DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents NASA Presidential Transition Binder Executive Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents NASA Presidential Transition Binder Executive Summary The NASA Presidential Transition Binder Table of Contents NASA Presidential Transition Binder Executive Summary ....................................................10 1.0 The Space Act, Relevant Space Policies, and Other Applicable Laws .........................13 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 13 1.1 Policies .......................................................................................................................... 13 1.1.1 U.S. National Space Policy – June 28, 2010 .................................................................... 14 1.1.2 U.S. Space Transportation Policy – December 21, 2004 .................................................. 15 1.1.3 National Aeronautics Research and Development Policy – December 20, 2006 .............. 15 1.1.4 U.S. Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Policy – December 8, 2004 ...... 15 1.1.5 U.S. Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy – April 25, 2003 .................................. 16 1.2 Other Applicable Laws ................................................................................................. 16 1.2.1 The Environment ............................................................................................................... 16 1.2.2 Ethics/Standards of Conduct ............................................................................................. 17 1.2.3 Personnel ........................................................................................................................... 18 1.2.4 International Law and Cooperation ................................................................................... 19 1.2.5 Export Control ................................................................................................................... 19 1.2.6 Inventions/Patents ............................................................................................................. 20 1.2.7 Patent Licensing ................................................................................................................ 21 1.2.8 Trademarks ........................................................................................................................ 22 1.2.9 Procurement Contracts, Grants and Cooperative Agreements .......................................... 23 1.2.10 Commercialization of Space Activities ............................................................................. 23 2.0 NASA 2011 Strategic Plan Summary ..............................................................................27 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 27 2.1 Background ................................................................................................................... 27 2.2 2011 Strategic Plan ....................................................................................................... 27 2.3 NASA’s Vision, Mission, and Values .......................................................................... 27 2.4 NASA’s Strategic Goals ............................................................................................... 28 2.5 New Law and Policy ..................................................................................................... 29 2.6 Implementing the 2011 Strategic Plan .......................................................................... 29 2.7 2014 Strategic Plan Development ................................................................................. 29 3.0 NASA Governance and Strategic Management .............................................................31 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 31 3.1 Organizational Balance ................................................................................................. 32 3.2 Programmatic and Institutional Checks and Balances .................................................. 34 3.3 Roles and Separation of Authorities ............................................................................. 34 3.3.1 Programmatic Authority .................................................................................................... 35 3.3.2 Institutional—Technical Authority ................................................................................... 35 3.3.3 Institutional—Mission Support Authority ......................................................................... 35 3.4 Authority Roles Regarding Risk ................................................................................... 36 3.5 Process-Related Checks and Balances .......................................................................... 36 3.5.1 Independent Life-Cycle Review Process ........................................................................... 36 3.5.2 Requirements Tailoring Process ........................................................................................ 37 3.5.3 Dissenting Opinion Process ............................................................................................... 37 3.6 Authority and Accountability ....................................................................................... 38 3.7 Agency Management Councils ..................................................................................... 38 4.0 NASA Organization and Roles ........................................................................................40 • 1 • The NASA Presidential Transition Binder Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 40 4.1 Overview of the NASA Organization ........................................................................... 40 4.1.1 NASA Office of the Administrator ................................................................................... 41 4.1.2 Administrator .................................................................................................................... 42 4.1.3 Deputy Administrator ........................................................................................................ 44 4.1.4 Associate Administrator .................................................................................................... 