Medicine and Literature

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Medicine and Literature MEDICINE AND LITERATURE. H. S. CARTER, M.D., D.P.H. The advantage of an inclusive title for an essay is that it allows a wide field for exploration by the writer, and in this survey will permit consideration not only of references to doctors and medical matters in literature, but of glances at literary achievements by doctors no less than at such medical men who have been used as prototypes for characters in imaginative writings. Thus we may, for example, refer to Moliere's repeated satires upon the medicine of his time, the immortal verse of Dr. Keats and the supposed portrait of Dr. Allbutt in Middlewareh. Plato discussed Greek physicians and physic, and regarded Hippo- crates as a master, but makes little allusion to him. He has no definite description of the methods of healing in Aesculapian temples. He speaks of epidemics as due to the anger of departed souls. He placed the liver little below the brain in importance and regarded the spleen as a mopper- up of noxious humours. There is a substratum of biology in his writings which his pupil Aristotle was to expand. In the Symposium he makes Eriximachus, a physician who talks a good deal, give a prescription for hiccough to Aristophanes, who, no doubt, had laughed too much at his own satires. It was that sneezing will cure the most persistent hiccough. Plato fathered some grotesque notions upon medical teaching, though sneezing will sometimes stop a hiccough ; but amyl nitrite is better. Aristotle, who studied medicine, never practised it. He was an all- round philosopher with an interest in natural science, and while laying the foundations of Zoology in his Historia animalium, did not disdain ethics and politics. He thought the heart the seat of the soul and was aware of its importance ; he believed in a spontaneous generation, so that the problem of Aphrodite rising from the foam was no problem to him : but he also believed that a child was of its father. His biological studies were deep and covered a large field. The Stagirite was the ancestor of modern biologists and the medical atmosphere of his times pervades his writings. Let us jump the centuries to Chaucer, Comptroller of Customs at ' ' the Port of London, and according to Q the greatest story-teller in the power of visualising all sorts and conditions of men and limning them in swift short strokes, before Charles Dickens. Chaucer drew a Doctor of Medicine in his tale of the Doctor of Physick. He is supposed to have been John of Gaddesdon, who among other things was a Pre- bendary of St. Paul's and physician to Edward II. He wrote a book 144 MEDICINE AND LITERATURE?CARTER 145 Rosa Anglica (1314) which was described by his critics as a hotch-potch of quackery and superstition ; it was much denigrated by de Chauliac and later by Haller. It was strong in countryside and domestic lore, but said to contain a reference to the treatment of smallpox by red light. Chaucer's tale is more in the style of the cleric of vSt. Paul's than in that of a physician, but it contains good counsel. In the Prologue to Ids tales Chaucer describes a mediaeval physician, presumably he who told the tale. This good man kept his patient wonderfully well at all times by his natural magic. He knew Hippocrates, Galen and Avicenna? ' and was, in short, a very parfit' practitioner who, once he knew the cause ?f a patient's sickness, made haste to apply suitable remedies. Poggio, the great Florentine scholar of the Renaissance, pilloried the doctors in his facetious stories, which are often indecent. It is fair to say that he attacked the monks also. He wrote moral essays, and his worst stories often point a moral. It is no great step from Chaucer to laughter-loving Francois Rabelais, monk, physician, teacher, editor of Hippocrates, and creator of a marvel of literary art. He was born at Chinon about 1495, and was a practiser of medicine and a vagabond in literature. He is so various in his writings that even scholars are at a loss to interpret him ; for some he is the great humanist, theologian and moralist, but for most a teller of tales and an artist in the shameless exaggeration of the ludicrous, riotously displayed in coarsest caricature With torrents of words. His characters are humanity in the warm flesh. ?His Panurge is next to Falstaff as a comic figure, and his whole book one vast roaring superabundance. It is spattered with strange medical erudition. He attacks the quackery and superstition of his time, but as became a Greek scholar, he followed the Greek ideal and believed and taught that the welfare of the patient is the good physician's prime concern. He was a Doctor of Montpellier and practised in Lyons and elsewhere in the South. Towards the end of his life he was the famous ' Cure of Meudon. Trajan was a fisher of frogs,' he shouts, and the Great Bell of Notre Dame told him that ' Mieulx est de ris que de larmes escrire.' His book can be understood only by those versed in the bypaths of ancient literature and an archaic vocabulary, but we have him in the magic transmutation of Urquhart, whose laughing ebullience sometimes ahnost o'ertops the Master. It is little wonder that in his plays Shakespeare shows much acquain- tance with medicine, for his life almost bridged the gap between the death of Vesalius and the publication of Harvey's thesis 011 the circulation of the blood. The Italian schools were then very active and the estab- lished conclusions of the human mind, that