Landfill Closure & Rehabilitation Management Plan August 2016

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Veolia Environmental Services Pty Ltd Woodlawn Bioreactor Landfill Closure and Rehabilitation Management Plan 9 AUGUST 2016 Woodlawn Bioreactor Revision 2 Landfill Closure and Rehabilitation Management Plan August 2016 Page 1 of 31 Woodlawn Bioreactor Landfill Closure and Rehabilitation Management Plan Revision Revision Date Details 1 May 2007 2 8 August 2016 Revised to incorporate PA 10_0012 Woodlawn Bioreactor Revision E Post Closure Landfill Rehabilitation Management Plan May 2007 Page 2 of 31 Table of Contents Table of Contents 4 1 Introduction 5 1.1 Overview 6 1.2 Background 6 1.3 Objective 7 1.3.1 Licence for Closure Management 8 1.4 Site Description 8 2 Post Closure Environmental Monitoring 10 2.1 Site Closure 11 2.1.1 Revegetation 11 2.1.2 Stormwater 11 2.1.3 ED3 Management 11 2.1.4 Leachate 11 2.1.5 Groundwater 12 2.1.6 Landfill Gas 12 3 Site Rehabilitation Plan – Post Closure Management 13 3.1 Introduction 14 3.2 Objectives 14 3.3 Monitoring And Maintenance 14 3.3.1 Introduction 14 3.4 Records And Reporting 15 3.4.1 Monitoring Results 15 3.4.2 Records of Pollution Complaints 15 3.5 Staffing And Training Requirements 16 3.6 Environmental Review 16 3.7 Management System Audits 16 4 Financial Assurances 17 1.1 Bioreactor Rehabilitation 18 4.1 18 4.2 Whole of Mine Site Rehabilitation 18 5 Closure Strategies 19 5.1 Early Closure strategies 20 5.1.1 Early Closure Strategies: Mine Void 20 5.1.2 Early closure strategy: ED3 22 5.1.3 Maintenance 22 5.2 Final Closure of Bioreactor 23 5.2.1 Mine void 23 5.2.2 ED3 23 5.2.3 Rehabilitation of Plant/Office Area 23 6 Rehabilitation Standards and Schedule 25 6.1 Site Capping 26 6.2 Revegetation 26 6.3 ED3 28 6.4 Site Decommissioning 28 6.5 Rehabilitation Schedule 28 Woodlawn Bioreactor Revision E Post Closure Landfill Rehabilitation Management Plan May 2007 Page 3 of 31 Table of Contents 7 Integration of Rehabilitation Works 29 8 References 31 List of Figures Figure 10407001-560-A Map of Bioreactor Consent and Licence Area Figure 3.15 Proposed Mine Void Surface Water Management Early Closure of Bioreactor – Option 1 Figure 3.16 Proposed Mine Void Surface Water Management Early Closure of Bioreactor – Option 2 Figure 3.17 Proposed Mine Void Surface Water Management Early Closure of Bioreactor – Option 3 Figure 3.18 Proposed Mine Void Surface Water Management Completed Rehabilitated Bioreactor Figure 3.20 Proposed Surface Water Management at Woodlawn Mine Site at Completion of Rehabilitation of Mine Areas Woodlawn Bioreactor Revision E Post Closure Landfill Rehabilitation Management Plan May 2007 Page 4 of 31 1 Introduction Woodlawn Bioreactor Revision D Post Closure Landfill Rehabilitation Management Plan August 2004 Page 5 of 31 1 Introduction 1.1 Overview VES’s Development Consent for the Woodlawn Bioreactor covers the mine void, ED3, an area surrounding the administration buildings for offices and landfill infrastructure such as landfill gas generators. This area is shown in Drawing 10407001-560-A. VES’s EPA Licence for the Woodlawn Bioreactor (Licence number 11436) covers the same area as the Development Consent. This Post Closure Landfill Rehabilitation Management Plan (incorporating the required Rehabilitation Management Plan), covers the area regulated by the Development Consent and EPA Licence (as shown in Drawing 10407001-560-A). VES has taken over ownership of the whole of the Woodlawn property, most of which is covered by Special Mining Lease 20 (SML20). VES now becomes responsible for the rehabilitation of the entire Woodlawn mine site, in addition to the post-closure rehabilitation of the Bioreactor licenced area. The plan for rehabilitation of areas of the Woodlawn site which are outside of VES’s Development Consent are not covered in this Management Plan. The rehabilitation of these other areas (including plant area, tailings dams, ED1 and ED2) is being undertaken in accordance with the Mine Operations Plan (MOP) for Woodlawn Mine, under the guidance of the Mine Rehabilitation Environmental Management Process. For information about rehabilitation of the wider mine site areas outside of VES’s Woodlawn Bioreactor consent area, please refer to the Woodlawn Mine Operations Plan (2004). 1.2 Background This Post Closure Landfill Rehabilitation Management Plan (PCLRMP) describes the proposed post closure management and rehabilitation activities to be undertaken to manage the site following either early or final closure of the site. The site will be managed and maintained in accordance with VES environmental policies and the requirements of regulatory authorities, principally the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA). Note: Under the terms of the current Consent Conditions for the 20 year operation of the site, the mine void will not be filled to the level of the mine void rim. Refer to the Filling Schedule in this LEMP for details of approximate levels expected to be reached based on the maximum input rates in the current Consent Conditions. The Plan has been developed to reflect the requirements of the “Environmental Guidelines: