Ecology of the Genus Burkholderia in the Soil

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ecology of the Genus Burkholderia in the Soil Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2014 Ecology of the Genus Burkholderia in the Soil Stopnisek, Nejc Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-101419 Dissertation Originally published at: Stopnisek, Nejc. Ecology of the Genus Burkholderia in the Soil. 2014, University of Zurich, Faculty of Science. Ecology of the Genus Burkholderia in the Soil Dissertation zur Erlangung der naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorwürde (Dr. sc. nat.) vorgelegt der Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Zürich von Nejc Stopnisek aus Slowenien Promotionskomitee Prof. Dr. Leo Eberl (Vorsitz) Prof. Dr. Jakob Pernthaler Dr. Laure Weisskopf Zürich, 2014 Ago Table of Contents Summary ........................................................................................................................ I Zusammenfassung ........................................................................................................ III Abbreviations ................................................................................................................ V General introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 The genus Burkholderia ........................................................................................................... 1 Soil as habitat for Burkholderia the genus ......................................................................... 5 Burkholderia in the soil ............................................................................................................ 7 Burkholderia tolerance mechanisms relevant in acidic soils...................................... 8 Ecological functions Burkholderia of in the soil ............................................................... 9 Interactions of Burkholderia species with soil microbes ............................................. 9 Aims of the thesis ........................................................................................................ 12 Part I: Biogeography of Burkholderia sp. in soil ......................................................... 13 Aims of the project.................................................................................................................. 13 Unpublished results ............................................................................................................... 14 Design of a quantitative PCR (qPCR) protocol targeting the Burkholderia 16S rRNA gene ............................................................................................................................................................ 14 Primer selection and specificity assessment ....................................................................................... 14 Optimization of the qPCR method and Burkholderia measurement of sp. relative abundance in soils ........................................................................................................................................... 16 Effect of pH change on the abundance of the genus Burkholderia ................................ 18 Material and methods .................................................................................................................................... 18 Results and discussion ................................................................................................................................... 20 Published Results .................................................................................................................... 24 Part II: Burkholderia-fungi interactions ....................................................................... 41 Aims of the project.................................................................................................................. 41 Unpublished results ............................................................................................................... 42 Effect of fungal presence and absence on e Burkholderia relativ abundance in the soil ............................................................................................................................................................... 42 Methods and material .................................................................................................................................... 42 Results and discussion ................................................................................................................................... 43 Genome of B. glathei LMG14190 .................................................................................................... 46 Materials and methods .................................................................................................................................. 46 Results and discussion ................................................................................................................................... 46 Published results ..................................................................................................................... 50 Molecular mechanisms underlying the close between association soil Burkholderia and fungi ................................................................................................................................................... 50 Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................ 51 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 52 Methods ................................................................................................................................................................ 54 Results and discussion ................................................................................................................................... 59 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................................... 70 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................................... 71 Literature ............................................................................................................................................................. 72 Tables, figures and legends.......................................................................................................................... 81 Supplementary legends and figures......................................................................................................... 