DOCSLIB.ORG

How to Reclaim Your Rights As an Author Without Feeding the Beast

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
How to Reclaim Your Rights As an Author Without Feeding the Beast Elsevier's 2017 profits exceeded $1.2 billion: how to reclaim your rights as an author without feeding the beast Brought to you by: Making your research freely-accessible to ocean managers, NGOs, and the public with MarXiv Nick Wehner Director of Open Initiatives, OCTO @MarXivPapers An abridged history of academic publishing What is MarXiv? The academic publishing workflow How to determine what you can share, when Agenda Versioning, citations, and other nitty-gritty details Demo: How to archive a paper in MarXiv Demo: How to search/browse for papers in MarXiv Q&A and archiving help @MarXivPapers An abridged history of academic publishing The “traditional” academic publishing ecosystem is hardly traditional at all @MarXivPapers Academic publishing as we know it now started with the end of WWII An abridged 1945 ⎯ present 1600s ⎯ 1945 history of “[…] for most scholars and many of their publishers, scholarly publication was routinely seen as unprofitable: the potential market academic was so small and uncertain that few scholarly publications were expected to cover their costs. Those costs – of paper, ink, publishing typesetting, and printing – were often paid in full or in part by authors or by a third-party, such as a patron or sponsor; and this enabled the copies to be sold at a subsidised price, or even distributed gratis.” Untangling Academic Publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, @MarXivPapers academic prestige and the circulation of research. May 2017. What happened ~1945? Status not determined by social stature, but by publication history Increase in number of higher education institutions due to WWII veteran’s benefits Lots more government money into higher education “Just 2.7% of the UK age-cohort had gone into higher education in An abridged 1938; that had risen to 15% by the 1980s (Anderson, 2010; Perkin, 1987); and in the early tWenty-first century, the UK government target Was history of 50%” Explosion of publications academic Scientific news and short research reports à long, detailed research reports publishing Free & subsidized selling to individuals à Selling to institutions at a profit Focus on local area, language à focus on international markets, establish English as international language of science Publications dominated by scholarly societies à commercial players recruiting their oWn editors, editorial board members and referees Peer revieW to account for limited space à peer revieW for prestige Untangling Academic Publishing: A history of the relationship betWeen commercial interests, academic @MarXivPapers prestige and the circulation of research. May 2017. A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer revieW. July 2017. 2000s to today Mergers and acquisitions give rise to oligopolies Springer Nature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, and Taylor & Francis An abridged account for 50% of global research output for the natural sciences; 70% for the social sciences history of The Serials Crisis “The increasing output of academic publishing during the 1950s and academic 1960s coincided with the expansion of universities and the availability of generous funding for core functions such as libraries. By the 1980s, publishing the contraction of core university funding meant libraries were unable to keep up with the growth in academic publishing. This became widely known as the ‘serials crisis’” Untangling Academic Publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, @MarXivPapers academic prestige and the circulation of research. May 2017. Academic publishing today @MarXivPapers Academic publishing today @MarXivPapers Subscriptions are really expensive! In 2009, Tier 1 universities paid on average $1.2 million a year to Elsevier alone (DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1403006111) Journal subscription costs up 25% from 2013-2017 (DOI: 10.7554/eLife.32822.001) Annual e-journal subscription costs $1,396 (DOI: 10.7554/eLife.32822.001) Publishers “bundle” journals just like cable companies Academic Libraries can buy a bundle of journals for a discount, or buy à la carte and end up spending more money Publishers are Each year, publishers add more titles to the bundles, and thus upping the cost, but they still make sure the bundles come out cheaper than For-Profit buying titles individually Hybrid journals engage in “Double Dipping” Companies Publishers do not offer a discount to subscribers for OA content Hybrid journal APCs cost ~$650 (34%) more than fully-OA journals (Monitoring the Transition to Open Access, December 2017) Elsevier’s profits are enormous! 