DOCSLIB.ORG

593 593 1151

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
593 593 1151 INDEX A Abandonment pressure, 1020 Alabama, Fayette County, 870, 871 Aberdeen, 223 Fayette gas field, 870 Aberdeen area, 231 Hartselle formation in, 856, 872 Abilene anticline, 461, 471 Huntsville gas field, 872 Accumulation at Billy Creek field, 301 Knox dolomite in, 858 at Hiawatha and West Hiawatha, 357 Madison County, 872, 874 conditions controlling, in Colorado, production in Fayette gas field, 856 New Mexico, and Utah, 370 Alamitos Heights, 186 factors in, in Upper Pennsylvanian in Alamitos zone at Long Beach field, 185 Bend Arch district, 639 Albert series, 106 gas, and marine conditions in Mesozoic Alberta, analyses of gases in, 28 rocks, relation between, 19 Barnwell, or Chin Coulee, field, gas, within continental deposits, 19 richest in helium in, 1060 in eastern Kansas, 491 formations in, 10 of gas at Rattlesnake Hills, 228 gas horizons in, 10 of gas in lenticular sands in Foremost helium in, 1059 field, 33 helium in Belly River group in, 1060 of gas in Lost Soldier district, 320 helium in Bow Island field, 1059 of gas in New Mexico fields, 379 helium in Foremost field, 1060 of gas in southern Oklahoma fields, helium in Upper Cretaceous in, 1060 593 history of natural gas in, 2 of natural gas at Baxter Basin gas location of gas fields, 3 fields, factors controlling, 339 map showing gas-bearing marine rocks of oil and gas, anticlinal hypothesis of, of Colorado formation, 23 593 map showing gas-bearing marine of oil and gas in an anticline, 596 rocks of Lower Montana, 25 of oil-free natural gas, 591 map showing gas-bearing rocks in on homoclines in Idaho fields, 235 Upper Montana, 26 Accumulation and origin of gas of map showing gas fields, 4 Eastern Interior Coal-Basin prov­ Medicine Hat field, 28 ince, 835 natural gas in, 1 of gas of southern Oklahoma, dates nitrogen in Belly River group in, 1060 of, 596 nitrogen in Foremost field, 1060 of oil and gas in Amarillo district, 397 nitrogen in Turner Valley, 1060 Ace area, Texas, 727 nitrogen in Upper Cretaceous in, 1060 Cockfield formation at, 727 Paleozoic formations, Southern Plains, Ackers, A. L., DeChicchis, R., and 14 Smith, R. H., cited, 451, 452, 454 Paleozoic stratigraphy of, 11 Adams, H. H., 634 pipe lines in, 3 Addison, Carl B., cited, 9 stratigraphic column in, 11 Adirondack Mountains, 950 structural provinces in, 6 Adkins, W. S., cited, 653, 654, 655 Alberta gas fields, data on, 5 Adkins, W. S., Sellards, E. H., and reserves in, 18 Plummer, F. B., cited, 653 Alberta geosyncline, 7 Africa, natural gas in, 1091 Alberta homocline, 9 Alabama, Cambro-Ordovician magne- potential gas reserves, 18 sian limestones in, 858 Alberta natural gas, composition of, 27 1 Items referring to titles of papers are shown in italics. 1151 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/books/book/chapter-pdf/3840786/9781629812557_backmatter.pdf by guest on 02 October 2021 11 5 2 INDEX Alden, R. C., cited, 1122, 1123 American Rolling Mills Company, 916, Alden field, 952 943. Allan, John A., and Rutherford, Ralph Amity anticline, 993 L., cited, 12 Ammonia, 1118 Allegheny group in Ohio, 901 Ammonium sulphate, 1118 Alma anticline, 562 Amory field, Mississippi, 857, 873 Alma field, Atoka sandstone in, 563 development, 877 pressure at, 563 drill record of Rye well No. 1 in, 875 recoveries from, 564 stratigraphy of, 873 reserves of, 564 unconformity above Paleozoic at, 876 Alma-Smelter field, 562 wells in, 87s Alma, Williams, and Kibler fields, Anadarko basin, 397, 459 recoveries from, 566 Anaheim dome at East Coyote field, 207 Alsace, nitrogen at Pechelbronn, 1060 Analyses, 29 Altamira field, Cretaceous in, 999 of Arkansas gas, 558 Amalgamated Oil Company, 207 of Bend Arch gases, 645 Amarillo, Texas, helium plant near, 1064 of Black shale from wells in eastern Amarillo arch, 392, 399 Kentucky, 