Novel <I>Curvularia</I>
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Investigations on the Occurrence of Fungal Root Endophytes and an Associated Mycovirus in Context with Apple Replant Disease
Investigations on the occurrence of fungal root endophytes and an associated mycovirus in context with apple replant disease Von der Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover zur Erlangung des Grades Doktorin der Gartenbauwissenschaften (Dr. rer. hort.) genehmigte Dissertation von Gösta Carolin Dorette Popp, M. Sc. 2020 Referent: Prof. Dr. Edgar Maiss Korreferentin: Prof. Dr. Traud Winkelmann Tag der Promotion: 12.08.2020 Abstract I Abstract Apple replant disease (ARD) negatively affects the production in nurseries and orchards worldwide. A biotic cause of the disease is most likely since soil disinfection can restore plant growth. Fungi have appeared to contribute to the complex of biotic factors, but up to now the actual cause of the disease remains unknown. Further, environmentally friendly and practically applicable mitigation strategies are missing. Fungal root endophytes were isolated in two central experiments of the ORDIAmur consortium. Dark septate endophytes (Leptodontidium spp.) were frequently isolated from apple roots. An abundant occurrence of Nectriaceae fungi (Dactylonectria torresensis and Ilyonectria robusta) was found in ARD roots. Reference sites displayed a different characteristic fungal community. In roots grown in irradiated soil, a reduction of the number of isolated fungi and a changed composition of the fungal community was found. To investigate the effect of fungal endophytes on apple plants a quick and soil-free bio test in Petri dishes was developed using perlite. Inoculated fungi isolated from ARD roots induced neutral (Plectosphaerella, Pleotrichocladium, and Zalerion) to negative (Cadophora, Calonectria, Dactylonectria, Ilyonectria, and Leptosphaeria) plant reactions. After re-isolation, most of the Nectriaceae isolates were confirmed as pathogens. Microscopic analyses of ARD-affected roots revealed necroses caused by an unknown fungus that forms cauliflower-like (CF) structures in diseased cortex cells. -
Composition and Genetic Diversity of the Nicotiana Tabacum Microbiome in Different Topographic Areas and Growth Periods
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 15 August 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201808.0268.v1 Peer-reviewed version available at Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3421; doi:10.3390/ijms19113421 Composition and Genetic Diversity of the Nicotiana tabacum Microbiome in Different Topographic Areas and Growth Periods Xiaolong Yuan 1, Xinmin Liu 1, Yongmei Du1, Guoming Shen1, Zhongfeng Zhang 1, Jinhai Li 2, Peng Zhang 1* 1.Tobacco Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, China, 266101. 2. China National Tobacco Corporation in Hubei province, Wuhan, China,430000. *Correspondence: Peng Zhang, [email protected]. Abstract: Fungal endophytes are the most ubiquitous plant symbionts on earth and are phylogenetically diverse. Studies on the fungal endophytes in tobacco have shown that they are widely distributed in the leaves, stems, and roots, and play important roles in the composition of the microbial ecosystem of tobacco. Herein, we analyzed and quantified the endophytic fungi of healthy tobacco leaves at the seedling (SS), resettling growth (RGS), fast-growing (FGS), and maturing (MS) stages at three altitudes [600 (L), 1000 (M), and 1300 m (H)]. We sequenced the ITS region of fungal samples to delimit operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and phylogenetically characterize the communities. The result showed the number of clustering OTUs at SS, RGS, FGS and MS were greater than 170, 245, 140, and 164, respectively. At the phylum level, species in Ascomycota and Basidiomycota had absolute predominance, representing 97.8% and 2.0 % of the total number of species. We also found the number of unique fungi at the RGS and FGS stages were higher than those in the other two stages. -
Fungal Allergy and Pathogenicity 20130415 112934.Pdf