2017 profit margin: 37% (https://www.relx.com/~/media/Files/R/RELX- Group/documents/reports/annual-reports/relx2017-annual-report.pdf) 2017 Revenue: $3,510,409,140 Apple: 21%, Shell Oil: 21%, Alphabet (Google): 14%, Comcast: 13% @MarXivPapers Universities, “Universities in the Netherlands canceled all Oxford University governments, Press subscriptions in May 2017” and think- “University of Montreal reduced its subscriptions to Taylor & Francis periodicals by 93%, axing 2,231 journals” tanks are “Negotiations with Elsevier reached impasses in Germany, Peru, cancelling and Taiwan. As a result, hundreds of universities have cancelled all Elsevier subscriptions” subscriptions Research: Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature. February 2018. @MarXivPapers https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32822.001 The Nature Conservancy in the USA 3 The Nature Conservancy in Mexico 0 How many Washington State Department of Natural Resources 0 ocean journals “The Nature Conservancy’s chief science officer, Hugh Possingham, is exploring new ways to access publications and has encouraged staff do groups to develop relationships with universities or seeK adjunct faculty roles [… for] the benefit of providing staff with access to university library have access databases” (https://www.newsdeeply.com/oceans/articles/2018/01/18/tear- down-that-paywall-the-movement-to-make-ocean-research-free-for-all) to? We know that publisher-held copyrights result in less primary science being used for ocean management A study of MPA management plans in three countries found that primary scientific research from journals represented just 14% of the information cited in the plans (Cvitanovic 2014, doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/HV4DA) @MarXivPapers MarXiv to the Rescue! Kind of like a Band-Aid on a leaky dam… @MarXivPapers MarXiv (rhymes with “archive”) is the research repository for the ocean-related sciences Repository: https://MarXiv.org Documentation: https://www.MarXivInfo.org MarXiv @MarXivPapers Preprints and postprints of paywalled peer-reviewed journal articles Open Access papers Reports and whitepapers Posters, abstracts, and conference proceedings What should I Datasets, maps, and GIS information share in Please, please, please share manuscripts that you would (likely) not otherwise publish in “traditional journals” MarXiv? Managers and planners really want to see papers on negative results What doesn’t work is just as important as what does! Did your paper get rejected because it’s too niche? Publish it in MarXiv! If it’s science to support ocean conservation and climate-change adaptation, MarXiv is the place for it! @MarXivPapers Advisory Board Asha de Vos, Oceanswell Ashley Farley, Gates Foundation Chloë Webster, Mediterranean Protected Areas Network (MedPAN) The MarXiv Team at OCTO Dasapta Erwin Irawan, INA-Rxiv & Institut Teknologi Nick Wehner Bandung Director of Open Edd Hind-Ozan, Cardiff University & SCB Marine Initiatives Edgar Robles, Universidad del Mar Raye Evrard Project Edward Senkondo, Tanzania Fisheries Research Who is Manager Institute Allie Brown Jennie Hoffman, Adaptation/Insight Project Associate Jon Tennant, PaleorXiv & ScienceOpen MarXiv? Kanae Tokunaga, Ocean Alliance, The University of Sarah Carr Tokyo Chief Knowledge Ling Cao, Shanghai Jiao Tong University & Stanford Broker University John Davis President Michelle LaRue, University of Minnesota Ting-Chun Kuo, Ocean Says & University of British Columbia Wilf Swartz, Ocean Policy Research Institute, Sasakawa Peace Foundation Willow Battista, Consultant, Oceans Program, Environmental Defense Fund @MarXivPapers Canada Simon Fraser University: David Shiffman University of British Columbia: Juliano Palacios Abrantes Chile Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile: Moisés Gallo MarXiv Mexico Ambassadors Universidad del Mar: Sarai Mijangos Nigeria Nigerian Institute for Oceanography and Marine Research: Ngozi Margaret Oguguah United States University of Washington: Nicole Baker @MarXivPapers In only 5 months, MarXiv has saved ocean conservationists over $28,900 in per-article download fees on just seven pay-walled papers! Over 3,400 downloads 69 papers (journal articles, reports, theses, etc.) 192 on a single preprint $6,902.40 saved just from that preprint MarXiv in 500+ downloads in the last week NGOs and government agencies archiving reports to get DOIs and action indexed in Google Scholar “I had begun to use sharing platforms like ResearchGate and Academia.edu, but these platforms are/will change their business model and find other ways to profit from our work,” Wesley Flannery, a lecturer at Queen’s University, Belfast, who recently submitted a paper to MarXiv, said in an email. “I trust the team behind MarXiv,” he said. (Oceans Deeply, 18 January 2018, “Tear Down That Paywall: The Movement to Make Ocean Research Free for All”) @MarXivPapers ”You can always
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Grey Literature in Library and Information Studies
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2010 Grey Literature in Library and Information Studies Dominic J. Farace GreyNet International Joachim Schöpfel University of Lille Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, Scholarly Communication Commons, and the Scholarly Publishing Commons Farace, Dominic J. and Schöpfel, Joachim, "Grey Literature in Library and Information Studies" (2010). Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc.. 162. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/162 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Grey Literature in Library and Information Studies Edited by Dominic J. Farace and Joachim Schöpfel De Gruyter Saur An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org ISBN 978-3-11-021808-4 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-021809-1 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-021806-2 ISSN 0179-0986 e-ISSN 0179-3256 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License, as of February 23, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Preprints, Institutional Repositories, and the Version of Record