Solid Waste Landfills” (EPA, 1996) and contains references to the Environmental Goals and Benchmark Techniques described in the guidelines. It provides a basis for the EPA to assess the environmental performance of the Woodlawn Bioreactor Revision E Post Closure Landfill Rehabilitation Management Plan May 2007 Page 6 of 31 1 Introduction bioreactor site and to review the management and monitoring activities that are carried out on site. This PCLRMP is based on a continuation of progressive rehabilitation compatible with long term use of the site. The document will be updated periodically in light of new information and new standards for environmental performance. Subsequent to the Development Consent granted for the Woodlawn Bioreactor, VES has taken over responsibility for whole-of-mine site rehabilitation. The involvement of VES in the planning and execution of both the Bioreactor post-closure rehabilitation and the whole-of-mine site rehabilitation will ensure that these rehabilitation efforts are integrated. 1.3 Objective The Plan addresses the rehabilitation and after care management issues associated with stormwater, leachate, biogas, management of ED3 and revegetation for the site. The staging of the rehabilitation works is dependent on the proposed filling plan. The operational phases of these issues are fully described in the Woodlawn Bioreactor Environmental Management Plan (LEMP). The primary objectives of this plan are to meet the requirements of Consent Conditions 15 and 22. These conditions call for the preparation of a PCLRMP and a Rehabilitation Management Plan (RMP) respectively. Due to the similarity between the two plans, they have been combined in one document, while still addressing all of the consent condition requirements. Consent Condition 15 specifies that this PCLRMP will address the following: a) Closure strategies in the event that landfilling activities conclude prior to filling of the mine void b) Site capping and revegetation in accordance with benchmark technique 28 of the Environmental Guidelines: Solid Waste Landfills c) Post closure environmental monitoring d) Post closure management of surface water in the event that the void is not filled with waste e) Post closure management of Evaporation Dam No3 (ED3) f) Post closure leachate management, including the management of the bioreactor processes g) Post closure maintenance h) The estimated costing for these works must be provided and should be based on a nominal period of at least 50 years after the landfill ceases to accept waste. The actual duration of this period will be determined from actual monitoring data at the time. Woodlawn Bioreactor Revision E Post Closure Landfill Rehabilitation Management Plan May 2007 Page 7 of 31 1 Introduction Consent Condition 22 requires the preparation and implementation of a Rehabilitation Management Plan (RMP). The RMP shall address, but not necessarily be limited to the following matters: a) Clear identification of the proposed new rehabilitation works to be undertaken by the Applicant, details of the Woodlawn Mine site rehabilitation works being undertaken by the mine leaseholder, and a clear definition of the respective obligations of the parties; b) An outline of financial arrangements for site rehabilitation works proposed in the plan; c) The rehabilitation standards to be adopted; d) A rehabilitation schedule (to be reviewed on a regular basis); e) A post-establishment maintenance and monitoring program for rehabilitated areas; f) Procedures for the removal of all derelict buildings and infrastructure; g) Closure strategies in the event that landfilling activities conclude prior to the capacity of the mine void being filled; and h) Integration of rehabilitation works with the rehabilitation of the Woodlawn mine site. The Environmental Guidelines (EPA, 1996) adopt a performance based approach. The performance outcomes are defined as Environmental Goals and include Benchmark Techniques appendices. The Benchmark Techniques applicable to rehabilitation and after care have been addressed in this document. 1.3.1 Licence for Closure Management Prior to closure, VES will need to obtain a licence under the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 to cover closure and post closure management of the facility. The Application for the licence by VES will be based on the proposals set out in this PCLRMP to cover post closure management. 1.4 Site Description Bioreactor Site The Woodlawn mine site is located approximately 7km (10km by road) west of the township of Tarago in the Mulwaree LGA. The mine void is located in a 3,000 ha property owned by Veolia Environmental Services Pty Ltd. In addition to the void, the property contains waste rock dumps, tailings dams, evaporation ponds, disused mine buildings and infrastructure and surrounding rural land and pine plantations. Areas of the site subject to the DA include the void, the access road into the site and an area to the northeast of the void where facilities such as a weighbridge and site office will be located, and Evaporation Dam 3 (ED3).
Recommended publications
  • Numerical Model of Leachate Recirculation in Bioreactor Landfills

