DOCSLIB.ORG

Councillor Submissions to the Hampshire County Council Electoral Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Councillor Submissions to the Hampshire County Council Electoral Review Councillor submissions to the Hampshire County Council electoral review This PDF document contains submissions from Councillors surnames A-Z. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Hinds, Alex From: Mayers, Mishka on behalf of reviews Sent: 11 January 2016 09:11 To: Hinds, Alex Subject: FW: Hampshire County Council -----Original Message----- From: Collett, Cllr A P Sent: 10 January 2016 19:37 To: reviews <[email protected]> Subject: Hampshire County Council Dear Sir/Madam, Whilst I support Hampshire County Council's response to your Draft Recommendations on a new pattern of Divisions with regard to Hart District, I do have one additional major concern that I need to draw to your attention. I agree with Hampshire County Council that: 1. "Blackwater" should be added to the name of the proposed Fleet North & Yateley East Division. I support the desire to keep division names brief, but without "Blackwater" the name will be alien to residents of a large proportion of the division and this will undermine the community interests and identities criterion, with little corresponding benefit to justify leaving it out. 2. It would be better to leave Dogmersfield in the proposed Odiham & Hook Division. Although moving Dogmersfield parish into the proposed Hartley Wintney & Yateley West Division creates a very marginal improvement in electoral equality, this would be at the cost of splitting the Odiham district council ward across the two divisions unnecessarily. Also, given that Winchfield (in the proposed Hartley Wintney & Yateley West Division) has been identified as the proposed location of a new town in the emerging Hart Local Plan, increasing the "starting" electorate of this division unnecessarily would mean that the electorate would exceed the +10% from the average tolerance sooner, and by a greater extent, thereby undermining the electoral equality criteria to a greater extent than the benefit achieved by putting Dogmersfield into this division would justify. 3. The consequential changes to the Yateley parish wards should be based on the recent Community Governance Review rather than the earlier proposals from the Hart District Council ward boundary review, which were never implemented. As the recent CGR has created a local consensus, which meets all three of the Commission's criteria very well, it would be a great shame to go back to the larger, and less community-focussed, wards which were proposed as a consequence of the last Hart District Council ward boundary review. All that is needed is to create the new one-member "Yateley North" parish ward, as proposed by you, and reduce the number of town councillors representing the Yateley Centre ward from three to two. All the other CGR parish wards fit your proposals very neatly. The other area of concern that I have is the proposed boundary between the Fleet Town and the Fleet North & Yateley East divisions. The current proposals clearly meet the electoral equality criterion very well and the use of the railway line as a boundary is obviously attractive, so it is understandable why this has been proposed. The use of this boundary, however, comes at a cost which warrants further consideration. There is an alternative proposal, which is equally good in electoral equality terms, but which avoids the pitfalls of the current proposals and brings several clear advantages. So what is wrong with the current proposal? Firstly, using the railway line as a boundary leads to splitting Elvetham Heath parish between two divisions, with a consequential requirement that the parish be split into two parish wards. This may not seem important, but Elvetham Heath is a new community, which did not exist at all 15-20 years ago and they are working hard to create a united and harmonious identity. What they are achieving is astonishingly good, with many hundreds turning out for community events and the parish council winning all sorts of awards for their creative and successful work on community development. Splitting the parish into two wards brings with it the danger of creating an "us and them" situation, which is so often seen on other councils and which does not exist at the moment. This would fly in the face of both the 1 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Hampshire County Personal Details: Name: Andrew Joy E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Hampshire County Council Feature