DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 1 Statement of Consultation , Item 7A PDF 571 KB

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix 1 Statement of Consultation , Item 7A PDF 571 KB City of London Supplementary Planning Documents Appendix 1 - Consultation Statement July 2017 1 The Introduction to the Historic Environment Strategy, the Archaeology Guidance SPD and the Churchyard Statements were published in draft for public consultation during a ten week period from 29th October 2015 to 8th January 2016. Prior to the public consultation the drafts were prepared by officers in the Department of the Built Environment in consultation with colleagues in that and other departments within the City of London Corporation and the text was approved by the Planning and Transportation Committee. Regulation 12 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 require the City Corporation to prepare a consultation statement setting out the persons consulted when preparing a supplementary planning document, a summary of the main issues raised by those persons and how these have been addressed in the SPD. The following measures were taken to consult the public on the SPDs and evidence bases during the consultation period: Website. The draft SPD and evidence base documents were made available on the City Corporation‟s website. Information and a link were provided on the home page of the City‟s website and on the landing page of the Planning section of the website to ensure maximum exposure. Information was provided in the City of London e-shot. Inspection copies. A copy of the SPD and the evidence base documents were made available at the Planning Information desk at the Guildhall and the Guildhall, Barbican, Artizan Street and Shoe Lane public libraries. Notifications. Letters and emails containing information about the draft SPD and other documents and inviting comments were sent to relevant specific and general consultation bodies. The City Corporation maintains a database of all those who have expressed an interest in planning policy, and letters or emails were also sent to all those on the list. Leaflets advertising the draft SPD and evidence base documents consultation and inviting comments were placed in the Guildhall, Barbican, Artizan Street and Shoe Lane public libraries. Meetings. Presentations on the Historic Environment Strategy were given to the Conservation Area Advisory Committee. The planned preparation of the draft SPDs was posted in the Local Plan Bulletin and on the Consultations page of the City of London website. Members of the public were invited to make comments to contribute to the preparation of the draft SPDs. No such comments were received. Responses to the consultation were received from the City of London Archaeological Trust (CoLAT), Natural England, Transport for London, Tideway, the Port of London Authority, Historic England and the City of London Conservation Area Advisory Committee. The table that follows summarises the comments and explains how they were addressed in finalising the SPDs. 2 Summary of comments and responses – minor amendments to deal with typos/errors in the comments will be made in the final documents Doc Comment Response City of London Archaeological Trust Archaeology and Development Guidance SPD All This is the latest edition of a set of procedures which have been developed by the City over the last three decades. As an example of procedures to manage how archaeology fits into the development process, it is a model for other cities in Europe and further afield. The City should be congratulated on the statement of these procedures. All the procedures concerning archaeology however need constant vigilance by the Corporation‟s officers if they are to be observed by developers (secular or religious). We perceive that the front end of archaeological projects, how the access to sites is managed and the excavations, together with immediate post-excavation work, is in general well done by archaeological contractors and regulated by the Corporation. We recommend that the Corporation puts equal effort into ensuring that developers do their duty in funding publication beyond the writing of the post-excavation assessment which is sometimes erroneously thought of as the final report; as required by this SPD on p.30 and national legislation. As this text is a version which has grown over the years, there are some