India – Haryana – Indian National Lok Dal – Congress Party – Political Violence – Kumari Shelja – State Protection

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

India – Haryana – Indian National Lok Dal – Congress Party – Political Violence – Kumari Shelja – State Protection Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: IND34729 Country: India Date: 29 April 2009 Keywords: India – Haryana – Indian National Lok Dal – Congress Party – Political violence – Kumari Shelja – State protection This response was prepared by the Research & Information Services Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. This research response may not, under any circumstance, be cited in a decision or any other document. Anyone wishing to use this information may only cite the primary source material contained herein. Questions 1. Please provide information on the current leadership and activities of the Indian National Lok Dal (INLD) in Haryana. 2. Have there been any reports of INLD supporters in Haryana being targeted or harmed by Congress Party supporters? 3. Please provide any available information on the politician Kumari Shelja, her history and her activities. 4. To what extent is state protection available to members of the INLD and others in Haryana who experience political violence? RESPONSE 1. Please provide information on the current leadership and activities of the Indian National Lok Dal (INLD) in Haryana. The Indian National Lok Dal (INLD) in Haryana is led by former chief minister Om Prakash Chautala. In order to challenge the ruling Congress party in the 2009 Lok Sabha elections, the INLD has formed a new alliance with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), following the disbandment of the previous INLD-BJP alliance in the 2004 elections, which had negative political consequences for both parties: …In the outgoing Lok Sabha, the Congress had nine seats while the Sonipat seat was won by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). That election result had come almost one year before the Congress government came into power with a thumping three-fourth majority in the 90-member assembly. Repeating or bettering the nine out of 10 Lok Sabha seats performance of 2004 will not be an easy task for the Congress this time. The Congress had polled over 42 percent votes in the 2004 general elections while it got 42.46 percent votes in the 2005 assembly polls. "We will win all the 10 seats this time. Our government has been development and people oriented. The state has not seen so much change in many years," Hooda said. But the opposition alliance of the Indian National Lok Dal (INLD) led by former chief minister Om Prakash Chautala and the BJP have geared themselves to put up a good fight to the Congress. The INLD and BJP, which had been in an alliance prior to the 2004 general elections, had split and both suffered the political consequences. For this general election, both have got together to consolidate their votebank. "We will sweep this election. People are completely fed up with the policies of the Hooda government. This election will be a referendum on the present government," INLD leader Ajay Singh Chautala said (‘Haryana's Lok Sabha battle is for a bigger war’ 2009, Indo-Asian News Service, 20 April – Attachment 1). The polling for the current elections in Haryana will take place on 7 May 2009, and the results are due for release on 16 May 2009 (‘Constituencies: Haryana’ (undated) Indian Elections website http://www.indian-elections.com/haryana/index.html - Accessed 28 April 2009 - Attachment 2). In the current elections, the Indian National Lok Dal (INLD) has nominated five candidates for the Lok Sabha seats it will share with the BJP in Haryana. The INLD- BJP combine will share ten seats, with the BJP announcing nominees for the districts of Ambala, Karnal, Sonepat, Gurgaon and Faridabad; and the INLD nominating candidates for Hisar (former Finance Minister Sampat Singh), Kurukshetra (INLD State President Ashok Arora), Sirsa (Dabwali MLA Sita Ram), Rohtak (Nafe Singh Rathee), and Bhiwani-Mahendragarh (INLD Secretary General Ajay Singh Chautala) (‘INLD announces candidates for 2 LS seats’ 2009, UNI (United News of India), 27 March – Attachment 3; Ahuja, R. 2009, ‘INLD names candidates for polls’, The Hindu, 30 March – Attachment 4; ‘210 in fray for 10 seats in Haryana’ 2009, The Hindu, 23 April – Attachment 5). An article dated 23 April 2009 indicates that INLD candidate for Kurukshetra, Ashok Arora, may be a strong contender for the Parliamentary seat, which has previously been thought of as “a safe seat for Congress.” INLD is giving a tough fight to Congress in the prestigious Kurukshetra constituency which was considered a safe seat for Congress. After the withdrawal of nominations there are 14 candidates left to fight out the elections for Kurukshetra Parliamentary seat. These include sitting MP Navin Jindal of Congress Ashok Arora President of state unit of INLD, Jaswant Singh of Haryana