Pest Risk Assessment
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
111 Historical Notes on Whooping Cranes at White
HISTORICAL NOTES ON WHOOPING CRANES AT WHITE LAKE, LOUISIANA: THE JOHN J. LYNCH INTERVIEWS, 1947-1948 GAY M. GOMEZ, Department of Social Sciences, McNeese State University, Box 92335, Lake Charles, LA 70609, USA RODERICK C. DREWIEN, Hornocker Wildlife Institute, University of Idaho, 3346 E 200 N, Rigby, ID 83442, USA MARY LYNCH COURVILLE, John J. Lynch American Natural Heritage Park, 1393 Henderson Highway, Breaux Bridge, LA 70517, USA Abstract: In May 1939 biologist John J. Lynch of the U.S. Bureau of Biological Survey conducted an aerial survey that documented the existence of a non-migratory population of whooping cranes (Grus americana) near White Lake in southwest Louisiana. Lynch found 13 cranes, including 2 pre-fledged young, confirming breeding. Lynch’s survey occurred, in part, because fur trappers and alligator hunters working in the White Lake marshes had informed the biologist of the cranes’ presence and habits. Lynch con- tinued his contacts with these knowledgeable marsh users, and in 1947 and 1948 interviewed at least 7 individuals. In 2001, M. L. Courville, along with her sister Nora Z. Lynch, discovered the interview notes among their father’s papers. The notes contain information on the Louisiana non-migratory population’s range, abundance, habitat use, feeding behavior, nesting, and young, including survival of twins; they also include a small amount of information on sandhill cranes (Grus canadensis) and migratory whooping cranes. Both Lynch and Robert P. Allen relied heavily on this “traditional ecological knowledge” in their accounts of non-migratory whooping cranes in southwest Louisiana. Because of their biological and historical significance, the interview notes are reproduced in this paper. -
Masked Bobwhite (Colinus Virginianus Ridgwayi) 5-Year Review
Masked Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus ridgwayi) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Photograph by Paul Zimmerman U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge Sasabe, AZ March 2014 5-YEAR REVIEW Masked Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus ridgwayi) 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1 Reviewers Lead Regional Office Southwest Region, Region 2, Albuquerque, NM Susan Jacobsen, Chief, Division of Classification and Restoration, 505-248-6641 Wendy Brown, Chief, Branch of Recovery and Restoration, 505-248-6664 Jennifer Smith-Castro, Recovery Biologist, 505-248-6663 Lead Field Office: Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge (BANWR) Sally Gall, Refuge Manager, 520-823-4251 x 102 Juliette Fernandez, Assistant Refuge Manager, 520-823-4251 x 103 Dan Cohan, Wildlife Biologist, 520-823-4351 x 105 Mary Hunnicutt, Wildlife Biologist, 520-823-4251 Cooperating Field Office(s): Arizona Ecological Services Tucson Field Office Jean Calhoun, Assistant Field Supervisor, 520-670-6150 x 223 Mima Falk, Senior Listing Biologist, 520-670-6150 x 225 Scott Richardson, Supervisory Fish and Wildlife Biologist, 520-670-6150 x 242 Mark Crites, Fish and Wildlife Biologist, 520-670-6150 x 229 Arizona Ecological Services Field Office Steve Spangle, Field Supervisor, 602-242-0210 x 244 1.2 Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service or USFWS) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review). -
Wisconsin Bird Nesting Dates for Species Tracked by the Natural
Introduction to the “Wisconsin Bird Nesting Dates (Avoidance Period) for Species Tracked by the Natural Heritage Inventory” The table “Wisconsin Bird Nesting Dates (Avoidance Period) for Species Tracked by the Natural Heritage Inventory” below, provides guidance to DNR staff and external certified reviewers who use the NHI Portal for Endangered Resources reviews. This guidance was developed by a team of Natural Heritage Conservation program staff from DNR using the best available information for species on the Natural Heritage Working List. The Nesting Dates (Avoidance Period) table was developed to help customers comply with State and Federal laws and