DOCSLIB.ORG

Using the Whole Brain to Improve Strategic Reasoning

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Legal Studies and Business Ethics Papers Wharton Faculty Research 12-2015 Using the Whole Brain to Improve Strategic Reasoning Roderick Gilkey Ricardo Caceda Andrew Bate Diana C. Robertson University of Pennsylvania Clint Kilts Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/lgst_papers Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, Business Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Gilkey, R., Caceda, R., Bate, A., Robertson, D. C., & Kilts, C. (2015). Using the Whole Brain to Improve Strategic Reasoning. Neuro Leadership Journal, 1-9. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/ lgst_papers/16 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/lgst_papers/16 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Using the Whole Brain to Improve Strategic Reasoning Abstract Traditional views of strategic reasoning have emphasized the role of cognitive analytic processes, often to the neglect of affective and social behavioral functions. This bias has influenced both the theory and the practice of strategic planning. Neuroscientific esearr ch holds the promise of identifying a much broader range of human capacities that contribute to the ability to engage and excel in strategic reasoning. Our study of the strategic reasoning performance of a group of mid-career business leaders identified the engagement of social and emotional brain processes that play an important role in strategic thinking ability. In identifying the neural processing correlates of strategic and tactical thinking, we hope to expand and revise the theories of strategic thinking and help develop models for more effective application. We suggest that understanding and engaging the brain’s fuller range of information- processing capacity in accomplishing strategic expertise is itself an important strategy for enhancing the performance of individuals and organizations. We also explore the need to create brain-friendly organizational environments to enhance human performance. Disciplines Arts and Humanities | Business | Social and Behavioral Sciences This working paper is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/lgst_papers/16 Using the whole brain to improve strategic reasoning Roderick Gilkey, Ph.D.,1 Ricardo Cáceda, MD, Ph.D.,2 Andrew Bate, M.B.A.,1 Diana Robertson, Ph.D.3 and Clint Kilts, Ph.D.4 This article was published in the NeuroLeadershipjouRnAl issUe FOUR The attached copy is furnished to the author for non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the author’s institution, sharing with colleagues and providing to institutional administration. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third- party websites are prohibited. in most cases authors are permitted to post a version of the article to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding the NeuroLeadership Journal’s archiving and management policies are encouraged to send inquiries to: [email protected] www.NeuroLeadership.org RESEARCH The NeuroLeadership Journal is for non-commercial research and education use only. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third-party websites are prohibited. in most cases authors are permitted to post a version of the article to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding the NeuroLeadership Journal’s archiving and management policies are encouraged to send inquiries to: [email protected] The views, opinions, conjectures, and conclusions provided by the authors of the articles in the NeuroLeadership Journal may not express the positions taken by the NeuroLeadership Journal, the NeuroLeadership institute, the institute’s Board of Advisors, or the various constituencies with which the institute works or otherwise affiliates or cooperates.i t is a basic tenant of both the NeuroLeadership institute and the NeuroLeadership Journal to encourage and stimulate creative thought and discourse in the emerging field of NeuroLeadership. NeuroLeadership Journal (ISSN 2200-8535) issue Four published in October 2012. We encourage readers to propose a paper for the next edition of this Journal. We recommend sending in a two-page proposal before submitting a finished paper and welcome pure science, as well as case studies and discussion pieces. For further information as to how to submit a paper for © NeuroLeadership Institute 2012 For Permissions, email [email protected] Permissions, 2012 For Institute © NeuroLeadership the next Journal go to www.NeuroLeadership.org RESEARCH Using the whole brain to improve strategic reasoning Roderick Gilkey, Ph.D.,1 Ricardo Cáceda, MD, Ph.D.,2 Andrew Bate, M.B.A.,1 Diana Robertson, Ph.D.3 and Clint Kilts, Ph.D.4 1 Goizueta Business school, emory University 2 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral sciences, University of Miami Miller school of Medicine 3 Wharton school, University of Pennsylvania 4 Psychiatric Research institute, University of Arkansas for Medical sciences ABSTRACT hefty price tag. The annual expenditure for consulting services in the U.s. was approximately $170 billion dollars in 2011, Traditional views of strategic reasoning have with strategic consulting accounting for approximately 12% emphasized the role of cognitive analytic processes, (or about $20 billion) of the total (First Research, 2012). The often to the neglect of affective and social behavioral expenditures associated with strategic consulting represent functions. This bias has influenced both the theory conservative estimates, because the bulk of these expenses and the practice of strategic planning. neuroscientific are incurred by high-end private firms that do not make research holds the promise of identifying a much their revenues public. Despite these investments, strategic broader range of human capacities that contribute to planning efforts produce what appear to be disappointing the ability to engage and excel in strategic reasoning. or uncertain results. While there are many explanations for our study of the strategic reasoning performance of this suboptimal performance, including poor downstream a group of mid-career business leaders identified the implementation processes, the prime cause may lie engagement of social and emotional brain processes upstream, the result of a flawed or limited understanding of that play an important role in strategic thinking the very nature of strategic thinking and planning itself. We ability. In identifying the neural processing correlates would be well advised to ask if our emphasis on cognitive, of strategic and tactical thinking, we hope to expand linear, and analytic approaches to strategic thinking is and revise the theories of strategic thinking and help misplaced and contributes to underperformance. develop models for more effective application. We suggest that understanding and engaging the brain’s Could our failure to appreciate the emotional/affective, fuller range of information-processing capacity in social, or deliberative (versus automated) elements of accomplishing strategic expertise is itself an important strategy explain why so many strategic initiatives fail strategy for enhancing the performance of individuals because of lack of engagement and execution? From a and organizations. We also explore the need to create neuroscience perspective, we might ask if the current model brain-friendly organizational environments to enhance of strategic thinking – involving a selective and limited use human performance. of some brain capacities (reflective or analytically focused) without drawing upon other perspectives and brain Introduction capabilities – affective, social, and reflexive – could be the Despite the heavy and costly emphasis on cognitive source of failed strategies. Can it be that the first challenge approaches to enhancing strategic planning ability, outcomes in strategic planning is to re-conceptualize and expand remain disappointingly mixed. For example, a recent report our definition and understanding of strategic thinking? in The economist (2011) examined 197 companies and found eisenhardt and Zbaracki, in their seminal paper “strategic only 63% of them reporting positive anticipated results from Decision-Making” (1992), advocate for such a reformulation their strategic planning initiatives. This disconnect carries a of our view of strategy: “we … propose a broader agenda. 1 email [email protected] Permissions, 2012 For Institute © NeuroLeadership NeuroLeadershipJOURNAL Issue FOuR RESEARCH Part of that agenda involves creating a more realistic view we developed to assess the relative performance of each of strategic decision-making by opening up our conceptions subject on a series of strategic thinking questions in order of cognition … to include insight, intuition, (and) emotion” to identify the most and least proficient strategic thinkers (p. 35). The authors are responding to what has become on a continuum. the gold standard for defining and creating strategy first The study was organized in the following sequence: espoused by Michael Porter (1996). Porter describes 1. Identifying subjects from an executive MBA leadership strategic thinking as a rational decision-making process course and conducting a brief interview
Recommended publications
  • Redalyc.EPISTEMOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES in THE