Fungal Allergy and Pathogenicity Chemical Immunology Vol. 81 Series Editors Luciano Adorini, Milan Ken-ichi Arai, Tokyo Claudia Berek, Berlin Anne-Marie Schmitt-Verhulst, Marseille Basel · Freiburg · Paris · London · New York · New Delhi · Bangkok · Singapore · Tokyo · Sydney Fungal Allergy and Pathogenicity Volume Editors Michael Breitenbach, Salzburg Reto Crameri, Davos Samuel B. Lehrer, New Orleans, La. 48 figures, 11 in color and 22 tables, 2002 Basel · Freiburg · Paris · London · New York · New Delhi · Bangkok · Singapore · Tokyo · Sydney Chemical Immunology Formerly published as ‘Progress in Allergy’ (Founded 1939) Edited by Paul Kallos 1939–1988, Byron H. Waksman 1962–2002 Michael Breitenbach Professor, Department of Genetics and General Biology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg Reto Crameri Professor, Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF), Davos Samuel B. Lehrer Professor, Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA Bibliographic Indices. This publication is listed in bibliographic services, including Current Contents® and Index Medicus. Drug Dosage. The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any change in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopy- ing, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. -
Supplementary Table S1 18Jan 2021
Supplementary Table S1. Accurate scientific names of plant pathogenic fungi and secondary barcodes. Below is a list of the most important plant pathogenic fungi including Oomycetes with their accurate scientific names and synonyms. These scientific names include the results of the change to one scientific name for fungi. For additional information including plant hosts and localities worldwide as well as references consult the USDA-ARS U.S. National Fungus Collections (http://nt.ars- grin.gov/fungaldatabases/). Secondary barcodes, where available, are listed in superscript between round parentheses after generic names. The secondary barcodes listed here do not represent all known available loci for a given genus. Always consult recent literature for which primers and loci are required to resolve your species of interest. Also keep in mind that not all barcodes are available for all species of a genus and that not all species/genera listed below are known from sequence data. GENERA AND SPECIES NAME AND SYNONYMYS DISEASE SECONDARY BARCODES1 Kingdom Fungi Ascomycota Dothideomycetes Asterinales Asterinaceae Thyrinula(CHS-1, TEF1, TUB2) Thyrinula eucalypti (Cooke & Massee) H.J. Swart 1988 Target spot or corky spot of Eucalyptus Leptostromella eucalypti Cooke & Massee 1891 Thyrinula eucalyptina Petr. & Syd. 1924 Target spot or corky spot of Eucalyptus Lembosiopsis eucalyptina Petr. & Syd. 1924 Aulographum eucalypti Cooke & Massee 1889 Aulographina eucalypti (Cooke & Massee) Arx & E. Müll. 1960 Lembosiopsis australiensis Hansf. 1954 Botryosphaeriales Botryosphaeriaceae Botryosphaeria(TEF1, TUB2) Botryosphaeria dothidea (Moug.) Ces. & De Not. 1863 Canker, stem blight, dieback, fruit rot on Fusicoccum Sphaeria dothidea Moug. 1823 diverse hosts Fusicoccum aesculi Corda 1829 Phyllosticta divergens Sacc. 1891 Sphaeria coronillae Desm. -
Australia Biodiversity of Biodiversity Taxonomy and and Taxonomy Plant Pathogenic Fungi Fungi Plant Pathogenic
Taxonomy and biodiversity of plant pathogenic fungi from Australia Yu Pei Tan 2019 Tan Pei Yu Australia and biodiversity of plant pathogenic fungi from Taxonomy Taxonomy and biodiversity of plant pathogenic fungi from Australia Australia Bipolaris Botryosphaeriaceae Yu Pei Tan Curvularia Diaporthe Taxonomy and biodiversity of plant pathogenic fungi from Australia Yu Pei Tan Yu Pei Tan Taxonomy and biodiversity of plant pathogenic fungi from Australia PhD thesis, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands (2019) ISBN: 978-90-393-7126-8 Cover and invitation design: Ms Manon Verweij and Ms Yu Pei Tan Layout and design: Ms Manon Verweij Printing: Gildeprint The research described in this thesis was conducted at the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Ecosciences Precinct, 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park, Queensland, 4102, Australia. Copyright © 2019 by Yu Pei Tan ([email protected]) All rights reserved. No parts of this thesis may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any other forms by any means, without the permission of the author, or when appropriate of the publisher of the represented published