88 Part III: Role of oxalotrophy in Burkholderia – plant interactions .............................. 89 Aims of the project.................................................................................................................. 89 Published results ..................................................................................................................... 91 General Conclusions .................................................................................................. 106 Outlook ...................................................................................................................... 110 Literature .................................................................................................................... 111 Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................... 121 Appendix .................................................................................................................... 123 List of transporters predicted from online tool TransAPP ..................................... 123 Curriculum vitae ........................................................................................................ 152 Summary The genus Burkholderia consists of 86 phylogenetically closely related species that are metabolically highly versatile. This enables them to be ubiquitously present in the environment as free-living bacteria as well as in antagonistic, mutualistic or symbiotic associations with plants, fungi and animals. Soil is the environment that contains the largest pool of Burkholderia diversity. Soil Burkholderia are involved in a large number of processes, such as decomposition of organic matter, detoxification/removal of pollutants or nitrogen fixation. Even though these processes are well understood, there is still a lack of knowledge regarding the ecology of Burkholderia in the soil. To better understand the environmental parameters affecting Burkholderia distribution and abundance in the soil we investigated the relative abundance of the genus Burkholderia in the soil at a trans-continental and at a local scale and correlate the obtained abundances with environmental parameters. The results showed that Burkholderia relative abundance was significantly influenced by soil pH. In contrast to most bacteria, Burkholderia favored low pH environments and were undetectable in neutral and alkaline soils. However, while their relative abundance was influenced by the soil pH, their diversity was not. Moreover, in vitro growth experiments revealed that although they are
Recommended publications
  • USDA/APHIS Environmental Assessment
    Finding of No Significant Impact and Decision Notice Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Issuance of Permit to Release Genetically-Engineered Burkholderia glumae The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) has received a permit application (APHIS number 06-111-01r) from Dr. Martin Rush at the Louisiana State University to conduct a field trial using strains of the bacterium Burkholderia glumae. Permit application 06-111-01r describes four Burkholderia glumae strains: Two wild-type strains endemic to the United States, one of which causes panicle blight on rice and the other naturally non-pathogenic, and two genetically engineered, non-pathogenic strains that share the same avirulent phenotype. A description of the field tests may be found in the attached Environmental Assessment (EA), which was prepared pursuant to APHIS regulations (7 CFR part 372) promulgated under the National Environmental Policy Act. The field tests are scheduled to begin in August 2007 in East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana. An EA was prepared and submitted for public comment for 30 days. One comment that raised 5 issues was received and the issues are addressed in an attachment to this document. APHIS proposed three different actions to take in response to the permit application: • the denial of the permit (Alternative A) • the granting of the permit with no Supplemental Permit Conditions (Alternative B) • the granting of the permit with Supplemental Permit Conditions containing duplicative safety measures and reporting requirements (Alternative C) APHIS chose Alternative C as its Preferred Alternative. Based upon analysis described in the EA, APHIS has determined that the action proposed in Alternative C will not have a significant impact on the quality of the human environment because: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Crystal Structures of the Burkholderia Multivorans Hopanoid Transporter Hpnn
    Crystal structures of the Burkholderia multivorans hopanoid transporter HpnN Nitin Kumara,1, Chih-Chia Sub,1, Tsung-Han Choub, Abhijith Radhakrishnana, Jared A. Delmarb, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankarc,d, and Edward W. Yua,b,2 aDepartment of Chemistry, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011; bDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, IA 50011; cNortheastern Collaborative Access Team, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439; and dDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850 Edited by Eric Gouaux, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, and approved May 15, 2017 (received for review November 30, 2016) Strains of the Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) are Gram-negative critical line of defense against antimicrobial agents in Burkholderia opportunisitic bacteria that are capable of causing serious diseases, species is the permeability barrier of the outer membrane. Most of mainly in immunocompromised individuals. Bcc pathogens are in- these species contain a modified lipopolysaccharide, which results in trinsically resistant to multiple antibiotics, including β-lactams, ami- polymyxin resistance (13). In addition, the permeability of the major noglycosides, fluoroquinolones, and polymyxins. They are major outer membrane porin channel Omp38 appears to be low for an- pathogens in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and can cause severe tibiotics (14). The presence of a large number of multidrug efflux necrotizing pneumonia, which is often fatal. Hopanoid biosynthesis pumps, belonging to the resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) is one of the major mechanisms involved in multiple antimicrobial superfamily, also plays a major role in the intrinsic resistance to a resistance of Bcc pathogens. The hpnN gene of B.