    Numerical Model of Leachate Recirculation in Bioreactor Landfills

    water Article Numerical Model of Leachate Recirculation in Bioreactor Landfills with High Kitchen Waste Content Peng Zhang , Hailong Liu * , Xingyao Jiang, Hao Lv, Chunyi Cui and Zhen Huyan Department of Civil Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China; [email protected] (P.Z.); [email protected] (X.J.); [email protected] (H.L.); [email protected] (C.C.); [email protected] (Z.H.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Surface spraying, horizontal trenches, and vertical wells are the most common leachate recirculation system used at landfills in engineering practice. In order to quantify the efficiency of the three aforementioned recirculation systems, a hydro–biochem–mechanical-coupled model was developed in the present work, which can describe hydrodynamic and biochemical behaviors in food-waste-rich landfills. A typical landfill cell was modeled in COMSOL. The results indicate that leachate recirculation can accelerate the decomposition of municipal solid waste (MSW) with food- rich waste content, relieving acidification, improving gas generation efficiency, and consequently, increasing the early settlement in landfills. Keywords: municipal solid waste; landfill; leachate treatment; coupled model; numerical simulation Citation: Zhang, P.; Liu, H.; Jiang, X.; 1. Introduction Lv, H.; Cui, C.; Huyan, Z. Numerical Disposing of municipal solid waste (MSW) has been a worldwide environmental Model of Leachate Recirculation in issue for decades. Landfilling is a commonly used MSW management method all around Bioreactor Landfills with High the world [1,2]. Due to the biochemical reaction of degradable components in MSW, the Kitchen Waste Content. Water 2021, releasing of polluted leachate and landfill gas will be a long-term process that may take 13, 1750.
  • Bioreactor Landfills: Experimental and Field Results