Annotations Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Map Features: Annotation 1: The outline shown encompasses the contiguous and cohesive community of Alton & Holybourne with the CPs of Chawton and Farringdon. The latter CPs are included solely to appease the LGBCE aversion to 'doughnut' divisions and thus split Alton Rural. Comment text: The outline shown above reflects an attempt to accommodate the LGBCE's open reluctance to accept 'doughnut' divisions by including Chawton CP and Farringdon CP with the existing Alton Town Division. The outline could reasonably include Shalden and/or Lasham in place of Chawton and Farringdon but both alternatives are included for the sole purpose of appeasing the LGBCE's aversion to doughnut divisions. I most strongly advocate retention of the existing Alton Town division WHICH INCLUDES HOLYBOURNE. Electoral equality is highly desirable providing it takes adequate account of the geographical dispersion of the electorate. In this case Alton Rural, with circa 19 rural parishes over some 90 square miles, has not only a very different character to the urban settlement of Alton & Holybourne but requires a very different type of engagement. It is reasonable and justifiable to seek to balance the electoral numbers but this should take proper account of the degree of dispersion of the electorate. Clearly, administration and support of an urban conurbation is logistically and logically more achievable than a widely dispersed and fragmented group of communities. The proposal put forward by the LGBCE achieves electoral equality in numerical terms but in so doing separates Alton and Holybourne. Both are inextricably bound within a single Alton CP boundary, coincident with the Parish Boundary. Holybourne is represented within Alton Town Council and is served necessarily, effectively and conveniently by it. The EHDC ward of Holybourne & Froyle comprises Holybourne, which is contiguous with Alton and wholly urban, with the three rural parishes of Froyle, Lasham and Shalden. Hampshire County Council's response to the proposals counters with a suggestion that Lasham and Shalden CPs are included with Alton Town whilst accepting the concept of removing Holybourne from the Alton Town Division. Again this is solely in response to a perceived determination by the LGBCE to drive a wedge in the apparent doughnut surrounding Alton Town whilst attempting to reduce the impact of the LGBCE proposals. It is worth observing that every division in Hampshire and elsewhere, other than those edged by water, are surrounded by another division or divisions. LBGCE state they are not normally inclined to adopt a doughnut division on the basis that 'such a division pattern is unlikely to reflect community identities and interests or communication links in the rural area'. The rural concerns and interests of the villages are quite distinct from those of the urban settlement of Alton and Holybourne. Alton and Holybourne share effective transport links, are bound by a group of residents' associations and share health, shopping, social and leisure facilities. Both are directly and immediately served by two secondary schools and Alton College. Most importantly, the District ward boundary between Alton and Holybourne, on which the LGBCE proposed Division boundary is based, is indistinct and weak. I suggest that the legal obligation to effect electoral equality can best be achieved in terms of equality of ability to serve the electorate which is based predominantly on numbers but takes account of geographical dispersion and accessibility. As for the statutory criteria to recognise both community identity and interests with effective and convenient local government, the proposals achieve neither. It is concerning that the proposals fail to achieve two of the three statutory criteria. Both Alton Town Council, within which Holybourne is directly represented, and the Holybourne Village Association have unanimously objected to the proposed severance of shared County Council representation. The current arrangement works well and achieves balanced consideration of the needs of both the rural and urban communities. Cllr Andrew Joy Hampshire County Cllr, Alton Town Division Executive Member for Communities, Partnerships & External Affairs Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/6654 11/01/2016 secondary schools and Alton College. Most importantly, the District ward boundary between Alton and Holybourne, on which the proposed Division boundary is based, is indistinct and weak. LGBCE state , in the brief explanatory note, that they are not normally (my italics) inclined to adopt a 'doughnut' division on the