DOCSLIB.ORG

Wild Rivers Policy –

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wild Rivers Policy – Wild Rivers Policy – Likely impact on sustainable development Authored by Dr Joanne Copp September 2010 On behalf of the Social Responsibilities Committee, Anglican Diocese of Brisbane Contents ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................................... II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ IV 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................. 2 1.2 OUTLINE OF REPORT ..................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 WILD RIVER DECLARATIONS TO DATE ........................................................................................... 5 2 WHAT LEVEL OF USE IS “SUSTAINABLE” IN CYP? ............................................................... 6 2.1 CAPE YORK PENINSULA – LOCAL AND REGIONAL DRIVERS ......................................................... 8 2.2 CASE STUDY – BIODIESEL FUEL FROM PONGAMIA (MILLETIA) TREE SEEDS ................................... 16 3 WILD RIVERS LEGISLATION AND WATER RESOURCE PLANNING .................................... 18 4 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS WITHIN CAPE YORK PENINSULA ......................................................................................................................... 23 4.1 LAND TENURE WITHIN CAPE YORK PENINSULA ............................................................................ 23 4.2 OBTAINING DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS .................................................................................... 25 4.2.1 Integrated Development Approval System ........................................................ 25 4.2.3 What is Deemed to be an “Application”? .......................................................... 26 4.3 IMPLEMENTING THE WILD RIVERS ACT ........................................................................................ 27 4.3.1 Wild River Declarations .............................................................................................. 28 4.3.2 Implications for Development ................................................................................. 38 4.3.3 Inconsistencies in the Implementation of the Wild Rivers Act ........................ 43 4.4 IMBALANCE IN ADDRESSING TOWARD Q2 GOALS .................................................................... 46 5 INDIGENOUS VERSUS NON-INDIGENOUS USE ................................................................ 47 6 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................... 48 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................ 50 APPENDIX A – CAPE YORK PENINSULA .................................................................................... 52 APPENDIX B – DECLARED BASINS ............................................................................................. 53 APPENDIX C – ACTIVITIES PROHIBITED OR RESTRICTED WITHIN WILD RIVER AREAS ............. 57 On behalf of the Social Responsibilities Committee, Anglican Diocese of Brisbane Page i ABBREVIATIONS CPMA COASTAL PROTECTION MANAGEMENT ACT CYP CAPE YORK PENINSULA CYPHA CAPE YORK PENINSULA HERITAGE ACT CYPLUS CAPE YORK PENINSULA LAND USE STUDY DA DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL DECC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE DEEDI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION DERM DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEWHA DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT, WATER, HERITAGE AND THE ARTS EIS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT EPA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT ERA ENVIRONMENTALLY RELEVANT ACTIVITY FMA FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT AREA GBRMPA GREAT BARRIER REEF MARINE PARK AUTHORITY HPA HIGH PRESERVATION AREA IDAS INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT SYSTEM IPA INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT IREG INDIGENOUS REGION LG LOCAL GOVERNMENT MCU MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE ML MEGALITRES MT METRIC TONNE NPW NATIONAL PARKS AND WILDLIFE ACT NTA NATIVE TITLE ACT OW OPERATIONAL WORKS SD STATISTICAL DIVISION SDPWOA STATE DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS ORGANISATION ACT On behalf of the Social Responsibilities Committee, Anglican Diocese of Brisbane Page ii SLA STATISTICAL LOCAL AREA SPA SUSTAINABLE PLANNING ACT SRC SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES COMMITTEE SSD STATISTICAL SUBDIVISION VMA VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT WA WATER ACT WRA WILD RIVERS ACT WRP WATER RESOURCE PLAN On behalf of the Social Responsibilities Committee, Anglican Diocese of Brisbane Page iii Anglican Church of Australia EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The State Government has repeatedly claimed that the wild rivers legislation does not impede sustainable development. There are two aspects to the Social Responsibility Committee‘s (SRC) and the affected communities‘ objections to the wild rivers legislation. The first relates to how it has been implemented, namely without consent of Indigenous groups. In doing so, it fails to meet the standards set by the United Nations International Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People to which the Commonwealth Government has given its support and contravenes the Cape York Peninsula Heads of Agreement (signed by the State Government in 1996). The second relates to what the legislation actually does. The overall effect of the many prohibitions and restrictions is that very limited agricultural, urban