Project Detail

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Project Detail PROJECT DETAIL DEA Reference No. : 14/12/16/3/3/2/835 Project Title : Proposed Grootpoort Photovoltaic Solar Energy Facility near Luckhoff, Free State Province Authors : Mrs. Carli Otte Ms. Marelie Griesel Client : Pele Green Energy (Pty) Ltd. Report Status : Amended Draft Environmental Impact Report Submission date : 25 April 2016 When used as a reference this report should be cited as: Environamics (2016) Draft EIR Report: Proposed Grootpoort Photovoltaic Solar facility and associated infrastructure near Luckhoff, Free State Province. COPYRIGHT RESERVED This technical report has been produced for Pele Green Energy (Pty) Ltd. The intellectual property contained in this report remains vested in Environamics and Pele Green Energy (Pty) Ltd. No part of the report may be reproduced in any manner without written permission from Environamics or Pele Green Energy (Pty) Ltd. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT DETAIL .......................................................................................................................... 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................................... 2 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................ 5 LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................................... 6 PLATES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 APPENDICES .................................................................................................................................. 7 GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ACRONYMS .................................................................................... 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... 10 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 13 1.1 LEGAL MANDATE AND PURPOSE OF THE REPORT ................................................... 13 1.2 DETAILS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PRACTITIONER (EAP) .............. 16 1.3 DETAILS OF SPECIALISTS .............................................................................................. 16 Table 1.2: Details of specialists ................................................................................................. 16 1.4 STATUS OF THE EIA PROCESS ..................................................................................... 17 1.5 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT ...................................................................................... 18 2 ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION................................................................................................. 23 2.1 THE LOCATION OF THE ACTIVITY AND PROPERTY DESCRIPTION .......................... 23 2.2 ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION................................................................................................. 24 2.3 PHOTOVOLTAIC TECHNOLOGY .................................................................................... 26 2.4 LAYOUT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................. 27 2.5 SERVICES PROVISION ................................................................................................... 28 3 LEGISLATIVE AND POLICY CONTEXT........................................................................... 30 2 3.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 30 3.2 LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT ................................................................................................. 32 3.3 POLICY CONTEXT ........................................................................................................... 37 3.4 OTHER LEGISLATION ..................................................................................................... 43 3.5 RELEVANT GUIDANCE ................................................................................................... 43 3.6 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................. 43 4 THE NEED AND DESIRABILITY ...................................................................................... 45 4.1 THE NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY ................................................................. 45 4.2 THE DESIRABILITY OF THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY ..................................................... 45 5 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES .............................................................. 48 5.1 CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES........................................................................... 48 5.1.1 No-go alternative ............................................................................................................... 48 5.1.2 Location alternatives ......................................................................................................... 49 5.1.3 Activity alternatives ........................................................................................................... 50 5.1.4 Technical alternatives ....................................................................................................... 51 5.1.5 Design and layout alternatives .......................................................................................... 51 5.1.6 Technology alternatives .................................................................................................... 52 5.2 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS .............................................................................. 53 5.2.1 General ............................................................................................................................. 53 5.2.2 Consultation process ......................................................................................................... 57 5.2.3 Registered I&APs .............................................................................................................. 57 5.2.4 Issues raised by IAPs and consultation bodies ................................................................. 57 5.3 THE ENVIRONMENTAL ATTRIBUTES ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT FOOTPRINT ..................................................................................................................... 60 5.3.1 Biophysical environment ................................................................................................... 