    Redalyc.EPISTEMOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES in THE

    Acta Colombiana de Psicología ISSN: 0123-9155 [email protected] Universidad Católica de Colombia Colombia Armengol de la Miyar, Carmen G.; Moes, Elisabeth J. EPISTEMOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES IN THE SCIENTIFIC STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EXECUTIVE FUNCTION Acta Colombiana de Psicología, vol. 17, núm. 2, 2014, pp. 69-79 Universidad Católica de Colombia Bogotá, Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=79832492008 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Acta.colomb.psicol. 17 (2): 69-79, 2014 http://www.dx.doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2014.17.2.8 EPISTEMOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES IN THE SCIENTIFIC STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EXECUTIVE FUNCTION Dr. Carmen G. Armengol de la Miyar1*, Dr. Elisabeth J. Moes2** 1Counseling and Applied Psychology Department, Bouve College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A. 2Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, Suffolk University, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A. Recibido, abril 25/2014 Referencia: Armengol de la Miyar, C.G. & Moes, E.J. Concepto de evaluación, mayo 12/2014 (2014). Epistemological perspectives in the scientific Aceptado, mayo 28/2014 study and clinical evaluation of executive function. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 17 (2), pp. 69-79. DOI:10.14718/ ACP.2014.17.2.8 Abstract In this article, epistemological perspectives that have shaped and affected the scientific quest for understanding what neuropsychologists term “executive functions” are reviewed. Executive functions refer to the control functions of cognition and behavior.
  • 111 Luria Layout 1

