DOCSLIB.ORG

DRAFT 2019-2020 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DRAFT 2019-2020 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) City and County of San Francisco DRAFT 2019-2020 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) For Public Review and Comment Between November 30, 2020 and December 14, 2020 Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development Office of Economic and Workforce Development Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing One South Van Ness Avenue, Fifth Floor San Francisco, CA 94103 Phone: 415-701-5500; TDD: 415-701-5503 Website: www.sfmohcd.org Welcome to San Francisco’s DRAFT 2019-2020 CAPER. NOTES FOR PUBLIC REVIEW and COMMENT: 1) This draft document is available for public review and comment between November 30 and December 14, 2020. 2) Due to the current shelter in place order, hard copies of this document will not be available. 3) Staff welcomes your comments in writing via email. They may be directed to [email protected]. In your comment, please be specific about your issue and refer to a specific section of the Draft document, if appropriate. 4) The close of the public comment period is December 14, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. 5) Thank you in advance for your participation in this process Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development (MOHCD) Overview of Plans - Context for this Document MOHCD Strategic Plan Overarching department goals MOHCD Annual Report Progress to Strategic Plan goals; includes legislatively-mandated reporting HUD-Required Plans Additional MOHCD Plans Consolidated Plan HIV Housing Plan Goals for addressing the housing needs of H ousing and community development goals HIV+ households Annual Action Plan Summary of activities and resources Racial Equity Action Plan for Consolidated Plan goals Vision and activities for achieving racial equity in department policies and practices CAPER (Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report) - Progress to Digital Equity Plan Consolidated Plan goals Goals for improving digital access and literacy Analysis of Impediments (to Fair Housing Choice) - Analysis of conditions that affect the location, availability and accessibility of housing CR-05 - Goals and Outcomes Progress the jurisdiction has made in carrying out its strategic plan and its action plan. 91.520(a) This could be an overview that includes major initiatives and highlights that were proposed and executed throughout the program year. The overarching objectives for San Francisco’s use of funds, including CDBG, ESG, HOME and HOPWA funds, as reflected in its 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan are the following: • Families and individuals are stably housed; • Communities have healthy physical, social and business infrastructure; and, • Families and individuals are resilient and economically self-sufficient. For each objective, there are priority needs and for each priority need, there are goals. The City is dedicated to the articulation of specific performance measures for each goal, to ensure that we are investing our resources to achieve optimal outcomes for our communities. We developed a Five-year Performance Measures Matrix to assess investment outcomes across the 2015-2019 timeframe of the Consolidated Plan. Performance under each measure will be tracked against a five-year goal and a one-year goal. Comparison of the proposed versus actual outcomes for each outcome measure submitted with the consolidated plan and explain, if applicable, why progress was not made toward meeting goals and objectives. 