DOCSLIB.ORG

2008 Medicine Bow 5 Year

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Medicine Bow National Forest Routt National Forest 200 8 Monitoring Report Medicine Bow NF 5 Year Evaluation Routt NF 10 Year Review Fiscal Years 2004 to 2008 October 1, 200 3 through September 30, 2008 United States Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................... 2 Certification .............................................................................................. 4 Introduction .............................................................................................. 5 Conclusions and Recommendations ................................................................... 7 Conclusions and Recommendations ................................................................... 7 Forest Plan and Policy Updates ........................................................................ 9 Adjustments to the Forest Plans .................................................................... 9 New Laws and Regulations ............................................................................ 10 Projects and Ongoing Activities ......................................................................... 12 Community Involvement ............................................................................ 12 Projects Completed During FY08 ..................................................................... 15 Monitoring items ........................................................................................... 18 Ensure Sustainable Ecosystems ....................................................................... 18 Watershed Condition ................................................................................ 18 Riparian and Wetland Conditions .................................................................. 21 Stream flows .......................................................................................... 24 Soil Productivity ...................................................................................... 26 Air Quality ............................................................................................. 28 Water Quality ......................................................................................... 29 Vegetation Composition and Structure .............................................................. 41 Restoration, Enhancement and Commodity Production ........................................... 43 Ensure Sustainable Ecosystems ....................................................................... 46 Habitat Improvement ................................................................................ 46 Old Growth and Late Successional Forest Structure ............................................ 50 Threatened, Endangered, Sensitive Species and MIS Habitat and Populations.............. 60 Terrestrial Wildlife .................................................................................. 71 Fire Management Plans .............................................................................. 95 Fuels Treatments..................................................................................... 96 Insects and Disease .................................................................................. 97 Invasive Species ...................................................................................... 99 Landscape Patterns .................................................................................102 Multiple Benefits to People ..........................................................................105 Effects of Recreation Activities ...................................................................105 Recreational Opportunities ........................................................................108 Outdoor Recreation .................................................................................111 Recreation Infrastructure ..........................................................................116 Effects of Off-Road Vehicles ......................................................................117 Scenery ...............................................................................................120 Wilderness Opportunities ..........................................................................122 Wilderness Monitoring Plans .......................................................................122 Wilderness Rehabilitation ..........................................................................123 Protected Areas .....................................................................................124 Livestock Use ........................................................................................124 Big Game .............................................................................................126 Miscellaneous Products .............................................................................127 Snowy Range Scenic Byway ........................................................................128 Research Natural Areas ............................................................................129 Land Ownership .....................................................................................130 2 Rights of Way Acquisition ..........................................................................131 Harvested Land Adequately Restocked ..........................................................131 Costs ..................................................................................................132 Comparison of Estimated and Actual Outputs and Services ..................................134 Communities .........................................................................................134 Scientific and Technical Assistance .................................................................140 Collaboration ........................................................................................140 Partnerships..........................................................................................141 Interpretation and Watchable Wildlife ..........................................................143 Knowledge Base .....................................................................................147 Effective Public Service ...............................................................................148 Road System .........................................................................................148 Roads – Road Decommissioning ...................................................................151 Facilities – Safety and Security ....................................................................151 Implementation Monitoring ..........................................................................152 Endangered Species Act ............................................................................152 Implementation of Standards and Guidelines ...................................................154 Implementation Monitoring /Scientific and Technical Assistance: ..........................193 References ................................................................................................194 Interdisciplinary Team ...................................................................................200 Acronyms - ...............................................................................................201 Appendix A ................................................................................................204 3 Certification The Medicine Bow National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (Medicine Bow Plan) Record of Decision (ROD) was signed on December 29, 2003. The Routt National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (Routt Plan) Record of Decision (ROD) was signed on February 17, 1998. The Plans are dynamic documents, subject to change based on annual monitoring and evaluation as we implement them. Monitoring is intended to provide me with information necessary to determine whether the Plans are sufficient to guide management of the Medicine Bow and Routt National Forests for the subsequent year or whether modification of the Plans or if modifications of management actions are necessary. I have reviewed the Five Year Review and 2008 Annual Implementation and Monitoring Report for the Medicine Bow and Routt National Forests that was prepared by the Forest Interdisciplinary Team (IDT). Overall, the 2008 Monitoring and Evaluation results indicate that the management of both Forests meets goals, objectives, standards and guidelines, and management area prescriptions. I believe that the results of monitoring and evaluation for FY08 meet the intent of Chapter 4 of the two Forest Plans. I also believe that the monitoring and evaluation requirements displayed in Chapter 4 of the Forest Plans have been met, and that the decisions made in the Forest Plans are still valid. The Forest IDT has not identified any modifications to the Plans or adjustments to management actions. The Medicine Bow Plan and Routt Plan are sufficient to continue to guide management of the Forests. Please contact Frank Romero at the Medicine Bow-Routt National Forests, 2468 Jackson Street, Laramie, Wyoming, 82070, or call (307) 745-2300, if you have any specific concerns, questions, or comments about this report. /s/ Phil Cruz 09/29/2010 PHIL CRUZ Date Acting, Forest Supervisor 4 Introduction The Medicine Bow and Routt National Forests and Thunder Basin National Grassland are managed under the administrative unit known
Recommended publications
  • FS Region 2 Snowmobile Trespass Strategy