939 Amarillo district, drilling methods in, of gas at Big Lake field, 446 411 of gas at Whitlash dome, 275 faulting contemporaneous with depo­ of gas, Baxter Basin gas fields, 337 sition in, 393 of gas, Bowdoin field, 262 faulting in, 394 of gas from Gulf Coast salt-dome area, folding in, 394 738, 739 folding contemporaneous with deposi­ of gas from Hiawatha and West tion in, 393 Hiawatha gas fields, 360 geologic formations, 390 of gas from Hobbs field, 430, 432 geology and occurrence of natural gas in, of gas from Jackson field, 893 385 of gas from Kansas fields, 480 Granite wash in, 390 of gas from Lima-Indiana district, 851 magnetometer surveys in, 395 of gas from wells on East Lea County migration of oil and gas in, 397 “ high,” 429 occurrence of gas in, 390 of gas in Idaho, 237 oil in, 397 of gases, Big Horn Basin gas fields, 293 origin and accumulation of oil and gas of gases from Baxter Basin gas . in>.397 fields, 337 oscillating shore-line conditions in, 393 of gases from Great Salt Lake wells, Pennsylvanian in, 390, 392 241 Pennsylvanian source beds in, 399 of gases in Alberta, 28 Permian in, 390 of gases in Northern fields in Mexico, Permian dolomite in, 386 1000 pipe lines from, 390 of gases of Lake Chapala, 1003 porosity in, 404 of gases of Southern fields of Mexico, pre-Pennsylvanian source beds in, 398 1003 producing horizons of, 391 of gases of Tlahuac, 1003 recoveries from, 404 of high carbon dioxide gases from reserves in, 404 wells in United States, 1068 reservoir rocks of, 395 of natural gas from Illinois and structure in, 387, 393 Kentucky, 838 structure sections, 388 of natural gas in Michigan, 809 unconformities in, 390, 401 of natural gases from metal mines, Amarillo helium plant, 1054 mineral springs, and fumaroles, Amarillo Mountains, buried, 393 1063 Amatldn field, Cretaceous in, 999 of Ontario gas, 85 Amerada Walton well, 453 of rich helium and nitrogen natural American Association of Petroleum gases from wells in United States Geologists, Bulletin of The, 418 and Canada, 1062 American Fuel Oil Company, 1002 of water in Bend Arch district, 647 American Michigan Pipeline Company, Analysis, gas, 27 811 of Billy Creek gas, 303 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/books/book/chapter-pdf/3840786/9781629812557_backmatter.pdf by guest on 02 October 2021 INDEX 1 1 S3 Analysis, of Black shale in eastern Appalachian basin, 71 Kentucky, 938 Appalachian gas field, 989 of gas at Bowes field, 264 Appalachian geosyncline, 105, 916, 950, of gas at Mahoney gas field, 315 952, 965, 99° of gas at Stony Creek field, 107 Appalachian orogeny, 99 of gas at Turner Valley field, 46 Appalachian Plateau district, 915 of gas from Amerada Walton well, 453 Appalachian revolution, 105 of gas from Andrews County, 455 Applin, Esther Richards, Ellisor, Alva of gas from Bay St. Elaine, 711 C., and Kniker, Hedwig T., of gas from Big Lake field, 443 cited, 689 of gas from “ Brown lime,” Bowers Archer to McCulloch County, Bend sand, and “ Big gas” zones, Arch district, log section from, Hobbs field, 432 619 of gas from Church-McElroy field, 456 Ardmore basin, 588 of gas from Cutbank field, 269 Argus Gas Company, 413 of gas from Kevin-Sunburst field, 270 Arkadelphia in Monroe field, 750 of gas from Maljamar, Vandergriff, Arkansas, Atoka formation in Interior and Artesia fields, 437 Highlands of, 544 of gas from Sayre field, 415 Batesville sandstone in Interior High­ of gas from Ward County wells, 454 lands of, 542 of gas from wells in Colorado, 375 Bloyd shale in Interior Highlands of, of gas from wells in New Mexico, 375 544 of gas from wells in Utah, 375 Boone formation in Interior High­ of gas from Wertz gas field, 312, 313 lands of, 542 of gas from Winkler field, 453 carbon ratio of coals in northwest, 557 of gas from Yates field, 450 carbon ratios of Interior Highland of gas, Turner Valley field, 51 province of, 