DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2008.11745V1 [Astro-Ph.SR]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2008.11745V1 [Astro-Ph.SR] Draft version August 28, 2020 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63 Near-infrared Census of RR Lyrae variables in the Messier 3 globular cluster and the Period–Luminosity Relations Anupam Bhardwaj,1, ∗ Marina Rejkuba,2 Richard de Grijs,3,4,5 Gregory J. Herczeg,1 Harinder P. Singh,6 Shashi Kanbur,7 and Chow-Choong Ngeow8 1Kavli Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Peking University, Yi He Yuan Lu 5, Hai Dian District, Beijing 100871, China 2European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Straße 2, 85748, Garching, Germany 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, Macquarie University, Balaclava Road, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia 4Research Centre for Astronomy, Astrophysics and Astrophotonics, Macquarie University, Balaclava Road, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia 5International Space Science Institute – Beijing, 1 Nanertiao, Zhongguancun, Hai Dian District, Beijing 100190, China 6Department of Physics and Astrophysics, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007, India 7State University of New York, Oswego, NY 13126, USA 8Graduate Institute of Astronomy, National Central University, 300 Jhongda Road, 32001 Jhongli, Taiwan (Received 31 July 2020; Revised August 28, 2020; Accepted August 28, 2020) Submitted to AJ ABSTRACT We present new near-infrared (JHKs) time-series observations of RR Lyrae variables in the Messier 3 (NGC 5272) globular cluster using the WIRCam instrument at the 3.6-m Canada France Hawaii Telescope. Our observations cover a sky area of ∼ 21′ × 21′ around the cluster center and provide an average of twenty epochs of homogeneous JHKs-band photometry. New homogeneous photometry is used to estimate robust mean magnitudes for 175 fundamental-mode (RRab), 47 overtone-mode (RRc), and 11 mixed-mode (RRd) variables. Our sample of 233 RR Lyrae variables is the largest thus far obtained in a single cluster with time-resolved, multi-band near-infrared photometry. Near-infrared to optical amplitude ratios for RR Lyrae in Messier 3 exhibit a systematic increase moving from RRc to short-period (P < 0.6 days) and long-period (P & 0.6 days) RRab variables. We derive JHKs-band Period–Luminosity relations for RRab, RRc, and the combined sample of variables. Absolute calibrations based on the theoretically predicted Period–Luminosity–Metallicity relations for RR Lyrae stars yield a distance modulus, µ = 15.041 ± 0.017 (statistical) ± 0.036 (systematic) mag, to Messier 3. When anchored to trigonometric parallaxes for nearby RR Lyrae stars from the Hubble Space Telescope and the Gaia mission, our distance estimates are consistent with those resulting from the theoretical calibrations, albeit with relatively larger systematic uncertainties. 1. INTRODUCTION metallicity relation with negligible dependence on pulsa- RR Lyrae (RRL) variables are low-mass (0.5 . tion periods unlike classical Cepheids (Bono et al.2003). arXiv:2008.11745v1 [astro-ph.SR] 26 Aug 2020 The reason for this different behavior is that the bolo- M/M ⊙ . 0.8), old (> 10 Gyr) stars that are located in a region between the cross-section of the horizontal branch metric correction’s sensitivity to effective temperature and the classical “instability strip” in the Hertzsprung– becomes significant only at longer wavelengths (R-band Russell diagram. These horizontal branch stars pulsate onwards, Catelan et al. 2004). Indeed, RRL exhibit well during their central helium burning evolutionary phase, defined Period–Luminosity relations (PLRs) at infrared wavelengths, first demonstrated in pioneering work by similar to intermediate-mass (3 . M/M ⊙ . 