DOCSLIB.ORG

Congress, the Court, and the Constitution

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Congress, the Court, and the Constitution CONGRESS, THE COURT, AND THE CONSTITUTION HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE CONSTITUTION OF THE COMMITTEE ONTHEJUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JANUARY 29, 1998 Serial No. 124 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 58-804 WASHINGTON : 1999 For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office. Washington. DC 20402 ISBN 0-16-059740-4 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois, Chairman F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR. , JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan Wisconsin BARNEY FRANK, Massachusetts BILL McCOLLUM, Florida CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York GEORGE W. GEKAS, Pennsylvania HOWARD L. BERMAN, California HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina RICK BOUCHER, Virginia LAMAR SMITH, Texas JERROLD NADLER, New York STEVEN SCHIFF, New Mexico ROBERT C. SCOTT, Virginia ELTON GALLEGLY, California MELVIN L. WATT, North Carolina CHARLES T. CANADY, Florida ZOE LOFGREN, California BOB INGLIS, South Carolina SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas BOB GOOLATTE, Virginia MAXINE WATERS, California STEPHEN E. BUYER, Indiana MARTIN T. MEEHAN, Massachusetts ED BRYANT, Tennessee WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts STEVE CHABOT, Ohio ROBERT WEXLER, Florida BOB BARR, Georgia STEVEN R. ROTHMAN, New Jersey WILLIAM L. JENKINS, Tennessee ASA HUTCHINSON, Arkansas EDWARD A. PEASE, Indiana CHRIS CANNON, Utah THOMAS E. MOONEY, Chief of Staff-General Counsel JULIAN EPSTEIN, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE CONSTITUTION CHARLES T. CANADY, Florida, Chairman HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois ROBERT C. SCOTT, Virginia BOB INGLIS, South Carolina MAXINE WATERS, California ED BRYANT, Tennessee JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan WILLIAM L. JENKINS, Tennessee JERROLD NADLER, New York BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia MELVIN L. WATT, North Carolina BOB BARR, Georgia ASA HUTCHINSON, Arkansas KERI FOLMAR, Chief Counsel JOHN H. LADD, Counsel ROBERT J. CORRY, Counsel CATHLEEN CLEAVER, Counsel (II) CONTENTS HEARING DATE Page January 29, 1998 1 OPENING STATEMENT Canady, Hon. Charles T., a Representative in Congress from the State of Florida, and chairman, Subcommittee on the Constitution 1 WITNESSES Campbell, Hon. Tom, a Representative in Congress from the State of Califor­ nia 13 Clinton, Robert L., Associate Professor of Political Science, Southern Illinois University 94 Currie, David P., Edward H. Levi Distinguished Service Professor, University of Chicago School of Law 57 Devins, Neal, Goodrich Professor of Law, College of William and Mary 63 Fisher, Louis, Senior Specialist in Separation of Powers, Congressional Re- search Service 17 Franck, Matthew J., Chairman and Associate Professor of Political Science, Radford University 85 Frank, Hon. Barney, a Representative in Congress from the State of Massa­ chusetts .... 11 Hostettler, Hon. John N., a Representative in Congress from the State of Indiana 7 Kinkopf, Neil, Visiting Assistant Professor of Law, Case Western Reserve University Law School 70 Lewis, Hon. Ron, a Representative in Congress from the State of Kentucky .... 3 Strossen, Nadine, President, American Civil Liberties Union 79 LETTERS, STATEMENTS, ETC., SUBMITTED FOR THE HEARING Clinton, Robert L., Associate Professor of Political Science, Southern Illinois University: Prepared statement 96 Currie, David P., Edward H. Levi Distinguished Service Professor, University of Chicago School of Law: Prepared statement 59 Devins, Neal, Goodrich Professor of Law, College of William and Mary: Pre- pared statement 65 Fisher, Louis, Senior Specialist in Separation of Powers, Congressional Re- search Service: Prepared statement 19 Franck, Matthew J., Chairman and Associate Professor of Political Science, Radford University: Prepared statement 87 Hostettler, Hon. John N., a Representative in Congress from the State of Indiana: Prepared statement 9 Kinkopf, Neil, Visiting Assistant Professor of Law, Case Western Reserve University Law School: Prepared statement 72 Lewis, Hon. Ron, a Representative in Congress from the State of Kentucky: Prepared statement 5 Strossen, Nadine, President, American Civil Liberties Union: Prepared state­ ment 81 APPENDIX Material submitted for the record 125 (III) CONGRESS, THE COURT, AND THE CONSTITUTION THURSDAY, JANUARY 29, 1998 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE CONSTITUTION, COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, Washington, DC. The subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 9:32 a.m., in Room 2226, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Charles Canady [chair- man of the subcommittee] presiding. Present: Representatives Charles