91.520(g) Categories, priority levels, funding sources and amounts, outcomes/objectives, goal outcome indicators, units of measure, targets, actual outcomes/outputs, and percentage completed for each of the grantee’s program year goals. Objective 1: Families and Individuals are Stably Housed Priority Need 1A: Develop and Maintain Affordable Housing Goal 1Ai. Increased supply of affordable housing 5- year Expected Year 5 Expected 5- Actual 5-year Actual Year 1 (2015- Actual Year 2 (2016- Actual Year 3 (2017- Actual Year 4 (2018- Actual Year 5 (2019- Funding Amount Actual (2019-2020) $ year $ Amount $ Amount 2016) $ Amount 2017) $ Amount 2018) $ Amount 2019) $ Amount 2020) $ Amount % of Amount Goal HOME $15,201,664 $22,681,296 149% $8,134,000 $10,947,296 $3,600,000 $3,600,000 General Fund $0 $72,225,938 $72,225,938 Housing Trust $32,661,584 $14,796,497 45% $2,169,139 $9,099,649 $3,527,709 Fund Housing Impact $700,822,879 $122,712,708 18% $11,566,906 $21,526,407 $23,761,130 $31,555,959 $66,901,273 Fees $34,302,306 CAPER 1 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Low-Mod Income Housing Asset $2,205,679 $4,778,432 217% $2,778,432 $2,000,000 Fund Other $199,305,098 $176,563,488 89% $12,641,612 $13,000,000 $1,000,000 $29,308,676 $5,680,000 $120,613,200 OCII $367,336,000 $133,432,560 36% $24,677,477 $40,250,000 $27,273,256 $41,231,827 Total $1,317,532,904 $547,190,918 42% $61,967,566 $94,823,352 $57,562,094 $102,096,462 $76,181,273 $230,741,444 5- Actual Year 1 Actual Year 2 Actual Year 3 Actual Year 4 Expected Year 5 Actual Year 5 Performance year Measures: 5-year Actual 5-year Goal Actual Outcome to Date Actual $ Actual $ % of Actual # Actual # Actual $ Amt Actual # Actual # Actual $ Amt Goal $ Amt Actual # Actual $ Amt Indicators Amt Amt Goal Outcome Indicator 1Ai. Number of 5,549 77% 924 $61,967,566 1,868 $94,823,352 413 $59,683,688 493 $102,096,462 $76,700,695 $230,741,444 affordable 4,281 678 583 housing units created 5- Actual Year 1 Actual Year 2 Actual Year 3 Actual Year 4 Expected Year 5 Actual Year 5 Performance year Measures: 5-year Actual 5-year Goal Actual Output to Date Actual $ Actual $ % of Actual # Actual # Actual $ Amt Actual # Actual # Actual $ Amt Goal $ Amt Actual # Actual $ Amt Indicators Amt Amt Goal Output Indicator: Number of Permanent Supportive 67 72% 25 $6,114,474 23 $2,000,000 0 $270,000 $0 $2,000,000 0 $2,600,250 Housing units 48 - - built for TAY (Parcel U, 17th & Folsom) Output Indicator: Number of Permanent Supportive 504 76% 98 $2,169,139 144 $2,500,000 0 $0 $10,887,239 $18,178,806 103 $101,219,290 382 37 102 Housing units built for seniors (24th St) CAPER 2 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Output Indicator: Number of Permanent Supportive 260 64% 50 $1,250,000 0 $0 12 $9,608,672 $506,000 $13,800,000 105 $20,055,000 167 - 105 Housing units built for veterans (MBS3E) Output Indicator: Number of Permanent Supportive Housing units built for 641 60% 51 $5,824,585 278 $22,580,838 40 $11,516,655 $4,233,926 $28,181,652 0 $11,000,000 homeless families 384 15 174 (20% set-aside for MBS6E, Parcel O, 1950 Mission, SWL 322-1, MBS6W) Output Indicator: Number of affordable housing units built for low- income households at or below 60% AMI (non-homeless 2,912 68% 420 $46,609,368 887 $67,742,514 137 $38,288,361 $79,048,907 $14,540,237 251 $76,017,303 1,974 279 97 units for homeless family projects listed above, plus Alice Griffith Ph 1-3, HP Block 49, MBS7W, TB6, TB7) Output Indicator: Number of BMR housing units 1,000 131% 280 536 224 141 200 124 1,305 developed (884 MOHCD CAPER 3 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) inclusionary + 214 OCII inclusionary) Output Indicator: Number of workforce TBD 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $7,420,390 0 $19,849,601 housing units 21 21 developed beyond BMR Goal 1Aii. Preserve and Maintain Affordable Housing Supply 5- year Expected Year 5 Expected 5- Actual 5-year Actual Year 1 (2015- Actual Year 2 (2016- Actual Year 3 (2017- Actual Year 4 (2018- Actual Year 5 (2019- Funding Amount Actual (2019-2020) $ year $ Amount $ Amount 2016) $ Amount 2017) $ Amount 2018) $ Amount 2019) $ Amount 2020) $ Amount % of Amount Goal CDBG $26,247,066 $10,490,093 40% $716,022 $3,500,000 $2,984,209 $2,393,734 $3,354,470 $896,128 HOME $8,000,000 $6,666,385 83% $1,390,525 $85,975 $1,900,000 $5,189,885 HOPWA $0 $152,000 $152,000 General Fund $3,449,383 $26,257,598 761% $26,257,598 Housing Trust $136,029,023 $56,643,261 42% $28,933,500 $2,847,704 $3,979,061 $683,121 $65,497,712 $20,199,875 Fund Housing Impact $126,805,070 $51,546,657 41% $8,626,774 $20,674,120 $8,157,233 $6,495,939 $15,657,886 $7,592,591 Fees Low-Mod Income Housing Asset $16,496,251 $49,310,242 299% $15,231,776 $11,559,979 $3,339,975 $0 $400,000 $19,178,512 Fund Other $145,486,217 $140,898,678 97% $18,914,939 $34,339,655 $13,650,677 $12,512,190 $18,881,886 $61,481,217 OCII $19,547,988 $9,749,278 50% $3,290,119 $6,459,159 Total $482,060,998 $351,714,191 73% $72,423,011 $77,754,102 $38,656,288 $22,084,984 $105,691,954 $140,795,806 5- Actual Year 1 Actual Year 2 Actual Year 3 Actual Year 4 Expected Year 5 Actual Year 5 Performance year Measures: 5-year Actual 5-year Goal Actual Outcome to Date Actual $ Actual $ % of Actual # Actual # Actual $ Amt Actual # Actual # Actual $ Amt Goal $ Amt Actual # Actual $ Amt Indicators Amt Amt Goal CAPER 4 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Outcome Indicator: Number of $107,226,48 affordable 4,472 88% 1,327 $72,028,633 $77,754,102 $36,667,977 $21,691,250 $140,709,695 3,931 1,516 619 38 406 4 431 housing units preserved or maintained 5- Actual Year 1 Actual Year 2 Actual Year 3 Actual Year 4 Expected Year 5 Actual Year 5 Performance year Measures: 5-year Actual 5-year Goal Actual Output to Date Actual $ Actual $ % of Actual # Actual # Actual $ Amt Actual # Actual # Actual $ Amt Goal $ Amt Actual # Actual $ Amt Indicators Amt Amt Goal Output Indicator: Number of units where lead 75 7% 2 $23,550 1 $30,281 2 $28,873 $0 $40,000 0 $0 5 - 2 hazards are addressed Output Indicator: Number of public housing units converted to private 2,279 94% 1,128 $53,084,699 1,021 $14,373,118 0 $2,779,061 $6,189,277 $0 0 $2,021,668 ownership under 2,149 - - the Rental Assistance Demonstration program Output Indicator: Number of single 115 417% 45 $698,095 1 $30,281 198 219 family homes 480 17 23 rehabilitated Output Indicator: Number of 1,320 72% 134 $13,267,673 307 $36,627,329 400 $16,883,499 $13,201,973 $73,784,100 87 $93,380,075 multifamily units 949 21 381 rehabilitated Output Indicator: Number of public housing units 683 51% 18 $4,954,616 186 $26,693,093 19 $16,976,544 $2,300,000 $33,402,384 125 $45,307,952 348 - rebuilt under HOPE SF Priority Need 1B: Make Housing Affordable CAPER 5 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FY 18-19 Annual Report
    YERBA BUENA DISCOVER THE UNEXPECTED YBCBD ANNUAL REPORT 2018–2019 DISCOVER THE UNEXPECTED Dear Friends and Neighbors, ARTIST JR CREATES AN ORIGINAL MURAL IN YERBA BUENA It’s certain that residents, workers, and visitors to Yerba Buena will experience something new, exciting, and inspiring. The neighborhood’s tapestry is one of renown museums and galleries, landscaped gardens, and major convention facilities. There are unique places to dine, shop, and play. Amid all of this is an exhibition of public art, culinary and architectural excellence, and CITY AT NIGHT: YERBA BUENA UNDER A FULL MOON entertainment offerings unique to the city. To sustain and improve Yerba Buena’s unique characteristics, the YBCBD provides services to help make the neighborhood cleaner, safer, and even more inviting. Thank you to all who help us make Yerba Buena an exceptional place for people of all ages and backgrounds. It’s been an exciting and productive year. We’re thrilled that public art and artistry in the neighborhood grew to new heights — adding to unexpected moments of inspiration and wonder. As part of the Moscone Center expansion, there are now several new works of public art in and around the Moscone Center and Yerba Buena Gardens. The new collection augments major works that the YBCBD helped bring to the neighborhood. Yerba Buena’s ingenuity also extends to its renowned restaurants, architecture, and landscaped spaces. It is reflected in the hundreds of different performances each year of the Yerba Buena Gardens Festival, at the YBCBD’s annual Yerba Buena Night of music, dance and performance, and at our monthly theatrical neighborhood walks.
