Water and Anion Transport in Electrochemical Devices Travis Omasta University of Connecticut - Storrs, [email protected]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Water and Anion Transport in Electrochemical Devices Travis Omasta University of Connecticut - Storrs, Travis.Omasta@Uconn.Edu University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Doctoral Dissertations University of Connecticut Graduate School 5-4-2018 Water and Anion Transport in Electrochemical Devices Travis Omasta University of Connecticut - Storrs, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations Recommended Citation Omasta, Travis, "Water and Anion Transport in Electrochemical Devices" (2018). Doctoral Dissertations. 1808. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations/1808 Water and Anion Transport in Electrochemical Devices Travis John Omasta, Ph.D. University of Connecticut, 2018 In this thesis, the balance and transport of water, hydroxide, and carbonates in Anion Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells (AEMFCs) are investigated. First, macro-scale water is examined, and the need for high membrane conductivity, a predictor of water back diffusion, is demonstrated by operating at lower relative humidities to avoid catalyst layer flooding. Additionally, the distribution of water in the membrane, electrodes, and gas diffusion layers was directly imaged with neutron radiography in an operando fuel cell. The insight from the neutron images was combined with electrode diagnostics evaluating the kinetic, ohmic, and mass transport limitations of the cell, resulting in the ability to also control the micro- scale water through precise engineering of the anode catalyst layer. This understanding ultimately led to the ability reduce the Pt loading significantly, as well as use non-Pt catalysts, while still achieving > 1 W cm-2. Finally, the effects of CO2 and carbonation on AEMFCs was investigated, and the mechanism for carbonate inclusion in the AEM and removal are discussed. It was observed that the carbonation/decarbonation dynamics could allow for the purposeful use of carbonates in electrochemical devices, including current driven electrochemical CO2 separation, which were assembled and their performance characterized. Water and Anion Transport in Electrochemical Devices Travis John Omasta B.S., University of Connecticut, 2006 M.S., University of Connecticut, 2017 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Connecticut 2018 APPROVAL PAGE Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Water and Anion Transport in Electrochemical Devices Presented by Travis John Omasta, B.S., M.S. Major Advisor ___________________________________________________________________ William E. Mustain Associate Advisor ___________________________________________________________________ Radenka Maric Associate Advisor ___________________________________________________________________ Jeffrey McCutcheon Associate Advisor ___________________________________________________________________ Ugur Pasaogullari Associate Advisor ___________________________________________________________________ Yu Lei University of Connecticut 2018 ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The number of people that I am indebted to for support and guidance through my journey to earn my PhD is significant, and without them this achievement would not have been possible. First, I must express my most sincere appreciation to my advisor. Dr. William Mustain, who’s guidance through my early failures and ultimate successes helped to shape the scientist I am today. More than expertise in electrochemistry, Bill guided me to hone the problem-solving approach that defines a Ph.D. researcher, and I honestly could not have asked for a better balance of strict motivation and friendly understanding through all the difficulties inherent to earning a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering. Also vital to my success, was my family, for their unwavering support and understanding through the most stressful times, which happened often over the 5+ years I was back in school. It was not easy to return to UConn after graduating 6 years prior, and my parents, sisters, bother-in-laws, and nieces and nephews always knew how to bring a smile to my face when I needed it most, and I can’t wait to spend more time with them after graduation. A heartfelt thank you to Pete Menard and Garry Barnes for their technical expertise in setting up equipment and experiments, and for helping keep me sane by always making me laugh with random jokes/wisecracks. I would also like to thank Mark Drobney at Tech