T. Canady, Henry J. Hyde, Ed Bryant, William L. Jenkins, Bob Goodlatte, Bob Barr, Asa Hutch­ inson, Robert C. Scott, Maxine Waters, and Melvin L. Watt. Staff present: John Ladd, Counsel; Keri Folmar, Chief Counsel; Brett Shogren, Research Assistant; Michael Connally, Staff Assist- ant; Brian Woolfolk, Minority Staff; Julian Epstein, Minority Staff Director, and Robert Carry, Counsel. OPENING STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN CANADY Mr. CANADY [presiding]. The subcommittee will be in order. The subcommittee is holding this hearing today to examine the respective roles of the Congress and the Supreme Court in inter­ preting the Constitution. With the help of our witnesses today, we will consider whether one branch of our Federal Government has a monopoly on Constitutional interpretation. I believe the framers of our Constitution expected the Congress to play an important role in debating and legislating our constitu­ tional issues. It is important to the Congress to ask itself if def­ erence to the Supreme Court is always the order of the day. We have a responsibility to consider the circumstances under which the Congress should or should not defer to the Supreme Court in making Constitutional interpretations. And we have the duty to en- sure that the requirements of the Constitution are consistently rec­ ognized and honored in the legislative process. While the exclusive focus of today's hearing is not the Court's Boerne v. Flores decision of last term, that case does represent the most recent expression of tension in an ongoing relationship be- tween the Congress and the Court. Despite the Court's holding in Boerne, Justice Kennedy stated to the Court that, and I quote, "When the Congress acts within its sphere of power and respon­ sibility, it has not just the right but the duty to make its own in- formed judgment of the meaning and force of the Constitution." In light of the result in Boerne, it is incumbent on Members of Congress to reflect on the scope of our sphere of power and respon­ (1) 2 sibilities so that we can exercise our duty, as Justice Kennedy put it, "to make our own informed judgment on the meaning and force of the Constitution." I look forward to hearing from our witnesses today, and I now recognize Mr. Scott for 5 minutes. Mr. SCOTT. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and I appreciate the op­ portunity we're taking to examine the relationship between Con­ gress, the Court, and the Constitution. Constitutional tension be- tween Congress and the judiciary is nothing new. The drafters of the Constitution established three branches of Government, all with equal responsibilities, to protect and uphold the Constitution. The strength of our system of Government is based on the inter- dependence of three separate but equal branches of Government. The fact that from time-to-time the branches disagree is a tribute to our democracy and in no way threatens the sovereignty of its people. We should take pride in knowing that our vigorous system of checks and balances not only protects us from external threats at home and abroad, but also protects us from the greatest threat ever imagined by our Founding Fathers, and that threat is our- selves. I understand that there have been a number of proposals in- tended to minimize the healthy tension now existing between Con­ gress and the courts. I am particularly concerned by the suggestion by some that we should more frequently exercise our impeachment powers to rid ourselves of the actions of activist judges who thwart the will of the people, and we should investigate these judges, Mr. Chairman. I understand that in the 1996-97 term of the Supreme Court, four of the seven acts of Congress reviewed were invalidated. Only two justices voted to invalidate all seven of the acts of Congress considered in the most recent term, taking every opportunity they had to thwart the will of the people. There was another judge that voted six out of seven times to thwart the will of the people, and we should investigate and expose these justices for thwarting the will of the people. And Mr. Chairman, we need to do some research to find out who these justices are. Mr. CANADY. Wait Mr. SCOTT. Wait a minute, Mr. Chairman. My staff has already supplied me with that information—seven out of seven; Justice Scalia and Justice Thomas—six out of seven; Chief Justice Rehnquist. I look forward to the testimony of the witnesses, Mr. Chairman, to see whether or not we would have been better off without these activist judges on our Court. [Laughter.] So I look forward to the testimony of the witnesses, Mr. Chair- man, and thank you for calling the hearing. I am particularly look­ ing forward to hearing from Professor Devins, who is a professor at William and Mary Marshall School of Law, which, depending on the actions of the General Assembly tomorrow and the next day, may be in or out of my district. [Laughter.] Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. CANADY. Thank you, Mr. Scott. With the General Assembly meeting on a such a matter today, I'm very pleased that you were able to be here. [Laughter.] 3 Mr. SCOTT. I'm well-represented today in Richmond, you can be sure. Mr. CANADY. I'm sure you are. We're very pleased to have a distinguished panel of Members to start off the hearing today. We have four Members on this panel. The first to testify will be the Honorable Ron Lewis. Congressman Lewis represents the 2nd District of Kentucky and serves on both the Agriculture and National Security Committees in the U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aug. 15, 2018 the Honorable Pat Roberts the Honorable Mike
