A New Vision for Downtown Boston
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Return of Private Foundation CT' 10 201Z '
Return of Private Foundation OMB No 1545-0052 Form 990 -PF or Section 4947(a)(1) Nonexempt Charitable Trust Department of the Treasury Treated as a Private Foundation Internal Revenue Service Note. The foundation may be able to use a copy of this return to satisfy state reporting requirem M11 For calendar year 20 11 or tax year beainnina . 2011. and ending . 20 Name of foundation A Employer Identification number THE PFIZER FOUNDATION, INC. 13-6083839 Number and street (or P 0 box number If mail is not delivered to street address ) Room/suite B Telephone number (see instructions) (212) 733-4250 235 EAST 42ND STREET City or town, state, and ZIP code q C If exemption application is ► pending, check here • • • • • . NEW YORK, NY 10017 G Check all that apply Initial return Initial return of a former public charity D q 1 . Foreign organizations , check here . ► Final return Amended return 2. Foreign organizations meeting the 85% test, check here and attach Address chang e Name change computation . 10. H Check type of organization' X Section 501( exempt private foundation E If private foundation status was terminated Section 4947 ( a)( 1 ) nonexem pt charitable trust Other taxable p rivate foundation q 19 under section 507(b )( 1)(A) , check here . ► Fair market value of all assets at end J Accounting method Cash X Accrual F If the foundation is in a60-month termination of year (from Part Il, col (c), line Other ( specify ) ---- -- ------ ---------- under section 507(b)(1)(B),check here , q 205, 8, 166. 16) ► $ 04 (Part 1, column (d) must be on cash basis) Analysis of Revenue and Expenses (The (d) Disbursements total of amounts in columns (b), (c), and (d) (a) Revenue and (b) Net investment (c) Adjusted net for charitable may not necessanly equal the amounts in expenses per income income Y books purposes C^7 column (a) (see instructions) .) (cash basis only) I Contribution s odt s, grants etc. -
Boston Common and the Public Garden
WalkBoston and the Public Realm N 3 minute walk T MBTA Station As Massachusetts’ leading advocate for safe and 9 enjoyable walking environments, WalkBoston works w with local and state agencies to accommodate walkers | in all parts of the public realm: sidewalks, streets, bridges, shopping areas, plazas, trails and parks. By B a o working to make an increasingly safe and more s attractive pedestrian network, WalkBoston creates t l o more transportation choices and healthier, greener, n k more vibrant communities. Please volunteer and/or C join online at www.walkboston.org. o B The center of Boston’s public realm is Boston m Common and the Public Garden, where the pedestrian m o network is easily accessible on foot for more than o 300,000 Downtown, Beacon Hill and Back Bay workers, n & shoppers, visitors and residents. These walkways s are used by commuters, tourists, readers, thinkers, t h talkers, strollers and others during lunch, commutes, t e and on weekends. They are wonderful places to walk o P — you can find a new route every day. Sample walks: u b Boston Common Loops n l i • Perimeter/25 minute walk – Park St., Beacon St., c MacArthur, Boylston St. and Lafayette Malls. G • Central/15 minute walk – Lafayette, Railroad, a MacArthur Malls and Mayor’s Walk. r d • Bandstand/15 minute walk – Parade Ground Path, e Beacon St. Mall and Long Path. n Public Garden Loops • Perimeter/15 minute walk – Boylston, Charles, Beacon and Arlington Paths. • Swans and Ducklings/8 minute walk – Lagoon Paths. Public Garden & Boston Common • Mid-park/10 minute walk – Mayor’s, Haffenreffer Walks. -
An Overview of Structural & Aesthetic Developments in Tall Buildings