    [Show full text]
  • Burkholderia Cenocepacia Integrates Cis-2-Dodecenoic Acid and Cyclic Dimeric Guanosine Monophosphate Signals to Control Virulence
    Burkholderia cenocepacia integrates cis-2-dodecenoic acid and cyclic dimeric guanosine monophosphate signals to control virulence Chunxi Yanga,b,c,d,1, Chaoyu Cuia,b,c,1, Qiumian Yea,b, Jinhong Kane, Shuna Fua,b, Shihao Songa,b, Yutong Huanga,b, Fei Hec, Lian-Hui Zhanga,c, Yantao Jiaf, Yong-Gui Gaod, Caroline S. Harwoodb,g,2, and Yinyue Denga,b,c,2 aState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; bGuangdong Innovative Research Team of Sociomicrobiology, College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; cIntegrative Microbiology Research Centre, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; dSchool of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637551; eCenter for Crop Germplasm Resources, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; fState Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; and gDepartment of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 Contributed by Caroline S. Harwood, October 30, 2017 (sent for review June 1, 2017; reviewed by Maxwell J. Dow and Tim Tolker-Nielsen) Quorum sensing (QS) signals are used by bacteria to regulate N-octanoyl homoserine lactone (C8-HSL). The two QS systems biological functions in response to cell population densities. Cyclic have both distinct and overlapping effects on gene expression diguanosine monophosphate (c-di-GMP) regulates cell functions in (16, 17). response to diverse environmental chemical and physical signals One of the ways in which QS systems can act is by controlling that bacteria perceive. In Burkholderia cenocepacia, the QS signal levels of intracellular cyclic diguanosine monophosphate (c-di-GMP) receptor RpfR degrades intracellular c-di-GMP when it senses the in bacteria (18–21).
    [Show full text]
  • Product Information Sheet for NR-705
    Product Information Sheet for NR-705 Burkholderia multivorans, Strain LMG stored at -60°C or colder immediately upon arrival. For ® long-term storage, the vapor phase of a liquid nitrogen 13010 (ATCC BAA-247) freezer is recommended. Freeze-thaw cycles should be avoided. Catalog No. NR-705 (Derived from ATCC® BAA-247) Growth Conditions: Media: Tryptic Soy broth or equivalent For research only. Not for human use. Tryptic Soy agar or equivalent Incubation: Contributor: ® Temperature: 30°C ATCC Atmosphere: Aerobic Propagation: Manufacturer: 1. Keep vial frozen until ready for use; then thaw. BEI Resources 2. Transfer the entire thawed aliquot into a single tube of broth. Product Description: 3. Use several drops of the suspension to inoculate an Bacteria Classification: Burkholderiaceae, Burkholderia agar slant and/or plate. Species: Burkholderia multivorans (formerly Burkholderia 4. Incubate the tube, slant and/or plate for 24 to 48 hours. cepacia genomovar II)1 ® Strain: Type strain, LMG 13010 (ATCC BAA-247, CCUG Citation: 34080, Lauwers Cepa 002, CIP 105495, DSM 13243, Acknowledgment for publications should read “The following NCTC 13007) reagent was obtained through BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH: Original Source: Burkholderia multivorans (B. multivorans), Burkholderia multivorans, Strain LMG 13010 (ATCC® BAA- strain LMG 13010 was isolated in 1992 from the sputum of 1 247), NR-705.” a cystic fibrosis patient in Belgium. Comments: B. multivorans, strain LMG 13010 was deposited ® Biosafety Level: 2 at the ATCC in 2001 by Dr. D. Janssens from Appropriate safety procedures should always be used with BCCM/LMG Bacteria Collection, Ghent University, Ghent, this material. Laboratory safety is discussed in the following Belgium.