60 5.3.2 Description of the socio-economic environment ................................................................ 69 3 6 DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPACTS AND RISKS .............................................................. 72 6.1 SCOPING METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................ 73 6.1.1 Checklist analysis .............................................................................................................. 73 6.1.2 Matrix analysis .................................................................................................................. 75 6.2 KEY ISSUES IDENTIFIED ................................................................................................ 89 6.2.1 Impacts during the construction phase .............................................................................. 89 6.2.2 Impacts during the operational phase ............................................................................... 89 6.2.3 Impacts during the decommissioning phase ..................................................................... 90 6.3 ASPECTS TO BE ASSESSED ......................................................................................... 90 6.4 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS FROM SPECIALIST STUDIES .......................... 91 6.4.2 Issue 2: Heritage and archeological impacts ..................................................................... 92 6.4.3 Issue 3: Ecological Impacts ............................................................................................... 93 6.5 METHOD OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ........................................................... 96 6.5.1 Impact Rating System ....................................................................................................... 96 7 CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT ...................................................................... 102 7.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 102 7.2 Geographic Area of Evaluation ....................................................................................... 102 7.3 Temporal Boundary of Evaluation ................................................................................... 103 7.4 Other projects in the area ................................................................................................ 104 7.4.1 Existing projects in the area ............................................................................................ 104 7.4.2 Projects in the foreseeable future .................................................................................... 105 7.5 SPECIALIST INFORMATION
Recommended publications
  • A Survey of Race Relations in South Africa: 1953-1954
    A survey of race relations in South Africa: 1953-1954 http://www.aluka.org/action/showMetadata?doi=10.5555/AL.SFF.DOCUMENT.BOO19540000.042.000 Use of the Aluka digital library is subject to Aluka’s Terms and Conditions, available at http://www.aluka.org/page/about/termsConditions.jsp. By using Aluka, you agree that you have read and will abide by the Terms and Conditions. Among other things, the Terms and Conditions provide that the content in the Aluka digital library is only for personal, non-commercial use by authorized users of Aluka in connection with research, scholarship, and education. The content in the Aluka digital library is subject to copyright, with the exception of certain governmental works and very old materials that may be in the public domain under applicable law. Permission must be sought from Aluka and/or the applicable copyright holder in connection with any duplication or distribution of these materials where required by applicable law. Aluka is a not-for-profit initiative dedicated to creating and preserving a digital archive of materials about and from the developing world. For more information about Aluka, please see http://www.aluka.org A survey of race relations in South Africa: 1953-1954 Author/Creator Horrell, Muriel Publisher South African Institute of Race Relations, Johannesburg Date 1954 Resource type Reports Language English Subject Coverage (spatial) South Africa Coverage (temporal) 1953-1954 Source EG Malherbe Library Description Survey of race relations in South Africa in 1953 and 1954 and includes chapters on: Politics and attitudes; The plans and activities of non-European organizations and those working in collaboration with them; General work making for improved race relations; Events ouside the Union with bearing on South African affairs; General South African affairs; Matters affecting specific groups; Urban areas; Rural areas; Education; Employment; Health; Social welfare; Recreation; Justice; Legislative measures dealth with in 1953/1954.
    [Show full text]
  • Energize RE Supplement
    Creating a Cleaner, Brighter Future The 50 MW photovoltaic (PV) De Aar Solar PROJECT DESCRIPTION In November 2012 the project signed a 20 year Power project mobilised its construction teams Power Purchase Agreement with Eskom for the sale of electricity and an implementation agreement in December 2012 and is one of the first solar Located 6 km outside the town of De Aar on land with the Department of Energy for the project. facilities in the country to start construction owned by the Emthanjeni Municipality in the Mobilisation of the construction teams commenced as part of the South African Government’s Re- Northern Cape. The project will cover an estimat- in December 2012 and it is expected to be opera- newable Energy Independent Power Producers ed 100 hectares and will generate about 50 MW of tional in mid 2014. Programme (REIPPP). clean renewable power. Once constructed, the De When generating, the facility will supply enough Aar Solar Power facility will convert energy from clean, renewable electricity to power more than With demand for electricity continuing to grow in the sun into electricity using 167,580 PV panels 30,000 South African homes and eliminate over South Africa, the introduction of this clean energy that will be fed directly into the Eskom 132 KV dis- 82,040 tonnes of carbon emissions each year. will have far reaching benefits for the country’s tribution system. power sector, economy and people. TECHNICAL SUMMARY HOW IS ELECTRICITY PRODUCED Solar Panel Suntech STP 290/295, 24Vd 290/295 Watt FROM THE SUN? Photovoltaic (or solar cells) operate by means of two layers of PV Panel rated capacity 290 Watt and 295 Watt semiconductors, usually silicon.
