DOCSLIB.ORG

June 23, 2014 Workshop Transcript Conditional Pricing Practices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

June 23, 2014 Workshop Transcript Conditional Pricing Practices: Economic Analysis & Policy Implications Federal Trade Commission and U.S. Department of Justice June 23, 2014 FTC Conference Center 400 Seventh Street, SW Washington, DC 20024 [Video 1 of 8] Introductory Remarks Remarks: Assistant Attorney General William J. Baer (DOJ) ....................................... 4 Remarks: Commissioner Maureen K. Ohlhausen (FTC) ............................................... 7 Overview of the Economics of Conditional Pricing Practices Presentation: Michael Waldman (Cornell) & Michael Whinston (MIT) .................... 11 [Video 2 of 8] The Economics of Conditional Pricing Practices Presentation: Michael A. Salinger (Boston University) ............................................... 28 Presentation: Abraham L. Wickelgren (University of Texas) ...................................... 33 Presentation: Timothy J. Brennan (UMBC) ................................................................. 39 Presentation: Benjamin Klein (UCLA) ......................................................................... 43 Discussion: Francine Lafontaine (University of Michigan) .......................................... 49 Discussion: Randal Heeb (Bates White) ...................................................................... 50 Moderators: Patrick DeGraba (FTC), Patrick Greenlee (DOJ) [Video 3 of 8] The Economics of Conditional Pricing Practices, continued Presentation: Julie Holland Mortimer (Boston College) ............................................. 55 Presentation: Kusum Ailwadi (Dartmouth)................................................................. 61 Presentation: Joseph Farrell (UC Berkeley) ................................................................ 67 Presentation: Miguel de la Mano (European Commission) ........................................ 73 Discussion: C. Scott Hemphill (Columbia University) .................................................. 80 Discussion: Matthew Bennett (Charles River Associates) .......................................... 83 Moderators: Matthew C. Mandelberg (DOJ), Michael G. Vita (FTC) [Video 4 of 8] The Economics of Conditional Pricing Practices, continued Roundtable Discussion ................................................................................................ 87 Participants: Matthew Bennett (Charles River Associates), Benjamin Klein (UCLA), Francine Lafontaine (University of Michigan), Julie Holland Mortimer (Boston College), Michael Waldman (Cornell) Moderators: Patrick Greenlee (DOJ), Daniel O’Brien (FTC) [Video 5 of 8] Integrating the Economics of Exclusion with Current Legal Policy: Two Paradigms Presentation: Steven C. Salop (Georgetown) ........................................................... 104 2 [Video 6 of 8] The Law of Conditional Pricing Practices Presentation: Einer R. Elhauge (Boston University) ................................................. 115 Presentation: Daniel A. Crane (University of Michigan) ........................................... 120 Presentation: Randall Heeb (Bates White) ............................................................... 125 Presentation: Robert O’Donoghue (Brick Court Chambers) ..................................... 129 Discussion: Richard Brunell (AAI) .............................................................................. 134 Discussion: Willard K. Tom (Morgan, Lewis & Bockius) ............................................ 136 Moderators: Michael J. Bloom (FTC), Robert A. Potter (DOJ) [Video 7 of 8] The Law of Conditional Pricing Practices, continued Presentation: Jonathan Jacobson (Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati) .................... 140 Presentation: Sean P. Gates (Morrison & Foerster) ................................................. 144 Presentation: Leah Brannon (Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton) ............................ 149 Presentation: Fiona M. Scott Morton (Yale) ............................................................. 153 Discussion: Abraham L. Wickelgren (University of Texas) ........................................ 159 Discussion: Steven C. Salop (Georgetown) ............................................................... 160 Moderators: Samuel N. Weinstein (DOJ), Andrea Zach (FTC) [Video 8 of 8] Where Do We Go From Here: Open Questions and Policy Considerations Roundtable Discussion .............................................................................................. 163 Participants: Jonathan Baker (American University), Daniel A. Crane (University of Michigan), C. Scott Hemphill (Columbia University), Fiona M. Scott Morton (Yale), Richard M. Steuer (Mayer Brown), Michael Whinston (MIT) Moderators: Deborah L. Feinstein (FTC), Renata B. Hesse (DOJ) Closing Remarks Remarks: Andrew I. Gavil (FTC) ................................................................................ 