    111 Luria Layout 1

    111 Luria:Layout 1 2012-12-12 09:54 Strona 1 HISTORICAL PAPER ACTAVol. 10, No. 3, 2012, 341-369 NEUROPSYCHOLOGICA Received: 28.09.2012 Accepted: 20.10.2012 ALEXANDER ROMANOVICH LURIA A – Study Design (1902-1977) AND THE MICROGENETIC B – Data Collection C – Statistical Analysis APPROACH TO THE DIAGNOSIS AND D – Data Interpretation E – Manuscript Preparation F – Literature Search REHABILITATION OF TBI PATIENTS G – Funds Collection Maria Pąchalska1,2(A,B,D,E,F,G) Bożydar L. J. Kaczmarek3(A,B,D,E) 1 Andrzej Frycz-Modrzewski Cracow University, Cracow, Poland 2 Center for Cognition and Communication, New York, N.Y., USA 3 University of Economics and Innovation, Lublin, Poland SUMMARY Alexander Romanovich Luria (1902-1977), Russian psycho - logist and neuropsychologist, is recognized throughout the world as one of the most eminent and influential psycholo- gists of the 20th century, who made advances in many areas, including cognitive psychology, the processes of learning and forgetting, mental retarda tion and neuropsychology. Luria’s scientific career was build in “the stages of a journey under- taken” (as the Russian title of Luria’s autobiography says): co-working with Lev S. Vygotsky (1896-1934) and the foun- dation of the cultural-historical school (the 1920s), cross-cul- tural research, an expedition to Central Asia, and studies on twins (the 1930s), the war and the first works on brain injured patients (the 1940s), research into mentally retarded children, brain injuries and rehabilitation (1950s), the systematic devel- opment of neuropsychological research (the 1960s and 70s). The research on the functioning of the brain, touching on learn- ing and forgetting, attention and perception as psychological con- structs, was to engage Luria for forty years.
  • Overcoming Learning Disabilities: a Vygotskian-Lurian

    Overcoming Learning Disabilities: a Vygotskian-Lurian

    overcoming learning disabilities Based on the ideas of Russian psychologists Lev Vygotsky and Alexander Luria, this book explores methods of preventing or overcoming learning disabili- ties. Tatiana V. Akhutina and Natalia M. Pylaeva follow Vygotsky and Luria’s sociocultural theory and their principles of a systemic structure and dynamic organization of higher mental functions, building on their theoretical founda- tion by focusing on the interactive scaffolding of the weak components of the child’s functional systems, the transition from joint child–adult co-actions, and the emotional involvement of the child. The authors discuss effective methods of remediation of attention, executive functions (working memory and cognitive control), and spatial and visual- verbal functions. Overcoming Learning Disabilities translates complex problems into easily understandable concepts that will be appreciated by school psychol- ogists, special and general education teachers, and parents of children with learning disabilities. Tatiana V. Akhutina is the head of the Laboratory of Neuropsychology at Lomonosov Moscow State University and of the Laboratory of Learning Dis- abilities at Moscow State University of Psychology and Education. She has published in Russian, English, Spanish, Finnish, and German. In 2003 the Jour- nal of Russian and East European Psychology dedicated a special issue to her research on psychology of language and neuropsychology. Natalia M. Pylaeva is a neuropsychologist at Lomonosov Moscow State Univer- sity. She is a coauthor with Tatiana V. Akhutina of five books on methods of remediation of learning disabilities. Her articles and books have been translated into English, Finnish, Slovak, and Spanish. Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 14.139.43.12 on Tue Oct 09 10:26:09 BST 2012.
  • Resultado Final - Ordenado Por Departamento Item Autor Titulo Editora Q Preco Ptotal Depart