ctbuh.org/papers Title: An Overview of Structural & Aesthetic Developments in Tall Buildings Using Exterior Bracing & Diagrid Systems Authors: Kheir Al-Kodmany, Professor, Urban Planning and Policy Department, University of Illinois Mir Ali, Professor Emeritus, School of Architecture, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Subjects: Architectural/Design Structural Engineering Keywords: Structural Engineering Structure Publication Date: 2016 Original Publication: International Journal of High-Rise Buildings Volume 5 Number 4 Paper Type: 1. Book chapter/Part chapter 2. Journal paper 3. Conference proceeding 4. Unpublished conference paper 5. Magazine article 6. Unpublished © Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / Kheir Al-Kodmany; Mir Ali International Journal of High-Rise Buildings International Journal of December 2016, Vol 5, No 4, 271-291 High-Rise Buildings http://dx.doi.org/10.21022/IJHRB.2016.5.4.271 www.ctbuh-korea.org/ijhrb/index.php An Overview of Structural and Aesthetic Developments in Tall Buildings Using Exterior Bracing and Diagrid Systems Kheir Al-Kodmany1,† and Mir M. Ali2 1Urban Planning and Policy Department, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60607, USA 2School of Architecture, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA Abstract There is much architectural and engineering literature which discusses the virtues of exterior bracing and diagrid systems in regards to sustainability - two systems which generally reduce building materials, enhance structural performance, and decrease overall construction cost. By surveying past, present as well as possible future towers, this paper examines another attribute of these structural systems - the blend of structural functionality and aesthetics. Given the external nature of these structural systems, diagrids and exterior bracings can visually communicate the inherent structural logic of a building while also serving as a medium for artistic effect. -
Trinity Financial TRINITY FINANCIAL from the Beginning
- WHAT’S really IMPORTANT? 32 years Over $3 billion in development work 9,500 units / over 600,000 sf retail + commercial 7,000 units under management 260 employees Properties located in MA, RI, CT & NY Headquarter offices in Boston & Manhattan trinity financial TRINITY FINANCIAL from the beginning ince 1987, Trinity Financial has pursued a distinctive S vision of real estate development based on a few core principles and a collaborative urban spirit. We love the challenge of each new project, but we’re also energized by the broader issues of revitaliz- ing neighborhoods, strengthening cities and fostering opportunity. In every case, we start from a clear understanding of how cities work, how we can help and why our work matters. As the project unfolds, we translate this energy and understanding into struc- tures and relationships that Revitalizing succeed financially, respect neighborhoods every constituency and enhance life for everyone they touch. Strengthening cities Fostering opportunity Our Projects 60 King - Providence, RI Total Development Cost: $22.7 million Units: 60 Completed: 2018 Trinity’s 60 King is an adaptive reuse project which converted a vacant state historic tax credits, soft debt from Rhode Island Housing historic mill building in the Olneyville neighborhood of Providence into and the City of Providence, as well as RIDEM Brownfields 60 units of mixed-income rental housing. Originally constructed in 1923, Remediation grant funding. 60 King was the home of the Rochambeau Worsted Wool manufacturing facility until the 1950s when the complex was acquired by the Imperial 60 King is the second project in the multi-phase redevelopment Knife Company. -
Old Colony Planning Council
Old Colony Planning Council OCPC OFFICERS President Jeanmarie Kent Joyce Secretary Lee Hartmann Treasurer Robert Moran COMMUNITY DELEGATE ALTERNATE ABINGTON A. Stanley Littlefield Robert Wing AVON Frank Staffier Charles Marinelli BRIDGEWATER Anthony P. Anacki BROCKTON Robert G. Moran, Jr. Preston Huckabee EAST BRIDGEWATER Richard O’Flaherty EASTON Jeanmarie Kent Joyce Steve Donahue HALIFAX John G. Mather Troy E. Garron HANSON Robert Overholtzer Phillip Lindquist KINGSTON Paul Basler PEMBROKE Gerard Dempsey Brian Van Riper PLYMOUTH Lee Hartmann Valerie Massard PLYMPTON John Rantuccio James Mulcahy STOUGHTON Joseph Landolfi Robert E. Kuver WEST BRIDGEWATER Eldon F. Moreira Nancy Bresciani WHITMAN Fred Gilmetti Daniel Salvucci DELEGATE-AT-LARGE Matthew Striggles OCPC STAFF Pasquale Ciaramella Executive Director Lila Burgess Ombudsman Program Director Caleb Cornock Transportation Intern Jed Cornock Transportation Planner Hazel Gauley Assistant Ombudsman Director Raymond Guarino Transportation Planner Patrick Hamilton AAA Administrator Bruce G. Hughes Economic Development/ Community Planner Charles Kilmer Transportation Program Manager Jane E. Linhares Grants Monitor/ Secretary Janet McGinty Fiscal Officer Susan McGrath GIS Coordinator William McNulty Transportation Planner Anne Nicholas Ombudsman Program Assistant Norman Sorgman Assistant Ombudsman Director Jacqueline Surette Fiscal Consultant James R. Watson Comprehensive Planning Supervisor Karen Winger Transportation Planner OLD COLONY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION James Harrington -