Congress (BL) Gurdial Sinfgh Saini of BSP Shri Pardhan of Samajwadi Party and 9 independent candidates. The main fight is between Ashok Arora of INLD and sitting MP Naveen Jindal of Congress. The other candidates of political parties and independents do not stand any chance to win the seat but they can damage the chances of main contenders. …Ashok Arora is highlighting the water and power problems being faced by the residents in the last five years. He is also highlighting the work done by him as transport Minister in Chutala Government. He claims that that in the present Congress regime no one from area got any job in Government department. [H]e is touring dozens of villages every day. Sources in INLD say that Kailasho Devi ex MP, who had been keeping aloof from the party activities after she was denied the ticket, has now come out in full support of the party candidate Ashok Arora. Sainis are in a large number in the constituency and their support is crucial for any party to do well (Gupta, V. K. 2009, ‘INLD gives tough time to Congress in Kurukshetra’, Punjab Newsline, 23 April http://www.punjabnewsline.com/content/view/16194/ - Accessed 28 April 2009 – Attachment 6). INLD Secretary General Ajay Singh Chautala, grandson of former deputy Prime Minister, the late Devi Lal, is considered to be “a mass leader to reckon with” who “is nowadays becoming the first choice of the public of State in campaigning and rallies” (‘Ajay Chautala emerges as star campaigner for INLD-BJP’ 2009, The Pioneer, 1 March – Attachment 7). Also the son of former Haryana chief minister Om Prakash Chautala, Ajay Chautala was instrumental in the organization of the INLD’s month long 600km protest march, which aimed to emphasise the INLD’s opposition to the ruling Congress government in Haryana. Ajay believes that the Congress party’s rule in Haryana has resulted in “mayhem prevailing in the state. Police is engaging in fake encounters, killing innocent people and indulging in various corrupt activities. The government is also busy in accumulating money by grabbing poor farmers' land, imposing new and increased taxes” (‘Indian National Lok Dal to start anti- government march’ 2009, India Info website, 11 January http://news.indiainfo.com/2009/01/11/0901111452_indian_national_lok_dal_start_ant i-government_march.html - Accessed 24 April 2009 - Attachment 8). On completion of the 30-day foot march, the INLD demanded the dismissal of the Congress government: Haryana’s main opposition Indian National Lok Dal (INLD) Thursday ended its 30- day, 600-km foot march across the state and its chief Ajay Chautala submitted a memorandum to Governor A.R. Kidwai, demanding dismissal of the Congress government. Ajay Chautala, INLD secretary general and son of former chief minister Om Parkash Chautala, was accompanied by over 50 supporters as he reached the Raj Bhawan and met the governor. “We have urged the governor to dismiss the government of Bhupinder Singh Hooda with immediate effect. We have made him aware of the mayhem prevailing all over the state under the Congress rule,” Ajay Chautala told mediapersons outside the Raj Bhawan. The Jan Akrosh Padyatra, or march to give voice to people’s resentment, covered 11 districts. It was organised by INLD in collaboration with the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) to protest against the state government. With the culmination of the foot march, a massive rally was organised later Thursday. It will be addressed by NDA leaders including Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) president Rajnath Singh, Janata Dal-United (JD-U) chief Sharad Yadav, and Punjab Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal apart from Om Parkash Chautala. Party supporters from across Haryana started gathering at the venue of the rally here since early morning. “We are expecting nearly 100,000 people at the rally. It could be the biggest rally in the history of Haryana,” INLD spokesman Ram Brar told IANS” (‘INLD completes foot march, demands Hooda government’s dismissal’ 2009, Thaindian News, 12 February http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/uncategorized/inld-completes-foot- march-demands-hooda-governments-dismissal_100154239.html - Accessed 24 April 2009 – Attachment 9). In addition, the INLD launched a new campaign in Haryana in March, which aimed to “reach out” to all voters in the districts of Haryana. The INLD leaders who have been placed in charge of the campaign in various districts are outlined in the following article: The opposition Indian National Lok Dal (INLD) has decided to start its campaign for the Lok Sabha elections in the state by launching a “Chalo matdata ki or” (let’s go to the voters) from March 12. …INLD president Ashok Arora said under the election campaign, the party will try to reach out to each and every voter in all the districts and Vidhan Sabha constituencies of the state. Under this plan, separate party coordinators have been named to lead the election campaign.