    FS Region 2 Snowmobile Trespass Strategy

    Rocky Mountain Region Information and Education Strategy For The Prevention of Snowmobile Trespass In Wilderness Third Edition January 2004 - -1 Table of Contents Page I. Problem Statement 1 II. Current Situation 1 III. Current Direction 3 IV. Implementation and Responsibilities 3 V. Monitoring and Reporting 4 VI. Using the Appendices and Tool Kit 4 VII. Appendices A. Excerpts from the Wilderness Act of 1964 6 B. Selected References from the Code of Federal Regulations 7 C. Selected References from Forest Service Manual 2320 8 D. Patrol Ideas 11 E. Potential Cooperators/Contacts for Reaching Local Users 13 F. Potential Cooperators/Contacts for Reaching Non-local Users 15 G. In-house I&E Ideas 17 H. Suggested Actions for Dealing With Intentional Trespass 18 I. Tool and Techniques - Law Enforcement and the “Authority Of The Resource" 19 J. What Harm Is There in Operating My Snowmobile in Wilderness? 25 K. Why is Wilderness Closed to Motorized and Mechanical Travel? 26 L. State Registration Agencies, State Snowmobile Associations and Snowmobile Clubs 27 M. Annual Monitoring Report 35 VIII. Tool Kit 38 1 - -1 I. Problem Statement The Wilderness Act of 1964 first created Congressionally designated wilderness. The Act stated that "In order to assure that an increasing population, accompanied by expanding settlement and growing mechanization, does not occupy and modify all areas within the United States ... it is hereby declared to be the policy of Congress to secure for the American people of present and future generations the benefits of an enduring resource of wilderness". The Act defined wilderness as having outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive and unconfined type of recreation.
  • A History of Northwest Colorado

    A History of Northwest Colorado

    II* 88055956 AN ISOLATED EMPIRE BLM Library Denver Federal Center Bldg. 50, OC-521 P-O. Box 25047 Denver, CO 80225 PARE* BY FREDERIC J. ATHEARN IrORIAh ORADO STATE OFFICE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 1976 f- W TABLE OF CONTENTS Wb Preface. i Introduction and Chronological Summary . iv I. Northwestern Colorado Prior to Exploitation . 1 II. The Fur Trade. j_j_ III. Exploration in Northwestern Colorado, 1839-1869 23 IV. Mining and Transportation in Early Western Colorado .... 34 V. Confrontations: Settlement Versus the Ute Indians. 45 VI. Settlement in Middle Park and the Yampa Valley. 63 VII. Development of the Cattle and Sheep Industry, 1868-1920... 76 VIII. Mining and Transportation, 1890-1920 .. 91 IX. The "Moffat Road" and Northwestern Colorado, 1903-1948 . 103 X. Development of Northwestern Colorado, 1890-1940. 115 Bibliography 2&sr \)6tWet’ PREFACE Pu£Eose: This study was undertaken to provide the basis for identification and evaluation of historic resources within the Craig, Colorado District of the Bureau of Land Management. The narrative of historic activities serves as a guide and yardstick regarding what physical evidence of these activities—historic sites, structures, ruins and objects—are known or suspected to be present on the land, and evaluation of what their historical significance may be. Such information is essential in making a wide variety of land management decisions effecting historic cultural resources. Objectives: As a basic cultural resource inventory and evaluation tool, the narrative and initial inventory of known historic resources will serve a variety of objectives: 1. Provide information for basic Bureau planning docu¬ ments and land management decisions relating to cultural resources.
  • Mitteilungen 29

