Hindu Human Rights Report 2019 Covers Violations of Human Rights of Hindus in India

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hindu Human Rights Report 2019 Covers Violations of Human Rights of Hindus in India ABSTRACT The Hindu Human Rights Report 2019 covers violations of human rights of Hindus in India. Human rights of Hindus in India continued to deteriorate with State-sponsored discrimination and continued attacks on Hindus and their places of worship. HINDU HUMAN Subhodeep Mukhopadhyay Sankrant Sanu Nithin Sridhar RIGHTS REPORT 2019 IndiaFacts Research Group Hindu Human Rights Report © 2016-2019 IndiaFacts Research Group Contact: Twitter: @IndiaFactsOrg, @sankrant @nkgrock Email: [email protected] About IndiaFacts Research Center IndiaFacts has established itself as a platform for serious enquiry and discussion on dharma, comparative religion, cross-civilizational issues, Indology, and India-related topics. It aims to provide a fact-based counter to the mainstream media narrative about India. 1 Hindu Human Rights Report 2019 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 India’s Neighbourhood ............................................................................................................... 6 2 Legalized Discrimination by all Branches of Government .................................................................... 9 2.1 Government Confiscation and Looting of Hindu Temples .......................................................... 9 2.2 Education Sector: No Level Playing Field and Government Confiscation ................................. 10 2.3 Discriminatory Government Schemes ...................................................................................... 11 2.3.1 Central & State Government Schemes which Exclude Hindus ............................................. 12 2.3.1.1 Central Government .................................................................................................... 13 2.3.1.2 Bihar ............................................................................................................................ 17 2.3.1.3 Gujarat ......................................................................................................................... 18 2.3.1.4 Himachal Pradesh ........................................................................................................ 18 2.3.1.5 Karnataka ..................................................................................................................... 18 2.3.1.6 Kerala ........................................................................................................................... 19 2.3.1.7 Tamil Nadu .................................................................................................................. 20 2.3.1.8 Telangana .................................................................................................................... 20 2.3.1.9 Uttar Pradesh .............................................................................................................. 21 2.3.1.10 West Bengal ................................................................................................................. 21 2.3.2 Observations ........................................................................................................................ 22 2.4 Interference of Judiciary in Hindu Traditions and Freedom to Practice ................................... 23 2.4.1 Sabarimala Verdict ............................................................................................................... 23 2.4.2 Diwali Firecracker Ban .......................................................................................................... 24 2.4.3 Jallikattu Ban ........................................................................................................................ 24 2.4.4 Dahi Handi Restrictions ........................................................................................................ 24 3 Persecution of Hindus by Dominant or Ruling Ideologies .................................................................. 26 3.1 Dravidian Extremism ................................................................................................................ 26 3.2 Communist Extremism: Kill with Impunity ............................................................................... 28 3.3 Islamo-Socialist Misrule in Uttar Pradesh: Impunities Galore .................................................. 29 3.4 Christian Extremism .................................................................................................................. 30 3.5 Jammu & Kashmir: No one Committed Pandit Genocide ......................................................... 31 3.6 Terrorism .................................................................................................................................. 33 2 4 Incident Reports ................................................................................................................................. 35 4.1 Love Jihad, Violence against Women and Rape ....................................................................... 36 4.1.1 Key Findings ......................................................................................................................... 36 4.1.2 Incident Reports ................................................................................................................... 38 4.2 Islamic Attacks & Communal Clashes ....................................................................................... 53 4.2.1 Key Findings ......................................................................................................................... 53 4.2.2 Incident Reports ................................................................................................................... 53 4.3 Attacks on Hindu Festivals and Places of Worship ................................................................... 