    [Show full text]
  • Xhariep Magisterial District
    !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. XXhhaarriieepp MMaaggiisstteerriiaall DDiissttrriicctt !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. TheunissenS ubD istrict !. BARKLY WEST R59 R707 !. ST DEALESVILLE R708 SAPS WINBURG ST R70 !. R370 Lejwelepuitsa SAPS Dealesville R73 Winburg ST ST ST R31 Lejwelepuitsa ST Marquard !. ST LKN12 Boshof !. BRANDFORT Brandfort SAPS !. Soutpan R703 SAPS !. R64 STR64 Magiisteriiall R703 !. ST Sub District Marquard Senekal CAMPBELL ST Kimberley Dealesville ST Ficksburg !. !. !. !. R64 Sub BOSHOF SOUTPAN SAPS KIMBERLEY ST Sub !. !. !. SAPS Diistriict R64 SAPS Brandfort !. SAPS ST R709 Sub District District Sub !. !. Sub ST District Verkeerdevlei MARQUARD Sub District N1 !. SAPS Clocolan !. !. District STR700 KL District
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment
    Study Name: Orange River Integrated Water Resources Management Plan Report Title: Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment Submitted By: WRP Consulting Engineers, Jeffares and Green, Sechaba Consulting, WCE Pty Ltd, Water Surveys Botswana (Pty) Ltd Authors: A Jeleni, H Mare Date of Issue: November 2007 Distribution: Botswana: DWA: 2 copies (Katai, Setloboko) Lesotho: Commissioner of Water: 2 copies (Ramosoeu, Nthathakane) Namibia: MAWRD: 2 copies (Amakali) South Africa: DWAF: 2 copies (Pyke, van Niekerk) GTZ: 2 copies (Vogel, Mpho) Reports: Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment Review of Surface Hydrology in the Orange River Catchment Flood Management Evaluation of the Orange River Review of Groundwater Resources in the Orange River Catchment Environmental Considerations Pertaining to the Orange River Summary of Water Requirements from the Orange River Water Quality in the Orange River Demographic and Economic Activity in the four Orange Basin States Current Analytical Methods and Technical Capacity of the four Orange Basin States Institutional Structures in the four Orange Basin States Legislation and Legal Issues Surrounding the Orange River Catchment Summary Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 General ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Objective of the study ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa)
    FREE STATE PROFILE (South Africa) Lochner Marais University of the Free State Bloemfontein, SA OECD Roundtable on Higher Education in Regional and City Development, 16 September 2010 [email protected] 1 Map 4.7: Areas with development potential in the Free State, 2006 Mining SASOLBURG Location PARYS DENEYSVILLE ORANJEVILLE VREDEFORT VILLIERS FREE STATE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT VILJOENSKROON KOPPIES CORNELIA HEILBRON FRANKFORT BOTHAVILLE Legend VREDE Towns EDENVILLE TWEELING Limited Combined Potential KROONSTAD Int PETRUS STEYN MEMEL ALLANRIDGE REITZ Below Average Combined Potential HOOPSTAD WESSELSBRON WARDEN ODENDAALSRUS Agric LINDLEY STEYNSRUST Above Average Combined Potential WELKOM HENNENMAN ARLINGTON VENTERSBURG HERTZOGVILLE VIRGINIA High Combined Potential BETHLEHEM Local municipality BULTFONTEIN HARRISMITH THEUNISSEN PAUL ROUX KESTELL SENEKAL PovertyLimited Combined Potential WINBURG ROSENDAL CLARENS PHUTHADITJHABA BOSHOF Below Average Combined Potential FOURIESBURG DEALESVILLE BRANDFORT MARQUARD nodeAbove Average Combined Potential SOUTPAN VERKEERDEVLEI FICKSBURG High Combined Potential CLOCOLAN EXCELSIOR JACOBSDAL PETRUSBURG BLOEMFONTEIN THABA NCHU LADYBRAND LOCALITY PLAN TWEESPRUIT Economic BOTSHABELO THABA PATSHOA KOFFIEFONTEIN OPPERMANSDORP Power HOBHOUSE DEWETSDORP REDDERSBURG EDENBURG WEPENER LUCKHOFF FAURESMITH houses JAGERSFONTEIN VAN STADENSRUST TROMPSBURG SMITHFIELD DEPARTMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT & HOUSING PHILIPPOLIS SPRINGFONTEIN Arid SPATIAL PLANNING DIRECTORATE ZASTRON SPATIAL INFORMATION SERVICES ROUXVILLE BETHULIE
    [Show full text]
  • SA-SIG-Newsletter June 2005
    S. A. SIG http://www.jewishgen.org/SAfrica/ Editor: Bubbles Segall [email protected] Southern African Jewish Genealogy Special Interest Group Newsletter Vol. 6, Issue 4 June 2006 In this Issue President’s Message – Saul Issroff 2 Editorial – Bubbles Segall 3 Prince Alfred Shlepped Here – Adam Yamey 5 Books Glimpses of the Jews of Kenya: Nairobi Hebrew Congregationi 13 The Jewish Victorian: from the Jewish Newspapers 1871 – 1880 13 The Jewish Victorian: from the Jewish Newspapers 1861 – 1870 13 Mailships of the Union Castle Line 13 Jewish Projects – Bubbles Segall 15 Parow Golden Jubilee 16 South African Small Country Communities Project, Volume 4 17 Book of Memoirs: Reminiscences of South Africa Jewry – N. D. Hoffman 18 © 2006 SA-SIG. All articles are copyright and are not to be copied or reprinted without the permission of the author. The contents of the articles contain the opinions of the authors and do not reflect those of the Editor, or of the members of the SA-SIG Board. The Editor has the right to accept or reject any material submitted, or edit as might be appropriate. PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE The Southern Africa Jewish Genealogy Genealogy has advanced from simply collecting Special Interest Group (SA-SIG) individual names to the use of cutting edge technology to source connections. Most evident is The purpose and goal of the Southern Africa Special the use of search engines and the creation of Interest Group (SA-SIG) is to bring together Jewish massive user friendly databases. But it is in the field genealogy researchers with a common interest in Southern of genetics that the most stunning advances are Africa and to provide a forum for a free exchange of ideas, research tips and information of interest to those being made.
