DOCSLIB.ORG

Butterflies and Plants: a Phylogenetic Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Butterflies and Plants: a Phylogenetic Study Etoluriotr.52(2).1 991{p. p. .113560 2 BUTTERFLIES AND PLANTS: A PHYLOGENETIC STUDY Nrxl,qs J,qNzrR Nn SOnENN yr-rN Departntenrt tf Zoologt',U nit,ersityo J Stockholn,1 06 91 StockholmS, wedert IE -ntail : niklas.jan z.@z .oolog i. su.s e Abstract.-A database on host plant records frorn 437 ingroup taxa has been used to test a number of hypotheses on the interaction between butterflies and their host plants using phylogenetic methods (sirnple character optinrization. concentrated changes test, and independent contrasts test). The butterfly phylogeny was assembled from various s()urces irnd host plant clades were identified according to Chase et al.'s rbcJ--basedp hylogeny. The ancestral host plant appears to be associated within a highly derived rosid clade, including the family Fabaceae. As fossil data suggest that this clade is older than the butterflies, they must have colonized already diversilied plants. Previous studies also suggest that the patterns of association in most insect-plant interirctions are more shaped by host shifts, through colonization and specialization. than by cospeciation. Consequently, we have focused explicitly on the mechanisms behind host shilis. Our results confirm, in the light of new phylogenetic evidence, the pattern reported by Ehrlich and Raven that related butterflies feed on related plants. We show that host shifts have generally been rnore comrnon between closely related plants than between nore distantly related plants. This finding. together with the possibility ofa highertendency of recolonizing ancestral hosts, helps to explain the apparent large-scale conservation in the patterns of association between insects and their host plants, patterns which at the same tinle are more flexible on a more detailed level. Plant growth form '*'as an even more conservative aspect of the interaction between butterflies and their host plants than plant phylogeny. However, this is largely explained by a higher probability of colonizations and host shifts while 1'eedingo n trees than on other growth fonns. Ke\, words.-Coevolution, host shifts, insect-host plant interactions, Lepidoptera. Papilionoidea. specialization. Received March 22, 1996. Accepted November 2.6, 1991 Few systems have played such an important role in our butterfly fossil dates back to 48 M.Y.B.P and the diversifi- understanding of how species interactions evolve as butter- cation of the butterfly families probably took place at the end flies and their host plants. To a large extent this is the result of the Cretaceous,a bout 66 M.Y.B.P (Emmel et al. 1992). of a single influential paper by Ehrlich and Raven (196.1). At least some families even in the most recently derived of Their essay inspired a flood of paperi on difl'erent aspectso f the plant clades used in this analysis date to this time, such this association, and a number of related hypotheses on the as, Urticaceae( a member of Rosid I in Chase et al., 1993): evolution of insect-plant interactions have emerged. How- 90 M.Y.B.P.,R utaceae( Rosid 2): 52 M.Y.B.P.,A piaceae( As- ever, there have been few attempts to exploit the large da- terid 2): 52 M.Y.B.P., Apocynaceae( Asterid l): 60 M.Y.B.P. tabase on butterfly-host plant affiliations to test such hy- (dates fiom Eriksson and Bremer 1992). Therefore, the clades potheses using phylogenetic methods (Mitter and Brooks themselves must be even older. It is reasonable to regard the 1983; Miller 1987a). A major reason for this is that well- evolution ofcurrent associationsa s arising generallyt hrough supported phylogenies. fbr both butterflies and seed plants, butterfly colonization of already-diversified hosts, and that have been unavailable.H owever, this is slowly changing,a nd is the approach we shall take. This is not to say that coevo- today it is possible to put together reasonably robust phy- lution is an unimportant process in the interaction between logenies for both groups. Chase et al. (1993) have recently butterflies and their host plants. only that evidence fbr it published a molecular phylogeny for all seed plants, which should be sought at other levels of resolution. is probably the best estimate of large-scale angiosperm phy- There are two fundamentally different approachest o com- logeny to date. Butterfly phylogenies are also emerging and parative analyses using phylogenetic data. One approach we have constructed a plausible phylogeny across the but- seeks to find and explain general ecological or evolutionary terflies by combining these published estimates. correlations( Felsenstein1 985; Grafen 1989; Harvey and Pa- Ehrlich and Raven ( I 964) argued that the patterns of host gel 1991: Pagel 1992), while the other seekst o reconstruct plant association that we observe today have been shaped by and explain particularh istoricale ventso r sequenceso f events a stepwise coevolutionary process in which plants evolve along branches in a phylogeny (Mitter and Brooks 1983: defensesa gainst natural enemies,a nd these enemies in turn Coddington l98U; Sill6n-Tullberg 1988; Maddison 1990, evolve new capacitiest o cope with thesed efenses.P lantst hat Brooks and Mclennan l99l). These approachesa re com- escapef iom herbivores