59 4.3.1 Key Findings ......................................................................................................................... 59 4.3.2 Incident Reports ................................................................................................................... 59 4.4 Political Violence and Killing of Hindus ..................................................................................... 64 4.4.1 Key Findings ......................................................................................................................... 64 4.4.2 Incident Reports ................................................................................................................... 64 4.5 Religious Persecution ............................................................................................................... 70 4.5.1 Key Findings ......................................................................................................................... 70 4.5.2 Incident Reports ................................................................................................................... 70 4.6 Dalit Persecution by Muslims ................................................................................................... 76 4.6.1 Key Findings ......................................................................................................................... 76 4.6.2 Incident Reports ................................................................................................................... 77 5 IndiaFacts Policy Recommendations ................................................................................................. 81 5.1 Eliminate Constitutional Loophole ........................................................................................... 81 5.2 Other Changes .......................................................................................................................... 81 5.3 Hindu Charter—A Plea for Equality .......................................................................................... 82 6 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................ 87 7 References and Notes ........................................................................................................................ 88 3 1 Introduction There is no dearth of Human Rights Reports tackles crimes against majority Whites and being produced on India like the USCIRF major Christian denominations.4 Similarly, report1, Amnesty International Report or the official hate crime statistics for England Human Rights Watch2 report. USCIRF and Wales, include majority Whites and produces a section on India. The US State Christians5. In contrast, reports on Human department has its own reports, compiled by Rights in India omit hate crimes against organizations such as the Amnesty and Hindus altogether or focus exclusively on Human Rights Watch. However, all these “lower castes” or “minorities.” reports have one significant omission. They India has a long history of human rights focus exclusively on human rights of non- violations, persecution and subjugation of Hindus, with the exception of ‘dalits’. Hindus. Major parts of India were rule be This excludes a large percentage of the centuries by Muslims and Christians who human rights violations on the mistaken were the dominant powers. Moreover, the assumption that rights violations in India can presumed ‘majority religion’ in India i.e. only take place by the ‘majority’ on the Hinduism, is not a monotheistic doctrinal
Recommended publications
  • The Epic Imagination in Contemporary Indian Literature
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School May 2017 Modern Mythologies: The picE Imagination in Contemporary Indian Literature Sucheta Kanjilal University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the South and Southeast Asian Languages and Societies Commons Scholar Commons Citation Kanjilal, Sucheta, "Modern Mythologies: The pE ic Imagination in Contemporary Indian Literature" (2017). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/6875 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Modern Mythologies: The Epic Imagination in Contemporary Indian Literature by Sucheta Kanjilal A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy with a concentration in Literature Department of English College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Gurleen Grewal, Ph.D. Gil Ben-Herut, Ph.D. Hunt Hawkins, Ph.D. Quynh Nhu Le, Ph.D. Date of Approval: May 4, 2017 Keywords: South Asian Literature, Epic, Gender, Hinduism Copyright © 2017, Sucheta Kanjilal DEDICATION To my mother: for pencils, erasers, and courage. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS When I was growing up in New Delhi, India in the late 1980s and the early 1990s, my father was writing an English language rock-opera based on the Mahabharata called Jaya, which would be staged in 1997. An upper-middle-class Bengali Brahmin with an English-language based education, my father was as influenced by the mythological tales narrated to him by his grandmother as he was by the musicals of Broadway impressario Andrew Lloyd Webber.
    [Show full text]
  • Spiritual and Material Development the Politics of Islamic Charitable Action in North India
    Spiritual and Material Development The politics of Islamic charitable action in North India Catherine Larouche Department of Anthropology McGill University Montreal, Quebec, Canada October 29, 2017 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy © Catherine Larouche, 2017 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................................... v RÉSUMÉ ................................................................................................................................................................... vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................................... vii NOTE ON TRANSLATION AND TRANSLITERATION ............................................................................... x ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................................................. xi Chapter One. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 A disadvantaged minority ............................................................................................................................. 1 Muslim charitable organizations ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Qt7vk4k1r0 Nosplash 9Eebe15
