DOCSLIB.ORG

Without Thinking 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Without Thinking 3 UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Without Thinking: An Ethnography of the Diagnosis of Dementia in an American Clinic and in a French Clinic Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6974v23h Author Tessier, Laurence Anne Publication Date 2014 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Without Thinking: An Ethnography of the Diagnosis of Dementia in an American Clinic and in a French Clinic. by Laurence Anne Tessier A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Xin Liu, Chair Professor Charles Hirschkind Professor Barry Stroud Fall 2014 Abstract Without Thinking: An Ethnography of the Diagnosis of Dementia in an American Clinic and in a French Clinic by Laurence Anne Tessier Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology University of California, Berkeley Professor Xin Liu, Chair This dissertation describes the building of knowledge about dementia in two renowned clinics in the world of neuroscience: one situated in America, the other in France. How do these teams of neuroscientists distinguish the demented person from the reasonable person? Drawing on 18 months of ethnographic research, I analyze how the understanding of frontotemporal dementia (FTD), a neurodegenerative disease that is defined in opposition to Alzheimer’s disease (AD), allows neuroscience to explore, from the destruction of our brain, our emotional and social being. Well equipped with contemporary and American cerebral theories on “empathy” and “sociality”, I then examine how teams of neuroscientists diagnose the pathology of the social and emotional being in an individual patient. How do they reach a diagnosis in a context at times marked by uncertainty? I lay out these uncertainties that point to the weakness of an exclusive positive definition of knowledge and I study how medical expertise can be conceived as connoisseurship, bringing to light the “feelings” and “tastes” of these doctors for the disease as a decisive tool for the making of a diagnosis. I conclude on the differences I observed in the understanding of FTD in the French clinic versus in the American clinic. 1 A ma grand-mère, Geneviève Bernad (1921-2007) A mon père, Paul Tessier (1917-2008) i Acknowledgements My deepest thanks to the patients and their family for letting me stay with them during the many interviews and tests that they are going through. I am very grateful to the directors of the American and French clinics who, without reserve, opened the doors of their worlds to me. Thank you to all the neurologists, research coordinators, neurospychologists, psychologists, residents and nurses who participated in this research and without whom this work couldn’t have come into being. I am also indebted to Aaron Cicourel for initiating this project as well as to the funding organizations for aiding to its accomplishment: the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological research (#8512), the Graduate division at Berkeley and the Berkeley Anthropology department. Thank you to Liu Xin for supporting my endeavor since the beginning and for his instruction and guidance until the end. Thank you to Barry Stroud for teaching me the philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein, for always raising insightful questions and suggestions; the descriptive form that I claim I gave to this work owes all to our conversations. Thank you to Charles Hirschkind for supporting this project, for the kind words of encouragements, for being there. I am also grateful to my friends for their interest, their criticisms and the discussions we had in San Francisco, Paris and Héric: Anthony Stavrianakis, Bharat Venkat, Lyle Fearnley, Emily Chua, Graham Hill, Ruth Goldstein, Bruno Reinhardt, Leticia Cesarino, Lara Migliaccio, Nicolaï Johnson and Arnold Pasquier, thank you. Finally, I thank my mother, Mireille Tessier and my brother, Jean-Paul Tessier, for their encouragements and I do owe a special thank to Anthony Stavrianakis for his unconditional support, for correcting the English of this dissertation (if mistakes remain they are mine of course), for his generous comments and for his enthusiasm, for his love and for taking care of our son, Marcel, while I was writing. ii Contents Glossary Introduction............................................................................................................. 1 I. The Science of Frontotemporal Dementia................................................... 15 1. A story of Behavioral Neurology’s birth and thrive................................... 17 1.1 Geschwind’s Disconnection theory: homecoming to Localizationism, splitting from Holism .......................................................................................... 19 1.2 The paradigm at work in Geschwind’s disconnectionism ..................... 22 1.3 The cycles of Behavioral Neurology: birth, thrive, and reign?...............24 2. “What if it’s not Alzheimer’s?”: FTD and AD in a paradigmatic relationship .......................29 2.1 “The dark ages of dementia”: aging, memory and Alzheimer’s disease .. .............................29 2.2. Dementia now: the youth, American football and war ........................ 32 2.3 Social norms and values at work in the knowledge about frontotemporal dementia.........34 II. The Social Brain ............................................................................................... 39 1. Knowledge of the frontal lobe from 1848 until 1994 .............................. 41 1. 1 “Gage was no longer Gage.”