DOCSLIB.ORG

TEKAPO POWER SCHEME 01.07.11 // 30.06.12 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT // ENVIRONMENTAL Reports Ordiscuss Matters Directly Withinterested Parties

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

POWER SCHEME POWER TEKAPO ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT // 01.07.11 // 30.06.12 2 1 This report summarises the key outcomes at the Tekapo Power Scheme for the operating period 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012. There are a number of technical reports, research programmes, environmental initiatives and agreements that have fed into this report; it is not the intention of this report to reproduce or replicate this information, rather to provide a summary of it. Genesis Energy is happy to provide further details or technical reports or discuss matters directly with interested parties. HIGHLIGHTS 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 02 01 INTRODUCTION 02 1.1 Document Overview Transfer of Tekapo Power Scheme On 1 June 2011 02 1.2 Resource Consent Overview Genesis Energy took ownership of the Tekapo Power 02 1.3 How to use this document Scheme including all resource consents and stakeholder 02 1.4 Genesis Energy’s Approach agreements for the scheme. The first year of ownership to Environmental Management for Genesis Energy has been very busy. Genesis Energy 02 1.4.1 Genesis Energy’s Values replaced the control interface from the previous owner’s 03 1.4.2 Environmental Management System control centre into Genesis Energy’s Renewable Energy 03 1.4.3 Resource Consents Management System Control Centre, upgraded the communications and 03 1.4.4 Hydrology installed fibre optic cable to ensure full control and 03 1.5 Feedback operation of the Tekapo Power Scheme back to the North 04 02 TEKAPO POWER SCHEME Island. The scheme is operated by Genesis Energy’s 05 2.1 Operating the Tekapo Power Scheme Renewable Energy Control Centre located at Tokaanu 05 2.2 Climate and Power Generation Power Station, near Turangi at the southern end of Lake Taupo. Design and consenting for the Tekapo Canal 06 03 LAKE TEKAPO Remediation Project has also occurred. 07 3.1 Hydrology 07 3.2 Environmental Monitoring Schoolgen Schoolgen is a Genesis Energy initiative 08 04 TEKAPO RIVER AND LAKE GEORGE SCOTT bringing solar energy and energy efficiency to life for 09 4.1 Hydrology New Zealand schools. Three Christchurch schools were 10 4.2 Environmental Monitoring offered the opportunity to become Schoolgen schools. 10 4.3 Recreational Releases In March 2012 Lake Tekapo School was also offered this opportunity with the additional special offer of a battery 12 05 TEKAPO A POWER STATION, TEKAPO CANAL AND pack to store power generated from installed solar panels TEKAPO B POWER STATION (section 8.1). 13 5.1 Hydrology 14 5.2 Water Management Agreement Aoraki Bound On 22 December 2011 Genesis Energy 14 5.2.1 Genesis Energy and Meridian Energy signed a 50-50 partnership with Bank of New Zealand Water Management Agreement to support Aoraki Bound, a leadership programme 14 5.2.2 The Pukaki Supply Flow developed by Ngãi Tahu (section 8.2). 14 5.2.3 High Flow Management Coordination Group 15 06 TEKAPO CANAL REMEDIATION PROJECT Whio (Blue Duck) 1 March 2012 marked the beginning of a 16 6.1 Overview relationship between Genesis Energy and the Department 16 6.2 Resource Consent of Conservation to provide funding for the protection 16 6.3 Stakeholder Consultation for Tekapo Canal and enhancement of Whio (Blue Duck) and Whio habitat Remediation Works (section 8.3). 17 07 SCHEME-WIDE OUTCOMES Tekapo Canal Remediation Project Genesis Energy began 18 7.1 Project River Recover - Department of Conservation preparations for remediation works on the Tekapo Canal 18 7.2 Lake Alexandrina Fishery Enhancement Project to fix known defects and to bring the Canal up to modern - Fish and Game building and seismic standards. Stakeholder consultation 19 7.3 Maintenance Activities began and resource consent applications were submitted 19 7.3.1 Oil Interceptor Inspections during the reporting period (section 6). 19 7.3.2 Clearance of Iron From Upper Tekapo River 19 7.3.3 Lake Tekapo Water Level Site 20 7.3.4 Maintenance of Irishman Creek Culvert ABBREVIATIONS 20 7.3.5 Installation of Deer Fence AER Annual Environmental Report 20 7.4 Dam Safety CSR Comprehensive Safety Review 20 7.5 Oil Spill Response DOC Department of Conservation 21 7.6 Safety Signage Project EMS Environmental Management System 21 7.7 Public Complaints GWh Gigawatt hour 21 7.8 Publically Available Hydrology Information HiCoG High Flow Management Coordination Group kW Kilowatt 22 08 COMMUNITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES masl Metres above sea level – Moturiki Datum 23 8.1 Schoolgen MW Megawatt 23 8.2 Aoraki Bound - Ngãi Tahu NIWA National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research 24 8.3 National Whio Recovery Project PRR Project River Recovery 25 8.4 Curtain Bank PV Photovoltaic RCMS Resource Consent Management System 26 09 KEY OBJECTIVES RECC Renewable Energy Control Centre 27 9.1 Key Objectives TekPS Tekapo Power Scheme WMA Water Management Agreement 28 10 REFERENCES Cover photo: View of Lake Tekapo and the Intake Structure. 