10) classi- cal Cepheids. RRL follow a visual (V -band) magnitude– Longmore et al. (1986), which makes them excellent dis- tance indicators (see recent reviews, Beaton et al. 2018; Bhardwaj 2020). RRL play a key role in our understand- Corresponding author: Anupam Bhardwaj ing of stellar evolution and pulsation (Catelan 2009), [email protected]; [email protected] and as stellar population tracers for Galactic archaeol- ∗ IAU Gruber Foundation Fellow 2020 2 Bhardwaj A. et al. ogy and the cosmic distance scale (Kunder et al. 2018; models, Denissenkov et al. (2017) found a good agree- Beaton et al. 2018). ment with observed properties of RRL and non-variable Globular clusters (GCs) typically host a rich and ho- horizontal branch stars for a distance modulus and red- mogeneous population of RRL stars. Messier 3 (M3 dening of µ = 15.02 mag and E(B − V )=0.013 mag, or NGC 5272), located at a distance of ∼ 10 kpc, respectively. hosts one of the largest samples of RRL with a domi- RRL as distance indicators have gained signif- nant population of fundamental mode RRL (RRab) vari- icance with increasing NIR observations especially ables (Clement et al. 2001). M3 has a mean metallicity in GCs (Sollima et al. 2006; Coppola et al. 2011; of [Fe/H]∼ −1.5 dex (Harris 2010) and the observed Stetson et al. 2014; Braga et al. 2015; Navarrete et al. period distribution of its RRL population exhibits a 2015; Braga et al. 2018). These horizontal branch vari- sharp peak at fundamental pulsator period of 0.55 day ables can complement the tip of the red giant branch (Jurcsik et al. 2017), indicating that it is a typical stars to provide an absolute primary calibration for the Oosterhoff I type (OoI, Oosterhoff 1939; Fabrizio et al. population II distance ladder (Beaton et al. 2016). The 2019) cluster. While multiple stellar populations have homogeneous population of RRL in different GCs offers been detected along the red giant branch of M3 (e.g., the possibility to derive their PLRs and estimate the Massari et al. 2016; Lee & Sneden 2020), no signifi- dependence on metal abundance (Sollima et al. 2006). cant variation has been detected in the iron abundance While theoretical models predict a significant metallicity (Sneden et al. 2004). Furthermore, helium enhancement coefficient of the RRL Period–Luminosity–Metallicity (∆Y . 0.02) has been suggested to explain observed (PLZ) relation (e.g., Catelan et al. 2004; Marconi et al. properties of horizontal branch stars (Dalessandro et al. 2015), it is still a topic of active debate considering 2013; Valcarce et al. 2016; Denissenkov et al. 2017). the paucity of RRL with both high-resolution spectro- Insignificant interstellar reddening (VandenBerg et al. scopic metallicities and precise parallaxes suitable to es- 2016) and the close proximity of M3 motivated sev- tablish an empirical calibration (Muraveva et al. 2018; eral detailed long-term photometric investigations at Neeley et al. 2019; Bhardwaj 2020). Therefore, NIR ob- optical wavelengths (Bakos et al. 2000; Cacciari et al. servations of abundant RRL in M3 will not only be use- 2005; Benko 2006; Jurcsik et al. 2012, 2017, and ref- ful for studies of the distance scale but also complement erences therein). Optical photometry has been used optical and ultraviolet data for a rigorous comparison to investigate the Blazhko effect, multimode pulsations with evolutionary and pulsation models. and period doubling in M3 RRL variables (Jurcsik et al. In this work, we present NIR time-series observations 2015; Jurcsik 2019). The RRL population in M3 clus- of RRL in M3 for the largest sample of variables in an ter has also been explored at ultraviolet wavelengths individual GC. The paper is organized as follows. In Sec- (Siegel et al. 2015). At near-infrared (NIR) wave- tion 2, we describe the observations, the data reduction lengths, Longmore et al. (1990) derived Ks-band PLRs and the photometric calibrations. The NIR