DOCSLIB.ORG

Mating Systems and Parental Investment Mating Systems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mating Systems and Parental Investment Mating Systems Mating systems and parental investment Mating systems Pattern of matings in a population green anole Antithesis = promiscuity Polygyny Polygyny Scramble: no attempts to defend females, resources horseshoe crabs Northern barred frog Female defense: must be clustered elk Montezuma’s oropendola Dulichiella spp. Polygyny Resource distribution Resource defense: males defend food, nest sites Distribution of females affects Red-winged blackbird Lamprologus cichlid males’ ability to guard them Males cannot monopolize wide-ranging females dunnock 1 Polygyny threshold Polygyny threshold Male with no other females (monogamy) Male with other female(s) polygyny threshold ??? Quality of male’s territory Polygyny threshold Male dominance polygyny When females and sage grouse Polygyny threshold = point at which it’s resources too dispersed, better to be polygynous on a good territory males compete Leks = communal display arenas hammerhead bat Uganda kob Leks Leks High variance in male mating success – 10-20% males achieve >50% copulations – one male got 75% copulations Classical lek: males display in sight of each other Exploded lek: males rely wire-tailed manakin on vocal communication, e.g. kakapo 2 Leks Leks • Hotshots • Hotshots – Females attracted to lek by dominant male – Females attracted to lek by dominant male • Hotspots – Leks located in high-use areas Leks Leks • Hotshots Position of most successful – Females attracted to lek by dominant male male territory shifts (hot shot?) • Hotspots black grouse – Leks located in high-use areas • Female preferences – Females prefer large groups of males Removal of dominant male may cause lek to shift, disband Leks Paradox of the lek Lek placement varies with respect to female density (hot spot??) How is genetic variation maintained? Hamilton Rowe and Zuk and Houle 3 Paradox of the lek Polyandry • Usually characterized by If females mate once, why do leks form? sex-role reversals • Factors favoring polyandry include – Male-biased sex ratio Wilson’s – Precocial offspring jacana phalarope – Superabundant food Polyandry Monogamy Given sex differences in gamete production, why monogamy? spotted sandpiper x Clutch manipulations Selects for production reveal incubation of two clutches constrained at four eggs Monogamy Monogamy Occurs in species where females are widely distributed, rarely encountered Duration may be variable Rare in mammals (<5%) mantis shrimp common in birds (>90%) 4 Mate assistance Mate assistance Important when young are Important where habitat is energetically demanding harsh or offspring survival is low cotton-top tamarins emperor penguins Female + male Female only Female enforcement Extra-pair copulations Conflict of interests between the sexes regarding In some species, >50% offspring are extra-pair young care of offspring, opportunities for additional matings tree swallow 9 8 Female untethered 7 Female tethered 6 5 4 3 2 1 Number of broods of Number 0 0.0 - 0.10 0.91 - 1.0 burying beetle 0.11 - 0.20 0.21 - 0.30 0.31 - 0.40 0.41 - 0.50 0.51 - 0.60 0.61 - 0.70 0.71 - 0.80 0.81 - 0.90 superb fairy wren < 6 min > 6 min Proportion of extra-pair young (EPY) Duration of male pheromone emission 50-90% EPY (avg. 78%) Why do females solicit EPCs? Why do females solicit EPCs? Material benefits? Material benefits? scorpionfly • EPCs are less “institutionalized” version of polyandry • Many of the same benefits apply Adelie penguins get rocks from EPC partners 5 Why do females solicit EPCs? Why do females solicit EPCs? Male defense Genetic benefits …against nest predators …against infanticidal males – Guard against poor sperm quality of mate red-winged blackbird Hanuman langur 32% predation on females with EPY 54% predation on females with no EPY Females may mate often pseudoscorpion to confuse paternity Why do females solicit EPCs? Why do females solicit EPCs? Genetic benefits Genetic benefits – Guard against poor sperm quality of mate – Guard against poor sperm quality of mate – Increase genetic diversity of offspring – Increase genetic diversity of offspring – Mate with genetically superior male bluethroat blue tit EPCs in humans Parental investment Population % nonpaternity southern Africa (!Kung) 2 rural Michigan, USA ~10 Munich and Copenhagen >10 Italy 13.2 India 