    Resultado Final - Ordenado Por Departamento Item Autor Titulo Editora Q Preco Ptotal Depart

    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SÃO JOÃO DEL-REI EDITAL 001/2009 - RESULTADO FINAL - ORDENADO POR DEPARTAMENTO ITEM AUTOR TITULO EDITORA Q PRECO PTOTAL DEPART. PROFESSOR 1 DUNSTER, David 100 casas unifamiliares de la arquitectura del siglo XX Gustavo Gilli 2 100,97 201,94 Arquitetura Ana Cristina Reis Faria 2 CHOAY, Françoise A alegoria do patrimônio Estação Liberdade 5 48,00 240,00 Arquitetura Ana Cristina Reis Faria 3 ROMERO, Marta Adriana BuA arquitetura bioclimática do espaço público. UnB 5 32,00 160,00 Arquitetura Ana Cristina Reis Faria 4 WOLFFLIN, Heinrich A arte clássica Martins Fontes 5 56,00 280,00 Arquitetura Ana Cristina Reis Faria 5 WORRINGER, Wi A arte gótica. Edições 70 5 41,00 205,00 Arquitetura Ana Cristina Reis Faria 6 ABALOS, Iñaki. A boa-vida: visita guiada às casas da modernidade G. Gili, 5 84,00 420,00 Arquitetura Ana Cristina Reis Faria 7 RYKWERT, Joseph A casa de Adão no paraíso Perspectiva 5 47,00 235,00 Arquitetura Ana Cristina Reis Faria 8 BRANDÃO, Ludmila de LimA casa subjetiva. Matérias, afectos e espaços domésticos Perspectiva 5 40,00 200,00 Arquitetura Ana Cristina Reis Faria 9 CARLOS, Ana Fani A. A cidade Contexto 5 32,89 164,45 Arquitetura Ana Cristina Reis Faria 10 ARANTES, Otília Beatriz FioA cidade do pensamento único: desmanchando consensos Vozes 5 37,60 188,00 Arquitetura Ana Cristina Reis Faria 11 ROLNIK, Raquel. A cidade e a lei: legislação, política urbana e territórios na Studio Nobel 5 53,00 265,00 Arquitetura Ana Cristina Reis Faria 12 BENEVOLO, Leonardo A cidade e o arquiteto: método e historia na arquitetura.
  • Webinar by Elkhonon Goldberg, Phd

    Webinar by Elkhonon Goldberg, Phd

    Webinar by Elkhonon Goldberg, PhD WEBINAR “COVID-19 AND BRAIN DYSFUNCTION: EVOLVING UNDERSTANDING” COVID-19 is a viral illness caused by the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), which has become a global pandemic affecting all of us. While it has been originally characterized as respiratory illness, a growing body of evidence suggests that the brain may also be affected. In this webinar we will discuss the concept of “neuro-COVID” and examine the emerging evidence of COVID-19 impact on the human brain and the multiple clinical neurological and neuropsychological manifestations of this impact. In particular, we will discuss the potential for long-term neurocognitive sequelae of neuro-COVID and the role of neuropsychology in addressing them. In addition, we will briefly review the impact of diseases caused by other coronaviruses (SARS, MERS) on the brain. Date and time: December 10, 2020 (Thursday) from 2pm to 5:15pm Eastern Time (1pm – 4:15pm Central Time, 11am – 2:15pm Pacific Time) December 12, 2020 (Saturday) from 12pm to 3:15pm Eastern Time (11am – 2:15pm Central Time, 9am – 12:15pm Pacific Time) Topics to be covered: COVID-19 pandemic and the brain. Brain as the target of COVID-19. Direct vs indirect mechanisms of brain damage in COVID-19. Primary mechanisms of brain infection: transsynaptic vs hematogenous. Mechanisms of infection: the role of ACE2 receptor. COVID-19 and immune response. Clinical neurological and neuropsychiatric manifestations of COVID-19. Introducing “Neuro-COVID”. Long-term sequelae of Neuro-COVID. Other coronaviruses and the brain: SARS, MERS. Other viruses and the brain: HIV, and HSV.
  • A. R. LURIA and the CULTURAL- HISTORICAL Approach INPSYCHOLOGY!