181 Remarks: Robert A. Potter (DOJ) ............................................................................. 183 3 [START OF WORKSHOP] ANDREW I. GAVIL: To open today’s workshop, it is my very great pleasure to introduce and welcome Assistant Attorney General Bill Baer of the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division, who will offer some welcome remarks, to be followed by FTC Commissioner Maureen Ohlhausen. Please join me in welcoming Bill Baer. [APPLAUSE] INTRODUCTORY REMARKS • William J. Baer, Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice • Maureen K. Ohlhausen, Commissioner, Federal Trade Commission WILLIAM BAER: I am going to take Andy’s introduction as that my remarks are “welcome” rather than “welcoming remarks.” I want to welcome you all to this joint workshop, both those of you here in the room and those of you on the webcast. This joint Department of Justice/FTC Conditional Pricing Practices Workshop is a great celebratory event to be able to have this at the new FTC Conference Center. And it is great to share the podium not just with Andy and our next panel, but with Commissioner Ohlhausen. As many of you know, the FTC and the Department of Justice Antitrust Division have held a series of workshops over the years on significant antitrust policy and enforcement issues. The goal is to illuminate challenging antitrust problems and studying—having these kinds of hearings are integral to our effort to make smart enforcement decisions. Perhaps most importantly, they fulfill that joint commitment the two agencies have to work with the public in identifying issues of significant importance in antitrust policy. We work hard at both agencies to analyze and understand the difficult questions so each of us can make the right enforcement decisions. When these sorts of recurring problems with broad implications for the economy arise, we think it is very helpful, very productive, to bring the best and the brightest together to discuss the issues. That is why in the last couple of 4 years we have held workshops on most favored nation clauses and patent assertion entity activities. And that is why we are holding today’s Conditional Pricing Practices Workshop. These practices, including loyalty and bundled pricing, are common throughout the economy. They arise in many forms and across many industries. And there’s debate, considerable debate, among lawyers, among economists, and others about the competitive effects and what the right legal analysis is in evaluating them. Courts that have analyzed loyalty and bundled pricing have generated different and sometimes conflicting tests for finding liability. We are aware, and I think need to continue to be aware, that conditional pricing practices, in many cases, save consumers money. Many of us benefit from some kind of loyalty or bundle pricing in the retail setting. You may have gotten a cup of coffee this morning and used your smartphone app or your frequent buyer card in your pocket to get a free latte. Others take advantage of bundled pricing at fast food restaurants where you can get—you can super-size it, get your fries, your burger, your 74 ounce Coke. Those tend to be cheaper than buying them separately. These are not, as a general matter, the kinds of conditional pricing practices we worry about. We do have concerns, however, when a monopolist, when a dominant firm uses loyalty or bundled pricing in a way that restricts competition and maintains or enhances a position of market power within a supply chain. The Division’s most recent enforcement action in this area was in 2011 involving United Regional Health Care system of Wichita Falls, Texas. United Regional enjoyed significant market power. It had entered into contracts with insurers that required them to pay significantly higher prices if they contracted with competing hospitals. Because the insurers needed United Regional's business—it was the dominant firm in the area to compete in Wichita Falls. The penalty for contracting with rivals was so severe that almost every insurer in the area entered into exclusive dealing arrangements with United Regional. That, in turn, reinforced the dominant position of United Regional, and it kept prices higher. Our enforcement action ultimately resulted, done jointly with the Texas AG’s office, in a consent decree, which prevented United Regional from engaging in these practices going forward. 5 Now, as I said at the beginning, it is not always easy to draw the line between the pricing practices that injure competition and those that don’t. We want to be careful in drawing that line because we don’t want to discourage the kinds of legitimate discounts
Recommended publications
  • Here a Causal Relationship? Contemporary Economics, 9(1), 45–60