    Bioreactor Landfills: Experimental and Field Results

    Waste Management 22 (2002) 7–17 www.elsevier.nl/locate/wasman Bioreactor landfills: experimental and field results Mostafa Warith Ryerson Polytechnic University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5B 2K3 Received 8 August 2000; received in revised form 29 January 2001; accepted 31 January 2001 Abstract Bioreactor landfills allow a more active landfill management that recognizes the biological, chemical and physical processes involved in a landfill environment. This paper presents the results of an experimental study carried out to determine the effect of solid waste size, leachate recirculation and nutrient balance on the rate of municipal solid waste (MSW) biodegradation. Higher rates of MSW biodegradation eventually cause a reduction of the contaminant life span of the landfill and decrease in the cost of long term monitoring. The study indicated that the smaller the size of the MSW the faster the biodegradation rate of the waste. In addition, the paper presents the results of leachate recirculation on solid waste biodegradation in a full-scale landfill site, which is located in Nepean, Ontario, Canada. The leachate was recirculated into the landfilled solid waste for 8 years through infiltration lagoons. Similar results to those obtained in the laboratory scale experiments were noted. The average pH of the leachate in the early stages of recirculation was on the acidic range of the pH scale, however, the pH value was in the range of 7–8 after 2 years of leachate recirculation. The concentration of chloride remained fairly constant at about 1000 mg/l during the leachate recirculation period. A decreasing trend of the organic load, measured as biological oxygen demand and chemical oxygen demand, was observed.
  • Joint Technical Document, MSW Landfill B-19, Kettleman Hills

    Joint Technical Document, MSW Landfill B-19, Kettleman Hills

    JOINT TECHNICAL DOCUMENT MSW LANDFILL B-19, KETTLEMAN HILLS FACILITY KINGS COUNTY, CALIFORNIA VOLUME 1 OF 2 June 2016 Prepared for: Chemical Waste Management, Inc. 35251 Old Skyline Road Kettleman City, California 93239 Original prepared by: EMCON/OWT, Inc. 1326 North Market Boulevard Sacramento, California 95834-1912 Project No.: 833760.02000000 JOINT TECHNICAL DOCUMENT MSW LANDFILL B-19, KETTLEMAN HILLS FACILITY KINGS COUNTY, CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION This revision to the JTD was prepared under the supervision and direction of the undersigned. This report was prepared consistent with current and generally accepted geologic and environmental consulting principles and practices that are within the limitations provide herein. Scott Sumner, P.E. Engineering Manager, RCE 49769 B-19 JTD JUNE 2016 ii Table of Contents ________________________________________________ Title Page ............................................ ……………………………………………………………………………... i Professional Engineering Certification ……………………………………………………………………………... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................... vii List of Appendices ........................................................................................................................................ vii CalRecycle/SWB Index………………………………………………………………………………………………viii 1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................
  • Bioreactor Brochure

    Bioreactor Brochure

    City of Columbia, Missouri Glossary of Terms Questions? Public Works Department Aerobic: living or existing in the presence of oxygen For more information, visit our web page at Airspace: the available space in a cell where trash is placed www.GoColumbiaMo.com (GoLandfill) or call the for disposal Solid Waste Division at 573-874-6290. BIOREACTOR Anaerobic: living or existing in the absence of free oxygen LANDFILL Bioreactor: a controlled landfill or landfill disposal cell MORE INFO: US EPA where liquid and gas conditions are actively managed in WASTE STABILIZATION order to accelerate or enhance biostabilization of waste GENERAL: http://www.epa.gov/garbage/landfill/bioreactors. Biosolids: treated residuals from wastewater treatment htm facilities The City of Columbia Public Works Cell: a contained area of the landfill where waste is SPECIFIC: deposited http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/nonhw/muncpl/ Department has begun planning for landfill/biowork/index.htm the next sanitary landfill disposal cell. Inorganic: being or composed of matter other than plant As part of this planning process, or animal bioreactor technology is being ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS examined as a means to accelerate LCS: leachate collection system waste biostabilization. We thank the following individuals and Leachate: liquid that filters through MSW organizations for contributions to this brochure. LFG: landfill gas Camp Dresser and McKee Inc. Liner: an engineered impermeable barrier at the bottom of Engineering Consulting Firm the landfill cell to prevent liquid from leaving the landfill University of Missouri Methane: a colorless, odorless, flammable gas produced by Dr. John Bowders decomposition of organic matter Civil Engineering Department MSW: municipal solid waste Organic: relating to or derived from living things (plant or animals), containing carbon compounds City of Columbia Post Closure: covers a regulated (currently 30 years) Public Works Department period after waste is last accepted when the owner is Solid Waste Division financially obligated to maintain the area to the designed P.
  • Permitting of Landfill Bioreactor Operations: Ten Years After the RD&D Rule