    A. R. LURIA and the CULTURAL- HISTORICAL Approach INPSYCHOLOGY!

    In: A.R. Luria and Contemporary Psychology ISBN 1-59454-102-7 Editors: T. Akhutina et aI., pp. 35-41 © 2005 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Chapter 5 A. R. LURIA AND THE CULTURAL- HISTORICAL ApPROACH IN PSYCHOLOGY! Michael Cole THE ESSENTIAL IDEAS: LURIA AS CULTURAL- HISTORICAL PSYCHOLOGIST If one were to approach a professional rsychologist at an international conference and ask, "Who was Alexander Luria and what was his contribution to psychology," it is overwhelmingly probable that you would be told that Alexander Luria was the "father of neuropsychology," who lived and worked in the Soviet Union in the middle of the twentieth century. There is no doubt that within the sub-discipline of neuropsychology, his methods and sometimes his theories have been widely cited. Even within neuropsychology, he remains a recognizably distinctive figure, as David Tupper has noted (Tupper, 1999). When his methods are actively used, they are also widely modified in ways which would be likely to evoke his disapproval. David Tupper (1999) characterizes Luria's'distinctiveness as follows: Theoretically, Luria attempts to test an overriding metatheory; his approach is synthetic and his data are derived from clinical neurology whereas, North American Neuropsychologists have no overall theory, preferring instead to test specific hypotheses; their approach is analytic and their data are derived from psychometric tests. In terms of assessment techniques, Luria's methods are qualitative and flexible; he seeks links in functional systems, his methods are clinical-theoretical and case oriented. By contrast, North American Neuropsychologists rely on psychometric, actuarial, quantitative, group studies. 1 This article was published in Russian in 2002, titled: A.
  • Rossouw, Kosyanaya - Alexander Luria

    Rossouw, Kosyanaya - Alexander Luria

    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265346426 Rossouw, Kosyanaya - Alexander Luria Dataset · September 2014 CITATIONS READS 0 23 2 authors: Maria Kostyanaya Pieter Rossouw Queensland Government Central Queensland University; The Neurop… 8 PUBLICATIONS 4 CITATIONS 83 PUBLICATIONS 133 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Developing capacity in a compromised environment. A forensic study from a neurobiological perspective. View project Developing capacity in a compromised environment. A forensic study from a neurobiological perspective. View project All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, Available from: Pieter Rossouw letting you access and read them immediately. Retrieved on: 07 October 2016 perspectives alexander luria: life, research & contribution to neuroscience. Maria Ilmarovna Kostyanaya The University of Queensland Pieter Rossouw School of Psychology, School of Social Work and Human Services The University of Queensland Abstract This article focuses on the Soviet psychologist and founder of Russian neuropsychology, Alexander Romanovich Luria, and his contribution to the development of neuroscience globally. The article be- gins with a short biography, with particular focus on the formation of Luria’s theoretical views. Key as- pects of theory concerning the structural and functional organization of the brain are then discussed, including Luria’s ideas on the three principal functional units and the interaction between them. In conclusion, Luria’s scientific ideas are compared to developments in contemporary research. Key words: Luria, neuropsychology, Russian neuropsychology, principal functional units, neuroscience, neuropsychotherapy. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to : Dr.
  • The Wisdom Paradox: How Your Mind Can Grow Stronger As Your Brain Grows Older