15.3 urban Michigan, USA 20.1 Liverpool, UK 20-30 6 Parental investment Parental investment Behavior that increases Nutrition in egg fitness of offspring at cost to parent Pre-hatching (nest site, protecting eggs) Post-hatching investment is rare Post-hatching (provisioning, lowland gorilla protecting young) Patterns of parental investment Patterns of parental investment mallee fowl • Female-only care predominates 9 8 • Male, biparental 7 6 care is rare 5 = 4 3 2 How do we account for 1 Number of broods of Number 0 the general female bias golden-lion tamarin in parental care? 0.0 - 0.10 0.91 - 1.0 0.11 - 0.20 0.21 - 0.30 0.31 - 0.40 0.41 - 0.50 0.51 - 0.60 0.61 - 0.70 0.71 - 0.80 0.81 - 0.90 Proportion of extra-pair young (EPY) Richard Dawkins Logic suffers from “sunk cost” or What about the abrupt “Concorde” fallacy termination of investment in polyandrous species? Patterns of parental investment Importance of paternity Explained by order of gamete release? Mode of fertilization Extra-pair paternity Provider sex Internal External may select for decreased guppy tree male care Male Few Many piranha swallow Female Many Few If costs to male and female to rear young are the same, but only 3 of 4 chicks are his… How to explain the predominance of male He should reduce his care in frogs where males deposit sperm first? dark-eyed level of investment junco 7 Recognition of unrelated young? Recognition of unrelated young? No apparent discrimination against EPY Alpha, beta male dunnocks care for young in proportion to time spent with female male female Male tree swallows show Male yellow warblers do no feeding bias to own Females may use mating not adjust feeding rate chicks, feed those closest solicitations to manipulate male in response to cuckoldry or most in need parental investment Experimental = male Recognition of unrelated young? Control = male bluegill on nest with bluegill on nest “sneaker” in a jar Why the difference between care of eggs and care of fry? Tested defensive responses to nest predator Sex differences in costs of investment Sex differences in costs of investment St. Peter’s fish giant water bug Male care persists where costs to females exceed costs to males? Male care depends on costs/benefits to male ~11 days ~7 days Large eggs require high level of care 8 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Marriage Outlaws: Regulating Polygamy in America
    Faucon_jci (Do Not Delete) 1/6/2015 3:10 PM Marriage Outlaws: Regulating Polygamy in America CASEY E. FAUCON* Polygamist families in America live as outlaws on the margins of society. While the insular groups living in and around Utah are recognized by mainstream society, Muslim polygamists (including African‐American polygamists) living primarily along the East Coast are much less familiar. Despite the positive social justifications that support polygamous marriage recognition, the practice remains taboo in the eyes of the law. Second and third polygamous wives are left without any legal recognition or protection. Some legal scholars argue that states should recognize and regulate polygamous marriage, specifically by borrowing from business entity models to draft default rules that strive for equal bargaining power and contract‐based, negotiated rights. Any regulatory proposal, however, must both fashion rules that are applicable to an American legal system, and attract religious polygamists to regulation by focusing on the religious impetus and social concerns behind polygamous marriage practices. This Article sets out a substantive and procedural process to regulate religious polygamous marriages. This proposal addresses concerns about equality and also reflects the religious and as‐practiced realities of polygamy in the United States. INTRODUCTION Up to 150,000 polygamists live in the United States as outlaws on the margins of society.1 Although every state prohibits and criminalizes polygamy,2 Copyright © 2014 by Casey E. Faucon. * Casey E. Faucon is the 2013‐2015 William H. Hastie Fellow at the University of Wisconsin Law School. J.D./D.C.L., LSU Paul M. Hebert School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights of the Museum of Zoology Highlights on the Blue Route
