DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment for Travel Management Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Assessment for Travel Management Project Environmental Assessment For Travel Management Project Responsible Agency: US Forest Service, Ouachita National Forest Responsible Official: Norman L. Wagoner, Forest Supervisor PO Box 1270 Hot Springs, AR 71902 For Further Information Contact: Lisa Cline, Forest NEPA Coordinator 501-321-5202 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 ...................................................................................................................... 1 PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION ................................... 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 Proposed Action ................................................................................................................ 1 Purpose of and Need for the Action ................................................................................ 6 Scope of This Environmental Analysis ........................................................................... 8 History of the Planning and Scoping Process ................................................................. 8 Significant Issues ............................................................................................................ 9 Non-significant Issues Eliminated From Further Study ................................................. 9 Effects Disclosed .......................................................................................................... 11 Decisions to Be Made ...................................................................................................... 11 CHAPTER 2 .................................................................................................................... 12 ALTERNATIVES INCLUDING THE PROPOSED ACTION ................................. 12 Alternative Design ........................................................................................................... 12 Technical Requirements................................................................................................ 12 Monitoring .................................................................................................................... 14 Alternatives Considered But Eliminated from Detailed Study .................................. 15 Alternatives Documented in Detail................................................................................ 15 Amendment to the Revised Forest Plan ........................................................................ 22 Other Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions ............................ 23 Summary Comparison All Alternatives........................................................................ 24 CHAPTER 3 .................................................................................................................... 29 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES .... 29 Recreation ........................................................................................................................ 29 Local Economy ................................................................................................................ 33 i Public Health and Safety ................................................................................................ 36 Transportation System ................................................................................................... 37 Heritage Program/Cultural Resources ......................................................................... 40 Soils................................................................................................................................... 42 Spread of Non-native Invasive Species ......................................................................... 47 Water Resources & Quality, Municipal Watersheds, Riparian Areas ...................... 48 Proposed, Endangered, Threatened, & Sensitive (PETS) Species ............................. 69 Habitat and Management Indicator Species (MIS) ................................................... 235 CHAPTER 4 .................................................................................................................. 268 PERSONS AND AGENCIES CONSULTED ............................................................. 268 CHAPTER 5 .................................................................................................................. 269 LITERATURE CITED ................................................................................................ 269 APPENDICES ............................................................................................................... 274 ii LISTING OF FIGURES & TABLES Figure 1. Ouachita National Forest vicinity map. ......................................................... 2 Proposed Action - Designated Road Use (Table 1.1) ..................................................... 3 Proposed Action - Designated Trail Use (Table 1.2) ...................................................... 3 Proposed Action - Open Roads to be Closed (Table 1.3) .............................................. 4 Proposed Action - Changes to the Current Transportation System (Table 1.4)......... 4 Proposed Action - Game Retrieval (Table 1.5) .............................................................. 5 Proposed Action - Camping Access (Table 1.6) ............................................................. 5 Figure 2. Damaged seep located adjacent to FS Road 31 and a dispersed campsite. 7 Priority Subwatersheds (Table 2.1) ............................................................................... 13 Wolf Pen Gap Subwatersheds (Table 2.2) .................................................................... 13 Arkansas Fatmucket Subwatersheds (Table 2.3) ......................................................... 14 Alternative A - Designated Road Use (Table 2.4) ........................................................ 16 Alternative A - Designated Trail Use (Table 2.5) ......................................................... 16 Alternative A - Game Retrieval (Table 2.6) ................................................................. 16 Alternative D - Designated Road Use (Table 2.7) ........................................................ 17 Alternative D - Designated Trail Use (Table 2.8) ......................................................... 17 Alternative D - Open Roads to be Closed (Table 2.9) .................................................. 17 Alternative D - Game Retrieval (Table 2.10) ............................................................... 17 Alternative E - Designated Road Use (Table 2.11) ...................................................... 18 Alternative E - Designated Trail Use (Table 2.12) ....................................................... 18 Alternative E - Open Roads to be Closed (Table 2.13) ................................................ 18 Alternative E - Game Retrieval (Table 2.14) ................................................................ 18 Alternative F - Designated Road Use (Table 2.15) ....................................................... 19 Alternative F - Designated Trail Use (Table 2.16) ....................................................... 19 Alternative F - Open Roads to be Closed (Table 2.17) ................................................ 19 Alternative F - Game Retrieval (Table 2.18) ................................................................ 19 Alternative G - Designated Road Use (Table 2.19) ...................................................... 20 Alternative G - Designated Trail Use (Table 2.20) ...................................................... 20 Alternative G - Open Roads to be Closed (Table 2.21) ............................................... 20 Alternative G - Game Retrieval (Table 2.22) ............................................................... 20 iii Alternative H - Designated Road Use (Table 2.23) ...................................................... 21 Alternative H - Designated Trail Use (Table 2.24) ...................................................... 21 Alternative H - Open Roads to be Closed (Table 2.25) ............................................... 21 Alternative H - Game Retrieval (Table 2.26) ............................................................... 21 Seasonal Use Route Exceptions (Table 2.27) ................................................................ 22 Comparison of Resulting Transportation System by Alternative (Table 2.28) ........ 24 Comparison of Transportation System Change by Alternative (Table 2.29) ..........