Services for always being willing to work with me in whatever crazy design I was trying to accomplish, including the wilds task of building a plexiglass submersible for a demo to use in my fluid dynamics class. Additionally, I owe Carol Stork, at the University of South Carolina significant iii gratitude, without her knowledge of all things USC and Swearingen, I would never have been able to pull off the renovation of the Mustain lab at USC and overcome the “southern pace” of South Carolina. I am also extremely grateful for the many collaborators that I have worked closely with during my graduate career, especially Dr. Bryan Pivovar, Dr. John Varcoe, Dr. Jacob LaManna, and Dr. Michael Zuraw; and my associate advisors: Dr. Brian Willis, Dr. Ugur Pasaogullari, Dr. Jeffrey McCutcheon, Dr. Yu Lei, and Dr. Radenka Maric, all of whom have contributed to my knowledge and growth. I would like to acknowledge my lab mates: Neil Spinner, Greg Crettol, Sujan Shrestha, Ying Liu, Shuai Zhao, Derek Chhiv, Mengchen Liu, Ehsan Faegh, Ben Ng, Xinyi Zhao, Yiwei Zheng and Emanuele Magliocca for their collaboration and friendship. I would like to especially thank Connor Lewis, who and contributed invaluably to my experiments, as an undergrad researcher, and as a friend. I also owe significant appreciation to Xiong Peng, who was side by side with me through a large portion of the journey, and many of our best ideas came from going back and forth on a multitude of topics. Finally, I can’t say enough about Alex Palmieri, my lab mate, my friend, and my part time roommate. Especially in the move to South Carolina, his friendship was invaluable and simpatico. Lastly, I would like to thank all my friends, new and old, from Danbury, UConn undergrad, and developed during my graduate studies at UConn – through ChEGSA, softball, and classes – for their support, visits, and mostly for the distractions from the stress of the program. Be it a visit to UConn, a brewery, a ski trip, a softball game, a beer, a run, lunch or a Dunkin run, it was always appreciated. iv Dedicated to the memory of my nephew Nathan William Lounsbury (2012-2013). May his brief time with us be a constant reminder to cherish the time we have and strive to be the best versions of ourselves. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS..................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................... xi LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................. xii CHAPTER 1: Introduction ................................................................................. 1 1.1. Significance ..................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Background ..................................................................................................... 5 1.2.1. Historical Context for Alkaline Fuel Cells ........................................................... 5 1.2.2. Carbonation Limitations for AFCs and AEMFCs ................................................. 9 1.2.3. Competition with Acidic Fuel Cells ................................................................... 15 1.3. The Properties of AEMs and Their Influence on Water Transport in AEMFCs.... 19 1.3.1. Role of Physical Properties in Determining Membrane and Water Behavior.. 19 1.3.2. Understanding the Water Content and Balance in AEMFCs ........................... 20 1.3.3. AEMFC Performance with Conductivity, Back Diffusion, and Water Control .. 23 1.4. AEMFC Catalyst and Electrode Improvements and Limitations ........................ 28 1.4.1. The Impact of Electrode Design on AEMFC Water .......................................... 28 1.4.2. Reducing PGM and Eliminating Pt in the AEMFC Electrode ............................ 30 1.5. Emergence and Impacts of Carbonate Anions in AEMFCs ................................ 31 1.5.1. Carbonate Influences on Cell Operation .......................................................... 31 1.5.2. Electrochemical Carbonate Removal ............................................................... 34 vi 1.5.3. Possible Purposeful Utilization of Carbonates in AEM-based Systems ............ 35 1.6. Successes with “Commercial” AEMFC Systems ............................................... 38 CHAPTER 2: Importance of Balancing Membrane and Electrode Water in Anion Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells ..................................................................... 41 2.1. Experimental ................................................................................................. 42 2.1.1. AEM Synthesis and Characterization ............................................................... 42 2.1.2. Anion-Exchange Ionomer (AEI) Powder Synthesis ........................................... 44 2.1.3. Materials and Gas Diffusion Electrode (GDE) Preparation .............................. 47 2.1.4. MEA Assembly and Single-Cell AEMFC Testing ............................................... 48 2.2. Results and Discussion ................................................................................... 51 2.2.1. Cell