46 4.1.5 Chief of Staff ..................................................................................................................... 48 4.1.6 Associate Deputy Administrator ....................................................................................... 50 4.1.7 Associate Deputy Administrator for Strategy and Policy ................................................. 51 4.1.8 Assistant Associate Administrator .................................................................................... 53 4.1.9 Director, Office of Evaluation ........................................................................................... 54 4.2 Office of Inspector General (OIG) ................................................................................ 55 4.3 Staff Offices .................................................................................................................. 60 4.3.1 Office of the Chief Financial Officer(OCFO) ................................................................... 61 4.3.2 Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO) ............................................................... 68 4.3.3 Office of the Chief Scientist (OCS) .................................................................................. 76 4.3.4 Office of the Chief Technologist (OCT) ........................................................................... 80 4.3.5 Office of the Chief Engineer (OCE) .................................................................................. 83 4.3.6 Office of the Chief Health And Medical Officer (OCHMO) ............................................ 88 4.3.7 Office of Safety and Mission Assurance ........................................................................... 91 4.3.8 Office of Diversity and Equal Opportunity (ODEO) ........................................................ 97 4.3.9 Office of Education ......................................................................................................... 101 4.3.10 Office of International and Interagency Relations (OIIR)............................................... 105 4.3.11 Office of the General Counsel (OGC) ............................................................................. 110 4.3.12 Office of Legislative & Intergovernmental Affairs (OLIA) ............................................ 113 4.3.13 Office of Communications .............................................................................................. 116 4.3.14 Office of Small Business Programs (OSBP) ................................................................... 121 4.4 Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate ................................................................. 123 4.5 Human Exploration & Operations Mission Directorate (HEOMD) ........................... 130 4.6 Science Mission Directorate ....................................................................................... 138 4.7 Space Technology Mission Directorate ...................................................................... 153 4.8 Mission Support Directorate ......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2006 Spinoff Spinoff 2006 Innovative Partnerships Program
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration 2006 f spinof Spinoff 2006 Innovative Partnerships Program Developed by Publications and Graphics Department NASA Center for AeroSpace Information (CASI) Early in the next decade, the new Crew Exploration Vehicle will begin to ferry crew and supplies to the International Space Station. Cutting-edge technology like this National Aeronautics and leads the way for development of new Space Administration spinoff products that benefit life on Earth. Table of Contents 3 Foreword Environmental and Agricultural Resources 4 Introduction PRP: The Proven Solution for Cleaning Up Oil Spills .............................62 5 Partnership Benefits Progressive Plant Growing Has Business Blooming ..................................64 FLIPPER: Validation for Remote Ocean Imaging ....................................68 Health and Medicine Paper-Thin Plastic Film Soaks Up Sun to Create Solar Energy ................70 Ingestible Thermometer Pill Aids Athletes in Beating the Heat ................6 Saving Space and Time: The Tractor That Einstein Built.........................74 Space-Proven Medical Monitor: The Total Patient-Care Package ............10 Computer Technology From Planetary Imaging to Enzyme Screening .........................................12 A Predictive Approach to Eliminating Errors in Software Code ................76 Transportation Scheduling Software for Complex Scenarios .............................................78 Damage-Tolerant Fan Casings for Jet Engines .........................................14
    [Show full text]
  • News & Notes, Third Quarter 2016
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Volume 33, Number 3 Third Quarter 2016 FROM IF YOU GIVE A NASA HISTORY INTERN THE CHIEF SOME APPLE JUICE HISTORIAN By Cat Baldwin and Chris Rudeen n last quarter’s issue, II made some fairly s the NASA History summer interns, IN THIS ISSUE: pointed comments on Athere’s a special place in our hearts for decisions being made the Smithsonian National Air and Space From the Chief Historian regarding the history Museum (NASM). We have dragged many 1 office at Johnson Space Center (JSC). As I people into the Apollo exhibit, stopping 1 If You Give a NASA History Intern write this, the situation is still in flux, but I am them at every artifact along the way and Some Apple Juice considerably more inclined to expect a positive telling stories over their loud complaints. 5 News from Headquarters and the outcome. This is in part due to my impressions “That’s the lunar ranging retroreflector! Centers from some very frank discussions between It’s a mirror on the Moon and they shoot senior officials at JSC and Headquarters. It is lasers at it. How cool is that?” “Yes, that’s 11 Other Aerospace History News clear from those discussions that JSC leader- duct tape on that bumper. Gene Cernan 14 Recent Publications and Online ship has a strong commitment to an effective literally had to duct-tape the bumper back Resources history program. However, it was equally clear on the LRV [lunar roving vehicle]. Gene 21 Upcoming Meetings that JSC is feeling the squeeze in their Center Cernan is an artist.” Our friends don’t Management and Operations (CMO) budget.