    Here a Causal Relationship? Contemporary Economics, 9(1), 45–60

    Bibliography on Corruption and Anticorruption Professor Matthew C. Stephenson Harvard Law School http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/mstephenson/ March 2021 Aaken, A., & Voigt, S. (2011). Do individual disclosure rules for parliamentarians improve government effectiveness? Economics of Governance, 12(4), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-011-0100-8 Aaronson, S. A. (2011a). Does the WTO Help Member States Clean Up? Available at SSRN 1922190. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1922190 Aaronson, S. A. (2011b). Limited partnership: Business, government, civil society, and the public in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). Public Administration and Development, 31(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.588 Aaronson, S. A., & Abouharb, M. R. (2014). Corruption, Conflicts of Interest and the WTO. In J.-B. Auby, E. Breen, & T. Perroud (Eds.), Corruption and conflicts of interest: A comparative law approach (pp. 183–197). Edward Elgar PubLtd. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:hul.ebookbatch.GEN_batch:ELGAR01620140507 Abbas Drebee, H., & Azam Abdul-Razak, N. (2020). The Impact of Corruption on Agriculture Sector in Iraq: Econometrics Approach. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 553(1), 12019-. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/553/1/012019 Abbink, K., Dasgupta, U., Gangadharan, L., & Jain, T. (2014). Letting the briber go free: An experiment on mitigating harassment bribes. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 111(Journal Article), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.12.012 Abbink, Klaus. (2004). Staff rotation as an anti-corruption policy: An experimental study. European Journal of Political Economy, 20(4), 887–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2003.10.008 Abbink, Klaus.
  • “Racist, Sexist, Profane, and Violent”: Reinterpreting WWE's Portrayals of Samoans Across Generations

    “Racist, Sexist, Profane, and Violent”: Reinterpreting WWE's Portrayals of Samoans Across Generations

    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Plan B and other Reports Graduate Studies 8-2020 “Racist, Sexist, Profane, and Violent”: Reinterpreting WWE’s Portrayals of Samoans Across Generations John Honey Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/gradreports Part of the American Popular Culture Commons Recommended Citation Honey, John, "“Racist, Sexist, Profane, and Violent”: Reinterpreting WWE’s Portrayals of Samoans Across Generations" (2020). All Graduate Plan B and other Reports. 1469. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/gradreports/1469 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Plan B and other Reports by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 2 Copyright © John B. Honey 2020 All Rights Reserved 3 ABSTRACT “Racist, Sexist, Profane, and Violent”: Reinterpreting WWE’s Portrayals of Samoans across Generations By John B. Honey, Master of Science Utah State University, 2020 Major Professor: Dr. Eric César Morales Program: American Studies This paper examines the shifting portrayals of Pacific Islanders in World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) across three generations. As both a popular and historically racially problematic venue, WWE’s politically incorrect programming has played an underappreciated and under examined role in representing the USA. Although 4 many different groups have been portrayed by gross stereotypes in WWE, this paper uses the family of Dwayne “the Rock” Johnson—the Samoan Dynasty—as a case study. The WWE originally presented Pacific Islanders using the most offensive stereotypes, and the first two generations of the Samoan Dynasty had to “play Indian” or cosign onto gross representations of their people to be recognized by American audiences unfamiliar with representations of Pacific Islanders.
  • Tartan Wrestling Philosophy

    Tartan Wrestling Philosophy

    Tartan Wrestling Philosophy Mission Statement: The Tartan Wrestling Program believes there is more to life than athletics. It is our desire to develop not only great wrestlers, but great students and kids who demonstrate outstanding character. This program will measure its success not only in wins and losses, but also in our wrestlers’ abilities to have productive and successful lives. Wrestling Philosophy: Wrestling is a sport that requires more than talent. It takes physical and mental discipline as well as sound fundamentals. A Tartan wrestler should work relentlessly to maximize his potential in all of these areas. Although this staff teaches specific technical components of this sport, it is our belief that there is more than one way to wrestle. We work tirelessly to bring in an array of technique, giving each individual the best chance at personal success. There is however on area of wrestling that we believe is absolute. A Tartan wrestler must be a hard worker who strives to be in the best physical shape possible. We believe in the adage, “hard work beats talents, when talent doesn’t work hard.” Our expectations of our wrestlers are that they will out work their opponent each and every day. Our objective is to wear our opponent down so that we can physically break them. The third period should be our best, as our opponent fatigues and we are able to remain fundamentally sound due to superior conditioning. It is no accident when a Tartan wrestler wins a close match or a match in which they trailed. NEEDS AND VALUES OF WRESTLING The wrestling mat provides a constructive outlet for energies that are symptomatic of restless and uncertain teenagers.
  • Product Secrets: 21 Different Ways to Create Products for Your Offers!

    Product Secrets: 21 Different Ways to Create Products for Your Offers!