Recommended publications
  • Designing Polymer Electrolytes for Alkaline Anion
    DESIGNING POLYMER ELECTROLYTES FOR ALKALINE ANION EXCHANGE MEMBRANE FUEL CELLS A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Steve Sidi He May 2015 © 2015 by Steve Sidi He. All Rights Reserved. Re-distributed by Stanford University under license with the author. This dissertation is online at: http://purl.stanford.edu/wh023dj3361 ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Curtis Frank, Primary Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Thomas Jaramillo I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Andrew Spakowitz Approved for the Stanford University Committee on Graduate Studies. Patricia J. Gumport, Vice Provost for Graduate Education This signature page was generated electronically upon submission of this dissertation in electronic format. An original signed hard copy of the signature page is on file in University Archives. iii Abstract Increasing global demand and dependence on fossil fuels, coupled with environmental concerns arising from their use, have sparked interest in alternative energy sources. Hydrogen-powered fuel cells are a promising solution, offering a clean, scalable method for energy production.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Membrane Properties on the Carbonation of Anion Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells
    membranes Article Effect of Membrane Properties on the Carbonation of Anion Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells Yiwei Zheng 1, Lyzmarie Nicole Irizarry Colón 1, Noor Ul Hassan 1, Eric R. Williams 2 , Morgan Stefik 2 , Jacob M. LaManna 3, Daniel S. Hussey 3 and William E. Mustain 1,* 1 Department of Chemical Engineering, Swearingen Engineering Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA; [email protected] (Y.Z.); [email protected] (L.N.I.C.); [email protected] (N.U.H.) 2 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA; [email protected] (E.R.W.); stefi[email protected] (M.S.) 3 National Institute for Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA; [email protected] (J.M.L.); [email protected] (D.S.H.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-803-576-6393 Abstract: Anion exchange membrane fuel cells (AEMFC) are potentially very low-cost replacements for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. However, AEMFCs suffer from one very serious drawback: significant performance loss when CO2 is present in the reacting oxidant gas (e.g., air) due to carbonation. Although the chemical mechanisms for how carbonation leads to voltage loss in operating AEMFCs are known, the way those mechanisms are affected by the properties of the anion exchange membrane (AEM) has not been elucidated. Therefore, this work studies AEMFC carbonation using numerous high-functioning AEMs from the literature and it was found that the ionic conductivity of the AEM plays the most critical role in the CO2-related voltage loss from Citation: Zheng, Y.; Irizarry Colón, carbonation, with the degree of AEM crystallinity playing a minor role.
    [Show full text]
  • High Durable PEK-Based Anion Exchange Membrane for Elevated Temperature Alkaline Fuel Cells
    Journal of Membrane Science 394–395 (2012) 193–201 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of Membrane Science jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/memsci High durable PEK-based anion exchange membrane for elevated temperature alkaline fuel cells ∗ Hadis Zarrin, Jason Wu, Michael Fowler, Zhongwei Chen Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Waterloo Institute for Nanotechnology, Waterloo Institute for Sustainable Energy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1 a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Highly durable quaternary ammonium polyetherketone hydroxide (QAPEK-OH) membranes were devel- Received 26 September 2011 oped for alkaline fuel cells operating at elevated temperatures via chloromethylation, quaternization and Received in revised form alkalinization method. The chemical reaction for chloromethylated polymer (CMPEK) was confirmed by 22 December 2011 1 nuclear magnetic resonance ( H NMR) and the QAPEK-OH