DOCSLIB.ORG

Results of the Survey on the Vitality of Official-Language Minorities Table of Contents Page

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Results of the Survey on the Vitality of Official-Language Minorities Table of Contents Page Catalogue no. 91-548-X ISBN 978-0-662-47049-6 Minorities Speak Up: Results of the Survey on the Vitality of the Official-Language Minorities 2006 by Jean-Pierre Corbeil, Claude Grenier and Sylvie Lafrenière Demography Division, Main Bldg., room 1708 150 Tunney's Pasture Driveway Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0T6 Telephone: 613-951-2315 Statistics Statistique Canada Canada How to obtain more information For information about this product or the wide range of services and data available from Statistics Canada, visit our website at www.statcan.ca or contact us by e-mail at [email protected] or by telephone from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Monday to Friday: Statistics Canada National Contact Centre Toll-free telephone (Canada and the United States): Inquiries line 1-800-263-1136 National telecommunications device for the hearing impaired 1-800-363-7629 Fax line 1-877-287-4369 Depository Services Program inquiries line 1-800-635-7943 Depository Services Program fax line 1-800-565-7757 Local or international calls: Inquiries line 1-613-951-8116 Fax line 1-613-951-0581 Information to access the product This product, Catalogue no. 91-548-XIE, is available for free in electronic format. To obtain a single issue, visit our website at www.statcan.ca and select “Publications.” Standards of service to the public Statistics Canada is committed to serving its clients in a prompt, reliable and courteous manner. To this end, the Agency has developed standards of service which its employees observe in serving its clients. To obtain a copy of these service standards, please contact Statistics Canada toll free at 1-800-263-1136. The service standards are also published on www.statcan.ca under “About us” > “Providing services to Canadians.” Statistics Canada Demography Division Minorities Speak Up: Results of the Survey on the Vitality of the Official-Language Minorities 2006 Published by authority of the Minister responsible for Statistics Canada © Minister of Industry, 2007 All rights reserved. The content of this electronic publication may be reproduced, in whole or in part, and by any means, without further permission from Statistics Canada, subject to the following conditions: that it be done solely for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, review or newspaper summary, and/or for non-commercial purposes; and that Statistics Canada be fully acknowledged as follows: Source (or “Adapted from”, if appropriate): Statistics Canada, year of publication, name of product, catalogue number, volume and issue numbers, reference period and page(s). Otherwise, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form, by any means—electronic, mechanical or photocopy—or for any purposes without prior written permission of Licensing Services, Client Services Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0T6. December 2007 Catalogue no. 91-548-XIE ISBN 978-0-662-47049-6 Frequency: Occasional Ottawa La version française de cette publication est disponible sur demande (no 91-548-XIF au catalogue). Note of appreciation Canada owes the success of its statistical system to a long-standing partnership between Statistics Canada, the citizens of Canada, its businesses, governments and other institutions. Accurate and timely statistical information could not be produced without their continued cooperation and goodwill. Symbols The following standard symbols are used in Statistics Canada publications: . not available for any reference period .. not available for a specific reference period ... not applicable 0 true zero or a value rounded to zero 0s value rounded to 0 (zero) where there is a meaningful distinction between true zero and the value that was rounded p preliminary r revised x suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act E use with caution F too unreliable to be published Acknowledgements This report was made possible thanks to the contributions of Julie Bertrand, Dany Faucher, Krisztina Filep, Félix Fortin, Siqin Guo, Christina Jaworski, Marjorie Kirk, Michèle Lanoue, Sylvie Larivière, Denis Malo, Lucie Parisien and Daniel Pereira. The authors wish to thank them most warmly for their involvement and their availability throughout this project. The authors are exceedingly grateful to Louise Marmen, Assistant Director, Special Surveys Division, for her key contribution to the realization of both the survey and this report, as well as to Réjean Lachapelle, Director, Demolinguistic Studies, for his very useful suggestions and comments on earlier versions of this report. Our most sincere thanks also go to Rosemary Bender, Director General, Social and Demographics Statistics Branch, and Pamela White, Director, Demography Division for their ongoing support throughout the realization of the survey. Finally, the authors thank Anne Boucher, Christine D’Amours, Daniel Léonard, Chantal Mongeon and Hilary Wojciechowska for their contribution in the earlier stages of the survey development, as well as Carrie Hall, Anouk Saint-Germain, Mireille Vézina and Cindy Ubartas for their contribution in the final stages of this report. This project has also been made possible thanks to the judicious comments and suggestions as well as the enthusiastic involvement of each