articles. Front and back cover: Spatial records of Bipolaris, Curvularia, Diaporthe and Botryosphaeriaceae across the continent of Australia, sourced from the Atlas of Living Australia (http://www.ala. org.au). Accessed 12 March 2019. Taxonomy and biodiversity of plant pathogenic fungi from Australia Taxonomie en biodiversiteit van plantpathogene schimmels van Australië (met een samenvatting in het Nederlands) Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Utrecht op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof. dr. H.R.B.M. Kummeling, ingevolge het besluit van het college voor promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op donderdag 9 mei 2019 des ochtends te 10.30 uur door Yu Pei Tan geboren op 16 december 1980 te Singapore, Singapore Promotor: Prof. -
EU Project Number 613678
EU project number 613678 Strategies to develop effective, innovative and practical approaches to protect major European fruit crops from pests and pathogens Work package 1. Pathways of introduction of fruit pests and pathogens Deliverable 1.3. PART 7 - REPORT on Oranges and Mandarins – Fruit pathway and Alert List Partners involved: EPPO (Grousset F, Petter F, Suffert M) and JKI (Steffen K, Wilstermann A, Schrader G). This document should be cited as ‘Grousset F, Wistermann A, Steffen K, Petter F, Schrader G, Suffert M (2016) DROPSA Deliverable 1.3 Report for Oranges and Mandarins – Fruit pathway and Alert List’. An Excel file containing supporting information is available at https://upload.eppo.int/download/112o3f5b0c014 DROPSA is funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration (grant agreement no. 613678). www.dropsaproject.eu [email protected] DROPSA DELIVERABLE REPORT on ORANGES AND MANDARINS – Fruit pathway and Alert List 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Background on oranges and mandarins ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Data on production and trade of orange and mandarin fruit ........................................................................ 5 1.3 Characteristics of the pathway ‘orange and mandarin fruit’ ....................................................................... -
SAUNDERS an Imprint of Elsevier Science 11830 Westline Industrial
SAUNDERS An Imprint of Elsevier Science 11830 Westline Industrial Drive St. Louis, Missouri 63146 EQUINE DERMATOLOGY ISBN 0-7216-2571-1 Copyright © 2003, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Health Sciences Rights Department in Philadelphia, PA, USA: phone: (+1) 215 238 7869, fax: (+1) 215 238 2239, e- mail: [email protected]. You may also complete your request on-line via the Elsevier Science homepage (http://www.elsevier.com), by selecting ‘Customer Support’ and then ‘Obtaining Permissions’. NOTICE Veterinary Medicine is an ever-changing field. Standard safety precautions must be followed, but as new research and clinical experience broaden our knowledge, changes in treatment and drug therapy may become necessary or appropriate. Readers are advised to check the most current product information provided by the manufacturer of each drug to be administered to verify the recommended dose, the method and duration of administration, and contraindications. It is the responsibility of the treating veterinarian, relying on experience and knowledge of the patient, to determine dosages and the best treatment for each individual animal. Neither the publisher nor the editor assumes any liability for any injury and/or damage to animals or property arising from this publication. International Standard Book Number 0-7216-2571-1 Acquisitions Editor: Ray Kersey Developmental Editor: Denise LeMelledo Publishing Services Manager: Linda McKinley Project Manager: Jennifer Furey Designer: Julia Dummitt Cover Design: Sheilah Barrett Printed in United States of America Last digit is the print number: 987654321 W2571-FM.qxd 2/1/03 11:46 AM Page v Preface and Acknowledgments quine skin disorders are common and important. -
A Worldwide List of Endophytic Fungi with Notes on Ecology and Diversity
