DOCSLIB.ORG

Statistical Summaries of Streamflow in Montana and Adjacent Areas, Water Years 1900 Through 2002

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Statistical Summaries of Streamflow in Montana and Adjacent Areas, Water Years 1900 Through 2002 Statistical Summaries of Streamflow in Montana and Adjacent Areas, Water Years 1900 through 2002 By Peter M. McCarthy Abstract economical design of highway bridges, culverts, dams, levees, and other structures on or near streams. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has previously pub- In response to the need to have more current information lished reports that describe and document streamflow character- about streamflow characteristics in Montana, the U.S. Geologi- istics at streamflow-gaging stations in Montana (Shields and cal Survey, in cooperation with the Montana Department of White, 1981; Waltemeyer and Shields, 1982; and Omang, Environmental Quality, Confederated Salish and Kootenai 1984). Two of these reports were based on data through 1979, Tribes, and Bureau of Land Management, conducted a study to and one used data through 1982. Since the completion of these analyze streamflow data. Updated statistical summaries of reports, nearly 20 years of additional data have become avail- streamflow characteristics are presented for 286 streamflow- able, and many new gages have been installed which now have gaging sites in Montana and adjacent areas having 10 or more 10 or more years of streamflow records. In response to the need years of record for water years 1900 through 2002. Data to have more current information about streamflow characteris- include the magnitude and probability of annual low and high tics in Montana, the USGS, in cooperation with the Montana flow, the magnitude and probability of low flow for three sea - Department of Environmental Quality, Confederated Salish and sons (March-June, July-October, and November-February), Kootenai Tribes, and Bureau of Land Management, conducted flow duration of the daily mean discharge, and the monthly and a study to analyze streamflow data from 286 sites having at least annual mean discharges. For streamflow-gaging stations where 10 years of streamflow record. 20 percent or more of the contributing drainage basin is affected by dams or other large-scale human modification, streamflow is considered regulated. Separate streamflow characteristics are Purpose and Scope presented for the unregulated and regulated periods of record for sites with sufficient data. The purpose of this report is to provide statistical summa- ries of streamflow characteristics at selected sites in Montana and adjacent areas for water years 1900 through 2002. Data Introduction include the magnitude and probability of annual low and high flow, the magnitude and probability of low flow for three sea- sons (March-June, July-October, and November-February), Information about streamflow characteristics is essential flow duration of the daily mean discharge, and the monthly and for development and management of surface-water resources. annual mean discharges. For streamflow-gaging stations where Water and land-use managers, planners, administrators, 20 percent or more of the contributing drainage basin is affected builders, engineers, recreationists, and the general public use by dams or other large-scale human modification, streamflow is information on all aspects of streamflow to evaluate various considered regulated. Separate streamflow-characteristics data water conditions and land-use alternatives. are presented for the unregulated and regulated periods of Annual low-flow and seasonal streamflow characteristics record for sites with sufficient data. and annual high-flow streamflow characteristics are particu- larly important for characterizing streamflow variability. Low- flow frequency data for annual and seasonal periods indicate Site Selection how frequently small values of discharge might occur and are used for assessing the capability of streams to receive and The sites selected for analysis are shown in figure 1 and assimilate treated wastewater, developing wastewater permits, described in table 1. A total of 286 streamflow-gaging stations determining total maximum daily loads of streams, and assess- were selected—269 of these stations are in Montana, 3 are at or ing aquatic habitat. Annual high-flow frequency data, in con- near the international boundary between the United States and junction with flood-frequency data (Parrett and Johnson, 2004), Canada, 2 are in Alberta, 2 are in British Columbia, 1 is in indicate how frequently large values of discharge might occur Idaho, and 9 are in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming. Of and are useful for effective flood planning and for safe and the 286 sites, data for 224 stations were analyzed for periods of 2 Statistical Summaries of Streamflow in Montana and Adjacent Areas, Water Years 1900 through 2002 unregulated flow only, data for 47 stations were analyzed for are developed from annual series of the lowest mean discharges periods of regulated flow only, and data for 15 stations were for each of the spring (March through June), summer (July analyzed for separate periods of unregulated and regulated flow through September), and winter (October through February) (fig. 1). For clarity in table 1 and figure 1, stations were seasons for specified consecutive n-day periods within a cli- assigned site numbers 1 through 