Vol. 94, No. 1: Full Issue
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Things to Do in the Digital Afterlife When You're Dead
THINGS TO DO IN THE DIGITAL AFTERLIFE WHEN YOU'RE DEAD Dan Buzzo There are currently few procedures or public awareness about what happens to online digital identities after death. This paper discusses what happens with personal electronic information after death and looks to what is argued to be the rapidly approaching digital Afterlife. This afterlife of new emergent be- haviour offers a challenge of almost unimaginable scope to the creative vision of Artists, Philosophers, Technologists and Cultural thinkers. Introduction As more people live increasing amounts of their lives online the issues associated with physical death in the digital realm are becoming pressingly visible. Year by year deceased users leave behind petabytes of seemingly ‘immortal’ data. Yet despite growing amounts of such legacy data there is currently little legal or cultural precedent as to how to treat the personal data of dead users. “five billion images and counting on Flickr; hundreds of thousands of YouTube videos uploaded every day; oceans of content from 20 million bloggers and 500 million Facebook members; two billion tweets a month.” [1] “One and a half million Facebook users die each year. Twitter faces a similar mortality rate. It's a grow- ing problem for the social-networking sites - and often even more so for the relatives left behind. “ [2] “We feel comfortable saying that 375,000 US based Facebook users will die this year and nearly 1.5m will die worldwide. That’s 3 per minute!” [3] The industry giants have, it could be argued, largely ignored or evaded the discussion of how to deal with legacy data. -
Annual Report for Academic Year 2008-2009
Annual Report for Academic Year 2008-2009 Executive Summary As with other academic organizations at Harvard and beyond, the Berkman Center was deeply affected by the financial crisis. We adjusted to the challenging financial context by evaluating our core structure and functioning, streamlining our activities, tightening our budget, and intensifying our fundraising efforts. We sought to develop new efficiencies and partnerships to ameliorate the effects of the crisis and to produce the very best scholarship with impact. The 2008-2009 academic year built upon the momentum of Berkman@10, the Center’s tenth anniversary celebration and an inflection point in our evolution. This year saw Berkman step into its future as a University-wide and collaborative organization, with a focus on institution- building efforts, including reorganizing our fellows program, strengthening our core team’s integration with projects, and fundraising aggressively. These activities are foundational to our efforts to create multidisciplinary collaborations in support of substantial new methodologies and research, and the teaching and engagement they inform. A leadership change In January, longtime Berkman partner and Faculty Fellow Urs Gasser (formerly a professor of law at the University of St. Gallen in Switzerland) started in his new role as Executive Director, replacing John Palfrey, who was appointed Vice Dean, Library and Information Resources, at Harvard Law School in 2008. In active partnership with the Center’s steering committee and staff, Urs Gasser led the creation of a long-term strategic plan focused on our core functioning and response to the financial crisis. John Palfrey remains deeply involved as a faculty co-director and principal investigator, bringing us closer to the HLS library and to the rest of the University through his service on the Provost’s Committee on Social Science and other activities spanning Harvard. -
We the Media
We the Media Grassroots Journalism by the People, for the People by Dan Gillmor Copyright © 2004 Dan Gillmor. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Published by O'Reilly Media, Inc., 1005 Gravenstein Highway North, Sebastopol, CA 95472. O'Reilly Media books may be purchased for educational, business, or sales promotional use. Online editions are also available for most titles (safari.oreilly.com). For more information, contact our corporate/institutional sales department: (800) 998-9938 or [email protected]. Editor: Allen Noren Production Editor: Mary Brady Cover Designer: Emma Colby Interior Designer: Melanie Wang Printing History: July 2004: First Edition. The O'Reilly logo is a registered trademark of O'Reilly Media, Inc. We the Media and related trade dress are trademarks of O'Reilly Media, Inc. Many of the designations used by manufacturers and sellers to distinguish their products are claimed as trademarks. Where those designations appear in this book, and O'Reilly Media, Inc. was aware of a trademark claim, the designations have been printed in caps or initial caps. While every precaution has been taken in the preparation of this book, the publisher and author assume no responsibility for errors or omissions, or for damages resulting from the use of the information contained herein. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc- sa/2.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, California 94305, USA. ISBN: 0-596-00733-7 [C] Contents Introduction ix 1. -
Fact-Checking Journalism and the New Ecology of News
Deciding What’s True: Fact-Checking Journalism and the New Ecology of News Lucas Graves Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2013 © 2012 Lucas Graves All rights reserved ABSTRACT Deciding What’s True: Fact-Checking Journalism and the New Ecology of News Lucas Graves This dissertation studies the new class of political fact-checkers, journalists who specialize in assessing the truth of public claims — and who, it is argued, constitute a professional reform movement reaching to the center of the elite US news media. In less than a decade this emergent genre of news has become a basic feature of political coverage. It figures prominently in national debates and commands the direct attention of elite political actors, who respond publicly to the fact-checkers and dedicate staff to dealing with them, especially during electoral campaigns. This study locates fact-checking in a wider practice of “annotative journalism,” with precursors in the muckraking tradition in American news, which has come into flower in an online media environment characterized by promiscuous borrowing and annotation. Participant observation and content analysis are used together to examine the day-to-day work of the news organizations leading the fact-checking movement. This approach documents the specific and forceful critique of conventional journalistic practice which the fact-checkers enact in their newswork routines and in their public and private discourse. Fact-checkers are a species of practical epistemologists, who seek to reform and thus to preserve the objectivity norm in American journalism, even as their daily work runs up against the limits of objective factual analysis. -