    Aug. 15, 2018 The Honorable Pat Roberts The Honorable Mike Conaway Chairman Chairman Senate Committee on Agriculture, House Committee on Agriculture Nutrition & Forestry The Honorable Debbie Stabenow The Honorable Collin Peterson Ranking Member Ranking Member Senate Committee on Agriculture, House Committee on Agriculture Nutrition & Forestry Dear Chairman Roberts, Chairman Conaway, Ranking Member Stabenow, Ranking Member Peterson and Members of the Conference Committee: The National Pork Producers Council, an association of 42 state pork organizations that represents the interests in Washington, D.C., of America’s 60,000 pork producers, writes to express its strong support for the conference committee’s work on a 2018 Farm Bill and, in particular, two provisions in it that will be considered during the panel’s deliberations. Those provisions, one setting up and funding a robust Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD) vaccine bank and the other protecting interstate commerce and prohibiting one state from regulating agricultural practices in other states, are vital to the viability of America’s farmers and ranchers and to their ability to produce safe, affordable food. As you know, FMD is an infectious viral disease that affects cloven-hooved animals, including cattle, pigs and sheep; it is not a food safety or human health threat. Although the disease hasn’t been in the United States since 1929, it is endemic in many parts of the world, and our country is ill-prepared to deal with an outbreak should FMD reach our shores. Without the ability to control the disease through vaccination, U.S. meat and dairy export markets – which would close immediately on confirmation of an outbreak – would remain shuttered indefinitely.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Calendar No. 481 104Th Congress, 2D Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Report 104–879
    1 Union Calendar No. 481 104th Congress, 2d Session ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± House Report 104±879 REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES DURING THE ONE HUNDRED FOURTH CONGRESS PURSUANT TO CLAUSE 1(d) RULE XI OF THE RULES OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES JANUARY 2, 1997.ÐCommitted to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 36±501 WASHINGTON : 1997 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FOURTH CONGRESS HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois, Chairman 1 CARLOS J. MOORHEAD, California JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., PATRICIA SCHROEDER, Colorado Wisconsin BARNEY FRANK, Massachusetts BILL MCCOLLUM, Florida CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York GEORGE W. GEKAS, Pennsylvania HOWARD L. BERMAN, California HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina RICH BOUCHER, Virginia LAMAR SMITH, Texas JOHN BRYANT, Texas STEVEN SCHIFF, New Mexico JACK REED, Rhode Island ELTON GALLEGLY, California JERROLD NADLER, New York CHARLES T. CANADY, Florida ROBERT C. SCOTT, Virginia BOB INGLIS, South Carolina MELVIN L. WATT, North Carolina BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia XAVIER BECERRA, California STEPHEN E. BUYER, Indiana JOSEÂ E. SERRANO, New York 2 MARTIN R. HOKE, Ohio ZOE LOFGREN, California SONNY BONO, California SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas FRED HEINEMAN, North Carolina MAXINE WATERS, California 3 ED BRYANT, Tennessee STEVE CHABOT, Ohio MICHAEL PATRICK FLANAGAN, Illinois BOB BARR, Georgia ALAN F. COFFEY, JR., General Counsel/Staff Director JULIAN EPSTEIN, Minority Staff Director 1 Henry J. Hyde, Illinois, elected to the Committee as Chairman pursuant to House Resolution 11, approved by the House January 5 (legislative day of January 4), 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • John Conyers, Jr