and industrial development (eg. small scale ―eco-friendly‖ tourism) is allowed within High Preservation Areas (HPAs) and nominated waterways of PAs of wild river areas. This is particularly problematic because these areas (referred to by local residents as ―river land‖) are the most productive and therefore most viable land for those relying upon the land for their income. On both fronts, rights have been violated - both the right to consent by Indigenous groups and the right to derive income from the land by all groups, both Indigenous and non-Indigenous. This paper addresses the second set of rights, by demonstrating how sustainable development is impeded. The Cape York Peninsula Land Use Study undertaken in the late 1990s clearly illustrates enormous productive potential within the Peninsula. In 2005, two Queensland Departments commissioned a project to identify and examine current agricultural and horticultural endeavors and the potential for expanding these industries on CYP in an ecologically and sustainable way. The report states: “…for future horticultural or agricultural enterprises to succeed and maximize returns on investment in the Cape York Region, access to irrigation is critically important to ensure farming viability.” and lack of access to irrigation ―…could make long term survival of smaller enterprises with limited financial reserves a concern.” ―At this early stage it is difficult to predict or speculate what impacts the proposed Wild Rivers Legislation will have on agricultural and pastoral activities on Cape York. … However in the analysis of the region as an existing or future potential farming area, the implementation of this legislation in concert with the Vegetation Management legislation … gives a fair indication that the northern region of Cape York will become an increasingly difficult place to contemplate as an area to create large farming enterprises outside the scope of what currently exists.” Given the gravity of the legislative impact on future new development, the right to development should only be taken from indigenous people through a consent process (i.e. where consent is given we accept that traditional owners have agreed to forego their development opportunities). the right of all peoples to self-determination, including the right to pursue their economic, social and cultural goals, and manage and dispose of their own resources. (Article 1); the right to work defined as the opportunity of everyone to gain their living by freely chosen or accepted work. Parties are required to take ―appropriate steps‖ to safeguard this right, including economic policies aimed at steady economic development and ultimately full employment. (Article 6). The work referred to in Article 6 must be decent work, where this is effectively defined as ―just and favourable‖ working conditions. (Article 7). On behalf of the Social Responsibilities Committee, Anglican Diocese of Brisbane Page iv Anglican Church of Australia This paper argues that the challenge for the region to take advantage of this productive capacity lies in the ability to store the high summer rainfalls for use in the dryer months. Water allocations or water extractions from wild rivers and nominated waterways are strictly limited and regulated. No new dams or weirs are permitted on a wild river or its main tributaries, with operational works for the taking of overland flow water only permitted for stock and domestic purposes. These new off- stream storages are limited in capacity, which affects the scale of activities and consequently viability. This report argues the prohibitions and restrictions imposed by the wild rivers legislation have their underpinnings in the water resource planning (WRP) process. While no public WRP has been undertaken for the Peninsula, those undertaken for earlier declarations within the Gulf point to a flawed methodological
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Visitor Learning Guide
    VISITOR LEARNING GUIDE 1 Produced by The Wilderness Society The Styx Valley of the Giants oers the opportunity to experience one of the world’s most iconic and spectacular forest areas. For decades the Wilderness Society has worked with the broader community to achieve protection for the Styx and we want to share it, and some of its stories, with you. This guide is not meant to be a comprehensive overview of the Styx, Tasmania’s forests or World Heritage. Rather, it is designed to share a cross-section of knowledge through simple stories that follow a common theme on each of the identified walks. With its help, we hope you will learn from this spectacular place, and leave knowing more about our forests, their natural and cultural legacy and some other interesting titbits. The Wilderness Society acknowledges the Tasmanian Aboriginal community as the traditional owners and custodians of all Country in Tasmania and pays respect to Elders past and present. We support eorts to progress reconciliation, land justice and equality. We recognise and welcome actions that seek to better identify, present, protect and conserve Aboriginal cultural heritage, irrespective of where it is located. Cover photo: A giant eucalypt in the Styx Valley, Rob Blakers. © The Wilderness Society, Tasmania 2015. STYX VALLEY OF THE GIANTS - VISITOR LEARNING GUIDE TO ELLENDALE MT FIELD FENTONBURY NATIONAL PARK WESTERWAY B61 TYENNA Tyenna River TO NEW NORFOLK TO LAKE PEDDER & HOBART & STRATHGORDON MAYDENA FOOD & ACCOMMODATION There’s some great accommodation and food options on your way to the Styx. Westerway • Blue Wren Riverside Cottage • Duy’s Country Accommodation Styx River • Platypus Playground Riverside Cottage Styx River .
