DOCSLIB.ORG

Oceano Dunes SVRA Dust Control Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Oceano Dunes SVRA Dust Control Program Oceano Dunes SVRA Dust Control Program DRAFT PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VOLUME 1 State Clearinghouse # 2012121008 July 2016 Oceano Dunes SVRA Dust Control Program DRAFT PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VOLUME 1 State Clearinghouse # 2012121008 July 2016 Prepared for: State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation (OHMVR) Division 1725 23rd Street, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95816 (916) 324-4442 www.ohv.parks.ca.gov Prepared by: MIG | TRA Environmental Sciences, Inc. 2635 North First Street, Suite 149 San Jose, CA 95134 (650) 327-0429 www.traenviro.com | www.migcom.com Table of Contents Page i OCEANO DUNES SVRA DUST CONTROL PROGRAM DRAFT PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VOL. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS S.0 Summary .................................................................................................................... 1 S.1 Project Description...................................................................................................... 1 S.1.1 Program Area .............................................................................................................. 1 S.1.1.1 Proposed Activities in the Program Area ................................................................. 1 S.1.1.2 Project Duration and Schedule ................................................................................. 2 S.1.1.3 Dust Control Program Implementation Scenarios ................................................... 2 S.1.1.4 Proposed Annual Review Process ............................................................................ 3 S.1.2 Significant Impacts and Mitigation Measures ............................................................ 3 S.1.3 Alternatives to the Proposed Project ........................................................................... 7 S.1.3.1 Alternatives Considered and Rejected ..................................................................... 7 S.1.3.2 No Project Alternative.............................................................................................. 7 S.1.3.3 Alternate Dust Control Program .............................................................................. 8 S.1.3.4 Environmentally Superior Alternative ..................................................................... 9 S.1.4 Known Areas of Controversy ..................................................................................... 9 Chapter 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Dust Control Program Overview and Background Information .............................. 1-1 1.1.1 Saltation and Dust Generation at Oceano Dunes SVRA ......................................... 1-3 1.1.2 Particulate Matter Monitoring Downwind of Oceano Dunes SVRA ...................... 1-4 1.1.3 Dust and PM Studies at Oceano Dunes SVRA ........................................................ 1-5 1.1.4 SLOAPCD Rule 1001 (Coastal Dunes Dust Control Requirements) ...................... 1-7 1.1.4.1 Rule 1001 Settlement Agreement ................................................................... 1-10 1.2 Lead Agency Information ...................................................................................... 1-10 1.3 Type of EIR ............................................................................................................ 1-10 1.4 Intended Uses of this Program EIR ........................................................................ 1-11 1.4.1 Responsible, Trustee, and Interested Agency Approvals ...................................... 1-11 1.4.2 Master Coastal Development Permit ..................................................................... 1-12 1.5 EIR Scoping Information ....................................................................................... 1-12 1.5.1 Notice of Preparation of an EIR ............................................................................. 1-12 1.5.2 Public Scoping Meeting ......................................................................................... 1-12 1.5.3 Native American Consultation ............................................................................... 1-13 1.5.4 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service / California Department of Fish and Wildlife Coordination ............................................................................................ 1-13 1.5.5 EIR Scope and Content .......................................................................................... 1-13 1.6 References .............................................................................................................. 1-13 Chapter 2 Project Description ................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Dust Control Program Objectives ............................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Oceano Dunes SVRA Overview .............................................................................. 2-2 2.2.1 Location and Access ................................................................................................ 2-2 2.2.2 Dune Setting............................................................................................................. 2-4 2.2.3 Surrounding Land Use ............................................................................................. 2-5 2.2.4 Recreational Opportunities ...................................................................................... 2-6 2.2.4.1 Recreational History .......................................................................................... 2-8 Oceano Dunes SVRA Dust Control Program Draft Program EIR, Vol. 1 – July 2016 California Department of Parks and Recreation, Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation Division Page ii Table of Contents 2.2.4.2 Coastal Development Permit 4-82-300 ............................................................. 2-8 2.2.4.3 Existing Vehicular Recreation .......................................................................... 2-9 2.2.4.4 Existing Non-Vehicular Recreation ................................................................ 2-10 2.2.5 Visitation Levels .................................................................................................... 2-10 2.2.6 Natural and Cultural Resources Management Activities ....................................... 