01 INTRODUCTION This AER bridges the gap between site specific reporting and the company’s Annual Report. It provides an overview of all environmental E mihi ana ki a koutou i runga i ngã tini ãhuatanga o te wã. Anei te and stakeholder activities relating to the TekPS. It does not overview Ripoata Taiao e hãngai ana ki ngã mahi hihiko mõ te rohe o Takapõ. company strategy or performance (refer to the Annual Report for this information) or provide extensive detailed information on monitoring Welcome to the 2012 Annual Environmental Report (AER) for the programmes and other initiatives undertaken. Tekapo Power Scheme (TekPS). The purpose of this report is to update the community and stakeholders on the wide range of activities that More information about Genesis Energy, including an electronic occurred at TekPS between 1 July 2011 and 30 June 2012. copy of this document, can be found on the website www.genesisenergy.co.nz TekPS was purchased by Genesis Energy on 1 June 2011 as a result of government reforms enabled under the Electricity Act 1.2 RESOURCE CONSENT OVERVIEW 2010. On this date the ownership and management of the Tekapo assets (Tekapo A and B Power Stations, the Tekapo Canal and Resource consents for the ongoing operation of TekPS were related infrastructure) were transferred to Genesis Energy from split or transferred to Genesis Energy on 1 June 2011 as part Meridian Energy. On this date, all rights and obligations under of the Sale and Purchase Agreement between Genesis Energy resource consents and stakeholder agreements in regard to TekPS and Meridian Energy. Obligations under these consents remain were transferred to Genesis Energy in full. unchanged. The only modifications were those required to make Genesis Energy the consent holder for those consents related to A Hydrology Resource Consents Compliance Report for the period the TekPS. 1 June – 30 June 2011 was produced to report on compliance for the duration of Genesis Energy’s ownership and management in The resource consents for TekPS are regulated by Mackenzie the 2010/11 compliance reporting period, year ending 30 June. The District Council and Environment Canterbury. They include a Compliance Report 2010-2011 can be found on the Genesis Energy range of water permits, land use and discharge permits to take website www.genesisenergy.co.nz. and use water from Lake Tekapo throughout TekPS and to allow for minor maintenance works around the scheme. The consents This document is the first AER for the TekPS and reports on the are operative until 2025. period 1 July 2011 – 30 June 2012 (the ‘reporting period’). 1.3 HOW TO USE THIS DOCUMENT This report will: This report documents environmental outcomes based on three provide an overview of resource consent compliance at TekPS; key areas of the scheme: provide an update on monitoring and research programmes; report back on key projects; Lake Tekapo; report on community and environmental initiatives; and Tekapo River and Lake George Scott; and define environmental objectives for the next 12 months. Tekapo A Power Station, Tekapo Canal and Tekapo B Power Station. Genesis Energy aims to be accessible to the public, to address issues as they arise and to develop closer working relationships This report also provides non-geographical information for: within the communities in which it operates. Scheme-wide Outcomes; 1.1 DOCUMENT OVERVIEW Community and Environmental Initiatives. Genesis Energy produces a suite of reports and other Bold text like this will help you to find your way around the report. documentation on its activities each year (Figure 1). These include detailed technical reports, audit reports and various reporting Consent # (condition) identifies the parts of the report that relate requirements to stakeholders. to specific resource consent conditions. The Company’s Annual Report provides an overview of Genesis Orange text like this throughout the report provides useful Energy’s performance as a company and sets objectives for the background information on specific issues. coming year. 1.4 GENESIS ENERGY’S APPROACH TO ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 1.4.1 GENESIS ENERGY’S VALUES Genesis Energy’s four core values define the way things are done at Genesis Energy. They are the actions and behaviours which help contribute to the success of the company (Figure 2). // 12 FIGURE 1 // Report hierarchy at Genesis Energy. TEKAPO FIGURE 2 // Genesis Energy Values. 04 Genesis Energy’s intent is to become the leading energy company The purpose of the RCMS is to ensure that Genesis Energy in New Zealand. We will achieve this by: manages its statutory and stakeholder obligations effectively and that essential requirements are not overlooked. Providing differentiated service to our customers; Optimising the performance of our value chain; 1.4.4 HYDROLOGY Being innovative and designing solutions with our people, our customers and our stakeholders/partners; Genesis Energy has an extensive hydrology monitoring network ‘Living’ our values; and around TekPS.
Recommended publications
  • The Wrybill <I>Anarhynchus Frontalis</I>: a Brief Review of Status, Threats and Work in Progress