out of date references which should be changed. Here are a few: 1. Photographic standards have been updated 1. p.25: surely the reference to 35mm film is now out of date. 2. ‘LAARC’ has been changed to the ‘Museum of 2. p.25: LAARC now has a new name, The Museum of London Archaeological London Archaeological Archive’ throughout the Archive (and see refernece on p.26). document 3. p.25: Museum of London Specialist Services disappeared several years ago. 3. ‘Museum of London Specialist Services’ has If you are to retain this sentence, put MOLA; but it may be inappropriate now to been altered to ‘Museum of London Archaeology’ say this. 3 CoLAT (continued) All City Churchyards Statements of Significance The suggested amendments have been These are excellent. incorporated into the text 1. General point: consideration should be given to laying out the outline for parts of parish churches which lie beneath their present churchyards. The extent to which all the churchyards you catalogue can do this could be ascertained. It would be only a few, but it would make the churchyards even more interesting and would constitute a form of memory which is very rare in the City today. 2. Points of historical accuracy: All Hallows by the Tower: in the archaeology paragraph, the 3rd century date is surely wrong and from something else, perhaps the nearby City wall. The church is 11th-century, as you state above. St Bartholomew the Great, archaeology: strictly speaking the excavation of 1987 was not in this area but on the north-east side of the church, where the parish building is now. Amend your sentence, but keep it in. St Benet Fink: the Wren church was decagonal, not octagonal. Perhaps add to the archaeological potential: „The remains of a Wren church of unique plan could be significant.‟ St Botolph Aldersgate: add to the archaeological potential that the Roman and medieval City wall borders the site on the south side, and fragments may survive (explaining your reference to the SAM). St Magnus the Martyr: was in existence by the 11th century, not the 12th. Instead of „(cartographical error?)‟, put „(from the 12th century to 1666, from excavations of the 1970s)‟. This is detailed in your Archaeology paragraph for the church. St Mary le Bow: please add to the Archaeology paragraph that the west end of a vaulted undercroft built shortly after 1276 was recorded immediately west of the tower in 1959 (Grimes). Transport for London All Thank you for consulting Transport for London (TfL) on the Historic Environment No response required Strategy and Enforcement Plan. TfL has no comments on these documents. 4 CgMs – (part of RPS Group) 1. The policy section on pages 5&6, identifies the Archa Please see below the comments to the consultation on Historic Environment national (NPPF), regional (London Plan) and local (Local eology Strategy from the archaeology team at CgMs (part of RPS Group). Plan) policy context for the assessment of significance of Guida designated heritage assets. Paragraphs from the NPPF nce The CgMS (Part of RPS) comments for CoL area as follows: on the assessment of undesignated heritage assets will be added. 1 It would be beneficial if there is guidance on how Roman developments A further document characterising the city‟s in the City are assessed for significance archaeological and historic past is in preparation, and will provide a greater degree of information regarding the 2 There is much emphasis on preservation in-situ, but is this a hangover Roman period. from PPG16, given that it is significance that is now paramount? 2. Where there is potential for archaeological remains of 3 The approach to outreach has no NPPF backing and might be significance, preservation in-situ is a consideration. considered an area of blurred lines Reference to preservation in-situ has been cited where it is considered relevant; however the assessment of 4 There should be a need to require CMIfA membership as RO# significance and archaeological potential of the site is considered in the policy context and impact assessment sections of the document. Several alterations to the text to further emphasise the assessment of significance have been added in response to this comment. 