thus avoid “intentional taking, killing, or possession” of bird nests, eggs, and body parts. For each species, the avoidance dates are the period each year when birds are most vulnerable because there are eggs or flightless chicks in nests. Species tracked by the Natural Heritage Inventory include endangered, threatened and special concern species. Avoidance of these nesting dates is required for endangered and threatened species and recommended (voluntary) for special concern species. For more information on rare bird species, see the Rare Bird webpage. Revised 10/18/2019 https://dnr.wi.gov/topic/endangeredresources/documents/wisbirdnestingcalendar.pdf Wisconsin Bird Avoidance Dates for Species Tracked by the Natural Heritage Inventory Common Name Scientific Name Status Avoidance Dates Acadian Flycatcher Empidonax virescens THR 25 May - 20 Aug American Bittern Botaurus lentiginosus SC/M -
Tinamiformes – Falconiformes
LIST OF THE 2,008 BIRD SPECIES (WITH SCIENTIFIC AND ENGLISH NAMES) KNOWN FROM THE A.O.U. CHECK-LIST AREA. Notes: "(A)" = accidental/casualin A.O.U. area; "(H)" -- recordedin A.O.U. area only from Hawaii; "(I)" = introducedinto A.O.U. area; "(N)" = has not bred in A.O.U. area but occursregularly as nonbreedingvisitor; "?" precedingname = extinct. TINAMIFORMES TINAMIDAE Tinamus major Great Tinamou. Nothocercusbonapartei Highland Tinamou. Crypturellus soui Little Tinamou. Crypturelluscinnamomeus Thicket Tinamou. Crypturellusboucardi Slaty-breastedTinamou. Crypturellus kerriae Choco Tinamou. GAVIIFORMES GAVIIDAE Gavia stellata Red-throated Loon. Gavia arctica Arctic Loon. Gavia pacifica Pacific Loon. Gavia immer Common Loon. Gavia adamsii Yellow-billed Loon. PODICIPEDIFORMES PODICIPEDIDAE Tachybaptusdominicus Least Grebe. Podilymbuspodiceps Pied-billed Grebe. ?Podilymbusgigas Atitlan Grebe. Podicepsauritus Horned Grebe. Podicepsgrisegena Red-neckedGrebe. Podicepsnigricollis Eared Grebe. Aechmophorusoccidentalis Western Grebe. Aechmophorusclarkii Clark's Grebe. PROCELLARIIFORMES DIOMEDEIDAE Thalassarchechlororhynchos Yellow-nosed Albatross. (A) Thalassarchecauta Shy Albatross.(A) Thalassarchemelanophris Black-browed Albatross. (A) Phoebetriapalpebrata Light-mantled Albatross. (A) Diomedea exulans WanderingAlbatross. (A) Phoebastriaimmutabilis Laysan Albatross. Phoebastrianigripes Black-lootedAlbatross. Phoebastriaalbatrus Short-tailedAlbatross. (N) PROCELLARIIDAE Fulmarus glacialis Northern Fulmar. Pterodroma neglecta KermadecPetrel. (A) Pterodroma -
Partridges, Quails, Pheasants and Turkeys Phasianidae Vigors, 1825: Zoological Journal 2: 402 – Type Genus Phasianus Linnaeus, 1758
D .W . .5 / DY a 5D t w[ { wt Ç"" " !W5 í ÇI &'(' / b ù b a L w 5 ! ) " í "* " Ç t+ t " h " * { b ù" t* &)/&0 Order GALLIFORMES: Game Birds and Allies The order of galliform taxa in Checklist Committee (1990) appears to have been based on Peters (1934). Johnsgard (1986) synthesised available data, came up with similar groupings of taxa, and produced a dendrogram indicating that turkeys (Meleagridinae) were the most primitive (outside Cracidae and Megapodiidae), with grouse (Tetraoninae), guineafowl (Numidinae), New World quails (Odontophorinae) and pheasants and kin (Phasianinae) successively more derived. Genetic evidence (DNA-hybridisation data) provided by Sibley & Ahlquist (1990) suggested Odontophorinae were the most basal phasianoids and guineafowl the next most basal group. A basal position of the New World quails among phasianoids has been supported by other genetic data (Kimball et al. 1999, Armstrong et al. 2001). A recent analysis based on morphological characters (Dyke et al. 2003) found support for megapodes as the most basal group in the order, then Cracidae, then Phasianidoidea, and within the latter, Numididae the most basal group. In contrast to the above genetic-based analyses, Dyke et al. (2003) found the Odontophorinae to be the most derived group within the order. A recent analysis using both mitochondrial ND2 and cytochrome-b DNA sequences, however, reinforces the basal position of the Odontophorinae (Pereira & Baker 2006). Here we follow a consensus of the above works and place Odontophorinae basal in the phasianids. Worthy & Holdaway (2002) considered that Cheeseman’s (1891) second-hand record of megapodes from Raoul Island, Kermadec Group, before the 1870 volcanic eruption has veracity. -