light curves for RRL in GCs including 49 variables in the outer re- and pulsation properties of the RRL are discussed in gion of M3. Apart from that, NIR photometry of RRL Section 3. We discuss the JHKs-band PLRs for M3 in M3 has been limited to a sample of 7 RRL in the RRL in Section 4 and estimate a robust distance to the inner region of the cluster (Butler 2003). cluster. The results are summarized in Section 5. M3 has been the subject of several theoretical stud- ies aimed at reproducing the observed pulsation prop- 2. OBSERVATIONS, DATA REDUCTION, AND erties and, in particular, the period distribution of PHOTOMETRIC CALIBRATION its RRL population (Catelan 2004; Castellani et al. 2.1. Observations and data reduction 2005; Fadeyev 2019). Catelan (2004) showed that Our NIR observations were obtained using the the predicted period distribution based on canon- WIRCam instrument (Puget et al. 2004) mounted on ical horizontal branch models is inconsistent with the 3.6-m Canada France Hawaii Telescope (CFHT) on observations, while Castellani et al. (2005) suggested the summit of Mauna Kea in Hawaii during 4 nights be- that a bimodal mass distribution would be required tween 26 and 29 May 2019. WIRcam is an array of four to reproduce the period distribution with canoni- 2048 × 2048 HgCdTe HAWAII-RG2 detectors arranged cal models. Marconi & Degl’Innocenti (2007) accu- in 2 × 2 grid with gaps of 45′′ between adjacent detec- rately modeled optical light curves of M3 RRL using tors. The pixel scale of each detector is 0.3′′ pixel−1 nonlinear pulsation models with [Fe/H]∼ −1.34 dex resulting in a field of view of ∼ 21′ × 21′. We requested (Carretta & Gratton 1997), and estimated a distance JHKs time-series observations in queue mode centered modulus of 15.10 ± 0.10 mag. Using horizontal branch on the M3 cluster center, and obtained 22 epochs in J JHKs observations of RR Lyrae stars in M3 3 Table 1. Log of NIR observations. J-band H-band Ks-band Date MJD Airmass IQ Nf MJD Airmass IQ Nf MJD Airmass IQ Nf ET days arcsec days arcsec days arcsec sec 2019-05-26 58629.2882
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Messier Objects
    Messier Objects From the Stocker Astroscience Center at Florida International University Miami Florida The Messier Project Main contributors: • Daniel Puentes • Steven Revesz • Bobby Martinez Charles Messier • Gabriel Salazar • Riya Gandhi • Dr. James Webb – Director, Stocker Astroscience center • All images reduced and combined using MIRA image processing software. (Mirametrics) What are Messier Objects? • Messier objects are a list of astronomical sources compiled by Charles Messier, an 18th and early 19th century astronomer. He created a list of distracting objects to avoid while comet hunting. This list now contains over 110 objects, many of which are the most famous astronomical bodies known. The list contains planetary nebula, star clusters, and other galaxies. - Bobby Martinez The Telescope The telescope used to take these images is an Astronomical Consultants and Equipment (ACE) 24- inch (0.61-meter) Ritchey-Chretien reflecting telescope. It has a focal ratio of F6.2 and is supported on a structure independent of the building that houses it. It is equipped with a Finger Lakes 1kx1k CCD camera cooled to -30o C at the Cassegrain focus. It is equipped with dual filter wheels, the first containing UBVRI scientific filters and the second RGBL color filters. Messier 1 Found 6,500 light years away in the constellation of Taurus, the Crab Nebula (known as M1) is a supernova remnant. The original supernova that formed the crab nebula was observed by Chinese, Japanese and Arab astronomers in 1054 AD as an incredibly bright “Guest star” which was visible for over twenty-two months. The supernova that produced the Crab Nebula is thought to have been an evolved star roughly ten times more massive than the Sun.