286. The period of record by matic year. The periods selected for spring, summer, and winter type of streamflow condition is listed in table 1. Of the 224 sites were based on consultations with the Montana Department of where data were analyzed for periods of unregulated flow only, Environmental Quality (Tom Reid, Montana Department of 8 stations were analyzed for periods before regulation only, and Environmental Quality, oral commun., 2002) and reflect typical the remaining 216 stations were analyzed for the entire period runoff and irrigation patterns in Montana. of record for unregulated flows. The Pearson Type III probability distribution was used to The statistical summaries provided for periods of unregu- estimate annual and seasonal low-flow frequency data (U.S. lated flow might differ from summaries provided for periods of Geological Survey, 2002b). The Pearson Type III distribution regulated flow. Typically these differences are the result of is a three-parameter distribution, commonly applied to the base changes in regulation. However, differences in statistical sum- 10 logarithms of streamflow data, that requires estimates of the maries also might be the result of different climatic conditions logarithms of the population mean, the standard deviation, and rather than difference in regulation. the skew coefficient to determine streamflow magnitude for various non-exceedance or exceedance probabilities. For low- flow frequency, the population values are assumed to be equal to the values computed from the station record, and streamflow Methods of Creating the Statistical magnitudes are determined for non-exceedance probabilities. Summaries The annual low-flow frequency data indicate the lowest mean discharges for consecutive periods of 1, 3, 7, 14, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 183 days and for non-exceedance probabilities of The tables of statistical summaries of streamflow are pre- 50, 20, 10, 5, 2, and 1 percent. The non-exceedance probability ceded by a station description which typically includes station (in decimal form before conversion to percent) associated with location, drainage area, period of record (by water years or by a low flow is the reciprocal of the recurrence interval, in years. month and year), revised records, gage information, and The seasonal low-flow frequency data indicate lowest mean remarks. The period of record included in the station descrip- discharges for consecutive periods of 1, 3, 7, 14, and 30 days for tions might not include all years in which data were recorded at non-exceedance probabilities of 50, 20, 10, 5, 2, and 1 percent. the station, and thus, might not coincide with the period of Each value of discharge in the annual and seasonal low- record used for analysis (table 1). Information about the num- flow tables is a mean low flow within the year or season for a ber of years, seasons, or months used for analysis are included consecutive n-day period that can be expected to be lower, on in the table headings. Remarks include information on the his- average, once in any specified recurrence interval (every y tory of regulating structures, if any, and comments on the other years). Similarly, each value of discharge in the low-flow factors that may affect flow. Remarks are based on information tables has a specified (x-percent) non-exceedance probability available at the time the stations were in operation, and thus, that, in any given year, a smaller value n-day mean low-flow might not represent streamflow conditions in 2002. However, value will occur. For example, the low-flow value for a consec- the latitude and longitude for stations that were discontinued utive 7-day period and the 2-year recurrence interval can be before about 1960 have been updated (2004). expected to be lower, on average, once every 2 years. Similarly, Daily mean streamflow values for each station were a low flow for a consecutive 7-day period and 50-percent non- retrieved using the computer program Automated Data Process- exceedance probability has a 50-percent chance of being lower ing System (ADAPS) (U. S. Geological Survey, 2003) and pro- in any given year. cessed using the computer program Input and Output for Water- For any n-day period, discharges decrease with increasing shed Data Management (IOWDM) (U.S. Geological Survey, recurrence interval and decreasing non-exceedance probability. 2002a). High- and low-flow frequency data, monthly and Conversely, for any given recurrence interval or non-exceed- annual-flow characteristics, and flow-duration data were then ance probability, discharge increases with increasing n-day computed using the computer program Surface-Water Statistics periods. Seasonal and annual low-flow frequency data are only (SWSTAT) (U.S. Geological Survey, 2000b). reported in the tables for recurrence intervals of twice the period of record or less (Parrett, 1997). For example, if the period of Annual and Seasonal Low-Flow Frequencies record is 10 years, only low-flow data for recurrence intervals of 20 years or less were presented.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bighorn Backcountry Brochure 2015
