DOCSLIB.ORG

The London School of Economics and Political Science Through The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The London School of Economics and Political Science Through The The London School of Economics and Political Science Through the Looking Glass: Controversy, Scandal and Political Careers Jessica Tarlov A thesis submitted to the Department of Government of the London School of Economics for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, July 2012 1 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 55,480 words. Statement of conjoint work I confirm that Chapter Seven was jointly co-authored with Dr Nick Vivyan and Dr Markus Wagner and I contributed 33.3 % of this work. Statement of use of third party for editorial help I can confirm that my thesis was proofread for conventions of language, spelling and grammar by Kate Rosengarten of Kateproof. Contact details available upon request. 2 This thesis is dedicated to my parents who always pushed me to answer the difficult questions and to take the time to do so properly. Professor Torun Dewan has been a tremendous supervisor and I am grateful to him for his input throughout this process. Professor Simon Hix has reassured me every step of the way that this day would come and I thank him for his positivity, guidance and support. Markus and Nick have both taught me an incredible amount and I have appreciated their help enormously. 3 Abstract This work measures whether MPs are held individually accountable for their actions through a novel analysis of the 1997 and 2010 UK general elections. Previous research suggests that MPs’ behaviour has little effect on their careers; however, developments in the media’s aggressive reporting style, the rise of personality politics and decline in traditional voting patterns indicate that this is an opportune time to examine the effect of political controversies (including scandals) on MPs’ careers. This analysis focuses on three crucial stages that form a chain of accountability: (1) exposure: the media publicises the controversy and a perception is formed; (2) internal sanction: an MP retires before an election; (3) electoral sanction: voters punish MPs at the polls. Data on MP-specific controversies between the 1992 and 1997 and the 2005 and 2010 elections was sourced from The Times, The Guardian, The Daily Telegraph and their respective Sunday editions. This work also contains an original analysis of the 2009–2010 MP expenses scandal that utilises British Election Study panel survey data to examine how information on MP malfeasance affects voters’ perceptions of MPs. The findings indicate that political controversy is linked to whether an MP retires, with those MPs from the governing party driving the result in both the 1997 and 2010 elections. Overall, voters do not hold MPs responsible for their actions at the polls. Analysis of the expenses scandal supports these general findings: constituent perceptions of their MPs’ expenses behaviour respond to public information, but do not translate into election results. Internal sanction is shown to be the most powerful form of political accountability in the chain. While identifying any individual MP accountability is novel, the overall results are in line with traditional analyses of the strength of party politics, and indicate the importance of electoral system design for accountability. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Declaration .......................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................................... 8 LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................................................ 9 Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 10 1.1 A period of crisis ................................................................................................................................................. 10 1.2 What matters to the public? ........................................................................................................................... 13 1.3 Testing the waters .............................................................................................................................................. 16 1.4 A preview of what is to come ........................................................................................................................ 18 1.5 Findings at a glance ........................................................................................................................................... 20 1.6 Chapter plan ......................................................................................................................................................... 