DOCSLIB.ORG

99-KA-058 State of Louisiana V. Rogers Joseph Lacaze

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
99-KA-058 State of Louisiana V. Rogers Joseph Lacaze Revised Copy - 01/25/02 “See News Release 007 for any concurrences and/or dissents.” SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA No. 99-KA-0584 STATE OF LOUISIANA v. ROGER LACAZE On Appeal from the Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans, Honorable Frank A. Marullo, Jr., Judge Traylor, J.* On April 27, 1995, an Orleans Parish Grand Jury indicted the defendant, Roger LaCaze, for three counts of first degree murder in violation of La. Rev. Stat. 14:30. After a trial by jury, the Defendant was found guilty as charged on all three counts. At the conclusion of the penalty phase the jury, having found multiple aggravating factors, unanimously sentenced defendant to death. The trial judge sentenced defendant to death in accordance with the jury determination. This matter is now before this court on direct appeal. La. Const. art. V, § 5(D).1 On appeal, Defendant alleges twenty- seven assignments of error for the reversal of his conviction and sentence.2 Finding no merit to Defendant’s assignments of error, we affirm his sentence and conviction. Factual Background and Procedural History *Retired Judge Robert L. Lobrano, assigned as Justice Pro Tempore, participating in the decision. 1La. Const. Art. V, § 5(D) provides that a case is appealable to the Louisiana Supreme Court if a defendant has been convicted of a capital offense and a penalty of death has been imposed. 2 Several assignments of error were not discussed in this opinion because they do not represent reversible error and are governed by clearly established principles of law. They will be reviewed in an appendix which will not be published but will comprise part of the record in this case. On April 27, 1995, an Orleans Parish grand jury indicted the defendant Roger3 LaCaze and co-defendant Antoinette Frank for three counts of first degree murder. La. Rev. Stat. 14:30. The cases were severed. Following a five-day bifurcated trial in July of 1995, the defendant was found guilty as charged. Jurors thereafter unanimously recommended imposition of the death penalty on each of three counts. The defendant now appeals. Co-defendant Antoinette Frank, then a 24-year-old New Orleans Police Officer, and 18-year-old defendant Roger LaCaze were charged with murdering two members of the Vu family and a New Orleans Police Officer. The Vus owned and operated the Kim Anh Vietnamese Restaurant, located at 4952 Bullard Road in Eastern New Orleans. Officer Ronald Williams was working a security detail at the restaurant the night of the murders. Evidence at trial established that Antoinette Frank had worked security at the Kim Anh and knew the Vu family. Around 9 p.m. on Friday, March 3, 1995, she called to inquire if she would be needed for the detail that night. Frank spoke with Chau Vu, the 23-year-old daughter of the owner. Chau advised Frank that she was not needed, as Officer Ronald Williams would work from 11 p.m. until closing time, normally around 1 a.m. Frank completed her shift at the 7th District Police Station at 11 p.m. After changing clothes at home, she picked up the defendant and drove directly to the Kim Anh. She entered alone, asking for cold drinks for herself and a "nephew," who remained in the car. Frank spoke with Officer Williams, whom she knew, and with Mrs. Vu. Frank told Chau that she and her nephew were going to a midnight movie, and left with the drinks. Business was slow that evening, and the 3Pleadings and transcripts contain different versions of the defendant's name. He was indicted as "Roger LaCaze." Some volumes of the trial record reflect the defendant's name as "Rogers LaCaze." The defendant himself signed a rights-of-arrestee card as "Rogers LaCaze." 2 family decided to close early. Mrs. Vu went home, leaving her children to clean up. Frank telephoned a pick-up food order about fifteen minutes later to order some food, indicating that she had missed the movie. At this point there were six people in the restaurant: Chau, her 24-year-old sister Ha Vu, her 18-year-old brother Quoc Vu, and her 17-year-old brother Cuong Vu, a waitress named Tu, and 25-year-old Officer Williams. Frank and a man she introduced as her nephew arrived at the restaurant minutes later and were the only customers. Their order was brought out in styrofoam containers, but Frank and her dinner companion decided to eat in the restaurant. Chau took close notice of Frank's dinner partner, later describing him to police as a short African-American with several gold front teeth, carrying a cellular phone.4 Quoc, who was sweeping up around the tables, also made note of Frank's companion because he "kept staring” at Quoc. Frank and the man left without finishing