Recommended publications
  • District Wise Skill Gap Study for the State of Haryana.Pdf
    District wise skill gap study for the State of Haryana Contents 1 Report Structure 4 2 Acknowledgement 5 3 Study Objectives 6 4 Approach and Methodology 7 5 Growth of Human Capital in Haryana 16 6 Labour Force Distribution in the State 45 7 Estimated labour force composition in 2017 & 2022 48 8 Migration Situation in the State 51 9 Incremental Manpower Requirements 53 10 Human Resource Development 61 11 Skill Training through Government Endowments 69 12 Estimated Training Capacity Gap in Haryana 71 13 Youth Aspirations in Haryana 74 14 Institutional Challenges in Skill Development 78 15 Workforce Related Issues faced by the industry 80 16 Institutional Recommendations for Skill Development in the State 81 17 District Wise Skill Gap Assessment 87 17.1. Skill Gap Assessment of Ambala District 87 17.2. Skill Gap Assessment of Bhiwani District 101 17.3. Skill Gap Assessment of Fatehabad District 115 17.4. Skill Gap Assessment of Faridabad District 129 2 17.5. Skill Gap Assessment of Gurgaon District 143 17.6. Skill Gap Assessment of Hisar District 158 17.7. Skill Gap Assessment of Jhajjar District 172 17.8. Skill Gap Assessment of Jind District 186 17.9. Skill Gap Assessment of Kaithal District 199 17.10. Skill Gap Assessment of Karnal District 213 17.11. Skill Gap Assessment of Kurukshetra District 227 17.12. Skill Gap Assessment of Mahendragarh District 242 17.13. Skill Gap Assessment of Mewat District 255 17.14. Skill Gap Assessment of Palwal District 268 17.15. Skill Gap Assessment of Panchkula District 280 17.16.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 43 Electoral Statistics
    CHAPTER 43 ELECTORAL STATISTICS 43.1 India is a constitutional democracy with a parliamentary system of government, and at the heart of the system is a commitment to hold regular, free and fair elections. These elections determine the composition of the Government, the membership of the two houses of parliament, the state and union territory legislative assemblies, and the Presidency and vice-presidency. Elections are conducted according to the constitutional provisions, supplemented by laws made by Parliament. The major laws are Representation of the People Act, 1950, which mainly deals with the preparation and revision of electoral rolls, the Representation of the People Act, 1951 which deals, in detail, with all aspects of conduct of elections and post election disputes. 43.2 The Election Commission of India is an autonomous, quasi-judiciary constitutional body of India. Its mission is to conduct free and fair elections in India. It was established on 25 January, 1950 under Article 324 of the Constitution of India. Since establishment of Election Commission of India, free and fair elections have been held at regular intervals as per the principles enshrined in the Constitution, Electoral Laws and System. The Constitution of India has vested