    INTRO Product Secrets: 21 Different Ways To Create Products For Your Offers! When someone starts the Two Comma Club X Program, one of the most important things we try to teach right off the bat is, “Stop selling products and start creating offers!” The fact is, an offer is actually a bundle of products stacked together, all designed to make it irresistible to the customer. Which means, when you create an offer, you need to first create the products that go inside that offer. This often leads to paralysis because designing one product from scratch is hard enough, never mind a bundle of them. Then there’s the issue of time involved, and how can you produce these products quickly? This newsletter is going to outline 21 different possible product ideas. It’s designed to get your wheels turning so you can open your mind the possibilities (which are endless). One thing I want to make sure of is that you have a plethora of ideas to choose from! Before we dive into the product ideas, there’s a foundational piece to product creation that’s very important. PLATA O PLOMO (BRibE OR THE BULLET) 1 “People will spend more money for the exact same product packaged in a different way.” The first time I ever really understood this concept, was when people started telling me, “You have to read the book, Think and Grow Rich!” So I went to Amazon and bought it. The copy of this book cost me $9.99. When it ar- rived, I put it on my nightstand and...
  • The Oral Poetics of Professional Wrestling, Or Laying the Smackdown on Homer

    The Oral Poetics of Professional Wrestling, Or Laying the Smackdown on Homer

    Oral Tradition, 29/1 (201X): 127-148 The Oral Poetics of Professional Wrestling, or Laying the Smackdown on Homer William Duffy Since its development in the first half of the twentieth century, Milman Parry and Albert Lord’s theory of “composition in performance” has been central to the study of oral poetry (J. M. Foley 1998:ix-x). This theory and others based on it have been used in the analysis of poetic traditions like those of the West African griots, the Viking skalds, and, most famously, the ancient Greek epics.1 However, scholars have rarely applied Parry-Lord theory to material other than oral poetry, with the notable exceptions of musical forms like jazz, African drumming, and freestyle rap.2 Parry and Lord themselves, on the other hand, referred to the works they catalogued as performances, making it possible to use their ideas beyond poetry and music. The usefulness of Parry-Lord theory in studies of different poetic traditions tempted me to view other genres of performance from this perspective. In this paper I offer up one such genre for analysis —professional wrestling—and show that interpreting the tropes of wrestling through the lens of composition in performance provides information that, in return, can help with analysis of materials more commonly addressed by this theory. Before beginning this effort, it will be useful to identify the qualities that a work must possess to be considered a “composition in performance,” in order to see if professional wrestling qualifies. The first, and probably most important and straightforward, criterion is that, as Lord (1960:13) says, “the moment of composition is the performance.” This disqualifies art forms like theater and ballet, works typically planned in advance and containing words and/or actions that must be performed at precise times and following a precise order.
  • Aztec Human Sacrifice

    Aztec Human Sacrifice

    EIGHT AZTEC HUMAN SACRIFICE ALFREDO LOPÉZ AUSTIN, UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO, ANO LEONARDO LÓPEZ LUJÁN, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ANTROPOLOGíA E HISTORIA Stereotypes are persistent ideas of reality generally accepted by a social group. In many cases, they are conceptions that simplify and even caricaturize phenomena of a complex nature. When applied to societies or cultures, they l11ayinclude value judgments that are true or false, specific or ambiguous. If the stereotype refers to orie's own tradition, it emphasizes the positive and the virtuous, and it tends to praise: The Greeks are recalled as philosophers and the Romans as great builders. On the other hand, if the stereotype refers to another tradition , it stresses the negative, the faulty, and it tends to denigrate: For many, Sicilians naturally belong to the Mafia, Pygrnies are cannibals, and the Aztecs were cruel sacrificers. As we will see, many lines of evidence confirm that hurnan sacrifice was one the most deeply rooted religious traditions of the Aztecs. However, it is clear that the Aztecs were not the only ancient people that carried out massacres in honor of their gods, and there is insufficient quantitative inforrnation to determine whether the Aztecs were the people who practiced hu- man sacrifice 1110stoften. Indeed, sacred texts, literary works, historie documents, and especially evidence contributed by archaeology and physical anthropology, enable religious historians to determine that the practice of hurnan sacrifice was common in most parts of the ancient world. For exarnple, evidence of sacrifice and can n iba lism has emerged in l11any parts ofEurope, dating to the Neolithic and Bronze Ages.
  • Paper Corruption As a Self-Reinforcing