their meal, exited the restaurant, but remained outside, talking. Chau went to attached grocery side of the building, unlocked the doors, and bid them good night. Frank asked if she would be needed Saturday night for the security detail. After checking with Officer Williams, Chau said no, that Williams would handle it. The two got in Frank's car and drove off. Shortly thereafter, Frank and the man returned for a third time. Chau Vu and Quoc Vu were certain that the man accompanying Frank on her third trip to the restaurant was the man she introduced as her nephew, the same person who had eaten with her. Chau was frightened when she saw Frank approaching for the third time. Shouting to Officer Williams and Quoc not to open the doors, Chau gathered the money and ran to the kitchen where her sister Ha and brother Cuong were cleaning. As Chau hid the money in a microwave, she heard Quoc calling for her to come 4 On the first day of trial the defendant was asked to stand and display his (gold) teeth for jurors. Later, Antoinette Frank was shown to the jury. 3 quickly to the front. Quoc had interrupted his sweeping to watch Frank pull into the parking lot, maneuver her car, then exit and walk up to the glass door and begin shaking it. He called to Chau and moved toward the kitchen. Chau was leaving the kitchen area and coming towards him when, suddenly, Quoc saw Antoinette Frank there inside the restaurant. Frank began pushing Chau backward, forcefully and rapidly, toward the kitchen, saying that they needed to talk. Frank tried but failed to grab Quoc. Officer Williams was behind the bar. He had started moving in Chau's and Quoc's direction when Quoc heard "lots of gunshots" from that area. Frank spun around and ran towards the bar and the front of the restaurant. Chau and Quoc ran in the opposite direction, going deeper into the building. They raced through the kitchen and into a large, room-sized cooler, situated between the kitchen and a small grocery the family also operated. As they ran they called to Ha and Cuong, who were by the stoves, to come along. But Ha and Cuong did not follow. Chau testified similarly, that suddenly Antoinette Frank was inside the restaurant pushing her roughly toward the kitchen. It was at a point when she, Quoc, and Frank were together that Chau heard gunfire from the bar area where Officer Williams was located. When Frank left them, Chau, Quoc, and a helper hid in the cooler. Quoc turned off the cooler's lights as they entered and crouched down. From the darkened interior he and Chau were able to see into parts of the kitchen and bar through a small window. Chau saw Frank and her companion running back and forth, all over the kitchen. She saw Frank do something to the phone at the bar. Chau heard more gunfire but was unable to see who was shooting. Quoc observed Frank and her companion running around, rummaging, "digging in this little area where we always 4 hide our money." Then she heard gunfire from the area where he had last seen his siblings, Ha and Cuong. Quoc was positive that the defendant was the man who was with Frank during the shooting. Then Frank and the defendant were gone. From her vantage point inside the cooler, Chau looked through the windows of the grocery to the parking lot and watched Frank's car pull out and drive away. Yet she and Quoc hesitated to leave the relative safety of the cooler, uncertain what they would find and unsure whether Frank and the defendant had left or would return. Chau left the cooler on the grocery side to try to reach the telephone or her cellular phone at the bar. The telephone normally kept on the bar was gone. Going to retrieve her cellular phone, Chau spotted Officer Williams's body and lost all "confidence. .because the person that protects us is lying right there." She returned to the cooler with her cellular phone and attempted unsuccessfully to call 911. She finally reached a friend and asked him to relay news of the shooting and that an officer was hurt. The friend's call was received by 911 operators at 1:48 a.m. While Chau was calling, Quoc left the cooler on the kitchen side to look for his brother and sister. He returned with news that both were lying in pools of blood. Quoc decided to try to reach a friend's house and call police from there. He left through the kitchen and back door. Quoc's call from his friend's home was received by 911 operators at 1:50 a.m.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Death Penalty in Louisiana