Load more

Recommended publications
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • Basecamp for Mountain Adventures
    SPRING SUMMER BASECAMP FOR MOUNTAIN ADVENTURES FALL WINTER MENA ADVERTISING & PROMOTION COMMISSION WWW.VISITMENA.COM 479 ∙ 394 ∙ 8355 IN ANY SEASON WWW.VISITMENA.COM Great outdoors will take on a whole new meaning when you step into our back yard! Hello... this is Lum & Abner. We want you to know that the Lum & Abner Festival is the first weekend in June in Mena at Janssen Park! The event is free and folks get to enjoy live music both nights. There are always all kinds of arts & handcrafted items provided by locals and folks from all around. it always smells good at the lum & abner festival cause of all the tasty food being cooked up by vendors. Lots of other entertainment is happening too. Baby crawling contests, eating contests, fun things for the kiddies, a car show, basketball tournament, and even a 5K run. bring some friends & neighbors. Bring Grandpa, Grandma, cousins, aunts, and uncles. Why... you might even want to bring your mother-in-law. For more information Talimena National Scenic Byway go to www.visitmena.com or call 479-394-8355 Aubrey D. Tapley Park Table of Contents This sports complex is a 74 acre park which was started by Welcome to the Mena Advertising and Promotion Commission in 2003. It was named Aubrey D. Tapley Park in 2009. It currently houses 5 baseball/softball fields, soccer fields, concession The Ouachita Mountains! facilities including a pavilion, and two playgrounds. The complex is the venue for community events such as the Attractions.............................3-8 Annual 4th of July Celebration and multiple baseball/ softball and soccer tournaments each year.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Area Lodging Guide
    VISITMCCURTAINCOUNTY.COM Hwy 259 Ti mb il erwolf Tra Golf Cours Lu e Road ci River Bend an Road C Sorrel edar Creek il Carson ra oad T Creek Area R a k at ee f r k Moun C u odge L Lakeview L Broken Bow r tai n L e Gap Road F ns ork o b e e Rive s v iv t e Dr Reservoir m ail Deer Creek Trail te Coyot r C i r S r T Stevens e T a e t k a Gap Area L u kf Hochatown H T Overlook R 259A ve O Ste ns Gap Creek Beaver Lodge Nature Trails N Radio Tower Beacon 259A River Bend Power Area House Big Oak Hwy Nature Trails 259 Mou H nta in T Fo rk R R iver Beavers Bend O Gr 259A N a State Park v Reregulation Dam el R 4.3 Miles oad Public Presbyterian Use Area Falls Hwy ile Hwy 1 M 7 Steel iles 70 3 Junction 259 5 M d a Oak Hill o R Broken g i Bow a r 70 BUS C N 70 . Craig Road NW Texas Ave. C e n t r H a l T A v R e BUS . O Hwy N Broken 70 259 t t MLK Dr. Bow d e SE Washington St. e 10th St. a e e o r C r t e t 9th St. R n S S t e e y y r 8th St. m a v v a a a i i l r r w 70 w A D 7th St.