    [Show full text]
  • Faith in an Anglo-Boer War Concentration Camp of 1901
    Acta Academica 2007 39(3): 21-44 Dolf Britz ‘Now, what has become of our prayers and supplications?’ Faith in an Anglo-Boer War concentration camp of 1901 First submission: February 2007 Christian faith played a significant and decisive role in the concentration camps of the Anglo-Boer War (1899-1902). This article focuses on the diary of A D Luckhoff (1874-1963) who, after completing his theological training, volunteered for the ministry in the concentration camp at Bethulie. The anguish, distress and trials of this inex- perienced young clergyman are disclosed by allowing the diary to speak for itself, thus ensuring that its profound spiritual and emotional character is retained in the expo- sition. Alongside this exposition, observations and historical notes are appended, as well as questions concerning the diarist’s underlying theological convictions, which are compared and contrasted with those evinced in the contemporary diary of a young female resident of the camp, Rensche van der Walt (1878-1948). The ensuing analysis aims to demonstrate that Christian faith was a more complicated and complex issue during this war than has yet been realised. ‘Ag, wat het van ons gebede en versugtinge geword?’ Geloof in ’n konsentrasiekamp gedurende die Anglo- Boereoorlog 1901 Gedurende die Anglo-Boereoorlog (1899-1902) het die Christelike geloof ’n bepalende en belangrike rol gespeel in die konsentrasiekampe. Hierdie artikel gaan in op die dagboek van ’n jong aspirant predikant, A D Luckhoff (1874-1963). Hy het hom na voltooiing van sy teologiese opleiding beskikbaar gestel vir die bediening in die kon- sentrasiekamp van Bethulie. Sy dagboek word geanaliseer met die oog daarop om die spiritualiteit, onderliggende teologiese oortuigings, refleksie én aanvegting, bloot te lê.
    [Show full text]
  • Letsemeng Local Municipality – Final Draft IDP 2010/2011
    Letsemeng Local Municipality Final: Integrated Development Plan (IDP) 2010/2011 1 Letsemeng Local Municipality –IDP Contents Page No Item Page No Section A – Executive Summary 1.1 Who are We 3 1.2 What are the issues we face 4 1.3 What opportunities do we offer 4 1.4 What are we doing to improve ourselves 5 – 6 1.5 What could you expect from us over the next 5 years 6 – 7 1.6 How will our progress be measured 7 – 8 1.7 How was this plan developed 8 – 10 1.8 IDP Process Plan 11 Section B – Situational Analysis 2.1 Introduction and Overview of the Municipality 12 2.2 Demographic Overview 12 – 13 2.3 Socio Economic Profile 13 – 14 2.4 Infrastructure and Housing 14 – 15 2.5 Population and distribution per town 15 – 16 2.6 Institutional Profile 16 – 23 Section C - Vision 24 Section D – Mission 24 Section E – Strategic Objectives 25 – 28 Section F – Development Strategies 29 – 57 Section F1 – Spatial Perspective 58 – 59 Section F2 – Basic Service Delivery 60 – 62 Section F3 – Local Economic Development 63 – 64 Section F4 – Municipal Transformation and Organisational 65 Development Section F5 – Municipal Financial Viability and Management 66 – 68 Section F6 – Good Governance 69 – 72 Section G – Projects 73 – 77 Supporting and Sector Plans 78 2 1. Executive Summary: 1.1 Who are We? Letsemeng Local Municipality is situated in the South Western Free State and forms part of the Xhariep District, a rather geographical rich area with limited natural economical resources. The local municipality area measures 10180.71km2 in extend and compromises the former TLCs of Koffiefontein, Petrusburg, Jacobsdal, Oppermansgronde and Luckhoff as well as a part of the former South west and Central South TRCs.