    [Show full text]
  • West Coast Wilderness
    WEst COast WILDERNESS WAY This route links the three World Heritage START: Cradle Mountain EXPLORE: Tasmania’s West Coast Areas of Cradle Mountain, the wild rivers of DURATION: 3-4 days the Franklin and lower Gordon River and NATIONAL PARKS ON THIS ROUTE: the land and 3,000 lakes that surround > Franklin-Gordon Wild Rivers National Park Lake St Clair. The route starts from Cradle Mountain and explores the unique post- settlement history of the region that includes convicts, miners and railway men and their families. LEG TIME / DISTANCE Cradle Mountain to Zeehan 1 hr 35 min / 106 km Zeehan to Strahan 41 min / 44 km Strahan to Queenstown 37 min / 41 km Queenstown to Lake St Clair (Derwent Bridge) 1 hr / 86 km Cradle Mountain - Zeehan > After enjoying the Cradle Mountain experience make your next stop Tullah, a town with a chequered history of mining and hydro development that now caters to visitors. > Stop for refreshments at Tullah Lakeside Lodge or maybe a bit of fishing on Lake Rosebery. > The town of Rosebery, a short drive farther southwest, is a working mine township proud of its environmental management. Tour the mine’s surface infrastructure. > Nearby is a three-hour return walk to Tasmania’s tallest waterfall, Montezuma Falls. > Continue on to Zeehan, once Tasmania’s third-largest town with gold and silver mines, numerous hotels and more than 10,000 residents. Now it’s at the centre of the west coast’s mining heritage, with the West Coast Heritage Centre, the unusual Spray Tunnel and the Grand Hotel and Gaiety Theatre.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Rivers Policy –
    Wild Rivers Policy – Likely impact on Indigenous Well-Being Authored by Dr Joanne Copp August 2009 On behalf of the Social Responsibilities Committee, Anglican Diocese of Brisbane Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ II 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 1 2 INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES LIVING IN REMOTE AREAS ...................................................... 2 3 WILD RIVERS ..................................................................................................................................... 2 4 PROPERTY RIGHTS FOR REMOTE INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES ............................................ 6 4.1 PROPERTY RIGHTS AND ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY ......................................................................... 9 4.2 APPLICATION TO THE WILD RIVERS ACT .................................................................................... 11 5 THE IMPORTANCE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOR REMOTE INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES ........................................................................................................................................ 13 5.1 ENGAGEMENT WITH THE REAL ECONOMY ................................................................................. 14 6 HAS THE WILD RIVERS ACT STRUCK THE CORRECT BALANCE? .......................................... 15 7 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHANGE ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Island on the Brink – the Betrayal of Norfolk Island's Heritage
    SUPPLEMENTARY SUBMISSION TO WILD RIVERS INQUIRY A) INTRODUCTION – PURPOSE OF SUBMISSION This submission concerns the reference in the Wild Rivers (Environmental Management) Bill 2010 to wild river area declaration and management. As with the preliminary submission it seeks to provide background about these matters so that the Legal and Constitutional Committee has a broad understanding of this subject. The general point made is that this has an Australia-wide history and is a matter of national importance. B) EXPERTISE IN WILD RIVER MATTERS I have had many years of involvement with heritage protection in Australia and overseas including: 1) As Consultant in 1973/74 to the Task Force on the National Estate; 2) As CEO from 1973 to 1986 of the Australian Conservation Foundation; 3) As a Member since 1979 of the World Commission on Protected Areas; 4) As Regional Councillor from 1981 to 1988 representing Australasia and Oceania on the Council of the World Conservation Union. 5) As a private heritage consultant since 1986 providing expertise on heritage matters to a wide range of bodies including the Governments of the Commonwealth, NSW, Victoria and the Northern Territory. One of my reports was Determining the Environmental Conservation Values of New South Wales Rivers (August 1990). C) HISTORY OF RIVER CONSERVATION IN AUSTRALIA While we in Australia have been protecting particular parts of the landscape for their natural values within a few years of white settlement and were responsible for setting aside (at Royal) the world’s first “national park” we were slow to develop a similar approach to the conservation of rivers and streams.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Australia's Rivers, Wetlands and Estuaries