    [Show full text]
  • Rules & Requirements for an SBAS Observing Certificate 1. You Must
    Rules & Requirements for an SBAS Observing Certificate 1. You must be a member of the SBAS in good standing to receive a certificate. 2. No Go To or Push To aided attempts will be accepted. Reading charts and star hopping are essential skills in our hobby. (You may use these methods to confirm your findings.) 3. Honor system is in full effect. These lists benefit your knowledge of the sky. Cheating only cheats yourself and the SBAS membership. Observations will be verified against digital planetarium charts. You may be required to answer questions about the objects you observed to verify your work. You may also be asked to show one of these objects at a star party. Once a list is completed, it is assumed you are familiar with every object on that list to the point where you can find it again and describe it to another person. 4. Upon completion of a list, submit the original paper version in person to Coy Wagoner at an SBAS meeting, public star party, or informal observing at the Worley. No digital submissions will be accepted at this time. 5. No observations may overlap. If one object is on two lists, your observations must be done on separate dates/times for credit. Copies of your observing logs will be saved and later compared to additional lists to make sure nothing overlaps. No observations prior to January 1, 2015 will be accepted for credit. 6. Observations should be done on your own. If you observe an object in someone else’s telescope or binoculars, the observation does not count unless you did the work to find it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Messier Catalog
    The Messier Catalog Messier 1 Messier 2 Messier 3 Messier 4 Messier 5 Crab Nebula globular cluster globular cluster globular cluster globular cluster Messier 6 Messier 7 Messier 8 Messier 9 Messier 10 open cluster open cluster Lagoon Nebula globular cluster globular cluster Butterfly Cluster Ptolemy's Cluster Messier 11 Messier 12 Messier 13 Messier 14 Messier 15 Wild Duck Cluster globular cluster Hercules glob luster globular cluster globular cluster Messier 16 Messier 17 Messier 18 Messier 19 Messier 20 Eagle Nebula The Omega, Swan, open cluster globular cluster Trifid Nebula or Horseshoe Nebula Messier 21 Messier 22 Messier 23 Messier 24 Messier 25 open cluster globular cluster open cluster Milky Way Patch open cluster Messier 26 Messier 27 Messier 28 Messier 29 Messier 30 open cluster Dumbbell Nebula globular cluster open cluster globular cluster Messier 31 Messier 32 Messier 33 Messier 34 Messier 35 Andromeda dwarf Andromeda Galaxy Triangulum Galaxy open cluster open cluster elliptical galaxy Messier 36 Messier 37 Messier 38 Messier 39 Messier 40 open cluster open cluster open cluster open cluster double star Winecke 4 Messier 41 Messier 42/43 Messier 44 Messier 45 Messier 46 open cluster Orion Nebula Praesepe Pleiades open cluster Beehive Cluster Suburu Messier 47 Messier 48 Messier 49 Messier 50 Messier 51 open cluster open cluster elliptical galaxy open cluster Whirlpool Galaxy Messier 52 Messier 53 Messier 54 Messier 55 Messier 56 open cluster globular cluster globular cluster globular cluster globular cluster Messier 57 Messier
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Sp Target Information
    SUMMER SP TARGET INFORMATION ALGIEBA (g LEO) BASIC INFORMATION OBJECT TYPE: Binary Star CONSTELLATION: Leo BEST VIEW: Late April DISCOVERY: Known to Ancients DISTANCE: 131 ly BINARY SEPARATION: 4” (170 AU) ORBITAL PERIOD: ~500 yr. APPARENT MAGNITUDE: 1.98 DISTANCE DETERMINATION After measuring the shift in position of the star relative to background stars as Earth orbits the Sun, simple trigonometry can yield the distance. The Hipparcos satellite was launched in 1989 to create a comprehensive catalog of trigonometric parallax measurements from space. The distance quoted above is from this catalog. NOTABLE FEATURES/FACTS • William Herschel discovered Algieba’s binary nature in 1782. • Both components of Algieba have evolved beyond the main sequence. They began their lives as B-type stars, and they will end their lives as white dwarfs. • In 2010, a team including former UT astronomer Arte Hatzes discovered a planet orbiting Algieba A. The planet is nine times the mass of Jupiter and orbits the star in 1.2 years at an average distance of 1.2 AU. SUMMER SP TARGET INFORMATION MESSIER 97 (THE OWL NEBULA) BASIC INFORMATION OBJECT TYPE: Planetary Nebula CONSTELLATION: Ursa Major BEST VIEW: Early May DISCOVERY: Pierre Mechain, 1781 DISTANCE: ~2000 ly DIAMETER: 1.8 ly APPARENT MAGNITUDE: +9.9 APPARENT DIMENSIONS: 3.3’ DISTANCE DETERMINATION The distances to most planetary nebulae are very poorly known. A variety of methods can be used, providing mixed results. In many cases, astronomers resort to statistical methods to estimate the distances to planetary nebulae. Although we don’t have accurate distances for most of the planetary nebulae in the Milky Way, we do know exactly how far away the Large Magellanic Cloud is.