2-10 2.2.6.1 Vegetation / Dune Restoration ........................................................................ 2-10 2.2.6.2 Wildlife Habitat Protection ............................................................................. 2-11 2.2.6.3 Cultural Resources Protection ......................................................................... 2-13 2.2.7 Ongoing and Completed Dust Control Activities .................................................. 2-13 2.2.7.1 Ongoing Grand Avenue, Pier Avenue, and Strand Way Sand Management .. 2-13 2.2.7.2 Ongoing Street Sweeping Program ................................................................. 2-15 2.2.7.3 Ongoing Dust and Meteorological Monitoring ............................................... 2-15 2.2.7.4 Completed Dust Control Projects .................................................................... 2-15 2.3 Proposed Dust Control Program Description ......................................................... 2-17 2.3.1 Proposed Dust Control Program Area ................................................................... 2-18 2.3.1.1 Basis for Dust Control Program Area ............................................................. 2-18 2.3.1.2 City of Grover Beach (Grand Avenue) and Oceano (Pier Avenue) ................ 2-20 2.3.1.3 Private Lands Downwind of Oceano Dunes SVRA........................................ 2-20 2.3.2 Proposed Dust Control Measure Descriptions ....................................................... 2-20 2.3.2.1 Vegetation Planting ......................................................................................... 2-20 2.3.2.2 Deployment of Seasonal Dust Control Measures ........................................... 2-22 2.3.2.3 Tree Plantings .................................................................................................. 2-22 2.3.2.4 Pilot and Demonstration Projects .................................................................... 2-23 2.3.2.5 Dust and Meteorological Monitoring .............................................................. 2-23 2.3.2.6 Track-Out Prevention ...................................................................................... 2-24 2.3.3 Dust Control Measure Siting Considerations ........................................................ 2-25 2.3.4 Dust Control Program Implementation Scenarios ................................................. 2-28 2.3.4.1 Preferred Dust Control Program Scenario ...................................................... 2-31 2.3.4.2 Alternate Dust Control Program Scenario ...................................................... 2-31 2.4 Schedule of Activities ............................................................................................ 2-31 2.4.1 Dust Control Program Annual Review .................................................................. 2-31 2.5 Standard and Specific Requirements Incorporated into the Dust Control Program ............................................................................................ 2-35 2.6 Permits and Approvals Required by the Project ...................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • S Best Beaches South of San Francisco
    California’s Best Beaches South of San Francisco Author’s Note: This article “California’s Best Beaches South of San Francisco” is one of 30 chapters in my book/ebook Northern California Travel: The Best Options. That book is available in English as a book/ebook and also as an ebook in Chinese. Several of my books on California can be seen on myAmazon Author Page. See also my companion article “California’s Best Beaches North of San Francisco.” By Lee Foster If headed south from San Francisco on CA Highway 1, which are the loveliest beaches at which to linger? Here are my suggestions: Montara Beach, 10 miles south Montara Beach offers a classic beach experience and is my favorite in this region. You park on a bluff overlooking the south end of the beach. Stretching in front of you are a couple miles of sand, going north. The lookout is inviting. The beach is wide and welcoming. The surf is crashing. In the hours before sunset a golden glow from the west settles on the beach and cliffs behind it. Gingerly descend the stairs to the beach. The stairs get wiped out from time to time by storms. But then they get rebuilt. Walk north along the beach. Admire the thunderous surf. Gulp in the fresh air. Accept the glow of the sun from the west. Indulge in a near-wilderness experience, yet very close to San Francisco. A very few other people will be frolicking on the beach, perhaps with their dogs fetching sticks in the surf.
    [Show full text]
  • Map Showing Seacliff Response to Climatic And
    MISCELLANEOUS FIELD STUDIES MF-2399 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY C A 123 122 30' 122 LI 38 FO Table 1. Linear extent of cliff section experiencing slope failure for each of the time periods investigated. The data is further subdivided to Concord Map RN show the type of slope failure for each occurrence, as well as the geologic units involved, if distinguishable. Area INTRODUCTION I A The coastal cliffs along much of the central California coast are actively retreating. Large storms and periodic GULF OF THE earthquakes are responsible for most of the documented seacliff slope failures. Long-term average erosion rates calculated for FARALLONES Debris Debris this section of coast (Moore and others, 1999) do not provide the spatial or temporal data resolution necessary to identify the Time Interval BlBlock k OthOther TtTotalll along-cliffliff NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY Oakland processes responsible for retreat of the seacliffs, where episodic retreat threatens homes and community infrastructure. falls flows Slumps (m) Slaking (m) San fll(falls (m) ) ()(m) filfailure per itinterval l Francisco Research suggests that more erosion occurs along the California coast over a short time scale, during periods of severe storms (m) (m) Farallon or seismic activity, than occurs during decades of normal weather or seismic quiescence (Griggs and Scholar, 1998; Griggs, Islands 1994; Plant and Griggs, 1990; Griggs and Johnson, 1979 and 1983; Kuhn and Shepard, 1979). Livermore This is the second map in a series of maps documenting the processes of short-term seacliff retreat through the 0 130130.5 5 113113.4 4 identification of slope failure styles, spatial variability of failures, and temporal variation in retreat amounts in an area that has --------- 0 0 ------------- 0 0 243.9 Pacifica (i(instantaneous) t t ) been identified as an erosion hotspot (Moore and others, 1999; Griggs and Savoy, 1985).