    [Show full text]
  • H. Parks, Recreation and Open Space
    IV. Environmental Setting and Impacts H. Parks, Recreation and Open Space Environmental Setting The San Francisco Recreation and Park Department maintains more than 200 parks, playgrounds, and open spaces throughout the City. The City’s park system also includes 15 recreation centers, nine swimming pools, five golf courses as well as tennis courts, ball diamonds, athletic fields and basketball courts. The Recreation and Park Department manages the Marina Yacht Harbor, Candlestick (Monster) Park, the San Francisco Zoo, and the Lake Merced Complex. In total, the Department currently owns and manages roughly 3,380 acres of parkland and open space. Together with other city agencies and state and federal open space properties within the city, about 6,360 acres of recreational resources (a variety of parks, walkways, landscaped areas, recreational facilities, playing fields and unmaintained open areas) serve San Francisco.172 San Franciscans also benefit from the Bay Area regional open spaces system. Regional resources include public open spaces managed by the East Bay Regional Park District in Alameda and Contra Costa counties; the National Park Service in Marin, San Francisco and San Mateo counties as well as state park and recreation areas throughout. In addition, thousands of acres of watershed and agricultural lands are preserved as open spaces by water and utility districts or in private ownership. The Bay Trail is a planned recreational corridor that, when complete, will encircle San Francisco and San Pablo Bays with a continuous 400-mile network of bicycling and hiking trails. It will connect the shoreline of all nine Bay Area counties, link 47 cities, and cross the major toll bridges in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Changemakers: Biographies of African Americans in San Francisco Who Made a Difference
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Leo T. McCarthy Center for Public Service and McCarthy Center Student Scholarship the Common Good 2020 Changemakers: Biographies of African Americans in San Francisco Who Made a Difference David Donahue Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.usfca.edu/mccarthy_stu Part of the History Commons CHANGEMAKERS AFRICAN AMERICANS IN SAN FRANCISCO WHO MADE A DIFFERENCE Biographies inspired by San Francisco’s Ella Hill Hutch Community Center murals researched, written, and edited by the University of San Francisco’s Martín-Baró Scholars and Esther Madríz Diversity Scholars CHANGEMAKERS: AFRICAN AMERICANS IN SAN FRANCISCO WHO MADE A DIFFERENCE © 2020 First edition, second printing University of San Francisco 2130 Fulton Street San Francisco, CA 94117 Published with the generous support of the Walter and Elise Haas Fund, Engage San Francisco, The Leo T. McCarthy Center for Public Service and the Common Good, The University of San Francisco College of Arts and Sciences, University of San Francisco Student Housing and Residential Education The front cover features a 1992 portrait of Ella Hill Hutch, painted by Eugene E. White The Inspiration Murals were painted in 1999 by Josef Norris, curated by Leonard ‘Lefty’ Gordon and Wendy Nelder, and supported by the San Francisco Arts Commission and the Mayor’s Offi ce Neighborhood Beautifi cation Project Grateful acknowledgment is made to the many contributors who made this book possible. Please see the back pages for more acknowledgments. The opinions expressed herein represent the voices of students at the University of San Francisco and do not necessarily refl ect the opinions of the University or our sponsors.