in the Election Commission of India the superintendence, direction and control of the entire process for conduct of elections to Parliament and Legislature of every State and to the offices of President and Vice- President of India. The Election Commission is headed by the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners. There was just one Chief Election Commissioner till October, 1989. In 1989, two Election Commissioners were appointed, but were removed again in January 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Ccizo,S171 Ff-Qr-4'R Ft9ft
    fl6cril) z4i, 6 1-1-cicirl 1 \31-1 ,i6ct)1 ff-q-r-4'r Trft- : -cpTTO 11(2)/ ft9fT: 09g_ / Rt141:— Selection on the post of GROUP-D against advt. No. 4/2018 Cat. No. 1 Recommendation there of. 6RiIuiI cp4tii) W.1-1 3171)71 f T I IIcP 21.01.2019 754 \i1Nc J f ft-9-f- 22.01.2019. foR-4 Till7-rr-T A coil-c401 -q-49- 3171)7, Litictot cr\-) u s-+-1l HSSC/Confd./Recomm/2019/1130 ft91-T 21.01.2019 .g171- '1C1 C-t)I cf)) -f4zjir 7rt Tzr17 N k). -c11\3-11 c1 -To--Q 31-m--1 Q-Itc) t:— Sr. Sr. No. as Roll No. Cat. C-Name Gender Address No. per HSSC F-Name 1 32 4182498985 BCB DINESH M SHIV MANDIR City: Against SURESH KUMAR GARHI, Tehsil: General MAHENDRAGARH, Distt: Mahendragarh, Pin:123029, State Haryana 2 45 4182712995 VH JAGDISH M VILL-DADHI BANA, PO- RAM SWAROOP ADAMPUR DADHI, City: DADHI BANA. Tehsil:CHARKHI DADRI; Distt: CHARKHI DADRI, PIN-127310 , State Haryana. 3 49 4181212049 BCB RAKESH M VPO KAMANIA City: YADAV KAMANIA, Tehsil: RAJENDER NANGAL CHOUDHARY, KUMAR Distt: Mahendragarh, Pin:123023, State Haryana 4 55 4181832976 BCB AMIT KUMAR M H.NO.381 City: VILLAGE ARJUN SINGH BIGOPUR POST DHOLERA, Tehsil: NANGAL CHOUDHARY, Distt: Mahendragarh, Pin:123023, State Haryana. 5 56 4182567461 BCB BALKESH M VILLAGE BEGPUR POST RAJ KUMAR OFFICE ATELI TEHSIL ATELI City: ATELI, Tehsil:ATELI, Distt: Mahendragarh, Pin:123021, State Haryana 6 86 4182011989 BCA PAWAN KUMAR M C/O RK TAILOR THANA cciZo,S171 VERMA ROAD ATEL1 MANDI RAVI SHANKAR CITY: ATELI MANDI, TEHSIL: ATELI MANDI, DISTT: MAHENDRAGARH, PIN: 123021, STATE HARYANA.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Supplement Part I: Individual-Level Analysis
    ONLINE SUPPLEMENT PART I: INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL ANALYSIS SECTION 1: DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS AND SUBSTANTIVE EFFECTS TABLE S.1: DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS FOR VOTER ANALYSIS (UPPER CASTE SAMPLE) TABLE S.2: DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS FOR VOTER ANALYSIS (DALIT AND ADIVASI SAMPLE) TABLE S.3: VARIABLES USED IN VOTER-LEVEL ANALYSIS TABLE S.4: SHIFTS IN SIMULATED PROBABILITY OF BJP SUPPORT AMONG DALITS AND ADIVASIS (ESTIMATED FROM MODELS REPORTED IN TABLE 1) TABLE S.5: SHIFTS IN SIMULATED PROBABILITY OF SUPPORTING BJP AMONG UPPER CASTES (ESTIMATED FROM MODELS REPORTED IN TABLE 1) SECTION 2: BASIC ROBUSTNESS CHECKS TABLE S.6: NO COLLINEARITY BETWEEN