22 Chapter 2: Literature ..................................................................................................................................................... 23 2.1 Where do we begin? .......................................................................................................................................... 23 2.2 Media ....................................................................................................................................................................... 24 2.3 Support for political actors and institutions .......................................................................................... 28 2.4 Specific and diffuse support ........................................................................................................................... 29 2.5 Accountability and institutional context: room for the personal vote? ...................................... 33 2.6 Political accountability ..................................................................................................................................... 39 2.7 Partisan effects and political judgements ................................................................................................ 44 2.8 Concluding remarks .......................................................................................................................................... 50 Chapter 3: Case selection, definitions and coding ............................................................................................ 51 3.1 Case selection ....................................................................................................................................................... 51 3.2 Source selection .................................................................................................................................................. 54 3.3 Approach and coding ........................................................................................................................................ 55 3.4 Descriptive statistics ......................................................................................................................................... 65 3.5 Concluding comments ...................................................................................................................................... 69 Chapter 4: MPs and dependent variables – asking the right questions .................................................. 70 4.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 70 4.2 Background ........................................................................................................................................................... 71 4.3 Dependent variables ......................................................................................................................................... 72 4.4 Standing down ..................................................................................................................................................... 74 4.5 Controversy and vote share ........................................................................................................................... 77 4.6 Background characteristics ........................................................................................................................... 78 5 4.7 Descriptive statistics ......................................................................................................................................... 83 4.8 Predicting political scandal ...........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Standards of Conduct in the House of Lords by the Committee on Standards in Public Life
    ISBN 0-10-149032-1 9 780101 490320 Volume 1: Report Cm 4903-I 0101490321_Cover.pdf 1 5/6/09 09:47:52 0101490321_POD / Sig: 2 / Plate B iv iv 0101490321_POD / Sig: 2 / Plate B B Plate / 2 Sig: / 0101490321_POD 0101490321_POD / Sig: 1 / Plate A Cm 4903-I Cm November 2000 November by Command of Her Majesty Her of Command by Presented to Parliament by the Prime Minister Prime the by Parliament to Presented Seventh Report of the Committee on Standards in Public Life Chairman: Lord Neill of Bladen QC Volume 1: Report 1: Volume Standards of Conduct in the House of Lords in the House of Lords of House the in Standards of Conduct of Standards Volume 1: Report Chairman: Lord Neill of Bladen QC Bladen of Neill Lord Chairman: Standards in Public Life Public in Standards Seventh Report of the Committee on Committee the of Report Seventh Presented to Parliament by the Prime Minister by Command of Her Majesty November 2000 Cm 4903-I 0101490321_POD / Sig: 1 / Plate A A