    Highlights of the Museum of Zoology Highlights on the Blue Route Ray-finned Fishes 1 The ray-finned fishes are the most diverse group of backboned animals alive today. From the air-breathing Polypterus with its bony scales to the inflated porcupine fish covered in spines; fish that hear by picking up sounds with the swim bladder and transferring them to the ear along a series of bones to the electrosense of mormyrids; the long fins of flying fish helping them to glide above the ocean surface to the amazing camouflage of the leafy seadragon… the range of adaptations seen in these animals is extraordinary. The origin of limbs 2 The work of Prof Jenny Clack (1947-2020) and her team here at the Museum has revolutionised our understanding of the origin of limbs in vertebrates. Her work on the Devonian tetrapods Acanthostega and Ichthyostega showed that they had eight fingers and seven toes respectively on their paddle-like limbs. These animals also had functional gills and other features that suggest that they were aquatic. More recent work on early Carboniferous sites is shedding light on early vertebrate life on land. LeatherbackTurtle, Dermochelys coriacea 3 Leatherbacks are the largest living turtles. They have a wide geographical range, but their numbers are falling. Eggs are laid on tropical beaches, and hatchlings must fend for themselves against many perils. Only around one in a thousand leatherback hatchlings reach adulthood. With such a low survival rate, the harvesting of turtle eggs has had a devastating impact on leatherback populations. Nile Crocodile, Crocodylus niloticus 4 This skeleton was collected by Dr Hugh Cott (1900- 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Importance of Dewlap Display in Male Mating Success in Free- Ranging Brown Anoles (Anolis Sagrei) Author(S): Richard R
    Importance of Dewlap Display in Male Mating Success in Free- Ranging Brown Anoles (Anolis sagrei) Author(s): Richard R. Tokarz, Ann V. Paterson, Stephen McMann Source: Journal of Herpetology, 39(1):174-177. 2005. Published By: The Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1670/0022-1511(2005)039[0174:IODDIM]2.0.CO;2 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/ full/10.1670/0022-1511%282005%29039%5B0174%3AIODDIM%5D2.0.CO %3B2 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/ terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. SHORTER COMMUNICATIONS Journal of Herpetology, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 174–177, 2005 Copyright 2005 Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Importance of Dewlap Display in Male Mating Success in Free-Ranging Brown Anoles (Anolis sagrei) 1,2 3,4 3,5 RICHARD R.
    [Show full text]
  • Mate Choice | Principles of Biology from Nature Education
    contents Principles of Biology 171 Mate Choice Reproduction underlies many animal behaviors. The greater sage grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus). Female sage grouse evaluate males as sexual partners on the basis of the feather ornaments and the males' elaborate displays. Stephen J. Krasemann/Science Source. Topics Covered in this Module Mating as a Risky Behavior Major Objectives of this Module Describe factors associated with specific patterns of mating and life history strategies of specific mating patterns. Describe how genetics contributes to behavioral phenotypes such as mating. Describe the selection factors influencing behaviors like mate choice. page 882 of 989 3 pages left in this module contents Principles of Biology 171 Mate Choice Mating as a Risky Behavior Different species have different mating patterns. Different species have evolved a range of mating behaviors that vary in the number of individuals involved and the length of time over which their relationships last. The most open type of relationship is promiscuity, in which all members of a community can mate with each other. Within a promiscuous species, an animal of either gender may mate with any other male or female. No permanent relationships develop between mates, and offspring cannot be certain of the identity of their fathers. Promiscuous behavior is common in bonobos (Pan paniscus), as well as their close relatives, the chimpanzee (P. troglodytes). Bonobos also engage in sexual activity for activities other than reproduction: to greet other members of the community, to release social tensions, and to resolve conflicts. Test Yourself How might promiscuous behavior provide an evolutionary advantage for males? Submit Some animals demonstrate polygamous relationships, in which a single individual of one gender mates with multiple individuals of the opposite gender.