Mycosphere 10(1): 798–1079 (2019) www.mycosphere.org ISSN 2077 7019 Article Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/10/1/19 A worldwide list of endophytic fungi with notes on ecology and diversity Rashmi M, Kushveer JS and Sarma VV* Fungal Biotechnology Lab, Department of Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Pondicherry University, Kalapet, Pondicherry 605014, Puducherry, India Rashmi M, Kushveer JS, Sarma VV 2019 – A worldwide list of endophytic fungi with notes on ecology and diversity. Mycosphere 10(1), 798–1079, Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/10/1/19 Abstract Endophytic fungi are symptomless internal inhabits of plant tissues. They are implicated in the production of antibiotic and other compounds of therapeutic importance. Ecologically they provide several benefits to plants, including protection from plant pathogens. There have been numerous studies on the biodiversity and ecology of endophytic fungi. Some taxa dominate and occur frequently when compared to others due to adaptations or capabilities to produce different primary and secondary metabolites. It is therefore of interest to examine different fungal species and major taxonomic groups to which these fungi belong for bioactive compound production. In the present paper a list of endophytes based on the available literature is reported. More than 800 genera have been reported worldwide. Dominant genera are Alternaria, Aspergillus, Colletotrichum, Fusarium, Penicillium, and Phoma. Most endophyte studies have been on angiosperms followed by gymnosperms. Among the different substrates, leaf endophytes have been studied and analyzed in more detail when compared to other parts. Most investigations are from Asian countries such as China, India, European countries such as Germany, Spain and the UK in addition to major contributions from Brazil and the USA. -
Fungal Pathogens of Proteaceae
Persoonia 27, 2011: 20–45 www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/pimj RESEARCH ARTICLE http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/003158511X606239 Fungal pathogens of Proteaceae P.W. Crous 1,3,8, B.A. Summerell 2, L. Swart 3, S. Denman 4, J.E. Taylor 5, C.M. Bezuidenhout 6, M.E. Palm7, S. Marincowitz 8, J.Z. Groenewald1 Key words Abstract Species of Leucadendron, Leucospermum and Protea (Proteaceae) are in high demand for the interna- tional floriculture market due to their brightly coloured and textured flowers or bracts. Fungal pathogens, however, biodiversity create a serious problem in cultivating flawless blooms. The aim of the present study was to characterise several cut-flower industry of these pathogens using morphology, culture characteristics, and DNA sequence data of the rRNA-ITS and LSU fungal pathogens genes. In some cases additional genes such as TEF 1- and CHS were also sequenced. Based on the results of ITS α this study, several novel species and genera are described. Brunneosphaerella leaf blight is shown to be caused by LSU three species, namely B. jonkershoekensis on Protea repens, B. nitidae sp. nov. on Protea nitida and B. protearum phylogeny on a wide host range of Protea spp. (South Africa). Coniothyrium-like species associated with Coniothyrium leaf systematics spot are allocated to other genera, namely Curreya grandicipis on Protea grandiceps, and Microsphaeropsis proteae on P. nitida (South Africa). Diaporthe leucospermi is described on Leucospermum sp. (Australia), and Diplodina microsperma newly reported on Protea sp. (New Zealand). Pyrenophora blight is caused by a novel species, Pyrenophora leucospermi, and not Drechslera biseptata or D. -
Plant Host and Drought Shape the Root Associated Fungal Microbiota in Rice
Plant host and drought shape the root associated fungal microbiota in rice Beatriz Andreo-Jimenez1,2, Philippe Vandenkoornhuyse3, Amandine Lê Van3, Arvid Heutinck1, Marie Duhamel3,4, Niteen Kadam5, Krishna Jagadish5,6, Carolien Ruyter-Spira1 and Harro Bouwmeester1,7 1 Laboratory of Plant Physiology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands 2 Biointeractions & Plant Health Business Unit, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands 3 EcoBio, Université Rennes I, Rennes, France 4 IBL Plant Sciences and Natural Products, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands 5 International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines 6 Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States of America 7 Plant Hormone Biology group, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands