Climate Risk Disclosure Barometer Study Belgium 2020 Content
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
How are your climate change disclosures revealing the true risks and opportunities of your business? Climate Risk Disclosure Barometer Study Belgium 2020 Content 03 About this report 04 Methodology 06 Key findings 08 Observations and recommendations 10 Banks and Asset Managers 12 Food and beverage products 14 Health, retail and consumer goods 16 Holdings 18 Insurance 20 Manufacturing 22 Real estate 24 Technology 26 Telecom and services 28 Transport 30 Climate reporting versus non-financial reporting 32 What’s next? 33 Who we are About this report The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released a report in 2018 on the impacts of global warning of 1.5˚C and the emission pathways to achieve this goal. The results of the report are putting pressure on policy makers for more ambitious carbon policies, increasing the needs for investors to assess the impact on their investment portfolios and raising the awareness amongst business and consumers about climate change. Companies need to understand the physical impacts of climate change and the risks associated with the necessary transitioning to a low carbon economy. Companies are also confronted with increased expectations of investors and other stakeholders to make better analyses and disclosures on their resilience to climate risks. The report assesses the state of play of Belgian companies of the level to which they incorporate climate change in their business strategy through their publicly available reporting. In line with the 2019 EY Global Climate Risk Disclosure Barometer we are using the TCFD recommendations as a framework to assess the quality of the disclosures. In 2017, the industry-led Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), set up by the financial stability board (FSB), finalized its recommendations on financial climate risk disclosures. They aim to improve investor’s and corporates’ understanding of the impact of climate risks and to reduce the risk of a systemic financial shock to the economy due to climate change. The TCFD recommendations provide companies with a comprehensive framework to systematically report the impact of climate risks and opportunities. This report provides insights in the uptake of the TCFD recommendations across a selection of 56 companies in Belgium, both listed and non-listed, across 10 different sectors. The purpose of this report is to help companies understand the current state of climate reporting and to indicate areas for improvement across the different sectors. Methodology The scoring methodology is taken Monitoring and reporting are from the 2019 EY Global Climate Risk elements to driving corporate Disclosure Barometer, which examines action, but we are well aware that the public disclosures of over 950 not all information is disclosed by companies across a range of sectors in companies. Therefore, the desk 34 countries, including Belgium. research has been complemented by in-depth interviews with 25 The findings of the EY Belgium’s study companies in the scope of the study. are based on disclosures in publicly The dialogue provided us with available information, including valuable background information, annual reports, sustainability reports which we have integrated in the or the company’s website for the report, for example by the use of 2019 reporting period. When publicly quotes. available, a company’s disclosure concerning the CDP was also assessed. Due to fact that 2019 CDP reporting is not available yet, our study is based on Areas of the TCFD the 2018 reporting period. recommendations Metrics The TCFD recommendations are and structured around four thematic Targets areas that reflect how companies t operate: governance, strategy, R n is e risk management and metrics and k Managem targets. Strategy Governance TCFD thematic areas TCFD recommended disclosures Governance The organization’s governance around climate-related a. Board oversight risks and opportunities b. Management’s role Strategy The actual and potential impacts of climate-related a. Climate-related risks and opportunities risks, and opportunities on the organization’s b. Impact on the organization’s businesses, strategy, and businesses, strategy and financial planning financial planning c. Resilience of the organization’s strategy Risk Management The processes used by the organization to identify, a. Risk identification & assessment processes assess and manage climate-related risks b. Risk management process c. Integration into overall risk management Metrics & Targets The metrics and targets used to assess and mange a. Climate-related metrics in line with strategy and risk relevant climate-related risks and opportunities management process b. Scope 1, 2, 3 GHG metrics and the related risks c. Climate-related targets and performance against targets 4 | Belgium Climate Risk Disclosure Barometer Study The TCFD recommendations define The rating was expressed as a The selection consists of: climate impacts in two distinct percentage of the maximum score categories: should the company implement all • The BEL 20 11 TCFD recommendations. A score • 13 other listed companies (mostly • Transition impacts reflect the risks of 100% indicates that the company BEL Mid) to reach a balance in listed and opportunities associated with adopted all the recommendations and companies in every sector. changes in the economy, including the quality of the disclosure met all the • 23 non-listed companies based growth impacts, sector re-weighting requirements of the TCFD (i.e., gaining on the following criteria: majority and other macroeconomic factors. a maximum score of 3 for each of the of the shareholders in Belgium, • Physical impacts reflect the changes 11 recommendations). sector (identified by the TCFD as in the physical climate (e.g., altered most exposed to climate-related rainfall amounts, intensities and risks or one of the four selected timings) that may impact future Selection of companies relevant non-key TCFD-sectors) and business activities. company size. The energy sector was excluded from the assessment We have selected 56 companies in because of the first criterium. Scoring 10 different sectors. The sectors are the ones identified by the TCFD recommendations as most vulnerable Companies were scored on the to climate change impacts: Banks, availability and quality of their climate- Insurance companies, Asset owners related disclosures, using the following and Asset managers, Energy, scoring system: Transportation, Materials and 0 — Not publicly disclosed Buildings, Agriculture, Food and Forest products. We have added four 1 — Limited discussion of the aspects sectors to our assessment based on (or only partially discussed) the importance to our economy and the potential overall impact of climate 2 — Aspects are discussed in detail change across the value chains: Retail, 3 — Addressed all features of the Health and Consumer Goods, as well aspect in the disclosure as Telecom and Services, Holdings and Technology. 60% of the companies assessed are listed on Euronext. Sector Sectors identified by TCFD as most Number of companies exposed to risk assessed Food & Beverage Agriculture, Food and Forest products 9 Banks & Asset managers Banks & Asset managers 6 Insurance Insurance 3 Manufacturing Materials and Buildings 11 Real estate Materials and Buildings 4 Transport Transport 4 Health, Retail and Consumer goods N/A 6 Technology N/A 5 Telecom and Services N/A 4 Holdings N/A 4 Total 56 Belgium Climate Risk Disclosure Barometer Study | 5 Key findings Our analysis shows that two out of three companies financial impact that different climate scenarios could assessed have disclosed some climate-related risks. This have on their business, strategy and financial planning. proves that many companies are aware of the challenges Climate change scenario planning not only addresses related to climate change. the TCFD recommendations, but also – and primarily – provides companies with new inputs into business strategy There is however room for improvement, especially in and planning, which enhances internal capabilities and terms of quality of disclosures. The overall score of 31% processes. shows that the level of detail of information is still limited. The responsiveness to the TCFD recommendations differs Almost the entire economy will be facing major disruption significantly within every sector. The scores in each sector from climate transition and climate impacts over the coming vary considerably between one or a few high performers, a years. Yet, a majority of companies are not engaging middle bracket and a number of low-performing companies. strategically with these risks or positioning themselves to take advantage of potential opportunities. With investors Assessing climate-related risks and opportunities is complex paying increasing attention, this is likely to affect their and requires detailed analysis on how climate change valuation even before the impacts are fully realized. impacts a business and how the business is responding. The majority of companies have yet to report on the potential Average results per TCFD component Belgian versus global results The TCFD recommendations which companies reported best While the TCFD recommendations are globally the most on are “metrics and targets” (mainly driven by reporting on recognized framework for climate-related disclosures and Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions) and “governance” analyses, full compliance is for companies worldwide a in the second instance. Disclosures relating to “strategy”