Plate / 1 Sig: / 0101490321_POD 0101490321_POD / Sig: 1 / Plate B ii .uk Fax: 01603-723000 or e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: or 01603-723000 Fax: HMSO, The Copyright Unit, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ. NR3 Norwich Colegate, 2-16 House, Clements St Unit, Copyright The HMSO, Any enquiries relating to the copyright in this document should be addressed to addressed be should document this in copyright the to relating enquiries Any included when being reproduced as part of another publication or service. or publication another of part as reproduced being when included must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document must be must document the of title the and copyright Crown as acknowledged be must in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context.
    [Show full text]
  • Register of All-Party Groups
    REGISTER OF ALL-PARTY GROUPS (As at 13 June 2007) REGISTER OF ALL-PARTY GROUPS PAGE 2 SECTION 1: COUNTRY GROUPS TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction............................................................................................................................... 2 The Nature of All-Party Groups ..................................................................................... 2 Purpose and Form of the ‘Register of All-Party Groups’............................................... 2 Purpose and Form of the ‘Approved List’ of Groups..................................................... 2 Administration of the Register and Approved List......................................................... 4 Complaints about All-Party Groups................................................................................ 4 Section 1: Country Groups ...................................................................................................... 6 Section 2: Subject Groups.................................................................................................... 141 REGISTER OF ALL-PARTY GROUPS PAGE 3 SECTION 1: COUNTRY GROUPS INTRODUCTION The Nature of All-Party Groups All-party groups are regarded as relatively informal compared with other cross-party bodies such as select committees of the House. The membership of all-party groups mainly comprises backbench Members of the House of Commons and Lords but may also include ministers and non-parliamentarians. Groups flourish and wane according to the interests and enthusiasm of Members.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: “Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament”
    Appendix: \Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament" August 8, 2017 Appendix Table of Contents • Appendix A: Wordscores Estimation of Ideology • Appendix B: MP Membership in Ideological Groups • Appendix C: Rebellion on Different Types of Divisions • Appendix D: Models of Rebellion on Government Sponsored Bills Only • Appendix E: Differences in Labour Party Rebellion Following Leadership Change • Appendix F: List of Party Switchers • Appendix G: Discussion of Empirical Model Appendix A: Wordscores Estimation of Ideology This Appendix describes our method for ideologically scaling British MPs using their speeches on the welfare state, which were originally produced for a separate study on welfare reform (O'Grady, 2017). We cover (i) data collection, (ii) estimation, (iii) raw results, and (iv) validity checks. The resulting scales turn out to be highly valid, and provide an excellent guide to MPs' ideologies using data that is completely separate to the voting data that forms the bulk of the evidence in our paper. A1: Collection of Speech Data Speeches come from an original collection of every speech made about issues related to welfare in the House of Commons from 1987-2007, covering the period over which the Labour party moved 1 to the center under Tony Blair, adopted and enacted policies of welfare reform, and won office at the expense of the Conservatives. Restricting the speeches to a single issue area is useful for estimating ideologies because with multiple topics there is a danger of conflating genuine extremism (a tendency to speak in extreme ways) with a tendency or requirement to talk a lot about topics that are relatively extreme to begin with (Lauderdale and Herzog, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • The Worshipful Company of Actuaries Annual Review 2009