slave of life, were being modi- fied by the influence of men of guiding genius thrown up during the Renaissance. Galen's ideas were being questioned and the teaching of 14<> GLASGOW MEDICAL JOURNAL Paracelsus was still discussed. Although the planets moved, the common belief was not dissipated that the stars were fixed, revolving with the rolling vault of the heavens on the inner sphere enclosing that product of Nature, man. John Caius, student of the sweating sickness, who enlarged a college foundation at Cambridge, was dead when the poet was a little boy. He was undoubtedly the prototype, in the guise of a French physician, for the Dr. Caius of The Merry Wives of Windsor. There are references in the plays to almost every branch of medicine and surgery. In Troilus and Cressida there is a long list of diseases patently connected with syphilis. Venereal disease is often alluded to. Aesculapius, Hippocrates, Galen, Paracelsus are all mentioned, some more than once. Falstaff got his knowledge of apoplexy from Galen. There are many physicians and surgeons in the plaj^s, and the apothecary in Romeo and Juliet is drawn as a poor sort of fellow dwelling among strange simples in an atmosphere of alchemy. Shakespeare, who described politicians as ' scurvy is not more polite to the doctors. He wrote, the patient dies ' while the physician sleeps,' and advises, trust not the physician ; his antidotes are poison.' That strange sixteenth century swaggering compound of philosopher and charlatan, Paracelsus, whose real contribution to medicine in pharma- cology and therapeutics is overlaid by the turgidity of his writing, was the subject of a poem by Browning. Although there were queer things in Paracelsus' arcana, and he believed in astral influences and a life-force lie called Archaeus, yet according to old Robert Burton, he used to tell his patients that faith and a strong imagination would work wonders. But he does not appear to have been the cultured mystic of Browning's poem. He was a strong rumbustious disputatious character and had little of the lofty spirit with which the poet endows him. The blank verse of the poem is relieved by lyrics, one of which is redolent with the odour of oriental spices which might well have found place in Paracelsus' pharmacy- ' Heap cassia, sandal-buds and stripes Of labdanum, and aloes balls, Smeared with dull nard, an Indian wipes ' From out her hair : From all accounts there was nothing lyrical about Paracelsus. Browning is credited with using another eminent doctor of this period in poetic fancy: Thomas Iyinacre, physician to Henry VII, who did service by producing scholarly versions of the early medical masters. He was a classicist, and it is upon the opinion of his pupil, Erasmus, that he was a better grammarian than physician (which was also Thomas Fuller's view) that he is alleged to be the subject of A Grammarian's Funeral, ' He settled Hoti's business?-let it be !?- Properly based Oun? Gave us the doctrine of the enclitic De,' MEDICINE AND LITERATURE?CARTER 147 The closing lines of this poem, wrote Arthur Symons, is one of the noblest requiems ever chanted over the grave of a scholar. Fuller called lyinacre and Caius the Phoenixes of our Profession, in that the latter had in some sort sprung from the ashes of the former. Their joint memorial in Old St. Paul's was crowned by a phoenix. The life of Robert Burton spanned the bridge of these centuries and produced for us what Osier called the greatest treatise on medicine ever written by a layman?The Anatomy of Melancholy. While no apostle of cheerfulness, the author was no misanthropic pessimist. He was not a doctor, but a clerk in holy orders, of Christ Church, Oxford, full of zeal and charity, and a bit of an astrologer. His book is a strange medley of learning?theology, medicine, classical lore, superstition and common- sense, with not a little psychology are mixed into a literary brew, in Wordy but orderly profusion.
Recommended publications
  • A Newly Purchased Letter T
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln The George Eliot Review English, Department of 2-23-1987 A Newly Purchased Letter T. Clifford Allbutt Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ger Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, Literature in English, British Isles Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Allbutt, T. Clifford, "A Newly Purchased Letter" (1987). The George Eliot Review. 62. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ger/62 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the English, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in The George Eliot Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. A NEWLY PURCHASED LETTER The following letter has recently been purchased by Nuneaton Museum and Art Gallery ~nd its pub I ication here (as far as we are aware, for the first time) is with the Curator's kind permission. Unfortunately, no year is shown with the date, neither is the correspondent addressed in any other way than by 'My dear Sir', so it has been impossible to discover to whom it was written. All one can say is that it was penned some time between 1890 (the date of publ ication of Oscar Browning's Life of George El iot) and 1925 when Sir Thomas Clifford Allbutt, the writer of the letter, died - a very long span! T. Clifford Allbutt (1836-1925) met George Eliot in 1868. In 1864 he had been appointed physician to. the Leeds General Infi rmary. and George El iot and Lewes spent two days looking around the new hospital with him.