    Permitting of Landfill Bioreactor Operations: Ten Years After the RD&D Rule

    EPA/600/R-14/335| September 2014 | www.epa.gov/ord Permitting of Landfill Bioreactor Operations: Ten Years after the RD&D Rule Office of Research and Development [This page intentionally left blank.] EPA/600/R-14/335 Permitting of Landfill Bioreactor Operations: Ten Years after the RD&D Rule U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development National Risk Management Research Laboratory Land Remediation and Pollution Control Division Waste Management Branch Cincinnati Ohio Permitting of Landfill Bioreactor Operations: Ten Years after the RD&D Rule EPA/600/R-14/335 Notice This research was funded by the National Risk Management Research Laboratory (NRMRL) of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Research and Development (ORD) under the Sustainable and Healthy Communities Research Program. This report was prepared by Geosyntec Consultants of Columbia, Maryland under subcontract to RTI International of Research Triangle, North Carolina. Work was performed in accordance with the Performance Work Statement issued by ORD under Task Order #11 of EPA Contract EP-C-11-036. i Permitting of Landfill Bioreactor Operations: Ten Years after the RD&D Rule EPA/600/R-14/335 Foreword The US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) is charged by Congress with protecting the Nation’s land, air, and water resources. Under a mandate of national environmental laws, the Agency strives to formulate and implement actions leading to a compatible balance between human activities and the ability of natural systems to support and nurture life. To meet this mandate, US EPA’s research program is providing data and technical support for solving environmental problems today and building a science knowledge base necessary to manage our ecological resources wisely, understand how pollutants affect our health, and prevent or reduce environmental risks in the future.
  • An Environmental Evaluation of Landfill Systems Case Study from Two Landfills in South Sweden

    An Environmental Evaluation of Landfill Systems Case Study from Two Landfills in South Sweden

    An Environmental Evaluation of Landfill Systems Case Study from Two Landfills in South Sweden Kuang -Ling Hsiao Supervisor Torleif Bramryd Thesis for the fulfilment of the Master of Science in Environmental Science Lund, Sweden, November 2001 ABSTRACT With the increasing environmental cancerns, the demand of waste management is switching from a problem solution to an integrated system of technical, ecological and economical cooperation. The present landfill technologies are the modem landfills, the biocell landfills, and the bioreactor landfills. Though the use of bioreactors techniques, a landfill site is regarded as a biological treatment and therefore is considered to be an alternative for the landfill management. In this study, two landfill sites in south Sweden is addressed for a better understanding of the landfill technologies. The landfill site owned by Sysav Company in Malmö with the modem landfill technology is compared to the other landfill site in Filborna, owned by the Nordvästra Skånes RenhålInings Company, with a bioreactor technology. For a comparison study of the environmental performance by different landfill techniques in each case, an evaluation system is developed. The environmental performance of each case is evaluated with an index consisting of four impact categories, namely air emission, water contamination, ecological impacts and human health risks. A further environmental evaluation is made accordingly. The result of the study shows that both technologies can reach a rather good gas production for energy recovery at present while the bioreactor technology has a better environmental performance campare to the modem landfill technology in a long-term perspective. Moreover, the design of future waste management should not be tied to a single technological solution.
  • Bioreactor Landfills – an Innovative Technology for Biostabilization of Municipal Solid Waste

    Bioreactor Landfills – an Innovative Technology for Biostabilization of Municipal Solid Waste