basis that 'such a division pattern is unlikely to reflect community identities and interests or communication links in the rural area'. Where such a division pattern is extremely effective, as here, I trust that there is therefore scope for this to be considered. The common rural concerns and interests of the villages are quite distinct from those of the urban settlement of Alton and Holybourne. The proposal to extricate Holybourne from its embedded position within Alton Town appears to serve only one main purpose; to enable a break of the 'doughnut' by combining Alton Town with outlying parishes. The latest HCC proposal to include only Lasham and Shalden parishes within an Alton Town division shorn of its Holybourne ward, moderates the LGBCE proposal somewhat but still cannot overcome the failure to meet two of the three statutory criteria. Having given this long and hard thought, I can currently see only two options: Either 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Newlands News
    Newlands News Newsletter of the Parish Council of Newlands January – March 2020 Issue No. 1 Greetings from the Chair Whether you live in the Parish or, like me, are a Havant resident of Newlands you are part of the community we are trying to build here and will be most welcome at our meetings and events. Remember also that Newlands (Winchester or Havant) is part of Waterlooville and your support for the activities of the Waterlooville Events Team, including the Annual Summer Fete at Jubilee Park, will help to make this a better place to live. Cllr David Crichton Newlands Community Hall Community Matters Our brand new community hall will be On Road Parking available for booking in the next few weeks. If We know that car parking across the Parish you are interested in hiring the main hall can be difficult so please remember to park please email [email protected]. considerately. In particular, take care around the school especially at the end of the school Development News day. Road Adoptions Waste Recycling Centre After completing the Darnel Road resurfacing A reminder that from this year you will need Taylor Wimpey are continuing to work with to register your car or 4x4 with Hampshire Hampshire County Council on remedial works County Council to continue using the and outstanding utility works on Sickle Way. Household Waste Recycling Centres across Adoption is on track for later this year. the county. Inconsiderate Contractors VE Day Celebrations We have received a number reports of The May Bank Holiday has moved to Friday 9 contractors not being considerate to residents May to commemorate the 75th anniversary of including bad parking and mud on the roads.
    [Show full text]
  • Act 1990 LIST of NEW PLANNING and OTHER
    Town and Country Planning Acts 1990 Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Area) Act 1990 LIST OF NEW PLANNING AND OTHER APPLICATIONS, RECEIVED AND VALID IN PARISH/TOWN WARD ORDER WEEKLY LIST AS AT 13 March 2016 For Guidance 1 Those applications which have a star by them are FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. Please see over for a list and description of application types. 2 If the Grid Reference is blank, this is because it is a property which is in the process of being entered on the Property Database for the District. 3 The Conservation Area only appears where the application is known to be in a Conservation Area. 4 Where the application has not been allocated to a case officer, “Team Manager “ for the relevant area appears instead. 5 The Publicity Period is 21 days after the Site Notice Date or 21 days after a Press Advert date, where this has been made, whichever is the later. Applications may be determined after this date. If you require any further information, please enquire at Main Reception, City Offices, Colebrook Street, Winchester, SO23 9LJ quoting the Case Number. We will then be able to give you the current status of the application. We are open Monday to Thursday 8.30am - 5.00pm, Fridays 8.30am - 4.30pm, excluding Bank and Public Holidays. Page 1 APPLICATION CODES AND DESCRIPTION AVC Full Advert Consent AVT Temporary Advert Consent (non-standard time limit) AGA Agricultural Application APN Agricultural Prior Notification CER Certificate of Alternative Use CHU Change of Use DEC Demolition Consultation EUC Established Use
    [Show full text]
  • Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Sincs Hampshire.Pdf
    Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) within Hampshire © Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre No part of this documentHBIC may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recoding or otherwise without the prior permission of the Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Central Grid SINC Ref District SINC Name Ref. SINC Criteria Area (ha) BD0001 Basingstoke & Deane Straits Copse, St. Mary Bourne SU38905040 1A 2.14 BD0002 Basingstoke & Deane Lee's Wood SU39005080 1A 1.99 BD0003 Basingstoke & Deane Great Wallop Hill Copse SU39005200 1A/1B 21.07 BD0004 Basingstoke & Deane Hackwood Copse SU39504950 1A 11.74 BD0005 Basingstoke & Deane Stokehill Farm Down SU39605130 2A 4.02 BD0006 Basingstoke & Deane Juniper Rough SU39605289 2D 1.16 BD0007 Basingstoke & Deane Leafy Grove Copse SU39685080 1A 1.83 BD0008 Basingstoke & Deane Trinley Wood SU39804900 1A 6.58 BD0009 Basingstoke & Deane East Woodhay Down SU39806040 2A 29.57 BD0010 Basingstoke & Deane Ten Acre Brow (East) SU39965580 1A 0.55 BD0011 Basingstoke & Deane Berries Copse SU40106240 1A 2.93 BD0012 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood North SU40305590 1A 3.63 BD0013 Basingstoke & Deane The Oaks Grassland SU40405920 2A 1.12 BD0014 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood South SU40505520 1B 1.87 BD0015 Basingstoke & Deane West Of Codley Copse SU40505680 2D/6A 0.68 BD0016 Basingstoke & Deane Hitchen Copse SU40505850 1A 13.91 BD0017 Basingstoke & Deane Pilot Hill: Field To The South-East SU40505900 2A/6A 4.62
    [Show full text]
  • Widley Widley
    Widley Widley 1.0 PARISH Southwick & Widley (formerley Widley, then Cosham) 2.0 HUNDRED Portsdown 3.0 NGR 465900 107400 4.0 GEOLOGY London Clay; Alluvium to north, Reading Beds to south. 5.0 SITE CONTEXT (Map 2) 5.1 Widley, as a settlement, is almost impossible to identify. There is no longer a parish church and there are no principal buildings with the exception of the C18 Fort Widley, which is adjacent to the northern margin of the B2177. The fort is situated on the east / west ridge of Portsdown (100m AOD) and from this lofty perch it looks down upon Portsmouth to the south. North of Fort Widley the land drops gradually away to the heartland of the former Widley parish. This is a landscape of scattered farmsteads with irregular plantations of mixed woodland beyond, perhaps indicative that this was once a part of the medieval Forest of Bere. 5.2 The recent history of the parish of Widley has been chequered. In 1894, it was amalgamated with Wymering and Cosham to form the parish of Cosham (VCH 3: 171). Subsequently, the greater part Widley parish has been joined with Southwick to become the parish of Southwick and Widley in Winchester City District. 6.0 PLAN TYPE & DESCRIPTION (Maps 3, 4, & 5) Church and farm 6.1.1 Map 1 shows Widley as an odd-shaped parish unit squeezed between Wymering (west) and Cosham (east). The greater part of the C19 parish stretched northwards from the ridge of Portsdown whilst a relatively narrow strip of land gave access to the sea and the littoral marshes.
    [Show full text]
  • Listed Building and Conservation Area) Act 1990
    WINCHESTER CITY COUNCIL DECISIONS MADE BY THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS IN WINCHESTER DISTRICT, PARISH, TOWN AND WARD UP TO 22 February 2015 Town and Country Planning Acts 1990 Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Area) Act 1990 DECISIONS MADE BY DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS UNDER DELEGATED POWERS UP TO 22 February 2015 For Guidance 1. Please note that if you wish to view the full decision details, which include any conditions or reasons for refusal, these can be accessed via the public access facility within the planning area of the council’s web site. The following link will take you to the relevant area where the case can be accessed using the quoted case number on the below list and clicking the ‘associated documents’ tab and searching the documents list for ‘decision’. Similarly the case officer’s report can be viewed in the case of delegated decisions, which explains the considerations taken into account in determining the application. Planning Applications Online Please note that there is a slight delay between the date that a decision is made and the date the decision notice is displayed on the website. The decision notice will be published to the website 2 days after the date of the decision. 2. Reports and minutes of applications determined by the planning committee can be viewed in the committees section of the council’s web site, which can be accessed via the following link. Planning Development Control Committee If you require any further information, please enquire at Planning Reception, City Offices, Colebrook Street, Winchester, SO23 9LJ quoting the Case Number.