    Alberta’s Bighorn Backcountry offers spectacular Rocky Mountain scenery and unforgettable recreational opportunities. Keep this area beautiful: K stay on the trail, K respect other users, and K leave no trace of your visit. High Level The Bighorn Backcountry is managed to ensure the protection of the environment, while allowing responsible and sustainable recreational use. The area includes more than 5,000 square kilometres (1.2 million acres) of public lands east of Banff and Jasper National Parks. 35 Fort McMurray Peace River 63 The Bighorn Backcountry hosts a large variety of recreational activities Slave Grande 2 including camping, hiking, fishing, hunting and cycling. Prairie Lake Athabasca 40 32 43 It is your responsibility to become familiar with activities allowed in this 44 2 Edson area before you visit. Please refer to the map and chart in this pamphlet 16 Lloydminster EDMONTON 16 Hinton 47 22 Jasper for further details. Visitors who do not follow the rules could be fined or 39 734 2 National Bighorn 22 charged under provincial legislation. Backcountry 21 41 Park 11 Rocky 11 Mountain Red Deer House 54 12 56 If you have any concerns about the condition of the trails and campsites 734 21 Banff 27 9 National 22 Drumheller or their appropriate use, please call Environment and Sustainable Park 72 9 56 1 1 Resource Development at the Rocky Mountain House Office, CALGARY 24 23 403-845-8250. (Dial 310-0000 for toll-free service.) 1 B 2 23 22 Medicine . Hat C Lethbridge For current trail conditions and information kiosk locations, . 3 please visit the Bighorn Backcountry website at www.esrd.alberta.ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Helena Interagency Dispatch Center
    Helena Interagency Dispatch Center Cooperating Agencies: USDA Forest Service- Helena National Forest USDI Bureau of Land Management Montana Dept. of Natural Resources & Conservation- Central Lands Office Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks Lewis and Clark, Broadwater, Jefferson and Meagher Counties Helena, Montana NEWS RELEASE For Release Immediately Contact:: Amy Teegarden Office: (406) 495-3747 Cell Phone: (406) 439-9135 FIRE RESTRICTIONS TO BEGIN THIS WEEK HELENA, MONT., July 17, 2007- Stage 1 fire restrictions will be implemented this Friday, by the Helena National Forest and members of the Helena Fire Restrictions division. “Thunderstorms coupled with record-breaking heat this week is a recipe for wildfires and local officials are instituting fire restrictions in an effort to reduce new fire starts.” stated Amy Teegarden, spokesperson for the Helena National Forest. Restrictions on smoking and open fires on federal and state lands, as well as on private-forested lands in Lewis and Clark County will take effect Friday, July 20 at 0001. Restrictions will be enforced on lands administered by the Helena National Forest, Bureau of Land Management and Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks in Lewis and Clark, Broadwater and Jefferson Counties. Under the restrictions campfires may be built only in developed recreation sites such as campgrounds and picnic areas. Campfires in rock rings and the use of wood stoves in canvas tents outside of campgrounds and other developed sites are prohibited. The Helena Interagency Dispatch Center provides initial
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGY and COAL RESOURCES of NORTHERN TETON COUNTY, MONTANA. by EUGENE STEBINGER. the Paper Here Presented Describes the Coal R
    GEOLOGY AND COAL RESOURCES OF NORTHERN TETON COUNTY, MONTANA. By EUGENE STEBINGER. INTRODUCTION. The paper here presented describes the coal resources of a large area in Teton County,1 northwestern Montana, including the Black- feet Indian Eeservation and a considerable area of the country lying to the east. The scope of the paper is limited to a consideration only of those features having a bearing on the value and quantity of the coal present. The geology of the region is briefly described, the aim being to give a general understanding of the geologic setting in which the coals occur. Nearly all the rocks in northern Teton County belong to formations that are of the same age as others which, elsewhere in Montana, con­ tain almost all the coal found in the State. This fact led to several generous estimates as to the extent of the coal-bearing areas likely to be found in this region. Weed 2 and Rowe 3 have published maps on which the valuable bituminous coal area of the Great Falls field is shown as extending northward entirely across Teton County to the Canadian boundary. Similarly, the presence of an extensive coal field, long actively developed at Lethridge, Alberta, 50 miles north of the boundary, gave rise to forecasts that a southward extension of that field, following the strike of the geologic formations, would be found on the line of the Great Northern Railway in northern Teton County. The result of the present work shows that although the coal-bearing formation of the Great Falls field, the Kootenai forma­ tion, is present in the area here described, the only coal in it is a bed 6 or 8 inches thick in Marias Pass, also that although the horizon of the coal mined at Lethbridge is traceable entirely across this area, it shows only thin coal beds, nowhere over 18 inches thick.