    U.S. Representative JOHN CONYERS, JR. D–14th Congressional District District: County of Wayne (part) Office: 2426 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20515, (202) 225-5126 Biography: Democrat, of Detroit; born May 16, 1929, son of John and Lucille Conyers; B.A., Wayne State University, 1957; J.D., Wayne State Law School, 1958; honorary LL.D., Wilberforce University, 1969; married to Monica; two sons, John III and Carl Edward; Tabernacle Baptist Church; officer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, served one year in Korea, awarded combat and merit citations; legislative assistant to Congressman John Dingell, 1958-1961; senior partner in firm of Conyers, Bell and Townsend, 1959-1961; referee, Michigan Workmen’s Compensation Department, 1961-1963; director of edu- cation, Local 900 UAW; executive board member, Detroit Branch NAACP and Wolver ine Bar Association; advisory council member, Michigan Civil Liberties Union; general counsel, Detroit Trade Union Leadership Council; vice chair, National Board of Americans for Democratic Action, National Advisory Board-American Civil Liberties Union; board member, director, sponsor, and/or member of over 75 other organiza- tions, including the African-American Institute, Trans Africa Commission for Racial Justice, Detroit Institute of Art, National Alliance Against Racist and Political Repression, and National League of Cities; author of numerous articles; ranking member, Judiciary Com mittee; founding member and dean, Congressional Black Caucus; recipient, Southern Christian Leadership Conference
    [Show full text]
  • 1990 GENERAL ELECTION UNITED STATES SENATOR Democrat Baron P. Hill 28,655 Republican Dan Coats 23,582 SECRETARY of STATE Democrat Joseph H
    1990 GENERAL ELECTION UNITED STATES SENATOR democrat Baron P. Hill 28,655 republican Dan Coats 23,582 SECRETARY OF STATE democrat Joseph H. Hogsett 27,842 republican William H. Hudnut III 23,973 AUDITOR OF STATE democrat Ann A. Whaley 25,695 republican Ann G. DeVore 23,193 TREASURER OF STATE democrat Thomas L. New 22,590 republican Marjorie H. O'Laughlin 27,586 CLERK OF SUPREME & APPELLATE COURTS democrat Dwayne M. Brown 27,409 republican Daniel Rock Heiser 20,343 CONGRESS 8TH DISTRICT democrat Frank McCloskey 27,856 republican Richard E. Mourdock 24,892 STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 49 democrat Joseph F. O'Day 13,691 republican Linda L. Orth 7,746 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 75 democrat Dennis T. Avery 15,298 democrat Mark Alan sunderman 9,545 republican Vaneta G. Becker 20,226 republican Joseph H. Harrison, Jr. 14,079 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 76 democrat Larry E. Lutz 6,235 republican Jan Gallo 3,248 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 77 democrat J. Jeff Hays 10,093 PROSECUTING ATTORNEY democrat Stanley M. Levco 31,947 republican Glen A. Deig 19,795 COUNTY AUDITOR democrat Sam Humphrey 28,171 republican Genna A. Lloyd 23,514 COUNTY SHERIFF democrat Ray Hamner 26,954 republican Joe Rhodes 25,711 COUNTY ASSESSOR democrat James L. Angermeier 27,775 republican Ed Witte 23,494 COMMISSIONER DISTRICT TWO democrat Mark R. Owen 25,245 republican Don L. Hunter 26,391 COUNTY COUNCIL DISTRICT ONE democrat Robert Lutz 5,108 republican James B. Raben 5,706 COUNTY COUNCIL DISTRICT TWO democrat no candidate republican Curt Wortman 10,479 COUNTY COUNCIL DISTRICT THREE democrat Bill Palmer Taylor 4,482 republican Michael J.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Letter Regarding CFTC Reauthorization
    December 7, 2005 The Honorable Bob Goodlatte The Honorable Collin Peterson Chairman Ranking Member United States House of Representatives United States House of Representatives Committee on Agriculture Committee on Agriculture 1301 LHOB 1301 LHOB Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20515 Dear Mr. Chairman and Ranking Member Peterson: The undersigned Associations have serious concerns about the House Agriculture Committee’s draft bill, with the accompanying natural gas amendment, to reauthorize the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). As proposed, the legislation raises significant issues of scope and policy as well as technical issues having potentially substantive consequences on the over-the-counter derivative markets. The proposed legislation would unnecessarily extend CFTC jurisdiction beyond futures and options markets and impose new regulation unwarranted by market events. While the staff of the Agriculture Committee has made a good faith effort to address the Associations’ concerns in a number of areas, we unfortunately must oppose the Committee’s reauthorization bill and the accompanying natural gas amendment in the current form. We respectfully request a postponement of the markup scheduled for Wednesday December 7 in order to work on further revisions to the draft bill. We support, in scope and substance, the fundamental approach to the Zelener issue reflected in the legislation proposed by the President’s Working Group for Financial Markets. We believe, however, that a number of technical changes to the PWG draft legislation are needed. The Committee’s draft bill does not yet reflect any of these changes We are most concerned that the natural gas amendment includes expansive new provisions governing position reporting and market surveillance that raise significant questions of policy, scope, and construction.