    The Wrybill <I>Anarhynchus Frontalis</I>: a Brief Review of Status, Threats and Work in Progress

    The Wrybill Anarhynchus frontalis: a brief review of status, threats and work in progress ADRIAN C. RIEGEN '1 & JOHN E. DOWDING 2 •231 ForestHill Road, Waiatarua, Auckland 8, NewZealand, e-maih riegen @xtra.co. nz; 2p.o. BOX36-274, Merivale, Christchurch 8030, New Zealand, e-maih [email protected]. nz Riegen,A.C. & Dowding, J.E. 2003. The Wrybill Anarhynchusfrontalis:a brief review of status,threats and work in progress.Wader Study Group Bull. 100: 20-24. The Wrybill is a threatenedplover endemic to New Zealandand unique in havinga bill curvedto the right.It is specializedfor breedingon bareshingle in thebraided riverbeds of Canterburyand Otago in the SouthIsland. After breeding,almost the entirepopulation migrates north and wintersin the harboursaround Auckland. The speciesis classifiedas Vulnerable. Based on countsof winteringflocks, the population currently appears to number4,500-5,000 individuals.However, countingproblems mean that trendsare difficult to determine. The mainthreats to theWrybill arebelieved to be predationon thebreeding grounds, degradation of breeding habitat,and floodingof nests.In a recentstudy in the MackenzieBasin, predation by introducedmammals (mainly stoats,cats and possibly ferrets) had a substantialimpact on Wrybill survivaland productivity. Prey- switchingby predatorsfollowing the introductionof rabbithaemorrhagic disease in 1997 probablyincreased predationrates on breedingwaders. A recentstudy of stoatsin the TasmanRiver showedthat 11% of stoat densexamined contained Wrybill remains.Breeding habitat is beinglost in somerivers and degraded in oth- ers,mainly by waterabstraction and flow manipulation,invasion of weeds,and human recreational use. Flood- ing causessome loss of nestsbut is alsobeneficial, keeping nesting areas weed-free. The breedingrange of the speciesappears to be contractingand fragmenting, with the bulk of the popula- tion now breedingin three large catchments.
  • NIWA Lake Benmore Model Assessment Nutrient Load Effects