555 of Panhandle gas, 409 Carroll County, 539 Anderson, C. C., 1054, 1057, 1059 Chattanooga shale in Interior High­ Anderson, Robert, and Arnold, Ralph, lands of, 542 154 Crawford County, 550, 562, 564, 565, Andrews, T. H., cited, 275, 276 573 Andrews County, Texas, 455 Faulkner County, 546 analysis of gas from, 455 Fayetteville formation in Interior Anhydrite zone of Glen Rose at Richland Highlands of, 542 field, 780 Franklin County, 550, 573 Anson pool, 467, 477 gas fields of central western, in rela­ Howard limestone at, 477 tion to structural trends, 550 Anticlinal crests, thickening of incom­ Hindsville limestone in Interior High­ petent members over, 588 lands of, 542 Anticlinal fields, 1081 Johnson County, 550, 573 Anticlinal hypothesis of oil and gas Logan County, 550 accumulation, 593 Mansfield field, 568 Anticlinal spur from Puente Hills at Middle Carboniferous sedimentary Richfield area, 214 rocks of Interior Highlands of, Anticlinal structure, production asso­ 54i ciated with, 236 Moorefield shale in Interior High­ Anticline, 98 lands of, 542 asymmetrical, 106 natural gas in interior highlands of, 533 in Tilbury field, 74 Ordovician, Silurian, Devonian, and Anticlines, Cretaceous, 253 early Carboniferous sedimentary faulted, Big Horn gas fields located rocks of Interior Highlands in, on, 282 54° in Gaspe Peninsula, 104 Perry County, 544 in northern Mid-Continent region, Pope County, 550, 559, 573 thinning over, 588 Scott County, 568 Anticlines and faults in Arkansas Sebastian County, 550, 566, 568, 573 Valley province, Oklahoma, 513 structure sections across Interior Anticosti, 104 _ Highlands of, 553 Antrim shale in Missaukee County, 808 Union County, 779 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/books/book/chapter-pdf/3840786/9781629812557_backmatter.pdf by guest on 02 October 2021 1154 INDEX Arkansas, Wedington sandstone in Artemus anticline, 932 Interior Highlands of, 543 Artemus-Himyar field, 945 western, and Oklahoma, eastern, Devonian in, 945 gas fields in, 536 faulting in, 946 Yell County, 544, 550 Onondaga limestone in, 945 Arkansas basin, faulting contempora­ Artesia field, 436, 437, neous with deposition in, 516 Artesia, Maljamar, and Vandergriff faulting in, 514, 516 fields, analysis of gas from, 437 folding in, 514 Ashland field, 519, 932, 943 Hartshorne sandstone in, 517 Brown shale in, 943 of eastern Oklahoma, natural gas in, 511 Hartshorne sandstone at, 519 of Oklahoma, 512 Ashley Creek, Utah, 369 structure, 514 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter Upper Cretaceous Reservoirs
    CHAPTER 9 UPPER CRETACEOUS RESERVOIRS P. Viney, Petrel Robertson; Part B: Belly River Fm; and J.F. Chappell, L.L. & E. Canada; Part A: Cardium Fm INTRODUCTION The Bearpaw Fm, over 150 m thick in southcentral Alberta it would appear that exploration dollars directed towards them could Walker (1987, 1988), Swagor (1975) and Swagor et al. (1976). (14-18-2-23W4M), thins to the north and grades into the non-marine yield a good rate of return. Interest in exploration for these Cardium Fm conglomerate reser­ The evolution of the Alberta Basin during Upper Cretaceous time sequence of the overlying Horseshoe Canyon Fm (Edmonton Gp). voirs was reactivated in the early 1980's due to the discovery of and its effect on the geologic section is covered in the introduction to The four major Upper Cretaceous reservoirs are: 1) The Cardium; several new Cardium Fm pools and the recognition that modern this text. Strata of the Upper Cretaceous underlie most of the area Production has been obtained from the Upper Cretaceous section 2) The lower Belly River; 3) The Dunvegan-Doe Creek; and 4) The seismic reflection technology could be used in their detection covered by the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin in an almost con­ for many years. However, prospecting for Upper Cretaceous hydro­ Belly River fluvial. (Chappell, 1984, 1985; Wren, 1984). The Carrot Creek Cardium S tinuous sequence of deposition. From the Base of Fish Scales Zone, carbons did not begin in earnest until the discovery of Cardium pool, located in 53-12 and 13 W5M (Fig. 9.4), is a typical example.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGY and OIL and GAS PROSPECTS of the HUNTLEY FIELD, Montanj
