Arxiv:2103.02780V2 [Math.AG] 29 Mar 2021 Aite.I Rdcsta Vr Rjcievariety Projective Every That Predicts It Varieties
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
TOWARDS CLASSIFICATION OF CODIMENSION 1 FOLIATIONS ON THREEFOLDS OF GENERAL TYPE ALEKSEI GOLOTA Abstract. We aim to classify codimension 1 foliations F with canonical singularities and ν(KF ) < 3 on threefolds of general type. We prove a classification result for foliations satisfying these conditions and having non-trivial algebraic part. We also describe purely transcendental foliations F with the canonical class KF being not big on manifolds of general type in any dimension, assuming that F is non-singular in codimension 2. 1. Introduction The Minimal Model Program (MMP) is one of the main guiding principles in the study of algebraic varieties. It predicts that every projective variety X with mild singularities should have a birational model ′ X which is also mildly singular and either has KX′ nef (minimal model) or admits a Mori fiber space. So, informally speaking, all algebraic varieties should be constructed, using birational equivalences and fibrations, from those of the three classes: KX positive (general type), KX numerically trivial (Calabi– Yau) and KX negative (Fano). The works of Brunella [Bru97, Bru03, Bru15], Mendes [Men00] and McQuillan [McQ08] established a version of the MMP for holomorphic foliations on surfaces. Analogously to the case of varieties, for a foliation F with mild singularities it is possible to define the canonical class KF and its invariants such as Kodaira and numerical dimension. Foliations on surfaces admit a classification according to these invariants; moreover, this classification is rather explicit for foliations “not of general type”. The final step in the classification of minimal models of foliations on surfaces is the following theorem (see [Bru03, Theorem on p. 122] and [McQ08, Section IV.5]). Theorem 1.1. Let F be a foliation with reduced singularities on a surface S of general type. Suppose that KF is nef and not big. Then either (1) F is algebraically integrable and induced by an isotrivial fibration, κ(KF )= ν(KF )=1; (2) F is transcendental and the pair (S, F ) is isomorphic to a Hilbert modular surface with a Hilbert modular foliation, κ(KF )= −∞, ν(KF )=1. The setting of the above theorem is interesting from several points of view. It involves the interplay between positivity of KX and KF (see e.g. [CP15, CP19] for related topics); the failure of abundance for foliations (see [McQ08, Tou16]). Another context, in which these foliations appear, is the study of Kobayashi hyperbolicity (see e.g. [Kob70, Dem97]). Entire curves tangent to foliations on surfaces have arXiv:2103.02780v2 [math.AG] 29 Mar 2021 been studied in connection with the Green–Griffiths conjecture (see [McQ98, Bru99, DR15]). In higher dimensions we have, for example, the following theorem [GPR13, Theorem F]. Theorem 1.2. Let F be a codimension one foliation with canonical singularities on a projective threefold X. Suppose that there exists a generically nondegenerate meromorphic map f : C2 99K X such that the image f(C2) is Zariski-dense in X and tangent to F . Then the canonical class of F is not big. Recently, in a series of works [Spi20, CS18, SS19] the MMP for codimension 1 foliations on threefolds has been established. Moreover, some structure theorems for codimension 1 foliations are known in higher dimensions, for example in the case KF ≡ 0 [LPT18, Dru18] or −KF ample [AD13, AD17, AD17b]. These results suggest that the MMP-type classification for codimension 1 foliations should hold in any dimension. Motivated by the above results, we would like to describe codimension 1 foliations F with canonical singularities and ν(KF ) < 3 on threefolds of general type. In this paper we are able to prove the following partial analogue of Theorem 1.1. 1 2 ALEKSEI GOLOTA Theorem (A). Let F be a codimension one foliation with canonical singularities on a threefold X of general type. Suppose that KF is not big and the algebraic rank ra(F ) is positive. Then one of the following two cases occurs. (1) F is algebraically integrable. Then, up to a generically finite morphism, the threefold X splits as a product S × C of a surface S and a curve C, and F is the relative tangent bundle of the projection S × C → C. We have κ(KF )= ν(KF )=2. (2) The algebraic rank of F is equal to 1. Then, up to a generically finite morphism, the threefold X splits as a product S × C of a Hilbert modular surface S and a curve C, and F is the pullback via the projection S × C → S of a Hilbert modular foliation G on S. We have κ(KF ) = −∞ and ν(KF )=2. At the moment we do not know how to classify purely transcendental foliations with canonical sin- gularities and not of general type on threefolds of general type. However, if we restrict ourselves to foliations regular in codimension 2, then we are able to prove a result which confirms our expectations. The starting point for us is another remarkable theorem by Brunella (see [Bru97, pp. 587-588]). Theorem 1.3. Let F be a regular foliation on a minimal surface X of general type. Then the conormal ∗ bundle NF is pseudoeffective (even numerically effective). This theorem essentially follows from Baum–Bott formula, Riemann–Roch theorem and intersection theory. Assuming that F is non-singular in codimension 2, we use the Baum–Bott formula and inter- section computations in a similar way to study purely transcendental foliations in higher dimensions. Together with Lefschetz-type theorems, it allows us to “lift” positivity of the conormal bundle from hyperplane sections. Then we use classification results of Touzet [Tou13, Tou16] to describe foliations from this class. Theorem (B). Let X be a smooth projective manifold of general type, dim(X) = n > 2. Let F be a codimension 1 foliation on X. Suppose that (1) KF is not big; (2) F is purely transcendental; (3) codimX Sing(F ) > 3. Then the foliation F is induced by a Hilbert modular foliation via a morphism X → MH , generically finite onto its image. Our paper is organized as follows. In section 2 we gather the information on Kodaira and numerical dimensions for Q-divisors, basic notions from foliation theory and foliated birational geometry. In section 3 we recall some important definitions and results concerning fibrations with fibers of general type. Then we use these results to prove Theorem (A), see Proposition 3.9 and Theorem 3.10 below. In section 4 we prove Theorem (B) (see Theorem 4.1) and pose some questions for future research. Acknowledgements. This paper is a part of a project on hyperbolicity and foliations we have been working on for a long time. We would like to thank our advisor Constantin Shramov for encouraging us to write down these results. We also thank Jorge Vitório Pereira, Erwan Rousseau, Jean-Pierre Demailly, Misha Verbitsky and Vladimir Lazić for very helpful discussions on various topics related to this work. 2. Preliminaries 2.1. Kodaira and numerical dimensions. In this subsection we recall the notions of Kodaira and numerical dimension for Q-divisors. Definition 2.1. Let D be a Q-divisor on a normal projective variety X. The Kodaira dimension (or Kodaira–Iitaka dimension) of D is defined as 0 h (X, OX (⌊mD⌋) κ(X,D) = max{k | lim sup k > 0} m→∞ m 0 if h (X, OX (⌊mD⌋)) > 0 for some m and κ(X,D)= −∞ otherwise. TOWARDS CLASSIFICATION OF CODIMENSION 1 FOLIATIONS ON THREEFOLDS OF GENERAL TYPE 3 Definition 2.2. Let X be a normal projective variety, D an Q-divisor on X and A an ample divisor. We define the quantity 0 h (X, OX (⌊mD⌋ + A)) ν(D, A) = max k ∈ Z>0 | lim sup k > 0 . m→∞ m The numerical dimension of D is defined to be ν(D) = max{ν(D, A) | A ample}. If D is not pseudoeffective then we set ν(D)= −∞. The main property of ν(D) is that it depends only on the numerical class of a divisor. Proposition 2.3. We have the following basic properties of Kodaira and numerical dimensions (see [Nak04, Lemma II.3.11, Proposition III.5.7] and [Nak04, Sec. V] for proofs). (1) We have κ(X,D) 6 ν(X,D) 6 n for any Q-divisor D; (2) For a nef Q-divisor D we have ν(X,D) = max{k | Dk · An−k 6=0} (3) If D and E are pseudoeffective Q-divisors then ν(D + E) > max{ν(D), ν(E)}; (4) If f : Y → X is a surjective morphism then κ(Y,f ∗D)= κ(X,D) and ν(Y,f ∗D)= ν(X,D). (5) If ϕ: X → X is a birational morphism and D is a Q-divisor on X then e κ(X,D)= κ(X, ϕ∗D + E) and ν(X,D)= ν(X, ϕ∗D + E) for any effective ϕ-exceptionale Q-divisor E. e We also recall the notion of movable intersection product for pseudoeffective classes from [BDPP13] (see also [Leh13, Sec. 4]). Theorem 2.4. Let X be a smooth projective variety of dimension n. Denote by E the cone of pseudo- effective (1, 1)-classes on X. Then for every k ∈{1,...,n} there exists a map k k,k Ei → H>0 (X, R), (L1,L2,...,Lk) → hL1 · L2 · · · Lki iY=1 called the movable intersection product, such that the following properties hold. (1) We have vol(L)= hLin; (2) The movable intersection product is increasing. homogeneous of degree 1 and superadditive in each variable: hL1 · · · (M + N) · · · Lki > hL1 · · · M · · · Lki + hL1 · · · N · · · Lki. (3) For k =1 the movable intersection product gives a divisorial Zariski decomposition: L = PL + NL where PL = hLi is nef in codimension 1.