    [Show full text]
  • What's up This Month – May 2017
    WHAT'S UP THIS MONTH – MAY 2017 THESE PAGES ARE INTENDED TO HELP YOU FIND YOUR WAY AROUND THE SKY The chart on the last page is included for printing off and use outside The chart above shows the whole night sky as it appears on 15th May at 22:00 (10 o’clock) in the evening British Summer Time (BST). As the Earth orbits the Sun and we look out into space each night the stars will appear to have moved across the sky by a small amount. Every month Earth moves one twelfth of its circuit around the Sun, this amounts to 30 degrees each month. There are about 30 days in each month so each night the stars appear to move about 1 degree. The sky will therefore appear the same as shown on the chart above at 11 o’clock BST at the beginning of the month and at 9 o’clock BST at the end of the month. The stars also appear to move 15º (360º divided by 24) each hour from east to west, due to the Earth rotating once every 24 hours. The sky appears to rotate from east to west around the Pole Star (Polaris). The centre of the chart will be the position in the sky directly overhead, called the Zenith. First we need to find some familiar objects so we can get our bearings. The Pole Star Polaris can 1 be easily found by first finding the familiar shape of the Great Bear ‘Ursa Major’ that is also sometimes called the Plough or even the Big Dipper by the Americans.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Nature of Globular and Open Clusters (GOC): a Study of M16, M67, M3 & M71 ?
    NLUAstro 1, 1-20 (2019) Notices of Lancaster University Astrophysics PHYS369: Astrophysics Group project On the nature of Globular and Open Clusters (GOC): a study of M16, M67, M3 & M71 ? Emma Dodd1, Harry Baker1, Hamish Child1, Thomas Harrison1, Matthew Hodge1, Alexander Hackett-Evans1 & David Sobral1y 1 Department of Physics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YB, UK Accepted 29 May 2019. Received 23 May 2019; in original form 25 March 2019 ABSTRACT A new study of two open clusters, M16 and M67, and two globular clusters, M3 and M71 is presented, exploring data taken with the WFC/INT and the Hubble Space Tele- scope (HST) in a variety of broad-band filters. A dedicated, fully functioning reduction pipeline was constructed to reduce the data used in this study. Employing SExtractor, photometry is conducted in both g and i band filters to obtain Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) diagrams which are fitted with isochrones to determine the average age, distance, metallicity and extinction of each cluster. We find that M16 is ≈ 2 kpc away, with a high dust extinction of E(B-V)≈ 0:5. For M67 the distance was found to be ≈ 0:7 kpc and the cluster is less affected by extinction, showing E(B-V)≈ 0:2. M3 is consistent with being 13 kpc away and it shows little to no extinction. For M71 the distance was found to be ∼ 3kpc and we estimate a moderate extinction of E(B-V)≈ 0:25. The re- sults of this study highlight the stark contrast between open and globular clusters. We find that M16 and M67 (open clusters) have average ages of < 10 Myrs and 3:5 Gyrs, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Messier (1730-1817) Was an Observational Astronomer Working
    Charles Messier (1730-1817) was an observational Catalogue (NGC) which was being compiled at the same astronomer working from Paris in the eighteenth century. time as Messier's observations but using much larger tele­ He discovered between 15 and 21 comets and observed scopes, probably explains its modern popularity. It is a many more. During his observations he encountered neb­ challenging but achievable task for most amateur astron­ ulous objects that were not comets. Some of these objects omers to observe all the Messier objects. At «star parties" were his own discoveries, while others had been known and within astronomy clubs, going for the maximum before. In 1774 he published a list of 45 of these nebulous number of Messier objects observed is a popular competi­ objects. His purpose in publishing the list was so that tion. Indeed at some times of the year it is just about poss­ other comet-hunters