membranes were characterized by Fourier Accepted 26 December 2011 transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). The thermal properties of the membranes were determined by Available online 31 December 2011 thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The ion-exchange capac- ity (IEC), water uptake, mechanical properties and anion conductivity of the QAPEK-OH membranes were Keywords: measured to evaluate their applicability in alkaline fuel cells at elevated temperature. The anionic con- Anion exchange membrane −4 −2 −1 ductivity of the QAPEK-OH membrane varied from 8 × 10 to 1.1 × 10 S cm over the temperature Alkaline fuel cell ◦ High durability range 20–100 C. The QAPEK-OH membrane showed excellent alkaline stability in 1 M KOH solution at ◦ High temperature 100 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Anion Exchange Membranes Applications in Fuel Cells
    Anion Exchange Membranes Applications in Fuel Cells Jake Ganley Group Meeting January 17, 2019 Fossil Fuels and the Promise of Hydrogen CnH2n+2 + O2 CO2 + H2O H2 + O2 H2O Jan 2003: President Bush’s Hydrogen Fuel Initiative commits a total of $1.7 billion to fuel cell R&D “…consumers will have the practical option of Sketch of William Grove’s 1839 fuel cell purchasing a competitively priced hydrogen published in The London and Edinburgh powered vehicle, and be able to refuel it near Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science their homes and places of work, by 2020.” -Secretary Abraham, Apr 2003 Paster, M. President’s Hydrogen Fuel Initiative. US Department of Energy, August 2005. Basics of a Hydrogen Fuel Cell Load + – – – Anode: H2 2H + 2e 4e 4e 2H2 O2 (Ea = 0 V vs SHE at 1 bar, 298.15 K) 0.5 O – + H O Cathode: 2 + 2e + 2H 2 4H+ (E = 1.23 V vs SHE at 1 bar, 298.15 K) c Anode Cathode Overall: H + 0.5 O H O 2 2 2 2H2O (Ecell = 1.23 V vs SHE at 1 bar, 298.15 K) Proton-Exchange Membrane • Common catalysts: Platinum and Platinum Group Metals (PGMs) • Common proton exchange membrane: Nafion Varcoe, J. R.; Slade, R. C. T. Prospects for alkaline anionexchange membranes in low temperature fuel cells. Fuel Cells 2005, 5, 187−200. Nafion: The Most Common PEM Nafion General Structure • Separated hydrophilic/hydrophobic microdomains facilitate ion transport F2 F2 C F C • Excessive water uptake reduces mechanical integrity C C F2 x • Nafion PEM’s have conductivities commonly >100 mS/cm, O CF2 O O depending on relative humidity F2 CF C S F3C O C O F y 2 Protons from on the sulfonic acid “hop” from one acidic site to the next • Introduced by DuPont in the 1960’s • Structurally based on Teflon (PTFE) Common traits of an effective Ion Exchange Membrane: (1) Good ionic conductivity, but low electronic conductivity (2) Low gas permeability (3) Resistant to swelling (4) High mechanical strength and integrity (5) High chemical stability Dicks, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen-Oxygen Fuel Cell Is the ‘Game Changer’
    November 11, 2019 Lumsa University, Rome The History Could Repeat Itself: Hydrogen-Oxygen Fuel Cell is the ‘Game Changer’ MiMario VlValen tino Romer i Independent Consultant, Italy OtliOutline ` The 50th anniversary of the moon landings ` ‘Hydrogen is today enjoying unprecedented momentum’ ` ‘Considering Hydrogen Fuel Cells Powertrain as Power Generation Plant’ ` From ‘Paris Agreement 1.5°C Perspective’ (IPCC SR15) to ‘Climate Emergency’ (Highlighted by Greta Thunberg) ` Three Icones of 2019: Greta Tunberg, Holy Father Francis and Ursula von der Leyen ` The History Could Repeat Itself: Hydrogen-Oxygen Fuel Cell is the ‘Game Changer’ © Mario Valentino Romeri – 4nd AIEE Energy Symposium - LUMSA University, Rome, December 11, 2019 2 2019: the 50th annifthldiiversary of the moon landings ` Saturday 20 July 2019 marked the 50th anniversary of the moon la nd ings ,,a an d whil e m osoost of usaeus are v eyery f amili ar with the iconic scenes of this ‘giant leap for mankind’, many of us are completely unaware that the hydrogen-oxygen fuel cell invention made Neil Armstrong’s ‘small step’ possible. ` “Without you, we would not have gotten to the moon” said President Richard Nixon to Francis Thomas Bacon, referring to Bacon’s invention of the first practical hydrogen-oxygen fuel cell. ` The Bacon fuel cell was perfect for powering NASA’s spacecraft: it was lighter and much less bulky than batteries of the time, it was more efficient than 1960’s solar panels, and hydrogen and oxygen were already going to be on board the ship for use as rocket fuel. What’ ssmore more, the only waste product from the reaction was water – needed on Apollo 11 for the astronauts to drink.