    Paper Corruption As a Self-Reinforcing

    CORRUPTION AS A SELF-REINFORCING “TRAP”: IMPLICATIONS FOR REFORM STRATEGY MATTHEW C. STEPHENSON* Abstract: Corruption is widely believed to be a self-reinforcing phenomenon, in the sense that the incentive to engage in corrupt acts increases as corruption becomes more widespread in the relevant community. Leading scholars have argued that corruption’s self-fulfilling property implies that incremental anticorruption reforms cannot be effective, and that the only way to escape a high-corruption equilibrium “trap” is through a “big bang” approach. This paper demonstrates that this widespread view is mistaken: After surveying the reasons corruption might be self-reinforcing (or in some cases self- limiting), the paper demonstrates that corruption’s self-reinforcing property does not imply the necessity of a “big bang” approach to reform, and indeed may strengthen the case for pursuing sustained, cumulative incremental anticorruption reforms. * Eli Goldston Professor of Law, Harvard Law School. I am grateful to Ray Fisman, Miriam Golden, Dan Hough, Nils Köbis, Ina Kubbe, Paul Lagunes, Louis Kaplow, Rick Messick, Ben Olken, Bonnie Jo Palifka, Susan Rose-Ackerman, Kathy Spier, Cass Sunstein, and Matthew Taylor, as well as workshop participants at Harvard, FGV Direito Rio (Brazil), and the Universidad de la Republica (Uruguay), for helpful comments and suggestions. 1 In many settings, an individual’s decision whether to engage in some action is contingent on how many other people engage (or are expected to engage) in similar behavior. Some conduct is self-reinforcing, in the sense that an individual’s incentive to engage in that conduct is stronger when the conduct is more widespread.
  • Pablo Escobar: Drug Lord As Heroic Archetype Adem Ahmed Bucknell University, Aa023@Bucknell.Edu

    Pablo Escobar: Drug Lord As Heroic Archetype Adem Ahmed Bucknell University, [email protected]

    Bucknell University Bucknell Digital Commons Honors Theses Student Theses 2016 Pablo Escobar: Drug Lord as Heroic Archetype Adem Ahmed Bucknell University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses Recommended Citation Ahmed, Adem, "Pablo Escobar: Drug Lord as Heroic Archetype" (2016). Honors Theses. 344. https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses/344 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses at Bucknell Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Bucknell Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PABLO ESCOBAR Drug Lord as Heroic Archetype by Adem Ahmed Submitted to the Honors Council For Honors In Comparative Humanities April 1, 2016 Approved by: ________________________ Adviser: James Mark Shields ________________________ Co-Adviser: David Rojas _______________________ Department Chair: Katherine Faull 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank Professor James Shields, both my academic and primary thesis advisor. His patience, dedication and continual support in my endeavors have played a large role in my accomplishments. I would like to thank Professor David Rojas, who courteously agreed to serve as my co- advisor. As a native Colombian, without his expertise I would not have been able to complete this thesis. I also find it appropriate to thank Professor Slava Yastremski, who served as my advisor for as long as he could. Lastly, I would like to thank my family for their continuous support in both my personal and academic success. My gratitude towards them cannot be expressed in words.
  • Oral History Interview December 20, 2001, March 7, 21, April 4, May 2

    Oral History Interview December 20, 2001, March 7, 21, April 4, May 2

    California State Archives State Government Oral History Program Oral History Interview with CATHIE WRIGHT California State Assemblywoman, 1981-1992 California State Senator, 1993-2000 December 20, 2001, March 7, 21, April 4, May 2, 16, 30, June 6, 2002 Simi Valley, California By Susan Douglass Yates Oral History Program University ofCalifornia, Los Angeles RESTRICTIONS ON THIS INTERVIEW None. LITERARY RIGHTS AND QUOTATION This manuscriptis herebymade available for researchpurposes only. No part of the manuscriptmay be quoted for publication without the written permission of the California State Archivist or the Head, Department ofSpecial Collections, Charles E. Young Research Library, UCLA. Requests for permission to quote forpublication should be addressed to: California State Archives 1020 O Street, Room 130 Sacramento, CA 94814 or Department ofSpecial Collections Charles E. Young Research Library P.O.Box 951575 UCLA Los Angeles, CA 90095-1575 The request should include identification ofthe specific passages and identification ofthe user. It is recommended that this oral history be cited as follows: CathieWright, OralHistoryInterview, Conducted 2001 and 2002 by Susan Douglass Yates, UCLA Oral History Program, forthe California StateArchives State Government Oral History Program. Secretary of State KEVIN SHELLEY State of California PREFACE On September 25, 1985, Governor George Deukmejian signed into law A.B. 2104 (Chapter 965 of the Statutesof 1985). This legislation established, under the administration ofthe California State Archives, a State Government Oral History Program"to provide throughthe use of oral history a continuing documentation of statepolicydevelopment asreflected in California's legislative and executive history." Thefollowing interview is one of a series of oralhistories undertaken for inclusion in the stateprogram.
  • The Complex Relationship Between Motherhood and Desistance