    [Show full text]
  • “MIDDLEMARCH” and the PHYSICIAN (“MIDDLEMARCH” and SIR WILLIAM OSLER) by H
    “MIDDLEMARCH” AND THE PHYSICIAN (“MIDDLEMARCH” AND SIR WILLIAM OSLER) By H. A. DEROW, M.D. BOSTON, MASS. “ A SK the opinion of a dozen medical men There are few things better worth the pains / upon the novel in which the doctor in a provincial town like this. A fine fever L \\ is best described, and the majority hospital in addition to the old infirmary might / \\ will say ‘Middlemarch.’” be the nucleus of a medical school here, when we Sir William Osler. once get our medical reforms; and what would George Eliot’s chief object in “Middle­ do more for medical education than the spread of such schools over the country? march” was to show that “There is no creature whose inward feeling is so strong The extent of the scientific knowledge of that it is not greatly determined by what Lydgate’s colleagues in Middlemarch (the lies outside it, and in obedience to this law, time of the novel is about 1830), as expressed character grows or decays.” Lydgate, the by him, is indicated by the following: physician, is the central figure of special As to the higher questions which determine interest whose career is emblazoned with the starting point of a diagnosis—as to the a great moral for the medical profession. philosophy of medical evidence—any glimmer­ Settling in Middlemarch, a provincial ing of these can only come from a scientific town of England, Lydgate decided to be a culture of which country practitioners have good Middlemarch doctor and by that usually no more notion than the man in the moon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Healing Hand in Literature: Shakespeare and Surgery
    Shakespeare and surgery Thehealinghandinliterature:Shakespeareandsurgery KTLFu The interplay between surgery and dramatic literature in the plays of Shakespeare is reviewed. This review attempts to explore medical references in Shakespeare’s works and to analyse the medical and social background of his time. Caution should be taken in interpreting Shakespeare’s works through a modern medical view; diseases and their therapy are used metaphorically as a means to an end in the Bard’s masterly hands. Shakespeare’s medical knowledge may be accounted for by his avid reading of contemporary medical texts, from primary or secondary sources; an astute sense of observation of Lon- don’s medical practitioners—bona fide or otherwise—and their activities and patients; and a medical connection by way of his son-in-law, Dr John Hall. It should be remembered that nothing in Nature stands alone; but every art and science has a relation to some other art or science, that it requires us to have a knowledge of those others, as this connexion takes place, to enable us to become perfect in that which engages our particular attention. John Hunter (1728-93) HKMJ 1998;4:77-88 Key words: History of medicine, ancient; History of medicine, medieval; History of medicine, 16th cent.; History of medicine, 17th cent.; History of medicine, 18th cent.; Medicine in literature Introduction seen. The patient’s history is the story of his life— his odyssey in the realm of disease. A primary This review attempts to explore the history of the source for the doctor is the personal history of dramatic representation of surgery and orthopaedics the patient which is in truth his life story.
    [Show full text]
  • Progressive Reactionary: the Life and Works of John Caius, Md
    PROGRESSIVE REACTIONARY: THE LIFE AND WORKS OF JOHN CAIUS, MD by Dannielle Marie Cagliuso Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2015 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH KENNETH P. DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This thesis was presented by Dannielle Marie Cagliuso It was defended on July 20, 2015 and approved by Dr. Peter Distelzweig, Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy (University of St. Thomas) Dr. Emily Winerock, Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of History Dr. Janelle Greenberg, Professor, Department of History Thesis Director: Dr. James G. Lennox, Professor and Chair, Department of History and Philosophy of Science ii Copyright © by Dannielle Marie Cagliuso 2015 iii PROGRESSIVE REACTIONARY: THE LIFE AND WORKS OF JOHN CAIUS, MD Dannielle Marie Cagliuso, BPhil University of Pittsburgh, 2015 The picture of Dr. John Caius (1510-1573) is fraught with contradictions. Though he had an excellent reputation among his contemporaries, subsequent scholars tend to view him more critically. Caius is frequently condemned as a reactionary and compared unfavorably to his more “progressive” contemporaries, like Conrad Gesner and Andreas Vesalius. This approach to Caius is an example of what I term “progressivist history,” a prevalent but problematic trend in historical scholarship. Progressivist history applies a progressive-reactionary dichotomy to the past, splitting people and events into two discrete camps. By exploring the life and works of John Caius and comparing him to some of his “progressive” contemporaries, I reveal why this dichotomy is problematic. It treats both the progressive “heroes” and reactionary “villains” unfairly in that it fails to appreciate the agency of each individual and the nuanced differences between them.