(1848) ......................................................... 41 1.2 Lobotomy: Are the frontal lobes really necessary? (1871-1953)...........43 1.3 Escourolle, Brion, Delay (1958): the first systematic studies of Pick’s disease..................... 45 1.4 François Lhermitte: the frontal and the constraint of the social (1986).. .............................47 1.5 Antonio Damasio and colleagues: emotion, the frontal and the social... .............................51 1.6 A chart to conclude.........................................................................................57 2. The behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia at the Memory clinic 2.1 Lack of punishment and emotional deficit................................................59 2.2 To care or not? The philosopher at the Memory clinic ...........................63 The Home................................................................................................................76 iii III. Uncertainties................................................................................................... 77 1.Certitudes.................................................................................................. 79 Scene 1.”MMS at three.”....................................................................... 79 Scene 2. “Mortified.”.............................................................................. 83 Scene 3. “Ninety-nine years old. ” ...................................................... 87 2.Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) .................................................... 91 Scene 4. “To be continued...” ............................................................... 91 Scene 5. “MCI-ish” ................................................................................. 93 Scene 6. The struggle.............................................................................. 96 3.The genetics of neurodegenerative diseases..................................... 101 Scene 7. High uncertainty................................................................... 101 4. Certitudes that fails.............................................................................. 110 Scene 8. A somatoform disorder........................................................ 111 Scene 9. “Munchausen”... “Scary.”.................................................... 114 The Test............................................................................................................. 122 IV. The Diagnosis........................................................................................... 128 1. Smell and nostalgia........................................................................ 128 2. Experience and Art ....................................................................... 132 3. Dr. K: “Actually I love tests.”....................................................... 136 4. Cheryl Joe: “I feel strange.”.......................................................... 143 5. Eugène Minkowski: “Feeling is a tool for our knowledge.” . 166 6. The dog sign .................................................................................... 168 7. “Diagnosis by feeling.”.................................................................. 171 8. “I’m dumb, I am a phenomenologist.”...................................... 173 9. “I’ve never been wrong.”.............................................................. 175 Conclusion........................................................................................................ 182 Bibliography...................................................................................................... 191 iv GLOSSARY Alzheimer’s disease or Alzheimer disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia. It was first described in 1906 by the German psychiatrist and neuropathologist Aloïs Alzheimer. The most common early
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mygland, Aali, Matre, Gilhus Spine, and One of Us (Lhermitte) Published
    846 Mygland, Aali, Matre, Gilhus 14 Gautel M, Lakey A, Barlow DP, et al. Titin antibodies in 18 Mantegazza R, Beghi E, Pareyson D, et al. A multicentre myasthenia gravis: Identification of a major autogenic follow up study of 1152 patients with myasthenia gravis J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.57.7.846 on 1 July 1994. Downloaded from region of titin. Neurology 1994 (in press). in Italy. J Neurol 1990;237:339-44. 15 Grob D, Arsura EL, Brunner NG, Namba T. The course 19 Pagala MKD, Nandakumar NV, Venkatachari SAT, of myasthenia gravis and therapies affecting outcome. Ravindran K, Namba T, Grob D. Responses of inter- Ann NYAcad Sci 1987;505:472-99. costal muscle biopsies from normal subjects and 16 Oosterhuis HJGH. The natural course of mysthenia patients with myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve 1990;13: gravis: a long term follow up study. .J Neurol Neurosurg 1012-22. Psychiariy 1989;52:1 121-7. 20 Nielson VK, Paulson OB, Rosenkvist J, Holsoe E, Lefvert 17 Durelli L, Maggi G, Casadio C, Ferri R, Rendine S, AK. Rapid improvement of myasthenia gravis after Bergamini L. Actuarial analysis of the occurrence of plasma exchange. Ann Neurol 1982;11: 160-9. remissions following thymectomy for myasthenia gravis 21 Namba T, Brunner NG, Grob D. Idiopathic giant cell in 400 patients. Jf Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;54: polymyositis: report of a case and review of the syn- 406-11. drome. Arch Neurol 1974;31:27-30. Jean Lhermitte 1877-1959 He showed the importance of the inferior olivary nucleus in myoclonus.