member of the advisory committee for the survey: Rodrigue Landry, Anne Gilbert, Wilfrid Denis, James Carter, Sharon McCully and Jean Renaud. Minorities Speak Up: Results of the Survey on the Vitality of Official-Language Minorities Table of contents Page Introduction.............................................................................................................................................................3 Section 1 Context and survey information .........................................................................................................5 1.1 Survey objectives and information needs .....................................................................................................5 1.2 Conducting the survey and defining the sample ...........................................................................................6 1.3 Sample composition and themes of the main modules of the Survey on the Vitality of Official-Language Minorities..........................................................................................................................7 1.4 Potential and limitations of the Survey on the Vitality of Official-Language Minorities .................................7 Section 2 Sense of belonging and subjective vitality........................................................................................9 2.1 A few linguistic characteristics of the Survey on the Vitality of Official-Language Minorities target population......................................................................................................................................................9 2.2. Sense of belonging.................................................................................................................................... 11 2.2.1. Identification with one or the other of the two language groups ........................................................ 11 2.2.2 Perceived importance of being able to use the minority language in daily life................................... 14 2.2.3 Importance of linguistic rights being respected .................................................................................. 16 2.2.4 Importance of provincial government services being provided in the minority language ................... 17 2.3 Perceived subjective vitality ....................................................................................................................... 18 2.3.1 How the presence of the minority language has changed in the past ten years................................ 18 2.3.2 How the presence of the minority language will change in the next ten years................................... 20 2.3.3 Perceptions of the presence of the minority language in various domains in the public sphere........ 22 2.3.4 Perceived subjective vitality of the official-language community........................................................ 23 Section 3 Use of languages in daily activities................................................................................................. 28 3.1 Description of variables and development of language use indices .......................................................... 28 3.2 Results for indices...................................................................................................................................... 29 3.2.1 French-speaking adults outside Quebec ............................................................................................ 29 3.2.2 English-speaking adults in Quebec .................................................................................................... 35 3.2.3 Language practices according to weight of official-language minorities within municipalities ........... 36 Section 4 Accessibility and use of health care in the minority language..................................................... 41 4.1 Use of health care services........................................................................................................................ 41 4.2 Language in which services were received ............................................................................................... 41 4.2.1 Main language ...................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Grandfathers and Grandchildren in the Parliament of Canada
    Feature Grandfathers and Grandchildren in the Parliament of Canada Building on an earlier study of Canadian parliamentarians who were part of the same nuclear families, the author explores grandfathers and grandchildren who served as parliamentarians. martinlubpl / www.shutterstock.com Jacques P. Gagnon n an earlier article, I presented a comparative study grandchildren. Although I did not go that far with my of Canadian parliamentarians who lived under the research, I did look at whether there are any political Isame roof (spouses, parents–children, brothers).1 constants to be found in the family ties in Canada’s In this study, I looked at grandfather–grandchild Parliament since 1867. I first looked at the nine three- relationships in Parliament. When reporters ask Justin generation families of parliamentarians (grandfathers, Trudeau how his father influenced his own political sons or sons-in-law, grandchildren) separately from career, he tells them that they should not overlook the the 23 two-generation families (grandfathers and influence of his maternal grandfather, James Sinclair. grandchildren). I did not see any major differences Born in Scotland in 1908, Sinclair was a trained civil between the two sub-groups, so I continued my engineer. He served as a squadron leader in the Royal analysis of the 32 families together.3 Canadian Air Force during the Second World War, and he was elected as the Liberal Member for Vancouver As expected, there is a generation gap between North in 1940 and then for Coast-Capilano in 1949. when grandfathers entered politics and when their From 1949 to 1952 he was the Parliamentary Assistant grandchildren did.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..170 Hansard