    Protecting Australia’s rivers, wetlands and estuaries “…the river and lagoons abound with fish and fowl…” Explorer John Oxley’s observations of the Lachlan River (Oxley, 1820) “...nowadays the river has lost its charm. It’s no longer a sweet smelling place.” Lance Parker, Hillston commenting on Lachlan River (Roberts and Sainty, 1996) Protecting Australia’s rivers, wetlands and estuaries of high conservation value R.T. Kingsford, H. Dunn, D. Love, J. Nevill, J. Stein and J. Tait ii Published by: Department of the Environment and Heritage GPO Box 2182 Canberra ACT 2601 Telephone: (02) 6263 6000 Facsimile: (02) 6263 6099 Email: land&[email protected] Website: www.lwa.gov.au © Land & Water Australia Disclaimer: The information contained in this publication is intended for general use, to assist public knowledge and discussion, and to help improve the sustainable management of land, water and vegetation. The information should not be relied upon for the purpose of a particular matter. Legal advice should be obtained before any action or decision is taken on the basis of any material in this document. The Australian Government, Land & Water Australia and the authors do not assume liability of any kind whatsoever resulting from any person’s use or reliance upon the content of this document. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government, the Minister for the Environment and Heritage or Land & Water Australia. Publication data: Protecting Australia’s rivers, wetlands and estuaries of high conservation value, R.T.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is Tasmania Nature
    THIS IS TASMANIA NATURE Dove Lake, Cradle Mountain NATURE It makes natural sense. After InternatioNAl all, this is a treasure island of TREASURES 4 World Heritage Area sites with ADVENTURE ISlAND 6 national parks encompassing DEVIlS oF A TIME 8 an astounding one fifth of ABoVE AND BEYoND 10 Tasmania’s total area. To top WATERWAYS, WIlDERNESS, that there’s more than 1,000 WIlDlIFE 12 mountains to explore, including WAlKS oN THE WIlDSIDE 14 one right in the backyard of go WITH THE FloW 16 the biggest city. What better THE PERFECT CAST 18 environment, then, for a range ITINERARIES & MAP 20 of mild to wild adventures from wilderness walks to wildlife- spotting, dam abseiling to river cruising. Bishop & Clerk, Maria Island 4 NATURE NATIoNAl PARKS 5 Lake Dove, Cradle Mountain Russell Falls, Mt Field National Park INTERNATIoNAl TREASURES World Heritage Area (WHA) sites around the world that encompass 1.38 million hectares, or a staggering 20 diversity of habitats and ecosystems for plants and animals Field National Park, close to Hobart is one of the island’s tend to meet only a few of the 10 criteria required for per cent of the island. While much of this is superbly wild that are found nowhere else on earth. The Douglas- most popular parks and a dreamworld of waterfalls and their prestigious UNESCO listing. But only two locations and tantalisingly remote, parts of it are easy to discover. Apsley National Park, near Bicheno on Tasmania’s east mountain scenery. The South Bruny National Park meet seven of them – one is in China and the other is Effortless access points include Cradle Mountain and coast, features the Lookout Track Circuit, which takes just boasts a striking beach which runs to an elevated cape in, yes, Tasmania.
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers, Wild and Free
    Rivers, Wild and Free by Quentin Duthie The Federated Mountain Clubs has a proud tradition of advocacy for the places that make recreation in New Zealand special, from mountaintops to rainforest, from wilderness to popular walks. One type of landscape we sometimes take for Clyde campaign added professionals, whitewater granted – but value and enjoy as much as any enthusiasts and acclimatisation societies (now other – is our wild river landscapes. Rivers are known as Fish & Game) to create a force greater central to our identity as New Zealanders, to the than the sum of its parts. land we know and love, and to our recreation A lesser known but more successful – be it with boat, boots or rod. From the Motu campaign was the 1970s one to save the Motu to the Landsborough, our wild rivers also form River, one of the North Island’s most important part of New Zealand’s ‘100% Pure’ international wilderness whitewater rivers. There were reputation. Take for instance, the recent surge proposals for two or more dams that would have of kayaking interest in the rivers of the West destroyed the river’s integrity and one of the best Coast, now recognised as one of the world’s multi-day whitewater trips in the country. The NZ great whitewater destinations. New Zealand is Canoeing Association and FMC fought against the also renowned for its protection of rivers, but dam proposals, and the campaign ultimately led this impression is misleading. to the 1981 Wild and Scenic Rivers legislation. The New Zealand conservation movement, The Motu became New Zealand’s first ‘Wild and with FMC to the forefront, crystallised in Scenic River’, and in 1984 the first river with a the 1970s through major campaigns to save Water Conservation Order (WCO).