    [Show full text]
  • 500 Years of the Royal College of Physicians
    500 Years of the Royal College of Physicians Professor Simon Bowman Harveian Librarian (with particular thanks to Kristin Hussey, Julie Beckwith, Louella Vaughan and other colleagues) 16th Century The Founding of the College 1518 1510 - 1500-1535 Church of England 1534 Cast list Thomas Linacre Cardinal Wolsey King Henry VIII 1460-1524. 1st PRCP 1470-1530 1491-1547 B: Derby (age 27 in 1518) Educ: Canterbury, Oxford, Florence, Padua Tutor to: Prince Arthur Royal Physician Medical Marketplace • Extremely vigorous and varied • Array of people jostling for custom - surgeons/barbers - Apothecaries/grocers/spicers - ‘illiterate Monks and Empiricks’ - assorted other quacks, blood-letters and charlatans… • Plague, influenza, smallpox, dysentery, syphilis Physicianly Medicine c1518 • Hippocrates, Galen, Avicenna: 460-370 BC 129-200 AD 980-1037 AD • Four Humors: blood, phlegm, choler (yellow bile), melancholy (black bile) • Treatments – Bloodletting & Purging – Astrology – Uroscopy – Herbs & Medicines Founding of the College • Founded in 1518. Linacre=PRCP • Bulwark against ‘quacks & charlatans’ • Based on Padua? ‘Humanism’ • Right to ‘make Statutes … most expedient for publick Service’ • ‘With regard to their own dignity, the good of the people, and in particular to the honour of the Universities (Oxbridge)’ • 1st home=Knightrider Street The 1518 Charter • Granted same rights as previously given to the Church to regulate medical practice within 7 miles of the City of London • Rights to examine, admit and appoint • President elected for 1 year at
    [Show full text]
  • William Harvey, M.D.: Modern Or Ancient Scientist? Herbert Albert
    [Loyola Book Comp., run.tex: 0 AQR–Vol. W–rev. 0, 14 Nov 2003 ] [The Aquinas Review–Vol. W–rev. 0: 1 14 Nov 2003, 4:02 p.m.] . The Aquinas Review, Vol. III, No. 1, 1996 William Harvey, M.D.: Modern or Ancient Scientist? Herbert Albert Ratner, M.D.ý William Harvey was born in England in 1578 and died in 1657. He received his grammar school education at the famous King’s School in Canterbury. In 1593 he en- tered Caius College, Cambridge, and received his B.A. degree in 1597. In this period, it was not unusual for English Protestants interested in a scientific education to seek it in a continental Catholic university. Harvey chose the Universitas Juristarum, the more influential of the two universities which constituted the University of Padua in Italy and which had been attended by Thomas Linacre and John Caius, and where, incidentally, the Dominican priests were associated with University functions. Competency in the traditional studies of the day was characteristic of William Harvey’s intellectual develop- ment. The degree of Doctor of Physic was awarded to Harvey in 1602 with the unusual testimonial that ‘‘he had conducted himself so wonderfully well in the examina- tion, and had shown such skill, memory, and learning that he had far surpassed even the great hopes which his Dr. Ratner, a philosopher of medicine, is Visiting Professor of Com- munity and Preventive Medicine, New York Medical College, and editor of Child and Family. This article was originally published as one of a series in a special issue of The Thomist, Volume XXIV, Nos.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Vicary Lecture
    THOMAS VICARY LECTURE THE RENAISSANCE AND ITS INFLUENCE ON ENGLISH MEDICINE SURGERY AND PUBLIC HEALTH By Sir Arthur Salusbury MacNalty, K.C.B., M.D., F.R.C.P., F.R.C.S. THOMAS VICARY, Serjeant-Surgeon to King Henry VIII, King Edward VI, Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth, Master of the Barbers' Company, four times Master of the Barber-Surgeons' Company and Surgeon to St. Bartholomew's Hospital, flourished as England's leading surgeon from 1527 to 1562. His life was passed in stirring times. A new world had been discovered by Columbus. Vicary saw the convulsive change produced by the Reformation and the Dissolution of the Monasteries, the fires at Smithfield and Oxford smoking with the blood of the martyrs, and above all he experienced the influence of the Renaissance and the birth of freedom of thought, individual initiative and action which guided him in his work for British surgery. It was in the times of Thomas Vicary, then, that a new spirit arose in national thought, and amid a despotic rule, much oppression and injustice, it is possible to trace advances in medicine and surgery, in public health, in social medicine and in culture and education. It was not until the value of Greek thought became manifest to the practical Englishman that the influence of the Renaissance became widespread. This heritage was brought to England by a band of Oxford men known as the Humanists. The teaching of Colet, Grocyn and Linacre, together with young Thomas More, made Oxford famous as a seat of learning. Bishop Fox in 1516 founded Corpus Christi College at Oxford in the interests of the new learning, and John Fisher promoted the spread of Hellenic thought at Cambridge.