can diversify in the absenceo l'en- plernentary (Coddington 1994; Nylin and Wedell 199,1;P agel emies.I nsectst hat eventually managet o colonize one ol'these 1994) and we have in the presentp aper used both, depending plants will enter a new adaptivez one and can in turn diversify on the prcblem. onto the relatives ol' this plant, becauset hey will be chem- The question of ancestral host associationsi s a clearly ically similar. Ehrlich and Raven argued that thesep rocesses historical problem. On what plant did the first butterfly feed'/ have led to the main pattern they had observed,n amely that This question is interesting in its own right, but answering related butterflies tend to f'eed on related groups of plants. it also provides necessary information for any phylogenetic Most or all plant diversificatir)nu p to the level of resolution tests regarding direction of evolution of host plant associa- used in our analysis had probribly already taken place at the tions. Ehrlich and Raven (1964) regardedi t most likely that time the butterflies started to diversify. The oldest known the ancestral host plant family was Aristolochiaceae. ln con- 486 1 - il 9 9 l J T h c -S o c i c t l ,l i r r t h c S t r " r dov l ' E , r o l u t i o n .A l l r i g h t s r c s c r v c d B U T T E R F L I E S A N D P L A N T S 487 trast, Scott (1986) noted that Fabaceae were eaten by the Are patternso f butterflyh ost plant utilizationn onrandoms o most basal branches of several butterfly families and sug- that relatedb utterfliesf eed on relatedp lants,a s suggestedb y gested that the ancestral host probably was a legume. More Ehrlich and Raven?( 2) What was the ancestralh ost plant recently, Ackery (1991) suggestedt hat Malvales may instead associationa, nd has this associationc onstrainedh ost plant be lhe anceslralh ost association. utilizationi n butterflies?(3 ) Are hosts hiftsi nvolving closely Ehrlich and Raven (1964) noted several factors influencing relatedp lant speciesm ore common than shifts to more dis- the association between butterflies and their host plants, but tantly related plants'?( 4) Are there idenrifiableg roups of particularly stressedt he importance of the plant's secondary unrelatedp lants that often occur togethera s hosts?( 5) Is metabolic substances.T hey noted that many higher taxa of plant phylogenya morec onservativea specto fbutterfly-plant plants are characterized by distinctive secondary chemistry, associationsth an plant growth fbrm, or vice versa?( 6) Are and cited a number of examples in which related butterflies major host shiftsm ore commoni n woody-plant-feedingth an feed on related plants. They also cited examples where related in herb-f'eedinglin eages?( 7) Are tree-feedingb utterflyt axa butterflies are t'eeding on unrelated plants with chemical sim- associatedw ith a largern umbero f host plant cladest han are ilarities. These observations are consistent with, though not herb-feedingt axa? sufficient to demonstrate, the importance of plant chemistry. However, nobody has tried to determine whether and at what MErnoos taxonomic scales the tendency to feed on related plants is Unlesso therwises tated,a ll analysesh aveb eenc arriedo ut statistically demonstrable for butterflies as a whole, as op- usingt hec omputerp rogramM acClade( vers. posed to selected examples. 3.05,M addison and Maddison 1992). Although plant chemistry has been viewed as the prime factor governing the evolution of butterfly-host plant asso- Phylogenies ciations (e.g. Feeny 1915, 1976, l99l; Jermy 1916, 1984 Scriber and Slansky 1981: Berenbaum 1983; Zangerl and The plant phylogenyu sedi n this study follows the rbcl- Berenbaum 1993; Fiedler 1995b), other aspects of the host, baseda nalysiso f seed plant relationshipsb y Chase et al. not necessarily well correlated with phylogeny, might also (1993).T hey perfbrmedt wo diff'erents earchesu sings lightly have a large eff'ect (Benson et al. 1975; Smiley 1978; Price different taxon sampling and weighting procedures.T hese et al. 1980; Courtney 1984; Bernays and Graham 1988; An- searchesp roducedv ery similart rees.W e havef br the present derson 1993). One example is host growth form. Different analysisu sedt he treep roducedb y their search2 (or treeB ), growth forms can dominate in different habitat types, which which they judged to be the most reliable.C hasee t al. sum- have distinct combinations of microclimate, enemies, etc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks Bioblitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 ON THIS PAGE Photograph of BioBlitz participants conducting data entry into iNaturalist. Photograph courtesy of the National Park Service. ON THE COVER Photograph of BioBlitz participants collecting aquatic species data in the Presidio of San Francisco. Photograph courtesy of National Park Service. The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 Elizabeth Edson1, Michelle O’Herron1, Alison Forrestel2, Daniel George3 1Golden Gate Parks Conservancy Building 201 Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94129 2National Park Service. Golden Gate National Recreation Area Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1061 Sausalito, CA 94965 3National Park Service. San Francisco Bay Area Network Inventory & Monitoring Program Manager Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1063 Sausalito, CA 94965 March 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Biolphilately Vol-64 No-3