    [Show full text]
  • Demonic Possession by Jean Lhermitte
    G Model ENCEP-991; No. of Pages 5 ARTICLE IN PRESS L’Encéphale xxx (2017) xxx–xxx Disponible en ligne sur ScienceDirect www.sciencedirect.com Commentary Demonic possession by Jean Lhermitte Possession diabolique par Jean Lhermitte a b c,∗ E. Drouin , T. Péréon , Y. Péréon a Centre des hautes études de la Renaissance, université de Tours, 37000 Tours, France b Pôle hospitalo-universitaire de psychiatrie adulte, centre hospitalier Guillaume-Régnier, 35703 Rennes, France c Centre de référence maladies neuromusculaires Nantes–Angers, laboratoire d’explorations fonctionnelles, Hôtel-Dieu, CHU de Nantes, 44093 Nantes cedex, France a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: The name of the French neurologist and psychiatrist Jean Lhermitte (1877–1959) is most often associ- Received 13 September 2016 ated with the sign he described back in 1927 in three patients with multiple sclerosis. We are reporting Accepted 13 March 2017 unpublished handwritten notes by Jean Lhermitte about ‘demonic possession’, which date from the 1950s. Available online xxx Drawing from his experiences in neuropsychiatry, Lhermitte gathered notable case reviews as well as individual case histories. For him, cases of demonic possession are of a psychiatric nature with social back- Keywords: ground exerting a strong influence. Like Freud did earlier, Lhermitte believes that the majority of those Demonopathy possessed people have been subjected to sexual trauma with scruples, often linked to religion. Demonic Handwritten notes possession cases were not so rare in the 1950s but their number has nowadays declined substantially with the development of modern psychiatry.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Jumentié 1879-1928
    Joseph Jumentié 1879-1928 Olivier Walusinski Médecin de famille 28160 Brou [email protected] Fig. 1. Joseph Jumentié à La Salpêtrière en 1910 (BIUsanté Paris, domaine public). Résumé Joseph Jumentié (1879-1928), par ses qualités de clinicien et sa sagacité d’anatomo- pathologiste, sut faire honneur à ses maîtres en neurologie, Jules Dejerine, Augusta Dejerine- Klumpke et Joseph Babiński. Leur notoriété a laissé dans l’ombre la collaboration précieuse que Jumentié leur a assurée. A côté d’une remarquable thèse de doctorat fixant la sémiologie des tumeurs de l’angle ponto-cérébelleux en 1911, ses nombreuses publications ont abordé tous les domaines de la neurologie. Nous présentons, à titre d’exemple, ses recherches concernant le cervelet, les tumeurs cérébrales et mettons en valeur l’aide fournie à Mme Dejerine dans l’identification des « faisceaux » des grandes voies cortico-spinales au niveau bulbo- protubérantiel par la technique des coupes sériées multiples. Cette évocation est précédée d’une brève biographie illustrée de photos, pour la plupart, inédites. 1 Jules Dejerine (1849-1917) et Joseph Babiński (1857-1932) sont des neurologues célèbres et reconnus mondialement. Leurs travaux n’auraient sans doute pas toute la valeur que nous leur accordons, s’ils n’avaient pas eu l’aide déterminante de collaborateurs compétents et zélés. Joseph Jumentié est l’un de ceux-ci, formé par ces deux maîtres de la neurologie auxquels il resta fidèlement très attaché. Leur célébrité, comme une ombre portée, a plongé dans l’oubli l’œuvre de Jumentié. C’est celle-ci que nous souhaitons remettre en lumière. Joseph Julien Jumentié est né le 28 octobre 1879 à Clermont-Ferrand d’un père Alfred Jumentié (1848-1909) professeur au lycée et d’une mère au foyer Mathilde Poisson (1852-1902).