    [Show full text]
  • CAPITOL NEWS UPDATE August 7, 2020
    MCALVEY MERCHANT & ASSOCIATES CAPITOL NEWS UPDATE August 7, 2020 CAPITOL NEWS UPDATE WEEK OF AUGUST 3, 2020 Integrity, Individual Attention. Precision Strategy. Proven Results RECORD-SETTING PRIMARY ELECTIONS A record number of voters participated in Michigan’s primary election on Aug. 4, with more than 2.5 million people casting a vote either in person or by absentee ballot. One of the most followed races in the primary was the 13th Congressional District rematch between U.S. Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Detroit) and Detroit City Council President Brenda Jones. Jones represented the district for a few weeks in 2018, following the resignation of Rep. John Conyers (D-Detroit) in December 2017. After his resignation, there were two elections for the seat with Jones winning the special election to complete Conyers unexpired term, and Tlaib winning the regular race for the Congressional seat. This year, Tlaib and Jones were the only primary candidates. On Tuesday, Tlaib won the strongly Democratic district with nearly twice as many votes as Jones, potentially guaranteeing her a second term. In the 3rd Congressional District in West Michigan, Republican Peter Meijer, a U.S. Army veteran whose family founded the well-known Meijer retail chain, won a five-way contest with more than 50 percent of the vote, including holding a strong lead over his main opponent Rep. Lynn Afendoulis. Meijer will face Democratic attorney Hillary Scholten. The winner of that race will succeed U.S. Rep. Justin Amash, a former Republican turned Libertarian who is not seeking reelection. In the 10th Congressional District, a Republican stronghold in the Thumb region, Republican businesswoman Lisa McClain of Bruce Township, a pro-Trump Republican who outspent her opponents, beat state Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks at a Florida Victory 2006 Rally in Pensacola
    2006 Nov. 5 / Administration of George W. Bush, 2006 to lay the foundation of peace for generations I’m proud to be here in the district of a to come, you vote Republican. fine United States Congressman, Congress- I thank you for coming. Go vote. Get your man Jeff Miller. I want to thank you and neighbors and friends to vote. And send Jim Vicki for being here. Miller always talks Ryun back to the United States Congress. about the good folks in this district. Every God bless. And God bless America. time I see him he’s saying, ‘‘Don’t you forget the people in the panhandle.’’ And I say, NOTE: The President spoke at 6:10 p.m. at the ‘‘Congressman, how could I forget them; I Kansas Expocentre. In his remarks, he referred wouldn’t be President without them.’’ to Anne Ryun, wife of Representative Jim Ryun; We’re 24 hours away from voting. Some Kansas State Attorney General Phill Kline; former of the folks in Washington already think they President Saddam Hussein of Iraq; Usama bin Laden, leader of the Al Qaida terrorist organiza- figured out the results. tion; and former Prime Minister Junichiro Audience members. Boo-o-o! Koizumi of Japan. The President. That’s what happened in 2004. [Laughter] Some of them up there started listening to the prognosticators and Remarks at a Florida Victory 2006 started picking out their offices in the West Rally in Pensacola, Florida Wing. [Laughter] Then the people in Florida November 6, 2006 voted, and the people around the country voted, and the movers weren’t needed.