    Diminishing All of Us: The Death Penalty in Louisiana Death Chamber, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Angola Photo Courtesy of Richard Ross, Architecture of Authority (Aperture Press, 2007) A Study for Louisiana Catholics Committed to Repeal of the Death Penalty Co-authors: Alex Mikulich & Sophie Cull ©Copyright 2012 Jesuit Social Research Institute Loyola University New Orleans LouisianaLong.indd 1 3/20/12 4:42 PM Table of Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Executive Summary and Major Findings 4 III. Catholic Social Teaching and the Death Penalty 6 A. Louisiana Catholic Bishops on the Death Penalty 6 B. Roman Catholic Theological and Moral Teaching 7 C. Roman Catholic Social Teaching and Social Sin 8 D. The Death Penalty: A Profound Forgetfulness of Eucharistic Remembering 10 IV. The Death Penalty in Context 12 A. The US Death Penalty in the International Context 12 B. The Search for “Humane” Executions: Lethal Injection 12 C. The Movement toward Repeal 13 D. The Death Penalty: Louisiana’s Response to Lynching 13 V. Arbitrary, Inaccurate and Unfair 15 A. Exonerees 15 B. Murder Victims and their Families 16 C. The Condemned 20 Louisiana’s death row is overrepresented by individuals with childhood trauma 22 Many individuals on Louisiana’s death row were under 21 when they were arrested 23 Louisiana’s death row is overrepresented by individuals with intellectual disabilities 24 Louisiana’s death row is overrepresented by individuals with mental illness 25 D. Jurors 27 VI. Weighing the Costs: Alternatives to the Death Penalty 30 A. Cost of Louisiana’s Death Penalty 30 B. Our Misplaced Policy Priorities 31 C.
    [Show full text]
  • THE NEW ORLEANS POLICE EMERGENCY RESPONSE to HURRICANE KATRINA: a CASE STUDY Michael Peter Wigginton Jr
    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Dissertations Fall 12-2007 THE NEW ORLEANS POLICE EMERGENCY RESPONSE TO HURRICANE KATRINA: A CASE STUDY Michael Peter Wigginton Jr. University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations Part of the Emergency and Disaster Management Commons, Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons, Policy History, Theory, and Methods Commons, Social Welfare Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation Wigginton, Michael Peter Jr., "THE NEW ORLEANS POLICE EMERGENCY RESPONSE TO HURRICANE KATRINA: A CASE STUDY" (2007). Dissertations. 1343. https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/1343 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of Southern Mississippi THE NEW ORLEANS POLICE EMERGENCY RESPONSE TO HURRICANE KATRINA: A CASE STUDY by Michael Peter Wigginton, Jr. A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Studies Office of The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Approved: December 2007 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. COPYRIGHT BY MICHAEL WIGGINTON, JR. 2007 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. The University of Southern Mississippi THE NEW ORLEANS POLICE EMERGENCY RESPONSE TO HURRICANE KATRINA: A CASE STUDY by Michael Peter Wigginton Jr. Abstract of a Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Studies Office of the University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2007 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustaining New Orleans : Literature, Local Memory, and the Fate of a City / Barbara Eckstein
    This page intentionally left blank SustainingSstasta g New Orleans Literature, Local Memory, and the Fate of a City Barbara Eckstein First published 2006 by Routledge Published 2017 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business Copyright © 2006 Taylor & Francis The Open Access version of this book, available at www.tandfebooks.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 license. ISBN-13: 978-0-415-94782-4 (hbk) ISBN-13: 978-0-415-94783-1 (pbk) Library of Congress Card Number 2005012589 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Eckstein, Barbara J. Sustaining New Orleans : literature, local memory, and the fate of a city / Barbara Eckstein. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-415-94782-0 (alk. paper) -- ISBN 0-415-94783-9 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. American literature--Louisiana--New Orleans--History and criticism. 2. New Orleans (La.)-- Intellectual life. 3. New Orleans (La.)--In literature. 4. New Orleans (La.)--Civilization. I. Title. PS267.N49E27 2005 810.9'9763--dc22 2005012589 Visit the Taylor & Francis Web site at http://www.taylorandfrancis.com Taylor & Francis Group and the Routledge Web site at is the Academic Division of T&F Informa plc. http://www.routledge-ny.com For Robert Udick, 1957–1999, and Jim Knudsen, 1950–2004, friends of New Orleans and friends of mine. This page intentionally left blank Contents Preface xi 1 The Claims for New Orleans’s Exceptionalism 1 2 “Indiscourageable Progress”: The Decline of the New Orleans Streetcar and the Rise of A Streetcar Named Desire 31 3 Sex and the Historic City: A Walking Tour on the Wild Side 65 4 Malaise and Miasms: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 12/16/2016 "See News Release 076 for Any Concurrences And/Or Dissents."