EXPLANATORY VARIABLES IN INDIVIDUAL- LEVEL SAMPLES FIGURE S1: ACCOUNTING FOR INFLUENTIAL OBSERVATIONS TABLE S.7: RESULTS AMONG NON-ELITES ARE ROBUST TO EXCLUDING HIGH INFLUENCE OBSERVATIONS TABLE S.8: RESULTS AMONG ELITES ARE ROBUST TO EXCLUDING HIGH INFLUENCE OBSERVATIONS (UPPER CASTE SAMPLE) TABLE S.9: MEMBERSHIP EFFECTS ARE ROBUST TO SEPARATELY CONTROLLING FOR INDIVIDUAL POTENTIAL CONFOUNDERS (NON-ELITES) TABLE S.10: RESULTS ARE ROBUST REMAIN TO SEPARATELY CONTROLLING FOR INDIVIDUAL POTENTIAL CONFOUNDERS (ELITES) TABLE S.11: RESULTS ARE NOT AFFECTED BY CONTROLLING FOR ADDITIONAL POLICY MEASURE: (BJP OPPOSITION TO CASTE-BASED RESERVATIONS) TABLE S.12: RESULTS ARE NOT AFFECTED BY INCLUDING ADDITIONAL IDEOLOGICAL POLICY MEASURE: (SUPPORT FOR BANNING RELIGIOUS CONVERSIONS) SECTION 3: CONTROLLING FOR VOTER OPINIONS OF POLITICAL PARTIES SECTION 3A: VIEWS OF BJP PERFORMANCE TABLE S.13A: RESULTS ARE ROBUST TO CONTROLLING FOR PERSONAL SATISFACTION WITH BJP-LED CENTRAL GOVERNMENT AND POCKETBOOK INCREASES DURING BJP TENURE (NON-ELITES) 1 TABLE S.13B: RESULTS ARE ROBUST TO CONTROLLING FOR PERSONAL SATISFACTION WITH BJP-LED CENTRAL GOVERNMENT AND POCKETBOOK INCREASES DURING BJP TENURE (ELITE SAMPLE) SECTION 3B: PARTY RATINGS: BJP VS.
    [Show full text]
  • Maharashtra Election Dates 2020 Schedule Pdf
    Maharashtra election dates 2020 schedule pdf Continue Elections to the Maharashtra State Legislature 2019 ← October 21, 2019, 2024 → All 288 seats in the Maharashtra State Legislative Assembly 145 seats needed for a majority #Surveyscbrjjoc. L and Opinion Polls: Turnout61.44% (1.94%) Minority Party Minority Party Third Party Leader Devendra Fadnavis Uddhav Thackeray Ajit Pawar Party BJP SHS NCP Leader seat Nagpur southwest Baramati Last election 122 27.81% 63 19.35% 41 17.2% Seat won 1 105 56 54 Place Changes 17 7 13 Percent 25.75% 16.41% 16.7% Alliance before NDA NDA UPA Alliance After NDA MVA MVA Fourth Party Leader of the Sixth Party Balasaheb Torat Raj Thackeray Wa Rice Patan Party INC MNS AIMIM Leader seat Sangamner Byculla (lost) Last election 42 18.0% 1 2 Seats won 44 1 2 Seat changes 2 Percent 15.9% 2.3% 1.34% Alliance before UPA Alliance after MVA Map Showing the results of the elections to the Legislative Assembly of the State of Maharashtra 2019 Chief Minister before the election of Devendra Fadnavis BJP Elected Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis BJP Uddhav Thackeray Shiv SenaMaha Vikas Agadi Seat share Maharashtra Legislative Assembly elections 2019 BJP (105) , SS (56), NCP (54), INC (44), BVA (3), AIMIM (2), PJP (2), SP (2), KSP (1), PWP (1), SSS (1), RSP (1), JSS (1), CPI (M) (1), MNS (1), Ind. (13) Elections to the Maharashtra State Legislature in 2019 were held on October 21, 2019, to elect all 288 members of the State Legislature. After a 61.4% turnout, the ruling National Democratic Alliance (NDA) of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Shiv Sena (SHS) won the majority of the vote.