    [Show full text]
  • International Society of Barristers Quarterly
    International Society of Barristers Volume 52 Number 2 ATTICUS FINCH: THE BIOGRAPHY—HARPER LEE, HER FATHER, AND THE MAKING OF AN AMERICAN ICON Joseph Crespino TAMING THE STORM: THE LIFE AND TIMES OF JUDGE FRANK M. JOHNSON JR. AND THE SOUTH’S FIGHT OVER CIVIL RIGHTS Jack Bass TOMMY MALONE: THE GUIDING HAND SHAPING ONE OF AMERICA’S GREATEST TRIAL LAWYERS Vincent Coppola THE INNOCENCE PROJECT Barry Scheck Quarterly Annual Meetings 2020: March 22–28, The Sanctuary at Kiawah Island, Kiawah Island, South Carolina 2021: April 25–30, The Shelbourne Hotel, Dublin, Ireland International Society of Barristers Quarterly Volume 52 2019 Number 2 CONTENTS Atticus Finch: The Biography—Harper Lee, Her Father, and the Making of an American Icon . 1 Joseph Crespino Taming the Storm: The Life and Times of Judge Frank M. Johnson Jr. and the South’s Fight over Civil Rights. 13 Jack Bass Tommy Malone: The Guiding Hand Shaping One of America’s Greatest Trial Lawyers . 27 Vincent Coppola The Innocence Project . 41 Barry Scheck i International Society of Barristers Quarterly Editor Donald H. Beskind Associate Editor Joan Ames Magat Editorial Advisory Board Daniel J. Kelly J. Kenneth McEwan, ex officio Editorial Office Duke University School of Law Box 90360 Durham, North Carolina 27708-0360 Telephone (919) 613-7085 Fax (919) 613-7231 E-mail: [email protected] Volume 52 Issue Number 2 2019 The INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF BARRISTERS QUARTERLY (USPS 0074-970) (ISSN 0020- 8752) is published quarterly by the International Society of Barristers, Duke University School of Law, Box 90360, Durham, NC, 27708-0360.
    [Show full text]
  • MICROCOMP Output File
    FINAL EDITION OFFICIAL LIST OF MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES of the UNITED STATES AND THEIR PLACES OF RESIDENCE ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS . JANUARY 4, 2001 Compiled by JEFF TRANDAHL, Clerk of the House of Representatives http://clerk.house.gov Republicans in roman (222); Democrats in italic (208); Independents in SMALL CAPS (2); vacancies (3) 1st VA, 4th MN, 32d CA; total 435. The number preceding the name is the Member’s district. ALABAMA 1 Sonny Callahan ........................................... Mobile 2 Terry Everett ............................................... Enterprise 3 Bob Riley ..................................................... Ashland 4 Robert B. Aderholt ...................................... Haleyville 5 Robert E. (Bud) Cramer, Jr. ........................ Huntsville 6 Spencer Bachus ........................................... Vestavia Hills 7 Earl F. Hilliard ........................................... Birmingham ALASKA AT LARGE Don Young ................................................... Fort Yukon ARIZONA 1 Matt Salmon ................................................ Mesa 2 Ed Pastor ..................................................... Phoenix 3 Bob Stump ................................................... Tolleson 4 John B. Shadegg .......................................... Phoenix 5 Jim Kolbe ..................................................... Tucson 6 J. D. Hayworth ............................................ Scottsdale ARKANSAS 1 Marion Berry ............................................... Gillett
    [Show full text]
  • The Collapse of Executive Life Insurance Co. and Its Impact on Policyholders
    THE COLLAPSE OF EXECUTIVE LIFE INSURANCE CO. AND ITS IMPACT ON POLICYHOLDERS HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION OCTOBER 10, 2002 Serial No. 107–142 Printed for the use of the Committee on Government Reform ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/congress/house http://www.house.gov/reform U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 83–976 PDF WASHINGTON : 2003 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 11:30 Jan 30, 2003 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 C:\DOCS\83976.TXT HGOVREF1 PsN: HGOVREF1 COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM DAN BURTON, Indiana, Chairman BENJAMIN A. GILMAN, New York HENRY A. WAXMAN, California CONSTANCE A. MORELLA, Maryland TOM LANTOS, California CHRISTOPHER SHAYS, Connecticut MAJOR R. OWENS, New York ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida EDOLPHUS TOWNS, New York JOHN M. MCHUGH, New York PAUL E. KANJORSKI, Pennsylvania STEPHEN HORN, California PATSY T. MINK, Hawaii JOHN L. MICA, Florida CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York THOMAS M. DAVIS, Virginia ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, Washington, MARK E. SOUDER, Indiana DC STEVEN C. LATOURETTE, Ohio ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland BOB BARR, Georgia DENNIS J. KUCINICH, Ohio DAN MILLER, Florida ROD R. BLAGOJEVICH, Illinois DOUG OSE, California DANNY K. DAVIS, Illinois RON LEWIS, Kentucky JOHN F. TIERNEY, Massachusetts JO ANN DAVIS, Virginia JIM TURNER, Texas TODD RUSSELL PLATTS, Pennsylvania THOMAS H.