    THE WORSHIPFUL COMPANY OF ACTUARIES ANNUAL REVIEW 2009 – 2010 Capital Cranfield Trustees are pleased to support the Worshipful Company of Actuaries “Independent Trustee of the Year” UK Pensions Awards, 2007 and 2008 Contents Page Court 2009 - 2010 2 Master’s Report 3 The Charitable Trust 6 Report from the Chairman of Trustees 6 Past Master goes up the wall 7 Liverymen encouraged to become school governors 8 Charitable Trust funds laptops for disadvantaged students 8 Royal Society 350th Anniversary Convocation 8 Life, death and money 9 Events 11 Installation Diner 11 Autumn Livery Dinner 12 The Lord Mayor’s Show 12 Visit to Big Ben and curry tiffin at the Cinnamon Club 13 Carol Service at St Bartholomew the Great 14 Common Hall and Livery Dinner 14 Livery Lecture - Hanging Hooke 16 Pancake Race 17 28th Annual Inter-Livery Bridge Competition 17 Livery Dinner, Cape Town 17 Inter-Livery Swimathon 18 10-Pin Bowling 18 Livery Lunch, Liverpool 19 Court Lunch 19 Golf Outing, Royal Troon 19 Providence Row City Quiz Night 20 Mansion House Banquet 21 Royalist Regatta 24 Prince Arthur of Connaught Golf Competition 24 Master’s Golf Day 25 Trip to Oberammergau 25 Clerk’s Dinner 27 News from the Court 28 Obituaries 31 Membership of the Company 35 Court and Committees 2010-2011 36 Diary 2011 37 1 THE WORSHIPFUL COMPANY OF ACTUARIES 2009 – 2010 SENIOR WARDEN MASTER JUNIOR WARDEN Graham Clay Adrian Waddingham John Lockyer COURT ASSISTANTS Ken Ayers, Andrew Benke, Charles Cowling, Nick Dumbreck, Alan Frost, Jeremy Goford, Richard Hawkes, Chris Ide, Philip
    [Show full text]
  • MS 254 A980 Women's Campaign for Soviet Jewry 1
    1 MS 254 A980 Women’s Campaign for Soviet Jewry 1 Administrative papers Parliamentary Correspondence Correspondence with Members of Parliament 1/1/1 Members of Parliament correspondence regarding support for the 1978-95 efforts of the Women’s Campaign for Soviet Jewry and brief profiles and contact details for individual Members of Parliament; Diane Abbot, Robert Adley, Jonathan Aitken, Richard Alexander, Michael Alison, Graham Allen, David Alton, David Amess, Donald Anderson, Hilary Armstrong, Jacques Arnold, Tom Arnold, David Ashby, Paddy Ashdown, Joe Ashton, Jack Aspinwall, Robert Atkins, and David Atkinson 1/1/2 Members of Parliament correspondence regarding support for the 1974-93 efforts of the Women’s Campaign for Soviet Jewry and brief profiles and contact details for individual Members of Parliament; Kenneth Baker, Nicholas Baker, Tony Baldry, Robert Banks, Tony Banks, Kevin Barron, Spencer Batiste and J. D. Battle 1/1/3 Members of Parliament correspondence regarding support for the 1974-93 efforts of the Women’s Campaign for Soviet Jewry and brief profiles and contact details for individual Members of Parliament; Margaret Beckett, Roy Beggs, Alan James Beith, Stuart Bell, Henry Bellingham, Vivian Bendall, Tony Benn, Andrew F. Bennett, Gerald Bermingham, John Biffen, John Blackburn, Anthony Blair, David Blunkett, Paul Boateng, Richard Body, Hartley Booth, Nichol Bonsor, Betty Boothroyd, Tim Boswell and Peter Bottomley 1/1/4 Members of Parliament correspondence regarding support for the 1975-94 efforts of the Women’s Campaign
    [Show full text]
  • M a Tth Ew P a Rris Matthew Parris 2
    ISSSUESUE 22:: JAANUARYNUARY 22006006 Been passed this issue? Click here to receive FREE MAGAZINE MAGAZINE MMatthewatthew PParrisarris 22:32...:32... Exclusive interview RRaceace BBallbusterallbuster rreporteport AAcrosscross UUltramanltraman - HHawaiiawaii AAmerica!merica! TThehe GGreatreat BBritishritish TTreblereble OOverlandverland ttoo TTimbuktuimbuktu KKnackernacker CrackerCracker rreporteport AArere yyouou wwhoho yyouou tthinkhink yyouou aare?re? FFitit bbutut llonelyonely hheartsearts ....and..and mmuchuch mmore...!ore...! ISSUE 2: JANUARY 2006 Been passed this issue? Click here to receive FREE MAGAZINE MAGAZINE Matthew Parris Feedback 2:32... Exclusive interview Ad index Race Ballbuster report Across Ultraman - Hawaii America! The Great British Treble Ordinary people doing extraordinary things Overland to Timbuktu Knacker Cracker report Are you who you think you are? Fit but lonely hearts ...and much more...! 3 The Trionium Manifesto 24 Overland to Timbuktu Reasons to be cheerful... Intrepid reporter Cathy Hillman travels to the heart of Mali, visiting the Bandiagara Escarpment 4 Trionium letters and the Dogon Plateau on her way to Timbuktu. This issue’s front cover... After the first issue of Trionium magazine, we Jure Robic of Slovenia powers include a selection of your responses. 29 (B)race across America his way towards winning the solo This event is so tough that your head may just men’s category in the 3052 mile 6 Matthew Parris digs in for 2:32 fall off your shoulders with tiredness. (Don’t 2005 Race Across America (page Political commentator and columnist has a secret: believe us? Read the story!). 29). The race includes ascent of 110,000 feet, more than four times he is the fastest MP of all time (er, except Seb the height of Everest..
