cutter QC and Carrack QA. KEY FACTS Block 48/19a Sector Southern North Sea Approx distance to land 109km (68 miles) North of Lowestoft Water Depth 112ft (34m) Hydrocarbons Produced Gas Export Method Gas piped to Bacton Gas Terminal Operated / Non-Operated Operated Graphics, Media & Publication Services (Aberdeen) ITV/UZDC : Ref. 021799 January 2016 CLIPPER INFRASTRUCTURE INFORMATION Entry Specification: GSV 37-44.5MJ/sm3, Oxygen <0.2%, CO2 Max 2 mol%, H2S <3.3ppm, Total Sulphur <15ppm, WI 48-51.5 MJ/Sm3, Inerts <7%, N2 <5% Outline details of Primary separation processing -
World War I Context Follow up in 1915, Europe Was Embroiled in U.S
1915: World War I Context Follow Up In 1915, Europe was embroiled in U.S. newspapers aroused outrage war, but U.S. public sentiment op- against Germany for ruthlessly kill- posed involvement. President ing defenceless Americans. The U.S. Woodrow Wilson said they would was being drawn into the war. In “remain neutral in fact as well as in June 1916, Congress increased the name.”23 size of the army. In September, Con- gress allocated $7 billion for national Pretext Incident defense, “the largest sum appropri- On May 7, 1915, a German subma- ated to that time.”30 rine (U-boat) sank the Lusitania, a In January 1917, the British British passenger ship killing 1,198, said they had intercepted a German including 128 Americans.24 message to Mexico seeking an alli- The public was not told that ance with Germany and offering to passengers were, in effect, a ‘human help Mexico recover land ceded to shield’ protecting six million rounds the U.S. On April 2, Wilson told of U.S. ammunition bound for Brit- Congress: “The world must be safe ain.25 To Germany, the ship was a for democracy.” Four days later the threat. To Britain, it was bait for lur- U.S. declared war on Germany.31 ing an attack. Why? A week before the attack, Real Reasons British Admiralty leader, Winston The maneuvre which brings Influential British military, political Churchill wrote to the Board of an ally into the field is as and business interests wanted U.S. Trade’s president saying it is “most serviceable as that which help in their war with Germany. -
May 2018 Pendennis U-Boats Site Report
Forgotten Wrecks Pendennis U-boats of the First World War Site Report May 2018 Table of Contents i Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................ 3 ii Copyright Statement ........................................................................................................................ 3 iii List of Figures .................................................................................................................................. 3 1. Project Background ............................................................................................................................. 5 2. Methodology ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Desk Based Research .................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Online Information/Sources .................................................................................................. 5 2.1.2 Records at The National Archives .......................................................................................... 6 2.1.3 Other Historical Sources ........................................................................................................ 6 2.2 Associated Artefacts ..................................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Fieldwork ...................................................................................................................................... -
Spanish National Action Framework for Alternative Energy in Transport
INTERMINISTERIAL GROUP FOR GOVERNMENT COORDINATION OF THE NATIONAL ACTION FRAMEWORK FOR OF SPAIN ALTERNATIVE ENERGY IN TRANSPORT NATIONAL ACTION FRAMEWORK FOR ALTERNATIVE ENERGY IN TRANSPORT MARKET DEVELOPMENT AND DEPLOYMENT OF ALTERNATIVE FUELS INFRASTRUCTURE. IN COMPLIANCE WITH DIRECTIVE 2014/94/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL, OF 22 OCTOBER 2014. 14 OCTOBER 2016 COORDINATED BY SECRETARIAT-GENERAL FOR INDUSTRY AND SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES PRESIDENCY OF THE INTERMINISTERIAL GROUP INTERMINISTERIAL GROUP FOR GOVERNMENT COORDINATION OF THE NATIONAL ACTION FRAMEWORK FOR OF SPAIN ALTERNATIVE ENERGY IN TRANSPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 9 I.1. PRESENTATION OF DIRECTIVE 2014/94/EU......................................... 9 I.2. BACKGROUND.................................................................................... 10 I.3. PREPARATION OF THE NATIONAL ACTION FRAMEWORK......................... 13 II. ALTERNATIVE ENERGY IN THE TRANSPORT SECTOR............................................. 17 II.1. NATURAL GAS.................................................................................... 17 II.2. ELECTRICITY..................................................................................... 21 II.3. LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS.............................................................. 23 II.4. HYDROGEN………………………………………..…………................. 26 II.5. BIOFUELS…………………………………………….………………….. 28 III. ROAD TRANSPORT…………………………………………..………..……………. -
Naval Postgraduate School Thesis
NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS A STUDY OF THE RUSSIAN ACQUISITION OF THE FRENCH MISTRAL AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT WARSHIPS by Patrick Thomas Baker June 2011 Thesis Advisor: Mikhail Tsypkin Second Reader: Douglas Porch Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2011 Master‘s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS A Study of the Russian Acquisition of the French Mistral Amphibious Assault Warships 6. AUTHOR(S) Patrick Thomas Baker 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S. -
Appendix I War of 1812 Chronology
THE WAR OF 1812 MAGAZINE ISSUE 26 December 2016 Appendix I War of 1812 Chronology Compiled by Ralph Eshelman and Donald Hickey Introduction This War of 1812 Chronology includes all the major events related to the conflict beginning with the 1797 Jay Treaty of amity, commerce, and navigation between the United Kingdom and the United States of America and ending with the United States, Weas and Kickapoos signing of a peace treaty at Fort Harrison, Indiana, June 4, 1816. While the chronology includes items such as treaties, embargos and political events, the focus is on military engagements, both land and sea. It is believed this chronology is the most holistic inventory of War of 1812 military engagements ever assembled into a chronological listing. Don Hickey, in his War of 1812 Chronology, comments that chronologies are marred by errors partly because they draw on faulty sources and because secondary and even primary sources are not always dependable.1 For example, opposing commanders might give different dates for a military action, and occasionally the same commander might even present conflicting data. Jerry Roberts in his book on the British raid on Essex, Connecticut, points out that in a copy of Captain Coot’s report in the Admiralty and Secretariat Papers the date given for the raid is off by one day.2 Similarly, during the bombardment of Fort McHenry a British bomb vessel's log entry date is off by one day.3 Hickey points out that reports compiled by officers at sea or in remote parts of the theaters of war seem to be especially prone to ambiguity and error.