    [Show full text]
  • Alkaline Anion-Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells
    Review Cite This: Chem. Rev. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX pubs.acs.org/CR Alkaline Anion-Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells: Challenges in Electrocatalysis and Interfacial Charge Transfer † Nagappan Ramaswamy and Sanjeev Mukerjee* Northeastern University Center for Renewable Energy Technology, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, 317 Egan Research Center, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States ABSTRACT: Alkaline anion-exchange membrane (AAEM) fuel cells have attracted significant interest in the past decade, thanks to the recent developments in hydroxide- anion conductive membranes. In this article, we compare the performance of current state of the art AAEM fuel cells to proton-exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells and elucidate the sources of various overpotentials. While the continued development of highly conductive and thermally stable anion-exchange membranes is unambiguously a principal requirement, we attempt to put the focus on the challenges in electrocatalysis and interfacial charge transfer at an alkaline electrode/electrolyte interface. Specifically, a critical analysis presented here details the (i) fundamental causes for higher overpotential in hydrogen oxidation reaction, (ii) mechanistic aspects of oxygen reduction reaction, (iii) carbonate anion poisoning, (iv) unique challenges arising from the specific adsorption of alkaline ionomer cation-exchange head groups on electrocatalysts surfaces, and (v) the potential of alternative small molecule fuel oxidation. This review and analysis encompasses both the precious and nonprecious group metal based electrocatalysts from the perspective of various interfacial charge-transfer phenomena and reaction mechanisms. Finally, a research roadmap for further improvement in AAEM fuel cell performance is delineated here within the purview of electrocatalysis and interfacial charge transfer.
    [Show full text]
  • Battery Life and How to Improve It
    Battery Life and How To Improve It Battery and Energy Technologies Technologies Battery Life (and Death) Low Power Cells High Power Cells For product designers, an understanding of the factors affecting battery life is vitally important for managing both product Chargers & Charging performance and warranty liabilities particularly with high cost, high power batteries. Offer too low a warranty period and you won't Battery Management sell any batteries/products. Overestimate the battery lifetime and you could lose a fortune. Battery Testing Cell Chemistries FAQ That batteries have a finite life is due to occurrence of the unwanted chemical or physical changes to, or the loss of, the active materials of which Free Report they are made. Otherwise they would last indefinitely. These changes are usually irreversible and they affect the electrical performance of the cell. Buying Batteries in China Battery life can usually only be extended by preventing or reducing the cause of the unwanted parasitic chemical effects which occur in the cells. Choosing a Battery Some ways of improving battery life and hence reliability are considered below. How to Specify Batteries Battery cycle life is defined as the number of complete charge - discharge cycles a battery can perform before its nominal capacity falls below Sponsors 80% of its initial rated capacity. Lifetimes of 500 to 1200 cycles are typical. The actual ageing process results in a gradual reduction in capacity over time. When a cell reaches its specified lifetime it does not stop working suddenly. The ageing process continues at the same rate as before so that a cell whose capacity had fallen to 80% after 1000 cycles will probably continue working to perhaps 2000 cycles when its effective capacity will have fallen to 60% of its original capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Fuel Cell - Wikipedia 1 of 36