    [Show full text]
  • Accurate and Rapid Identification of the Burkholderia Pseudomallei Near-Neighbour, Burkholderia Ubonensis, Using Real-Time PCR
    Accurate and Rapid Identification of the Burkholderia pseudomallei Near-Neighbour, Burkholderia ubonensis, Using Real-Time PCR Erin P. Price1*, Derek S. Sarovich1, Jessica R. Webb1, Jennifer L. Ginther2, Mark Mayo1, James M. Cook2, Meagan L. Seymour2, Mirjam Kaestli1, Vanessa Theobald1, Carina M. Hall2, Joseph D. Busch2, Jeffrey T. Foster2, Paul Keim2, David M. Wagner2, Apichai Tuanyok2, Talima Pearson2, Bart J. Currie1 1 Global and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia, 2 Center for Microbial Genetics and Genomics, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, United States of America Abstract Burkholderia ubonensis is an environmental bacterium belonging to the Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc), a group of genetically related organisms that are associated with opportunistic but generally nonfatal infections in healthy individuals. In contrast, the near-neighbour species Burkholderia pseudomallei causes melioidosis, a disease that can be fatal in up to 95% of cases if left untreated. B. ubonensis is frequently misidentified as B. pseudomallei from soil samples using selective culturing on Ashdown’s medium, reflecting both the shared environmental niche and morphological similarities of these species. Additionally, B. ubonensis shows potential as an important biocontrol agent in B. pseudomallei-endemic regions as certain strains possess antagonistic properties towards B. pseudomallei. Current methods for characterising B. ubonensis are laborious, time-consuming and costly, and as such this bacterium remains poorly studied. The aim of our study was to develop a rapid and inexpensive real-time PCR-based assay specific for B. ubonensis. We demonstrate that a novel B. ubonensis-specific assay, Bu550, accurately differentiates B. ubonensis from B.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Genome Analyses Suggests That Burkholderia Sensu Lato Contains Two Additional Novel Genera (Mycetohabitans Gen
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article Whole Genome Analyses Suggests that Burkholderia sensu lato Contains Two Additional Novel Genera (Mycetohabitans gen. nov., and Trinickia gen. nov.): Implications for the Evolution of Diazotrophy and Nodulation in the Burkholderiaceae Paulina Estrada-de los Santos 1,*,† ID , Marike Palmer 2,†, Belén Chávez-Ramírez 1, Chrizelle Beukes 2, Emma T. Steenkamp 2, Leah Briscoe 3, Noor Khan 3 ID , Marta Maluk 4, Marcel Lafos 4, Ethan Humm 3, Monique Arrabit 3, Matthew Crook 5, Eduardo Gross 6 ID , Marcelo F. Simon 7,Fábio Bueno dos Reis Junior 8, William B. Whitman 9, Nicole Shapiro 10, Philip S. Poole 11, Ann M. Hirsch 3,* ID , Stephanus N. Venter 2,* ID and Euan K. James 4,* ID 1 Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, 11340 Cd. de Mexico, Mexico; [email protected] 2 Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0083, South Africa; [email protected] (M.P.); [email protected] (C.B.); [email protected] (E.T.S.) 3 Department of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology and Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; [email protected] (L.B.); [email protected] (N.K.); [email protected] (E.H.); [email protected] (M.A.) 4 The James Hutton Institute, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK; [email protected] (M.M.); [email protected] (M.L.) 5 450G Tracy Hall Science Building, Weber State University, Ogden, 84403 UT, USA; [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Burkholderia Cenocepacia Intracellular Activation of the Pyrin
    Activation of the Pyrin Inflammasome by Intracellular Burkholderia cenocepacia Mikhail A. Gavrilin, Dalia H. A. Abdelaziz, Mahmoud Mostafa, Basant A. Abdulrahman, Jaykumar Grandhi, This information is current as Anwari Akhter, Arwa Abu Khweek, Daniel F. Aubert, of September 29, 2021. Miguel A. Valvano, Mark D. Wewers and Amal O. Amer J Immunol 2012; 188:3469-3477; Prepublished online 24 February 2012; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102272 Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/content/188/7/3469 Supplementary http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2012/02/24/jimmunol.110227 Material 2.DC1 http://www.jimmunol.org/ References This article cites 71 articles, 17 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/188/7/3469.full#ref-list-1 Why The JI? Submit online. • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision by guest on September 29, 2021 • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2012 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. The Journal of Immunology Activation of the Pyrin Inflammasome by Intracellular Burkholderia cenocepacia Mikhail A.