    [Show full text]
  • 111 Luria Layout 1
    111 Luria:Layout 1 2012-12-12 09:54 Strona 1 HISTORICAL PAPER ACTAVol. 10, No. 3, 2012, 341-369 NEUROPSYCHOLOGICA Received: 28.09.2012 Accepted: 20.10.2012 ALEXANDER ROMANOVICH LURIA A – Study Design (1902-1977) AND THE MICROGENETIC B – Data Collection C – Statistical Analysis APPROACH TO THE DIAGNOSIS AND D – Data Interpretation E – Manuscript Preparation F – Literature Search REHABILITATION OF TBI PATIENTS G – Funds Collection Maria Pąchalska1,2(A,B,D,E,F,G) Bożydar L. J. Kaczmarek3(A,B,D,E) 1 Andrzej Frycz-Modrzewski Cracow University, Cracow, Poland 2 Center for Cognition and Communication, New York, N.Y., USA 3 University of Economics and Innovation, Lublin, Poland SUMMARY Alexander Romanovich Luria (1902-1977), Russian psycho - logist and neuropsychologist, is recognized throughout the world as one of the most eminent and influential psycholo- gists of the 20th century, who made advances in many areas, including cognitive psychology, the processes of learning and forgetting, mental retarda tion and neuropsychology. Luria’s scientific career was build in “the stages of a journey under- taken” (as the Russian title of Luria’s autobiography says): co-working with Lev S. Vygotsky (1896-1934) and the foun- dation of the cultural-historical school (the 1920s), cross-cul- tural research, an expedition to Central Asia, and studies on twins (the 1930s), the war and the first works on brain injured patients (the 1940s), research into mentally retarded children, brain injuries and rehabilitation (1950s), the systematic devel- opment of neuropsychological research (the 1960s and 70s). The research on the functioning of the brain, touching on learn- ing and forgetting, attention and perception as psychological con- structs, was to engage Luria for forty years.
    [Show full text]
  • Overcoming Learning Disabilities: a Vygotskian-Lurian
    overcoming learning disabilities Based on the ideas of Russian psychologists Lev Vygotsky and Alexander Luria, this book explores methods of preventing or overcoming learning disabili- ties. Tatiana V. Akhutina and Natalia M. Pylaeva follow Vygotsky and Luria’s sociocultural theory and their principles of a systemic structure and dynamic organization of higher mental functions, building on their theoretical founda- tion by focusing on the interactive scaffolding of the weak components of the child’s functional systems, the transition from joint child–adult co-actions, and the emotional involvement of the child. The authors discuss effective methods of remediation of attention, executive functions (working memory and cognitive control), and spatial and visual- verbal functions. Overcoming Learning Disabilities translates complex problems into easily understandable concepts that will be appreciated by school psychol- ogists, special and general education teachers, and parents of children with learning disabilities. Tatiana V. Akhutina is the head of the Laboratory of Neuropsychology at Lomonosov Moscow State University and of the Laboratory of Learning Dis- abilities at Moscow State University of Psychology and Education. She has published in Russian, English, Spanish, Finnish, and German. In 2003 the Jour- nal of Russian and East European Psychology dedicated a special issue to her research on psychology of language and neuropsychology. Natalia M. Pylaeva is a neuropsychologist at Lomonosov Moscow State Univer- sity. She is a coauthor with Tatiana V. Akhutina of five books on methods of remediation of learning disabilities. Her articles and books have been translated into English, Finnish, Slovak, and Spanish. Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 14.139.43.12 on Tue Oct 09 10:26:09 BST 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • A. R. LURIA and the CULTURAL- HISTORICAL Approach INPSYCHOLOGY!
    In: A.R. Luria and Contemporary Psychology ISBN 1-59454-102-7 Editors: T. Akhutina et aI., pp. 35-41 © 2005 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Chapter 5 A. R. LURIA AND THE CULTURAL- HISTORICAL ApPROACH IN PSYCHOLOGY! Michael Cole THE ESSENTIAL IDEAS: LURIA AS CULTURAL- HISTORICAL PSYCHOLOGIST If one were to approach a professional rsychologist at an international conference and ask, "Who was Alexander Luria and what was his contribution to psychology," it is overwhelmingly probable that you would be told that Alexander Luria was the "father of neuropsychology," who lived and worked in the Soviet Union in the middle of the twentieth century. There is no doubt that within the sub-discipline of neuropsychology, his methods and sometimes his theories have been widely cited. Even within neuropsychology, he remains a recognizably distinctive figure, as David Tupper has noted (Tupper, 1999). When his methods are actively used, they are also widely modified in ways which would be likely to evoke his disapproval. David Tupper (1999) characterizes Luria's'distinctiveness as follows: Theoretically, Luria attempts to test an overriding metatheory; his approach is synthetic and his data are derived from clinical neurology whereas, North American Neuropsychologists have no overall theory, preferring instead to test specific hypotheses; their approach is analytic and their data are derived from psychometric tests. In terms of assessment techniques, Luria's methods are qualitative and flexible; he seeks links in functional systems, his methods are clinical-theoretical and case oriented. By contrast, North American Neuropsychologists rely on psychometric, actuarial, quantitative, group studies. 1 This article was published in Russian in 2002, titled: A.