    [Show full text]
  • Act 1990 LIST of NEW PLANNING and OTHER
    Town and Country Planning Acts 1990 Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Area) Act 1990 LIST OF NEW PLANNING AND OTHER APPLICATIONS, RECEIVED AND VALID IN PARISH/TOWN WARD ORDER WEEKLY LIST AS AT 27 January 2019 For Guidance 1 Those applications which have a star by them are FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. Please see over for a list and description of application types. 2 If the Grid Reference is blank, this is because it is a property which is in the process of being entered on the Property Database for the District. 3 The Conservation Area only appears where the application is known to be in a Conservation Area . 4 Where the application has not been allocated to a case officer, “Team Manager “ for the relevant area appears instead. 5 The Publicity Period is 21 days after the Site Notice Date or 21 days after a Press Advert date, where this has been made, whichever is the later. Applications may be determined after this date. If you require any further information, please enquire at Main Reception, City Offices, Colebrook Street, Winchester, SO23 9LJ quoting the Case Number. We will then be able to give you the current status of the application. We are open Monday to Thursday 8.30am - 5.00pm, Fridays 8.30am - 4.30pm, excluding Bank and Public Holidays. Page 1 APPLICATION CODES AND DESCRIPTION AVC Full Advert Consent AVT Temporary Advert Consent (non-standard time limit) AGA Agricultural Application APN Agricultural Prior Notification CER Certificate of Alternative Use CHU Change of Use DEC Demolition Consultation EUC Established
    [Show full text]
  • The Postal History of Waterlooville Including Cosham, Widley, Purbrook, Denmead, Hambledon, Cowplain, Lovedean, Horndean and Chalton
    The Postal History of Waterlooville including Cosham, Widley, Purbrook, Denmead, Hambledon, Cowplain, Lovedean, Horndean and Chalton by Mike Hill July 2015 £5 Tourist Map of 1991 showing the locations of Post Offices in the Waterlooville area. 2 Havant Borough History Booklet No. 52 To view, comment, and order all booklets visit: www.hhbkt.com Read also Booklet No. 38: A History of the Post Office in the Havant Area Edited by Ralph Cousins 3 4 The Postal History of Waterlooville including Cosham, Widley, Purbrook, Denmead, Hambledon, Cowplain, Lovedean, Horndean and Chalton Mike Hill Introduction The Waterlooville Philatelic Society was formed at the time of the great stamp collecting boom of the early 1970s and as a founder member I discovered that there was little information about the postal history of the local area since the founding of the village in 1815 some 200 years ago. Thus I was encouraged to start out on a journey of exploration into the history of postal services in the local area, a journey which has given me many hours of enjoyment. What I have achieved has been helped enormously by those of the Waterlooville Philatelic Society notably the late Eric Whyley and Mike English, and also the late Geoffrey Salter of the Waterlooville Library. Much of my research was published in the Journal of the Hampshire Postal History Society of which I was editor for a number of years. I must also thank David Coxon whose father took over from George Pook as postmaster in the early fifties for his memories and Paul Costen [www.costen.co.uk] who allowed me access to his scanned collection of postcards to search for Post Offices.
    [Show full text]
  • Burley Denny Lodge Hursley Overton Minstead Binsted Beaulieu Fawley
    Mortimer Newtown West End East Ashford Hill with Headley Stratfield Saye Silchester Bramshill Woodhay Tadley Stratfield TurgisHeckfield Eversley Highclere Pamber Yateley Burghclere Kingsclere Baughurst BramleyHartley Wespall Mattingley Linkenholt Ecchinswell, Sydmonton Blackwater Faccombe Sherfield on Loddon and Hawley Vernhams and Bishops Green Sherborne St. John Hartley Wintney Ashmansworth Monk Sherborne Sherfield Park Rotherwick Dean Elvetham Heath Litchfield and Woodcott Hannington Chineham Wootton St. Lawrence Hook Fleet Hurstbourne Tarrant Rooksdown Newnham Winchfield Old Basing and Lychpit Church Crookham Dogmersfield Crookham Tangley St. Mary Bourne Mapledurwell and Up Nately Oakley Greywell Village Whitchurch