    Fiction Beyond Secularism 8flashpoints The FlashPoints series is devoted to books that consider literature beyond strictly national and disciplinary frameworks, and that are distinguished both by their historical grounding and by their theoretical and conceptual strength. Our books engage theory without losing touch with history and work historically without falling into uncritical positivism. FlashPoints aims for a broad audience within the humanities and the social sciences concerned with moments of cultural emergence and transformation. In a Benjaminian mode, FlashPoints is interested in how literature contributes to forming new constellations of culture and history and in how such formations function critically and politically in the present. Series titles are available online at http://escholarship.org/uc/flashpoints. series editors: Ali Behdad (Comparative Literature and English, UCLA), Founding Editor; Judith Butler (Rhetoric and Comparative Literature, UC Berkeley), Founding Editor; Michelle Clayton (Hispanic Studies and Comparative Literature, Brown University); Edward Dimendberg (Film and Media Studies, Visual Studies, and European Languages and Studies, UC Irvine), Coordinator; Catherine Gallagher (English, UC Berkeley), Founding Editor; Nouri Gana (Comparative Literature and Near Eastern Languages and Cultures, UCLA); Jody Greene (Literature, UC Santa Cruz); Susan Gillman (Literature, UC Santa Cruz); Richard Terdiman (Literature, UC Santa Cruz) 1. On Pain of Speech: Fantasies of the First Order and the Literary Rant, Dina Al-Kassim 2. Moses and Multiculturalism, Barbara Johnson, with a foreword by Barbara Rietveld 3. The Cosmic Time of Empire: Modern Britain and World Literature, Adam Barrows 4. Poetry in Pieces: César Vallejo and Lyric Modernity, Michelle Clayton 5. Disarming Words: Empire and the Seductions of Translation in Egypt, Shaden M.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Muslim Hatred and Discrimination Submission from Dia Kayyali Associate Director of Advocacy at Mnemonic, Independent Consul
    Anti-Muslim Hatred and Discrimination Submission from Dia Kayyali Associate Director of Advocacy at Mnemonic, independent consultant on technology and human rights, and co-chair of the Christchurch Call Advisory Network1 [email protected] Summary: This submission focuses on the online aspect of anti-Muslim hatred and discrimination (Islamophobia). Content that incites violence against Muslims is too often left up on major social media platforms, while important content produced by Muslims is often removed. This leads to diminishing opportunities for justice in conflict zones such as Syria, while facilitating increased violence against Muslim communities around the world. Furthermore, online content is never solely online. Rather, it is intimately linked to violence and discrimination against Muslims in a harmful feedback loop. How the online feeds into the offline and back again, creating a vicious cycle The online component of Islamophobia has deadly consequences for Muslims around the world. At the same time, predominantly Muslim communities see content they post online regularly removed by major social media companies. Islamophobia, like other social ills, is stuck in a dangerous feedback loop. Offline discrimination and violence lead to online hate speech and dangerous speech. This content then worsens discrimination, and sometimes directly incites offline violence and other negative consequences. The cycle is self-perpetuating, and it is deadly. Muslim lives have already been lost as a result, and Islamophobia threatens other essential human rights including freedoms of expression and religion. Who is Muslim? Islamophobia doesn’t just impact Muslims. As outlined in this submission, it also impacts people who are secular or practice other religions but are in Muslim majority countries or communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Secrets of RSS
    Secrets of RSS DEMYSTIFYING THE SANGH (The Largest Indian NGO in the World) by Ratan Sharda © Ratan Sharda E-book of second edition released May, 2015 Ratan Sharda, Mumbai, India Email:[email protected]; [email protected] License Notes This ebook is licensed for your personal enjoyment only. This ebook may not be re-soldor given away to other people. If you would like to share this book with another person,please purchase an additional copy for each recipient. If you’re reading this book and didnot purchase it, or it was not purchased for your use only, then please return to yourfavorite ebook retailer and purchase your own copy. Thank you for respecting the hardwork of this author. About the Book Narendra Modi, the present Prime Minister of India, is a true blue RSS (Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh or National Volunteers Organization) swayamsevak or volunteer. More importantly, he is a product of prachaarak system, a unique institution of RSS. More than his election campaigns, his conduct after becoming the Prime Minister really tells us how a responsible RSS worker and prachaarak responds to any responsibility he is entrusted with. His rise is also illustrative example of submission by author in this book that RSS has been able to design a system that can create ‘extraordinary achievers out of ordinary people’. When the first edition of Secrets of RSS was released, air was thick with motivated propaganda about ‘Saffron terror’ and RSS was the favourite whipping boy as the face of ‘Hindu fascism’. Now as the second edition is ready for release, environment has transformed radically.