    12/16/2016 "See News Release 076 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA No. 16-KP-0234 STATE OF LOUISIANA v. ROGERS LACAZE On Supervisory Writ from the Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans PER CURIAM: Writ denied. The Fourth Circuit correctly reversed the district court’s order for a new trial. In 1995, an Orleans Parish jury found Rogers LaCaze, and separately, co- defendant Antoinette Frank, guilty of three counts of first degree murder for the March 4, 1995 armed robbery and triple homicide of siblings Cuong Vu and Ha Vu, employees of the family-owned Kim Anh Vietnamese restaurant in New Orleans East, and New Orleans Police Officer Ronnie Williams, who was at the time working a paid security detail at the restaurant. Antoinette Frank (“Frank”), herself a New Orleans Police Officer, was Ofc. Williams’s former partner and sometimes also worked security at the restaurant. After finding LaCaze guilty as charged on all three counts, jurors unanimously voted to impose the death sentence. This Court affirmed his convictions and sentence. State v. LaCaze, 99-0584 (La. 1/25/02), 824 So.2d 1063, cert. denied, LaCaze v. Louisiana, 537 U.S. 865, 123 S.Ct. 263, 154 L.Ed.2d 110 (2002). The state’s case was premised on the survivors’ identifications of both LaCaze and Frank, in addition to other evidence which showed, inter alia, that after Frank met LaCaze in November 1994, the pair established a routine of acting in concert while Frank was on duty, with LaCaze accompanying her as she responded to calls.
    [Show full text]
  • Ÿþa M E R I C a N R E N a I S S a N C E , O C T O B E R 2 0
    American Renaissance There is not a truth existing which I fear or would wish unknown to the whole world. — Thomas Jefferson Vol. 16 No. 10 October 2005 Africa in Our Midst The media suppress Katri- day, Aug. 29. The levees broke on Tues- heads dispelled that view. day and the city began to flood. Before The day after the hurricane, a reporter na’s lessons. long, 80 percent of New Orleans was caught the atmosphere of high-spirited under as much as 20 feet of water. chaos at a Wal-Mart in the Lower Gar- by Jared Taylor The city’s 70,000-seat football sta- den District. People were grabbing dium, known as the Superdome, had things as quickly as they could, smash- n the aftermath of Hurricane ing open jewelry cabinets and Katrina, which blasted the scooping up double-handfuls. One IGulf Coast on Aug. 29, the man packed his van so full of elec- entire world saw images that left tronic equipment he could not no doubt that what is repeatedly close the rear doors. A teenage girl called the sole remaining super- passed out, face down, and people power can be reduced to squalor stepped on her. A man stopped to and chaos nearly as gruesome as roll her onto her back, and she anything found in the Third vomited pink liquid. “This is World. The weather—a Category f***ed up,” he said, and rolled her 4 hurricane—certainly had some- back on her stomach. An NBC cor- thing to do with it, but the most respondent filmed black, uni- serious damage was done not by formed police officers strolling nature but by man.