ABSTRACT Background and Aim. Water is an increasingly scarce resource while some crops, such as paddy rice, require large amounts of water to maintain grain production. A better understanding of rice drought adaptation and tolerance mechanisms could help to reduce this problem. There is evidence of a possible role of root-associated fungi in drought adaptation. Here, we analyzed the endospheric fungal microbiota composition in rice and its relation to plant genotype and drought. Methods. Fifteen rice genotypes (Oryza sativa ssp. indica) were grown in the field, under well-watered conditions or exposed to a drought period during flowering. The effect of genotype and treatment on the root fungal microbiota composition was analyzed by 18S ribosomal DNA high throughput sequencing. Grain yield was determined after plant maturation. Results. There was a host genotype effect on the fungal community composition. Drought altered the composition of the root-associated fungal community and Submitted 12 November 2018 increased fungal biodiversity. -
Genera of Phytopathogenic Fungi: GOPHY 1
Accepted Manuscript Genera of phytopathogenic fungi: GOPHY 1 Y. Marin-Felix, J.Z. Groenewald, L. Cai, Q. Chen, S. Marincowitz, I. Barnes, K. Bensch, U. Braun, E. Camporesi, U. Damm, Z.W. de Beer, A. Dissanayake, J. Edwards, A. Giraldo, M. Hernández-Restrepo, K.D. Hyde, R.S. Jayawardena, L. Lombard, J. Luangsa-ard, A.R. McTaggart, A.Y. Rossman, M. Sandoval-Denis, M. Shen, R.G. Shivas, Y.P. Tan, E.J. van der Linde, M.J. Wingfield, A.R. Wood, J.Q. Zhang, Y. Zhang, P.W. Crous PII: S0166-0616(17)30020-9 DOI: 10.1016/j.simyco.2017.04.002 Reference: SIMYCO 47 To appear in: Studies in Mycology Please cite this article as: Marin-Felix Y, Groenewald JZ, Cai L, Chen Q, Marincowitz S, Barnes I, Bensch K, Braun U, Camporesi E, Damm U, de Beer ZW, Dissanayake A, Edwards J, Giraldo A, Hernández-Restrepo M, Hyde KD, Jayawardena RS, Lombard L, Luangsa-ard J, McTaggart AR, Rossman AY, Sandoval-Denis M, Shen M, Shivas RG, Tan YP, van der Linde EJ, Wingfield MJ, Wood AR, Zhang JQ, Zhang Y, Crous PW, Genera of phytopathogenic fungi: GOPHY 1, Studies in Mycology (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2017.04.002. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. -
Pdf Transporter Genes Are Contemporaneously Present in Mycorrhiza: an Ancient Symbiosis in Modern
Lectures 19 and 20: Mycorrhizas – Reading: Text, Chapter 17. ALSO great website from CSIRO in Austalia http://www.ffp.csiro.au/research/mycorrhiza/index.html http://mycorrhizas.info/index.html Rodriguez R and Redman R. 2008. More than 400 years of evolution and some plants still canʼt make it on their own. Journal of Experimental Botany 59: 1109-1114. Parniske M. 2008. Arbuscular mycorrhiza: the mother of plant root endosymbioses. Nature Reviews Microbiology 6: 763-773. Stinson, K.A. et al. 2006. Invasive plant suppresses the growth of native tree seedlings by disrupting belowground mutualisms. PLOS Biology Objectives: Understand the importance of mycorrhizas. Know how to recognize ectomycorrhizas, and the types of endomycorrhizas. Know how to prove that a mycorrhizal symbiosis has been formed (differentiating between what you expect with ecto- vs. endomycorrhizas). Know which groups of fungi (phyla, orders, families) form ectomycorrhizas, which form endomycorrhizas. Keywords: ectomycorrhiza, mantle, Hartig net, endomycorrhiza, vesicle, arbuscule, spore, Glomeromycota. Study questions: 1) What are the soil and root-associated structures found with VAM? With orchid mycorrhizas? Compare and contrast the structures of VAM, orchid mycorrhizas, and ECMs. Which fungal phyla form each of the three types of mycorrhizas that we have discussed? 2) Are VAM common in plant roots? Explain. 3) VAM appears to be a balanced mutualism – is this true? 4) You wish to prove that Russula mississaugii is a mycorrhizal fungus. How could you convince our class? Use your naked eye, a dissecting microscope, a compound microscope, and radio-isotope study of tree seedlings to prove your point! What are the controls? 5) What are the benefits to the plant and to the ecosystem of mycorrhizas? 6) Why do plant species that depend on mycorrhizas tend to lack root hairs? 7) Garlic mustard is very common around Mississauga and on this campus.