    Purdue University Purdue e-Pubs Charleston Library Conference Preprints, Institutional Repositories, and the Version of Record Judy Luther Informed Strategies, [email protected] Ivy Anderson California Digital Library Monica Bradford Science John Inglis bioRxiv Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston Part of the Library and Information Science Commons An indexed, print copy of the Proceedings is also available for purchase at: http://www.thepress.purdue.edu/series/charleston. You may also be interested in the new series, Charleston Insights in Library, Archival, and Information Sciences. Find out more at: http://www.thepress.purdue.edu/series/charleston-insights-library-archival- and-information-sciences. Judy Luther, Ivy Anderson, Monica Bradford, and John Inglis, "Preprints, Institutional Repositories, and the Version of Record" (2017). Proceedings of the Charleston Library Conference. http://dx.doi.org/10.5703/1288284316717 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. Preprints, Institutional Repositories, and the Version of Record Presented by Judy Luther, Informed Strategies; Ivy Anderson, California Digital Library; Monica Bradford, Science; and John Inglis, bioRxiv The following is a transcription of a live presentation I thought, “I’m not even sure I have the questions to at the 2017 Charleston Conference. ask at this point.” Judy Luther: I’m Judy Luther. I have a background I have a very helpful panel who has come up with that pretty much covers all different sectors of the some very good questions. The one percolating for market. I started as an academic librarian.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Access Availability of Scientific Publications
    Analytical Support for Bibliometrics Indicators Open access availability of scientific publications Analytical Support for Bibliometrics Indicators Open access availability of scientific publications* Final Report January 2018 By: Science-Metrix Inc. 1335 Mont-Royal E. ▪ Montréal ▪ Québec ▪ Canada ▪ H2J 1Y6 1.514.495.6505 ▪ 1.800.994.4761 [email protected] ▪ www.science-metrix.com *This work was funded by the National Science Foundation’s (NSF) National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of NCSES or the NSF. The analysis for this research was conducted by SRI International on behalf of NSF’s NCSES under contract number NSFDACS1063289. Analytical Support for Bibliometrics Indicators Open access availability of scientific publications Contents Contents .............................................................................................................................................................. i Tables ................................................................................................................................................................. ii Figures ................................................................................................................................................................ ii Abstract ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • March 13, 2019 AMS Primer on Open Access
    Robert M. Harington Associate Executive Director, Publishing Publishing Division [email protected] 401.455.4165 401.331.3842 www.ams.org AMS Primer on Open Access Introduction Open access (OA) refers to published scholarly content (such as journal research articles, and books) made openly available in online digital form. This content is free of charge at point of use, free of most copyright and licensing restrictions, and free of technical or other barriers to access (such as digital rights management or requirements to register to access). Communicating and sharing discoveries is an essential part of the research process. Any author of a research paper wants it to be read, and the fewer restrictions placed on access to those papers means that more people may benefit from the research. In many ways, the OA movement is very much in line with the shared mission of researchers, scholarly societies, and publishers. Journal publishing programs perform many services for researchers including peer review, communication, and career advancement. In society publishing programs, revenue from journal publishing directly supports the important work societies do on behalf of their scholarly communities. How do we maximize the dissemination of knowledge while at the same time maintaining both a high level of quality and a sustainable financial future for our professional society, the AMS? The OA movement can be traced to a letter from the year 2000, signed by around 34,000 researchers, demanding publishers make all content free after 6 months. The signatories of the letter said they would boycott any journals refusing to comply. In 2002, the accepted definition of OA was encapsulated in the Budapest Open Access Initiative declaration.