    GEOLOGY AND OIL AND GAS PROSPECTS OF THE HUNTLEY FIELD, MONTANj By E. T. HANCOCK. INTRODUCTION. The Huntley field is in Yellowstone and Big Horn counties, south- central Montana, and embraces an area of about 650 square miles, part of which lies northwest and part southeast of Yellowstone River. The field has railroad facilities that are exceptionally good for this general region, being traversed by the main lines of the Northern Pacific and the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy railroads. These roads furnish excellent shipping facilities at Huntley, Warden, Ballantine, Pompeys Pillar, and other points. Acknowledgments. In presenting this report the writer desires to express his thanks to David White for valuable suggestions and criticisms, to T. W. Stanton and F. H. Knowlton for the identifica­ tion of fossils, and to C. E. Dobbins for assistance in the detailed mapping. He also wishes to call attention to the public service rendered by oil and gas operators who have furnished records of deep borings and by individuals who have contributed in various ways to the success of the investigation. Earlier investigations. The Huntley field is in reality an ex­ tension of the Lake Basin field, which was mapped by the writer during the summer of 1916.1 The geologic investigation of the region including the Lake Basin and Huntley fields began with the Northern Transcontinental Survey of 1882. Prior to that time geologists had described certain struc­ tural features and the stratigraphic succession at points closely ad­ jacent to these fields, such as Judith Gap, the canyon of the North Fork of the- Musselshell, and the Bridger Range, but almost noth­ ing had been written concerning the geology of the area herein de­ scribed.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoindian Land Use in Glacier National Park
    PALEOINDIAN LAND USE IN GLACIER NATIONAL PARK John J. Kinsner, M.A. Final Report 2010 Author’s Acknowledgements This project was made possible by funding provided from the National Park Service’s Rocky Mountain Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (RM-CESU). The author would like to extend special thanks to Christine Whitacre and Pei-Lin Yu of the RM-CESU, Lon Johnson and Deirdre Shaw of Glacier National Park, and Dr. Douglas H. MacDonald of the University of Montana. John J. Kinsner OUTLINE 1. Title Page w/ photo 4 (Mount Carter) 2. Acknowledgements 2. Report Outline 3. Introduction 3. Cultural Chronology 3. Table 1 5. Paleoindian Evidence in Glacier Park 6. Original Interpretations w/ photo 1 (Alberta projectile point) 7. Other Evidence 9. Seasonality 9. Physical Evidence 11. Depositional Environment 12. Three Hypotheses 15. Discussion 16. Conclusion 18. Figure 1 19. Photos 2 – 3 20. Photos 4 - 5 21. Bibliography 2 It has generally been understood that Glacier National Park (GNP) has a 10,000 year culture history as implied by the archeological record of GNP, park brochures, numerous publications (Reeves 2003), and governmental, corporate, and private web sites (nps.gov, Wikipedia.com, fcvb.org). However, this presumption is based upon a very weak record of Paleoindian occupation within park boundaries represented by two isolated, surface discoveries, and three typologically non-diagnostic, non-stratified basalt knives. Of the three represented ‘sites’, only one potentially represents Alpine land use within GNP and may or may not be related to Paleoindian activities. This paper examines this lone Paleoindian alpine site in order to extract a logical explanation of its deposition and to offer up possible evidence of early human occupation in one of the more remote and inaccessible regions of GNP.