Recovery Strategy for the Northern Bobwhite (Colinus Virginianus) in Canada
PROPOSED Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series Recovery Strategy for the Northern Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) in Canada Northern Bobwhite 2017 Recommended citation: Environment and Climate Change Canada. 2017. Recovery Strategy for the Northern Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) in Canada [Proposed]. Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series. Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa. ix + 37 pp. For copies of the recovery strategy, or for additional information on species at risk, including Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) Status Reports, residence descriptions, action plans, and other related recovery documents, please visit the Species at Risk (SAR) Public Registry1. Cover illustration: © Dr. George K. Peck Également disponible en français sous le titre « Programme de rétablissement du Colin de Virginie (Colinus virginianus) au Canada [Proposition] » © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Environment and Climate Change, 2017. All rights reserved. ISBN Catalogue no. Content (excluding the illustrations) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source. 1 http://sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=24F7211B-1 Recovery Strategy for the Northern Bobwhite 2017 Preface The federal, provincial, and territorial government signatories under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk (1996)2 agreed to establish complementary legislation and programs that provide for effective protection of species at risk throughout Canada. Under the Species at Risk Act (S.C. 2002, c.29) (SARA), the federal competent ministers are responsible for the preparation of recovery strategies for listed Extirpated, Endangered, and Threatened species and are required to report on progress within five years after the publication of the final document on the SAR Public Registry. -
252 Bird Species
Appendix 5: Fauna Known to Occur on Fort Drum LIST OF FAUNA KNOWN TO OCCUR ON FORT DRUM as of January 2017. Federally listed species are noted with FT (Federal Threatened) and FE (Federal Endangered); state listed species are noted with SSC (Species of Special Concern), ST (State Threatened, and SE (State Endangered); introduced species are noted with I (Introduced). BIRD SPECIES (Taxonomy based on The American Ornithologists’ Union’s 7th Edition Checklist of North American birds.) ORDER ANSERIFORMES ORDER CUCULIFORMES FAMILY ANATIDAE - Ducks & Geese FAMILY CUCULIDAE - Cuckoos Anser albifrons Greater White-fronted Goose Coccyzus americanus Yellow-billed Cuckoo Chen caerulescens Snow Goose Coccyzus erthropthalmusBlack-billed Cuckoo Chen rossii Ross’s Goose Branta bernicla Brant Branta hutchinsii Cackling Goose ORDER CAPRIMULGIFORMES Branta canadensis Canada Goose FAMILY CARPIMULGIDAE - Nightjars Cygnus columbianus Tundra Swan Chordeiles minor Common Nighthawk (SSC) Aix sponsa Wood Duck Antrostomus carolinensis Eastern Whip-poor-will Anas strepera Gadwall (SSC) Anas americana American Wigeon Anas rubripes American Black Duck ORDER APODIFORMES Anas platyrhynchos Mallard FAMILY APODIDAE – Swifts Anas discors Blue-winged Teal Chaetura pelagica Chimney Swift Anas clypeata Northern Shoveler Anas acuta Northern Pintail FAMILY TROCHILIDAE – Hummingbirds Anas crecca Green-winged Teal Archilochus colubris Ruby-throated Hummingbird Aythya valisineria Canvasback Aythya americana Redhead ORDER GRUIFORMES Aythya collaris Ring-necked Duck FAMILY RALLIDAE -
<I>Colinus Virginianus</I>