    [Show full text]
  • Property for Sale Broken Bow Oklahoma
    Property For Sale Broken Bow Oklahoma Inertial and shrinelike Ragnar industrialised while stupefacient Sigmund overlards her populace uncommendably and embrangles weekdays. Warped and actionable Sergio caviling while battle-scarred Arvind epistolising her obligatoriness significatively and cinchonizes violently. Diego tunnel her pseudonyms unhappily, synecologic and conjugate. How the help you for oklahoma or as your vacation destination weekend with increasing as slings now Tate operates a standing cattle ranch in elaborate Bow OK with the help of you beloved helper Pepper a devoted blue heeler Ridgeview 41 Acres SOLD 75 Acre. Even more details and the eastern wild turkey constructs development. Broken Bow Waterfront Properties for Sale United Country. REAL ESTATE The median home farm in each Bow hook Real Estate 6300 Home appreciation the last 10 years has been 37. You for sale by owner financed properties is prime hunting land adjacent to check with all property listed as bow lake and hochatown, personal countryside escape. Tripadvisor finding the property for properties are standing in bow! Groups and property in oklahoma general area and sits on the lost creek area are you may discover an easy. Broken Bow OK real estate listings and homes for honest home. Travelocity has been easier to the family homes, llc is to the cabin building lots for lease situation is. Find property for oklahoma land. Just minutes from motivated sellers to hunt hogs, hiking trails southwest and appliances, texas real estate requirements in bow property for sale broken oklahoma? The broken bow cabins for properties for individuals with plenty of space for captcha below for dian jordan said, no rent out homes on front access.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Affiliation Statement for Buffalo National River
    CULTURAL AFFILIATION STATEMENT BUFFALO NATIONAL RIVER, ARKANSAS Final Report Prepared by María Nieves Zedeño Nicholas Laluk Prepared for National Park Service Midwest Region Under Contract Agreement CA 1248-00-02 Task Agreement J6068050087 UAZ-176 Bureau of Applied Research In Anthropology The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85711 June 1, 2008 Table of Contents and Figures Summary of Findings...........................................................................................................2 Chapter One: Study Overview.............................................................................................5 Chapter Two: Cultural History of Buffalo National River ................................................15 Chapter Three: Protohistoric Ethnic Groups......................................................................41 Chapter Four: The Aboriginal Group ................................................................................64 Chapter Five: Emigrant Tribes...........................................................................................93 References Cited ..............................................................................................................109 Selected Annotations .......................................................................................................137 Figure 1. Buffalo National River, Arkansas ........................................................................6 Figure 2. Sixteenth Century Polities and Ethnic Groups (after Sabo 2001) ......................47
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 51/Monday, March 16, 2020
    Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 51 / Monday, March 16, 2020 / Proposed Rules 14847 October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, Dated: March 2, 2020. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, January 21, 2011); John W. Busterud, identified by Docket No. EPA–R06– • Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 Regional Administrator, Region IX. OAR–2015–0189, at http:// FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory [FR Doc. 2020–05331 Filed 3–13–20; 8:45 am] www.regulations.gov or via email to _ action because SIP approvals are BILLING CODE 6560–50–P R6AIR [email protected]. Follow the exempted under Executive Order 12866; online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments • Does not impose an information ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION cannot be edited or removed from collection burden under the provisions AGENCY Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 any comment received to its public U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 40 CFR Part 52 docket. Do not submit any information • Is certified as not having a [EPA–R06–OAR–2015–0189; FRL–10006– electronically that is considered to be significant economic impact on a 02–Region 6] Confidential Business Information (CBI) substantial number of small entities or other information whose disclosure is under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 Air Plan Approval; Arkansas; Arkansas restricted by statute. Multimedia U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Regional Haze and Visibility Transport submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be • Does not contain any unfunded State Implementation Plan Revisions accompanied by a written comment. mandate or significantly or uniquely and Withdrawal of Federal The written comment is considered the affect small governments, as described Implementation Plan official comment with multimedia in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act AGENCY: Environmental Protection submissions and should include all of 1995 (Pub.