    [Show full text]
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Planetary Science Subcommittee of the NASA Advisory Council
    NAC Planetary Science Subcommittee, January 26-27, 2011 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Planetary Science Subcommittee of the NASA Advisory Council January 26-27, 2011 NASA Headquarters Washington, D.C. Meeting Minutes ____________________ ____________________ Jonathan Rall Ronald Greeley Executive Secretary Chair, Planetary Science Subcommittee 1 NAC Planetary Science Subcommittee, January 26-27, 2011 Table of Contents Welcome 3 NAC Science Committee Review of Analysis Groups 3 NLS II Update 3 Mars Exploration Program 4 Status of EJSM 5 Planetary Science Division Status 6 MESSENGER: Options for an EM 8 Q&A period with SMD AA 9 CAPTEM 10 LEAG 11 MEPAG 11 OPAG 12 VExAG 13 Discussion 14 NASA Chief Scientist Introduction 14 SBAG 15 SR&T 16 Draft report discussion 18 Technology Review Panel 19 Discussion and wrap-up 21 Appendix A- Agenda Appendix B- Membership Appendix C- Attendees Appendix D- List of Presentations Meeting report prepared by: Joan M. Zimmermann, Zantech IT 2 NAC Planetary Science Subcommittee, January 26-27, 2011 January 26, 2011 Welcome Dr. Ronald Greeley, Chair of the Planetary Science Subcommittee (PSS) opened the meeting. Members introduced themselves and agenda items were briefly reviewed. Dr. Greeley acknowledged members who would be cycling off the subcommittee by March 1, 2011; these were Drs. Cravens, Herzog, Johnson, and Slavin. Dr. James Green, Director of the Planetary Science Division (PSD) added his commentary, noting that this would be a critical meeting as Congress debates budget particulars that will undoubtedly impact the division. He added that he wished to ensure that PSD continue to perform top science tasks with guidance from PSS.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Layout 071013
    3RD annual GULF COAST AEROSPACE CORRIDOR Louisiana Mississippi Alabama Florida 2013-2014 June 2013 Gulf Coast Aerospace Corridor 2013-2014 – 1 Researched, written and prepared by the Gulf Coast Reporters’ League, an independent team of current and former journalists. Support for this project was provided by our underwriters. Findings detailed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect views of the organizations or agencies that appear in this publication or provide support. This book is available as a free PDF download. Printed versions and an eBook edition are available from Lulu.com, a print-on-demand service based in Raleigh, N.C. All rights reserved. Cover photos, clockwise from upper left: U.S. Navy Triton unmanned surveillance aircraft flying over the clouds (Northrop Grumman illustration); U.S. Air Force F-35 Joint Strike Fighters flying in formation (U.S. Air Force photo); portion of the popular Airbus A320 (Airbus photo); NASA’s Space Launch System taking off from the launch pad (NASA illustration). Version 3, 07/10/2013 Copyright © 2013-2014 by Tortorano Commissioned Publications/Gulf Coast Reporters’ League Gulf Coast Aerospace Corridor 2013-2014 – 2 Acknowledgements The Gulf Coast Reporters’ League and Okaloosa STEMM Center of Valparaiso, Fla., would like to thank Quint & Rishy Studer of Pensacola, Fla., for providing printed copies of this book to teachers with aviation-related courses in Okaloosa County, Fla. Support for the research, writing and compilation of this aerospace report was provided
    [Show full text]
  • The Goddard Memorial Mrs
    March 2004 Issue 3 Vol 1 NASA Remembers Columbia Crew with Dedications By Dewayne Washington Photo by Bill Ingalls/NASA On February 2, Remembering Columbia ... Page 1 NASA paused to Women History ................ Page 2 commemorate and honor lives lost in the Columbia Supporters ........ Page 3 continuing efforts of space exploration. A What Turns Hurricanes Into memorial to the Monsters .......................... Page 4 fallen heroes of Can We Talk? ................... Page 4 Space Shuttle Columbia was Why Go? ......................... Page 5 unveiled during a ceremony early in the Explorer Schools Visits ..... Page 7 day at Arlington Blind Can Reach ............... Page 8 National Cemetery. Family members of The Goddard Memorial Mrs. Sandy Anderson, wife of Columbia astronaut Michael Anderson, the STS-107crew Symposium ...................... Page 9 looks at the memorial along with astronauts Steve Robinson (right) were the first to see and Carlos Noriega (left). another permanent Goddard in the News ....... Page 9 marker of the dangers of space flight. The new memorial is just a few feet from one Black History Activities .. Page 10 honoring the crew of Space Shuttle Challenger, lost on January 28, 1986. Employee Spotlight ........ Page 11 In his remarks, Administrator O’Keefe stated that future visitors to the site will learn that these space heroes came from all parts of the United States and from the lands Goddard Meet CFC Goal .. Page 12 of India and Israel. “They were pilots, engineers and scientists, all motivated by a fire Gay/Straight Alliance ..... Page 12 within, a passionate eternal flame within each of their souls that compelled them to live lives of distinction, and to bring the heavens ever closer to our grasp.” Movie Days ....................
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring How the Outer Space Treaty Will Impact American Commerce and Settlement in Space
    S. HRG. 115–219 REOPENING THE AMERICAN FRONTIER: EXPLORING HOW THE OUTER SPACE TREATY WILL IMPACT AMERICAN COMMERCE AND SETTLEMENT IN SPACE HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON SPACE, SCIENCE, AND COMPETITIVENESS OF THE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MAY 23, 2017 Printed for the use of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation ( Available online: http://www.govinfo.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 29–998 PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 10:53 May 15, 2018 Jkt 075679 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\GPO\DOCS\29998.TXT JACKIE SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JOHN THUNE, South Dakota, Chairman ROGER F. WICKER, Mississippi BILL NELSON, Florida, Ranking ROY BLUNT, Missouri MARIA CANTWELL, Washington TED CRUZ, Texas AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota DEB FISCHER, Nebraska RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, Connecticut JERRY MORAN, Kansas BRIAN SCHATZ, Hawaii DAN SULLIVAN, Alaska EDWARD MARKEY, Massachusetts DEAN HELLER, Nevada CORY BOOKER, New Jersey JAMES INHOFE, Oklahoma TOM UDALL, New Mexico MIKE LEE, Utah GARY PETERS, Michigan RON JOHNSON, Wisconsin TAMMY BALDWIN, Wisconsin SHELLEY MOORE CAPITO, West Virginia TAMMY DUCKWORTH, Illinois CORY GARDNER, Colorado
    [Show full text]
  • View NASA As Adrift
    A SpacePolicyOnline.Com Hearing Summary Confirmation of Charles Bolden and Lori Garver to be Administrator and Deputy Administrator of NASA Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee July 8, 2009 Chair: Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) Ranking Member: Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX) Witnesses Maj. Gen. Charles Bolden (USMC, Ret.), nominee for Administrator (prepared statement) Ms. Lori Garver, nominee for Deputy Administrator (prepared statement) Background NASA has had an Acting Administrator, Christopher Scolese, since the resignation of Michael Griffin on January 20, 2009 with the change in administrations. The Deputy Administrator position has been vacant since January also, when Shana Dale resigned. Gen. Bolden and Ms. Garver were nominated by President Obama to be Administrator and Deputy Administrator on May 23, 2009. Gen. Bolden is a former NASA astronaut who flew on a space shuttle mission with now-Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL) who was a congressman from Florida at the time. Ms. Garver has a broad background in space – from representing grass roots space enthusiasts as executive director of the National Space Society, to serving at NASA at Associate Administrator for Policy during the tenure of Administrator Dan Goldin, to representing private sector space efforts as a consultant for the past eight years. She competed with singer Lance Bass to become a “space tourist” on a Russian Soyuz spacecraft in the early 2000’s, but neither was able to raise the requisite funding. She was a key adviser to the Hillary Clinton campaign on space issues, and moved to the Obama campaign after he won the Democratic nomination. A webcast of the hearing is available here.