    BIOPHILATELY OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE BIOLOGY UNIT OF ATA MARCH 2020 VOLUME 69, NUMBER 1 Great fleas have little fleas upon their backs to bite 'em, And little fleas have lesser fleas, and so ad infinitum. —Augustus De Morgan Dr. Indraneil Das Pangolins on Stamps More Inside >> IN THIS ISSUE NEW ISSUES: ARTICLES & ILLUSTRATIONS: From the Editor’s Desk ......................... 1 Botany – Christopher E. Dahle ............ 17 Pangolins on Stamps of the President’s Message .............................. 2 Fungi – Paul A. Mistretta .................... 28 World – Dr. Indraneil Das ..................7 Secretary -Treasurer’s Corner ................ 3 Mammalia – Michael Prince ................ 31 Squeaky Curtain – Frank Jacobs .......... 15 New Members ....................................... 3 Ornithology – Glenn G. Mertz ............. 35 New Plants in the Philatelic News of Note ......................................... 3 Ichthyology – J. Dale Shively .............. 57 Herbarium – Christopher Dahle ....... 23 Women’s Suffrage – Dawn Hamman .... 4 Entomology – Donald Wright, Jr. ........ 59 Rats! ..................................................... 34 Event Calendar ...................................... 6 Paleontology – Michael Kogan ........... 65 New Birds in the Philatelic Wedding Set ........................................ 16 Aviary – Charles E. Braun ............... 51 Glossary ............................................... 72 Biology Reference Websites ................ 69 ii Biophilately March 2020 Vol. 69 (1) BIOPHILATELY BIOLOGY UNIT
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Biodiversity and Climate Change
    Australia’s Biodiversity and Climate Change A strategic assessment of the vulnerability of Australia’s biodiversity to climate change A report to the Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council commissioned by the Australian Government. Prepared by the Biodiversity and Climate Change Expert Advisory Group: Will Steffen, Andrew A Burbidge, Lesley Hughes, Roger Kitching, David Lindenmayer, Warren Musgrave, Mark Stafford Smith and Patricia A Werner © Commonwealth of Australia 2009 ISBN 978-1-921298-67-7 Published in pre-publication form as a non-printable PDF at www.climatechange.gov.au by the Department of Climate Change. It will be published in hard copy by CSIRO publishing. For more information please email [email protected] This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the: Commonwealth Copyright Administration Attorney-General's Department 3-5 National Circuit BARTON ACT 2600 Email: [email protected] Or online at: http://www.ag.gov.au Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for Climate Change and Water and the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts. Citation The book should be cited as: Steffen W, Burbidge AA, Hughes L, Kitching R, Lindenmayer D, Musgrave W, Stafford Smith M and Werner PA (2009) Australia’s biodiversity and climate change: a strategic assessment of the vulnerability of Australia’s biodiversity to climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Papilio (New Series) #24 2016 Issn 2372-9449
    PAPILIO (NEW SERIES) #24 2016 ISSN 2372-9449 MEAD’S BUTTERFLIES IN COLORADO, 1871 by James A. Scott, Ph.D. in entomology, University of California Berkeley, 1972 (e-mail: [email protected]) Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………..……….……………….p. 1 Locations of Localities Mentioned Below…………………………………..……..……….p. 7 Summary of Butterflies Collected at Mead’s Major Localities………………….…..……..p. 8 Mead’s Butterflies, Sorted by Butterfly Species…………………………………………..p. 11 Diary of Mead’s Travels and Butterflies Collected……………………………….……….p. 43 Identity of Mead’s Field Names for Butterflies he Collected……………………….…….p. 64 Discussion and Conclusions………………………………………………….……………p. 66 Acknowledgments………………………………………………………….……………...p. 67 Literature Cited……………………………………………………………….………...….p. 67 Table 1………………………………………………………………………….………..….p. 6 Table 2……………………………………………………………………………………..p. 37 Introduction Theodore L. Mead (1852-1936) visited central Colorado from June to September 1871 to collect butterflies. Considerable effort has been spent trying to determine the identities of the butterflies he collected for his future father-in-law William Henry Edwards, and where he collected them. Brown (1956) tried to deduce his itinerary based on the specimens and the few letters etc. available to him then. Brown (1964-1987) designated lectotypes and neotypes for the names of the butterflies that William Henry Edwards described, including 24 based on Mead’s specimens. Brown & Brown (1996) published many later-discovered letters written by Mead describing his travels and collections. Calhoun (2013) purchased Mead’s journal and published Mead’s brief journal descriptions of his collecting efforts and his travels by stage and horseback and walking, and Calhoun commented on some of the butterflies he collected (especially lectotypes). Calhoun (2015a) published an abbreviated summary of Mead’s travels using those improved locations from the journal etc., and detailed the type localities of some of the butterflies named from Mead specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of the Type Specimens of Lepidoptera Rhopalocera in the Hill Museum