should not confuse the nebulae with ible to observe most of them in a single night. comets. Over the following decades he published supple­ Messier observed from Paris and therefore the most ments which increased the number of objects in his cata­ southerly object in his list is M7 in Scorpius with a decli­ logue to 103 though objects M101 and M102 were in fact nation of -35°. He also missed several objects from his list the same. Later other astronomers added a replacement such as h and X Per and the Hyades which most observers for M102 and objects 104 to 110. It is now thought proba­ would feel should have been included.
    [Show full text]
  • An Update to the Web Edition of the Catalogue of Variable Stars in Galactic Globular Clusters
    VARIABLE STARS, THE GALACTIC HALO AND GALAXY FORMATION C. Sterken, N. Samus and L. Szabados (Eds.) 2010 An Update to the Web Edition of the Catalogue of Variable Stars in Galactic Globular Clusters Christine M. Clement Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S 3H4 Abstract. This is a report on the history and current status of the catalogue of variable stars in Galactic globular clusters. 1. Introduction In 1939, Helen Sawyer Hogg published a catalogue of variable stars in globular clusters to enable researchers interested in the subject to get a clear picture of what work had been done. She produced subsequent editions in 1955 and 1973 and all three were published as part of the David Dunlap Observatory Publications series (Sawyer 1939, 1955; Sawyer Hogg 1973). They are all available in pdf format at www.astro.utoronto.ca/~cclement/readhistory.html. In 1997, the catalogue was updated, put into electronic form and posted on the web. It was revised further in 2001 and a paper summarizingthedatawas published by Clement et al. (2001). Since that time, the catalogue has not been updated on a regular basis. Thus it is time for a revision. 2. Globular cluster variable stars – then and now According to Smith (1995), the first variable to be discoveredinaglobularcluster was a nova that erupted in M80 in 1860. The next discovery came almost three decades later (Pickering 1889) when a bright variable star, now known to be the type II Cepheid M3-V154 (Wallerstein 1990) was detected nearthecentreof Messier 3. By the end of the 19th century, 508 variables had been discovered by Bailey in a systematic search of 19 globular clusters (Pickles 1998; Bailey 1902).
    [Show full text]
  • Helen B. Sawyer a Catalogue of 1116 Variable Stars in Globular Star
    PUBLICATIONS OF THE DAVID DUNLAP OBSERVATORY UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO Volume I Number 4 A CATALOGUE OF 1116 VARIABLE STARS IN GLOBULAR STAR CLUSTERS BY HELEN B. SAWYER 1939 THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO PRESS rokoN ni, ( .\\.\h\ A CATALOGUE OF 1116 VARIABLE STARS IN GLOBULAR STAR CLUSTERS by Helen B. Sawyer A. Introduction. It is now fifty years since the discovery of the first variable star was announced in a globular cluster. The Nova which appeared in the cluster Messier 80 in 1860 can hardly be said to be the beginning of variable star astronomy in clusters, as it is still in a class by itself. In 1902 Bailey gave a summary of the variables in all the clusters which he himself had investigated, and published co-ordinates for the variables. Except for this compilation however, no catalogue of the variable stars in globular clusters has ever been published. In 1930 Shapley published in Star Clusters a summary of the variables known in globular clusters. This summary was brought up to date in 1933 in the Ilandbuch der Astrophysik. Considerable knowledge has been added in the interim, with many new variables discovered, and periods determined. In June, 1938, the writer sent a paper to the Ottawa meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science summarizing the present state of our knowledge. As a basis for this paper, a catalogue was made giving the magnitudes, positions, and periods of all the individual variables. There was originally no intention of publishing the actual catalogue of variables, but only a summary of the data contained therein.