    [Show full text]
  • Wild and Scenic River Conservation in New Zealand
    WILD AND SCENIC RIVER CONSERVATION IN NEW ZEALAND A thesis submitted in part 1 fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Geography in the University of Canterbury by C.D.C. OLDHAM -;:::: UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE CHAPTER List of Figures i List of Tables i Acknowledgerrents ii Abstract iii ONE INTRODUCTION 1 Genesis of the Policy 2 Characteristics of the System 5 International Comparisons 9 Aims of this Thesis 11 TWO RIVERS AND THE CONSERVATION MOVEMENT IN NEW ZEALAND 14 Conservation: What is it? 14 River Conservation in New Zealand and the role of the Conservation Movement 18 What is the Conservation Movement? 18 The Conservation Movement in New Zealand 22 Conserving the Rivers 36 Summary 37 THREE THE GENESIS OF THE WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS POLICY 39 Why the 1970s? 39 A Wild and Scenic Rivers Policy for New Zealand? 46 International Comparisons 61 FOUR THE WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS POLICY IN OPERATION 68 The Conservation Order Procedure 68 The Best policy for New Zealand? 75 1985 - A New policy? 84 Summary 88 FIVE THE MOTU AND RAKAIA RIVERS: SETTING THE PRECEDENTS OR ILLUSTRATING THE DEFICIENCIES 90 The Motu River 90 The Rakaia River 100 Summary: Setting the precedents or Illustrating the Deficienc~es 105 SIX WILD AND SCENIC DESIGNATION: IS IT NEEDED? 108 The Extent of the Wild and Scenic Rivers policy 108 The Threats to Wild and Scenic Rivers III Conclusion: The Wild and Scenic Rivers policy: Do we need it? 118 BIBLIOGRAPHY '122 LIsr OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 1.1 Application Process for water Conservation Orders 6 2.1 The Conservation Continuum 17 2.2 The Conservation Movement pyramid 21 2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • A Framework to Protect Wild Rivers in Queensland – the Wild Rivers Bill 2005 (Qld)
    Queensland Parliamentary Library A Framework to Protect Wild Rivers in Queensland – the Wild Rivers Bill 2005 (Qld) On 24 May 2005, the Wild Rivers Bill 2005 (Qld) (the Bill) was introduced into the Queensland Legislative Assembly by the then Minister for Natural Resources and Mines, the Hon Stephen Robertson MP. It seeks to protect the last of Queensland’s free flowing rivers which have most, or all, of their natural values intact. The Bill will provide a structure for the declaration of a river as a ‘wild river’. The Bill will not, of itself, designate certain rivers to be ‘wild rivers’. Rather, it will provide a process for making a wild river declaration which will involve extensive consultation with communities before the declaration is finalised. Existing legislation (13 Acts) will be amended to control development activities and resource allocations in declared wild river areas. These regulatory measures will also take into account community input. Certain activities, such as agriculture, animal husbandry, vegetation clearing, mining, and construction of dams and weirs, that have an immediate or substantial impact on the more sensitive ‘high preservation area’ will not be permitted. Activities and uses in other parts of the wild river area will be carefully managed. From the time the public notification of the intention to declare a wild river is given, a moratorium can be imposed to stop ‘panic’ development, clearing of vegetation, interfering with water, and other potentially damaging activities in the relevant area. Nicolee Dixon Research Brief No 2005/15 Queensland Parliamentary Library Research Publications and Resources Section Ms Karen Sampford, Director (07) 3406 7116 Mrs Nicolee Dixon, Senior Parliamentary Research Officer (07) 3406 7409 Ms Renee Giskes, Parliamentary Research Officer (07) 3406 7241 Research Publications are compiled for Members of the Queensland Parliament, for use in parliamentary debates and for related parliamentary purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Gordon River Recreation Zone Plan
    Lower Gordon River Recreation Zone Plan November 1998 A subsidiary document to the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Management Plan Parks and W ild life Service Approved for publication on 11 November by the honourable David Llewellyn MHA, Minister administering the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1970 ISBN: 0 7246 6221 9 © 1998 Parks and Wildlife Service A division of the Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment Published by Parks and Wildlife Service GPO Box 44A Hobart 7001 Parks and Wildlife Service Executive summary The plan supplements the findings of the Gordon River Tourist Operations Inquiry conducted by the Honourable Sir Max Bingham QC in 1994. The object of this plan is to prescribe management policy to conserve the environment of the lower