3. Paragraph 141 of the NPPF directs LPAs and developers to both gather and disseminate information about the Historic Environment. Policy DM 12.4 paragraph 3.12.21 of the City of London Local Plan concerns the interpretation and presentation to public of visible or buried remains. It says the „agreement will be sought, where appropriate, to achieved reasonable public access‟. This provides sufficient backing for the guidance outlines in the document. 4. The City of London follows current standards and guidelines for staffing and organisations, but is unable to make CIfa membership a requirement for organisations undertaking work in the City of London. 5 Natural England All No response required. Whilst we welcome this opportunity to give our views, the topic of the Supplementary Planning Document does not appear to relate to our interests to any significant extent. We therefore do not wish to comment. Historic England All Heritage Environment Strategy Historic England welcomes the production of a Heritage Environmental Strategy. In our view, the component elements identified for inclusion within the Strategy will contribute positively to a solid framework for the management of the historic environment through drawing together relevant guidance and advice. The introduction refers to a number of topics including Understanding the The Introduction will be revised to provide greater clarity Historic Environment, a Structure of the Historic Environment SPD, and as regards the content and structure of the Historic Managing Change and the Historic Environment.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES SAINT NICHOLAS, COLE ABBEY: CITY of LONDON P69/NIC2 Page 1 Reference Description Dates PARISH REGIS
    LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 SAINT NICHOLAS, COLE ABBEY: CITY OF LONDON P69/NIC2 Reference Description Dates PARISH REGISTERS P69/NIC2/A/001/MS05685 Register of baptisms 1538/9-1650, marriages 1538/9 - Not available for general access 1584-1650/1 and burials 1538-1647. 1650/1 Please use microfilm 1 volume Former reference: MS 05685 P69/NIC2/A/002/MS05686 Register of baptisms, marriages and burials, 1650/1 - 1695 Not available for general access 1650/1-95 (joint with St Nicholas Olave from Please use microfilm ca.1670). 1 volume Former reference: MS 05686 P69/NIC2/A/003/MS05687 Register of baptisms 1695-1747, marriages 1695 - 1747 Not available for general access 1695-1718, and burials, 1695-1747. Please use microfilm 1 volume Former reference: MS 05687 P69/NIC2/A/004/MS05688 Register of baptisms. 1748 - 1812 Not available for general access Latter half blank. Please use microfilm 1 volume Former reference: MS 05688 P69/NIC2/A/005/MS09359 Register of baptisms. 1813 - 1975 Not available for general access 1 volume Please use microfilm Former reference: MS 09359 P69/NIC2/A/007/MS05689 Register of marriages 1718-53 (joint with St 1718 - 1753 Not available for general access Nicholas Olave from 1721). Please use microfilm 1 volume Former reference: MS 05689 Registers of marriages. P69/NIC2/A/008/MS05690/001 Registers of marriages. 1755 - 1812 Not available for general access 1 volume Please use microfilm Former reference: MS 05690 P69/NIC2/A/008/MS05690/002 Registers of marriages. 1813 - 1837 Not available for general access 1 volume Please use microfilm Former reference: MS 05690 P69/NIC2/A/008/MS05690/003 Registers of marriages.
    [Show full text]
  • ST. PAUL's CATHEDRAL Ex. Par ALL HALLOWS, BERKYNCHIRCHE-BY
    ST. JAMES AND ST. JOHN WITH ST. PETER, CLERKENWELL ST. LEONARD WITH ST. MICHAEL, SHOREDITCH TRINITY, HOLBORN AND ST. BARTHOLOMEW, GRAY'S INN ROAD ST. GILES, CRIPPLEGATE WITH ST. BARTHOLOMEW, MOOR LANE, ST. ALPHAGE, LONDON WALL AND ST. LUKE, OLD STREET WITH ST. MARY, CHARTERHOUSE AND ST. PAUL, CLERKE CHARTERHOUSE ex. par OBURN SQUARE CHRIST CHURCH WITH ALL SAINTS, SPITALF ST. BARTHOLOMEW-THE-GREAT, SMITHFIELD ST. BARTHOLOMEW THE LESS IN THE CITY OF LONDON ST. BOTOLPH WITHOUT BISHOPSGATE ST. SEPULCHRE WITH CHRIST CHURCH, GREYFRIARS AND ST. LEONARD, FOSTER LANE OTHBURY AND ST. STEPHEN, COLEMAN STREET WITH ST. CHRISTOPHER LE STOCKS, ST. BARTHOLOMEW-BY-THE-EXCHANGE, ST. OLAVE, OLD JEWRY, ST. MARTIN POMEROY, ST. MILD ST. HELEN, BISHOPSGATE WITH ST. ANDREW UNDERSHAFT AND ST. ETHELBURGA, BISHOPSGATE AND ST. MARTIN OUTWICH AND ST. PAUL'S CATHEDRAL ex. par ST. BOTOLPH, ALDGATE AND HOLY TRINITY, MINORIES ST. EDMUND-THE-KING & ST. MARY WOOLNOTH W ST. NICHOLAS ACONS, ALL HALLOWS, LOMBARD STREET ST. BENET, GRACECHURCH, ST. LEONARD, EASTCHEAP, ST. DONIS, BA ST. ANDREW-BY-THE-WARDROBE WITH ST. ANN BLACKFRIARS ST. CLEMENT, EASTCHEAP WITH ST. MARTIN ORGAR ST. JAMES GARLICKHYTHE WITH ST. MICHAEL QUEENHITHE AND HOLY TRINITY-THE-LESS T OF THE SAVOY ex. par ALL HALLOWS, BERKYNCHIRCHE-BY-THE-TOWER WITH ST. DUNSTAN-IN-THE-EAST WITH ST. CLEMENT DANES det. 1 THE TOWER OF LONDON ST. PETER, LONDON D Copyright acknowledgements These maps were prepared from a variety of data sources which are subject to copyright. Census data Source: National Statistics website: www.statistics.gov.uk