    [Show full text]
  • Messier 1 Messier 2
    Messier 1 { HYPERLINK "http://www.seds.org/messier/nebula.html" } M1 (NGC 1952) in { HYPERLINK "http://www.seds.org/messier/map/Tau.html" } Crab Nebula { HYPERLINK "http://www.seds.org/messier/Jpg/m1.jpg" } Right Ascension 05 : 34.5 (h:m) Declination +22 : 01 (deg:m) Distance 6.3 (kly) Visual Brightness 8.4 (mag) Apparent Dimension 6x4 (arc min) Messier 2 { HYPERLINK "http://www.seds.org/messier/cluster.html" } M2 (NGC 7089) , class II, in { HYPERLINK "http://www.seds.org/messier/map/Aqr.html" } { HYPERLINK "http://www.seds.org/messier/Jpg/m2.jpg" } Right Ascension 21 : 33.5 (h:m) Declination -00 : 49 (deg:m) Distance 37.5 (kly) Visual Brightness 6.5 (mag) Apparent Dimension 16.0 (arc min) Messier 3 { HYPERLINK "http://www.seds.org/messier/cluster.html" } M3 (NGC 5272) , class VI, in { HYPERLINK "http://www.seds.org/messier/map/CVn.html" } { HYPERLINK "http://www.seds.org/messier/Jpg/m3.jpg" } Right Ascension 13 : 42.2 (h:m) Declination +28 : 23 (deg:m) Distance 33.9 (kly) Visual Brightness 6.2 (mag) Apparent Dimension 18.0 (arc min) Messier 4 { HYPERLINK "http://www.seds.org/messier/cluster.html" } M4 (NGC 6121) , class IX, in { HYPERLINK "http://www.seds.org/messier/map/Sco.html" } { HYPERLINK "http://www.seds.org/messier/Jpg/m4.jpg" } Right Ascension 16 : 23.6 (h:m) Declination -26 : 32 (deg:m) Distance 7.2 (kly) Visual Brightness 5.6 (mag) Apparent Dimension 36.0 (arc min) Messier 5 { HYPERLINK "http://www.seds.org/messier/cluster.html" } M5 (NGC 5904) , class V, in { HYPERLINK "http://www.seds.org/messier/map/SerCap.html" } { HYPERLINK
    [Show full text]
  • Messier Objects: Images on the Web a Catalog by Andrew Fraknoi [Dec
    Messier Objects: Images on the Web A Catalog by Andrew Fraknoi [Dec. 2017] NOTE: The images listed are in the public domain, and can thus be used for educational purposes. Under Type: SNR = Supernova Remnant; GSC = Globular Star Cluster; OSC = Open Star Cluster NEB = Nebula; GAL = Galaxy M# Typ Name Picture Address e 1 SNR Crab https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/messier-1-the-crab-nebula Nebula https://www.eso.org/public/images/potw1523a/ 2 GSC https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/messier-2 https://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/html/im0523.html 3 GSC https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/messier-3 https://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/html/im1273.html 4 GSC https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/messier-4 https://www.eso.org/public/images/eso1235a/ 5 GSC https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/messier-5 https://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/html/im0731.html 6 OSC Butterfly https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:M6a.jpg Cluster https://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/html/im0379.html 