    [Show full text]
  • Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana
    Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 348 Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana By W. H. EASTON GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 348 A study of the stratigraphic and ecologic associa­ tions and significance offossils from the Big Snowy group of Mississippian and Pennsylvanian rocks UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1962 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library has cataloged this publication as follows : Eastern, William Heyden, 1916- Carboniferous formations and faunas of central Montana. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1961. iv, 126 p. illus., diagrs., tables. 29 cm. (U.S. Geological Survey. Professional paper 348) Part of illustrative matter folded in pocket. Bibliography: p. 101-108. 1. Paleontology Montana. 2. Paleontology Carboniferous. 3. Geology, Stratigraphic Carboniferous. I. Title. (Series) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, B.C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract-__________________________________________ 1 Faunal analysis Continued Introduction _______________________________________ 1 Faunal relations ______________________________ 22 Purposes of the study_ __________________________ 1 Long-ranging elements...__________________ 22 Organization of present work___ __________________ 3 Elements of Mississippian affinity.._________ 22 Acknowledgments--.-------.- ___________________
    [Show full text]
  • FORT BELKNAP RESERVATION List of Topics
    FORT BELKNAP RESERVATION List of Topics BACKGROUND Reservation Overview Regional Geologic Overview GEOLOGIC OVERVIEW Geologic History Summary of Play Types CONVENTIONAL PLAY TYPES Play 1 - Shallow Cretaceous Biogenic Gas Play Play 2 - Northern Plains Biogenic Gas Play Plays 3,4,5 - Jurassic/Cretaceous and Mississippian Plays UNCONVENTIONAL / HYPOTHETICAL PLAY TYPES Plays 6,7 - Fractured Bakken and Cambrian Sandstone Plays REFERENCES Historical Background of the OVERVIEW (i.e. joint ventures) in contrast to procedures and regulatory minimums imposed Assiniboine and Gros Ventre Tribes at Fort Belknap by the previous 1938 Minerals Leasing Act. The 1982 Act further provides that FORT BELKNAP RESERVATION The Fort Belknap Indian Reservation was created in 1887 as the home for the individual Indian allottees may join agreements negotiated for tribal lands. The Assiniboine and Gros Ventre Tribes Assiniboine and Gros Ventre Indian Tribes. The ancestors of these tribes have section entitled Operating Regulations discusses the procedures for obtaining lived on the northern plains for several centuries. The Assiniboine were allottee participance in the negotiated agreement. recognized by Europeans as part of the great Sioux Nation and speak a Siouan Principal components for the formal corporate proposal should include the TRIBAL HEADQUARTERS: Fort Belknap Agency, Montana language. However, their name is taken from a Chippewa word referring to area(s) of interest, type of contract, elaboration of proposed agreement terms, GEOLOGIC SETTING: Williston Basin "those who cook with stones." At some point in time the Assiniboine bands points of potential negotiation, diligence commitments (i.e. drilling), bonus broke with the traditional Sioux and allied themselves with the Cree.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Cross Section C–C' Through the Appalachian Basin from Erie