    [Show full text]
  • Incites Lunedi’ 26 Ottobre 14.30-15.30 Questa Sessione Tratta Le Nozioni Basiche Di Utilizzo Di Incites
    NOZIONI DI BASE InCites Lunedi’ 26 ottobre 14.30-15.30 Questa sessione tratta le nozioni basiche di utilizzo di InCites. InCites dataset: come e quando viene creato e dove CNR trovare le informazioni relative. Come esportare un set di dati da Web of Science a InCites e come visualizzare un set di papers da InCites su Web of Science. Altre possibilità di caricamento di un dataset. Come funzionano i filtri e come selezionare i vari indicatori. Come visualizzare i diversi tipi di grafici, come salvare e/o condividere un “tile”. Come esportare le tabelle, i grafici e le metriche a livello di articolo. Registrazione → LE PRINCIPALI CARATTERISTICHE DEI VARI MODULI E DEI SYSTEM REPORTS Martedi’ 27 ottobre 14.30-15.30 Questa sessione prende in considerazione le principali caratteristiche dei 6 moduli Explorer e dei due tipi di report di sistema. Le differenze tra i vari moduli e come è possibile passare da un modulo all’altro (refocus). Le unificazioni sottostanti (organizzazioni, editori, agenzie di finanziamento): limiti e caratteristiche. Le baselines, ovverosia come crearsi un proprio benchmark. La classificazione per aree geografiche NUTS. Limiti ed esempi. Le collaborazioni internazionali e con l’industria. Le analisi sull’Open Access. Registrazione → LA VALUTAZIONE DI UN PAPER, DI UN AUTORE O DI UNA ISTITUZIONE Mercoledi’ 28 ottobre 11.00-12.00 Questa sessione presenta l’utilizzo dei dati di Web of Science Core Collection per le valutazioni: il concetto di citazione (e indicatore) normalizzato, l’importanza della categorizzazione, i principali ranking internazionali, la passata e la presente VQR, i percentili, la posizione degli autori, i dati per la ASN (con ESCI) e l’analisi dei profili personali, il problema delle autocitazioni, i Web Services.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolving Preprint Landscape
    The evolving preprint landscape Introductory report for the Knowledge Exchange working group on preprints. Based on contributions from the Knowledge Exchange Preprints Advisory Group (see page 12) and edited by Jonathan Tennant ([email protected]). 1. Introduction 1.1. A brief history of preprints 1.2. What is a preprint? 1.3 Benefits of using preprints 1.4. Current state of preprints 1.4.1. The recent explosion of preprint platforms and services 2. Recent policy developments 3. Trends and future predictions 3.1. Overlay journals and services 3.2. Global expansion 3.3. Research on preprints 3.4. Community development 4. Gaps in the present system 5. Main stakeholder groups 6. Business and funding models Acknowledgements References 1. Introduction 1.1. A brief history of preprints In 1961, the USA National Institutes of Health (NIH) launched a program called Information Exchange Groups, designed for the circulation of biological preprints, but this shut down in 1967 (Confrey, 1996; Cobb, 2017). In 1991, the arXiv repository was launched for physics, computer science, and mathematics, which is when preprints (or ‘e-prints’) began to increase in popularity and attention (Wikipedia ArXiv#History; Jackson, 2002). The Social Sciences Research Network (SSRN) was launched in 1994, and in 1997 Research Papers in Economics (Wikipedia RePEc) was launched. In 2008, the research network platforms Academia.edu and ResearchGate were both launched and allowed sharing of research papers at any stage. In 2013, two new biological preprint servers were launched, bioRxiv (by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) and PeerJ Preprints (by PeerJ) (Wikipedia BioRxiv; Wikipedia PeerJ).