    NIWA Lake Benmore Model Assessment Nutrient Load Effects

    Updated model assessment of the effects of increased nutrient loads into Lake Benmore Prepared for Environment Canterbury August 2015 Prepared by : Bob Spigel (NIWA) David Plew (NIWA) David Hamilton (University of Waikato) Donna Sutherland (NIWA) Clive Howard-Williams (NIWA) For any information regarding this report please contact: Bob Spigel Scientist Hydrodynamics +64-3-343 8020 [email protected] National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd PO Box 8602 Riccarton Christchurch 8011 Phone +64 3 348 8987 NIWA CLIENT REPORT No: CHC2015-089 Report date: August 2015 NIWA Project: ENC14506 Quality Assurance Statement Reviewed by: Sandy Elliot Approved for release John Quinn by: Ohau C Canal inflow entering Haldon Arm, Lake Benmore. [Donna Sutherland, NIWA] © All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced or copied in any form without the permission of the copyright owner(s). Such permission is only to be given in accordance with the terms of the client’s contract with NIWA. This copyright extends to all forms of copying and any storage of material in any kind of information retrieval system. Whilst NIWA has used all reasonable endeavours to ensure that the information contained in this document is accurate, NIWA does not give any express or implied warranty as to the completeness of the information contained herein, or that it will be suitable for any purpose(s) other than those specifically contemplated during the Project or agreed by NIWA and the Client. Contents Extended summary ............................................................................................................
  • Project River Recovery Bibliography

    Project River Recovery Bibliography

    Project River Recovery bibliography 1991–July 2007 CANTERBURY SERIES 0208 Project River Recovery bibliography 1991 – JULY 2007 Project River Recovery Report 2007/02 Susan Anderson Department of Conservation, Private Bag, Twizel July 2007 Docdm-171819 - PRR Bibliography 2 INTRODUCTION Since its inception in 1991, Project River Recovery has undertaken or funded numerous research projects. The results of these investigations have been reported in various reports, theses, Department of Conservation publications, and scientific papers. Results of all significant research have been published, can be found through literature searches, and are widely available. Internal reports that do not warrant publication are held at the Twizel Te Manahuna Area Office and at the main Department of Conservation library in Wellington. All unpublished Project River Recovery reports produced since 1998 have been assigned report numbers. In addition to reports on original research, Project River Recovery has produced magazine articles and newspaper feature articles, various annual reports, progress reports, discussion documents, and plans. It has also commissioned some reports from consultants. This bibliography updates the bibliography compiled in 2000 (Sanders 2000) and lists all reports, theses, diplomas, Department of Conservation publications, and scientific papers that were produced or supported by Project River Recovery between 1991 and July 2007. It does not list brochures, posters, fact sheets, newsletters, abstracts for conference programmes, or minor magazine or newspaper articles. Docdm-171819 - PRR Bibliography 3 BIBLIOGRAPHY Adams, L.K. 1995: Reintroduction of juvenile black stilts to the wild. Unpublished MSc thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch. 108 p. Anderson, S.J. 2006: Proposal for black-fronted tern nest monitoring and predator trapping at the Ruataniwha Wetlands: 2006-2007 breeding season.
  • Alternative Route to Twizel