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM 1. Name of Property historic name: Dearborn River High Bridge other name/site number: 24LC130 2. Location street & number: Fifteen Miles Southwest of Augusta on Bean Lake Road not for publication: n/a vicinity: X city/town: Augusta state: Montana code: MT county: Lewis & Clark code: 049 zip code: 59410 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this _X_ nomination _ request for detenj ination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the proc urf I and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X_ meets _ does not meet the National Register Criterfi commend thatthis oroperty be considered significant _ nationally X statewide X locafly. Signa jre of oertifying officialn itle Date Montana State Historic Preservation Office State or Federal agency or bureau (_ See continuation sheet for additional comments. In my opinion, the property _ meets _ does not meet the National Register criteria. Signature of commenting or other official Date State or Federal agency and bureau 4. National Park Service Certification , he/eby certify that this property is: 'entered in the National Register _ see continuation sheet _ determined eligible for the National Register _ see continuation sheet _ determined not eligible for the National Register_ _ see continuation sheet _ removed from the National Register _see continuation sheet _ other (explain): _________________ Dearborn River High Bridge Lewis & Clark County.
    [Show full text]
  • Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences in Montana
    Report of Investigation 23 Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences in Montana Richard B. Berg 2015 Cover photo by Richard Berg. Sapphires (very pale green and colorless) concentrated by panning. The small red grains are garnets, commonly found with sapphires in western Montana, and the black sand is mainly magnetite. Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences, RI 23 Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences in Montana Richard B. Berg Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology MBMG Report of Investigation 23 2015 i Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences, RI 23 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................................1 Descriptions of Occurrences ..................................................................................................7 Selected Bibliography of Articles on Montana Sapphires ................................................... 75 General Montana ............................................................................................................75 Yogo ................................................................................................................................ 75 Southwestern Montana Alluvial Deposits........................................................................ 76 Specifi cally Rock Creek sapphire district ........................................................................ 76 Specifi cally Dry Cottonwood Creek deposit and the Butte area ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Recreational Trails Master Plan
    Beaverhead County Recreational Trails Master Plan Prepared by: Beaverhead County Recreational Trails Master Plan Prepared for: Beaverhead County Beaverhead County Commissioners 2 South Pacific Dillon, MT 59725 Prepared by: WWC Engineering 1275 Maple Street, Suite F Helena, MT 59601 (406) 443-3962 Fax: (406) 449-0056 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 1 Overview ...................................................................................................................... 1 Public Involvement .................................................................................................... 1 Key Components of the Plan ..................................................................................... 1 Intent of the Plan ....................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1 - Master Plan Overview................................................................................ 3 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 3 1.1.1 Project Location ............................................................................................... 3 1.2 Project Goals ......................................................................................................... 3 1.2.1 Variety of Uses ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri-Madison Project
    Hydropower Project Summary MISSOURI AND MADISON RIVERS, MONTANA MISSOURI-MADISON HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (P-2188) Hauser Dam Morony Dam Photos: PPL Montana This summary was produced by the Hydropower Reform Coalition and River Management Society Missouri and Madison Rivers, Montana MISSOURI AND MADISON RIVERS, MONTANA MISSOURI-MADISON HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (P-2188) DESCRIPTION: This hydropower license includes nine developments, of which eight were constructed between 1906 and 1930, and the ninth- the Cochrane dam- began operation in 1958. The projects are spread over 324 river-miles on the Missouri and Madison rivers. The Hebgen and Madison developments are located on the Madison River whereas the other seven- Hauser, Holter, Black Eagle, Rainbow, Cochrane, Ryan, and Morony- are located on the Missouri River. The Madison River flows into the Missouri River near the city of Three Forks, approximately 33 miles northwest of Bozeman. While this summary was being prepared, Northwestern Energy, a company based in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, and serving the Upper Midwest and Northwest, is in the process of acquiring this project. Read more at http://www.northwesternenergy.com/hydroelectric-facilities. A. SUMMARY 1. License application filed: November 25, 1992 2. License issued: September 27, 2000 3. License expiration: August 31, 2040 4. Waterway: Missouri and Madison Rivers 5. Capacity: 326.9 MW 6. Licensee: PPL Montana 7. Counties: Gallatin, Madison, Lewis and Clark, and Cascade Counties 8. Project area: Portions of the project are located on federal lands, including lands within the Gallatin and Helena National Forests 9. Project Website: http://www.pplmontana.com/producing+power/power+plants/PPL+Montana+Hyd ro.htm 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Recommendations to Prevent Nuisance Algae Conditions
