DOCSLIB.ORG

Fundamentals of Pharmacology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fundamentals of Pharmacology VM522P / VM7522 Pharmacology WIMU Fall WIMU Regional Program in Veterinary Medicine Fundamentals of Pharmacology VM522P, VM7522 Handouts of Pharmacology Lectures by Washington State University and Utah State University faculty, Drs. Suzy Appleyard, Steve Simasko, Nicolas Villarino, Mirella Meyer‐Ficca, and Ralph Meyer 1 VM522P / VM7522 Pharmacology WIMU Fall Table of Contents PART1 – Pharmacodynamics (S. Appleyard) .................................................................................................................5 L1: PHARMACODYNAMICS – TARGETS ......................................................................................................................5 I. Specific Drug Targets .....................................................................................................................................5 II. Non‐targeted mechanisms ............................................................................................................................9 L2: PHARMACODYNAMICS – RECEPTOR ‐ DRUG INTERACTIONS ........................................................................... 10 I. Drug‐Receptor Interactions – General Concepts ....................................................................................... 11 II. Measurement of Binding Affinity ............................................................................................................... 12 III. Measurement of Effective Concentration. ............................................................................................. 13 IV. Relationship between binding and effect .............................................................................................. 14 V. Potency ....................................................................................................................................................... 16 VI. Selectivity: The Structure‐Activity Relationship .......................................................................................... 17 L3: PHARMACODYNAMICS – AGONISTS AND ANTAGONISTS ................................................................................ 19 I. Receptors .................................................................................................................................................... 19 II. Agonists ...................................................................................................................................................... 19 III. Antagonists ............................................................................................................................................. 20 IV. Partial agonists ....................................................................................................................................... 23 L4: POPULATION PHARMACOLOGY ....................................................................................................................... 26 I. Quantal Dose‐Response Curves ................................................................................................................. 26 II. Therapeutic Index (TI) ................................................................................................................................ 27 III. LD50 ........................................................................................................................................................ 28 IV. Adverse Reactions .................................................................................................................................. 29 PART2 – Pharmacokinetics (S. Simasko) .................................................................................................................... 32 L5: Absorption ........................................................................................................................................................ 32 L6: Pharmacokinetics: Distribution ........................................................................................................................ 39 L7: Pharmacokinetics: Metabolism ........................................................................................................................ 44 L8: Pharmacokinetics: Excretion ............................................................................................................................ 53 L9: Pharmacokinetic Models .................................................................................................................................. 59 A. One‐Compartment Open Model .................................................................................................................... 59 B. Two‐Compartment Open Model .................................................................................................................... 63 C. Multi‐Compartment Models .......................................................................................................................... 66 L10‐12: Pharmacokinetic Variables ........................................................................................................................ 68 a) Clearance ........................................................................................................................................................ 69 b) Volume of Distribution ................................................................................................................................... 70 c) Bioavailability ................................................................................................................................................. 71 d) Half‐life ........................................................................................................................................................... 73 2 VM522P / VM7522 Pharmacology WIMU Fall L13: Dosing regimens ‐ Infusions ............................................................................................................................ 74 L14: Dosing regimens – Intermittent dosing .......................................................................................................... 82 L15: TOLERANCE AND DRUG INTERACTIONS ......................................................................................................... 94 I. Tolerance .................................................................................................................................................... 94 II. Drug‐Drug Interactions ............................................................................................................................... 