    Mitteilungen 29

    MITTEILUNGEN 29. Jahrgang / Heft 1-2019 / kostenlos „Leipziger Kletterschule“ 100 Jahre Ostbruch Brandis 7-Brüche-Wandertag Flyer zum Jubiläum (Beilage im Heft) Wild, Wilder, Wilderness Trekking in den Bergen Colorados Iran Skitour zum Damawand 1 DAV MITTEILUNGEN | AUS DER GESCHÄFTSSTELLE 2 Vorwort Winter ohne Leipzig Den Ein oder Anderen könnte es freuen, dass dieser Winter weite Teile Deutschlands und Ös- doch einige der spannendsten Geschichten bereit, terreich voll im Griff hatte und zum Schnee- die ihr in diesem Heft nacherleben könnt. Eine schuhwandern und Skitouren gehen eingeladen Skitour im Iran, eine Wintertour von Thomas aber hat. Wer jedoch nicht geplant hatte einmal in die auch eine Trekking-Reise in den eher wärmeren Alpen zu fahren, der blieb vom Schnee verschont. Gefilden von Colorado (Teil1) werden euch diese In Leipzig hatte man wie immer das Gefühl un- Ausgabe versüßen. Ebenso fiebere ich bereits den ter einer Glocke zu leben die den Schnee abfängt. ersten warmem Sonnenstrahlen und Tagen am Seit einigen Jahren erlebe ich den Winter hier Fels entgegen. Über Ostern geht es sicher wieder eher als verspäteten Herbst mit reichlich Regen, für ein paar Tage nach Tirol, um einige Projekte Tee und intensivem Hallentraining. Für jemanden vom letzten Jahr in der Ehnbachklamm anzuge- wie mich, der seine Kindheit im Südharz verbracht hen. Einer der schönsten Kletterspots die ich bis- hat, ist das schon etwas gewöhnungsbedürftig. her besuchen durfte. Um wenigstens einen Hauch von Wintergefühl Anlässlich des 150 Jubiläums des Deutschen Al- zu bekommen, muss ich hier schon in den Zug penvereines und auch der Sektion Leipzig, freue steigen. Da freue ich mich umso mehr von den ich mich in diesem Jahr zudem besonders auf die Menschen zu lesen, die sich trotz der hiesigen Jubiläumsfeier am 31.
  • Bayview Property Management Parksville

    Bayview Property Management Parksville

    Bayview Property Management Parksville Gestational Henrique still lames: mousiest and hydrophanous Clemens entitle quite dejectedly but empanelling her laudability materially. Roscian Ignaz degenerates some kabob and superordinated his mudcats so thither! Entrenched and quality Raymundo cobwebbing, but Welsh accommodatingly inveigling her dastardliness. If they guided us using a beautiful quartz counter tops in emails for parksville property of quality canadian independent living area, frequency of the staff Visit site page then find a Brokerage. PRIDEAUX STREET 1 bedroom 1 bathroom top quality apartment 302 309. Bayview at Coal Harbour offers luxury studio one fix two bedroom apartments. Parksville oceanside village resort management ltd. Validate fields in a review that has changed since that can help you must provide a growth area of ownership. You are using a browser that does hush have Flash player enabled or installed. Qualicum Beach resort, with sweeping views of the Sunshine Coast mountains, Texada, Denman, and Hornby Islands and the Georgia Strait. An agent and parksville! We tear it extremely relaxing. You have recently visited this website. There perhaps a huge element of trust with our management consultant knowing by her knowledge of total understanding of the leave legislation by the Strata Property Act might keep us on track. Why you a property managers serving parksville properties for bayview hotel fees that will be updated and homeowners to book a large bedroom. There was very quiet living room to the bayview hotel, hardwood flooring in life. Interested in one probably our properties Apply online Bayview Strata & Rental Services 141 Memorial Ave PO Box 939 Parksville BC.
  • Estimating Natural Visibility Conditions Under the Regional Haze Rule EPA-454/B-03-005 September 2003