    Original from and digitized by National University of Singapore Libraries Original from and digitized by National University of Singapore Libraries Original from and digitized by National University of Singapore Libraries Original from and digitized by National University of Singapore Libraries CATALOGUE OF THE Type Specimens of Lepidoptera Rhopalocera IN THE HILL MUSEUM BY A. G. GABRIEL, F.E.S. Issued June, 1932 LONDON JOHN BALE, SONS & DANIELSSON, LTD. 83-91, GBEAT TITCHFIELD STEEET, OXEOED STEEET, W. 1 1932 Price 20/- Original from and digitized by National University of Singapore Libraries Unfortunately Mr. Joicey did not live to see the publication of this Catalogue. It will however remain, together with the four completed volumes of the " Bulletin of the Hill Museum," as a lasting memorial to to the magnificent collection of Lepidoptera amassed by Mr. Joicey, and to the work carried out at the Hill Museum under his auspices. G. Talbot. Original from and digitized by National University of Singapore Libraries CATALOGUE OF THE TYPE SPECIMENS OF LEPIDOPTERA RHOPALOCERA IN THE HILL MUSEUM. By A. G. GABRIEL, F.E.S. INTRODUCTION BY G. TALBOT. It is important to know exactly where type specimens are to be found. The British Museum set an example by publishing catalogues of some of their Rhopalocera types, and we hope this will be continued. Mr. Gabriel, who was responsible for that work, has been asked by Mr. Joicey to prepare a catalogue for the Hill Museum. The original description of almost every name in this catalogue has been examined for the correct reference, and where the sex or habitat was wrongly quoted, the necessary correction has been made.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture Corner Put Aside to Await Hatching, Which Takes 6 to 12 Or So Days at 75° to 80°F
    No.3 May/June 1983 of tht> LEPIDOPTERISTS' snell-TV June Preston, Editor 832 Sunset Drive Lawrenc~ KS 66044 USA ======================================================================================= ASSOCIATE EDITORS ART: Les Sielski RIPPLES: Jo Brewer ZONE COORDINATORS 1 Robert Langston 8 Kenelm Philip 2 Jon Shepard 5 Mo Nielsen 9 Eduardo Welling M. 3 Ray Stanford 6 Dave Baggett 10 Boyce Drummond 4 Hugh Freeman 7 Dave Winter 11 Quimby Hess ===.=========================================================.========================= CULTURING SATYRIDS Satyrids (or satyrines, if you prefer) have always had a special fascination for me, perhaps partly because of their tendency for great geographic variation. In Eurasia satyrids account for a large part of the butterfly fauna, and many of the common species (e.g. Pararge spp.) are multivoltine even in northern Europe. Here the grass-feeding niche seems to be dominated by skippers, and only a very few of the American species north of, say, latitude 40 0 N have more than one generation per season. When rearing satyrids, the key word is PATIENCE. Most species grow very slowly and must be carried over the winter as diapausing larvae. On the other hand, generally they are quite tough and survive well under laboratory culture conditions. There is usually no problem getting eggs. I confine each wild or lab-mated female in a quart jar put on its side and scatter a handful of grass sedge the length of the jar so that the female will flutter on top of it. Females are fed individually each morning on sugar-water-soaked pieces of paper towel in petri dishes, then put into the jars. I cover the open end of each jar with a piece of nylon stocking held with a rubber band, then line the jars up on their sides on a shelf with a fluorescent light with two 40-watt tubes about 8 inches above.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Season Summary Index NEW WOFTHE~ Zone 1: Yukon Territory
    2010 Season Summary Index NEW WOFTHE~ Zone 1: Yukon Territory ........................................................................................... 3 Alaska ... ........................................ ............................................................... 3 LEPIDOPTERISTS Zone 2: British Columbia .................................................... ........................ ............ 6 Idaho .. ... ....................................... ................................................................ 6 Oregon ........ ... .... ........................ .. .. ............................................................ 10 SOCIETY Volume 53 Supplement Sl Washington ................................................................................................ 14 Zone 3: Arizona ............................................................ .................................... ...... 19 The Lepidopterists' Society is a non-profo California ............... ................................................. .............. .. ................... 2 2 educational and scientific organization. The Nevada ..................................................................... ................................ 28 object of the Society, which was formed in Zone 4: Colorado ................................ ... ............... ... ...... ......................................... 2 9 May 1947 and formally constituted in De­ Montana .................................................................................................... 51 cember