Utopia for Beginners Welcome to the Post-Technology Era
SogetiLabs White paper UTOPIAFor Beginners Welcome to the post-technology era Authors Menno van Doorn Sander Duivestein Thijs Pepping SOGETILABS WHITE PAPER Utopia for Beginners Welcome to the post-technology era Welcome in the post-technology era 3 Vision I. The new golden age: A short history of the future 9 Carlota Perez - Beyond the technological revolution 10 Vision II. Power shift: Living in a self sovereign heaven 17 Doc Searls - Turning the system around 18 Sandra Matz - The end of advertising 21 Vision III. The industrialization of the higher needs 24 Rafael Calvo - Beyond damage control: IT for wellbeing 25 Nell Watson - The augmentation of the human heart and soul 27 Vision IV. Making Utopia work: The power of a great narrative 31 Luciano Floridi - Controlling the blue and supporting the green 32 Claudia Senik - A recreation of the sensation that you live in a society 34 Vision V. California dreamin’: A wake up call 38 Peter Leyden - The California way forward 39 Andrew Keen - Social change lies ahead: technology is not the answer 42 Where to begin? 45 2 Utopia for Beginners Welcome to the post-technology era As a child we all had dreams. Whether you wanted to become which direction society is going to take. So as well as doing a doctor, start your own business, learn to play the guitar, what they’re already doing in terms of digital change, or become a professional athlete, your dreams ignited what organizations must take into account a new dimension – the came next and made you ‘go for it’. -
Raw Thought Raw Nerve Inside the Mind of Aaron Swartz
RAW THOUGHT RAW NERVE INSIDE THE MIND OF AARON SWARTZ NOT-FOR-PROFIT — THIRD EDITION DISCOVERY PUBLISHER Book Content: Copyright © Aaron Swartz, under BY-NC-SA 4.0 license as stated by Dr Sean B. Palmer. First Edition: 2014, Discovery Publisher Second Edition: July 2016, Discovery Publisher Third Edition: October 2016, Discovery Publisher Author : Aaron Swartz Editor in Chief: Adriano Lucca Discovery Publisher 616 Corporate Way, Suite 2-4933 Valley Cottage, New York, 10989 www.discoverypublisher.com [email protected] facebook.com/DiscoveryPublisher twitter.com/DiscoveryPB New York • Tokyo • Paris • Hong Kong ABOUT THIS EDITION In October 2014, Discovery Publisher released Raw Thought, Raw Nerve: Inside the Mind of Aaron Swartz. It was then the first publication introducing Aaron Swartz’s lifetime work —see Page 3 for details. In August 2015, the publishing company The New Press, claiming to have legally obtained exclusive copyright from Aaron’s legal IP owner —Dr. Sean B. Palmer— took unlawful steps to shutdown our publication; shortly thereafter, The New Press published a scaled-down version of Raw Thought, Raw Nerve. A similar action was performed shorlty after the release of our second edition. In an article titled “If I get hit by a truck...”, Aaron stated “If I get hit by a truck [...] the contents of all my hard drives [should] be made publicly available”. It should be noted that in all articles published by Aaron on his blog, he never claimed to be against commercial publishing. Aaron was, however, against abusive or restrictive copyright. As such, when the first edition of this book was released, we did not claim exclusive copyright. -
The Future of the Internet Experts and Stakeholders Say the Internet Will Enhance Our Intelligence – Not Make Us Stupid
The Future of the Internet Experts and stakeholders say the Internet will enhance our intelligence – not make us stupid. It will also change the functions of reading and writing and be built around still‐unanticipated gadgetry and applications. The battle over control of the Internet will rage on and debates about online anonymity will persist. Janna Quitney Anderson, Elon University Lee Rainie, Pew Internet & American Life Project February 19, 2010 Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project An initiative of the Pew Research Center 1615 L St., NW – Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20036 202‐419‐4500 | pewinternet.org This publication is part of a Pew Research Center series that captures people’s expectations for the future of the Internet, in the process presenting a snapshot of current attitudes. Find out more at: http://www.pewInternet.org/topics/Future‐of‐the‐Internet.aspx and http://www.imaginingtheinternet.org. 1 Overview In an online survey of 895 technology stakeholders’ and critics’ expectations of social, political and economic change by 2020, fielded by the Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project and Elon University’s Imagining the Internet Center: . Google won’t make us stupid: 76% of these experts agreed with the statement, “By 2020, people’s use of the Internet has enhanced human intelligence; as people are allowed unprecedented access to more information they become smarter and make better choices. Nicholas Carr was wrong: Google does not make us stupid.” Some of the best answers are in Part 1 of this report. Reading, writing, and the rendering of knowledge will be improved: 65% agreed with the statement “by 2020 it will be clear that the Internet has enhanced and improved reading, writing and the rendering of knowledge.” Still, 32% of the respondents expressed concerns that by 2020 “it will be clear that the Internet has diminished and endangered reading, writing and the rendering of knowledge.” Some of the best answers are in Part 2 of this report.