    The Wisdom Paradox: How Your Mind Can Grow Stronger As Your Brain Grows Older

    Wisdom and the Second Half of Life Books discussed: The Wisdom Paradox: How Your Mind Can Grow Stronger as Your Brain Grows Older. By Elkhonon Goldberg. New York: Gotham Books, 2005. viii + 336. $26 (cloth), $15 (paper) The Mature Mind: The Positive Power of the Aging Brain. By Gene Cohen. New York: Basic Books, 2005. xxiii + 232 pp. $24.95 (cloth), $15.95 (paper). I've always been absent-minded. From the beginning of grammar school I received demerits on my report card for daydreaming. When my eldest child was twelve or so, he began to complain about what he called my “dimwit autopilot.” The younger two children seized the label with great glee, and I’ve never lived it down. Nonetheless, I find myself worrying these days when I forget something, when I lose something, when I walk down to the basement and then wonder, "what was I after?" These days, when my mind wanders off, I worry: will it come back? Or am I losing it altogether? As an anxiously aging Boomer, then, I’ve been doing what I do best in any crisis: drinking tea and reading books. I’m pleased to report that my neurotic concerns are in fact plainly neurotic: research in the last ten or fifteen years has dramatically challenged the commonplace popular view of the aging process and especially the aging brain. The implications for our lives are both complex and profound. The major new fact is this: quite contrary to what was thought even ten years ago, the brain continues to grow new cells and to develop new physical capacities across the entire life span.
  • Fundamentals of Computational Neuroscience

    Fundamentals of Computational Neuroscience

    0 Computational Neuroscience • Introduction • About me : Olivier Manette 1 Dreamspeed Project www.flod.aero 2 Some recent bibliography 30 Janvier 2014 Livre, Presse Académique Francophone Codage spatio-temporel des neurones cortico-motoneuronaux: ou comment le cerveau parle à nos muscles? •ISBN-13: 978-3841622709 Février 2009 Chapitre dans Livre, Theory and Novel Applications of Machine Learning, I-Tech, Vienna TempUnit: A bio-inspired spiking Neural Network? •ISBN-13: 978-3-902613-55-4, pp. 376 Aout 2013 Proceeding of: Neuroinformatics 2013, At Stockholm, Sweden HELMHOLTZ: A CUSTOMIZABLE FRAMEWORK FOR NEUROPHYSIOLOGY DATA MANAGEMENT •Andrew P. Davison, Thierry Brizzi, Domenico Guarino, Olivier F. Manette, Cyril Monier, Gerard Sadoc, Yves Fregnac Juillet 2011 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, San Jose 2011 TEMPORAL AND RATE DECODING IN SPIKING NEURONS WITH DENDRITES •Olivier F. Manette Juillet 2011 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, San Jose 2011 LOCAL LEARNING RULES FOR SPIKING NEURONS WITH DENDRITE •Olivier F. Manette Juin 2011 International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility, Stockholm, 2011 SPEEDING 100 FOLD NEURAL NETWORK SIMULATIONS WITH GPU PROCESSING •Olivier F. Manette, German Hernandez 3 What is Computational Neuroscience? Computational Neuroscience is the theoretical study of the brain to uncover the principles and mechanisms that guide the development, organization, information processing and mental abilities of the nervous system. 4 Computational/theoretical tools in context 5 EEG and fMRI
  • Internationalism in Psychology: We Need It Cole, M., Gay, J., Glick, J

    Internationalism in Psychology: We Need It Cole, M., Gay, J., Glick, J

    psychology as a profession and set out for graduate Gay, J., & Cole, M. (1967). The new mathematics and an school—both for him and for the world. old culture. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Selected Bibliography Luria, A. R. (1971). Towards the problem of the historical nature of psychological processes (M. Cole, Trans.). Inter- Cole, M. (Ed.). (1976). Forward. In A. R. Luria, Cognitive national Journal of Psychology, 6(4), 259–272. development: Its cultural and social foundations (pp. xi– xvi). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construc- tion zone: Working for cognitive change in school. New Cole, M. (1988). Cross-cultural research in the socio-his- York: Cambridge University Press. torical tradition. Human Development, 31, 147–157. Nissim-Sabat, D., Cole, M., & Belyaeva, A. V. (1997). Telecommunications in the former Soviet Union: Activities Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future in psychology. European Psychologist, 2(1), 52–58. discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of liter- Cole, M. (1998). Can cultural psychology help us think acy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. about diversity? Mind, Culture and Activity, 5, 291–304. Sharp, D., Cole, M., & Lave, J. (1979). Education and cog- Cole, M., & Cole, S. (1989). The development of children. nitive development: The evidence from experimental re- New York: Scientific American Press. search. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 44(1–2, Serial No. 178). Cole, M., Dore, J., Hall, W. S., & Dowley, G. (1978). Sit- uational variability in the speech of preschool children.
  • Sociocultural Factors in Brazilian Neuropsycholinguistic Studies