    [Show full text]
  • Samia Cynthia in New Jersey Book Review, Market- Place, Metamorphosis, Announcements, Membership Updates
    ________________________________________________________________________________________ Volume 61, Number 4 Winter 2019 www.lepsoc.org ________________________________________________________________________________________ Inside: Butterflies of Papua Southern Pearly Eyes in exotic Louisiana venue Philippine butterflies and moths: a new website The Lepidopterists’ Society collecting statement updated Lep Soc, Southern Lep Soc, and Assoc of Trop Lep combined meeting Butterfly vicariance in southeast Asia Samia cynthia in New Jersey Book Review, Market- place, Metamorphosis, Announcements, Membership Updates ... and more! ________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________ Contents www.lepsoc.org ________________________________________________________ Digital Collecting -- Butterflies of Papua, Indonesia ____________________________________ Bill Berthet. .......................................................................................... 159 Volume 61, Number 4 Butterfly vicariance in Southeast Asia Winter 2019 John Grehan. ........................................................................................ 168 Metamorphosis. ....................................................................................... 171 The Lepidopterists’ Society is a non-profit ed- Membership Updates. ucational and scientific organization. The ob- Chris Grinter. ....................................................................................... 171
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity Pattern of Butterfly Communities (Lepidoptera
    International Scholarly Research Network ISRN Zoology Volume 2011, Article ID 818545, 8 pages doi:10.5402/2011/818545 Research Article DiversityPatternofButterflyCommunities (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidae) in Different Habitat Types in a Tropical Rain Forest of Southern Vietnam Lien Van Vu1 and Con Quang Vu2 1 Department of Biology, Vietnam National Museum of Nature, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Nghia Do, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam 2 Department of Insect Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Nghia Do, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam Correspondence should be addressed to Lien Van Vu, [email protected] Received 26 January 2011; Accepted 1 March 2011 Academic Editors: M. Griggio and V. Tilgar Copyright © 2011 L. V. Vu and C. Quang Vu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Diversity of butterfly communities of a tropical rain forest of Bu Gia Map National Park in South Vietnam was studied in four different habitat types (the natural forest, the disturbed forest, the bamboo forest, and the stream sides in the forest) in December 2008 and April 2009. A total of 112 species with 1703 individuals of Papilionoidae (except Lycaenidae) were recorded. The proportion of rare species tends to decrease from the natural forest to the stream sides, while the proportion of common species tends to increase from the natural forest to the stream sides. The stream sides have the greatest individual number, while the disturbed forest contains the greatest species number. The bamboo forest has the least species and individual numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural History of Fiji's Endemic Swallowtail Butterfly, Papilio Schmeltzi
    32 TROP. LEPID. RES., 23(1): 32-38, 2013 CHANDRA ET AL.: Life history of Papilio schmeltzi NATURAL HISTORY OF FIJI’S ENDEMIC SWALLOWTAIL BUTTERFLY, PAPILIO SCHMELTZI (HERRICH-SCHAEFFER) Visheshni Chandra1, Uma R. Khurma1 and Takashi A. Inoue2 1School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Technology and Environment, The University of the South Pacific, Private Bag, Suva, Fiji. Correspondance: [email protected]; 2Japanese National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Ôwashi 1-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8634, Japan Abstract - The wild population of Papilio schmeltzi (Herrich-Schaeffer) in the Fiji Islands is very small. Successful rearing methods should be established prior to any attempts to increase numbers of the natural population. Therefore, we studied the biology of this species. Papilio schmeltzi was reared on Micromelum minutum. Three generations were reared during the period from mid April 2008 to end of November 2008, and hence we estimate that in nature P. schmeltzi may have up to eight generations in a single year. Key words: Papilio schmeltzi, Micromelum minutum, life cycle, larval host plant, developmental duration, morphological characters, captive breeding INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS Most of the Asia-Pacific swallowtail butterflies P. schmeltzi was reared in a screened enclosure from mid (Lepidopera: Papilionidae) belonging to the genus Papilio are April 2008 to end of November 2008. The enclosure was widely distributed in the tropics (e.g. Asia, Papua New Guinea, designed to provide conditions as close to its natural habitat as Australia, New Caledonia, Vanuatu, Solomon Islands, Fiji and possible and was located in an open area at the University of Samoa).