    Bioreactor Landfills – An Innovative Technology for Biostabilization of Municipal Solid Waste Nandana Perera, Don Davies, Stantec Consulting Ltd. David van Everdingen, Jasna Hundal, City of Calgary Patrick Hettiaratchi, University of Calgary Outline • Municipal Solid Waste • Waste biostabilization in a landfill • Bioreactor Landfills - Introduction • Conventional vs. Bioreactor Landfills • Case Study – City of Calgary Sustainable Landfill Bio-cell -Design - Construction - Cell filling - Operation/monitoring Municipal Solid Waste • Approximately 70% of the waste currently landfilled is organic - Yard waste (24%), Food waste (20%), Paper (27%) • Up to 75% of MSW generated in the region is disposed to landfills • Decomposition of organic component of MSW in landfills- landfill gas and leachate are generated • Landfills try to reduce impacts from leachate and landfill gas • Conventional landfills use dry tomb approach Waste Biostabilization Phases of MSW Decomposition in a Landfill Bioreactor Landfills – An Introduction • Designed/operated to ensure favourable conditions are created for rapid biodegradation of organic waste, landfills as “treatment vessels” • The most significant factor affecting waste biodegradation - moisture • Leachate recirculation • Operated near the field capacity of the waste • Could be anaerobic, aerobic or a combination Anaerobic Bioreactor Landfill Source: Waste Management Inc. Aerobic Bioreactor Landfill Source: Waste Management Inc. Conventional vs. Bioreactor Landfills • Conventional landfills - “dry tomb” philosophy
  • Yolo County Central Landfill

    Yolo County Central Landfill

    FULL SCALE LANDFILL BIOREACTOR PROJECT AT THE YOLO COUNTY CENTRAL LANDFILL Final Report Principal Author(s) Ramin Yazdani, Assistant Director, Yolo County Public Works, California Jeff Kieffer, Associate Civil Engineer, Yolo County Public Works, California Heather Akau, Junior Engineer, Yolo County Public Works, California Date Report Issued April 2002 CIWMB Award Number IWM-C9050 Name and Address of Submitting Organization Yolo County, Planning and Public Works Department Attn: Ramin Yazdani 292 West Beamer Street Woodland, CA 95695 DISCLAIMER The statements and conclusions of this report are those of the contractor and not necessarily those of the California Integrated Waste Management Board, its employees, or the State of California. The State makes no Warranty, express or implied, and assumes no liability for the information contained in the succeeding text ABSTRACT The Yolo County Department of Planning and Public Works is constructing a full-scale bioreactor landfill as a part of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Project XL program to develop innovative approaches while providing superior environmental protection. The overall objective is to manage landfill solid waste for rapid waste decomposition, maximum landfill gas generation and capture, and minimum long-term environmental consequences. Waste decomposition is accelerated by improving conditions for either the aerobic or anaerobic biological processes and involves circulating controlled quantities of liquid (leachate, groundwater, gray water, etc.), and, in the aerobic process, large volumes of air. The first phase of the project entails the construction of a 12-acre module that contains a 6-acre anaerobic cell, a 3.5-acre anaerobic cell, and a 2.5-acre aerobic cell at the Yolo County Central Landfill near Davis, California.
  • LANDFILL MINING : Institutional Challenges for the Implementation

    LANDFILL MINING : Institutional Challenges for the Implementation

    Linköping Studies in Science and Technology Dissertation No. 1799 LANDFILL MINING Institutional challenges for the implementation of resource extraction from waste deposits Nils Johansson Environmental Technology and Management Department of Management and Engineering Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden Linköping, 2016 © Nils Johansson, 2016 Landfill mining: Institutional challenges for the implementation of resource extraction from waste deposits Linköping Studies in Science and Technology Dissertations, No. 1799 ISSN: 0345-7524 ISBN: 978-91-7685-657-4 Printed in Sweden by LiU–Tryck, Linköping 2016 Distributed by: Linköping University Department of Management and Engineering SE–581 81 Linköping, Sweden Phone: +46 13 281 000 ABSTRACT Landfill mining is a term to describe the emerging field of exploring and extracting disposed material. The recovery of deposited resources may increase the flows of secondary resources and thereby replace a significant share of the primary production. The extraction of deposited materials may also be integrated with remediation and after care measures, to handle the many problematic landfills. Such unconventional recycling practices are, however, currently limited. The research in the field has mainly focused on technical evaluations of sorting efficiency, economic feasibility, and resource and environmental potential. Other issues of concern to institutions, markets, policy and conflict of interest have received considerably less attention. This thesis consists of five scientific articles that have been synthesized. The overall aim of the thesis is to examine the institutional conditions for the implementation and emergence of landfill mining. This is addressed by three research questions. The first question concerns how policies come into play in a landfill mining operation and its consequences for the implementation and emergence of landfill mining.
  • Facultative Bioreactor Landfill: an Environmental and Geotechnical Study