    [Show full text]
  • Churchyard Enhancement Programme Emerging High Priority Churchyards and Other Work Streams Appendix 2
    Churchyard Enhancement Programme Emerging High priority churchyards and other work streams Appendix 2 Top 11 High Priority Churchyards Large scale landscape improvements Name Comments Under-utilised space with opportunities for increased greenery and seating as well as step-free access. Concept design has already been developed. St Helen’s Bishopsgate Possible to align with 22 Bishopsgate programme. Contingent on a maintenance agreement with CoL. Within ECC Area Strategy Large space with plentiful trees and greenery. Some issues exist with anti-social behaviour and accessibility. Opportunity to re-landscape to resolve St Anne & St Agnes issues and increase amenity value. In the vicinity of St Pauls Gyratory project (in design development). Adjacent to the Culture Mile and close to the planned Centre for Music. Largest of the City Churchyards. Numerous spaces of varying design and character. Extremely well-used which puts pressure on pathways and seating. St Paul’s Cathedral Some re-landscaping would resolve issues, refresh planting and enhance amenity. Coordination required with the Cathedral’s programme of works. Part of the emerging St Pauls Area Strategy. Popular space in need of some re-landscaping. May be possible to introduce step-free access from Cloth St Bartholomew the Great Fair. Railings are in need of repair. Within the Culture Mile. Small space in poor condition that would benefit from re-landscaping. Possible to introduce railings St Mary Aldermary and gates to resolve anti-social behaviour problems. Commercial activity issues need to be resolved/regularised Good size space that is currently under-utilised. Some re-landscaping would increase amenity value St Olave Silver Street and seating opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwert Yuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiop
    qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertJune 20, 2014 yuiopasdf ghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiop asdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfg hjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzx MY SEARCH FOR THE ORIGINS OF cvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnDEACON JOHN DONE mqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwePresented to The Doane Family Association Research Committee rtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuio by pasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdf Maureen Scott Committee Member ghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklz 2014 xcvbnmqwertyuiop asdfghjklzxcvbn mqwertyDuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmq wertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwerty uiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopa sdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghj klzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv bnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwert1 yuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiop June 20, 2014 Table of Contents Preamble:....................................................................................................pg. 3 Sections: 1 - The City of London and Its People..........................................................pg. 4 2 - City of London Pilgrims...........................................................................pg. .9 3 - PossiBle Links with Deacon John Done..................................................pg. 11 4 - Previous Lines of Inquiry........................................................................pg. 16 5 - Y-DNA Project.........................................................................................pg. 19 Summary / Recommendations:.................................................................pg. 20 References:................................................................................................pg.