7 OSC Ptolemy’s http://www.eso.org/public/images/eso1406a/ Cluster https://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/html/im0584.html 8 NEB Lagoon https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/messier-8-the-lagoon-nebula Nebula https://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/html/im1105.html 9 GSC https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/messier-9 https://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/html/im0573.html 10 GSC https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/messier-10 1 https://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/html/im0648.html 11 OSC Wild Duck https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/messier-11-the-wild-duck-cluster
    [Show full text]
  • Algieba (Γ Leo) Ra(2000)
    ALGIEBA (g LEO) RA(2000) : 10h 19m 58.4s DEC(2000): +19° 50’ 29.3” BASIC INFORMATION OBJECT TYPE: Binary Star CONSTELLATION: Leo BEST VIEW: Late ApriL DISCOVERY: Known to Ancients DISTANCE: 131 Ly BINARY SEPARATION: 4” (170 AU) ORBITAL PERIOD: ~500 yr. APPARENT MAGNITUDE: 1.98 MESSIER 97 (THE OWL NEBULA) RA(2000) : 11h 14m 48s DEC(2000): +55° 01’ 09” BASIC INFORMATION OBJECT TYPE: Planetary NebuLa CONSTELLATION: Ursa Major BEST VIEW: EarLy May DISCOVERY: Pierre Mechain, 1781 DISTANCE: ~2000 ly DIAMETER: 1.8 Ly APPARENT MAGNITUDE: +9.9 APPARENT DIMENSIONS: 3.3’ THE LEO TRIPLET (M65, M66, NGC 3628) M65 RA(2000) : 11h 18m 56s DEC(2000): +13° 05’ 32” M66 RA(2000) : 11h 20m 15s DEC(2000): +12° 59’ 29” NGC 3628 RA(2000) : 11h 20m 17s DEC(2000): +13° 35’ 22” BASIC INFORMATION OBJECT TYPE: GaLaxy Group CONSTELLATION: Leo BEST VIEW: EarLy May DISCOVERY: CharLes Messier, 1780 (M65 & M66) WiLLiam HerscheL, 1784 (NGC 3628) DISTANCE: 41.1 miLLion ly (M65) 33.6 miLLion Ly (M66) 37.8 miLLion Ly (NGC 3628) DIAMETER: ~117,000 Ly (M65), ~89,000 Ly (M66), ~163,000 Ly (NGC 3628) APPARENT MAGNITUDE: 10.3 (M65), 9.7 (M66), 9.5 (NGC 3628) NGC 4565 RA(2000) : 12h 36m 21s DEC(2000): +25° 59’ 15” BASIC INFORMATION OBJECT TYPE: GaLaxy CONSTELLATION: Coma Berenices BEST VIEW: May DISCOVERY: WiLLiam HerscheL, 1785 DISTANCE: 41 miLLion ly DIAMETER: ~190,000 Ly APPARENT MAGNITUDE: +10.4 APPARENT DIMENSIONS: 16’ x 3’ MESSIER 104 (THE SOMBRERO GALAXY) RA(2000) : 12h 39m 59s DEC(2000): -11° 37’ 23” BASIC INFORMATION OBJECT TYPE: GaLaxy CONSTELLATION: Virgo BEST VIEW: Late May DISCOVERY: Pierre Mechain, 1781 DISTANCE: ~31 miLLion ly DIAMETER: ~80,000 Ly (based on 31 MLy distance) APPARENT MAGNITUDE: +8.0 APPARENT DIMENSIONS: 9’ x 4’ MESSIER 64 (THE BLACK EYE GALAXY) RA(2000) : 12h 56m 43.7s DEC(2000): +21° 40’ 57.6” M64 BASIC INFORMATION OBJECT TYPE: GaLaxy CONSTELLATION: Coma Berenices BEST VIEW: Late May DISCOVERY: Edward Pigott, 1779 DISTANCE: ~17 miLLion ly DIAMETER: ~50,000 Ly APPARENT MAGNITUDE: +8.5 APPARENT DIMENSIONS: Approx.
    [Show full text]