    [Show full text]
  • H M 7 P a G E 1 a MEMORIAL HONORING the MEMORY OF
    H A MEMORIAL M HONORING THE MEMORY OF THE SEVEN ASTRONAUTS WHO SERVED ON THE 7 P SPACE SHUTTLE COLUMBIA. a g e WHEREAS, the members of this chamber are grief-stricken at the loss of the 1 space shuttle Columbia and her seven astronauts on Saturday, February 1, 2003; and WHEREAS, the women and men who perished aboard Columbia embodied the very best qualities of mankind. Their intelligence, diligence and valor led to their selection for the space program and their presence on Columbia; and WHEREAS, today we pause not only to remember this tragedy, but we also pause to honor the achievements of seven exemplary people; and WHEREAS, let us recite the names of the seven astronauts: Rick D. Husband, age forty-five and the commander of Columbia. Commander Husband was a colonel in the United States air force. He was selected as an astronaut in 1994 and prior to this mission had logged two hundred thirty hours in space. His home was Amarillo, Texas; William C. McCool, age forty-one and the pilot for the mission. He was a commander in the United States navy and a former test pilot. Commander McCool became an astronaut in 1996, and this was his first space flight. His home was Lubbock, Texas; Michael P. Anderson, age forty-three and the payload commander for Columbia. Lieutenant Colonel Anderson was an air force man who grew up as the son of an air force man. Selected as an astronaut in 1994, he had previously logged over two hundred eleven hours in space.
    [Show full text]
  • Roundup Fall 2015
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Roundup LYNDON B. JOHNSON SPACE CENTER Fall | 2015 Global (and cosmic) expansion Expansión global (y cósmica) In this edition… Guest Column 3 ISS Science Corner 4 Veteran explorers slated for future commercial crew flights 5 All aboard the education I’M WRITING THIS COLUMN having only been on the job for about two station! weeks, so I’m still learning the duties of a deputy director. While I have 6 White House lands at the been to the ninth floor of Building 1 many times, it is interesting how I house of human spaceflight have begun to see the center differently as I take on this new role. to praise our Commitment to I was the Orion Program manager for nearly eight years. During that Action for Hispanic education time, I experienced many transitions in NASA leadership and policy. 8 ‘Leaf’ it to NASA to grow Some of these were difficult for the team to weather, but they met the lettuce on space station challenge. I believe these experiences taught me how to anticipate, adapt and lead a team through change. It is my hope that these 9 It’s complicated: New Pluto experiences will provide me the insight to help Ellen lead the center images from NASA’s New into NASA’s next chapters of human spaceflight. Horizons offer many surprises I know that the other programs and directorates at JSC are faced 10 Meet Delene Sedillo, with their own specific, dynamic environments. In the coming weeks, NASA/PHOTO Associate Director, Office of I’ll be taking some time to get an understanding of the strategies and Mark Geyer Procurement challenges involving all of the organizations here at JSC.