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas Academy of Science
    Journal of the CODEN: AKASO ISBN: 0097-4374 ARKANSAS ACADEMY OF SCIENCE VOLUME 61 2007 Library Rate ARKANSAS ACADEMY OF SCIENCE ARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICAL SCIENCES 1701 N. BOULDER RUSSELLVILLE. AR 72801-2222 Arkansas Academy ofScience, Dept. of Physical Sciences, Arkansas Tech University PAST PRESIDENTS OF THE ARKANSAS ACADEMY OF SCIENCE Charles Brookover, 1917 C. E. Hoffman, 1959 Paul Sharrah, 1984 Dwight M. Moore, 1932-33, 64 N. D. Buffaloe, 1960 William L. Evans, 1985 Flora Haas, 1934 H. L. Bogan, 1961 Gary Heidt, 1986 H. H. Hyman, 1935 Trumann McEver, 1962 Edmond Bacon, 1987 L. B. Ham, 1936 Robert Shideler, 1963 Gary Tucker, 1988 W. C. Muon, 1937 L. F. Bailey, 1965 David Chittenden, 1989 M. J. McHenry, 1938 James H. Fribourgh, 1966 Richard K. Speairs, Jr. 1990 T. L. Smith, 1939 Howard Moore, 1967 Robert Watson, 1991 P. G. Horton, 1940 John J. Chapman, 1968 Michael W. Rapp, 1992 I. A. Willis, 1941-42 Arthur Fry, 1969 Arthur A. Johnson, 1993 L. B. Roberts, 1943-44 M. L. Lawson, 1970 George Harp, 1994 JeffBanks, 1945 R. T. Kirkwood, 1971 James Peck, 1995 H. L. Winburn, 1946-47 George E. Templeton, 1972 Peggy R. Dorris, 1996 E. A. Provine, 1948 E. B. Wittlake, 1973 Richard Kluender, 1997 G. V. Robinette, 1949 Clark McCarty, 1974 James Daly, 1998 John R. Totter, 1950 Edward Dale, 1975 Rose McConnell, 1999 R. H. Austin, 1951 Joe Guenter, 1976 Mostafa Hemmati, 2000 E. A. Spessard, 1952 Jewel Moore, 1977 Mark Draganjac, 2001 Delbert Swartz, 1953 Joe Nix, 1978 John Rickett, 2002 Z.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Ecology and Habitat Preference of the Leopard Darter, Percina Pantherina
    REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY AND HABITAT PREFERENCE OF THE LEOPARD DARTER, PERCINA PANTHERINA By PAUL WILLIAM /~AMES Bachelor of Science University of Kansas Lawrence, Kansas 1981 ·4::er of Science ...1.issouri State University 3pringfield, Missouri 1983 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the·Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY July, 1989 . - ~· ,• ) "' Oklahoma State Univ. Lihra1 REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY AND HABITAT PREFERENCE OF THE LEOPARD DARTER, PERCINA PANTHERINA Thesis Approved: ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank my advisor, Dr. o. Eugene Maughan, for giving me the opportunity to work on this project and for his encouragement throughout my graduate program. I would also like to thank the members of my graduate committee, Dr. William A. Drew, Dr. Anthony A. Echelle, Dr. Rudolph J. Miller, and Dr. Alexander v. Zale, for their professional and personal advice throughout the course of the study. I wish to extend my sincere gratitude to the u. s. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, and the Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit for providing financial and technical support for the study. I am especially grateful to Mr. Frank James of the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation's McCurtain County Wilderness Area for his friendship and hospitality during extended field trips. A sincere thanks goes to Rick Horton, Steve O'Donnell, and Todd Phillips for their help in the field and laboratory. A special thanks goes to Stuart Leon for helping with the development of many of the field and data analysis techniques used in this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Population and Conservation Biology of The
    POPULATION AND CONSERVATION BIOLOGY OF THE THREATENED LEOPARD DARTER By CONRAD STEFAN TOEPFER Bachelor of Science Centre College Danville, Kentucky 1990 Master of Science Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, Louisiana 1992 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY July, 1997 p::t q '1 D 1 t,1,r >P POPULATION AND CONSERVATION BIOLOGY OF THE THREATENED LEOPARD DARTER Thesis Approved: dJ~?t~ Thesis Adviser ~· Dean of the Graduate College ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank my adviser, Dr. William L. Fisher, for his encouragement and assistance on this project. He allowed me to flourish, and I will always value his contribution to my future. I would also like to thank the members of my committee, Dr. Tony Echelle, Dr. Stan Fox, Dr. Don Turton, and Dr. Emily Stanley, for their advice during the course of my research. I would like to thank the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, U.S. Fish and Widlife Service, and the Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit for their financial support of the study. I would like to extend special thanks to Ken Collins at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Ecological Services Office for his assistance in obtaining additional funding and special permits and for his general advice and insights concerning leopard darters. I appreciate a number of students and family members that helped with field work. I extend my thanks to Rex iii Anderson, Mike Sams, Mike Miller, Jason Ballew, and Tracy Brotherton.