    [Show full text]
  • Race, Civil Rights, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Judicial Circuit
    RACE, CIVIL RIGHTS, AND THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT By JOHN MICHAEL SPIVACK A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE COUNCIL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1978 Copyright 1978 by John Michael Spivack ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In apportioning blame or credit for what follows, the allocation is clear. Whatever blame attaches for errors of fact or interpretation are mine alone. Whatever deserves credit is due to the aid and direction of those to whom I now refer. The direction, guidance, and editorial aid of Dr. David M. Chalmers of the University of Florida has been vital in the preparation of this study and a gift of intellect and friendship. his Without persistent encouragement, I would long ago have returned to the wilds of legal practice. My debt to him is substantial. Dr. Larry Berkson of the American Judicature Society provided an essential intro- duction to the literature on the federal court system. Dr. Richard Scher of the University of Florida has my gratitude for his critical but kindly reading of the manuscript. Dean Allen E. Smith of the University of Missouri College of Law and Fifth Circuit Judge James P. Coleman have me deepest thanks for sharing their special insight into Judges Joseph C. Hutcheson, Jr., and Ben Cameron with me. Their candor, interest, and hospitality are appre- ciated. Dean Frank T. Read of the University of Tulsa School of Law, who is co-author of an exhaustive history of desegregation in the Fifth Cir- cuit, was kind enough to confirm my own estimation of the judges from his broad and informed perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Standing Doctrine, Judicial Technique, and the Gradual Shift from Rights-Based Constitutionalism to Executne-Centered Constitutionalism
    Golden Gate University School of Law GGU Law Digital Commons Publications Faculty Scholarship 2009 Standing Doctrine, Judicial Technique, and the Gradual Shift rF om Rights-Based Constitutionalism to Executive-Centered Constitutionalism Laura A. Cisneros Golden Gate University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/pubs Recommended Citation 59 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 1089 (2009) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at GGU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications by an authorized administrator of GGU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE STANDING DOCTRINE, JUDICIAL TECHNIQUE, AND THE GRADUAL SHIFT FROM RIGHTS-BASED CONSTITUTIONALISM TO EXECUTNE-CENTERED CONSTITUTIONALISM Laura A. Cisneros t ABSTRACT Although scholars have long criticized the standing doctrine for its malleability, its incoherence, and its inconsistent application, few have considered whether this chaos is related to the Court's insistence that standing be used as a tool to maintain separation of powers.] Most articles on Copyright © 2008 by Laura A. Cisneros. t Assistant Professor of Law, Thurgood Marshall School of Law; LL.M., University of Wisconsin Law School; J.D., Loyola University New Orleans School of Law; B.A., University of San Diego. I would like to thank Arthur McEvoy and Victoria Nourse for their feedback on earlier drafts of this Article. I am also grateful to the William H. Hastie Fellowship Program at the University of Wisconsin for its support of my research. Finally, I am grateful to the organizers and participants in the Scholarly Papers panel at the 2009 Association of American Law Schools' Annual Conference for the opportunity to present and discuss this project.
    [Show full text]