    [Show full text]
  • Iron Transport Strategies of the Genus Burkholderia
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2015 Iron transport strategies of the genus Burkholderia Mathew, Anugraha Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-113412 Dissertation Published Version Originally published at: Mathew, Anugraha. Iron transport strategies of the genus Burkholderia. 2015, University of Zurich, Faculty of Science. Iron transport strategies of the genus Burkholderia Dissertation zur Erlangung der naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorwürde (Dr. sc. nat.) vorgelegt der Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Zürich von Anugraha Mathew aus Indien Promotionskomitee Prof. Dr. Leo Eberl (Vorsitz) Prof. Dr. Jakob Pernthaler Dr. Aurelien carlier Zürich, 2015 2 Table of Contents Summary .............................................................................................................. 7 Zusammenfassung ................................................................................................ 9 Abbreviations ..................................................................................................... 11 Chapter 1: Introduction ....................................................................................... 14 1.1.Role and properties of iron in bacteria ...................................................................... 14 1.2.Iron transport mechanisms in bacteria .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Volcanic Soils As Sources of Novel CO-Oxidizing Paraburkholderia and Burkholderia: Paraburkholderia Hiiakae Sp
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Frontiers - Publisher Connector ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 21 February 2017 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00207 Volcanic Soils as Sources of Novel CO-Oxidizing Paraburkholderia and Burkholderia: Paraburkholderia hiiakae sp. nov., Paraburkholderia metrosideri sp. nov., Paraburkholderia paradisi sp. nov., Edited by: Paraburkholderia peleae sp. nov., Svetlana N. Dedysh, Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology and Burkholderia alpina sp. nov. a (RAS), Russia Reviewed by: Member of the Burkholderia cepacia Dimitry Y. Sorokin, The Federal Research Centre Complex “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1, 2 1 Russia Carolyn F. Weber and Gary M. King * Philippe Constant, 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA, 2 College of Health Sciences, Des INRS-Institut Armand-Frappier, Moines University, Des Moines, IA, USA Canada Paulina Estrada De Los Santos, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico Previous studies showed that members of the Burkholderiales were important in *Correspondence: the succession of aerobic, molybdenum-dependent CO oxidizing-bacteria on volcanic Gary M. King [email protected] soils. During these studies, four isolates were obtained from Kilauea Volcano (Hawai‘i, USA); one strain was isolated from Pico de Orizaba (Mexico) during a separate Specialty section: study. Based on 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities, the Pico de Orizaba isolate This article was submitted to Terrestrial Microbiology, and the isolates from Kilauea Volcano were provisionally assigned to the genera a section of the journal Burkholderia and Paraburkholderia, respectively. Each of the isolates possessed a form Frontiers in Microbiology I coxL gene that encoded the catalytic subunit of carbon monoxide dehydrogenase Received: 09 December 2016 (CODH); none of the most closely related type strains possessed coxL or oxidized Accepted: 30 January 2017 Published: 21 February 2017 CO.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of the Burkholderia Cenocepacia J2315 Surface-Exposed Immunoproteome
    Article Characterization of the Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315 Surface-Exposed Immunoproteome 1, 1, 1, Sílvia A. Sousa * , António M.M. Seixas y , Manoj Mandal y, Manuel J. Rodríguez-Ortega 2 and Jorge H. Leitão 1,* 1 iBB–Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal; [email protected] (A.M.M.S.); [email protected] (M.M.) 2 Departament of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Córdoba University, 14071 Córdoba, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (S.A.S.); [email protected] (J.H.L.); Tel.: +351-2184-19986 (S.A.S.); +351-2184-17688 (J.H.L.) Both authors contributed equally to the work. y Received: 31 July 2020; Accepted: 3 September 2020; Published: 6 September 2020 Abstract: Infections by the Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) remain seriously life threatening to cystic fibrosis (CF) patients, and no effective eradication is available. A vaccine to protect patients against Bcc infections is a highly attractive therapeutic option, but none is available. A strategy