    [Show full text]
  • Songs and Music of the City of London: a New Pocket Guide to the City of London’S Contemporary Activities Involving Music in All Its Facets
    June 2021 Dear Clerks to the several City of London Livery Companies, Following the culmination of a two-year project, we are pleased to announce the publication of Songs and Music of the City of London: a new pocket guide to the City of London’s contemporary activities involving music in all its facets. We are delighted that Alderman Sir Andrew Parmley, Lord Mayor of London (2016-17), has written the Foreword. The guide covers education, performance and composition of music, whether in the City’s churches, schools, in the Barbican Centre, on the City’s streets such as during the Lord Mayor’s Show, or through sponsorship by the Livery Companies through education and awards. It also includes the various anthems, songs and sung graces of the City’s Livery Companies. In our research for content, we have been constantly surprised at every turn by such a rich abundance of musical talent, events, venues, and performing groups concentrated in such a small geographic area. In our belief that hitherto no single existing publication has captured the immense array of ways in which the City benefits wider society through the medium of music, the aim of our guide is to fill this gap by means of a concise, accessible guide for all. The publication takes the form of a pocket guide, equally suited to the needs of the tourist, the City worker, and those among the Livery Companies and affiliated organisations who have an interest in the musical events and activities within the City. The material is intended for a generalist audience rather than the music aficionado.
    [Show full text]
  • North London Walkers
    North London Walking Club ‘Oranges & Lemons’ The City Church Trail Permanent Trail No.142 11 Kilometres Start:- Tower Hill Tube Station (Circle & District Lines) Upon exiting the station go to the right of, and around, Trinity Gardens. Q1 – On top of Trinity House there is a weather vane, what does it depict? At the end of Trinity Gardens turn right along Byward Street. When you are opposite the entrance of All Hallows-Barking turn right into Seething Lane, passing the Corn Exchange. At the end turn left into Hart Street, St.Olave’s Hart Street, and then turn right into Mark Lane, All Hallows Staining, at the end of Mark Lane turn left into Fenchurch Street. Take the second left, Rood Lane, St.Margaret Pattens, and at the end cross over into St.Mary-at-Hill. Halfway down St.Mary-at-Hill, St.Mary-at-Hill, turn left into Dunstans Lane, St.Dunstan’s in the East. Then turn right down St.Dunstans Hill, at the bottom turn right along Lower Thames Street, passing Custom House and Old Billingsgate Fish Market, until you come to: St.Magnus the Martyr Turn right here and go up Fish Street Hill, passing the Monument, at the end turn left into Eastcheap, cross over the junction and go along King William Street taking the first right into Clements Lane, St.Clements Eastcheap. At the end turn left into Lombard Street, St.Edmund King & Martyr, go along Lombard Street to St.Mary Woolnoth. Q2 – On Lombard Street, adjacent to Pope’s Head Alley, opposite St.Mary Woolnoth there is a blue plaque, who does it commemorate and why? Cross over King William Street and into St.Swithins Lane and then right into Mansion House place.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of the Churches in the London Metropolitan Area Described in the Trollope Manuscript
    Index of the churches in the London metropolitan area described in the Trollope manuscript Chapter 8: London Bells and Bell Towers fills volumes 4 – 6 of the manuscript. The list below is based on Trollope’s index to these volumes, but generally omits incidental references, pointing only to the specific articles on an individual tower. As the work was written in the 1930s, an indication of current status is provided: churches with ringing bells in 2018 are in bold type, an asterisk denoting a replacement ring. Lost towers are in italic. Paul Norman Librarian, Middlesex County Association & London Diocesan Guild March 2018 Volume 4 A: City of London St Paul’s Cathedral ................................................................................................. 340 All Hallows the Great (demolished 1876-1894) .............................................................. 356 All Hallows the Less (destroyed 1666) ............................................................................ 359 All Hallows Barking* (18 bell carillon) ............................................................................ 360 All Hallows Bread Street (demolished 1879) .................................................................. 373 All Hallows Grass Church, Lombard Street (Demolished 1938-39) Tower & bells now at All Hallows Twickenham...................................................... 377 Drawing of the tower ..................................................................................after page 615 All Hallows Honey Lane (destroyed
    [Show full text]
  • London Metropolitan Archives Saint Andrew
    LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 SAINT ANDREW UNDERSHAFT: CITY OF LONDON P69/AND4 Reference Description Dates PARISH REGISTERS Registers of baptisms and burials 1558-1770, and marriages 1558-1753. P69/AND4/A/001/MS04107/001 Register of baptisms, marriages and burials. 1558-1634 Not available for general access 1 volume available online via Former Reference: MS 04107 www.ancestry.co.uk P69/AND4/A/001/MS04107/002 Register of baptisms, marriages and burials. 1634-1692 Not available for general access 1 volume available online via Former Reference: MS 04107 www.ancestry.co.uk P69/AND4/A/001/MS04107/003 Register of baptisms, marriages and burials. 1692-1770 Not available for general access 1 volume available online via Former Reference: MS 04107 www.ancestry.co.uk P69/AND4/A/002/MS04108 Register of baptisms and burials. 1771-1812 Not available for general access 1 volume Please use microfilm Former Reference: MS 04108 Microfilm available available online via www.ancestry.co.uk Registers of baptisms. P69/AND4/A/003/MS04110/001 Register of baptisms. 1813-1846 Not available for general access 1 volume available online via Former Reference: MS 04110 www.ancestry.co.uk P69/AND4/A/003/MS04110/002 Register of baptisms. 1847-1901 Not available for general access 1 volume available online via Former Reference: MS 04110 www.ancestry.co.uk P69/AND4/A/004/MS04114 Rough register of baptisms 1742-64, marriages 1742-1774 Not available for general access 1743-53 and burials 1742-74. Please use microfilm The order of entries is as follows: baptisms Microfilm available 1742-61, marriages 1744-53, baptisms 1761-4 available online via (inverted), burials 1742-50 (inverted), marriages www.ancestry.co.uk 1743-4, burials 1751-74, rough account of fees received 1757-8.
    [Show full text]
  • London View Management Framework Supplementary Planning Guidance March 2012 London Plan 2011 Implementation Framework
    LONDON VIEW MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING GUIDANCE MARCH 2012 LONDON PLAN 2011 IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORK LONDON VIEW MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING GUIDANCE MARCH 2012 GREATER LONDON AUTHORITY MARCH 2012 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN 978-1-84781-492-0 Copies of this report are available from www.london.gov.uk Crown Copyright and Database Right 2012 Ordnance Survey 100032216 GLA Printed on Evolution Satin paper: 75 per cent recycled fibre content; 25 per cent virgin fibre, 10 per cent FSC sourced; FSC and NAPM certified. AVR images in Appendix C of this document are © Miller Hare and Hayes Davidson. Aerial views in Appendix D incorporate London 3D model data created and licensed by Zmapping Ltd. Maps in this SPG are reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. © Crown Copyright and database right 2012. Ordnance Survey 100032216 GLA Contents iii Foreword by Boris Johnson, Mayor of London v 1 Introduction 1 2 Conformity with Local Policies 5 3 Assessment Process and Consultation 7 4 View Management 17 5 Visual Management Guidance 29 Management Plans: London Panoramas 35 1 London Panorama: Alexandra Palace 37 2 London Panorama: Parliament Hill 43 3 London Panorama: Kenwood 53 4 London Panorama: Primrose Hill 59 5 London Panorama: Greenwich Park 65 6 London Panorama: Blackheath Point 71 Management
    [Show full text]
  • Churchyards Enhancement Programme Public Consultation 2 October - 17 November 2017 Consultation Report
    Churchyards Enhancement Programme Public Consultation 2 October - 17 November 2017 Consultation Report Churchyards Enhancement Programme | 1 Churchyards Enhancement Programme | 2 Contents 1| Introduction Appendix| Consultation response overviews: • Postcards 2| The Churchyards Enhancement Programme • Emails • Online User Survey 3| Methodology • Living Streets User Survey • Archikids User Survey 4| Q1: What do you most value about the City • Heritage consultation overview Churchyards? Consultation material: 5| Q2: What would you like to change? • Survey Boards • Other consultation material 6| Q3: How can we better connect the City Churchyards? 7| Q4: How can we increase the amenity value of the City Churchyards? 8| Summary Findings 9| Next steps Churchyards Enhancement Programme | 3 1. Introduction This report documents and summarises the feedback received from the public consultation, which took place 2nd October - 17th November 2017. The purpose of the public consultation was to gather feedback on issues and aspirations for the City churchyards, informing priorities and the future development of the programme. The consultation was carried through drop-in sessions, user surveys and stakeholder meetings, receiving a total of 480 responses. Prior to the public consultation, a workshop with key stakeholders took place in June 2017. This was held to understand the perspectives of key landowners and decision-makers from the City and church community. The following pages provide an overview of the Churchyards Enhancement Programme and the methods used in the public consultation, before summarising the key themes and ideas highlighted. These will inform the next stages of the programme, in prioritising churchyards for enhancement and in progressing work streams to look at particular issues and aspirations across churchyards in a consistent and holistic manner.