    [Show full text]
  • Metreon San Francisco, California
    Metreon San Francisco, California Project Type: Commercial/Industrial Case No: C030001 Year: 2000 SUMMARY A 350,000-square-foot urban entertainment center on a 2.75-acre site in downtown San Francisco. Developed by Millenium Partners and WDG Ventures, the project is located within the 87-acre Yerba Buena Center. Within the first few months of its opening in June 1999, Metreon attracted some 2.5 million visitors. As many as 40,000 people have visited on peak-period weekends. The four-level project offers amusements, games, shopping, restaurants, a food court, and cinemas—including a 600-seat SONY•IMAX theater, the largest of its type on the West Coast—enlivening the evening activity of the Yerba Buena Gardens neighborhood. FEATURES Urban entertainment center Downtown development Ground lease Interactive entertainment Metreon San Francisco, California Project Type: Retail/Entertainment Volume 30 Number 01 January-March 2000 Case Number: C030001 PROJECT TYPE A 350,000-square-foot urban entertainment center on a 2.75-acre site in downtown San Francisco. Developed by Millenium Partners and WDG Ventures, the project is located within the 87-acre Yerba Buena Center. Within the first few months of its opening in June 1999, Metreon attracted some 2.5 million visitors. As many as 40,000 people have visited on peak-period weekends. The four-level project offers amusements, games, shopping, restaurants, a food court, and cinemas—including a 600-seat SONY•IMAX theater, the largest of its type on the West Coast—enlivening the evening activity of the Yerba Buena Gardens neighborhood. SPECIAL FEATURES Urban entertainment center Downtown development Ground lease Interactive entertainment DEVELOPER Yerba Buena Retail Partners Millenium Partners 1995 Broadway, 3rd Floor New York, New York 10023 212-595-1600 WDG Ventures 107 Stevenson Street 5th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 415-896-2300 ARCHITECT Simon Martin-Vegue Winkelstein Moris 501 Second Street Suite 701 San Francisco, California 94107 415-546-0400 Gary E.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019/2020 (Pdf)
    Grants for the Arts Annual Report 2019 / 2020 Contents Grants for the Arts: A Continuing Legacy of Support 3 for San Francisco Arts and Culture Grants for the Arts FY 2019-2020 Budget 5 Grants for the Arts Programs 6 Annual Grants to San Francisco Arts Organizations 7 Parades and Festivals 43 Cultural Centers 46 Re-Granting Programs 47 Grantee Services 48 Arts and Tourism and Other Programs 49 Grants for the Arts 401 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 321 San Francisco, CA 94102 T: 415.554.6710 F: 415.554.6711 www.sfgfta.org GFTA Staff Matthew Goudeau, Director Jason Blackwell, Associate Director Khan Wong, Senior Program Manager Ecaterina Burton, Senior Finance, Data & Operations Analyst Valerie Tookes, Adjunct Senior Operations & Finance Manager Kara Owens, Program Coordinator Annual Report: San Francisco Study Center Edits: Mike Ortiz, Repromail © 2019-2020, Grants for the Arts Cover images: Illuminate the Arts’ Pink Triangle at sunset. PHOTO: Matt Biddulph • Visitors view Ficre Ghebreyesus’ Zemesh Behr’s Magic Garden as part of the Ficre Ghebreyesus: City with a River Running Through exhibition at theMuseum of the African Diaspora. PHOTO: Kelly Stuckley, Jr. • Urban Jazz Dance Company dancers from left to right: Antoine Hunter, Zahna Simon, and Leah Maim Mendelson. PHOTO: RJ Muna • All Nations Drums sing an Honor Song in recognition of Opening Night at the 44th Annual American Indian Film Festival at Brava Theatre. presented by theAmerican Indian Film Institute. PHOTO: BKS Photography • Eye Zen Presents OUT of Site: SOMA with actors, from left to right, Ryan Hayes, Brian Freeman, Marga Gomez, and Landa Lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Mjm Management Group Invitation for Bids for Security Surveillance
