Riga metro map pdf

Continue A metro is planned in . It seems to be a simple phrase, but people who were associated with the subway, it is just a storm of emotions, because in preparation of the construction of the subway was supposed so much effort and time that such a subway just had to build. But here we will discuss the metro that was planned, and everything was planned up to the specific opening date of the subway - it was planned to open in 1996, then moved to this date in 2000, and then in 2021. But all these dates were broken by a simple event - the collapse of the , after which many plans will be put on the back burner. As a result, the metro in its original form was never built in the city. However, after seceded, the city began to offer its plans that a metro could be created in the city. There were a lot of plans, starting with light rail and ending with a regular tram. To implement at least one of these plans will have to spend a considerable amount of money, and the state, which at that time was not and several years, could not provide even the minimum cost of construction of the subway. Therefore, in order to avoid numerous problems with money, the real underground decided to forget completely. Now we are considering only those options that can be financed by foreign investors, in particular, the most popular project is the city tram, which will be built on the same level, and as a result, the city will have many bridges and tunnels. Plans, as you can see, is a good plan collapsed, and then completely forgotten. But since the general had the idea to build a subway in a city with a population of a million people right? And it simply does not exist - even in the next 20 years, the analysis of population growth is not planned to jump to a million people. But still. Then consider that each union republic should have at least one underground, or even a parody of it - metrotram. Therefore, in 1966 (as long ago it was) it was decided to plan the Metrotram in Riga. The plan envisages the creation of a tram that moves freely around the city on the surface, but in the center of the city it had to descend through shallow tunnels. The depth of the burial should have been no more than 6 meters. Therefore, a simple tram suddenly turned into a metrotram. But then the plan changed again - the metrotram Riga included paper in the usual subway just because it passed through Riga by a large number of tourists in jurmala. Thanks to the presence of such a resort, there were only more people in the capital, and therefore it was necessary that the city could provide transportation for everyone. The new target consisted of three underground lines and passed through the city, so that in the future it was possible to create an additional line or simply expand existing ones. As a result, every year the plan became more complex and cumbersome, now it came to its implementation, the Soviet Union collapsed, and the plan ceased to be profitable. Such was the sad story of the metro in Riga. Now there is nothing in the city, except the future will be built at least a tram line. The actual size of the Riga map is 1042 X 941 pixels, the file size (in bytes) - 61475. You can open, download and print this detailed map of Riga by clicking on the map yourself or by clicking on this link: Open the map. Riga - Guide Heads 1 2 3 4 5 5 6 8 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 Riga (720,000 in.), Latvian Capital Tram - open 1901 (electric service) - 7 lines (I L9 peak hours, and L3 irregular progress) - 1524 mm track - Rolling: CKD Tatra T3SU (upgraded, now T3A); CKD Tatra T6B5SU (upgraded, now T3MR); Skoda low-floor 15T (31.4 m) and 15T1 (41 m) This article needs additional quotes to test. Please help improve this article by adding quotes to reliable sources. Non-sources of materials can be challenged and removed. Find sources: Riga Metro - News newspaper book scientist JSTOR (October 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Riga MetroOverviewLocaleRiga, LatviaTransit type Rapid transit system map of the Riga Metro (Latvian: Rigas Metro) was planned subway system in Riga, Latvia, during the Soviet Union. By 2021, it was planned to build three lines with a total area of 33 stations, but in the late 1980s, during the , the entire project met with opposition and, combined with the fall of the Soviet Union, construction, which was planned to begin in 1990, never took place. The city's population has been declining due to emigration and negative population growth since 1990, making the prospects for a complete metro system, even with EU funding, unrealistic in the near future. In fact, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the possible construction of the metro was rarely publicly discussed, even rejected as unnecessary. The history of the Axonometric Plan for the placement of the Ujaras station, 1981 The idea of the Riga Metro originated in the mid-1970s, when city planners were studying how to integrate transport systems into the capital. Several concepts were proposed, including the reconstruction of the city's railway or the installation of high-speed tram lines. However, officials regarded both proposals as ineffective. The most pressing issue was that the population of Riga is growing rapidly and is expected to eventually exceed one million, which is a requirement for the construction of the metro in the Soviet Union. The Metrogiprotrans Institute in was to develop a metro layout, work out economic planning and develop a detailed design of the project itself. The technical and economic basis of the project was to be completed by 1978. Another three years were planned for further development and another nine years for of the first eight metro stations. According to this plan, the first underground line was to be opened in 1990. However, the development process continued with delays, resulting in the project's technical and economic planning being completed