    [Show full text]
  • London Metropolitan Archives Saint
    LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 SAINT PAUL'S CATHEDRAL: DEAN AND CHAPTER CLC/313 Reference Description Dates CHARTERS Original and copy royal charters and other items, ca1099-1685 (UNCATALOGUED) CLC/313/A/002/MS08762 Charter by King Edward III to St Paul's [1338] June 5 Available only with advance Cathedral, being an inspeximus of grants by In Latin, and notice and at the discretion of the previous monarchs Anglo-Saxon LMA Director Historiated initial letter shows sovereign handing the charter to St Paul. From the initial springs an illuminated bar border with foliage sprays. Not deposited by St Paul's Cathedral. Purchased by Guildhall Library in 1967 1 membrane; fragment of Great Seal on original cord in seal bag Former Reference: MS 08762 CLC/313/A/003/MS11975 Conge d'elire from George III to the Dean and 1764 May 25 Chapter of St Paul's Cathedral for the election of Richard Terrick, bishop of Peterborough, to the see of London Deposited by the London Diocesan Registry 1 sheet Former Reference: MS 11975 CLC/313/A/004/MS25183 Copy of petition from the Dean and Chapter of [1371? - 1435? St Paul's Cathedral to the Crown requesting ] grant of letters patent In French Original reference: A53/25. Undated (late 14th or early 15th century) 1 roll, parchment Former Reference: MS 25183 A53:25 CLC/313/A/005/MS25272 Charter roll, probably compiled during the late [1270 - 1299?] 13th century, recording thirty 11th and 12th In Latin and century royal writs granted to the Cathedral English See Marion Gibbs, "Early Charters of the Cathedral Church of St.
    [Show full text]
  • 100, 106-107 Leadenhall Street in the City of London Planning Application No
    planning report GLA/4417/02 13 August 2018 100, 106-107 Leadenhall Street in the City of London planning application no. 18/00152/FULEIA Strategic planning application stage II referral Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended); Greater London Authority Acts 1999 and 2007; Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008. The proposal Demolition of existing buildings and construction of a ground plus 56 storey building (263.4 metres AOD) for office use, retail use at lower levels, a publicly accessible viewing gallery and restaurant/bar at levels 55/56. The applicant The applicant is Frontier Dragon Ltd, and the architects are Skidmore, Ownings and Merrill LLP. Key dates Pre- application meeting: 18 October 2017 Stage 1 report: 16 April 2018 City of London Corporation Committee meeting: 10 July 2018 Strategic issues update Mix of uses: The publicly accessible viewing gallery has been secured. Urban Design: Issues regarding street scene and public realm have been addressed. Historic Environment: The development would not compromise the ability to appreciate the Outstanding Universal Value of World Heritage Sites and would not cause harm to the historic environment. Transport: Conditions and obligations secured including circa £12 million contribution to Crossrail. Climate change: outstanding issues resolved. The Council’s decision In this instance the City of London Corporation has resolved to grant planning permission. Recommendation That the City of London be advised that the Mayor is content for it to determine the case itself, subject to any action that the Secretary of State may take, and does not therefore wish to direct refusal or direct that he is to be the local planning authority.
    [Show full text]