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 137 Ï NUMBER 182 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 37th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, May 3, 2002 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 11161 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, May 3, 2002 The House met at 10 a.m. We must, however, take care not to go to the opposite extreme and enact legislation with potential negative impact on the rights and freedoms of those we wish to protect, under the guise of fighting Prayers terrorism. We do not have to go far back in time to recall the late unlamented Bill C-42, so criticized for its negative effects on Ï (1010) fundamental rights and freedoms. [English] At the time, the government was busy boasting right and left of BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE what an ardent promoter of public security it was, rejecting the criticisms that were being made from this side of the House. Now The Deputy Speaker: It is my duty pursuant to Standing Order here we are again, starting off a new debate on a similar bill, 81 to inform the House that the motion to be considered Monday although a few changes have been made. during consideration of the business of supply is as follows: That, in the opinion of this House, the government should cease and desist its Why are we having this new debate? Simply because the public, sustained legislative and political attacks on the lives and livelihoods of rural Canadians and the communities where they live.
    [Show full text]
  • The Equichoice Ballot System*
    Equichoice THE QUESTION -the integrity of the electoral ballot THE ANSWER - Equichoice A Division of Harten Investments Limited, 1234 Kingston Road, Toronto, ON M1N 1P3 Telephone: 416-691-4167 x 6 Facsimile: 416-691-8112 Email: [email protected] 'Equichoice and the Equichoice system are trademarked and patented in various jurisdictions, including Canada The Equichoice Ballot System* Ballots whether printed or electronic are produced in every permutation and combination of names, an equal number of times Being listed first on a ballot is 2 – 6% advantage The heart of a democratic system is an electoral process as free from bias as possible "This, together with previous research documenting the existence of position bias, should serve as evidence that as the basis of electoral reform, though not as sexy as campaign finance reform, implementing of the Equichoice system in all jurisdictions, may go farther to levelling the playing field for candidates, than any attempt to regulate campaign spending." "It is known, accepted, and proven that a candidate for office, whose names appear at the top of a list of candidates, has a distinct advantage." US SUPREME COURT DECISION Using data from the 1998 Democratic Primary in New York City, which uses an Equichoice type of name rotation, precinct by precinct, we illustrate conclusively that being listed in first position contributed an average of 3 differential or 6 statistical benefit to vote tallies. The State of Ohio, similarly, in its general election shows a 2.3% to 6% advantage for being listed first. The Analysis of the 1998 New York City Democratic Primary Elections The New York City democratic primary election was a vigorously contested affair.
    [Show full text]
  • “ 12 Champlain the Electoral District of Champlain Is Bounded on the Southwest by the River St
    CHAPTER 15 An Act to amend the Revised Statutes, 1925, respecting the creation of new electoral districts [Assented to, the 4th of April, 1930] LJIS MAJESTY, with the advice and consent of the Legislative Council and of the Legislative Assembly of Quebec, enacts as follows: 1 . Section 4 of the Territorial Division Act (Revised R. S., c. 2, s. Statutes, 1925, chapter 2) is amended by replacing the4,am* word: “ eighty-six” , in the second line of paragraph 1 thereof, by the word: “ ninety-one” . 2 . Section 7 of the said act is amended by replacing the Id., s. 7, am. word: “ eighty-six” , in the first line thereof, by the word “ninety-one” . 3* Paragraph No. 9 of the Table of the Electoral Dis-ld., s. 7, § tricts, in section 7 of the said act, is amended: 9’ am' a. By replacing the word: “ Gaspe” ,in the third line of the first paragraph thereof, by the word: “ Gaspe-South” ; b. By replacing the words: “ Gaspe, .Matane” , in the ninth and tenth lines of the said first paragraph thereof, by the word: “Gaspe-North” . 4. Paragraph No. 12 of the Table of the Electoral Dis- Id., s. 7. § tricts, in section 7 of the said act, is replaced by the fol-12, rePlaoe(L lowing: “ 12 Champlain The electoral district of Champlain is bounded on the southwest by the river St. Maurice, from the mouth of the said river until it meets the north- 57 2 Chap. 15 Territorial Division 20 Geo. V west line of lot No. 132 of the cadastre of the parish of Notre-Dame-du-Mont- Carmel; thence, towards the north­ east, by the said northwest line of lot No.