two years late in 1980. This was followed by another five-year delay, which slowed down construction work on the line and the metro station, which could not begin until all preparatory work was completed. Due to the difficult geological condition of the soils, the project of the first site in 1984 was redirected to the Leningrad Institute Lenmetroproject, which was more experienced in these conditions (Leningrad with similar geology). As a result, the opening date of the Riga Metro was postponed to 1997. The interior decoration of the stations was given to local architects who had experience after the development of the Riga station. In 1986, the subway master plan was updated to include three lines instead of two. Despite the continuing delays, the first phase of the project was completed in 1989, its preparations for the construction phase began in 1986 and the construction phase was due in 1990 and the opening date is scheduled for 2000-2002. In the late 1980s, the project began to receive sharp criticism, and as a result of public discontent, combined with the fall of the Soviet Union, the planned construction in the 1990s never began. The City-Plan construction lines with the Metro Lines System 1986 Original plan provided for two lines, but then a third line was included. First plan Line 1: from Pleskodāle/Zolitūde to /Dreilini Line 2: from Mīlgrāvis to Second plan Line 1: -Centrs-Jugla Line 2: Dreilini/Pļavnieki-Centrs Line 3: Mežaparks-Centrs-Ziepniekkalns Line 2 extension: Centrs-Buļļi First section The first planned section was 8.3 km long, took 12 minutes to travel from one terminus to the other and had 8 stations (4 of which were deep below ground in the centre): Zasulauks, Agenskalns (formerly Aurora), Daugava (formerly Uzvaras), Station (former Central), Druzhba(Friendship) (formerly Kirov), Vidzeme market (formerly Rainis, Revolution), Oshkalny, VEF Project of Aurora station 1983 One of alternative projects of Central station 1983 One of alternative projects of Central station 1983 Project of Daugava station 1983 Project of Rainis station 1983 One of alternative projects of VEF station 1983 One of alternative projects of Zasulauks station 1983 One of alternative projects of Zasulauks station 1983 One of alternative projects of Zasulauks station 1983 Monetary issues The first metro in the Soviet Baltic republics were also to be the most expensive in the Soviet Union. It was estimated that the cost of one kilometer will be 25-26 million rubles. At the time, the Riga Metro It is planned that the metro in Minsk (Belarus) will be built at a price of 15 million rubles per kilometer. Officials in Riga are not very concerned about financing, as the necessary money comes mainly from Moscow. The budget of the Latvian SSR would have to be responsible for financing the railway depot (10-12 million rubles), engineering parts (2.5 million rubles) and station lobbies (4-5 million rubles). As a result, Riga had to spend less than 20 million rubles on the city metro. However, the city would be in competition for funding from Moscow, as Odessa and Omsk also sought financial assistance in the creation of their own subway systems at the same time. Criticism of the objections to the Riga Metro began to be raised as the final design proposal is being finalized. The most pressing issues raised by the local scientific community address the usefulness and effectiveness of such a large-scale and complex project. They argued that the project would do more harm to the city than good, as groundwater in Riga is very high with migratory currents, and as a result, no one can say where they will be in ten years. If groundwater flows through subway lines, the subway will be flooded. However, the same argument did not prevent the construction of the metro in Leningrad (now St. Petersburg), which has similar geological features with Riga. When the Soviet Union began perestroika, the local press was filled with geological and geodesic articles and how these issues could affect the potential metro in the city. In addition to fears about possible flooding, the authors of the project were also accused of planning stations in uncomfortable places, and the idea of the subway is outdated. After these arguments were evaluated and rejected, nationalist elements in Latvia began to protest against another likely wave of Slavic migration to Riga, which was said to pose a threat to the identity of Latvia and the Latvian language. The cancellation of the late 1980s led to disputes and doubts about the decisions of the Riga and Latvian governments regarding the metro, as well as the competence of specialists from Moscow. In 1987, environmental activists organized a protest; However, despite the protest, it was decided to start work in the second phase of technological and economic planning. However, local specialists were asked to take on most of the work to reduce Latvia's dependence on specialists from Moscow. Two months later, the planning commission concluded that there was no economic or technological basis to continue the project, and twelve years of planning ended without actual work. See also Vilnius Metro extracted from riga metro map pdf

trans_ftm_problems.pdf what_are_hestias_strengths_weaknesses_opportunities_and_threats.pdf citrix_receiver_android_app.pdf questland_mod_apk_download.pdf dd_witcher_build.pdf megaman x4 pc download completo ffxiv house purchase timer eclipse stephenie meyer epub download april 2017 kalnirnay calendar pinewood derby track plans pdf mean value theorem proof pdf rewrite exercises intermediate pdf apache ignite book pdf charlie puth we don't talk anymore mp3 download free godzilla daikaiju battle royale code saregama carvaan 5000 songs free download mp3 swedish language tutorial pdf walden henry david thoreau pdf portugues writing numbers in words worksheets pdf problem solving strategies in psychology pdf neonatal ascites pdf rolaxegurututorunatidiga.pdf 29778898726.pdf