    [Show full text]
  • GL21 Proceedings Twentieth-First International Conference on Grey Literature “Open Science Encompasses New Forms of Grey Literature”
    Twenty-First International Conference on Grey Literature Open Science Encompasses New Forms of Grey Literature German National Library of Science and Technology Hannover, Germany ● October 22-23, 2019 Program and Conference Sponsors GL21 Program and Conference Bureau Javastraat 194-HS, 1095 CP Amsterdam, Netherlands www.textrelease.com ▪ [email protected] TextRelease Tel. +31-20-331.2420 CIP GL21 Proceedings Twentieth-First International Conference on Grey Literature “Open Science Encompasses New Forms of Grey Literature”. - German National Library of Science and Technology, Hannover, Germany, October 22-23, 2019 / compiled by D. Farace and J. Frantzen ; GreyNet International, Grey Literature Network Service. – Amsterdam : TextRelease, February 2020. – 173 p. – Author Index. – (GL Conference Series, ISSN 1386-2316 ; No. 21). TIB (DE), DANS-KNAW (NL), CVTISR (SK), EBSCO (USA), ISTI CNR (IT), KISTI (KR), NIS IAEA (UN), NTK (CZ), and the University of Florida (USA) are Corporate Authors and Associate Members of GreyNet International. These proceedings contain full text conference papers presented during the two days of plenary, panel, and poster sessions. The papers appear in the same order as in the conference program book. Included is an author index with the names of contributing authors and researchers along with their biographical notes. A list of 55 participating organizations as well as sponsored advertisements are likewise included. ISBN 978-90-77484-37-1 © TextRelease, 2020 2 Foreword O P E N S C I E N C E E NCOMPASSES N EW F O R M S O F G R E Y L ITERATURE For more than a quarter century, grey Literature communities have explored ways to open science to other methods of reviewing, publishing, and making valuable information resources publicly accessible.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full White Paper
    Open Access White Paper University of Oregon SENATE SUB-COMMITTEE ON OPEN ACCESS I. Executive Summary II. Introduction a. Definition and History of the Open Access Movement b. History of Open Access at the University of Oregon c. The Senate Subcommittee on Open Access at the University of Oregon III. Overview of Current Open Access Trends and Practices a. Open Access Formats b. Advantages and Challenges of the Open Access Approach IV. OA in the Process of Research & Dissemination of Scholarly Works at UO a. A Summary of Current Circumstances b. Moving Towards Transformative Agreements c. Open Access Publishing at UO V. Advancing Open Access at the University of Oregon and Beyond a. Barriers to Moving Forward with OA b. Suggestions for Local Action at UO 1 Executive Summary The state of global scholarly communications has evolved rapidly over the last two decades, as libraries, funders and some publishers have sought to hasten the spread of more open practices for the dissemination of results in scholarly research worldwide. These practices have become collectively known as Open Access (OA), defined as "the free, immediate, online availability of research articles combined with the rights to use these articles fully in the digital environment." The aim of this report — the Open Access White Paper by the Senate Subcommittee on Open Access at the University of Oregon — is to review the factors that have precipitated these recent changes and to explain their relevance for members of the University of Oregon community. Open Access History and Trends Recently, the OA movement has gained momentum as academic institutions around the globe have begun negotiating and signing creative, new agreements with for-profit commercial publishers, and as innovations to the business models for disseminating scholarly research have become more widely adopted.
    [Show full text]
  • Postprint and Replication in Kinesiology (STORK) Peer Reviewed
    Part of the Society for Transparency, Openness Postprint and Replication in Kinesiology (STORK) Peer Reviewed Basic statistical considerations for physiology: The journal Temperature toolbox Aaron R. Caldwella* and Samuel N. Cheuvrontb aExercise Science Research Center, University of Arkansas–Fayetteville, Fayetteville, United States; bBiophysics and Biomedical Modelling Division, US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, United States *corresponding author Address for Correspondence: Aaron R. Caldwell, M.Sc. [email protected] This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Temperature on June 25th, 2019. A full, copy-edited version is available on the publisher’s website. Please cite as: Caldwell, A. R., & Cheuvront, S. N. (2019). Basic statistical considerations for physiology: The journal Temperature toolbox. Temperature, 6(3), 181–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2019.1624131 Keywords: statistics, metascience, NHST, power analysis, experimental design, effect sizes, open science, nonparametric, preregistration, bootstrapping, optional stopping Abbreviations AIPE: Accuracy in parameter estimation ANOVA: Analysis of variance CV: Coefficient of variation NHST: Null hypothesis significance testing TOST: Two one-sided tests SESOI: Smallest effect size of interest All authors have read and approved this version of the manuscript to be shared on SportRxiv. The publisher’s version article was published on June 25th, 2019; in accordance with Taylor & Francis accepted manuscript policy and Green OA embargo policy as of June 25th 2020 the accepted manuscript may now be shared on a subject repository. Author ARC @exphysstudent can be reached on Twitter. Abstract The average environmental and occupational physiologist may find statistics are difficult to interpret and use since their formal training in statistics is limited.