    Wadeable Streams of Montana’s Hi-line Region: An Analysis of Their Nature and Condition, with an Emphasis on Factors Affecting Aquatic Plant Communities AND Recommendations to Prevent Nuisance Algae Conditions Prepared by Michael Suplee, Ph.D. May 2004 Montana Department of Environmental Quality Water Quality Standards Section 1520 E. 6th Ave P.O. Box 200901 Helena, MT 59620-0901 Wadeable Streams of Montana’s Hi-line Region: An Analysis of Their Nature and Condition, with an Emphasis on Factors Affecting Aquatic Plant Communities AND Recommendations to Prevent Nuisance Algae Conditions Prepared by Michael Suplee, Ph.D. May 2004 Montana Department of Environmental Quality Water Quality Standards Section 1520 E. 6th Ave P.O. Box 200901 Helena, MT 59620-0901 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project could not have been completed without the efforts of a number of people. I would like to thank the private landowners for granting us permission to carry out this study on their property, and I would like to thank the peoples of the Fort Peck Reservation for the same. I would particularly like to thank Dr. Vicki Watson of the University of Montana for her suggestions early in the project on study design and site selection, and for the innumerable conversations we had throughout the project that helped to improve it. I would also like to acknowledge John Lhotak and Marianne Zugel, both graduate students of Dr. Watson, whom conducted the vast majority of the field- work and much of the laboratory analyses. I would like to thank Rosie Sada de Suplee of the Montana Department of Environmental Quality for her assistance with early scouting efforts in the Hi-line region, and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Blacktail Deer Creek
    U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Yellowstone Center for Resources Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Program P.O. Box 168 Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming 82190 Cutthroat Trout Restoration Across Yellowstone’s Northern Range Phase I Completion Report YCR-2007-05 By: Michael E. Ruhl and Todd M. Koel 30 September 2007 Suggested citation: Ruhl, M.E. and T.M. Koel. 2007. Cutthroat trout restoration across Yellowstone’s Northern Range: Phase I completion report. National Park Service, Yellowstone Center for Resources, Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences Program, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, YCR-2007-05. ii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................... iv INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................... 4 Yellowstone National Park and Native Species Restoration ........................................ 4 The National Park Service and Native Fish Restoration............................................. 5 METHODS..................................................................................................................... 6 Literature Review ........................................................................................................... 6 Field Investigations.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bighorn Backcountry Public Land Use Zones 2019
    Edson 16 EDMONTON Hinton 47 22 Jasper 39 734 Bighorn Backcountry PLUZs 2 22 National Bighorn The Bighorn Backcountry is managed to ensure the Backcountry Park protection of the environment, while allowing responsible 11 and sustainable recreational use. The area includes more than Rocky 11 5,000 square kilometres (1.2 million acres) of public lands east Mountain House 54 of Banff and Jasper National Parks. 734 27 The Bighorn Backcountry hosts a large variety of recreational Banff National 22 activities including camping, OHV and snow vehicle use, hiking, shing, Park hunting and cycling. CALGARY 1 It is your responsibility to become familiar with the rules and activities allowed in this area before you visit and to be informed of any trail closures. Please refer to the map and chart in this pamphlet for further details. Visitors who do not follow the rules could be ned or charged under provincial legislation. If you have any concerns about the condition of the trails and campsites or their appropriate use, please call Alberta Environment and Parks at the Rocky Mountain House Ofce, 403-845-8250. (Dial 310-0000 for toll-free service.) For current trail conditions and information kiosk locations, please visit the Bighorn Backcountry website at www.alberta.ca Definitions for the Bighorn Backcountry Motorized User ✑ recreational user of both off-highway vehicles and snow vehicles. Equestrian User or ✑ recreational user of both horses and/or mules, used for trail riding, pack Equine horse, buggy/cart, covered wagon or horse-drawn sleigh. Non-Motorized User ✑ recreational user which is non-motorized except equestrian user or equine where specified or restricted.