    [Show full text]
  • Closing Argument in Post-Conviction Hearing
    1 The exhibits, I believe, have all been 2 admitted and received, and, urn, to the extent that, 3 ah, you know, I may not have officially ruled, they 4 are now admitted and received subject to objections 5 that were stated at the time. 6 Do you have a rebuttal case or anything you 7 wish to put on to rebut anything they've argued or 8 submitted? 9 MS. TAPLIN: 10 No, your Honor. 11 THE COURT: 12 All right. Do you want to make an argument? 13 MS. TAPLIN: 14 Sorry. One clarification. Did you just 15 submit S-14 or 16 MR. PICKETT: 17 S-14 was re-numbered. It's not the conduct 18 report. 19 MS. TAPLIN: 20 Okay. Thank you. 21 MR. PICKETT: 22 There's a new S-14, which is the FAX 23 transmittal sheet. 24 THE COURT: 25 All right. Now, do you want to make an 26 argument? 27 MS. TAPLIN: 28 Yes, your Honor. 29 THE COURT: 30 All right. 31 MS. TAPLIN: 32 In a first-degree murder case involving the 53 1 execution of a New Orleans police officer and two 2 other individuals in which a young African-American 3 man is accused possibly in a notorious case in a 4 notorious decade, this teenager was represented by 5 a lawyer who didn't even know how to pick a fair 6 and impartial jury. He admitted as much in court 7 when he allowed someone not even connected with 8 this case to take over voir dire for him.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Nicholls Football Media Guide
    2012 SCHEDULE * denotes SLC game • BOLD denotes HOME GAME 9/1/2012 2 P.M. • OREGON STATE Band CORVALLIS, ORE. 9/8/2012 4 P.M. • SOUTH ALABAMA _-of MOBILE, ALA. - 9/15/2012 6 P.M. • TULSA _ TULSA, OKLA. Brothers 9/22/2012 6 P.M. • EVANGEL HALL OF FAME GAME • THIBODAUX, LA. 10/6/2012 6 P.M. • CENTRAL ARKANSAS* CONWAY, ARK. 10/13/2012 6 P.M. • SAM HOUSTON STATE* HOMECOMING• THIBODAUX, LA. 10/20/2012 2 P.M. • STEPHEN F. AUSTIN* NACOGDOCHES, TEXAS 10/27/2012 6 P.M. • NORTHWESTERN STATE* NATCHITOCHES, LA. 11/3/2012 3 P.M. • MCNEESE STATE* FAMILY DAY • THIBODAUX, LA. 11/10/2012 3 P.M. • LAMAR* BEAUMONT, TEXAS 11/15/2012 6 P.M. • SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA* THIBODAUX, LA. 2012 NICHOLLS FOOTBALL MEDIA GUIDE Table of Contents 2012 OUTLOOK SOUTHLAND CONFERENCE Quick Facts......................................2 Southland Bio ................................46 Season Outlook ...............................3 Members/Map................................47 Position Breakdown .........................4 All-Time Standings ........................49 Depth Chart .....................................7 2011 Stats ......................................50 Roster ..............................................8 2012 Opponents ............................10 HISTORY All-Time Series Records ................52 PLAYERS Individual Records .........................55 Biographies....................................13 Team Records ...............................57 Season Leaders ............................58 Career Leaders..............................60 COACHES Accolades ......................................61
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of LOUISIANA V. ANTOINETTE FRANK (Parish of Orleans) (First Degree Murder) Defendant’S Conviction Was Previously Affirmed
    FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE # 34 FROM : CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 22nd day of May, 2007, are as follows: BY: KIMBALL, J. 1999-KA-0553 STATE OF LOUISIANA v. ANTOINETTE FRANK (Parish of Orleans) (First Degree Murder) Defendant’s conviction was previously affirmed. State v. Frank, 99- 0553 (La. 1/17/01), 803 So.2d 1. For the reasons assigned herein, defendant’s sentence is affirmed. In the event this judgment becomes final on direct review when either: (1) the defendant fails to petition timely the United States Supreme Court for certiorari; or (2) that Court denies her petition for certiorari; and either (a) the defendant, having filed for and been denied certiorari, fails to petition the United States Supreme Court timely, under its prevailing rules for rehearing of denial of certiorari, or (b) that Court denies her petition for rehearing, the trial judge shall, upon receiving notice from this court under LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 923 of finality on direct appeal, and before signing the warrant of execution, as provided by LSA-R.S. 15:567(B), immediately notify the Louisiana Indigent Defense Assistance Board and provide the Board with reasonable time in which: (1) to enroll counsel to represent the defendant in any state post- conviction proceedings, if appropriate, pursuant to its authority under LSA-R.S. 15:149.1; and (2) to litigate expeditiously the claims raised in that original application, if filed, in the state courts. CALOGERO, C.J., dissents and assigns reasons. JOHNSON, J., dissents for reasons assigned by Calogero, C.J.