    Geologic Cross Section C–C’ Through the Appalachian Basin From Erie County, North-Central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge Province, Bedford County, South-Central Pennsylvania By Robert T. Ryder, Michael H. Trippi, Christopher S. Swezey, Robert D. Crangle, Jr., Rebecca S. Hope, Elisabeth L. Rowan, and Erika E. Lentz Scientific Investigations Map 3172 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Ryder, R.T., Trippi, M.H., Swezey, C.S. Crangle, R.D., Jr., Hope, R.S., Rowan, E.L., and Lentz, E.E., 2012, Geologic cross section C–C’ through the Appalachian basin from Erie County, north-central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge province, Bedford County, south-central Pennsylvania: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3172, 2 sheets, 70-p.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in The
    Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Medina County, Ohio, through Southwestern and South-Central Pennsylvania to Hampshire County, West Virginia U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839-K Chapter K Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Medina County, Ohio, through Southwestern and South-Central Pennsylvania to Hampshire County, West Virginia By ROBERT T. RYDER, ANITA G. HARRIS, and JOHN E. REPETSKI Stratigraphic framework of the Cambrian and Ordovician sequence in part of the central Appalachian basin and the structure of underlying block-faulted basement rocks U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839 EVOLUTION OF SEDIMENTARY BASINS-APPALACHIAN BASIN U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, Jr., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1992 For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Ryder, Robert T. Stratigraphic framework of Cambrian and Ordovician rocks in the central Appalachian Basin from Medina County, Ohio, through southwestern and south-central Pennsylvania to Hampshire County, West Virginia / by Robert T. Ryder, Anita C. Harris, and John E. Repetski. p. cm. (Evolution of sedimentary basins Appalachian Basin ; ch. K) (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1839-K) Includes bibliographical references. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.3:1839-K 1. Geology, Stratigraphic Cambrian.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Information Maxville Lime.Stone
    .·-~ . f GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF OHIO WILBER STOUT, State Geologist Fourth Series Information Circular No. 3 RECENT INFORMATION ON THE MAXVILLE LIME.STONE by RAYMONDE. LAMBORN COLUMBUS 1945 Reprinted 1961 HOOK I\(..• OHIO GEOL. SURVEY. LAKE ERIE SECTION LIBRARY CARD NO. ·7 STATE CF OHIO Michael V. DiSalle Governor DEPARTMENT CF NATURAL RESOURCES Herbert B. Eagon Director NATURAL RESOURCES CCMMISSION C. D. Blubaugh Joseph E. Hunt Herbert B. Eagon Roy M. Kottman Byron Frederick DemClB L. Sean Forrest G. Hl1ll Myron T. Sturgeon Willian• Hoyne DIVISION OF GEQ.OGICAL SURVEY Ralph j. Bernhagen Chief COLUMBUS 1945 Reprinted 1961 Heer ptg. Co., Cols., O. INTRODUCTION The Maxville has been an important source of limestone for more than 100 years in southern and east central Ohio where it was first utilized for mortar and for furnace flux. Probably for this rea~on outcrops of a limestone later shown to be Maxville in age were described by Briggs in 1838 who noted occurrences near Maxville, Perry County; on Three Mile Run near Logan in Hocking County; near Reeds Mills near Wellston, Jackson County; and at the Canter Quarry in Hamilton Township, Jack- son County.1 Further obser.vations of this limestone were made by E. B. Andrews of the Second Geological Survey of Ohio and his report was published in the Report of Progress in 1869. Andrews named the lime- stone the Maxville for its occurrence near Maxville, Hocking County, noted its patchy distribution on the outcrop, described its stratigraphic position as immediately overlying the Logan sandstones ana shales, and declared the limestone to be of sub-Carboniferous (Mississippian) age.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Fundamental Difference Between Coal Rank and Coal Type