    [Show full text]
  • Lori Garver, NASA Deputy Administrator SOFIA Joining Forces Event Joint Base Andrews September 22, 2011
    Lori Garver, NASA Deputy Administrator SOFIA Joining Forces Event Joint Base Andrews September 22, 2011 Good afternoon. My name is Lori Garver, Deputy Administrator at NASA. I want to thank our German Aerospace Center partners and Joint Base Andrews for organizing this event and especially for making it possible for students and the children of military families to see this unique flying observatory up close. And let me just take a moment to commend First Lady Michelle Obama and Jill Biden for devoting their time and energy in encouraging all Americans to do more in support of the wives, husbands, sons, daughters and other family members of our men and women in uniform who are defending our freedom around the world. 1 I want to also welcome any and all Members of Congress who are here today. And a special hello to Mary Blessing, an astronomy teacher at Herndon High School -- one of only six American teachers selected to work with scientists aboard SOFIA and to share that experience with their students. I know you are all eager to tour this magnificent aircraft, so I am only going to speak briefly then turn it over to my colleagues, Paul Hertz, NASA’s Chief Scientist in our Science Mission Directorate; and Leland Melvin, our Associate Administrator for Education and a former astronaut. Paul and Leland will speak more about the amazing scientific and educational value of SOFIA, but let me just tell you that this project is a key component of NASA’s science objectives. 2 It will help us zoom in close on some of the most fundamental questions of the universe: Where did we come from? How was our solar system formed? And what else is out there? It is fitting that SOFIA means “wisdom” in Greek.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role and Position of Information Technology in Strategic Buyer-Supplier Relationships
    THE ROLE AND POSITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN STRATEGIC BUYER-SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS Competitive Paper Abstract One driver for the emergence of a network society comprises the exponential rise of the ubiquity and reach of information technology (IT) that enables effective value co-creation between organizations. Despite the importance of IT in inter-organizational relationships, the major part of the extant research has presented one sided and partial approaches to the topic. For this reason, the current article adopts a holistic qualitative case study approach in aiming to define how IT posits to the various elements of the strategic buyer-supplier relationship. This study provides a conceptual and empirical based analysis, defines the role and position of IT regarding the defined three layers of a relationship, and discusses the implications for theory and practice. The study prepare the ground for further qualitative and quantitative research in order to enhance a holistic understanding of IT in relation to the various structures and processes in organizational and inter-organizational contexts. Keywords: inter-organizational information systems, information technology, business relationships, business networks, qualitative case study 1 The role and position of information technology in strategic buyer-supplier relationships 1. INTRODUCTION The business operating environment has become increasingly complex over recent decades. Instead of single transactions, most inter-organizational exchanges are enacted within inter-organizational relationships, nets and networks (e.g., Coviello et al., 2002; Möller & Rajala, 2007; Powell, 1990). Companies are embedded in these complex and dynamic constellations that steer resource integration and value creation activities, and thus have a fundamental impact on various levels of society as a whole (e.g., Castells, 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • A Software Package to Support Mission Analysis and Orbital Mechanics Calculations
    A Software Package to Support Mission Analysis and Orbital Mechanics Calculations Jorge Tiago Melo Barbosa da Silva e Vila Thesis to obtain the Master of Science Degree in Aerospace Engineering Supervisor: Prof. Paulo Jorge Soares Gil Examination Committee Chairperson: Prof. João Manuel Lage de Miranda Lemos Supervisor: Prof. Paulo Jorge Soares Gil Members of the Committee: Prof. Bertinho Manuel D'Andrade da Costa July of 2015 Dedicated to the loving memory of my grandfather Joaquim Barbosa, whom I shall always remember. Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor Prof. Paulo Gil for the ideas, remarks, comments, and many engaging conversations which not only saw me through the learning process of this thesis, but also helped me personally. I want to thank Dr. Carlos del Burgo Díaz for the confidence shown in future applications of the software and the help provided with the star map alignment. I want to acknowledge Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz, from the Open Source Observatory and Repository, for his legal opinions regarding the EUPL licensing. Furthermore, I want to thank Pavel Holoborodko for the excellent MPFR C++ interface class and the professionalism, sympathy, and cooperation displayed while resolving licensing issues. I would also like to thank my parents for the care and interest shown throughout the years in my education, and for the support given in pursuing the interests which led me here. Lastly, I want to express my deepest gratitude to Ana Morais for the love, patience, and continuous support during the development of this thesis. Without you none of this would have been possible.
    [Show full text]