96 L16: Pharmacokinetics: Adjustments ..................................................................................................................... 99 L16: Clinical Pharmacokinetics ............................................................................................................................. 105 Drug label or package ........................................................................................................................................... 105 Drug label or package: sections ........................................................................................................................... 105 PK section of the label .......................................................................................................................................... 105 Labels are specific for products and formulations ............................................................................................... 105 How to use/interpret a PK section? ..................................................................................................................... 105 Specific pharmacokinetic parameters .................................................................................................................. 107 List of key works for interpreting labels ........................................................................................................... 109 Part 3 – Neuropharmacology (S. Appleyard) ............................................................................................................ 110 L17: Review of Neurotransmission ....................................................................................................................... 110 I. Steps in Neurotransmission ..................................................................................................................... 111 II. Examples of how drugs modulate Neurotransmission ............................................................................ 115 III. Modulation of Neurotransmission ...................................................................................................... 117 L18: Overview of the Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) .................................................................................... 120 I. Divisions and Structure of the ANS .......................................................................................................... 121 II. Chemical Mediators and Receptors within the ANS ................................................................................ 125 III. Function of the ANS .............................................................................................................................. 129 IV. Somatic efferent nervous system (motor neurons) ............................................................................ 131 L19, 20: Cholinergic Pharmacology .....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1: Clinical Pharmacokinetics 1
    1: CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS 1 General overview: clinical pharmacokinetics, 2 Pharmacokinetics, 4 Drug clearance (CL), 6 Volume of distribution (Vd), 8 The half-life (t½), 10 Oral availability (F), 12 Protein binding (PB), 14 pH and pharmacokinetics, 16 1 Clinical pharmacokinetics General overview General overview: clinical pharmacokinetics 1 The ultimate aim of drug therapy is to achieve effi cacy without toxicity. This involves achieving a plasma concentration (Cp) within the ‘therapeutic window’, i.e. above the min- imal effective concentration (MEC), but below the minimal toxic concentration (MTC). Clinical pharmacokinetics is about all the factors that determine variability in the Cp and its time-course. The various factors are dealt with in subsequent chapters. Ideal therapeutics: effi cacy without toxicity Minimum Toxic Concentration (MTC) Ideal dosing Minimum Effective Concentration (MEC) Drug concentration Time The graph shows a continuous IV infusion at steady state, where the dose-rate is exactly appropriate for the patient’s clearance (CL). Inappropriate dosing Dosing too high in relation to the patient’s CL – toxicity likely Minimum Toxic Concentration (MTC) Minimum Effective Concentration (MEC) Dosing too low in relation to the Drug concentration patient’s CL – drug may be ineffective Time Some reasons for variation in CL Low CL High CL Normal variation Normal variation Renal impairment Increased renal blood fl ow Genetic poor metabolism Genetic hypermetabolism Liver impairment Enzyme induction Enzyme inhibition Old age/neonate 2 General overview Clinical Pharmacokinetics Pharmacokinetic factors determining ideal therapeutics If immediate effect is needed, a loading dose (LD) must be given to achieve a desired 1 concentration. The LD is determined by the volume of distribution (Vd).
    [Show full text]
  • Narrow Therapeutic Index
    Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Some drugs have a narrow therapeutic index, which means that there is only a small difference between the minimum effective concentrations and the minimum toxic concentrations in the blood. With such drugs, small increases in dose or in blood/serum concentrations could lead to toxic effects. Therapeutic drug monitoring may help to optimise treatment in cases where there is a firm relationship between the toxic/therapeutic effects and drug concentrations in whole blood/serum. A therapeutic interval has been defined for the drugs in the following tables. This is the minimum effective and maximum safe concentration for compliant patients, on stabilised regimens. Levels within these limits should prove satisfactory in most cases. Whole blood or serum drug concentrations are useful for determining patient compliance or for assessing whether or not: 1. adequate concentrations are being achieved or, 2. potentially toxic concentrations are being reached. Depending on clinical conditions, dosage adjustments may be needed when levels are outside the therapeutic interval. Therapeutic drug monitoring can also be useful when changes are made to other medications that could affect serum or whole blood concentrations and lead to a reduction in effectiveness or increased toxicity. Although plasma drug concentrations and the therapeutic interval are useful in evaluating drug therapy, they should not be the only criteria on which treatment is based. Always remember to treat the patient, not the level. Drug concentrations in serum or whole blood are only meaningful if the correct procedures are followed regarding the timing of specimens and selection of sample tube. It is vitally important to note the exact time the sample is taken and when each dose of the drug is given.