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle Rock Loop Trail Recreational Trail the Ground
    It’s a simple thing, really: a well-trod path through a place otherwise untouched, a scraggly aisle cut through a sun-dappled canopy. It’s rudimental and practical. It’s a way through. But as the eight routes featured in these pages prove, an Arkansas hiking trail can be far, far more than just a means to an end Edited by Wyndham Wyeth 60 ARKANSAS LIFE www.arkansaslife.com OCTOBER 2016 ARKANSAS LIFE 61 R. Kenny Vernon 64 Nature Trail 76 Ouachita National “Stand absolutely still and study Eagle Rock Loop Trail Recreational Trail the ground. Look for the clusters of acorns the blackjack oak has tossed aside; the horn of plenty ’VE ALWAYS BEEN OF THE MIND THAT those may live nearby.” who talk down about Arkansas have never actually set foot in the state. Surely, those folks have never been fortunate enough to see the unyielding natural beauty that abounds in this neck of the woods we call home. When it comes to the great outdoors, the variety found in The Natural State is inexhaustible. From the IBuffalo, the country’s first national river, to our state’s highest peak on Mount Magazine, and all manner of flora and fauna in between, the call of the Arkansas wild is difficult to resist. 70 But if you want to discuss Arkansas and its eminence in all things outside, you’d be remiss if you failed to address the hiking trails, Mount Nebo Bench Trail those hand-cut paths through terrain both savage and tamed that represent Arkansas in its purest form.
    [Show full text]
  • Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment December 2003
    Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment December 2003 Ouachita Ecoregional Assessment Team Arkansas Field Office 601 North University Ave. Little Rock, AR 72205 Oklahoma Field Office 2727 East 21st Street Tulsa, OK 74114 Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment ii 12/2003 Table of Contents Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment............................................................................................................................i Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................................................iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..............................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................3 BACKGROUND ...........................................................................................................................4 Ecoregional Boundary Delineation.............................................................................................................................................4 Geology..........................................................................................................................................................................................5 Soils................................................................................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORIC PLACES in SOUTH CAROLINA ////////////////////////////// September 2015
    AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORIC PLACES IN SOUTH CAROLINA ////////////////////////////// September 2015 State Historic Preservation Office South Carolina Department of Archives and History should be encouraged. The National Register program his publication provides information on properties in South Carolina is administered by the State Historic in South Carolina that are listed in the National Preservation Office at the South Carolina Department of Register of Historic Places or have been Archives and History. recognized with South Carolina Historical Markers This publication includes summary information about T as of May 2015 and have important associations National Register properties in South Carolina that are with African American history. More information on these significantly associated with African American history. More and other properties is available at the South Carolina extensive information about many of these properties is Archives and History Center. Many other places in South available in the National Register files at the South Carolina Carolina are important to our African American history and Archives and History Center. Many of the National Register heritage and are eligible for listing in the National Register nominations are also available online, accessible through or recognition with the South Carolina Historical Marker the agency’s website. program. The State Historic Preservation Office at the South Carolina Department of Archives and History welcomes South Carolina Historical Marker Program (HM) questions regarding the listing or marking of other eligible South Carolina Historical Markers recognize and interpret sites. places important to an understanding of South Carolina’s past. The cast-aluminum markers can tell the stories of African Americans have made a vast contribution to buildings and structures that are still standing, or they can the history of South Carolina throughout its over-300-year- commemorate the sites of important historic events or history.
    [Show full text]