    [Show full text]
  • Pitch Canker Kills Pines, Spreads to New Species and Regions
    Pitch canker kills pines, Page 1 of 8 Return to Previous Page Pitch canker kills pines, spreads to new species and regions Andrew J. Storer o Thomas R. Gordon o Paul L. Dallara o David L. Wood California Agriculture, Vol. 48, No. 6, pages 9-13 The host and geographic range of the pitch canker pathogen has greatly increased since it was first discovered in California in 1986. Most significantly, it now affects many pine species, including native stands of Monterey pine, and has made a transgeneric jump to Douglas fir. Isolated occurrences of the disease have been found as far north as Mendocino County. Insects are strongly implicated as vectors of the pathogen, and long term management appears to be dependent on the development of resistant tree varieties. In infested regions, the planting of Monterey pine and other pine tree species should be undertaken with caution. Pitch canker disease was first identified in California at New Brighton State Beach, Santa Cruz County, in 1986. By the beginning of 1992, it was recorded as far north as San Francisco and as far south as San Diego County. Most records were from Monterey pine, but occasional infections of bishop, Coulter, Italian stone, Aleppo, ponderosa and Canary Island pine were reported. The most extensive infestations were in Santa Cruz and southern Alameda counties. In Southern California, with the exception of an isolated infestation in Santa Barbara County, only Monterey pine Christmas tree plantations were affected. Pitch canker disease, caused by the fungus Fusarium subglutinans f. sp. pini, is characterized by a resinous exudation on the surface of Trees with advanced pich canker symptoms have significant crown shoots, branches, exposed roots and boles of dieback due to the large number of infested trees.
    [Show full text]
  • RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile
    RV sites in the United States This GPS POI file is available here: https://poidirectory.com/poifiles/united_states/accommodation/RV_MH-US.html Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile Camp Map 370 Lakeside Park Map 5 Star RV Map 566 Piney Creek Horse Camp Map 7 Oaks RV Park Map 8th and Bridge RV Map A AAA RV Map A and A Mesa Verde RV Map A H Hogue Map A H Stephens Historic Park Map A J Jolly County Park Map A Mountain Top RV Map A-Bar-A RV/CG Map A. W. Jack Morgan County Par Map A.W. Marion State Park Map Abbeville RV Park Map Abbott Map Abbott Creek (Abbott Butte) Map Abilene State Park Map Abita Springs RV Resort (Oce Map Abram Rutt City Park Map Acadia National Parks Map Acadiana Park Map Ace RV Park Map Ackerman Map Ackley Creek Co Park Map Ackley Lake State Park Map Acorn East Map Acorn Valley Map Acorn West Map Ada Lake Map Adam County Fairgrounds Map Adams City CG Map Adams County Regional Park Map Adams Fork Map Page 1 Location Map Adams Grove Map Adelaide Map Adirondack Gateway Campgroun Map Admiralty RV and Resort Map Adolph Thomae Jr. County Par Map Adrian City CG Map Aerie Crag Map Aeroplane Mesa Map Afton Canyon Map Afton Landing Map Agate Beach Map Agnew Meadows Map Agricenter RV Park Map Agua Caliente County Park Map Agua Piedra Map Aguirre Spring Map Ahart Map Ahtanum State Forest Map Aiken State Park Map Aikens Creek West Map Ainsworth State Park Map Airplane Flat Map Airport Flat Map Airport Lake Park Map Airport Park Map Aitkin Co Campground Map Ajax Country Livin' I-49 RV Map Ajo Arena Map Ajo Community Golf Course Map
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Progress Report Full Version 02 12.Indd
    CALIFORNIA RECREATIONAL TRAILS PLAN Providing Vision and Direction for California Trails Tahoe Rim Trail Tahoe Rim Trail TahoeTTahhoe RRiRimm TrailTTrail Complete Progress Report 2011 California State Parks Planning Division Statewide Trails Section www.parks.ca.gov/trails/trailsplan Message from the Director Th e ability to exercise and enjoy nature in the outdoors is critical to the physical and mental health of California’s population. Trails and greenways provide the facilities for these activities. Our surveys of Californian’s recreational use patterns over the years have shown that our variety of trails, from narrow back-country trails to spacious paved multi-use facilities, provide experiences that attract more users than any other recreational facility in California. Th e increasing population and desire for trails are increasing pressures on the agencies charged with their planning, maintenance and management. As leaders in the planning and management of all types of trail systems, California State Parks is committed to