    [Show full text]
  • Narrow Therapeutic Index Drugs: a Clinical Pharmacological Consideration to Flecainide Juan Tamargo, Jean-Yves Le Heuzey, Phillipe Mabo
    Narrow therapeutic index drugs: a clinical pharmacological consideration to flecainide Juan Tamargo, Jean-Yves Le Heuzey, Phillipe Mabo To cite this version: Juan Tamargo, Jean-Yves Le Heuzey, Phillipe Mabo. Narrow therapeutic index drugs: a clinical pharmacological consideration to flecainide. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Springer Verlag, 2015, 71 (5), pp.549-567. 10.1007/s00228-015-1832-0. hal-01143095 HAL Id: hal-01143095 https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01143095 Submitted on 16 Apr 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Eur J Clin Pharmacol (2015) 71:549–567 DOI 10.1007/s00228-015-1832-0 REVIEW ARTICLE Narrow therapeutic index drugs: a clinical pharmacological consideration to flecainide Juan Tamargo & Jean-Yves Le Heuzey & Phillipe Mabo Received: 5 December 2014 /Accepted: 4 March 2015 /Published online: 15 April 2015 # The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract specify flecainide as an NTID. The literature review demon- Purpose The therapeutic index (TI) is the range of doses at strated that flecainide displays NTID characteristics including which a medication is effective without unacceptable adverse a steep drug dose–response relationship for safety and effica- events.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacogenetic Testing: a Tool for Personalized Drug Therapy Optimization
    pharmaceutics Review Pharmacogenetic Testing: A Tool for Personalized Drug Therapy Optimization Kristina A. Malsagova 1,* , Tatyana V. Butkova 1 , Arthur T. Kopylov 1 , Alexander A. Izotov 1, Natalia V. Potoldykova 2, Dmitry V. Enikeev 2, Vagarshak Grigoryan 2, Alexander Tarasov 3, Alexander A. Stepanov 1 and Anna L. Kaysheva 1 1 Biobanking Group, Branch of Institute of Biomedical Chemistry “Scientific and Education Center”, 109028 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] (T.V.B.); [email protected] (A.T.K.); [email protected] (A.A.I.); [email protected] (A.A.S.); [email protected] (A.L.K.) 2 Institute of Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119992 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] (N.V.P.); [email protected] (D.V.E.); [email protected] (V.G.) 3 Institute of Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, Sechenov University, 119992 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +7-499-764-9878 Received: 2 November 2020; Accepted: 17 December 2020; Published: 19 December 2020 Abstract: Pharmacogenomics is a study of how the genome background is associated with drug resistance and how therapy strategy can be modified for a certain person to achieve benefit. The pharmacogenomics (PGx) testing becomes of great opportunity for physicians to make the proper decision regarding each non-trivial patient that does not respond to therapy. Although pharmacogenomics has become of growing interest to the healthcare market during the past five to ten years the exact mechanisms linking the genetic polymorphisms and observable responses to drug therapy are not always clear. Therefore, the success of PGx testing depends on the physician’s ability to understand the obtained results in a standardized way for each particular patient.
    [Show full text]
  • Narrow Therapeutic Index Drugs
    Quality and Bioequivalence Standards for Narrow Therapeutic Index Drugs Lawrence X. Yu, Ph.D. Deputy Director for Science and Chemistry Office of Generic Drugs Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food and Drug Administration GPhA 2011 Fall Technical Workshop 1 Bioequivalence • The absence of a significant difference in the rate and extent to which the active ingredient or active moiety in pharmaceutical equivalents or pharmaceutical alternatives becomes available at the site of drug action when administrated at the same molar dose under similar conditions in an appropriately designed study…” (21 CFR §320.1) 2 Plasma Concentration Profile Cmax 10000 AUC ln Concentration 1000 Concentration Time Tmax - time of maximum concentration 100 Time 3 0 5 10 15 20 25 Possible Outcome of BE Studies Demonstrate BE Fail to Demonstrate BIE Fail to Demonstrate BE Demonstrate BIE Demonstrate BIE 80% T/R (%) 125% 4 5 FDA 12 Year BE Data Distribution of AUCt Ratios Average difference = 3.56% 10 N = 2069 8 6 Percent of Total(%) of Percent 4 2 0 0.84 0.86 0.88 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1.00 1.02 1.04 1.06 1.08 1.10 1.12 1.14 1.16 1.18 1.20 6 AUC Point Estimate (T/R) Effect of Variability on BE Studies High variability 80% T/R (%) 125% 7 Development of BE Standard for Highly Variable Drugs 4/2004 First presentation to the FDA Advisory Committee 10/2006 Second presentation to the FDA Advisory Committee 3/2007 Received the first ANDA which used the new FDA BE approach 5/2007 Critical Path Opportunities for Generic Drugs BE of HVD 1/2008 FDA OGD’s first publication on BE of HVD (Pharm.