    International Journal of Coal Geology 118 (2013) 58–87 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Coal Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijcoalgeo Review article On the fundamental difference between coal rank and coal type Jennifer M.K. O'Keefe a,⁎, Achim Bechtel b,KimonChristanisc, Shifeng Dai d, William A. DiMichele e, Cortland F. Eble f,JoanS.Esterleg, Maria Mastalerz h,AnneL.Raymondi, Bruno V. Valentim j,NicolaJ.Wagnerk, Colin R. Ward l, James C. Hower m a Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Morehead State University, Morehead, KY 40351, USA b Department of Applied Geosciences and Geophysics, Montan Universität, Leoben, Austria c Department of Geology, University of Patras, 265.04 Rio-Patras, Greece d State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China e Department of Paleobiology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA f Kentucky Geological Survey, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA g School of Earth Sciences, The University of Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia h Indiana Geological Survey, Indiana University, 611 North Walnut Grove, Bloomington, IN 47405-2208, USA i Department of Geology and Geophysics, College Station, TX 77843, USA j Department of Geosciences, Environment and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto and Geology Centre of the University of Porto, Rua Campo Alegre 687, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal k School Chemical & Metallurgical Engineering, University of Witwatersrand, 2050, WITS, South Africa l School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia m University of Kentucky, Center for Applied Energy Research, 2540 Research Park Drive, Lexington, KY 40511, USA article info abstract Article history: This article addresses the fundamental difference between coal rank and coal type.
    [Show full text]
  • A Geologic Excursion to Fluorspar Mines in Hardin and Pope Counties, Illinois
    Prepared for the Ninth Annual Forum on the Geology of Industrial Minerals Paducoh, Kentucky, April 27-28, 1973 A GEOLOGIC EXCURSION TO FLUORSPAR MINES IN HARDIN AND POPE COUNTIES, ILLINOIS Illinois-Kentucky Mining District and Adjacent Upper Mississippi Embayment James W. Baxter James C. Bradbury Norman C. Hester Contributions on Mine Geology D. B. Saxby B. L. Perry Illinois State Geologicol Survey Guidebook Series II A WONDERFUL AND VALUABLE FLUX. OXMXO- " FLUOR SPAR." Mined and Especially Manufactured by -^THE PEIUL MINING GOMPANY,^- ROSE CLARE, HARDIN COUNTY, ILLINOIS, For the immediate use of all Metal Workers , comprising Smelting and Refining Works, Brass and Copper Works, Car Wheel Works, Sewing Machine Works, Stove Works, Glass and Chemical Works, Agricultural Works, OR WHEREVER METAL OF ANY KIND IS SMELTED OR CASTINGS MADE. iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii Gentlemen : —Your close attention is earnestly invited to this new and powerful flux, endorsed by all chemists as the most searching and most favorable mineral ever discovered for the reduction and purification of metals. Our mines produce it in its purest state and without adulteration, and as it is only manufactured so as to be in the best condition for your use, we respectfully ask you to give it a trial. Kluor Spar, when exposed to heat, sends forth fumes of the most powerful fluxing, searching, purifying kind known to science, and these fumes, coming into contact with the silicates and impurities in metals, drives them out. Phosphorus and sulphur, that bllfjbear to all metals, is volatilized at once and passes off, leaving a clean, clear residue which flows without hindrance or obstruction until the last ounce of metal contained in the charge is withdrawn.