    [Show full text]
  • MP Deepender Singh Hooda MP Arjun Ram Meghwal
    INDIAN LEADERS PROGRAM, FOURTH EDITION ‐ MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT May 31st to June 5th 2015, Madrid and Barcelona SPAIN‐INDIA COUNCIL FOUNDATION MP Deepender Singh Hooda Deepender Singh Hooda is a third term Member of Parliament for Rohtak in Haryana State constituency, whip of Indian National Congress in Lok Sabha (Lower House of Parliament), National Spokesperson of Indian National Congress. He actively serves as Member of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Energy; and Member of the Ad hoc Committee on Absenteeism of Members in the Parliament. He also leads INC’s Social Media Communications Team. Deepender was first elected to the thirteenth Lok Sabha (in 2005) as an MP from Rohtak (Haryana) at the young age of 27. His unwavering commitment earned him a victory by a record margin (of about 4 and a half Lakh votes) when he sought re‐election to Lok‐ Sabha for the second term in 2009. He continued his winning streak for the third time in 2014 even when his party faced strong anti‐incumbency. Areas of agriculture, energy, India’s economic growth and employment potentials find Deepender's passionate involvement, both in his constituency and at a broader national level. Hooda is a third‐generation Parliamentarian from a family with a rich political heritage extending over four generations. His father, Bhupinder Singh Hooda, was the Chief Minister of Haryana for two terms from Mar 2005 ‐ Oct 2014. Deepender's grandfather, Ranbir Singh was a noted freedom fighter, an eminent parliamentarian and one of the founding fathers of India (by virtue of him being a member of the Constituent Assembly of India (1946‐1950) which was responsible for drafting the Constitution of India).
    [Show full text]
  • List of Participating Political Parties and Abbreviations
    Election Commission of India- State Election, 2008 to the Legislative Assembly Of Rajasthan LIST OF PARTICIPATING POLITICAL PARTIES PARTY TYPE ABBREVIATION PARTY NATIONAL PARTIES 1 . BJP Bharatiya Janata Party 2 . BSP Bahujan Samaj Party 3 . CPI Communist Party of India 4 . CPM Communist Party of India (Marxist) 5 . INC Indian National Congress 6 . NCP Nationalist Congress Party STATE PARTIES - OTHER STATES 7 . AIFB All India Forward Bloc 8 . CPI(ML)(L) Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) (Liberation) 9 . INLD Indian National Lok Dal 10 . JD(S) Janata Dal (Secular) 11 . JD(U) Janata Dal (United) 12 . RLD Rashtriya Lok Dal 13 . SHS Shivsena 14 . SP Samajwadi Party REGISTERED(Unrecognised) PARTIES 15 . ABCD(A) Akhil Bharatiya Congress Dal (Ambedkar) 16 . ABHM Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha 17 . ASP Ambedkar Samaj Party 18 . BHBP Bharatiya Bahujan Party 19 . BJSH Bharatiya Jan Shakti 20 . BRSP Bharatiya Rashtravadi Samanta Party 21 . BRVP Bhartiya Vikas Party 22 . BVVP Buddhiviveki Vikas Party 23 . DBSP Democratic Bharatiya Samaj Party 24 . DKD Dalit Kranti Dal 25 . DND Dharam Nirpeksh Dal 26 . FCI Federal Congress of India 27 . IJP Indian Justice Party 28 . IPC Indian People¿S Congress 29 . JGP Jago Party 30 . LJP Lok Jan Shakti Party 31 . LKPT Lok Paritran 32 . LSWP Loktantrik Samajwadi Party 33 . NLHP National Lokhind Party 34 . NPSF Nationalist People's Front ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS - INDIA (Rajasthan ), 2008 LIST OF PARTICIPATING POLITICAL PARTIES PARTY TYPE ABBREVIATION PARTY REGISTERED(Unrecognised) PARTIES 35 . RDSD Rajasthan Dev Sena Dal 36 . RGD Rashtriya Garib Dal 37 . RJVP Rajasthan Vikas Party 38 . RKSP Rashtriya Krantikari Samajwadi Party 39 . RSD Rashtriya Sawarn Dal 40 .