    [Show full text]
  • The Harveian Oration
    OCTOBER 28, 1916. Theodore Goulston, who was one of Harvey’s younger contemporaries and was Censor for a time, left an endow- Oration. ment for a lectureship to be given to one of the four youngest The Harveian fellows of the College. Delivered at the Royal College of Physicians of London on Sir Theodore de Mayerne, who was another of Harvey’s Oct. 18th, 1916, contemporaries, was like his fellow countryman Casaubon, an example of the fundamental tolerance and broadminded- BY SIR THOMAS BARLOW, BT., K.C.V.O., ness of the English nation. After a distinguished medical M.D., F.R.S., career in France he was hospitably received in this country FELLOW OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF LONDON. and rose to be Court physician to James I. and Charles I. He became a fellow of our College, gained a high reputation, and bequeathed his library when he died. HARVEY, THE MAN AND THE PHYSICIAN. We next come to Bildwin Hamey, junior. He was another of one of his most MR. PRESIDENT, FELLOWS OF THE COLLEGE, AND GENTLE- Harvey’s contemporaries and, indeed, intimate friends. He was our treasurer from 1664 to 1666 MEN,-Once again we meet on St. Luke’s Day to commemorate and anatomical lectures to the a the benefactors of our beloved College and to carry out the gave College. Though he had a lucrative c’ientele the injunctions of the illustrious Harvey, who was the greatest strong Royalist amongst benefactor of them all. leading men of the Commonwealth and was our most munificent benefactor.
    [Show full text]
  • Institute Library
    Medical History, 1985, 29: 93-97. ILLUSTRATIONS FROM THE WELLCOME INSTITUTE LIBRARY CONRAD GESNER AND THE ENGLISH NATURALISTS* Edward Wotton (1492-1555), President of the London College of Physicians from 1541 to 1543, is remembered today for only two things; his part in the publication of the first edition of the complete works of Galen in their original Greek, which appeared at Venice in 1525,1 and his book De differentiis animalium. This, the first renaissance work on natural history to be written by an Englishman, was published by Vascosanus in Paris in 1552 in an extremely elegant folio, prefaced by an ode in Greek by the French physician, Jacques Goupyl.2 It is in ten books, and covers the whole of the animal world, from man to molluscs, in a clearly arranged attempt to encapsulate the most reliable information taken from the best authorities. For Wotton, these were his classical sources, Pliny and Aristotle chief among them, and, to a much lesser extent, their humanist successors such as Ermolao Barbaro and John Claymond. Wotton's book is thus, in the words of C. E. Raven, "a useful compendium of the traditional lore ... but not a book with much originality or human feeling".3 The Wellcome Institute copy of Wotton's treatise (catalogue number 6777) bears on its title-page a less charitable judgement by an unnamed contemporary (fig. 1): transtulit plurima ex Athenaeo etiam, sed ut uideo nec tanta diligentia usus est qua ipse sum usus. (He took a great deal from Athenaeus even, but, as far as I can see, not everything; nor was he as careful as I have been.) There then follows, written in the book's margins, a whole series of corrections, criticisms, and additions to substantiate this harsh verdict.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of B-Vitamin Deficiency,Deprivation of A-Vitamin
    198 rapidly. The thought of our age was separated from present house, and since then among its eminent that of previous ages by the doctrine of evolution, Fellows the names of Richard Bright, Addison, and which had done at least as much to stimulate the Thomas Watson are prominent. studies of the historian as to guide the researches of Dr. Arnold Chaplin, the Harveian Librarian, then the biologist. The whole of evolutionary teaching gave an account of the library, enumerating some of might be summed up in the phrase that organic the special treasures contained in it, and commenting products are the outcome of their history, and can on the fact that every branch of learning was only be understood when their history is known. represented therein. No great system such as that of modern medicine could be understood without reference to its past. The political history of civilisation had always formed the main topic of school and university education, IMPERIAL CANCER RESEARCH FUND. yet the study of the conditions which had made that civilisation possible, the origin and development of THE twentieth annual of this Fund was scientific had until been report thought, recently neglected. presented at the annual meeting on July 19th. It Dr. to discuss the achievements in Singer pro-ceeded was announced that the gift from Lord Athelstan of the of the of Medicine of some of department History 22000 a year for 10 years is to be allocated to an more of the in this the eminent exponents subject extension of the on the infective their President of Sir investigations country, including Honour, sarcomata (dogs and fowls) with a view to defining the Norman Moore, and Sir Clifford Allbutt, as showing difference between these and true neoplasms.