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers in Natural Resources Natural Resources, School of 2012 Patterns of Incubation Behavior in Northern Bobwhites (Colinus virginianus) Jonathan S. Burnam University of Georgia, [email protected] Gretchen Turner University of Georgia, [email protected] Susan Ellis-Felege University of North Dakota, [email protected] William E. Palmer Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, Florida, [email protected] D. Clay Sisson Albany Quail Project & Dixie Plantation Research, Albany, GA, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natrespapers Part of the Behavior and Ethology Commons, and the Ornithology Commons Burnam, Jonathan S.; Turner, Gretchen; Ellis-Felege, Susan; Palmer, William E.; Sisson, D. Clay; and Carroll, John P., "Patterns of Incubation Behavior in Northern Bobwhites (Colinus virginianus)" (2012). Papers in Natural Resources. 487. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natrespapers/487 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural Resources, School of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in Natural Resources by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Jonathan S. Burnam, Gretchen Turner, Susan Ellis-Felege, William E. Palmer, D. Clay Sisson, and John P. Carroll This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natrespapers/487 CHAPTER SEVEN Patterns of Incubation Behavior in Northern Bobwhites Jonathan S. Burnam, Gretchen Turner, Susan N. Ellis-Felege, William E. Palmer, D. Clay Sisson, and John P. Carroll Abstract. Patterns of incubation and nesting parents took 0 – 3 recesses per day. -
Alectoris Chukar
PEST RISK ASSESSMENT Chukar partridge Alectoris chukar (Photo: courtesy of Olaf Oliviero Riemer. Image from Wikimedia Commons under a Creative Commons Attribution License, Version 3.) March 2011 This publication should be cited as: Latitude 42 (2011) Pest Risk Assessment: Chukar partridge (Alectoris chukar). Latitude 42 Environmental Consultants Pty Ltd. Hobart, Tasmania. About this Pest Risk Assessment This pest risk assessment is developed in accordance with the Policy and Procedures for the Import, Movement and Keeping of Vertebrate Wildlife in Tasmania (DPIPWE 2011). The policy and procedures set out conditions and restrictions for the importation of controlled animals pursuant to s32 of the Nature Conservation Act 2002. For more information about this Pest Risk Assessment, please contact: Wildlife Management Branch Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Address: GPO Box 44, Hobart, TAS. 7001, Australia. Phone: 1300 386 550 Email: [email protected] Visit: www.dpipwe.tas.gov.au Disclaimer The information provided in this Pest Risk Assessment is provided in good faith. The Crown, its officers, employees and agents do not accept liability however arising, including liability for negligence, for any loss resulting from the use of or reliance upon the information in this Pest Risk Assessment and/or reliance on its availability at any time. Pest Risk Assessment: Chukar partridge Alectoris chukar 2/20 1. Summary The chukar partridge (Alectoris chukar) is native to the mountainous regions of Asia, Western Europe and the Middle East (Robinson 2007, Wikipedia 2009). Its natural range includes Turkey, the Mediterranean islands, Iran and east through Russia and China and south into Pakistan and Nepal (Cowell 2008). -
Scientists Nail Quail Mystery 23 October 2009
Scientists nail quail mystery 23 October 2009 found quail on Tiritiri Matangi to be genetically identical to the Australian brown quail. As a result of the study, some museums around the world will have to rename their exhibits of quail, with Coturnix pectoralis (Australian stubble quail) previously labelled as Coturnix novaezelandiae. The New Zealand quail was once widespread throughout the country but declined rapidly in the mid-1800s as a result of large-scale deforestation and predation by dogs, cats and rats, and was declared extinct by 1875. The Australian brown quail was introduced as a game bird to replace it. Specimen of an extinct New Zealand quail in the Paris As well as clearing up an enduring mystery over the Museum of Natural History. identity of quails on the island, Mr Seabrook- Davison's research findings open up another debate on the role of introduced species in New Zealand. (PhysOrg.com) -- A Massey biology researcher has used DNA analysis to prove quail on Tiritiri Unlike the 70 million Australian