combining the bioinformatics identification of putative surface-exposed proteins with an experimental approach encompassing the “shaving” of surface-exposed proteins with trypsin followed by peptide identification by liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry is here reported. The methodology allowed the bioinformatics identification of 263 potentially surface-exposed proteins, 16 of them also experimentally identified by the “shaving” approach. Of the proteins identified, 143 have a high probability of containing B-cell epitopes that are surface-exposed. The immunogenicity of three of these proteins was demonstrated using serum samples from Bcc-infected CF patients and Western blotting, validating the usefulness of this methodology in identifying potentially immunogenic surface-exposed proteins that might be used for the development of Bcc-protective vaccines.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeting the Burkholderia Cepacia Complex
    viruses Review Advances in Phage Therapy: Targeting the Burkholderia cepacia Complex Philip Lauman and Jonathan J. Dennis * Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-780-492-2529 Abstract: The increasing prevalence and worldwide distribution of multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens is an imminent danger to public health and threatens virtually all aspects of modern medicine. Particularly concerning, yet insufficiently addressed, are the members of the Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc), a group of at least twenty opportunistic, hospital-transmitted, and notoriously drug-resistant species, which infect and cause morbidity in patients who are immunocompromised and those afflicted with chronic illnesses, including cystic fibrosis (CF) and chronic granulomatous disease (CGD). One potential solution to the antimicrobial resistance crisis is phage therapy—the use of phages for the treatment of bacterial infections. Although phage therapy has a long and somewhat checkered history, an impressive volume of modern research has been amassed in the past decades to show that when applied through specific, scientifically supported treatment strategies, phage therapy is highly efficacious and is a promising avenue against drug-resistant and difficult-to-treat pathogens, such as the Bcc. In this review, we discuss the clinical significance of the Bcc, the advantages of phage therapy, and the theoretical and clinical advancements made in phage therapy in general over the past decades, and apply these concepts specifically to the nascent, but growing and rapidly developing, field of Bcc phage therapy. Keywords: Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc); bacteria; pathogenesis; antibiotic resistance; bacterio- phages; phages; phage therapy; phage therapy treatment strategies; Bcc phage therapy Citation: Lauman, P.; Dennis, J.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Epidemiology of Burkholderia Cepacia Complex in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis, Canada David P
    RESEARCH Epidemiology of Burkholderia cepacia Complex in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis, Canada David P. Speert,* Deborah Henry,* Peter Vandamme,† Mary Corey,‡ and Eshwar Mahenthiralingam* The Burkholderia cepacia complex is an important group of pathogens in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Although evidence for patient-to-patient spread is clear, microbial factors facilitating transmission are poorly understood. To identify microbial clones with enhanced transmissibility, we evaluated B. cepacia complex isolates from patients with CF from throughout Canada. A total of 905 isolates from the B. cepacia complex were recovered from 447 patients in 8 of the 10 provinces; 369 (83%) of these patients had genomovar III and 43 (9.6%) had B. multivorans (genomovar II). Infection prevalence differed substantially by region (22% of patients in Ontario vs. 5% in Quebec). Results of typing by random amplified polymor- phic DNA analysis or pulsed-field gel electrophoresis indicated that strains of B. cepacia complex from genomovar III are the most potentially transmissible and that the B. cepacia epidemic strain marker is a robust marker for transmissibility. urkholderia cepacia complex is an important group of and genomovar VII = B. ambifaria. Genomovars I and III can- B pathogens in immunocompromised hosts, notably those not be differentiated phenotypically, nor can B. multivorans with cystic fibrosis (CF) or chronic granulomatous disease and genomovar VI; these species must be distinguished by (1,2). Lung infections with B. cepacia complex in certain genetic methods. Bacteria from each of the genomovars have patients with CF result in rapidly progressive, invasive, fatal been recovered from patients with CF, but the predominant bacteremic disease (3).
    [Show full text]