    Alternative Route to Twizel

    AORAKI/MT COOK WHITE HORSE HILL CAMPGROUND MOUNT COOK VILLAGE BURNETT MOUNTAINS MOUNT COOK AIRPORT TASMAN POINT Tasman Valley Track FRED’S STREAM TASMAN RIVER JOLLIE RIVER SH80 Jollie Carpark Braemar-Mount Cook Station Rd GLENTANNER PARK CENTRE LAKE PUKAKI LAKE TEKAPO 54KM LANDSLIP CREEK ALTERNATIVE ROUTE TO TWIZEL TAKAPÕ LAKE TEKAPO MT JOHN OBSERVATORY BRAEMAR ROAD TAKAPŌ/LAKE TEKAPO Tekapo Powerhouse Rd TEKAPO A POWER STATION SH8 3km Hayman Rd Tekapo Canal Rd PATTERSONS PONDS TEKAPO CANAL 9km 15km 24km Tekapo Canal Rd LAKE PUKAKI SALMON FARM TEKAPO RIVER TEKAPO B POWER STATION Hayman Road 30km Lakeside Dr TAKAPŌ/LAKE TEKAPO 35km Tek Church of the apo-Twizel Rd Good Shepherd 8 MARY RANGES Dog Monument SALMONFA RM TO SALMON SHOP SH80 TEKAPO RIVER SH8 r s D 44km e r r C e i e Pi g n on SALMON SHOP n Roto Pl o RUATANIWHA i e a e P r r D CONSERVATION PARK o r A Scott Pond STARTING POINT PUKAKI CANAL SH8 Aorangi Cres 8 8 F Rd Lakeside airlie kapo -Te Car Park PUKAKI RIVER Lochinvar Ave Allan St Lilybank Rd Glen Lyon Rd r D n o P l Glen Lyon Rd ilt ollock P Andrew Don Dr am Old Glen Lyon Rd H N Pukaki Flats Track Rise TWIZEL 54km Murray Pl Rankin PUKAKI FLATS OHAU CANAL LAKE RUATANIWHA SH8KEY: Fitness Easy Traffic Low 800 TEKAPO TWIZEL Onroad left onto Hayman Rd and ride to the Off-road trail 700 start of the off-road Trail on your right Skill Easy Grade 2 Information Centre 35km which follows the Lake Pukaki 600 Picnic Area shoreline.
  • South Canterbury Artists a Retrospective View 3 February — 11 March, 1990

    South Canterbury Artists a Retrospective View 3 February — 11 March, 1990

    v)ileewz cmlnd IO_FFIGIL PROJEEGT South Canterbury Artists A Retrospective View 3 February — 11 March, 1990 Aigantighe Art Gallery In association with South Canterbury Arts Society 759. 993 17 SOU CONTENTS Page LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS 3 INTRODUCTION 6 BIOGRAPHIES Early South Canterbury Artists 9 South Canterbury Arts Society 1895—1928 18 South Canterbury Arts Society formed 1953 23 South Canterbury Arts Society Present 29 Printmakers 36 Contemporaries 44 CATALOGUE OF WORKS 62 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Page S.C. Arts Society Exhibition 1910 S.C. Arts and Crafts Exhibition 1946 T.S. Cousins Interior cat. I10. 7 11 Rev. J.H. Preston Entrance to Orari Gorge cat. I10. 14 13 Capt. E.F. Temple Hanging Rock cat. 1'10. 25 14 R.M. Waitt Te Weka Street cat. no. 28 15 F.F. Huddlestone Opawa near Albury cat. no. 33 16 A.L. Haylock Wreck of Benvenue and City of Perth cat. no. 35 17 W. Ferrier Caroline Bay cat. no. 36 18 W. Greene The Roadmakers cat. 1'10. 39 2o C.H.T. Sterndale Beech Trees Autumn cat. no. 41 22 D. Darroch Pamir cat. no. 45 24 A.J. Rae Mt Sefton from Mueller Hut cat. no. 7O 36 A.H. McLintock Low Tide Limehouse cat. no. 71 37 B. Cleavin Prime Specimens 1989 cat. no. 73 39 D. Copland Tree of the Mind 1987 cat. 1'10. 74 40 G. Forster Our Land VII 1989 cat. no. 75 42 J. Greig Untitled cat. no. 76 43 A. Deans Back Country Road 1986 cat. no. 77 44 Farrier J.
  • Lake Tekapo to Twizel Highlights