assisting the state’s recreation providers by complying with its legislative mandate of recording the progress of the California Recreational Trails Plan. During the preparation of this progress report, input was received through surveys, two California Recreational Trails Committee public meetings and a session at the 2011 California Trails and Greenways Conference. Preparation of this progress Above: Director Ruth Coleman report included extensive research into the current status of the 27 California Trail Corridors, determining which of these corridors need administrative, funding or planning assistance. Research and public input regarding the Plan’s twelve Goals and their associated Action Guidelines have identifi ed both encouraging progress and areas where more attention is needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Cruz County Parks Strategic Plan Appendix 1
    SANTA CRUZ COUNTY PARKS STRATEGIC PLAN APPENDIX 1 ParkScore® Index for the County of Santa Cruz, California Prepared by the Trust for Public Land November, 2017 As the leading U.S. organization that works to analyze and determine the value of urban parks, The Trust for Public Land has created a methodology to give a general rating of every major U.S. city’s park system through its proprietary program called ParkScore®. Santa Cruz County has a total population of 274,780 in 2017.1 It is located in the mid-coast of California at the north end of the Monterey Bay. The county is 285,522 acres2 making the density a little under 1 person per acre (0.96 people/acre). Of that acreage, 51,776 acres, or 18.1%, of Santa Cruz County are publically accessible parks, parkland, or open space. The county includes four incorporated municipalities. These are the cities of Capitola, Santa Cruz, Scotts Valley, and Watsonville (Table 1). Table 1. Incorporated cities of Santa Cruz County and populations City Population3 Capitola 10,180 Santa Cruz 64,465 Scotts Valley 11,928 Watsonville 53,796 Each of these municipalities operate parks, recreation Table 2. Parks, recreation, and open space amenities provided in facilities, or open space of their own. In addition, there Santa Cruz County are four special recreation and park districts in unincorporated areas that provide different combinations of these services (Table 2). These are independent of city and county governments and are governed by a board of directors.4 Parkland in the unincorporated part of the county is managed by the Santa Cruz County Department of Parks, Open Space, and Cultural Services.
    [Show full text]
  • Seacliff & New Brighton State Beaches
    Our Mission Seacliff & The mission of California State Parks is to provide for the health, inspiration and ong stretches of bluff- education of the people of California by helping L to preserve the state’s extraordinary biological New Brighton diversity, protecting its most valued natural and backed sandy beaches cultural resources, and creating opportunities State Beaches for high-quality outdoor recreation. invite visitors to play on the beach, watch a glorious sunset, or stroll peacefully along the shore. California State Parks supports equal access. Prior to arrival, visitors with disabilities who need assistance should contact the park at (831) 685-6500. If you need this publication in an alternate format, contact [email protected]. CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS P.O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 For information call: (800) 777-0369 (916) 653-6995, outside the U.S. 711, TTY relay service www.parks.ca.gov Seacliff State Beach 201 State Park Drive, Aptos, CA 95003 (831) 685-6500 New Brighton State Beach Park Avenue off Hwy. 1, Capitola, CA 95010 (831) 464-6329 © 2002 California State Parks (Rev. 2016) A t Seacliff State Beach, a thwarting future plans for mile-long expanse of soft sand expansion. Today, the stripped, connects this popular recreation abandoned SS Palo Alto is unsafe spot with New Brighton State Beach, and closed to the public, as is where wooded bluffs provide part of the pier near the ship. unparalleled views of Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary. NEW BRIGHTON STATE BEACH SS Palo Alto In the 1850s, Thomas Fallon AREA HISTORY acquired part of Rancho Soquel years, beachfront camping, picnicking, The Ohlone Indians thrived for thousands and turned it into a resort he named New fishing, and interpretive walks have been of years on the area’s natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.4 Biological Resources
    Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail Network Master Plan EIR Section 4.4 Biological Resources 4.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section addresses biological resources issues related to the proposed MBSST Network project described in Section 2.0, Project Description. A variety of terrestrial and aquatic habitats are present along the three distinct trail reaches (northern, central and Watsonville reaches) of the proposed MBSST Network. The proposed MBSST Network ranges in elevation from sea level to approximately 30 to 40 feet above sea level throughout the corridor. Portions of the proposed project are located within the Coastal Zone of Santa Cruz County. Rincon Consultants, Inc. biologists visited the site on December 3, 11, and 12, 2012 and conducted reconnaissance-level floral and wildlife surveys along the proposed MBSST Network. To support the field investigation, data on biological resources were collected from numerous sources, including relevant literature, maps of natural resources, and data on special- status species and sensitive habitat information obtained from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW, formerly the California Department of Fish and Game), California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) (2003; queried August 2012), the California Native Plant Society online Inventory of Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Plants of California (2012), and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information, Planning and Conservation System (IPaC) (2012b). The USFWS Critical Habitat Mapper (2012a) and National Wetlands Inventory (NWI; 2012c) were also queried. 4.4.1 Setting a. Habitats. The proposed MBSST Network contains 12 habitats mapped by the CDFW California Wildlife Habitat Relationships (CWHR) habitat classification system (Table 4.4-1).
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Northern California's Potential
    Automated Template B: Created by James Nail 2011V2.1 Analysis of Northern California's potential geotourist sites for effective informal geoscience education that address the Earth Science Literacy Initiative's big ideas By Kimberlie Robin Theis A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Mississippi State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Geoscience in the Department of Geosciences, Mississippi State, Mississippi May 2015 Copyright by Kimberlie Robin Theis May 2015 Analysis of Northern California's potential geotourist sites for effective informal geoscience education that address the Earth Science Literacy Initiative's big ideas By Kimberlie Robin Theis Approved: ____________________________________ Renee M. Clary (Major Professor) ____________________________________ John C. Rodgers III (Committee Member) ____________________________________ Darrel W. Schmitz (Committee Member) ____________________________________ Michael E. Brown (Graduate Coordinator) ____________________________________ R.Gregory Dunaway Professor and Dean College of Arts & Sciences Name: Kimberlie Robin Theis Date of Degree:May 9, 2015 Institution: Mississippi State University Major Field: Geoscience Major Professor:Dr. Renee M. Clary Title of Study: Analysis of Northern California's potential geotourist sites for effective informal geoscience education that address the Earth Science Literacy Initiative's big ideas Pages in Study:235 Candidate for Degree of Master of Science Geotourism is becoming more popular and can play a critical role in creating literacy in communities. Moreover, the Big Ideas of the Earth Science Literacy Initiative can be used within signage to address literacy. Because all citizens should have a basic knowledge of Earth Science in order to make informed decisions that relate to Earth Science, geotourism can be used as a way to increase Earth Science knowledge, along with other positive outcomes related to communities' increased well-being.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Venturan Awarded Third Highest DOD Medal
    Does Ventura have enough water? Pages 2&10 Vol. Vol. 3, 12, No. No. 11 14 Published Every Other Published Wednesday Every Other Established Wednesday 2007 April 10 – April March 23, 2019 10 - 23, 2010 “I like seeing results and I like to make people happy whenever possible.” Jim Friedman’s Madhu Bajaj and Dr. Rice enjoyed the talents of Serena Ropersmith, Kelsa Ropersmith and Kamille Kada. new perspective Dennis Cam Kelsch received medal for on serving the 18th Annual Festival of Talent gallantry against an armed enemy. by Amy Brown Local Ventura people Talent is one of the Ventura Unified Beat”, on March 23rd. The show featured School District’s natural resources, as a range of dynamic performances, from by Maryssa Rillo evidenced by this year’s much