    [Show full text]
  • B-127 Lithostratigraphic Framework Of
    &A 'NlOO,G-3 &i flo, 12 7 g l F£i&f THE LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK OF \;\ .-t "- THE UPPERMOST CRETACEOUS AND LOWER TERTIARY OF EASTERN BURKE COUNTY, GEORGIA Paul F. Huddlestun and Joseph H. Summerour Work Performed in Cooperation with United States Geological Survey (Cooperative Agreement Number 1434-92-A-0959) and U. S. Department of Energy (Cooperative Agreement Number DE-FG-09-92SR12868) GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION GEORGIA GEOLOGIC SURVEY Atlanta 1996 Bulletin 127 THE LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK OF THE UPPERMOST CRETACEOUS AND LOWER TERTIARY OF EASTERN BURKE COUNTY, GEORGIA Paul F. Huddlestun and Joseph H. Summerour GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Lonice C. Barrett, Commissioner ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION Harold F. Reheis, Director GEORGIA GEOLOGIC SURVEY William H. McLemore, State Geologist Atlanta 1996 Bulletin 127 ABSTRACT One new formation, two new members, and a redefinition of an established lithostratigraphic unit are formally introduced here. The Oconee Group is formally recognized in the Savannah River area and four South Carolina Formations not previously used in Georgia by the Georgia Geologic Survey are recognized in eastern Burke County. The Still Branch Sand is a new formation and the two new members are the Bennock Millpond Sand Member of the Still Branch Sand and the Blue Bluff Member of the Lisbon Formation. The four South Carolina formations recognized in eastern Burke CountY include the Steel Creek Formation and Snapp Formation of the Oconee Group, the Black Mingo Formation (undifferentiated), and the Congaree Formation. The Congaree Formation and Still Branch Sand are considered to be lithostratigraphic components of the Claiborne Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of Ohio Geology 1966
    STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SU RVEY Horace R. Collins, Chief Information Circular No. 37 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF OHIO GEOLOGY 1966 . 1970 compiled by Pauline Smyth Columbus 1972 SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL STAFF OF THE OHIO DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ADMINISTRATIVE SECTION Horace R. Collins, MS, State Geologist and Division Chief David K. Webb, Jr., PhD, Geologist and Assistant Chief Jean Simmons Brown, MS, Geologist and Editor William J. Buschman, Jr., BS, Administrative Geologist Michael C. Hansen, BS, Geologist Karen M. Harper, BS, Geologist Pauline Smyth, MS, Geologist Eleanor J. Hyle, Secretary W. Alfredia Moore, Clerk-Typist REGION AL GEOLOGY SECTION Richard A. Struble, PhD, Geologist and Section Head Richard W. Carlton, PhD, Geologist Michael L. Couchot, MS, Geologist Richard M. DeLong, MS, Geologist David S. Fullerton, PhD, Geologist Gerald H. Groenewold, PhD, Geologist Norman F. Knapp, MS, Chemist Arthur H. Morth, PhD, Chemical Engineer Donald L. Streib, PhD, Geochemist David A. Stith, MS, Geologist Joel D. Vormelker, MS, Geologist Frederick L. Rice, Laboratory Technician SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY SECTION Adriaan Janssens, PhD, Geologist and Section Head Michael J. Clifford, BS, Geologist Jeffrey B. Hermann, BS, Geologist Barbara J. Adams, Clerk-Typist B. Margalene Crammer, Clerk James Wooten, Geologist Aide LAKE ERIE SECTION David K. Webb, Jr., PhD, Geologist and Acting Section Head Lawrence L. Braidech, BS, Geologist Charles H. Carter, PhD, Geologist Walter R. Lemke, Boat Captain Dale L. Liebenthal, Geologist Aide Lynn M. Gerold, Clerk-Typist PUBLIC A TIO NS SECTION Harold J. Flint, Cartographer and Section Head James A. Brown, Cartographer Donald R. Camburn, Cartographer Philip J.
    [Show full text]