    Fuel cell - Wikipedia 1 of 36 Fuel cell A fuel cell is an electrochemical cell that converts the chemical energy of a fuel (often hydrogen) and an oxidizing agent (often oxygen[1]) into electricity through a pair of redox reactions.[2] Fuel cells are different from most batteries in requiring a continuous source of fuel and oxygen (usually from air) to sustain the chemical reaction, whereas in a battery the chemical energy usually comes from metals and their ions or oxides[3] that are commonly already present in the battery, except in flow batteries. Fuel cells can produce electricity continuously for as long as fuel and oxygen are supplied. The first fuel cells were invented by Sir William Grove in 1838. The first commercial use of fuel cells came more than a century later following the invention of the hydrogen–oxygen fuel cell by Francis Thomas Bacon in 1932. The alkaline fuel cell, also known as the Bacon fuel cell after its inventor, has been used in NASA space programs since the mid-1960s to Demonstration model of a direct- generate power for satellites and space capsules. Since then, methanol fuel cell (black layered cube) in fuel cells have been used in many other applications. Fuel its enclosure. cells are used for primary and backup power for commercial, industrial and residential buildings and in remote or inaccessible areas. They are also used to power fuel cell vehicles, including forklifts, automobiles, buses, boats, motorcycles and submarines. There are many types of fuel cells, but they all consist of an anode, a cathode, and an electrolyte that allows ions, often positively charged hydrogen ions (protons), to move between the two sides of the fuel cell.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing Anion Exchange Membranes for CO2 Electrolysers
    REVIEW ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00761-x Designing anion exchange membranes for CO2 electrolysers Danielle A. Salvatore 1,12, Christine M. Gabardo 2,12, Angelica Reyes 1,12, Colin P. O’Brien 2,12, Steven Holdcroft 3, Peter Pintauro 4, Bamdad Bahar5, Michael Hickner 6, Chulsung Bae7, David Sinton 2, Edward H. Sargent 8 and Curtis P. Berlinguette 1,9,10,11 ✉ New technologies are required to electrocatalytically convert carbon dioxide (CO2) into fuels and chemicals at near-ambient temperatures and pressures more effectively. One particular challenge is mediating the electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) at low cell voltages while maintaining high conversion efficiencies. Anion exchange membranes (AEMs) in zero-gap reactors offer promise in this direction; however, there remain substantial obstacles to be overcome in tailoring the membranes and other cell components to the requirements of CO2RR systems. Here we review recent advances, and remaining challenges, in AEM materials and devices for CO2RR. We discuss the principles underpinning AEM operation and the properties desired for CO2RR, in addition to reviewing state-of-the-art AEMs in CO2 electrolysers. We close with future design strategies to minimize product crossover, improve mechanical and chemical stability, and overcome the energy losses associated with the use of AEMs for CO2RR systems. global effort seeks to design electrochemical reactors that AEMs transport anions from a basic cathode to the anode. BPMs + selectively reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) at high
    [Show full text]
  • Optimization for Fuel Cells and Electrolyzers
    membranes Article Design Strategies for Alkaline Exchange Membrane–Electrode Assemblies: Optimization for Fuel Cells and Electrolyzers Aviv Ashdot 1,2, Mordechai Kattan 1, Anna Kitayev 1,2, Ervin Tal-Gutelmacher 1, Alina Amel 1,* and Miles Page 1,* 1 Hydrolite Ltd., 2 Hatochen St., Caesaria 38900, Israel; [email protected] (A.A.); [email protected] (M.K.); [email protected] (A.K.); [email protected] (E.T.-G.) 2 Department of Chemistry, Bar Ilan Institute of Technology and Advanced Materials (BINA), Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan 52900, Israel * Correspondence: [email protected] (A.A.); [email protected] (M.P.) Abstract: Production of hydrocarbon-based, alkaline exchange, membrane–electrode assemblies (MEA’s) for fuel cells and electrolyzers is examined via catalyst-coated membrane (CCM) and gas- diffusion electrode (GDE) fabrication routes. The inability effectively to hot-press hydrocarbon-based ion-exchange polymers (ionomers) risks performance limitations due to poor interfacial contact, especially between GDE and membrane. The addition of an ionomeric interlayer is shown greatly to improve the intimacy of contact between GDE and membrane, as determined by ex situ through-plane MEA impedance measurements, indicated by a strong decrease in the frequency of the high-frequency zero phase angle of the complex impedance, and confirmed in situ with device performance tests. The best interfacial contact is achieved with CCM’s, with the contact impedance decreasing, and device performance increasing, in the order GDE >> GDE+Interlayer > CCM. The GDE+interlayer Citation: Ashdot, A.; Kattan, M.; fabrication approach is further examined with respect to hydrogen crossover and alkaline membrane Kitayev, A.; Tal-Gutelmacher, E.; Amel, A.; Page, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Selectivity of Transport Processes in Ion-Exchange Membranes: Relationship with the Structure and Methods for Its Improvement