anticipat- a big production opening act featuring Venturan Jim Friedman served as a member ed Festival of Talent event, “We Got The Continued on page 24 of the Ventura City Council from 1995- awarded third 2002. He also served as mayor in 1998 and 1999. Now, 15 years later, Friedman is back and was reelected in 2018 to highest DOD represent District 5. According to Friedman, money is a Medal bigger issue today than it was the first Ventura native, and 2008 graduate time he served. The break he had from of Ventura High School was presented a serving on the Ventura City Council Silver Star Medal during a ceremony at gave him the opportunity to gain a new the Mighty Eighth Air Force Museum, perspective of the city and see what was Pooler, Georgia on April 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Area Plan
    VENTURA COUNTY GENERAL PLAN COASTAL AREA PLAN Last Amended 9-16-08 Ventura County Planning Division Acknowledgements 1978-1982 Ventura County Board of Supervisors David E. Eaton First District Edwin A. Jones Second District J. K. (Ken) MacDonald Third District James R. Dougherty Fourth District Thomas E. Laubacher, Chairman Fifth District Ventura County Planning Commission Vinette Larson First District Earl Meek Second District Glenn Zogg Third District Curran Cummings, Chairman Fourth District Bernice Lorenzi Fifth District Resource Management Agency Victor R. Husbands, Director Planning Division Dennis T. Davis Manager Kim Hocking, Supervisor, Advanced Planning Jeff Walker, Project Manager Trish Davey, Assistant Planner Jean Melvin, Assistant Planner Kheryn Klubnikin, Assistant Planner This Plan was prepared with financial assistance from the Office of Coastal Zone Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, under provisions of the Federal Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972. For Copies/More Info: To purchase the Ventura County Coastal Area Plan: Call 805/654-2805 or go to the Resource Management Agency receptionist 3rd floor of the Government Center Hall of Administration 800 S. Victoria Avenue, Ventura, CA This Coastal Area Plan is also available on our website: http://www.ventura.org/planning VENTURA COUNTY GENERAL PLAN COASTAL AREA PLAN Ventura County Board of Supervisors California Coastal Commission California Coastal Act of 1976 adopted Plan Adopted - November 18, 1980 California Coastal Act amended, effective January, 1981 Amended - April 14, 1981 Conditionally Certified -August 20, 1981 Amended - March 30, 1982 Certified - June 18, 1982 Amended - October 15, 1985 Certified - February 7, 1986 Amended - December 20, 1988 Certified - May 10, 1989 Amended - June 20, 1989 Certified - October 10 & 12, 1989 Amended - December 11, 1990 Certified - March 15, 1991 Amended - October 19, 1993 Certified - February 16, 1994 Amended - December 10, 1996 Certified - April 10, 1997 Amended - Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 9813 – Ventura County
    Section 9813 – Ventura County 9813 Ventura County (GRA 7)………………………………………………………………………………………. 473 9813.1 Response Summary Tables……………………………………………………………………….. 474 9813.2 Geographic Response Strategies for Environmental Sensitive Sites……………. 478 9813.2.1 GRA 7 Site Index……………………………………………………………………………….. 479 9813.3 Economic Sensitive Sites……………………………………………………………………………. 526 9813.4 Shoreline Operational Divisions………………………………………………………………….. 531 9813 Ventura County (GRA 7) Ventura County GRA 7 begins at the border with Santa Barbara County and extends southeast approximately 40 miles to the border with Los Angeles County. There are thirteen Environmental Sensitive Sites. Most of the shoreline is fine to medium grain sandy beach and rip rap. There are several coastal estuaries and wetlands of varying size with the largest being Mugu Lagoon. Most of the shoreline is exposed except for two large private boat harbors and a commercial/Navy port. LA/LB - ACPs 4/5 473 v. 2019.2 - June 2021 9813.1 Response Summary Tables A summary of the response resources is listed by site and sub-strategy next. LA/LB - ACPs 4/5 474 v. 2019.2 - June 2021 Summary of ACP 4 GRA 7 Response Resources by Site and Sub-Strategy Site Site Name Sub- PREVENTION OBJECTIVE OR CONDITION FOR DEPLOYMENT Strategy Equipment Sub-Type Size/Unit QTY/Unit 4-701 Rincon Creek and Point .1 - Exclude Oil Boom Swamp Boom 200 feet Boom Sorbent Boom 200 feet Vehicle ATV 1 Staff 4 Anchor 8 .2 - Erect Filter Fence Misc. Oil Snare (pom-pom) 600 Misc. Stake Driver 1 Vehicle ATV 1 Fence Construction Fencing 4 x 100 feet 2 Rolls Stakes T-posts 6 feet 20 Staff 4 .3 - Shoreline Pre-Clean: Resource Specialist Supervision Required Staff 5 Vehicle ATV 1 Misc.
    [Show full text]