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Punjab Is Replete with Its Political Parties Entering Into Mergers, Post-Election Coalitions and Pre-Election Alliances
    COALITION POLITICS IN PUNJAB* PRAMOD KUMAR The history of Punjab is replete with its political parties entering into mergers, post-election coalitions and pre-election alliances. Pre-election electoral alliances are a more recent phenomenon, occasional seat adjustments, notwithstanding. While the mergers have been with parties offering a competing support base (Congress and Akalis) the post-election coalition and pre-election alliance have been among parties drawing upon sectional interests. As such there have been two main groupings. One led by the Congress, partnered by the communists, and the other consisting of the Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) has moulded itself to joining any grouping as per its needs. Fringe groups that sprout from time to time, position themselves vis-à-vis the main groups to play the spoiler’s role in the elections. These groups are formed around common minimum programmes which have been used mainly to defend the alliances rather than nurture the ideological basis. For instance, the BJP, in alliance with the Akali Dal, finds it difficult to make the Anti-Terrorist Act, POTA, a main election issue, since the Akalis had been at the receiving end of state repression in the early ‘90s. The Akalis, in alliance with the BJP, cannot revive their anti-Centre political plank. And the Congress finds it difficult to talk about economic liberalisation, as it has to take into account the sensitivities of its main ally, the CPI, which has campaigned against the WTO regime. The implications of this situation can be better understood by recalling the politics that has led to these alliances.
    [Show full text]
  • Unions Reject Govt Offer to Setup Committee
    Page-1- 2_Layout 1 01-12-2020 22:57 Page 1 TOPDELHI, UP www.topstory.online STORYwww.topstorypaper.com www.facebook.com/topstorypaper DELHI, WEDNESDAY 02 DECEMBER 2020 VOL-07, ISSUE - 235, PAGES - 8, PRICE RS 2.00 Jacqueline Fernandez Joins China says Delhi SCO BCCI secy Jay Shah The Cast Of Akshay Kumar­ Heads of Govt meet sent visits PCA's new Starrer Bachchan Pandey many 'positive signals' stadium at Mullanpur FILM PAGE­8 WORLD PAGE-7 SPORTS PAGE­6 FARMERS' PROTESTS AGAINST FARM LAW 3 DELHI Govt will reach a Delhi's air Unions reject Govt offer to setup solution after discussing quality their issues, Tomar says remains committee; talks remain inconclusive before meeting farmers New Delhi 'very poor' he government on n The meeting remained inconclusive and the government has called for another Tuesday expressed confidence that it UP­STATE round of discussions on Thursday, December 3, union leaders said 5 Twould reach a solu- New Delhi the issues and wanted the tion after discussing issues Rawat releases he government on farmer representatives to raised by protesting farm- dash board Tuesday offered to further consider the pro- ers, as a meeting got under prepared for set up a committee posal way between union minis- Tto look into issues Sources said the minis- ters and representatives of monitoring SDG raised by farmers protesting ters were of the view that it over 30 farmer organisa- against new farm laws, but was difficult to reach a deci- tions. it was rejected by represen- sion while interacting with For the meeting at Vi- tatives
    [Show full text]
  • Abhay Singh Chautala … Appellant Versus
    1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1257 OF 2011 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 7384 of 2010) Abhay Singh Chautala … Appellant Versus C.B.I. … Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1258 OF 2011 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 7428 of 2010) Ajay Singh Chautala … Appellant Versus C.B.I. … Respondent J U D G M E N T V.S. SIRPURKAR, J. 1. This judgment will dispose of two Special Leave Petitions, they being SLP (Crl.) No. 7384 of 2010 and SLP (Crl.) No. 7428 of 2010. While Abhay Singh Chautala is the petitioner in the first Special Leave Petition, the second one has been filed by Shri Ajay Singh Chautala. The question involved is identical in both the SLPs and hence they are being disposed of by a common judgment. 2. Leave granted in both the Special Leave Petitions. 3. Whether the sanction under Section 19 of The Prevention of Corruption Act (hereinafter called “the Act” for short) was necessary against both the appellants and, therefore, whether the trial which is in progress against both of them, a valid trial, is common question. This question was raised before the 2 Special Judge, CBI before whom the appellants are being tried for the offences under Sections 13(1) (e) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act read with Section 109 of Indian Penal Code in separate trials. 4. Separate charge sheets were filed against both the appellants for the aforementioned offences by the CBI. It was alleged that both the accused while working as the Members of Legislative Assembly had accumulated wealth disproportionate to their known sources of income.