    Sociocultural Factors in Brazilian Neuropsycholinguistic Studies

    Psychology & Neuroscience, 2012, 5, 2, 125 - 133 DOI: 10.3922/j.psns.2012.2.02 Sociocultural factors in Brazilian neuropsycholinguistic studies Maria Alice de Mattos Pimenta Parente,1 Maria Teresa Carthery-Goulart,1 Nicolle Zimmermann,2 Rochele Paz Fonseca2 1 – Universidade Federal do ABC, Santo André, SP, Brazil 2 – Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil Abstract The history of Brazilian neuropsychology is traced at different neuropsycholinguistic stages with a focus on the importance of sociocultural factors. We first focus on language disorders, the sequelae of injuries in the left hemisphere, and neuropsychology restricted to the medical field in Europe, the United States, and Brazil. In the middle of the last century, attention to the interdisciplinary importance of studies on the right hemisphere began. Studies consequently emerged on the individual variability of brain function with both biological and cultural origins. Based on this approach, Brazilian studies on aphasic children and illiterate aphasic persons were disseminated internationally. In the 1970s, cognitive neuropsychology began in England, highlighting dysfunctions in reading and writing processes. The characteristics of writing systems within each language became relevant for the manifestations of acquired dyslexia. Brazilian studies showed deficits in Portuguese and Japanese writing caused by brain lesions. During this scientific journey, scientific societies and postgraduate programs in Brazil were created to facilitate exchanges and communication among young researchers. By the end of the last century and in the early 2000s, the growth of the neuropsychology of aging raised awareness of the complexity of sociocultural factors, not only on language research but also according to the level of education, frequency of reading and writing habits, school type, and interactions among these factors and biological factors, especially between the level of education and age.
  • Adolescent Brain Development

    Adolescent Brain Development

    ADOLESCENT BRAIN DEVELOPMENT Adolescence is a period of physical, mental, and Youth, even in their late teens, do not have emotional development, generally occurring the same ability as adults to make mature between the ages of 12 and 18, often accompanied decisions. by distinct behavioral changes.¹ Engaging in reckless actions during adolescence is Neuroscience research shows that there are socially normative behavior.⁹ However, although physical differences between the brains of crimes peak around late adolescence, they begin a adults and youth. steep decline into adulthood.¹⁰ It is harder for adolescents to exercise self-control According to recent findings, the human brain does than it is for adults.¹¹ In fact, it is unreasonable to not reach full maturity until at least the mid-20s.² expect that people younger than 18 will have a fully The specific changes that follow young adulthood are formed ability to resist impulses.¹² not yet well studied, but it is known that they involve Adolescents and adults think differently in terms of increased myelination and continued adding and risks and rewards when considering alternative pruning of neurons.³ choices. In particular, because of shifts in dopamine The prefrontal cortex of the brain is crucial for production, kids are more likely to place greater weighing risk vs. reward, future planning, impulse weight on rewards than on risks when making such a control, and is critical for a person to be able to make choice.¹³ This type of decision-making is likely to lead rational decisions.⁴ However, it is one of the last parts to risky behaviors.¹⁴ of the brain to develop and is still not fully mature by Adolescents are less likely to consider the long-term late adolescence.⁵ consequences of the actions they choose because The limbic system, which assists in processing and their capacity for thinking and planning for the future managing emotions, is still maturing during is still developing.¹⁵ adolescence.