    [Show full text]
  • In Vitro Pharmacology of Clinically Used Central Nervous System-Active Drugs As Inverse H1 Receptor Agonists
    0022-3565/07/3221-172–179$20.00 THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS Vol. 322, No. 1 Copyright © 2007 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 118869/3215703 JPET 322:172–179, 2007 Printed in U.S.A. In Vitro Pharmacology of Clinically Used Central Nervous System-Active Drugs as Inverse H1 Receptor Agonists R. A. Bakker,1 M. W. Nicholas,2 T. T. Smith, E. S. Burstein, U. Hacksell, H. Timmerman, R. Leurs, M. R. Brann, and D. M. Weiner Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (R.A.B., H.T., R.L.); ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc., San Diego, California (R.A.B., M.W.N., T.T.S., E.S.B., U.H., M.R.B., D.M.W.); and Departments of Pharmacology (M.R.B.), Neurosciences (D.M.W.), and Psychiatry (D.M.W.), University of California, San Diego, California Received January 2, 2007; accepted March 30, 2007 Downloaded from ABSTRACT The human histamine H1 receptor (H1R) is a prototypical G on this screen, we have reported on the identification of 8R- protein-coupled receptor and an important, well characterized lisuride as a potent stereospecific partial H1R agonist (Mol target for the development of antagonists to treat allergic con- Pharmacol 65:538–549, 2004). In contrast, herein we report on jpet.aspetjournals.org ditions. Many neuropsychiatric drugs are also known to po- a large number of varied clinical and chemical classes of drugs tently antagonize this receptor, underlying aspects of their side that are active in the central nervous system that display potent effect profiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Warfarin Sodium
    Contains Nonbinding Recommendations Draft Guidance on Warfarin Sodium This draft guidance, once finalized, will represent the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) current thinking on this topic. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if the approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. If you want to discuss an alternative approach, contact the Office of Generic Drugs. Active ingredient: Warfarin Sodium Form/Route: Tablet/Oral Recommended studies: 2 studies 1. Type of study: Fasting Design: 4-way, fully replicated crossover design in-vivo Strength: 10 mg Subjects: Healthy males and nonpregnant females, general population. Additional Comments: Warfarin has a long terminal elimination half-life. Please ensure adequate washout periods between treatments in the crossover studies. For long half-life drug products, an AUC truncated to 72 hours may be used in place of AUC0-t or AUC0-∞, as described in the Guidance for Industry: “Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Orally Administered Drug Products – General Considerations”. Applicants may consider using the reference-scaled average bioequivalence approach for warfarin described below. 2. Type of study: Fed Design: 4-way, fully replicated crossover design in-vivo Strength: 10 mg Subjects: Healthy males and nonpregnant females, general population. Additional Comments: See additional comments above. See Amantadine Hydrochloride Oral Tablet guidance
    [Show full text]
  • G Protein-Coupled Receptors
    S.P.H. Alexander et al. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16: G protein-coupled receptors. British Journal of Pharmacology (2015) 172, 5744–5869 THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16: G protein-coupled receptors Stephen PH Alexander1, Anthony P Davenport2, Eamonn Kelly3, Neil Marrion3, John A Peters4, Helen E Benson5, Elena Faccenda5, Adam J Pawson5, Joanna L Sharman5, Christopher Southan5, Jamie A Davies5 and CGTP Collaborators 1School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK, 2Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK, 3School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK, 4Neuroscience Division, Medical Education Institute, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK, 5Centre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK Abstract The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16 provides concise overviews of the key properties of over 1750 human drug targets with their pharmacology, plus links to an open access knowledgebase of drug targets and their ligands (www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties. The full contents can be found at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ 10.1111/bph.13348/full. G protein-coupled receptors are one of the eight major pharmacological targets into which the Guide is divided, with the others being: ligand-gated ion channels, voltage-gated ion channels, other ion channels, nuclear hormone receptors, catalytic receptors, enzymes and transporters. These are presented with nomenclature guidance and summary information on the best available pharmacological tools, alongside key references and suggestions for further reading.
    [Show full text]
  • International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. XCVIII. Histamine Receptors