possums that Matangi Island are Australian and not remnants of devastate native forests, and harm bird and insect an extinct New Zealand species. species, the quail could prove beneficial to our forests as an "ecological engineer" by tilling leaf PhD researcher Mark Seabrook-Davison from the litter and distributing seeds, he says. Institute of Natural Sciences at Albany says the introduced bird could enhance our forests if "The main reasons are that it is similar to the extinct allowed to thrive in other regions. New Zealand quail and appears to benefit an ecosystem and has no detrimental impact on Mr Seabrook-Davison, who has just completed his threatened native species. -
Coturnix Ypsilophora Brown Quail
BIRD Coturnix ypsilophora Brown Quail AUS SA AMLR Endemism Residency throughout the region from One Tree Hill in the north to Port Elliot in the south and from Onkaparinga in the - V V - Nomadic west to Callington in the east.3 Pre-1983 AMLR filtered records indicate few occurrences; most in the Adelaide metropolitan area and one in the Willunga area.3 In the MLR it was once ‘often seen’ but now occurs irregularly. The movement of the species into SA is poorly understood, but influxes from outside SA occur irregularly, with populations persisting for several years at favoured sites (G. Carpenter pers. comm.). Habitat Cryptic species that occurs in dense crops (especially oats), irrigated pastures, rank grasslands and sedgelands, especially where native species predominate, and often bordering swamps (G. Photo: © Brian Furby Carpenter pers. comm.). Conservation Significance The AMLR distribution is part of a limited extant Prefers dense grasslands, often on the edges of open 1 distribution in adjacent regions within SA. The species forests and bracken. has been described as 'probably declining' within the AMLR.2 Within the AMLR the species’ relative area of Within the AMLR the preferred broad vegetation occupancy is classified as ‘Extremely Restricted’. groups are Grassland, Grassy Woodland and 3 Relative to all AMLR extant species, the species' Wetland. taxonomic uniqueness is classified as ‘High’.3 Biology and Ecology Description Feeds in the early morning or evening, on the ground, Small, plump ground-dwelling bird, variable in colour, mainly on seeds and green shoots, but also on insects. 1 ranging from red brown to grey brown with fine white In some areas, quails will feed along roadsides. -
Females of Rhe Australian Orrue Euail,, Phasianidae (Euail with Hind
The Australiqn Bird Bander December,1967 Females orrue of rhe Australian euail,, Phasianidae(euail with hind toel). by H' 1. de s. Disney and Drawings by SondraBeresford, Austrarian Museum, sydney. !:: ::r :: : n! ailI : :::::::::!:!tl:ti i I' l: " 'li FEMALE STUBBLE QUAIL FEIUALE BROWN QUAIL FEMALE KING QUAIL STUBBLE QUAIL BROWN QUAIL 86 l The Australian Bird Bander December,1967 STUBBLE (Coturnix QUAIL per:roralis) Mantle and Back: White centre shafts 'square' to feathers with large black spots and narrower Female pale rufous bars. Length:7-7* inches(180-185 mm). Throat and Chin: Whitish buff. Primarics: Outer two equal in length and the next Rest of Underparts: Buff with dark brown bars almost the same tength (this applies with the each side ol' narrow white shaft. male also). Leg colour: Fleshy white. KING QUAIL (Excallactoria chinensis) Bitl (cutmen):Usually 12 mm (range 10-13; 20 measured). FemaIe Wing (flattened):Usual range 99-105 mm. Length: 4*-5 inches (108-127 mm). Line over eye: Well marked white stripe extend_ Primaries: The outer primaries vary in length ing to sides of neck. sometimesbeing similar to the StirUbleeJait and at other trmes similar to the Brown euail. Mantle and Back Large creamy buff spear_ This maybe a question of age. shapedcentres to feathers. Leg colour: Bright yellow. Throaf and Chin: Whitish, sometimeswith slieht spotting. BilI^(culmen):Usually 9-10 mm (range 9_l I mnr; l2 measured). Rest of Underparts Whitish buff streaked with Wing (flattened): dark brown. Usual range 65_74 mm. ^The p_luntagepattern of..the u_pp-erand under parls of the ^femaleRing euail is .iiriiir.-i" t-lrai ot tt" Brown Quail.