    [Show full text]
  • Rossouw, Kosyanaya - Alexander Luria
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265346426 Rossouw, Kosyanaya - Alexander Luria Dataset · September 2014 CITATIONS READS 0 23 2 authors: Maria Kostyanaya Pieter Rossouw Queensland Government Central Queensland University; The Neurop… 8 PUBLICATIONS 4 CITATIONS 83 PUBLICATIONS 133 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Developing capacity in a compromised environment. A forensic study from a neurobiological perspective. View project Developing capacity in a compromised environment. A forensic study from a neurobiological perspective. View project All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, Available from: Pieter Rossouw letting you access and read them immediately. Retrieved on: 07 October 2016 perspectives alexander luria: life, research & contribution to neuroscience. Maria Ilmarovna Kostyanaya The University of Queensland Pieter Rossouw School of Psychology, School of Social Work and Human Services The University of Queensland Abstract This article focuses on the Soviet psychologist and founder of Russian neuropsychology, Alexander Romanovich Luria, and his contribution to the development of neuroscience globally. The article be- gins with a short biography, with particular focus on the formation of Luria’s theoretical views. Key as- pects of theory concerning the structural and functional organization of the brain are then discussed, including Luria’s ideas on the three principal functional units and the interaction between them. In conclusion, Luria’s scientific ideas are compared to developments in contemporary research. Key words: Luria, neuropsychology, Russian neuropsychology, principal functional units, neuroscience, neuropsychotherapy. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to : Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals of Computational Neuroscience
    0 Computational Neuroscience • Introduction • About me : Olivier Manette 1 Dreamspeed Project www.flod.aero 2 Some recent bibliography 30 Janvier 2014 Livre, Presse Académique Francophone Codage spatio-temporel des neurones cortico-motoneuronaux: ou comment le cerveau parle à nos muscles? •ISBN-13: 978-3841622709 Février 2009 Chapitre dans Livre, Theory and Novel Applications of Machine Learning, I-Tech, Vienna TempUnit: A bio-inspired spiking Neural Network? •ISBN-13: 978-3-902613-55-4, pp. 376 Aout 2013 Proceeding of: Neuroinformatics 2013, At Stockholm, Sweden HELMHOLTZ: A CUSTOMIZABLE FRAMEWORK FOR NEUROPHYSIOLOGY DATA MANAGEMENT •Andrew P. Davison, Thierry Brizzi, Domenico Guarino, Olivier F. Manette, Cyril Monier, Gerard Sadoc, Yves Fregnac Juillet 2011 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, San Jose 2011 TEMPORAL AND RATE DECODING IN SPIKING NEURONS WITH DENDRITES •Olivier F. Manette Juillet 2011 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, San Jose 2011 LOCAL LEARNING RULES FOR SPIKING NEURONS WITH DENDRITE •Olivier F. Manette Juin 2011 International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility, Stockholm, 2011 SPEEDING 100 FOLD NEURAL NETWORK SIMULATIONS WITH GPU PROCESSING •Olivier F. Manette, German Hernandez 3 What is Computational Neuroscience? Computational Neuroscience is the theoretical study of the brain to uncover the principles and mechanisms that guide the development, organization, information processing and mental abilities of the nervous system. 4 Computational/theoretical tools in context 5 EEG and fMRI
    [Show full text]
  • Internationalism in Psychology: We Need It Cole, M., Gay, J., Glick, J
    psychology as a profession and set out for graduate Gay, J., & Cole, M. (1967). The new mathematics and an school—both for him and for the world. old culture. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Selected Bibliography Luria, A. R. (1971). Towards the problem of the historical nature of psychological processes (M. Cole, Trans.). Inter- Cole, M. (Ed.). (1976). Forward. In A. R. Luria, Cognitive national Journal of Psychology, 6(4), 259–272. development: Its cultural and social foundations (pp. xi– xvi). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construc- tion zone: Working for cognitive change in school. New Cole, M. (1988). Cross-cultural research in the socio-his- York: Cambridge University Press. torical tradition. Human Development, 31, 147–157. Nissim-Sabat, D., Cole, M., & Belyaeva, A. V. (1997). Telecommunications in the former Soviet Union: Activities Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future in psychology. European Psychologist, 2(1), 52–58. discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of liter- Cole, M. (1998). Can cultural psychology help us think acy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. about diversity? Mind, Culture and Activity, 5, 291–304. Sharp, D., Cole, M., & Lave, J. (1979). Education and cog- Cole, M., & Cole, S. (1989). The development of children. nitive development: The evidence from experimental re- New York: Scientific American Press. search. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 44(1–2, Serial No. 178). Cole, M., Dore, J., Hall, W. S., & Dowley, G. (1978). Sit- uational variability in the speech of preschool children.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociocultural Factors in Brazilian Neuropsycholinguistic Studies