    [Show full text]
  • ALABAMA ALABAMA Name Age Nationality Photo
    Stolen Lives: Killed by Law Enforcement ALABAMA ALABAMA Name Age Nationality Photo Donald Nabors — Black August 3, 1998. Talladega: Mr. Nabors was shot to death by a white police officer. Authorities refuse to identify the officer or divulge the circumstances surrounding the shooting. On Aug. 17, several hundred Black residents held a protest at city hall to demand justice. Source: Yahoo!/States News Service, 8/17/98 Calvin Moore 18 — February 21, 1996. Kilby Correctional Facility: Mr. Moore was serving a two-year sentence for a burglary conviction. He weighed about 160 pounds on Jan. 26, 1996. When he died less than a month later, he weighed 110 pounds. He had lost 56 pounds in less than a month and suffered symptoms of severe mental illness as well as dehydration and starvation after entering the prison. Despite the fact that Calvin was often unable to walk or talk and spent days lying on the concrete floor of his cell in a pool of his own urine, nurses repeatedly failed to provide basic medical care. Not even his vital signs were recorded for the last nine days of his life. An official state autopsy, which concluded that he died of “natural causes,” was called a “whitewash” by an internationally renowned expert on forensic medicine. The expert said Calvin’s death was “a homicide resulting from criminal negligence.” The prison’s health-care provider, Correctional Medical Services (CMS), said, “It is clear the health care staff provided appropriate and compassionate care.” Calvin Moore’s father sued CMS and seven medical professionals, including nurses and doctors, charging malpractice and negligence.
    [Show full text]
  • Making of a Second-Class Citizen: a Case Study of the Institutionalized
    The College of Wooster Libraries Open Works Senior Independent Study Theses 2012 Making of a Second-Class Citizen: a Case Study of the Institutionalized Oppression of Blacks in New Orleans Andrew Stowe The College of Wooster, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://openworks.wooster.edu/independentstudy Part of the African American Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Stowe, Andrew, "Making of a Second-Class Citizen: a Case Study of the Institutionalized Oppression of Blacks in New Orleans" (2012). Senior Independent Study Theses. Paper 3855. https://openworks.wooster.edu/independentstudy/3855 This Senior Independent Study Thesis Exemplar is brought to you by Open Works, a service of The oC llege of Wooster Libraries. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Independent Study Theses by an authorized administrator of Open Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Copyright 2012 Andrew Stowe The College of Wooster The Making of a Second-Class Citizen: A Case Study of the Institutionalized Oppression of Blacks in New Orleans by Andrew Stowe Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of Senior Independent Study Advised by: Dr. Ibra Sene History Department Spring 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements i List of Figures ii Introduction 1 Chapter 1: A Colonial City Built by Slaves 10 Chapter 2: Flooding, Yellow Fever Epidemics, and Post-Civil War New Orleans 18 Chapter 3: Segregation and Police Brutality during the Civil Rights Movement 29 Chapter 4: Reformation in the NOPD and Environmental Injustice in the 20th Century 45 Conclusion 62 Annotated Bibliography 64 Acknowledgements I would like to start off thanking my parents who not only funded my education but also acted as mentors when I was struggling, advisors when I need guidance and parents when I needed a little extra loving.