    [Show full text]
  • 20201101-Fs-Advert Xhariep Sheriff Service Area.Pdf
    XXhhaarriieepp SShheerriiffff SSeerrvviiccee AArreeaa UITKYK GRASRANDT KLEIN KAREE PAN VAAL PAN BULTFONTEIN OLIFANTSRUG SOLHEIM WELVERDIEND EDEN KADES PLATKOP ZWAAIHOEK MIDDEL BULT Soutpan AH VLAKPAN MOOIVLEI LOUISTHAL GELUKKIG DANIELSRUST DELFT MARTHINUSPAN HERMANUS THE CRISIS BELLEVUE GOEWERNEURSKOP ROOIPAN De Beers Mine EDEN FOURIESMEER DE HOOP SHEILA KLEINFONTEIN MEGETZANE FLORA MILAMBI WELTEVREDE DE RUST KENSINGTON MARA LANGKUIL ROSMEAD KALKFONTEIN OOST FONTAINE BLEAU MARTINA DORASDEEL BERDINA PANORAMA YVONNE THE MONASTERY JOHN'S LOCKS VERDRIET SPIJT FONTEIN Kimberley SP ROOIFONTEIN OLIFANTSDAM HELPMEKAAR MIMOSA DEALESRUST WOLFPAN ZWARTLAAGTE MORNING STAR PLOOYSBURG BRAKDAM VAALPAN INHOEK CHOE RIETPAN Soetdoring R30 MARIA ATHELOON WATERVAL RUSOORD R709 LOUISLOOTE LAURA DE BAD STOFPUT OPSTAL HERMITAGE WOLVENFONTEIN SUNNYSIDE EERLIJK DORISVILLE ST ZUUR FONTEIN Verkeerdevlei ST LYONSREST R708 UITVAL SANCTUARY SUSANNA BOTHASDAM MERIBA AURORA KALKWAL ^!. VERKEERDEVLEI WATERVAL ZETLAND BELMONT ST SAPS SPITS KOP DIDIMALA LEMOENHOEK WATERVAL ORANGIA SCHOONVLAKTE DWAALHOEK WELTEVREDE GERTJE PAARDEBERG KOPPIES' N8 SANDDAM ZAMENKOMST R64 Nature DIEPHOEK FARMS KARREE KLIMOP MELKVLEY OMDRAAI Mantsopa NU ELYSIUM UMPUKANE HORATIO EUREKA ROODE PAN LK KAMEELPAN KOEDOE`S RAND KLIPFONTEIN DUIKERSDRAAI VLAKLAAGTE ST MIMOSA FAIRFIELD VALAF BEGINSEL Verkeerdevlei SP KOPPIESDAM MELIEFE ZAAIPLAATS PAARDEBERG KARREE DAM ARBEIDSGENOT DOORNLAAGTE EUREKA GELYK TAFELKOP KAREEKOP BOESMANSKOP AHLEN BLAUWKRANS VAN LOVEDALE ALETTA ROODE ESKOL "A" Tokologo NU AANKOMST
    [Show full text]
  • Arid Areas Report, Volume 1: District SocioEconomic Profile 2007 — NO 1 and Development Plans
    Arid Areas Report, Volume 1: District socio-economic profile 2007 NO 1 and development plans Arid Areas Report, Volume 1: District socio-economic profile and development plans Centre for Development Support (IB 100) University of the Free State PO Box 339 Bloemfontein 9300 South Africa www.ufs.ac.za/cds Please reference as: Centre for Development Support (CDS). 2007. Arid Areas Report, Volume 1: District socio-economic profile and development plans. CDS Research Report, Arid Areas, 2007(1). Bloemfontein: University of the Free State (UFS). CONTENTS I. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 II. Geographic overview ........................................................................................................ 2 1. Namaqualand and Richtersveld ................................................................................................... 3 2. The Karoo................................................................................................................................... 4 3. Gordonia, the Kalahari and Bushmanland .................................................................................... 4 4. General characteristics of the arid areas ....................................................................................... 5 III. The Western Zone (Succulent Karoo) .............................................................................. 8 1. Namakwa District Municipality ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • App4 1Intertaffecttpartytdb.Pdf