    [Show full text]
  • Compounding Injustice: India
    INDIA 350 Fifth Ave 34 th Floor New York, N.Y. 10118-3299 http://www.hrw.org (212) 290-4700 Vol. 15, No. 3 (C) – July 2003 Afsara, a Muslim woman in her forties, clutches a photo of family members killed in the February-March 2002 communal violence in Gujarat. Five of her close family members were murdered, including her daughter. Afsara’s two remaining children survived but suffered serious burn injuries. Afsara filed a complaint with the police but believes that the police released those that she identified, along with many others. Like thousands of others in Gujarat she has little faith in getting justice and has few resources with which to rebuild her life. ©2003 Smita Narula/Human Rights Watch COMPOUNDING INJUSTICE: THE GOVERNMENT’S FAILURE TO REDRESS MASSACRES IN GUJARAT 1630 Connecticut Ave, N.W., Suite 500 2nd Floor, 2-12 Pentonville Road 15 Rue Van Campenhout Washington, DC 20009 London N1 9HF, UK 1000 Brussels, Belgium TEL (202) 612-4321 TEL: (44 20) 7713 1995 TEL (32 2) 732-2009 FAX (202) 612-4333 FAX: (44 20) 7713 1800 FAX (32 2) 732-0471 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] July 2003 Vol. 15, No. 3 (C) COMPOUNDING INJUSTICE: The Government's Failure to Redress Massacres in Gujarat Table of Contents I. Summary............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Impunity for Attacks Against Muslims...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report 2021, No. 6
    News Agency on Conservative Europe Report 2021, No. 6. Report on conservative and right wing Europe 20th March, 2021 GERMANY 1. jungefreiheit.de (translated, original by jungefreiheit.de, 18.03.2021) "New German media makers" Migrant organization calls for more “diversity” among journalists media BERLIN. The migrant organization “New German Media Makers” (NdM) has reiterated its demand that editorial offices should become “more diverse”. To this end, the association presented a “Diversity Guide” on Wednesday under the title “How German Media Create More Diversity”. According to excerpts on the NdM website, it says, among other things: “German society has changed, it has become more colorful. That should be reflected in the reporting. ”The manual explains which terms journalists should and should not use in which context. 2 When reporting on criminal offenses, “the prejudice still prevails that refugees or people with an international history are more likely to commit criminal offenses than biographically Germans and that their origin is causally related to it”. Collect "diversity data" and introduce "soft quotas" Especially now, when the media are losing sales, there is a crisis of confidence and more competition, “diversity” is important. "More diversity brings new target groups, new customers and, above all, better, more successful journalism." The more “diverse” editorial offices are, the more it is possible “to take up issues of society without prejudice”, the published excerpts continue to say. “And just as we can no longer imagine a purely male editorial office today, we should also no longer be able to imagine white editorial offices. Precisely because of the special constitutional mandate of the media, the question of fair access and the representation of all population groups in journalism is also a question of democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Handbook West Bengal 2011
    STATISTICAL HANDBOOK WEST BENGAL 2011 BUREAU OF APPLIED ECONOMICS & STATISTICS GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL PREFACE Statistical Handbook, West Bengal provides information on salient features of various socio-economic aspects of the State. The present issue is the fortj-fourth edition in the series. The data furnished in its previous issue have been updated to the extent possible so that continuity in time-series data can be maintained. I would like to thank various State & Central Govt. Departments and organisations for active co-operation received from their end in timely supply of required information. The officers and staff of the Reference Technical Section of the Bureau also deserve my thanks for their sincere effort in bringing out this pubhcation. It is hoped that this issue would be useful to planners, pohcy makers and researchers. Suggestions for improvement of this pubhcation are most welcome. Dipankar Chattopadhyay New Secretariat Director, Buildings, Kolkata, Bureau of Applied Economics & Statistics, 31st December, 2012. Government of West Bengal. SYMBOLS - The following symbols have been used in this publication .. Not available - Negligible or nil p Provisional 1 Incomplete incoverage R Revised Conversion Table The Metric System 1 Standard of weights Grain = 0.065 Gram Ounce = 28.350 Grams Pound = 0.4535924 Kilogram Cwt = 50.802 Kilograms Ton = 1016.05 Kilograms = 1.01605 Tonnes Tola = 11.664 Grams Chattak = 58.32 Grams Seer = 0.93310 Kilogram Maund = 37.3242 Kilograms 100 Kilograms = 1 Quintal 10 Quintals = 1 Tonne II Standard of length and capacity Foot = 0.3048 Metre Inch = 0.0254 Metre Yard = 0.9144 Metre Mile = 1.609344 Kilometres Imperial gallon = 4.54596 Litres III Standard of area 1 Acre = 0.404686 Hectare 1 Sq.