    MJM MANAGEMENT GROUP INVITATION FOR BIDS FOR SECURITY SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS & CONTROL ROOM UPGRADE YERBA BUENA GARDENS, SAN FRANCISCO, CA Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms, Conditions of Contract Date of Issuance: January 24, 2020 Pre-Bid Meeting: February 14, 2020 10:00 AM Requests for Information Due: February 21, 2020 5:00 PM RFI Responses Due: February 28, 2020 5:00 PM Bids Due: March 6, 2020 12:00 PM Mary McCue and Brian Sales MJM Management Group Yerba Buena Gardens 750 Howard Street San Francisco, California 94103 Phone: (415) 820-3566 Email: [email protected] INVITATION FOR BIDS (IFB) YBG Security Camera Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS ........................................................................................................................... 1 GENERAL CONDITIONS AND INSTRUCTION FOR BIDDERS ............................................................................ 1 1. DEFINITION OF TERMS ................................................................................................................ 1 2. EXPLANATIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS ................................................................................. 2 3. FORM OF BID AND SIGNATURE ................................................................................................ 2 4. BID FORM ....................................................................................................................................... 2 5. OR APPROVED EQUAL CLAUSE ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • University of California Santa Cruz
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ PRECARIOUS CITY: MARGINAL WORKERS, THE STATE, AND WORKING-CLASS ACTIVISM IN POST-INDUSTRIAL SAN FRANCISCO, 1964-1979 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in HISTORY by Laura Renata Martin March 2014 The dissertation of Laura Renata Martin is approved: ------------------------------------------------------- Professor Dana Frank, chair ------------------------------------------------------- Professor David Brundage ------------------------------------------------------- Professor Alice Yang ------------------------------------------------------- Professor Eileen Boris ------------------------------------------------------- Tyrus Miller, Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Table of Contents Introduction. 1 Chapter One. The War Over the War on Poverty: Civil Rights Groups, the War on Poverty, and the “Democratization” of the Great Society 53 Chapter Two. Crisis of Social Reproduction: Organizing Around Public Housing and Welfare Rights 107 Chapter Three. Policing and Black Power: The Hunters Point Riot, The San Francisco Police Department, and The Black Panther Party 171 Chapter Four. Labor Against the Working Class: The International Longshore Workers’ Union, Organized Labor, and Downtown Redevelopment 236 Chapter Five. Contesting Sexual Labor in the Post-Industrial City: Prostitution, Policing, and Sex Worker Organizing in the Tenderloin 296 Conclusion. 364 Bibliography. 372 iii Abstract Precarious City: Marginal Workers, the State, and Working-Class Activism in Post- Industrial San Francisco, 1964-1979 Laura Renata Martin This project investigates the effects of San Francisco’s transition from an industrial to a post-industrial economy on the city’s social movements between 1964 and 1979. I re-contextualize the city’s Black freedom, feminist, and gay and transgender liberation movements as struggles over the changing nature of urban working-class life and labor in the postwar period.