    Facultative Bioreactor Landfill: an Environmental and Geotechnical Study

    University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations Dissertations and Theses 8-7-2003 Facultative Bioreactor Landfill: An Environmental and Geotechnical Study Ricardo DeAbreu University of New Orleans Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td Recommended Citation DeAbreu, Ricardo, "Facultative Bioreactor Landfill: An Environmental and Geotechnical Study" (2003). University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations. 39. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/39 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by ScholarWorks@UNO with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FACULTATIVE BIOREACTOR LANDFILL: AN ENVIRONMENTAL AND GEOTECHNICAL STUDY A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of New Orleans in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Engineering and Applied Sciences Program by Ricardo Coelho de Abreu B.S., Universidade de Sao Paulo, 1994 M.S., Universidade de Sao Paulo, 2000 August 2003 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work would not have been possible without the help of many people who shared their enthusiasm with me in the two years of this research project.
  • Geotechnical Aspects of Bioreactor Landfills

    Geotechnical Aspects of Bioreactor Landfills

    IGC 2006, 14-16 December 2006, Chennai, INDIA GEOINDEX GEOTECHNICAL ASPECTS OF BIOREACTOR LANDFILLS Krishna R. Reddy Department of Civil and Materials Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago,USA, [email protected] ABSTRACT: Currently, there are more than three thousand landfills in the United States in which approximately 55% of the municipal solid waste (MSW) generated is being disposed. The majority of these landfills are designed on the premise that liquid generation should be minimized through the design of liner, leachate collection and removal, and final cover systems. Recently, “bioreactor” landfills are being designed on the contrasting premise that leachate recycling, water addition, and other operating strategies should induce an enhanced environment for biochemical degradation of MSW. Bioreactor landfills are receiving a great deal of attention from environmental professionals because they offer a sustainable way to achieve increased waste degradation along with benefits such as reduction in leachate pollution potential and rapid increase in landfill volumetric capacity. They also offer significant reductions in post-closure management as a result of a reduced period for landfill leachate and gas generation and improved potential for more rapid land reuse for a recreational facility or industrial park. The design of bioreactor landfills requires a careful assessment of several engineering issues such as leachate/moisture distribution, waste degradation and gas generation, waste settlement, and stability of waste slopes. This paper first discusses these issues and then describes the selected historic and current bioreactor demonstration projects. Finally, this paper outlines additional research needed to design and operate bioreactor landfills for effective stabilization of MSW. 1.
  • Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council

    Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council

    INTERSTATE TECHNOLOGY & REGULATORY COUNCIL Warning! This document has not been amended since publication. Some content may be out of date and may no longer apply. INTERSTATE TECHNOLOGY & REGULATORY COUNCIL Technical/Regulatory Guideline Characterization, Design, Construction, and Monitoring of Bioreactor Landfills February 2006 Prepared by The Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council Alternative Landfill Technologies Team ABOUT ITRC Established in 1995, the Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council (ITRC) is a state-led, national coalition of personnel from the environmental regulatory agencies of some 40 states and the District of Columbia, three federal agencies, tribes, and public and industry stakeholders. The organization is devoted to reducing barriers to, and speeding interstate deployment of, better, more cost-effective, innovative environmental techniques. ITRC operates as a committee of the Environmental Research Institute of the States (ERIS), a Section 501(c)(3) public charity that supports the Environmental Council of the States (ECOS) through its educational and research activities aimed at improving the environment in the United States and providing a forum for state environmental policy makers. More information about ITRC and its available products and services can be found on the Internet at www.itrcweb.org. DISCLAIMER This document is designed to help regulators and others develop a consistent approach to their evaluation, regulatory approval, and deployment of specific technologies at specific sites. Although the information in this document is believed to be reliable and accurate, this document and all material set forth herein are provided without warranties of any kind, either express or implied, including but not limited to warranties of the accuracy or completeness of information contained in the document.