    [Show full text]
  • The Murder Trial of Shareef Cousin
    The Murder Trial of Shareef Cousin Overview The murder was shocking, even in a city recently pro claimed the murder capital of the United States. For their first date, Michael Gerardi gave Connie Babin a single red rose and took her out to dinner at the Port of Call restau rant on the edge of New Orleans’ historic French Quar ter. As they were returning to his truck, parked a block away, they were confronted by three African American youths. Before Gerardi had a chance to hand over his wallet, he was shot in the face. A part-time bartender, who was also a medical student, provided emergency first aid but to no avail. Michael Gerardi was killed dur ing what became known as New Orleans’ bloodiest week. Acting on an anonymous tip, New Orleans Police Department detectives arrested Shareef Cousin at his home just a few blocks from where Michael Gerardi had been slain. Nine months later the case went to trial. The state’s star witness was Connie Babin, the victim’s date, who identified Cousin as the attacker. The defense countered with an alibi contending that Cousin was playing basketball about the time of the shooting. Amid intense local media coverage, the majority African American jury convicted Shareef Cousin of first-degree murder and sentenced him to death. National atten tion soon focused on the case as well. Shareef Cousin became a poster child for the anti–death penalty move ment; he was only 16 at the time of the murder and thus garnered the dubious distinction of being one of the youngest people on America’s death row.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE John C. Kilburn Jr. EDUCATION B.A. Sociology
    CURRICULUM VITAE John C. Kilburn Jr. EDUCATION B.A. Sociology. University of New Orleans. December, 1987. M.A. Sociology. Louisiana State University. May, 1992. Ph.D. Sociology. Louisiana State University. August, 1996. Dissertation: Security and Rational Choice: Household, Community, and Public Provision. Advisor: Wesley M. Shrum EMPLOYMENT 2009-present Professor of Sociology & Criminal Justice Extramural Associate for Office of Sponsored Research Department of Behavioral Sciences Texas A & M International University Laredo, Texas 2005 – 2008 Associate Professor & Department Chair Department of Behavioral, Applied Sciences & Criminal Justice Texas A & M International University Laredo, Texas 2002-2004 Associate Professor (chair January-December 2004) Department of Sociology, Anthropology & Social Work Eastern Connecticut State University Willimantic, Connecticut 1997 - 2002 Assistant Professor (coordinator of Criminal Justice and Criminology from 1997-2001) Department of Sociology, Anthropology & Social Work Eastern Connecticut State University Willimantic, Connecticut 1994-1997 Visiting Assistant Professor Department of Social Sciences Our Lady of the Lake College Baton Rouge, Louisiana COURSES TAUGHT Taught 18 different courses at LSU, Our Lady of the Lake College, Eastern Connecticut State University and Texas A & M International either as Sociology, Criminology or interdisciplinary. SPONSORED STUDENT RESEARCH PRESENTATIONS Sponsored twenty student presentations at various conferences. GRANTS & CONTRACTS 2009-2014 Principal Investigator (with Co-PI – Jeff Brown) National Institutes of Health, Extramural Associates Research Development Award. $ 474,944 over 5 years from the National Institutes of Health. 2008-2012 “Transmission of Tacit Skills in East Asian graduate Science Programs.” Co-PI (with PI – Marcus Ynalvez, other Co-PI’s: Ruby Ynalvez and Noriko Hara of Indiana University) $ 385,356 over 3 years from the National Science Foundation.
    [Show full text]