    [Show full text]
  • L¿Amour for Four: Polygyny, Polyamory, and the State¿S Compelling Economic Interest in Normative Monogamy
    Emory Law Journal Volume 64 Issue 6 Paper Symposium — Polygamous Unions? Charting the Contours of Marriage Law's Frontier 2015 L¿Amour for Four: Polygyny, Polyamory, and the State¿s Compelling Economic Interest in Normative Monogamy Jonathan A. Porter Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/elj Recommended Citation Jonathan A. Porter, L¿Amour for Four: Polygyny, Polyamory, and the State¿s Compelling Economic Interest in Normative Monogamy, 64 Emory L. J. 2093 (2015). Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/elj/vol64/iss6/11 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Emory Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Emory Law Journal by an authorized editor of Emory Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PORTER GALLEYSPROOFS 5/19/2015 2:36 PM L’AMOUR FOR FOUR: POLYGYNY, POLYAMORY, AND THE STATE’S COMPELLING ECONOMIC INTEREST IN NORMATIVE MONOGAMY ABSTRACT Some Americans are changing the way they pair up, but others aren’t satisfied with pairs. In the last few years, while voters, legislatures, and judiciaries have expanded marriage in favor of same-sex couples, some are hoping for expansion in a different dimension. These Americans, instead of concerning themselves with gender restrictions, want to remove numerical restrictions on marriage currently imposed by states. These people call themselves polyamorists, and they are seeking rights for their multiple-partner relationships. Of course, polygamy is nothing new for the human species. Some scientists believe that polygamy is actually the most natural human relationship, and history is littered with a variety of approaches to polygamous relations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Body Size on Sexual Dimorphism
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-2017 The Influence of Body Size on Sexual Dimorphism Haley Elizabeth Horbaly University of Tennessee, Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Biological and Physical Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Horbaly, Haley Elizabeth, "The Influence of Body Size on Sexual Dimorphism. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2017. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/4970 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Haley Elizabeth Horbaly entitled "The Influence of Body Size on Sexual Dimorphism." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Dawnie W. Steadman, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Benjamin M. Auerbach, Michael W. Kenyhercz Accepted for the Council: Dixie L. Thompson Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) The Influence of Body Size on Sexual Dimorphism A Thesis Presented for the Master of Arts Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Haley Elizabeth Horbaly December 2017 Copyright © 2017 by Haley Elizabeth Horbaly All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoology Lab Manual
    General Zoology Lab Supplement Stephen W. Ziser Department of Biology Pinnacle Campus To Accompany the Zoology Lab Manual: Smith, D. G. & M. P. Schenk Exploring Zoology: A Laboratory Guide. Morton Publishing Co. for BIOL 1413 General Zoology 2017.5 Biology 1413 Introductory Zoology – Supplement to Lab Manual; Ziser 2015.12 1 General Zoology Laboratory Exercises 1. Orientation, Lab Safety, Animal Collection . 3 2. Lab Skills & Microscopy . 14 3. Animal Cells & Tissues . 15 4. Animal Organs & Organ Systems . 17 5. Animal Reproduction . 25 6. Animal Development . 27 7. Some Animal-Like Protists . 31 8. The Animal Kingdom . 33 9. Phylum Porifera (Sponges) . 47 10. Phyla Cnidaria (Jellyfish & Corals) & Ctenophora . 49 11. Phylum Platyhelminthes (Flatworms) . 52 12. Phylum Nematoda (Roundworms) . 56 13. Phyla Rotifera . 59 14. Acanthocephala, Gastrotricha & Nematomorpha . 60 15. Phylum Mollusca (Molluscs) . 67 16. Phyla Brachiopoda & Ectoprocta . 73 17. Phylum Annelida (Segmented Worms) . 74 18. Phyla Sipuncula . 78 19. Phylum Arthropoda (I): Trilobita, Myriopoda . 79 20. Phylum Arthropoda (II): Chelicerata . 81 21. Phylum Arthropods (III): Crustacea . 86 22. Phylum Arthropods (IV): Hexapoda . 90 23. Phyla Onycophora & Tardigrada . 97 24. Phylum Echinodermata (Echinoderms) . .104 25. Phyla Chaetognatha & Hemichordata . 108 26. Phylum Chordata (I): Lower Chordates & Agnatha . 109 27. Phylum Chordata (II): Chondrichthyes & Osteichthyes . 112 28. Phylum Chordata (III): Amphibia . 115 29. Phylum Chordata (IV): Reptilia . 118 30. Phylum Chordata (V): Aves . 121 31. Phylum Chordata (VI): Mammalia . 124 Lab Reports & Assignments Identifying Animal Phyla . 39 Identifying Common Freshwater Invertebrates . 42 Lab Report for Practical #1 . 43 Lab Report for Practical #2 . 62 Identification of Insect Orders . 96 Lab Report for Practical #3 .