    [Show full text]
  • EARLY DAYS in the FOREST SERVICE Volume 2
    EARLY DAYS IN THE FOREST SERVICE Volume 2 Compiled and Edited by Jessie Thompson 1955 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE Northern Region Missoula, Montana TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Cover Photo: Northern Region Fire Warehouse, 240 West Pine, Missoula, Montana, about 1922. Stories By: JACK CLACK (Retired 1933) "A Trip Down the Flathead" JACK CLACK "Battle of Belton" CLYDE P. FICKES (Retired 1948) "Forest Ranger, 1907" LEON C. HURTT (Retired 1951) "Transportation, Then and Now" DAVID LAKE (Retired 1940) "Early Day Experiences" DAVID LAKE "The Snowy Mountain Fire of 1900" ROY A. PHILLIPS (Retired 1951) "Recollections" G.I. PORTER (Retired 1942) "The Major and the Miner" G.I. PORTER "The Ranger's Wife" G.I. PORTER "Reminiscences of G.I. Porter" CHARLIE E. POWELL (Retired 1955) "Recollections" THEODORE SHOEMAKER (Retired 1938) "Fighting Forest Fires -- Then and Now" THEODORE SHOEMAKER "Memories" K.D. SWAN (Retired 1941) "Musselshell Reminiscences" RYLE TEED (Retired 1952) "Reminiscences of Early Days In The Forest Service" C.S. WEBB (Retired 1914) "Some Incidents Occuring During My Employment With The U.S. Forest Service, 1913- 1949" WALLACE W. WEBER (Retired 1949) "Rafting the Flathead" WILLIAM G. WEIGLE "Reminisces" Index (omitted from the online edition) LIST OF FIGURES 1. Jack Clack, center, then deputy supervisor of Flathead National Forest, 1915, on the trail up the South Fork of the Flathead River in Montana. 2. First Prefire Ranger Meeting, Bitterroot-Idaho National Forest, 1907. Major Frank Fenn, Supervisor. 3. Old Store Building, 1927, Diamond City, Montana, Confederate Gulch. Helena National Forest. 4. Libby-Troy Road in Montana, 1915, Kootenai National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Fishing Regulations
    MONTANA FISHING REGULATIONS 20March 1, 2018 — F1ebruary 828, 2019 Fly fishing the Missouri River. Photo by Jason Savage For details on how to use these regulations, see page 2 fwp.mt.gov/fishing With your help, we can reduce poaching. MAKE THE CALL: 1-800-TIP-MONT FISH IDENTIFICATION KEY If you don’t know, let it go! CUTTHROAT TROUT are frequently mistaken for Rainbow Trout (see pictures below): 1. Turn the fish over and look under the jaw. Does it have a red or orange stripe? If yes—the fish is a Cutthroat Trout. Carefully release all Cutthroat Trout that cannot be legally harvested (see page 10, releasing fish). BULL TROUT are frequently mistaken for Brook Trout, Lake Trout or Brown Trout (see below): 1. Look for white edges on the front of the lower fins. If yes—it may be a Bull Trout. 2. Check the shape of the tail. Bull Trout have only a slightly forked tail compared to the lake trout’s deeply forked tail. 3. Is the dorsal (top) fin a clear olive color with no black spots or dark wavy lines? If yes—the fish is a Bull Trout. Carefully release Bull Trout (see page 10, releasing fish). MONTANA LAW REQUIRES: n All Bull Trout must be released immediately in Montana unless authorized. See Western District regulations. n Cutthroat Trout must be released immediately in many Montana waters. Check the district standard regulations and exceptions to know where you can harvest Cutthroat Trout. NATIVE FISH Westslope Cutthroat Trout Species of Concern small irregularly shaped black spots, sparse on belly Average Size: 6”–12” cutthroat slash— spots
    [Show full text]