    [Show full text]
  • Institute Library
    Medical History, 1985, 29: 93-97. ILLUSTRATIONS FROM THE WELLCOME INSTITUTE LIBRARY CONRAD GESNER AND THE ENGLISH NATURALISTS* Edward Wotton (1492-1555), President of the London College of Physicians from 1541 to 1543, is remembered today for only two things; his part in the publication of the first edition of the complete works of Galen in their original Greek, which appeared at Venice in 1525,1 and his book De differentiis animalium. This, the first renaissance work on natural history to be written by an Englishman, was published by Vascosanus in Paris in 1552 in an extremely elegant folio, prefaced by an ode in Greek by the French physician, Jacques Goupyl.2 It is in ten books, and covers the whole of the animal world, from man to molluscs, in a clearly arranged attempt to encapsulate the most reliable information taken from the best authorities. For Wotton, these were his classical sources, Pliny and Aristotle chief among them, and, to a much lesser extent, their humanist successors such as Ermolao Barbaro and John Claymond. Wotton's book is thus, in the words of C. E. Raven, "a useful compendium of the traditional lore ... but not a book with much originality or human feeling".3 The Wellcome Institute copy of Wotton's treatise (catalogue number 6777) bears on its title-page a less charitable judgement by an unnamed contemporary (fig. 1): transtulit plurima ex Athenaeo etiam, sed ut uideo nec tanta diligentia usus est qua ipse sum usus. (He took a great deal from Athenaeus even, but, as far as I can see, not everything; nor was he as careful as I have been.) There then follows, written in the book's margins, a whole series of corrections, criticisms, and additions to substantiate this harsh verdict.
    [Show full text]
  • Osler Library Newsletter
    OSLER LIBRARY NEWSLETTER McGILL UNIVERSITY, MONTREAL, CANADA No. 47 - October 1984 A NARRATIVE OF OSLER'S LAST ILLNESS EAR THEENDof his Life of Sir William 5. xii. '19 When I telephoned after lunch yesterday Sir Wm. heard Osler, Harvey Cushing mentions T. about it and said he wished me to be here. I came down on the 4.45 Archibald Malloch's arrival at Oxford «bringing Reord syringe & needles with me" and Dr. Gibson soon early in December of 1919 and the notes came & told me the white count was 27,000 & agreed that !a\ that Malloch kept of Osler's last illness. «the" chest should be needled. (I had written on 1st to him that W.O. suspected a loculated collection & said 'I imagine it would The notes resurfaced this summer when comfort him to have his chest needled in a couple of places' - his they came to the Osler Library with a temp. from being normal had risen on 30th Nov. to 101°. [)] Sir group of Malloch's books and Thos. Horder came at 8.22 & I met him. After he had dinner Drs manuscripts, the gift dfhis son, Professor A.E. Malloch. The notes Collier & Gibson came in and we discussed the case & then he are here published for thefirst time. Their importance lies in being went up & examined W.O. then we all talked it over in the sitting- an eye-witness account of the final stage of Osler's life. room. He thought there possible [sic] was a focus (an abscess) in the rt. 1.1.
    [Show full text]