Gordon River and provide the environmental framework within which the river can be presented to visitors. The geomorphology of the area, including the already degraded river banks, is of outstanding significance at a global level. The plan acknowledges the importance of the river to the Tasmanian tourism industry and the economy of Strahan, and the sensitivity of the environment, particularly the banks of the river, to disturbance. The aim of the plan is to facilitate environmental sustainability and ecotourism world best practices in accordance with the significance of the Gordon River environment. The plan provides scope for the existing tourist vessel operations to continue and be improved and for new ventures to be established, once there is no doubt that their impact on the river environment will be within the limits of acceptable change. The limit of acceptable change does not include wash induced erosion of the river banks as erosion is a reversal of the natural depositional processes that formerly operated in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Wenlock Wild River Declaration Proposal the Wilderness Society (Qld) Inc Submission May 2008
    Wenlock Wild River Declaration Proposal The Wilderness Society (Qld) Inc Submission May 2008 The Wenlock River near Stone’s Crossing. Photo: Glenn Walker The Wilderness Society Wenlock Wild River Declaration Proposal Submission Executive Summary The Wenlock River is one of our last great wild rivers. This spectacular river is home to the richest diversity of freshwater fish in Australia, is one of Australia’s best crocodile habitats, and is an important oasis for native wildlife on Cape York during the dry season. The Wenlock is also of great cultural, spiritual and economic importance to the local Indigenous Traditional Owners. This irreplaceable river system deserves full protection from the destructive threats, such as strip mining, dams and intensive agriculture that have destroyed so many other Australian river systems. For this reason, The Wilderness Society (TWS) strongly supports the protection and management of the river through a declaration of the Wenlock River Basin under the Wild Rivers Act 2005 (the Act). TWS commends the Government for the mapping of special features including the Coolibah Springs Complex, the Port Musgrave Wetlands Complex and Embley Range Aggregation. However there is strong scientific evidence to support the extension of the Coolibah Springs High Preservation Area to cover the adjoining bauxite plateau, and ensure the protection of wild river values from the threats associated with strip-mining. There is a clear hydrologic connection between the bauxite plateau, the springs, and the Wenlock River’s baseflow, which is particularly important in the dry season. Headwaters of the Wenlock River and waterholes are also vital to the healthy ecology of the river system and must be afforded stronger protection under the declaration.
    [Show full text]
  • Franklin River Rafters and Other Western Tasmanian Wilderness Parks Users: Their Characteristics, Experiences and Attitudes As Inputs to Management
    FRANKLIN RIVER RAFTERS AND OTHER WESTERN TASMANIAN WILDERNESS PARKS USERS: THEIR CHARACTERISTICS, EXPERIENCES AND ATTITUDES AS INPUTS TO MANAGEMENT by G-ef° BERNARD CARLINGTON B.Sc., M.E.Des.(E.S.) being a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Centre for Environmental Studies University of Tasmania Hobart October 1988 ABSTRACT FRANKLIN RIVER RAFTERS AND OTHER WESTERN TASMANIAN WILDERNESS PARKS USERS: THEIR CHARACTERISTICS, EXPERIENCES AND ATTITUDES AS INPUTS TO MANAGEMENT Tasmania's Franklin - Lower Gordon Wild Rivers National Park, together with the other Western Tasmanian Wilderness Parks, was entered onto the United Nations World Heritage List in 1982. Encompassing one of the largest south temperate wilderness areas in the world, these three contiguous parks provide opportunities for a range of recreation activities from vehicle-based sightseeing to extended wilderness white-water rafting. Recreational pressures on all of the parks are increasing and they are now being seen, not only as reserves of major biological and ecological importance, but also as important components of an increasingly tourist based economy. Both development within the parks to support recreational use and their general management have been intuitively based and until recently the acquisition of visitor data for planning purposes has been a very low priority. It is contended that, in the face of increasingly scarce resources and the need to provide a recreation environment that will allow maximum visitor satisfaction consistent with the conservation of the parks, the planning process must take due account of the nature of the recreation experience and the objectives of participants.
    [Show full text]