    Estimating Natural Visibility Conditions Under the Regional Haze Rule EPA-454/B-03-005 September 2003

    Guidance for Estimating Natural Visibility Conditions Under the Regional Haze Rule EPA-454/B-03-005 September 2003 Guidance for Estimating Natural Visibility Conditions Under the Regional Haze Program Contract No. 68-D-02-0261 Work Order No. 1-06 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Emissions, Monitoring and Analysis Division Air Quality Trends Analysis Group Research Triangle Park, NC DISCLAIMER This report is a work prepared for the United States Government by Battelle. In no event shall either the United States Government or Battelle have any responsibility or liability for any consequences of any use, misuse, inability to use, or reliance upon the information contained herein, nor does either warrant or otherwise represent in any way the accuracy, adequacy, efficacy, or applicability of the contents hereof. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Environmental Protection Agency wishes to acknowledge the assistance and input provided by the following advisors in the preparation of this guidance document: Rodger Ames, National Park Service, Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere (CIRA); Shao-Hang Chu, USEPA; Rich Damberg, USEPA; Tammy Eagan, Florida Dept. of Environmental Protection; Neil Frank, USEPA; Eric Ginsburg, USEPA; Dennis Haddow, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Ann Hess, Colorado State University; Hari Iyer, Dept. of Statistics, Colorado State University; Mike Koerber, Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium; Bill Leenhouts, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; William Malm, National Park Service (CIRA); Debbie Miller, National Park Service; Tom Moore , Western Regional Air Partnership; Janice Peterson, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; Marc Pitchford, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Air Resources Laboratory; Rich Poirot, State of Vermont, Dept.
  • Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico

    Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico

    Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico William H. Romme, M. Lisa Floyd, David Hanna with contributions by Elisabeth J. Bartlett, Michele Crist, Dan Green, Henri D. Grissino-Mayer, J. Page Lindsey, Kevin McGarigal, & Jeffery S.Redders Produced by the Colorado Forest Restoration Institute at Colorado State University, and Region 2 of the U.S. Forest Service May 12, 2009 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY … p 5 AUTHORS’ AFFILIATIONS … p 16 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS … p 16 CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION A. Objectives and Organization of This Report … p 17 B. Overview of Physical Geography and Vegetation … p 19 C. Climate Variability in Space and Time … p 21 1. Geographic Patterns in Climate 2. Long-Term Variability in Climate D. Reference Conditions: Concept and Application … p 25 1. Historical Range of Variability (HRV) Concept 2. The Reference Period for this Analysis 3. Human Residents and Influences during the Reference Period E. Overview of Integrated Ecosystem Management … p 30 F. Literature Cited … p 34 CHAPTER II. PONDEROSA PINE FORESTS A. Vegetation Structure and Composition … p 39 B. Reference Conditions … p 40 1. Reference Period Fire Regimes 2. Other agents of disturbance 3. Pre-1870 stand structures C. Legacies of Euro-American Settlement and Current Conditions … p 67 1. Logging (“High-Grading”) in the Late 1800s and Early 1900s 2. Excessive Livestock Grazing in the Late 1800s and Early 1900s 3. Fire Exclusion Since the Late 1800s 4. Interactions: Logging, Grazing, Fire, Climate, and the Forests of Today D. Summary … p 83 E. Literature Cited … p 84 CHAPTER III.
  • District Court, Water Division 6, Colorado