    Psychology & Neuroscience, 2012, 5, 2, 125 - 133 DOI: 10.3922/j.psns.2012.2.02 Sociocultural factors in Brazilian neuropsycholinguistic studies Maria Alice de Mattos Pimenta Parente,1 Maria Teresa Carthery-Goulart,1 Nicolle Zimmermann,2 Rochele Paz Fonseca2 1 – Universidade Federal do ABC, Santo André, SP, Brazil 2 – Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil Abstract The history of Brazilian neuropsychology is traced at different neuropsycholinguistic stages with a focus on the importance of sociocultural factors. We first focus on language disorders, the sequelae of injuries in the left hemisphere, and neuropsychology restricted to the medical field in Europe, the United States, and Brazil. In the middle of the last century, attention to the interdisciplinary importance of studies on the right hemisphere began. Studies consequently emerged on the individual variability of brain function with both biological and cultural origins. Based on this approach, Brazilian studies on aphasic children and illiterate aphasic persons were disseminated internationally. In the 1970s, cognitive neuropsychology began in England, highlighting dysfunctions in reading and writing processes. The characteristics of writing systems within each language became relevant for the manifestations of acquired dyslexia. Brazilian studies showed deficits in Portuguese and Japanese writing caused by brain lesions. During this scientific journey, scientific societies and postgraduate programs in Brazil were created to facilitate exchanges and communication among young researchers. By the end of the last century and in the early 2000s, the growth of the neuropsychology of aging raised awareness of the complexity of sociocultural factors, not only on language research but also according to the level of education, frequency of reading and writing habits, school type, and interactions among these factors and biological factors, especially between the level of education and age.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neuropsychology of Attention
    The Neuropsychology of Attention Ronald A. Cohen The Neuropsychology of Attention Second Edition Ronald A. Cohen, PhD, ABPP, ABCN Professor Departments of Neurology, Psychiatry and Aging Director, Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory University of Florida College of Medicine Gainesville , FL , USA Adjunct Professor Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior Warren Alpert School of Medicine Brown University Providence , RI , USA ISBN 978-0-387-72638-0 ISBN 978-0-387-72639-7 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-72639-7 Springer New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2013941376 © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, speci fi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on micro fi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied speci fi cally for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early Theoretical Development of Alexander Romanovich Luria. An
    THE EARLY THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENT OF ALEXANDER ROMANOVICH LURIA An Exploration of His Work 1921-1936 MICHAEL PAUL GEORGE HAMES THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF LONDON FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY 2002 ProQuest Number: U643248 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest U643248 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 THE EARLY THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENT OF ALEXANDER ROMANOVICH LURIA MICHAEL PAUL GEORGE HAMES ABSTRACT: Alexander Luria (1902-1977) is famous as a founder of neuropsychology, but his early theoretical development has never been seriously investigated at any length. Part I, The Early Years, deals chronologically with Luria's development from 1921-6. It looks at his intellectual background, his early experiments using his combined verbal and motor response method of investigating the structural dynamics of stress. It examines his use of objective approaches to reflexes in Pavlov, and his attempt to combine it with Freud’s psychodynamic approach. Luria’s early collaboration with Lev Vygotsky is explored, together with their joint and individual attempts to resolve the apparent methodological impasse this combination presented to explaining the nature of higher psychological processes.
    [Show full text]