    [Show full text]
  • Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. Annual Information
    ALIMENTATION COUCHE-TARD INC. ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM Fiscal year ended April 29, 2012 Amended version TABLE OF CONTENTS Subject Page Forward-Looking Statements ................................................................................................... 3 The Corporation ........................................................................................................................ 3 - Name and Incorporation ....................................................................................................... 3 - Inter-corporation Relationships ............................................................................................ 4 General Development of the Business ..................................................................................... 4 - Overview ............................................................................................................................... 4 - History .................................................................................................................................. 4 - Highlights of last three fiscal years ....................................................................................... 5 Business ................................................................................................................................... 7 - Business Strengths............................................................................................................... 7 - Store Network ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PARLIAMENTARY REPRESENTATION 55 -Electoral Districts
    PARLIAMENTARY REPRESENTATION 55 -Electoral Districts, Voters on List and Votes Polled, Names and Addresses of Members of tbe House of Commons, as Elected at tbe Twenty-First General Election, Jnne 27,1949, and Revised to Mar. 31,1953—continued. Votes Province Popu­ Voters Total Polled Party lation, 1 and Census on Votes by Name of Member P.O. Address Affili­ Electoral District 1941 List Polled Mem­ ation ber1 Quebec—concluded No. No. No. No. Labelle 39,083 21,969 18,117 8,701 H. COURTEMANCHE. Montreal P.C. Lac-Saint-Jean 29,131 15,017 13,173 7,084 A.. GAUTHIER St. Joseph d'Alma Lib. Lapointe 37,567 25,238 20,920 10,275 J. GAUTHIER Jonquiere Lib. LeVis 35,951 23,324 19,469 11,752 M. BoURGET Lauzon Lib Lotbiniere 35,452 18,210 15,764 8,849 Hon. H. LAPOINTE. Ottawa Lib. Matapedia-Matane.. 53,054 28,129 23,112 11,546 A.-P. COTE Ottawa Lib. Megantic 50,910 27,288 22,897 13,273 J. LAFONTAINE Thetford Mines, Lib. Montmagny-L'Islet. 33,394 19,434 13,299 10,004 J. LESAGE Quebec Lib. Nicolet-Yamaska... 43,892 24,462 20,073 10,208 M. BOISVERT Quebec Lib. Pontiac- Temiscamingue.... 37,085 22,224 18,067 7,817 J. H. PROUDFOOT... Fort Coulonge. Lib. Portneuf 39„769 23,545 18,689 10,932 P. GAUTHIER Deschambault. Lib. Quebec East 67,559 45,311 35,389 25,832 Rt. Hon. L.-S. ST. LAURENT* Ottawa.. Lib. Quebec South 43,725 34,358 26,568 19,383 Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Éditeur Officiel Du Québec Updated to April 1 2019 This Document Has Official Status