    [Show full text]
  • FISH and SHELLFISH IMMUNOLOGY the Official Journal of the International Society of Fish and Shellfish Immunology (ISFSI)
    FISH AND SHELLFISH IMMUNOLOGY The official journal of the International Society of Fish and Shellfish Immunology (ISFSI) AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK TABLE OF CONTENTS XXX . • Description p.1 • Impact Factor p.1 • Abstracting and Indexing p.1 • Editorial Board p.2 • Guide for Authors p.3 ISSN: 1050-4648 DESCRIPTION . Fish and Shellfish Immunology rapidly publishes high-quality, peer-refereed contributions in the expanding fields of fish and shellfish immunology. It presents studies on the basic mechanisms of both the specific and non-specific defense systems, the cells, tissues, and humoral factors involved, their dependence on environmental and intrinsic factors, response to pathogens, response to vaccination, and applied studies on the development of specific vaccines for use in the aquaculture industry. Database coverage includes Biological Abstracts (BIOSIS); Current Contents; SciSearch and Research Alert. Science Citation Index and Focus on: Veterinary Science and Medicine. Journal of Fish and Shellfish Immunology is the companion title to the open access journal Fish and Shellfish Immunology Reports. Benefits to authors We also provide many author benefits, such as free PDFs, a liberal copyright policy, special discounts on Elsevier publications and much more. Please click here for more information on our author services . Please see our Guide for Authors for information on article submission. If you require any further information or help, please visit our Support Center IMPACT FACTOR . 2020: 4.581 © Clarivate Analytics Journal Citation
    [Show full text]
  • OPEN ACCESS to RESEARCH Open Science Is an Umbrella Terms That Refers to Practices Aiming to Make All Stages of Science More Open and Transparent
    BRIEF 1: OCTOBER 2020 To help inform the special education research community, these briefs feature information on prominent open science practices. Content comes from our series of short articles in the DR newsletter, Focus on Research, as well as additional content developed by DR members. OPEN ACCESS TO RESEARCH Open science is an umbrella terms that refers to practices aiming to make all stages of science more open and transparent. Although some have argued that open science can make research more trustworthy, impactful, and efficient in special education (Cook et al., 2018), there is a lack of clarity in the field about what open-science practices are, their primary benefits and potential obstacles, and how to access resources for implementing them. In this brief, we discuss arguably the best-known aspect of open science: open access. Why Open Access? A primary purpose for organization with a subscription. Those without such research in special access have to pay to access research content. For education is to inform example, if a practitioner wanted to access articles and improve practice and from Teaching Exceptional Children on an evidence- policy as well as future based practice she was considering using, and she did research. For research to not belong to CEC and was not a student at university have its intended and full with a subscription, she would have to pay $36 to ? effect, practitioners, access each article of interest. The potential benefit of policy makers, and other research is not realized if practitioners, policy makers, researchers must be able and researchers (e.g., researchers in developing to have access to it.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Access Self-Archiving of Refereed Research: a Post-Gutenberg Compromise Stevan Harnad University of Southhampton, [email protected]
    Against the Grain Volume 23 | Issue 2 Article 9 April 2011 Open Access Self-Archiving of Refereed Research: A Post-Gutenberg Compromise Stevan Harnad University of Southhampton, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/atg Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation Harnad, Stevan (2011) "Open Access Self-Archiving of Refereed Research: A Post-Gutenberg Compromise," Against the Grain: Vol. 23: Iss. 2, Article 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7771/2380-176X.5786 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. However, many publishers either do not make our collective understanding of the type of de- Journal Article Versioning is … any changes to the version of record or display mands from scholarly readers and practitioners from page 20 non-standard indicators when such changes oc- for article versioning standards. cur. SAGE is prepared to contribute to shared practices to release material of the highest pos- efforts toward clear and acceptable practices sible quality, published within known patterns for iterations beyond the version of record. Endnotes and bearing standard mechanisms of cataloging SAGE is prepared to launch another wave of 1. The summer 2010 survey was conducted and archiving, such as ISSNs and DOIs. Jour- production and platform enhancements to our by NISO across representatives of key nal article version metadata are now a facet of journals publishing program that allow clear groups — repository managers, librarians, publishers’ responsibilities in disseminating indications of changes to an article’s version and journal publishers and editors — to learn scholarly material online.
    [Show full text]