    Lake Tekapo to Twizel Highlights

    AORAKI/MT COOK WHITE HORSE HILL CAMPGROUND MOUNT COOK VILLAGE BURNETT MOUNTAINS MOUNT COOK AIRPORT TASMAN POINT Tasman Valley Track FRED’S STREAM TASMAN RIVER JOLLIE RIVER SH80 Jollie Carpark Braemar-Mount Cook Station Rd 800 TEKAPO TWIZEL 700 54km ALTERNATIVEGLENTANNER PARK CENTRE ROUTE: Lake Tekapo to Twizel 600 LANDSLIP CREEK ELEVATION Fitness: Easy • Skill: Easy • Traffic: Low • Grade: 2 500 400 KM LAKE PUKAKI 0 10 20 30 40 50 MT JOHN OBSERVATORY LAKE TEKAPO BRAEMAR ROAD Tekapo Powerhouse Rd LAKE TEKAPO TEKAPO A POWER STATION SH8 3km TRAIL GUARDIAN Hayman Rd SALMON FARM TO SALMON SHOP Tekapo Canal Rd PATTERSONS PONDS 9km TEKAPO CANAL 15km Tekapo Canal Rd LAKE PUKAKI SALMON FARM 24km TEKAPO RIVER TEKAPO B POWER STATION Hayman Road LAKE TEKAPO 30km Lakeside Dr Te kapo-Twizel Rd Church of the 8 Good Shepherd Dog Monument MARY RANGES SH80 35km r s D TEKAPO RIVERe SH8 r r 44km C e i e Pi g n on n Roto Pl o i e a e P SALMON SHOP r r D o r A Scott Pond Aorangi Cres 8 PUKAKI CANAL SH8 F Rd airlie-Tekapo PUKAKI RIVER Allan St Glen Lyon Rd Glen Lyon Rd LAKE TEKAPO Andrew Don Dr Old Glen Lyon Rd Pukaki Flats Track Murray Pl TWIZEL PUKAKI FLATS Mapwww.alps2ocean.com current as of 28/7/17 N 54km OHAU CANAL LAKE RUATANIWHA 0 1 2 3 4 5km KEY: Onroad Off-road trail SH8 Scale The alternative route begins in the at the Mt Cook Alpine Salmon shop 44km . You then cross the Tekapo township near the police highway and follow the trail across Pukaki Flats – an expansive Highlights: station.
  • TS2-V6.0 11-Aoraki

    TS2-V6.0 11-Aoraki

    Aoraki Mackenzie International Dark Sky Reserve, New Zealand Margaret Austin, John Hearnshaw and Alison Loveridge 1. Identification of the property 1.a Country/State Party: New Zealand 1.b State/Province/Region: Canterbury Region, Te Manahuna / Mackenzie Basin 1.c Name: Aoraki Mackenzie International Dark Sky Reserve 1.d Location The geographical co-ordinates for the two core sites are: • Mt John University Observatory near Tekapo: latitude 43° 59′ 08″ S, longitude 170° 27′ 54″ E, elevation 1030m above MSL. • Mt Cook Airport and including the White Horse Hill Camping Ground near Aoraki/Mt Cook village: latitude 43° 46′ 01″ S, longitude 170° 07′ 59″ E, elevation 650m above MSL. Fig. 11.1. Location of the property in New Zealand South Island. Satellite photograph showing the locations of Lake Tekapo (A) and the Aoraki/Mt Cook National Park (B). Source: Google Earth 232 Heritage Sites of Astronomy and Archaeoastronomy 1.e Maps and Plans See Figs. 11.2, 11.3 and 11.4. Fig. 11.2. Topographic map showing the primary core boundary defined by the 800m contour line Fig. 11.3. Map showing the boundaries of the secondary core at Mt Cook Airport. The boun- daries are clearly defined by State Highway 80, Tasman Valley Rd, and Mt Cook National Park’s southern boundary Aoraki Mackenzie International Dark Sky Reserve 233 Fig. 11.4. Map showing the boundaries of the secondary core at Mt Cook Airport. The boundaries are clearly defined by State Highway 80, Tasman Valley Rd, and Mt Cook National Park’s southern boundary 234 Heritage Sites of Astronomy and Archaeoastronomy 1.f Area of the property Aoraki Mackenzie International Dark Sky Reserve is located in the centre of the South Island of New Zealand, in the Canterbury Region, in the place known as Te Manahuna or the Mackenzie Basin (see Fig.
  • Project River Recovery After 25 Years