    0 0 4 1 © Éditeur officiel du Québec Updated to April 1 2019 This document has official status. chapter E-2.2 ACT RESPECTING ELECTIONS AND REFERENDUMS IN MUNICIPALITIES E0 L6J Eu CnTABLE OF CONTENTS Te I2TITLE I O3 MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS N, CHAPTER I S SCOPE.................................................................................................................. 1 1A 9N CHAPTER II 8D ELECTIONS......................................................................................................... 2 7R CHAPTER III E DIVISION OF TERRITORY FOR ELECTION PURPOSES F E DIVISION I R MUNICIPALITIES REQUIRED TO DIVIDE THEIR TERRITORIES INTO E ELECTORAL DISTRICTS................................................................................ 4 N DIVISION II D NUMBER AND CHARACTERISTICS OF ELECTORAL DISTRICTS......... 9 U M DIVISION III S PROCEDURE OF DIVISION INTO ELECTORAL DISTRICTS.................... 13 I DIVISION III.1 N MAINTAINING OF THE DIVISION INTO ELECTORAL DISTRICTS........ 40.1 M U DIVISION IV N MUNICIPALITIES WHOSE TERRITORY IS DIVIDED INTO WARDS....... 41 I DIVISION V C EFFECTS OF ALTERATION OF TERRITORIAL BOUNDARIES OF I MUNICIPALITY ON DIVISION THEREOF FOR ELECTION PURPOSES.. 41.1 P A CHAPTER IV L COMPOSITION OF THE COUNCIL.................................................................. 42 I CHAPTER V T PARTIES TO AN ELECTION I E DIVISION I S ELECTORS......................................................................................................... 47 DIVISION II CANDIDATES...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • State-Of-Militia-Report-Canada-Part4
    !)4 l\ff LITAHY ~ o. :H I )J ~TH T< :T, :Ko. ~. H1r1.1: .M \T<'ll , · 1:11 J~uexs11" " 1'110\1.sr IA 1, H n 1 g ,\sso<'IA11o:>. JIcl.I at Wuu1/.~torl:, ('arlrtn, ('(llwfy, vll the it/1 day 1~( S"pfr111'1r1·, 1/)1,(1, , 'i.m of 'l'a1·~t'b1, :-;Jmpr of Bull':s E} t-S, C\nlr<•q, &1-., i•n:orrliug t-0 llf'g11latio11 P 1: 1z1:s. I> E S C' I{ I I' 'J' l 0 X . ----------------·- n ripti n. \ 'alne. Huuk au<l C11q1<1. -------- $cs. I Lit prize 1(1 00 Pri,·:ite Simon . \\'ood tock RiHeJ. ...• .:.>ud do l:? 00 .\l~Le<><I.. lfna!gu IL \ \'. l_lournc ..... rf,, 3r..1 do 11 (le) Ensign A. l 0 ume.. ......... t!o 4th do Io oo Prhate I>. Jnckson. .. .. .i,, <>th do !) 00 Eu-ib'll H. )!cl ntyrc. do Gth dol 8 00 .. .·.. I Prfr:.te .\. B. Bull . .i., 7th d1· .. 00 do .T. I>. Hrurd. .. .. .i., bth •lo li 00 <'a1,tain It ll. Ketchum. d1J !lt.h tlv r. t)O ....... , 10th cl., PriYnte l'. Garden. .... d11 4 ()() <lo II. B. Smith. • . .i., ......f . lltlt .1. :; :;o Ca1;tai11 awl Paymaster ,J. l>. • .... l:!th du 1">.t:tchum • • . • . • • . .i,, :; uo Priv.. te ( '. IL F"rgu;on . d" H ... 13th 110 '.! ;;o .11th c1 •• <lo I -r:wl 't'r:1('y.. c111 4 1 !.! r1'.J St·tg'e:int \\". .F. ~\tkiusou.. "'' 4 1 I ith du :! 00 .IGth 1)0 Private l>.