    District Court, Water Division 6, Colorado

    DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIV. 6, COLORADO TO ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN WATER APPLICATIONS IN WATER DIV. 6 Pursuant to C.R.S. 37-92-302, you are hereby notified that the following pages comprise a resume of Applications and Amended Applications filed in the office of Water DIV. 6, during the month of August, 2008. 1. 08CW3 (00CW60, 81CW200) JACKSON COUNTY Amended Application for Finding of Diligence and to Make Absolute. Walden Reservoir Co., c/o Stanley W. Cazier or John D. Walker, P.O. Box 500, Granby, CO 80446 970-887-3376. Name of structure: Walden Reservoir (Old S.C. Ditch Enlargement and Extension). Describe conditional water right (as to each structure) giving the following from the Referee’s Ruling and Judgment and Decree: Date of Original Decree: October 14, 1982. Case No: 81CW200 Court: Water Division No. 6. Location and legal description for the structures are: Walden Reservoir: The outlet is located 50 feet West of the East Section line and 2150 feet North of the South Section line of Section 19, T9N, R79W of the 6th P.M. Old S.C. Ditch: Headgate is located at a point on the West Bank of the Michigan River whence the 1/4 Corner between Sections 17 & 18, T8N, R78W of the 6th P.M., bears North 72 degrees, 05 minutes West a distance of 3483 feet. Point of diversion from Old S.C. Ditch to Illinois River Basin: Point of diversion bears South 88 degrees, 43 minutes West, 4283 feet from the East 1/4 Corner of Section 34, T9N, R79W, of the 6th P.M.
  • COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail

    COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail

    CONTINENTAL DIVIDE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL DAY & OVERNIGHT HIKES: COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail THE CENTENNIAL STATE The Colorado Rockies are the quintessential CDT experience! The CDT traverses 800 miles of these majestic and challenging peaks dotted with abandoned homesteads and ghost towns, and crosses the ancestral lands of the Ute, Eastern Shoshone, and Cheyenne peoples. The CDT winds through some of Colorado’s most incredible landscapes: the spectacular alpine tundra of the South San Juan, Weminuche, and La Garita Wildernesses where the CDT remains at or above 11,000 feet for nearly 70 miles; remnants of the late 1800’s ghost town of Hancock that served the Alpine Tunnel; the awe-inspiring Collegiate Peaks near Leadville, the highest incorporated city in America; geologic oddities like The Window, Knife Edge, and Devil’s Thumb; the towering 14,270 foot Grays Peak – the highest point on the CDT; Rocky Mountain National Park with its rugged snow-capped skyline; the remote Never Summer Wilderness; and the broad valleys and numerous glacial lakes and cirques of the Mount Zirkel Wilderness. You might also encounter moose, mountain goats, bighorn sheep, marmots, and pika on the CDT in Colorado. In this guide, you’ll find Colorado’s best day and overnight hikes on the CDT, organized south to north. ELEVATION: The average elevation of the CDT in Colorado is 10,978 ft, and all of the hikes listed in this guide begin at elevations above 8,000 ft. Remember to bring plenty of water, sun protection, and extra food, and know that a hike at elevation will likely be more challenging than the same distance hike at sea level.
  • Appendix C - Roadless Areas

    Appendix C - Roadless Areas

    Appendix C - Roadless Areas Purpose The purpose of this appendix is to describe roadless areas and the analysis factors used in evaluating individual roadless areas on the Routt National Forest. It includes a description of the physical and biological features, primitive recreation and education opportunities, resources, and present management situation for each area. Background Roadless Area Review and Evaluation In 1970, the Forest Service studied all administratively designated primitive areas and inventoried and reviewed all roadless areas in the National Forest System greater than 5,000 acres. This study was known as the Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE). RARE was halted in 1972 due to legal challenge. RARE identified 711,043 acres of roadless area on the Routt National Forest. In 1977, the Forest Service began another nation-wide Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE II) to identify roadless and undeveloped areas within the National Forest System that were suitable for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System. Twenty nine areas, totalling 566,756 acres, were inventoried on the Routt National Forest (including the Middle Park Ranger District of the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest). As a result of RARE II, four areas on the forest - Williams Fork, St. Louis Peak, Service Creek, and Davis Peak - were administratively designated as Further Planning Areas (FPA). This further planning area designation meant that more information was needed before the Forest Service would recommend any of these areas to Congress for wilderness designation. In January 1979, the Forest Service issued nationally a Final Environmental Impact Statement documenting a review of 62 million acres of roadless and undeveloped areas within the 191-million-acre National Forest System.
  • AN ANALYSIS Jing Zhi Wong* ABSTRACT