    The Complex Relationship Between Motherhood and Desistance

    Women & Criminal Justice, 26:212–231, 2016 Copyright # Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 0897-4454 print/1541-0323 online DOI: 10.1080/08974454.2015.1113153 The Complex Relationship Between Motherhood and Desistance Ronet Bachman Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA Erin M. Kerrison Department of Criminology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Raymond Paternoster Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA Lionel Smith Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA Daniel O’Connell Center for Drug and Health Studies, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA Using a sample of 118 drug-involved women originally released from prison in the 1990s and re- interviewed between 2010 and 2011, this paper examines the role motherhood played in the desist- ance process from crime and substance abuse. Interview narratives revealed that motherhood rarely functioned as a turning point per se that activated desistance, but caring for children did serve to solidify prosocial identities once offenders had transformed their addict/criminal identities. Despite Downloaded by [68.82.20.222] at 18:39 17 May 2016 their identity transformations, however, the journey of desistance for the majority of mothers was still a long and arduous path. The reality for these mothers most often resembled a hostile terrain marked by the competing demands of battling addiction, finding employment and suitable housing with a criminal record, establishing visitation and custody rights in family court, and regaining the trust of children and family members who had long ago lost faith in their commitment to their families.
  • Annual Compilation of Wrestling Research

    Annual Compilation of Wrestling Research

    2020 Annual Compilation of Wrestling Research David Curby, EdD [email protected] The Annual Compilation of Wrestling Research 2020 is compilation of published wrestling- related research published during 2020 and is provided by the International Network of Wrestling Researchers (INWR). The INWR is the largest scientific support group for a sport in the world! Our group has grown to over 500 academics, scientists, doctors and wrestling professionals, from 82 countries who are involved with the sport of wrestling. (www.inwr-wrestling.com) Our Mission Statement is: The International Network of Wrestling Researchers (INWR) seeks to facilitate the development of wrestling around the world by drawing all wrestling sport science professionals together, in a manner that through our international and intercultural cooperation we are empowered to support the development of wrestling with our research and educational programs. We have organized scientific meetings at the senior world wrestling championships and we were instrumental in working with United World Wrestling (UWW) in establishing the Scientific Commission. The INWR sponsors the Rayko Petrov Award memorializing the great Bulgarian wrestler, coach and prolific scholar. Each year the INWR names the person to be honored and that person delivers the memorial lecture at the INWR Annual Meeting. They are presented with the spectacular bronze trophy by Christo Christov commissioned by the Bulgarian Wrestling Federation. The Young Researcher Award is also presented to a researcher less than thirty years of age. We publish the International Journal of Wrestling Science which is the only journal dedicated to the study of the world’s oldest sport. The International Journal of Wrestling Science is a peer reviewed journal for professionals working in wrestling and wrestling sport science.
  • Monarch Wrestling Handbook

    Monarch Wrestling Handbook

    Monarch Wrestling Handbook ALL DECISIONS REGARDING THESE GUIDELINES AS WELL AS HOW THEY ARE CARRIED OUT IS LEFT TO THE DISCRETION OF THE HEAD WRESTLING COACH Monarch Wrestling Program Team Goals: 1. OCC Champions 2. Sectional Champions 3. District Champions 4. Regional Champions 5. 5+ State Qualifiers 6. 5+ State Placers 7. Top 5 Finish @ State A goal without a plan is just a wish. Team Philosophies 1) We will work harder than our opponents; there is no substitute for hard work. 2) Respect- we will treat each other with respect, this doesn’t mean we will like everyone on the tem but we will treat each other with the respect they deserve by being here working hard side by side. 3) Every day is a chance to get better, take advantage of it. “Do Right Rule” The Marysville Wrestling coaches make the assumption that all Monarch Wrestlers know the difference between “right and wrong”. Monarch wrestlers are always expected to make the “right” decision in relation to matters of behavior, discipline, and academics. If a wrestler makes a “wrong” decision in relation to matters of behavior, discipline and academics, the coaching staff will assume that it was a conscious decision on the part of the athlete to do so… and the athlete will therefore be held accountable for willfully making a “wrong” decision. Accountability can range from being counseled by the head coach, suspension or dismissal from the team all to be decided according to the Marysville High School Athletic Code. The “Do Right Rule” is in effect 24 hours a day, both at school and away, for the duration of the athlete’s participation in the Monarch Wrestling Program.