Deane Odiham Ewshot Smannell Overton Winslade Appleshaw Enham Alamein Cliddesden Tunworth Penton Grafton Upton Grey Crondall Kimpton Steventon Charlton Hurstbourne Priors Farleigh Wallop Weston Corbett Fyfield Andover Laverstoke North Waltham Long Sutton Penton Mewsey Ellisfield South Warnborough Shipton Bellinger Dummer Herriard Weston Patrick Bentley Thruxton Amport Longparish Nutley Monxton Popham Froyle Upper Clatford Quarley Abbotts Ann Bradley Lasham Bullington Shalden Grateley Goodworth Clatford Preston Candover Wherwell Binsted Barton Stacey Micheldever Bentworth Wonston Candovers Wield Alton Over Wallop Beech Chilbolton Kingsley Longstock Northington Worldham Leckford Chawton Headley Nether Wallop Medstead South Wonston Old Alresford Lindford Stockbridge Crawley Farringdon Grayshott Bighton Little Somborne Kings
    [Show full text]
  • AQUIND Limited AQUIND INTERCONNECTOR Consultation Report – Appendix 1.4C Statutory Consultation - List of Consultees Consulted Under Section 42(1)(D) PA 2008
    AQUIND Limited AQUIND INTERCONNECTOR Consultation Report – Appendix 1.4C Statutory Consultation - List of Consultees Consulted under Section 42(1)(d) PA 2008 The Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 – Regulation 5(2)(q) Document Ref: 5.1.4C PINS Ref.: EN020022 AQUIND Limited AQUIND Limited AQUIND INTERCONNECTOR Consultation Report – Appendix 1.4 C Statutory Consultation - List of Consultees Consulted under Section 42(1)(d) PA 2008 PINS REF.: EN020022 DOCUMENT: 5.1.4C DATE: 14 NOVEMBER 2019 WSP WSP House 70 Chancery Lane London WC2A 1AF +44 20 7314 5000 www.wsp.com AQUIND Limited Contact Name Address Line 1 Address Line 2 Address Line 3 Address Line 4 Address Line 5 Town County Postcode InternationalPostcode Country Julie Elliott 9, The Gardens Waterlooville PO7 4RR United Kingdom EI Group plc 3 Monkspath Hall Road Shirley Solihull B90 4SJ United Kingdom Highways England Company Limited Care Of The Company Secretary Bridge House 1 Walnut Tree Close Guildford Surrey GU1 4LZ United Kingdom Southern Gas Networks plc St Lawrence House Station Approach Horley Surrey RH6 9HJ United Kingdom Hampshire County Council The Castle Castle Avenue Hants Winchester SO23 8UJ United Kingdom Shell U.K. Limited Shell Centre York Road London SE1 7NA United Kingdom E & L Berg Limited 236 Grays Inn Road London WC1X 8HB United Kingdom Asda Stores Limited Asda House Southbank Great Wilson Street Leeds LS11 5AD United Kingdom Portsmouth City Council c/o Tristan Samuels Director of Regeneration
    [Show full text]
  • 13 the BROW, WIDLEY, WATERLOOVILLE, HANTS. PO7 5BY 3 Bedrooms
    023 9226 2611 www.pearsons.com 13 THE BROW, WIDLEY, WATERLOOVILLE, HANTS. PO7 5BY 3 Bedrooms - £405,000 Freehold Pearsons Southern Ltd Description believe these Superbly presented character home, situated in a highly desirable location. Internally, over recent years the property has been particulars to beautifully restored and configured with a fabulous open plan kitchen/dining room and conservatory to the rear of the house a nd an be correct but early internal viewing is highly recommended. The accommodation has gas heating, double glazing and in brief comprises: their accuracy Entrance hall, sitting room, study/bedroom 4, open plan kitchen/dining room, conservatory. On the first floor, three bedrooms, cannot be family bathroom and en-suite to the master bedroom. Outside, driveway to the front and side, with garage and enclosed guaranteed and they do landscaped garden to the rear. not form part of any Location contract. Located in one of the most popular roads in the area, there are local shops, schools and other amenities in close proximity, including convenient access to the A3(M) and Portsdown Hill. Pearsons Estate Agents 77 London Road , Waterlooville , , Hampshire PO7 7EL 023 9226 2611 www.pearsons.com 13 THE BROW, WIDLEY, WATERLOOVILLE, HANTS. PO7 5BY ENTRANCE HALL BEDROOM TWO Stairs to first floor, radiator, understairs cupboard housing meters Radiator, lead light window to the rear aspect, picture rail and access to and combination boiler. loft. KITCHEN BEDROOM THREE Comprehensively fitted with a range of units comprising, base Double glazed window to side aspect, circular feature window to the front. cupboard and drawer units with wall units over.