    [Show full text]
  • Postal Codes by Federal Ridings File 1996 Representation Order, Reference Guide
    Catalogue no. 92F0028GIE Postal Codes by Federal Ridings File 1996 Representation Order, Reference guide June 2003 Statistics Statistique Canada Canada ii How to obtain more information For information on the wide range of data available from Statistics Canada, you can contact us by calling one of our toll-free numbers. You can also contact us by e-mail or by visiting our Web site. National inquiries line 1 800 263-1136 National telecommunications device for the hearing impaired 1 800 363-7629 Depository Services Program inquiries 1 800 700-1033 Fax line for Depository Services Program 1 800 889-9734 E-mail inquiries [email protected] Web site www.statcan.ca Ordering and subscription information This product, Catalogue no. 92F0028GIE, is available on Internet free. Users can obtain single issues at http:// www.statcan.ca/cgi-bin/downpub/freepub.cgi. Standards of service to the public Statistics Canada is committed to serving its clients in a prompt, reliable and courteous manner and in the official language of their choice. To this end, the Agency has developed standards of service which its employees observe in serving its clients. To obtain a copy of these service standards, please contact Statistics Canada toll free at 1 800 263-1136. Statistics Canada Postal Codes by Federal Ridings File 1996 Representation Order, Reference guide June 2003 Published by authority of the Minister responsible for Statistics Canada Minister of Industry, 2004 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without prior written permission from Licence Services, Marketing Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0T6.
    [Show full text]
  • Entangling the Quebec Act
    1 INTRODUCTION Entangling the Quebec Act Ollivier Hubert and François Furstenberg Although it features in many historical accounts, the Quebec Act too often remains on the sidelines. National narratives – which most often structure historical writing – highlight other foundational events instead. Quebec and Canadian history both make La Conquête a central turning point: the conquest of 1759–60, when New France fell, and landed (providentially or tragically, depending on one’s perspective) in the British Empire. In Native American history, the Royal Proclamation of 1763 stands as a milestone: indigenous resistance to British power resulting in the creation of a Native American territory off limits to European settlement, establishing land and treaty rights that would persist into the present. The United States, meanwhile, dates its foundation from 1776, the year when settler resistance to British power culminated in a Declaration of Independence and a war for nationhood. As for the British Empire, 1783 marks the date at which the first empire ended and the second began. Even the events of 1812 have recently joined the mix, now reframed as “the fight for Canada” waged by the nation’s three founding peoples, French, English, and Native American. In these and other narratives, the Quebec Act of 1774 plays a bit part – if it plays any at all.1 Thus does the Quebec Act fall through the scholarly cracks. (The last sustained analysis of the Act is now thirty years old.2) And yet today, more than ever, there are good reasons to question its marginality. Recent attempts to approach history from transnational perspectives offer an opportunity to reinterpret the Quebec Act across these and other historiographical boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legality of an Independent Quebec: Canadian Constitutional Law and Self-Determination in International Law Marc A
    Boston College International and Comparative Law Review Volume 3 | Issue 1 Article 6 12-1-1979 The Legality of an Independent Quebec: Canadian Constitutional Law and Self-Determination in International Law Marc A. Thibodeau Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/iclr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Marc A. Thibodeau, The Legality of an Independent Quebec: Canadian Constitutional Law and Self-Determination in International Law, 3 B.C. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 99 (1979), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/iclr/vol3/iss1/6 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Legality of an Independent Quebec: Canadian Constitutional Law and Self­ Determination in International Law I. INTRODUCTION Since the signing of the Treaty of Paris (Treaty) on February 10, 1763,1 which formalized the British position in Canada and in other lands on the North American continent,2 members of the French-Canadian community, 1. Definitive Treaty of Peace Between France, Great Britain and Spain, Feb. 10, 1763, Great Britain-France-Spain, 42 Parry's T.S. 320. The Treaty settled various territorial disputes at the conclusion of the War of 1756-63 (Seven Year's War). As part of the settlements, the King of France ceded to Great Britain all of its possessions in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMUNITY CONSERVATION PLAN for the Lac Deschênes – Ottawa River Important Bird Area
    COMMUNITY CONSERVATION PLAN For the Lac Deschênes – Ottawa River Important Bird Area January, 2014 For the Lac Deschênes – Ottawa River Steering Committee Nature Canada Table of Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Suggested citation .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 The IBA program ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 The Lac Deschênes - Ottawa River IBA ................................................................................................................... 6 Goals of this initiative ............................................................................................................................................... 7 2. IBA Site Information ........................................................................................................................................... 8 Figure 1: Proposed IBA
    [Show full text]