    Co/Org Title First Names Surname Position Address City Postcode Category Name Mnr Kobie Ackerman Posbus 30 Vanderkloof 8771 Landowners Mev Emma Adams Wapadsdam Oppermans 9987 Landowners Mnr Charles Adams Posbus 158 Oppermans 9987 Landowners Mnr Albert C Adams Adamsrus Oppermans 9987 Landowners Mnr T G Alant Posbus 100-400 Haddison Park 8306 Landowners Mnr D J J Albertyn Posbus 217 De Aar 7000 Landowners Mnr/Mev P J Alexander Poortjiesdam Oppermans 9987 Landowners Mnr/Mev A J Alexander Avondrus Oppermans 9987 Landowners Mnr/Mev S Amsterdam Wilhelmina Str 172 Oppermans 9987 Landowners Mnr Willie (F W) Anderson Posbus 55 Dealesville 9348 Landowners Mnr/Mev W Arends Houmoed Ln 104 Oppermans 9987 Landowners Mnr/Mev B Arends Houmoed Ln 190 Oppermans 9987 Landowners Mnr Barnus (J U) Badenhorst Posbus 89 Dealesville 9348 Landowners Mnr Daniel Barend Rudolph Badenhorst (De Kiel Trust) Posbus 155 Koffiefontein 9986 Landowners Mnr J A C Badenhorst vir Mnr J F Cillie Posbus 48 Jacobsdal 8710 Landowners Mnr Louis (J L) Badenhorst Posbus 89 Dealesville 9348 Landowners Mr Titus Baloyi Specialist P O Box 1589 Sunninghill 2157 Independent Specialists Mnr Koos Barkhuizen Posbus 86 Luckhoff 9982 Landowners Mnr Andrew Barnes Posbus 319 Oppermans 9987 Landowners Mr/Mrs E D Barnes Joelene Oppermans 9987 Landowners Mnr T J N Basson Posbus 53 Koffiefontein 9986 Landowners Mnr Fritz Conrad Battenhaussen Posbus 67 Phillipstown 8795 Landowners Mr/Mrs E Begly 31 Hull St Kimberley 8300 Landowners Mnr Johannes Jurgens Bekker Posbus 147 Dealesville 9348 Landowners Mnr
    [Show full text]
  • SUSTAINABLE MINING P44 World’S Largest Hydrogen Truck on Track
    ATR Feb 2021 Cover_Layout 1 28/01/2021 12:22 Page 1 www.africanreview.com Europe €10, Ghana C1.8, Kenya Ksh200, Nigeria N330, South Africa R25, UK £7, USA $12 FINANCE POWER CONSTRUCTION MINING Increased investments in Zambia Desalination plants and pump Roll-out of Volvo’s 10-tonne Hybrid power solutions needed for SDGs by 2030 P18 units powered by PV systems P24 asphalt compactors P30 changing the industry P38 FEBRUARY 2021 African Review of Business and Technology African Review SUSTAINABLE MINING P44 World’s largest hydrogen truck on track February 2021 February AFCFTA P19 Opportunity or curse for Africa? Volume 57 Number 01 Volume P16 www.africanreview.com “The continent only needs to cultivate a cluster of real catalytic investors to YEARS mount a resilient mining investment 58 Covid-19 response.” SERVING BUSINESS IN Hubert Danso, CEO of Africa investor (Ai) AFRICA SINCE 1964 S01 ATR Feb 2021 Start_ATR - New Master Template 2016 25/01/2021 15:50 Page 2 S01 ATR Feb 2021 Start_ATR - New Master Template 2016 28/01/2021 12:34 Page 3 Editor’s Note elcome to our February issue of African Review. In our cover story, we caught up with Anglo WAmerican and its plans on developing the world’s largest hydrogen mining haul truck as part of efforts to reduce the company’s carbon footprint, (page 44). Our economist, Moin Siddiqi, provides a comprehensive overview of the African Continental Free Trade Area, (AfCFTA) agreement, which came into being last month, and its implications in transforming Africa’s intra-regional trade capabilities.
    [Show full text]