    1521-0081/67/3/601–655$25.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/pr.114.010249 PHARMACOLOGICAL REVIEWS Pharmacol Rev 67:601–655, July 2015 Copyright © 2015 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics ASSOCIATE EDITOR: ELIOT H. OHLSTEIN International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. XCVIII. Histamine Receptors Pertti Panula, Paul L. Chazot, Marlon Cowart, Ralf Gutzmer, Rob Leurs, Wai L. S. Liu, Holger Stark, Robin L. Thurmond, and Helmut L. Haas Department of Anatomy, and Neuroscience Center, University of Helsinki, Finland (P.P.); School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Durham, United Kingdom (P.L.C.); AbbVie, Inc. North Chicago, Illinois (M.C.); Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany (R.G.); Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Amsterdam Institute of Molecules, Medicines and Systems, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands (R.L.); Ziarco Pharma Limited, Canterbury, United Kingdom (W.L.S.L.); Institute of Pharmaceutical and Medical Chemistry (H.S.) and Institute of Neurophysiology, Medical Faculty (H.L.H.), Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Germany; and Janssen Research & Development, LLC, San Diego, California (R.L.T.) Abstract ....................................................................................602 Downloaded from I. Introduction and Historical Perspective .....................................................602 II. Histamine H1 Receptor . ..................................................................604 A. Receptor Structure
    [Show full text]
  • Anew Drug Design Strategy in the Liht of Molecular Hybridization Concept
    www.ijcrt.org © 2020 IJCRT | Volume 8, Issue 12 December 2020 | ISSN: 2320-2882 “Drug Design strategy and chemical process maximization in the light of Molecular Hybridization Concept.” Subhasis Basu, Ph D Registration No: VB 1198 of 2018-2019. Department Of Chemistry, Visva-Bharati University A Draft Thesis is submitted for the partial fulfilment of PhD in Chemistry Thesis/Degree proceeding. DECLARATION I Certify that a. The Work contained in this thesis is original and has been done by me under the guidance of my supervisor. b. The work has not been submitted to any other Institute for any degree or diploma. c. I have followed the guidelines provided by the Institute in preparing the thesis. d. I have conformed to the norms and guidelines given in the Ethical Code of Conduct of the Institute. e. Whenever I have used materials (data, theoretical analysis, figures and text) from other sources, I have given due credit to them by citing them in the text of the thesis and giving their details in the references. Further, I have taken permission from the copyright owners of the sources, whenever necessary. IJCRT2012039 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org 284 www.ijcrt.org © 2020 IJCRT | Volume 8, Issue 12 December 2020 | ISSN: 2320-2882 f. Whenever I have quoted written materials from other sources I have put them under quotation marks and given due credit to the sources by citing them and giving required details in the references. (Subhasis Basu) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This preface is to extend an appreciation to all those individuals who with their generous co- operation guided us in every aspect to make this design and drawing successful.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance for Industry: Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies For
    Guidance for Industry Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Orally Administered Drug Products — General Considerations DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Comments and suggestions regarding this draft document should be submitted within 30 days of publication in the Federal Register of the notice announcing the availability of the draft guidance. Submit comments to Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket number listed in the notice of availability that publishes in the Federal Register. For questions regarding this draft document contact (CDER) Aida Sanchez 301-827-5847. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) July 2002 BP J:\!GUIDANC\4964dft.doc 07/10/02 Guidance for Industry Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Orally Administered Drug Products — General Considerations Additional copies are available from: Office of Training and Communication Division of Drug Information, HFD-240 Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food and Drug Administration 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 (Tel) 301-827-4573 http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/index.htm U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) July 2002 BP J:\!GUIDANC\4964dft.doc 07/10/02 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroscience Products
    Neuroscience Products CATALOG CATALOG NUMBER U.S. $ NUMBER U.S. $ -A- 3-(N-ACETYLAMINO)-5-(N-DECYL-N- 1 mg 27.50 159549 METHYLAMINO)BENZYL ALCOHOL 5 mg 89.40 o A23187 0-5 C [103955-90-4] (ADMB) See: Antibiotic A23187 A Protein Kinase C activator. Ref.: Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 83, 4214 AA-861 20 mg 72.70 (1986). 159061 Purity: 95% 100 mg 326.40 C20H34N2O2 MW 334.5 0oC Orally active, specific and potent inhibitor of 5-lipoxygenase. N-ACETYL-ASP-GLU 25 mg 45.00 153036 [3106-85-2] 100 mg 156.00 Ref.: 1. Yoshimoto, T., et.al., Biochim. o Biophys. Acta, 713, 470 (1982). 2. Ashida, -20-0 C An endogenous neuropeptide with high 250 mg 303.65 Y., et.al., Prostaglandins, 26, 955 (1983). 3. affinity for a brain "Glutamate" receptor. Ancill, R.J., et.al., J. Int. Med. Res., 18, 75 Ref: Zaczek, R., et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. (1990). Sci. (USA), 80, 1116 (1983). C21H26O3 MW 326.4 C11H16N2O8 MW 304.3 ABL PROTEIN TYROSINE KINASE 250 U 47.25 N-ACETYL-2-BENZYLTRYPTAMINE 195876 (v-abl) 1 KU 162.75 See: Luzindole -70oC Recombinant Expressed in E. coli ACETYL-DL-CARNITINE 250 mg 60.00 A truncated form of the v-abl protein 154690 [2504-11-2] 1 g 214.00 tyrosine kinase which contains the 0oC Hydrochloride minimum region needed for kinase activity Crystalline and fibroblast transformation. Suppresses C9H17NO4 • HCl MW 239.7 apoptosis and induces resistance to anti-cancer compounds. O-ACETYL-L-CARNITINE CHLORIDE 500 mg 11.45 Activity: 100 KU/ml 159062 [5080-50-2] 1 g 20.65 Unit Definition: one unit is the amount of 0-5oC (R-(-)-2-Acetyloxy-3-carboxy-N,N,N-trimethyl 5 g 97.45 enzyme which catalyzes the transfer of 1 -1-propanaminium chloride) pmol of phosphate to EAIYAAPFAKKK per Purity: >88% minute at 30°C, pH 7.5.
    [Show full text]