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Capture and Management of Digital Zoological Names Information Francisco W
    Guidelines for the Capture and Management of Digital Zoological Names Information Francisco W. Welter-Schultes Version 1.1 March 2013 Suggested citation: Welter-Schultes, F.W. (2012). Guidelines for the capture and management of digital zoological names information. Version 1.1 released on March 2013. Copenhagen: Global Biodiversity Information Facility, 126 pp, ISBN: 87-92020-44-5, accessible online at http://www.gbif.org/orc/?doc_id=2784. ISBN: 87-92020-44-5 (10 digits), 978-87-92020-44-4 (13 digits). Persistent URI: http://www.gbif.org/orc/?doc_id=2784. Language: English. Copyright © F. W. Welter-Schultes & Global Biodiversity Information Facility, 2012. Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and opinions presented in this publication are those of the author and do not represent those of GBIF. License: This document is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0. Document Control: Version Description Date of release Author(s) 0.1 First complete draft. January 2012 F. W. Welter- Schultes 0.2 Document re-structured to improve February 2012 F. W. Welter- usability. Available for public Schultes & A. review. González-Talaván 1.0 First public version of the June 2012 F. W. Welter- document. Schultes 1.1 Minor editions March 2013 F. W. Welter- Schultes Cover Credit: GBIF Secretariat, 2012. Image by Levi Szekeres (Romania), obtained by stock.xchng (http://www.sxc.hu/photo/1389360). March 2013 ii Guidelines for the management of digital zoological names information Version 1.1 Table of Contents How to use this book ......................................................................... 1 SECTION I 1. Introduction ................................................................................ 2 1.1. Identifiers and the role of Linnean names ......................................... 2 1.1.1 Identifiers ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Signal Environment Is More Important Than Diet Or Chemical Specialization in the Evolution of Warning Coloration
    The signal environment is more important than diet or chemical specialization in the evolution of warning coloration Kathleen L. Prudic†‡, Jeffrey C. Oliver§, and Felix A. H. Sperling¶ †Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and §Interdisciplinary Program in Insect Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721; and ¶Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2E9 Edited by May R. Berenbaum, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL, and approved October 11, 2007 (received for review June 13, 2007) Aposematic coloration, or warning coloration, is a visual signal that in ref. 13). Prey can become noxious by consuming other organisms acts to minimize contact between predator and unprofitable prey. with defensive compounds (e.g., refs. 15 and 16). By specializing on The conditions favoring the evolution of aposematic coloration re- a particular toxic diet, the consumer becomes noxious and more main largely unidentified. Recent work suggests that diet specializa- likely to evolve aposematic coloration as a defensive strategy tion and resultant toxicity may play a role in facilitating the evolution (reviewed in ref. 13). Diet specialization, in which a consumer feeds and persistence of warning coloration. Using a phylogenetic ap- on a limited set of related organisms, allows the consumer to tailor proach, we investigated the evolution of larval warning coloration in its metabolism to efficiently capitalize on the specific toxins shared the genus Papilio (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Our results indicate that by a suite of related hosts. Recent investigations suggest that diet there are at least four independent origins of aposematic larval specialization on toxic organisms promotes the evolution of apose- coloration within Papilio.
    [Show full text]