    Project River Recovery After 25 Years

    Project River Recovery after 25 years BRaid, 31 May 2016 Aalbert Rebergen What has changed? Sr. Ranger PRR Doc Twizel PRR’s work area, the Upper Waitakai Catchment PRR Strategic Plans: ? 1991-1998 Brown/Sanders 1998-2005 Woolmore/Sanders 2005-2012 Rebergen/Woolmore 2012-2019 PRR in the early days: Run as an ‘independent’ project, with a PRR Manager, PRR Scientist and (up to four seasonal) staff. Bird focus. Focus on research, survey & monitoring & ambitious large scale weed projects, often in compromised areas (Tekapo delta, lower Ahuriri). All research published in peer reviewed journals. Strong participation from universities, students doing projects every year. Some interpretation/education: media, signs, brochures. Now…. Fully integrated in DOC Twizel, but with its own budget, currently approx. $525K/year (indexed and any surplus can be carried over). No PRR Manager, or scientist. Twizel Operations Manager is responsible for PRR. Strong focus on river habitat management. Current PRR staffing is a D-band Senior ranger, responsible for the day to day management of the project, a C-band ranger and .5 FTE B-band ranger (weeds). No Seasonal staff. Technical expertise is provided by DOC scientists (and Braided River Specialist Group) based in Christchurch. Most weed control work is carried out by an experienced local weed contracting firm. More about our current work priorities later. What hasn’t changed? Weeds, especially Russell lupin, are an ongoing serious threat to braided rivers. We focus on those rivers that can be managed with current methods within our budget. High altitude rivers are our priority. We no longer target badly weed infested lower altitude (parts of) rivers, e.g.
  • Waitaki WQ Modelling Draft Report

    Waitaki WQ Modelling Draft Report

    Waitaki Water Quality Catchment Modelling Prepared for Environment Canterbury May 2015 Prepared by : Christopher Palliser Sandy Elliott Sharleen Yalden Ude Shankar For any information regarding this report please contact: Christopher Palliser Scientist Catchment Processes +64-7-856 1748 [email protected] National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd PO Box 11115 Hamilton 3251 Phone +64 7 856 7026 NIWA CLIENT REPORT No: HAM2015-002 Report date: May 2015 NIWA Project: ENC14202 Quality Assurance Statement Dr Annette Semadeni-Davies Reviewed by: Urban aquatic scientist NIWA Auckland Formatting checked by: A. Bartley Approved for release by: D. Roper © All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced or copied in any form without the permission of the copyright owner(s). Such permission is only to be given in accordance with the terms of the client’s contract with NIWA. This copyright extends to all forms of copying and any storage of material in any kind of information retrieval system. Whilst NIWA has used all reasonable endeavours to ensure that the information contained in this document is accurate, NIWA does not give any express or implied warranty as to the completeness of the information contained herein, or that it will be suitable for any purpose(s) other than those specifically contemplated during the Project or agreed by NIWA and the Client. Contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................. 5 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................
  • The Hydro Canals the Opportunity to Fish Around the Hydro-Electric Schemes, Which Are Privately Owned and Operated, Is Maintained for Future Generations of Anglers

    The Hydro Canals the Opportunity to Fish Around the Hydro-Electric Schemes, Which Are Privately Owned and Operated, Is Maintained for Future Generations of Anglers

    CANAL ETIQUETTE There are a few things to keep in mind when fishing the canals that will keep your visit enjoyable and ensure that The Hydro Canals the opportunity to fish around the hydro-electric schemes, which are privately owned and operated, is maintained for future generations of anglers. The Tekapo Canal is owned by Genesis Energy while the Pukaki and Ōhau canal chain is owned by Meridian Energy. R Cosgrove An 18 pound brown trout from the Pukaki Canal Rubbish – Your rubbish and fish waste is your responsibility, pack-in and pack-out. If you are fishing near the Ōhau power stations, large skip bins are provided by Meridian for your use. Do not leave fish frames and guts in the margins of the water, wrap them in paper and a plastic bag and dispose of them in the skip bins. Please also be careful not to snag your line in the power station intakes, fishing nylon is causing R Adams blockages to the intake screens, which then causes issues for A salmon caught near the farm pens on the Tekapo Canal hydro generation. Be considerate of others – The canals are popular, and you Toilets – Toilets are provided on the canals and in the Tekapo will encounter other anglers, and often in close proximity. and Twizel townships. On the Tekapo Canal portaloos Anglers use a range of fishing methods and styles at the are provided while toilets are available and signposted at canals and they are not always compatible with how you the power station buildings of the Ōhau A, B and C power will intend to fish.
  • SECTION 1: Aoraki/Mt Cook to Braemar Road