    [Show full text]
  • Haryana Vidhan Sbha
    HARYANA VIDHAN SBHA RESUME OF BUSINESS TRANSACTED BY THE TWELFTH HARYANA VIDHAN SABHA DURING THE SEVENTH (AUGUST) SESSION, 2012 WITH APPENDIX CONTAINING DAILY BULLETINS HARYANA VIDHAN SABHA SECRETRARIAT CHANDIGARH AUGUST, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Sr. Subject Page 1 Statement regarding Council of Minister 1 etc. 2 Statement regarding party position 3 3 Summoning, Sitting and Prorogation of 4 the Haryana Vidhan Sabha 4 Leave of Absence 5 5 Programme observed 6 6 Panel of Chairpersons 12 7 Committees 13 8 References 26 9 Financial Business 34 10 Legislation 36 11 Synopsis of the Bills 40 12 Resolution 43 Non-official - 13 Report presented/Laid 44 14 Paper presented/Laid/Re-laid 45 15 Adjournment Motion 47 16 Calling Attention Notices Under Rule 73 49 17 Short Duration Discussion Notice Under 54 Rule 73-A 18 Statement made by the Ministers 56 19 Comparative statement of speeches made 57 and time taken thereon 20 Figures relating to Questions 58 21 Question statement 59 22 Statement Showing the Date-wise Number 60 of Starred Questions Answered/not put/Postponed 23 Statement showing the date-wise number 61 of Starred Question deemed to have been answered Under Rule 45(1) 24 Statement showing the number of Starred 62 question in the name of Different Ministers date-wise. 25 Walk-outs 63 26 Ruling of the Speaker Regarding the issue 64 of castist remarks made against Sh. Jaiveer Balmiki, Chief Parliamentary Secretary by Sh. Abhey Singh Chautala, M.L.A. 27 Appendix 65 Bulletins Seventh (August) Session, 2012 - PERFACE The following pages contain Resume of Business transacted by the Twelfth Vidhan Sabha during its Seventh Session held from 24 August, 2012 to 28th August, 2012, togetherwith the Bulletins issued daily after the adjournment of each sitting of the Sabha.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 7 India | Freedom House 3/4/2015
    India | Freedom House Page 1 of 7 India freedomhouse.org India held parliamentary (Lok Sabha) elections in nine phases from April 7 to May 12, 2014, with a turnout of some 554 million voters, or 66 percent. Narendra Modi, a three-term chief minister from the western state of Gujarat, led his right-leaning Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and its National Democratic Alliance (NDA) coalition to a decisive victory over the ruling United Progressive Alliance (UPA), headed by Congress Party standard-bearer Rahul Gandhi. The BJP’s success marked the first time a single party won a majority of seats in the Lok Sabha since 1984. Modi formed a government as prime minister on May 26. Modi had been a controversial figure due to his performance as chief minister during the 2002 Gujarat riots, in which more than 1,000 Muslims were killed. A Hindu nationalist, he was accused of complicity in the bloodshed, and some feared communal violence during the 2014 election campaign. There was evidence of a BJP strategy of communal polarization in Uttar Pradesh and Assam states in 2013 and 2014, respectively; divisive speeches by politicians including Modi and his Uttar Pradesh campaign chief Amit Shah, who was promoted to national BJP party president after the elections, were blamed for fueling or capitalizing on deadly communal clashes. Also during the year, censorship of books and social media was a growing concern. Political Rights and Civil Liberties: Political Rights: 35 / 40 (+1) [Key] A. Electoral Process: 12 / 12 (+1) Under the supervision of the Election Commission of India, elections have generally been free and fair.
    [Show full text]