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Selection and Mate Choice
    Review TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution Vol.21 No.6 June 2006 Sexual selection and mate choice Malte Andersson1 and Leigh W. Simmons2 1Department of Zoology, University of Gothenburg, SE 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden 2Centre for Evolutionary Biology, School of Animal Biology (M092), The University of Western Australia, Crawley 6009, WA, Australia The past two decades have seen extensive growth of characterization of genes and their effects, from DNA sexual selection research. Theoretical and empirical sequences via protein to phenotypic expression at the level work has clarified many components of pre- and of the individual, with possible consequences at the postcopulatory sexual selection, such as aggressive population level and above. competition, mate choice, sperm utilization and sexual conflict. Genetic mechanisms of mate choice evolution Evolution of mate choice have been less amenable to empirical testing, but Although mate choice occurs in males and females [4], for molecular genetic analyses can now be used for incisive convenience we refer here to female choice of male traits. experimentation. Here, we highlight some of the As experimental evidence accumulated, mate choice currently debated areas in pre- and postcopulatory became widely recognized, but the genetic mechanisms sexual selection. We identify where new techniques underlying its evolution remain the subject of debate can help estimate the relative roles of the various (Box 1). Showing how mating preferences evolve geneti- selection mechanisms that might work together in the cally is harder than showing that they exist, and the evolution of mating preferences and attractive traits, problem is aggravated by the possibility that several and in sperm–egg interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Marriage Systems
    Evolution of marriage systems Laura Fortunato Institute of Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology University of Oxford 64 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6PN, UK [email protected] +44 (0)1865 284971 Santa Fe Institute 1399 Hyde Park Road Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA Published as: Fortunato, L. (2015) Evolution of marriage systems. In Wright, J. D. (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., vol. 14, pp. 611{619. Oxford: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.81059-4. 1 Contents 1 Definition of the subject 4 2 Key concepts 5 2.1 What is marriage? . .5 2.2 Classification of marriage systems . .6 2.3 Marriage, mating, and reproduction . .8 3 Evolutionary perspectives on marriage systems 10 3.1 Polygyny as the \default" mating and marriage system . 11 3.2 Polygynous marriage as resource defense polygyny . 13 3.3 The polygyny threshold model, female choice, and male coercion . 14 3.4 Monogamous marriage as socially imposed monogamy . 16 3.5 Monogamous marriage as \monogamous inheritance" . 18 3.6 Polyandrous marriage as a response to ecological challenges . 20 4 Concluding remarks 22 References 23 2 Abstract A marriage system is the set of rules and norms that regulate reproduction in a given human society. This article provides an overview of key concepts and general themes in the study of their evolution. The focus is on the number of spouses allowed (i.e. whether marriage is monogamous or polygamous), and the social and ecological factors associated with this aspect of the marriage system. Keywords marriage, kinship, family, inheritance, monogamy, polyandry, polygyny, polygamy, evolution of human social behaviour, human reproduction Cross-references Evolution of human mate choice, Evolution of kinship 3 1 Definition of the subject A marriage system is the set of rules and norms that regulate reproduction in a given human society.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Behaviour of Rams:Male Orientation and Its Endocrine Correlates