    [Show full text]
  • So Many People Are Perplexed with the Covid-19 Lockdowns, Mask Requirements, Social Distancing, Loss of Jobs, Homes, and Their Very Sanity
    So many people are perplexed with the Covid-19 lockdowns, mask requirements, social distancing, loss of jobs, homes, and their very sanity. What lies behind all of this? There have been so many conflicting reports that one has to ask the question, Is there even a pandemic at all? Was there ever one? Let’s have a look. ======================== Strange advance hints (predictive programming) – A 1993 Simpsons episode called “Marge in Chains” actually accurately predicted the coronavirus outbreak. One scene depicted a boardroom meeting between government officials and major media moguls. The chairman opened with these words: “I’d like to call to order this secret conclave of America’s media empires. We are here to come up with the next phony baloney crisis to put Americans back where they belong…” Suddenly a delegate from NBC chimed in: “Well I think…” Then the chairman interrupted him, saying: “NBC, you are here to listen and not speak!” He then said: “I think we should go with a good old fashioned health scare.” Everyone then nodded in approval. Next, a female delegate remarked: “A new disease–no one’s immune–it’s like The Summer of the Shark, except instead of the shark, it’s an epidemic.” – Another Simpsons episode called “A Totally Fun Thing that Bart will Never Do Again,” first aired on April 29, 2012, featured an emergency broadcast announcing the outbreak of the deadly “Pandora Virus,” and how it was “spreading rapidly.” The announcer then said: “This unprecedented threat requires a world-wide quarantine. All ships must remain at sea until further notice.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Impact Assessment Report for the Koderma -Jamuabypass Road in the District Koderma
    SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR THE KODERMA -JAMUABYPASS ROAD IN THE DISTRICT KODERMA SUBMITTED TO DISTRICT COLLECTOR KODERMA SUPPORT HAZARIBAG SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ………………….KODERMA JAMUA BYPASS ROAD Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ 5 LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................... 5 LIST OF ABBRIVIATIONS ............................................................................................................ 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. 7 1. PROJECT LOCATION AND PUBLIC PURPOSE ................................................................. 7 2. SIZE AND ATTRIBUTION OF LAND ACQUISITION ............................................................. 8 3. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ............................................................................................ 8 4. SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT .......................................................................................... 9 5. Nature, Present Use and Classification of Land ........................................................... 9 6. Structures on the Land Proposed to be acquired ....................................................... 9 7. Directly Affected ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ayodhya Verdict - UPSC Notes Context
    Ayodhya Verdict - UPSC Notes Context The Supreme Court delivered a landmark judgment in the Ayodhya land dispute case. The five-judge Supreme Court bench led by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi read out a unanimous judgment and ruled in favour of the Ram Janmabhoomi and said there will be a Ram Mandir at the disputed site and Muslims will be given an alternate 5 acre land for their mosque. What is the crux of the dispute? At the crux of the matter is the belief among sections of Hindus that the Babri Masjid, named after Mughal emperor Babur, was built in Ayodhya after destroying a Ram Temple that marked the birthplace of the deity. The Hindu parties wanted the land to themselves, contending that Lord Ram was born at a spot on which later the central dome of the mosque was built. The Muslim parties, however, contended that the mosque was constructed in 1528 by Mir Baqi, a commander of Babur’s army, without demolishing any place of worship and since the land rights had not been transferred to any other party, the space was rightfully theirs. Chronology of the Ayodhya dispute 1528: First Mughal Emperor Babar is believed to have constructed Babri Masjid. The three-domed mosque built by Mir Baqi, commander of Mughal emperor Babur, in 1528 is in the Jaunpuri style. 1885: Mahant Raghbir Das moves Faizabad court seeking permission to construct a temple in the vicinity of the Babri Masjid. The plea is declined. 1949: Idols of Lord Ram were mysteriously found inside the mosque. The Muslim side claimed it was the handiwork of the Hindus, while the Hindus wanted to worship the idol.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Riots and Electoral Politics in India
    IZA DP No. 9522 Religious Riots and Electoral Politics in India Sriya Iyer Anand Shrivastava November 2015 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor Religious Riots and Electoral Politics in India Sriya Iyer University of Cambridge and IZA Anand Shrivastava University of Cambridge Discussion Paper No. 9522 November 2015 IZA P.O. Box 7240 53072 Bonn Germany Phone: +49-228-3894-0 Fax: +49-228-3894-180 E-mail: [email protected] Any opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but the institute itself takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post Foundation. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author.
    [Show full text]