    [Show full text]
  • Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Day Interfaith Service Yerba Buena Gardens Esplanade Monday, January 21, 2013
    Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Day Interfaith Service Yerba Buena Gardens Esplanade Monday, January 21, 2013 Remarks by Michael G. Pappas, Executive Director Good afternoon, I’m Michael Pappas, Executive Director of the San Francisco Interfaith Council and a member of the SF Human Rights Commission. I join our Chair Rita Semel in welcoming you to this auspicious dual celebration, the Birthday of Civil Rights Leader the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the 2nd inauguration of the first African-American President Barack Obama. It is appropriate that we should come together for prayer and thanksgiving, in an interfaith celebration as, not only was Dr. King a pastor of immeasurable faith, but every social justice and civil rights movement marked in our nation’s history has been led by leaders of faith. In particular, here in San Francisco, in the early days of the Civil Rights Movement, before there was the San Francisco Interfaith Council, faith leaders from every tradition came together, through the Conference on Religion, Race and Social Concerns to proclaim, with a unified and prophetic voice, the Almighty’s call for freedom and equality for all people. At that same time our City responded to unconscionable and pressing racial injustices being perpetrated, by forming the San Francisco Human Rights Commission, the official independent 1 body of our City charged with stewardship of discrimination cases in San Francisco. It was as Director of that Commission that Mayor Edwin Lee began his career in public service. On this day Mayor Lee is proudly representing our City in Washington, DC at the inauguration of President Obama.
    [Show full text]
  • RF Annual Report
    1998 ANNUAL REPORT ABOUT THE FOUNDATION – THE FOUNDATION The Rockefeller Foundation is a philanthropic organization endowed by John D. Rockefeller and chartered in 1913 for the well-being of people throughout the world. It is one of America's oldest private foundations and one of the few with strong international interests. From its beginning, the Foundation has sought to identify, and address at their source, the causes of human suffering and need. In 1998 Foundation programs were organized around eight core strategies listed on the following page. Together, these strategies constituted the Foundation's commitment to help define and pursue a path toward environmentally sustainable development consistent with individual rights and a more equitable sharing of the world's resources. The Foundation's work in 1998 was divided among the following program areas: the arts and humanities, equal opportunity, agricultural sciences, health sciences, population sciences, global environment, and special African initiatives including female education. The balance of the Foundation's 1998 grant and fellowship programs supported work in building democracy, international security, international philanthropy, and other special interests and initiatives. While concentrating its efforts in these areas over the past year, the Foundation is in the process of adjusting its course and defining a new organizational program structure for 1999 and beyond. The Foundation maintains the Bellagio Study and Conference Center in northern Italy for conferences of international scope and for residencies for artists, scholars and policymakers, and other professionals from around the world. The Foundation is administered by its president through a staff working in six locations: New York City, Cairo, Nairobi, Mexico City, Bangkok and Lilongwe, Malawi.
    [Show full text]
  • YERBA BUENA GARDENS 1999 Rudy Bruner Award
    HOME T.O.C. 1 2 3 4 5 BOOK 1995 1997 1999 2001 ? CHAPTER 1 Yerba Buena Gardens 1999 Rudy Bruner Award GOLD medal winner YERBA BUENA GARDENS San Francisco, California RUDY BRUNER AWARD 1 HOME T.O.C. 1 2 3 4 5 BOOK 1995 1997 1999 2001 ? GOLD MEDAL WINNER Yerba Buena Gardens 2 RUDY BRUNER AWARD HOME T.O.C. 1 2 3 4 5 BOOK 1995 1997 1999 2001 ? CHAPTER 1 Yerba Buena Gardens YERBA BUENA GARDENS AT A GLANCE WHO MADE THE SUBMISSION? F San Francisco Redevelopment Agency, Helen L. Sause, Deputy Executive Director. WHAT IS YERBA BUENA GARDENS? Economic Development F Yerba Buena Gardens is an 87-acre urban redevelopment F A wide range of rental and condominium residential facili- project in the South of Market (SOMA) district of San ties, including complexes for low-income seniors and Francisco that includes a mixture of housing, open space, working poor as well as market-rate units. cultural facilities, children’s facilities, a convention center, F and commercial development. A convention center supported by a mixture of hotels, commercial, and entertainment facilities. F A highly popular destination for tourists from around the Arts and Urban Amenities country and the world. F A world-class cultural community comprising more than F Three high-rise office buildings. two dozen museums and galleries, including the San Fran- cisco Museum of Modern Art (SFMoMA), a Center for the Arts (CFA) complex, a Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial, Community Development and Social Justice and a youth-oriented arts facility, “Zeum.” F A series of public-private partnerships that have reclaimed a F A 10-acre complex of children’s facilities including an ice neighborhood from the displacement caused by the “bull- skating rink and a bowling alley, a youth-oriented cultural dozer” planning of 1950s and 1960s urban renewal.