    JournalofReproductionandFertilitySupplement54, 259-269 Sexual behaviour of rams:male orientation and its endocrine correlates J. A. Resko1, A. Perkins2, C. E. Roselli1, J. N. Stellflug3 and F. K. Stormshak4 'Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR 97201-3098, USA; 'Department of Psychology, Carroll College,Helena, MAO 59625, USA; 'US Sheep Experimentation Station, Dubois, ID 83425, USA; and 4Department of Animal Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-6702, USA The components of heterosexual behaviour in rams are reviewed as a basis for understanding partner preference behaviour. A small percentage of rams will not mate with oestrous females and if given a choice will display courtship behaviour towards another ram in preference to a female. Some of the endocrine profiles of these male- oriented rams differ from those of heterosexual controls. These differences include reduced serum concentrations of testosterone, oestradiol and oestrone, reduced capacity to produce testosterone in vitro, and reduced capacity to aromatize androgens in the preoptic-anterior hypothalamus of the brain. Our observation that aromatase activity is significantly lower in the preoptic-anterior hypothalamic area of male-oriented rams than in female-oriented rams may indicate an important neurochemical link to sexual behaviour that should be investigated. The defect in steroid hormone production by the adult testes of the male-oriented ram may represent a defect that can be traced
    [Show full text]
  • Dodos and Birds of Paradise
    ISLANDS AND THEIR LESSONS IN BIODIVERSITYi -Jack R. Holt ISLAND OF THE DODO The extinction of the dodo is representative of modernity in several ways, not the least of which is that the event occurred on a small island. -David Quammen (1996) When I was in London five years ago I had one day to stay in the city before our plane left for New York. With all of London to choose from, what does one do in one day? Well, for me there was no question. I had to go to the British Museum of Natural History. The main attraction was its collection of dinosaurs. I walked throughout the museum, and then paused at a display of animals that had become extinct during historic times. There was a stuffed Passenger Pigeon, birds once so numerous in North America that their flocks blackened the sky as they flew over. Nearby, there was a Dodo, another pigeon. This animal was large. In fact everything about this bird was large except its wings. Its skeleton indicated that the Dodo was flightless. Not only were its wings short, but its breast bone was too small to support flight muscles. Clearly, it could not fly, and its reconstruction made it look even more comical with a bald face and a body covered with fluffy down-like feathers (see Figure 1). Portuguese sailors discovered the Dodo's Island in 1510. The island, a small point of land in the Indian Ocean east of Madagascar, became known as Mauritius. The earliest record of the Dodo was in 1598.
    [Show full text]
  • Polyrhythmic Foraging and Competitive Coexistence Akihiko Mougi
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Polyrhythmic foraging and competitive coexistence Akihiko Mougi The current ecological understanding still does not fully explain how biodiversity is maintained. One strategy to address this issue is to contrast theoretical prediction with real competitive communities where diverse species share limited resources. I present, in this study, a new competitive coexistence theory-diversity of biological rhythms. I show that diversity in activity cycles plays a key role in coexistence of competing species, using a two predator-one prey system with diel, monthly, and annual cycles for predator foraging. Competitive exclusion always occurs without activity cycles. Activity cycles do, however, allow for coexistence. Furthermore, each activity cycle plays a diferent role in coexistence, and coupling of activity cycles can synergistically broaden the coexistence region. Thus, with all activity cycles, the coexistence region is maximal. The present results suggest that polyrhythmic changes in biological activity in response to the earth’s rotation and revolution are key to competitive coexistence. Also, temporal niche shifts caused by environmental changes can easily eliminate competitive coexistence. Diverse species that coexist in an ecological community are supported by fewer shared limited resources than expected, contrary to theory1. A simple mathematical theory predicts that, at equilibrium, the number of sym- patric species competing for a shared set of limited resources is less than the quantity of resources or prey species2–4. Tis apparent paradox leads ecologists to examine mechanisms that allow competitors to coexist and has produced diverse coexistence theory5–7. Non-equilibrium dynamics is considered as a major driver to prevent interacting species from going into equilibrium and violate the competitive exclusion principle 8,9.
    [Show full text]