    AN ANALYSIS Jing Zhi Wong* ABSTRACT

    27 (2) 2019 IIUMLJ 397 - 446 TOWARDS ENFORCEABLE STANDARDS, RULES AND RIGHTS IN STRATA MANAGEMENT: AN ANALYSIS Jing Zhi Wong* ABSTRACT The Strata Management Act 2013 (Act 757) and the Strata Titles Act 1985 (Act 318) confer broad powers on strata communities to self-manage and self-regulate through body corporates (termed Strata Management Bodies). The policy behind these legislations promotes maximum autonomy and self-regulatory powers for Strata Management Bodies to, through their internal rule-making and decision-making processes, govern themselves in ways that best suit their needs and interests. Consequently, judicial and administrative recognition of Strata Management Bodies’ autonomy has left a lacuna of matters which are not justiciable by the Courts and/or the Strata Management Tribunal. This adversely affects homeowners’ ability to access substantive justice. This article, through doctrinal analyses of key Malaysian and Western Australian cases, sheds light on a selection of strata disputes illustrating the inadequacies of the law on strata title and strata management, and the lack of enforceable standards of good management practices. The article also explores how the apathetic application of general principles of company law to strata management bodies has left a lacuna of non-justiciability. Consequently, this article argues the case for strata law reform. It advocates for law reform that promulgate standards, rules and rights of good strata management as enforceable law, rather than mere general, high-level, unenforceable and unjusticiable principles. Keywords: Strata Management, Management Corporation, Common Property, Rights, Corporations, Malaysia, Western Australia. * JD Candidate, Law School, The University of Western Australia. Email: [email protected].
  • CONSOLIDATED STRATA PROPERTY ACT and STRATA PROPERTY AMENDMENT ACT, 1999

    CONSOLIDATED STRATA PROPERTY ACT and STRATA PROPERTY AMENDMENT ACT, 1999

    CONSOLIDATED STRATA PROPERTY ACT and STRATA PROPERTY AMENDMENT ACT, 1999 Strata Property Act (except section 72(2)(b)), Strata Property Amendment Act and Strata Property Regulation are brought into force effective July 1, 2000. This consolidation of the Strata Property Act (the "Act") and the Strata Property Amendment Act (the "SPAA") has been produced and consolidated for convenience only. Every effort has been made to ensure accuracy and completeness of the material, however Lawson Lundell Lawson & McIntosh does not guarantee its legal accuracy and does not accept responsibility for loss and inconvenience suffered by users as a result of inaccuracies. Please be advised that this material is not admissible in a court of law in accordance with the Evidence Act. For such purposes official Queen's Printer copies of acts and regulations must be obtained. The amendments contained in the SPAA are set out in italics with a reference to the SPAA section set out in [square brackets] immediately following the amendment. The consolidated Act includes cross-references to the Strata Property Act Regulations. Where the Act includes a prescribed form, reference to the form is included in{parenthesis}. HER MAJESTY, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly of the Province of British Columbia, enacts as follows: PART 1 - DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION -- s. 1 Definitions and interpretation -- s. 1 1 (1) In this Act: "approving officer" means an appropriate approving officer appointed under the Land Title Act [amendment SPAA s1];
  • Geology and Coal Resources Op North Park, Colorado

    Geology and Coal Resources Op North Park, Colorado

    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIBECTOR' 596 GEOLOGY AND COAL RESOURCES OP NORTH PARK, COLORADO BY A. L. BEEKLY WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1915 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction _ ______ _,___________ 7 Location and area__ _ _ _____. __________1___ 7 Accessibility_________________________________ 8 Explorations in the region________________________ 8 Preparation of the map___________________________ 10 Base map_.______________________________ 10 ' Field work_______________________________ 10 Office work______________._________ __ 11 Acknowledgments_______________________________ 11 Geography ______________ ______________________ 12 Relief______________________________________ 12 Major features..____________.________________ 12 Medicine Bow Range_______.________ ______ 12 Park Range____________________________ 13 Continental Divide____________.___________ 13 Floor of the park____________ '._.___________ 13 Minor features________________:_. ______ 14 Drainage___________________ ______________ 16 Settlement__________i_______________________ 18 Stratigraphy __________ __________.___________ 19 Sedimentary rocks ______________________________ 19 Age and correlation.. ______!____ .___________ 19 Geologic section________________._________'_ 20 Carboniferous (?) system_______________________ 21 Pennsylvanfan or Permian (?) series______________ 21 Distribution and character_____.___________ 21 Stratigraphic relations________.___________ 21 Fossils_____________________________ 22 Triassic (?)