    [Show full text]
  • AQUIND Limited AQUIND INTERCONNECTOR Consultation Report – Appendix 1.1G Non- Statutory Consultation – List of Stakeholders Contacted in November 2017
    AQUIND Limited AQUIND INTERCONNECTOR Consultation Report – Appendix 1.1G Non- Statutory Consultation – List of Stakeholders Contacted in November 2017 The Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 – Regulation 5(2)(q) Document Ref: 5.1.1G PINS Ref.: EN020022 AQUIND Limited AQUIND Limited AQUIND INTERCONNECTOR Consultation Report – Appendix 1.1G Non- Statutory Consultation – List of Stakeholders Contacted in November 2017 PINS REF.: EN020022 DOCUMENT: 5.1.1G DATE: 14 NOVEMBER 2019 WSP WSP House 70 Chancery Lane London WC2A 1AF +44 20 7314 5000 www.wsp.com AQUIND Limited Title Address 1 Address 2 Address 3 Address 4 Address 5 Tel Mob Email Councillor Roy c/o Hampshire 01794 Perry County Council The Castle Winchester Hampshire SO23 8UJ 322472 [email protected] Councillor Little Drove 01264 07802 Andrew Gibson Test Valley Farm Road Chibolton SO20 6AN 861138 878248 [email protected] Councillor Rob Thompsons 01962 Humby Hangar Nurseries Lane Owslebury Winchester SO21 1JH 777673 [email protected] Councillor Ashdell 01420 07736 Andrew Joy 26 Huntsmead Park Alton GU34 2SF 85251 461430 [email protected] Councillor Mel Castle Milford on 01962 Kendal Polruan Close Sea Lymington SO41 0QB 847704 [email protected] Councillor Marge Rowlands 02392 07840 Harvey 1 Glen Dale Castle PO9 6EP 413858 694133 [email protected] Councillor David Waterloovil 02392 Keast 57 Topaz Grove le PO7 8ST 230335 [email protected] Councillor Ann 18 Goodwood Waterloovil
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2017 Berewood & Old Park Farm
    Summer 2017 Berewood & Old Park Farm Berewood/Old Park Farm Link Bridge is now OPEN! On Friday 14th July the long awaited, much needed link bridge providing direct road access between Old Park Farm and Berewood development was officially opened by the Mayor of Winchester and the Mayor of Havant, with help from pupils from Berewood Primary School. Watched by local residents and Councillors, the ribbon was cut at the Houghton Avenue end in Berewood then the Mayors drove the short journey down to the Taylor Wimpey link bridge where County Councillor Stallard and Councillor Cutler opened to road to allow them to drive through. The opening of the road is a milestone for the developments, making the journey to school much easier for many families (though we still encourage you to walk or cycle where possible!) and providing a main road route to the Household Waste Recycling Centre. The Great West of Waterlooville Get Together Inside this Edition… A big thank you to all those who joined • Parish Council Update us opposite Berewood School for our th Community Get Together on 17 June. • Berewood Primary The sun was shining, the children were entertained and people enjoyed some School News time to relax and talk with friends and family. Lots of you told us commented • Western Open Space on how much you enjoyed it and we and Play Project News hope to arrange similar events in future. • Residents Meetings Next Community Get Together Update Join us on Sunday 30th July, 2.00 – 4.00pm to celebrate the opening of the Western Open Space, next to Wellington Vale Care Home, off Darnel Road, Old • Waterlooville Pop Up Park Farm.
    [Show full text]