    SECTION 1: Aoraki/Mt Cook to Braemar Road

    Aoraki/Mt Cook to Braemar Road LEVEL 1000 SECTION 1: 35km 800 AORAKI/MOUNT COOK AORAKI/MOUNT LAKE OHAU LODGE LAKE OHAU 600 BRAEMAR ROAD TWIZEL OMARAMA 400 OTEMATATA Fitness: Easy • Skill: Easy • Traffic: Low • Grade: 2 KUROW 200 DUNTROON OAMARU 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 The Alps 2 Ocean Cycle Trail starts at the White Horse Hill Campground, AORAKI/MT COOK 1 WHITE HORSE HILL CAMPGROUND which is 2km north of Mt Cook Village. MOUNT COOK VILLAGE From here, a 7.2km off-road trail takes you to Mount Cook Airport, BURNETT MOUNTAINS where riders will need to make a short MOUNT COOK AIRPORT helicopter flight across the Tasman River to Tasman Point. Travelling in TASMAN POINT a helicopter across a glacially-fed Tasman Valley braided stream with New Zealand’s highest mountain in view is a must Track NEUMANN RANGE do. The helicopter can carry up to 6 FRED’S STREAM passengers at a time (depending on weight limits). TASMAN RIVER JOLLIE RIVER BEN OHAU RANGE Helicopter Line: 0800 650 651 [Mt Cook Airport, Glentanner Park Centre/ SH80 Fred’s Stream] Jollie Carpark Braemar-Mount Cook Station Rd Heliworks: 0800 666 668 [Mt Cook Airport] From Tasman Point it’s 10.6km to the Jollie Car Park at the top of Hayman GLENTANNER PARK CENTRE Rd. On a clear day this section of trail LANDSLIP CREEK offers views of Aoraki/Mt Cook, which at 3,754 metres towers above a range of snow washed peaks in the Aoraki/ LAKE PUKAKI NEW!Mt Cook National Park.

  • South Island Fishing Regulations for 2020

    Fish & Game 1 2 3 4 5 6 Check www.fishandgame.org.nz for details of regional boundaries Code of Conduct ....................................................................4 National Sports Fishing Regulations ...................................... 5 First Schedule ......................................................................... 7 1. Nelson/Marlborough .......................................................... 11 2. West Coast ........................................................................16 3. North Canterbury ............................................................. 23 4. Central South Island ......................................................... 33 5. Otago ................................................................................44 6. Southland .........................................................................54 The regulations printed in this guide booklet are subject to the Minister of Conservation’s approval. A copy of the published Anglers’ Notice in the New Zealand Gazette is available on www.fishandgame.org.nz Cover Photo: Jaymie Challis 3 Regulations CODE OF CONDUCT Please consider the rights of others and observe the anglers’ code of conduct • Always ask permission from the land occupier before crossing private property unless a Fish & Game access sign is present. • Do not park vehicles so that they obstruct gateways or cause a hazard on the road or access way. • Always use gates, stiles or other recognised access points and avoid damage to fences. • Leave everything as you found it. If a gate is open or closed leave it that way. • A farm is the owner’s livelihood and if they say no dogs, then please respect this. • When driving on riverbeds keep to marked tracks or park on the bank and walk to your fishing spot. • Never push in on a pool occupied by another angler. If you are in any doubt have a chat and work out who goes where. • However, if agreed to share the pool then always enter behind any angler already there. • Move upstream or downstream with every few casts (unless you are alone).