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Information Bulletin
    Contents House of Commons • Noticeboard ..........................................................................................................1 • The Week Ahead..................................................................................................2 • Order of Oral Questions .......................................................................................3 Weekly Business Information • Business of the House of Commons 6 – 9 November 2007 .................................4 Bulletin • Written Ministerial Statements.............................................................................6 • Forthcoming Business of the House of Commons 12 – 16 November 2007........7 • Forthcoming Business of the House of Lords 12 – 16 November 2007.............10 Editor: Nick Majer Legislation House of Commons Information Office Public Legislation London • Public Bills before Parliament 2007/08..............................................................12 SW1A 2TT • Bills - Presentation, Publication and Royal Assent ............................................14 • Public and General Acts 2007/08 .......................................................................15 TEL: 020 7219 4272 • Draft Bills under consideration or published during 2006/07 Session ...............16 FAX: 020 7219 5839 [email protected] Private Legislation www.parliament.uk • Private Bills before Parliament 2007/08.............................................................18 Delegated Legislation To Contact the Editor: • Statutory Instruments .........................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • “Does Sexual Orientation Still Matter? the Impact of LGBT Candidate
    “Does sexual orientation still matter? The impact of LGBT candidate identity on vote share in the UK elections of 2015.” Andrew Reynolds and Gabriele Magni University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill In this paper we address the following question: In the United Kingdom, a country that has had a long history of homophobia curtailed by a recent and rapid period of transformation, does sexual orientation and gender identity remain a factor at election time? While the transformation of British law in the area of gay rights has been pronounced over the last fifteen years (most notably the equalization of the Age of Consent in 2000, the abolition of Section 28 of the Local Government Act in 2003, the introduction of civil unions in 2004 and of marriage equality in 2013) there remains much homophobia in British society. A 2013 report by Stonewall, Gay in Britain, found that the vast majority of lesbian and gay people in Britain expected their child to be bullied in school, that they faced prejudice in becoming a school governor, that they would be treated worse than straight people by the police and prison service, and that they would face barriers if they wanted to adopt or foster a child. One in five had experienced verbal bullying from colleagues or customers in the previous five years.1 Indeed, pernicious legal discrimination has left a legacy in many social realms and in some regions (most notably Northern Ireland) legal discrimination remains. The question of any lingering impact of sexual orientation on election outcomes is 1 https://www.stonewall.org.uk/resources/gay-britain-2013 important not only to understanding the evolution of gay rights but it speaks to the broader study of the consequences of descriptive representation and, relatedly, how rapid social change happens.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2002
    Nations and Regions: The Dynamics of Devolution Quarterly Monitoring Programme The English Regions Quarterly Report February 2002 John Tomaney and Peter Hetherington The monitoring programme is funded by the ESRC Monitoring the English Regions Report No. 6 (February 2002) Research supported by the Economic and Social Research Council John Tomaney, Peter Hetherington and Lynne Humphrey Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies University of Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK Tel. +44(0)191 222 8016 Fax. +44 (0)191 232 9259 Web: http://www.ncl.ac.uk/curds Monitoring the English Regions: Report No 6 [February 2002] Key issues The English regional question remained dominated by the implications of the Government's forthcoming White Paper on governance and the debates and conflicts surrounding it. A number of issues are worth reporting: • Downing Street appeared to have agreed to the case for referendums for regional assemblies, but at the price of linking this to a move to single tier local government, although the precise formulation of any stipulation remained unclear at the time of writing. • Some Whitehall departments continued to resist handing over powers to proposed regional assemblies in debates in Cabinet's Committee of Nations and Regions. • On the other hand, the Treasury continued to develop its 'new regional policy', publishing a study of 'regional productivity' as part of the 2001 Pre-Budget report and, seemingly, offering a unexpected degree of financial flexibility to proposed elected assemblies. • The CBI launched a strong attack on elected regional assemblies, mirroring arguments used by the DTI and RDA chairmen, and calling for RDAs to be left under control of government appointed 'business- led' boards.