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Selectivity of Transport Processes in Ion-Exchange Membranes: Relationship with the Structure and Methods for Its Improvement Irina Stenina 1, Daniel Golubenko 1, Victor Nikonenko 2 and Andrey Yaroslavtsev 1,* 1 Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the RAS, 119991 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] (I.S.); [email protected] (D.G.) 2 Membrane Institute, Kuban State University, 350040 Krasnodar, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 13 July 2020; Accepted: 30 July 2020; Published: 1 August 2020 Abstract: Nowadays, ion-exchange membranes have numerous applications in water desalination, electrolysis, chemistry, food, health, energy, environment and other fields. All of these applications require high selectivity of ion transfer, i.e., high membrane permselectivity. The transport properties of ion-exchange membranes are determined by their structure, composition and preparation method. For various applications, the selectivity of transfer processes can be characterized by different parameters, for example, by the transport number of counterions (permselectivity in electrodialysis) or by the ratio of ionic conductivity to the permeability of some gases (crossover in fuel cells). However, in most cases there is a correlation: the higher the flux density of the target component through the membrane, the lower the selectivity of the process. This correlation has two aspects: first, it follows from the membrane material properties, often expressed as the trade-off between membrane permeability and permselectivity; and, second, it is due to the concentration polarization phenomenon, which increases with an increase in the applied driving force. In this review, both aspects are considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Anion-Exchange Membranes in Electrochemical Energy Systems† Cite This: Energy Environ
    Energy & Environmental Science View Article Online PERSPECTIVE View Journal | View Issue Anion-exchange membranes in electrochemical energy systems† Cite this: Energy Environ. Sci.,2014,7, 3135 John R. Varcoe,*a Plamen Atanassov,b Dario R. Dekel,c Andrew M. Herring,d Michael A. Hickner,e Paul. A. Kohl,f Anthony R. Kucernak,g William E. Mustain,h Kitty Nijmeijer,i Keith Scott,j Tongwen Xuk and Lin Zhuangl This article provides an up-to-date perspective on the use of anion-exchange membranes in fuel cells, electrolysers, redox flow batteries, reverse electrodialysis cells, and bioelectrochemical systems (e.g. microbial fuel cells). The aim is to highlight key concepts, misconceptions, the current state-of-the-art, Received 27th April 2014 technological and scientific limitations, and the future challenges (research priorities) related to the use Accepted 4th August 2014 of anion-exchange membranes in these energy technologies. All the references that the authors DOI: 10.1039/c4ee01303d deemed relevant, and were available on the web by the manuscript submission date (30th April 2014), are www.rsc.org/ees included. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. Broader context Many electrochemical devices utilise ion-exchange membranes. Many systems such as fuel cells, electrolysers and redox ow batteries have traditionally used proton-/cation-exchange membranes (that conduct positive charged ions such as H+ or Na+). Prior wisdom has led to the general perception that anion-exchange membranes (that conduct negatively charged ions) have too low conductivities and chemical stabilities (especially in high pH systems) for application in such technologies. However, over the last decade or so, developments have highlighted that these are not always signicant problems and that anion-exchange À membranes can have OH conductivities that are approaching the levels of H+ conductivity observed in low pH proton-exchange membrane equivalents.
    [Show full text]