    [Show full text]
  • SF Parklet: Modular Kit of Parts Phase I
    SF PARKLET Perkins+Will Innovation Incubator - Phase I contents 1. OVERVIEW 5 2. CITY AND COMMUNITY LIAISON 9 3. LOCATION ANALYSIS 15 4. PARKLET INSPIRATION 33 5. DESIGN STUDIES 49 6. NEXT STEPS 79 1. Overviewopen space opportunity THE OPEN SPACE OPPORTUNITY TURNING PAVEMENT TO PARKS San Francisco’s streets and public right-of-ways make up fully 25% of the city’s land area, more space than found in Local design firms, non-profits, community organizers, and all of the city’s parks. Many of the streets are excessively residents in San Francisco have inspired a recovery of paved wide and contain large zones of wasted space, especially at spaces recreated as urban oases. The city of San Francisco, intersections. along with designers, have begun to turn small paved San Francisco’s new “Pavement to Parks” projects seek to intersections and parking spaces into artistic green spaces and temporarily reclaim these unused swathes and quickly and sidewalk extensions. The official name for the city program inexpensively turn them into new public plazas and parks. is Pavement to Parks, which has created quite a stir within During the temporary closure, the success of these plazas will the local city community. The San Francisco Tourism Bureau be evaluated to understand what adjustments need to be made hopes that the projects will add interest to neighborhoods and in the short term and ultimately whether the temporary closure attract foot traffic to local businesses. In general, community should be a long term community investment. members have responded well to the recapturing of urban space from automobile use and many generally aknowlegde the A Parklet is a type of Pavement to Parks project.
    [Show full text]
  • Adelaide J Barroga Practicing Artist Self JEANNIE BARROGA, a Dramatists Guild Lifetime Member, Has Been Active 35 of Her 40 Theater Years in the Bay Area
    Legal Name Artistic Involvement Organization Name Please include a short bio: Adelaide J Barroga Practicing Artist self JEANNIE BARROGA, a Dramatists Guild Lifetime Member, has been active 35 of her 40 theater years in the Bay Area. After founding the Palo Alto Playwright Forum, she was TheatreWorks literary manager through 2003 (plus OET?s). She has had productions at Pan Asian Repertory, New York, and in Seattle, Honolulu, San Jose, Berkeley, Palo Alto, etc. WALLS, published, anthologized, and in theses, received the Gerbode / Hewlett Foundation grant. TALK-STORY at TheatreWorks was workshopped at the Mark Taper Forum. She received the NEA Access for Artistic Excellence Award, a Bay Area Playwrights Contest award, L.A. Maverick Award, the Tino and Joey Awards, and a CalArts Herb Alpert Award nomination. She co-produced short films and webisodes on YouTube. Selected 2000 productions include BANYAN, GADGETS, BUFFALO?ED and a MATTIE MAE?S workshop on the Richmond shipyards. Barroga served on panels for Theatre Communications Group, the National Endowment for the Arts, the Massachusetts Arts Council, the San Francisco Arts Commission, and at the Santa Clara, Oakland, and Marin Arts Councils. Currently she has two book drafts: a collection of Bay Area Filipino American Theater Artists and in fiction, TURN RIGHT AT THE WATER BUFFALO. Her collection is at Stanford Green Library Special Collections. Amanda Vigil Practicing Artist SFUSD Amanda Vigil Is passionate about media, art & education, as a San Francisco born and raised filmmaker, educator, & performance artist her work has been seen locally and internationally in San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Berlin, Germany.
    [Show full text]