    [Show full text]
  • New-Look Ukip Threatens Cameron's Legacy; by Rebranding Itself As a Movement, Not a Party, Ukip Would Become a Virus That Could Destroy Moderate Conservatism
    23 April 2016, The Times, Matthew Parris http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/opinion/columnists/article4737673.ece New-look Ukip threatens Cameron's legacy; By rebranding itself as a movement, not a party, Ukip would become a virus that could destroy moderate Conservatism Matthew Parris 'I 've got a weird feeling," Arron Banks told The Times's Lucy Fisher before the EU referendum campaign began, "that British politics will be realigned after the referendum." The Farage-funding tycoon's thoughts are worth noting. A sort of Holy Fool of the Ukip establishment, Mr Banks seems careless whether what he says hurts or helps in the daily grind, yet his reasoning often cuts through the froth. You can, for instance, imagine Leave spin doctors wincing this week at Banks's remark that George Osborne's "£4,300 per household" cost of Brexit would be a "bargain basement" price for regaining our sovereignty - yet there was a deep truth in it. Unless the Leave campaign are able to summon up a St Crispin's day vision of a prize beyond monetary calculation, they are doomed. They are about nationhood or they are nothing. So when Mr Banks said he thought the referendum would shake up our party politics so violently that the pieces would never fit back together into the old shapes, I believe he was on to a story for the 21st-century history books. Emerging among the senior ranks of the UK Independence Party is an as yet half-formed idea. "We're kicking this around," someone from these ranks told me yesterday, and the hint was clear: the exercise is serious, and should be watched nervously by Tories who hanker for a return to the old party monoliths.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of the 238 Most Respected Journalists, As Nominated by Journalists in the 2018 Journalists at Work Survey
    A list of the 238 most respected journalists, as nominated by journalists in the 2018 Journalists at Work survey Fran Abrams BBC Radio 4 & The Guardian Seth Abramson Freelance investigative journalist Kate Adie BBC Katya Adler BBC Europe Jonathan Ali BBC Christiane Amanpour CNN Lynn Ashwell Formerly Bolton News Mary-Ann Astle Stoke on Trent Live Michael Atherton The Times and Sky Sports Sue Austin Shropshire Star Caroline Barber CN Group Lionel Barber Financial Times Emma Barnett BBC Radio 5 Live Francis Beckett Author & journalist Vanessa Beeley Blogger Jessica Bennett New York Times Heidi Blake BuzzFeed David Blevins Sky News Ian Bolton Sky Sports News Susie Boniface Daily Mirror Samantha Booth Islington Tribune Jeremy Bowen BBC Tom Bradby ITV Peter Bradshaw The Guardian Suzanne Breen Belfast Telegraph Billy Briggs Freelance Tom Bristow Archant investigations unit Samuel Brittan Financial Times David Brown The Times Fiona Bruce BBC Michael Buchanan BBC Jason Burt Daily Telegraph & Sunday Telegraph Carole Cadwalladr The Observer & The Guardian Andy Cairns Sky Sports News Michael Calvin Author Duncan Campbell Investigative journalist and author Severin Carrell The Guardian Reeta Chakrabarti BBC Aditya Chakrabortty The Guardian Jeremy Clarkson Broadcaster, The Times & Sunday Times Matthew Clemenson Ilford Recorder and Romford Recorder Michelle Clifford Sky News Patrick Cockburn The Independent Nick Cohen Columnist Teilo Colley Press Association David Conn The Guardian Richard Conway BBC Rob Cotterill The Sentinel, Staffordshire Alex Crawford
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of ISIS and Islamophobia in the UK
    Report The Rise of ISIS and Islamophobia in the UK Alison Pargeter* Al Jazeera Centre for Studies Tel: +974-40158384 24 August 2015 [email protected] http://studies.aljazeera.n Muslims attend Friday prayers on a rainy first day of Ramadan in East London [Reuters] Abstract The massacre of 38 tourists on a beach in Sousse on 26 June 2015 sent shockwaves around Europe, bringing the threat of militant groups operating in North Africa ever closer to home. However, given that the majority of the dead were British, the atrocity had a special resonance in the United Kingdom, stoking fears of a possible ISIS attack on British soil. The massacre also prompted renewed questions about Britain’s own Muslim communities and provoked an outpouring of anti-Muslim sentiment in some parts of the British media, reflecting a general growing unease in the UK about its Muslim population. Indeed, the emergence of ISIS has been accompanied by a tangible rise in anti-Muslim prejudice in the UK, with Muslims being called upon to come forward and condemn extremism as though they are somehow guilty by association of their faith alone. However, it is at the policy level that the response to the growth of ISIS is perhaps most concerning. New counter terrorism legislation introduced by the British government in 2015 has brought in invasive new surveillance measures across Britain’s public sector, injecting a suspicion about Muslims into every part of public life. All this is serving to make many Muslims in the UK feel increasingly as though they are a community under siege.
    [Show full text]