About Our Pictures
9446 Hilldale Drive, Dallas, TX 75231 (214) 221-3371 or (214) 221-3378 www.wiszco.com About our Pictures We chose a pictorial montage of U.S. Cityscapes as a theme for our website because we believe it best represents the construction industry. “Buildings and objects” are perhaps the most tangible representation of the construction industry as a whole. Additionally, buildings (in particular) represent the places where we, as people, collectively “live, work and play” (to paraphrase an often used expression by the real estate development community). More importantly, finished buildings and objects are the culmination of construction projects – and such projects are the by- product of the collective effort of a great many. In the end, all completed construction projects become a part of our community and eventually, the cities that comprise our great nation. Next time you’re in the “big city”, take a good look around and marvel at what the human spirit has been able to accomplish. In addition, we also chose a pictorial montage of U.S. Cityscapes since we provide our services on a nation-wide basis. When traveling throughout the United States, we often find ourselves in these great cities: Anchorage Located at the tip of the Cook Inlet, Anchorage is our nation’s northern-most city. It is by far, Alaska’s largest city comprising more than 40% of the state’s population. Only New York City has a higher percentage of state residents living in one city. Though field operations are centered on the north slope of Alaska, oil and gas production is the most visible industry in Anchorage. -
Case Study John Hancock Tower
Case Study John Hancock Tower PROJECT SUMMARY Installer Sonny’s Glass Tinting Type of Film Clear 4 mil (CL 400 PS SR) Installation Date 1986 Windows Covered 10,344 windows Performance Evaluation Performed 2009 Window Film Provides Decades of Safety for John Hancock Tower in Boston, MA. THE CHALLENGE The impressive John Hancock Tower was completed in 1978 and forever changed the Boston skyline. A design marvel created by one of the world’s most famous architects, Henry N. Cobb, it immediately became one of the city’s most recognizable buildings. Unfortunately, the Hancock Tower’s innovative design had a flaw; the glass kept falling out of the windows! The building came to be known by locals as “The Plywood Palace” due to the 3,500 plus pieces of plywood used to replace the fallen glass. Numerous steps were taken to correct the flaw; counterweights were installed at both ends of the building to minimize sway, every window was replaced with thermally tempered glass, and the entire structure was stiffened with the installation of additional steel bracing throughout. These efforts alleviated many of the issues but did not completely eliminate the glass breakage. Finally, a window film manufacturer, Madico, Inc., was brought in to help solve the glass breakage problem. THE SOLUTION Working in conjunction with the renowned Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Madico developed a safety film that when applied to glass with a pressure-sensitive adhesive and attached to the window frames using a decorative mullion, would hold the broken glass in place and prevent dangerous shards from injuring the pedestrians walking below the 600 ft. -
WILLIAM J. LEMESSURIER, P.E. Structural Engineer 1926-2007
WILLIAM J. LEMESSURIER, P.E. Structural Engineer 1926-2007 Elected in 1978 “For teaching, research, and practice of structural design for buildings, with special concern for the relationship of structures to total architecture.” William James LeMessurier (Luh-MEASURE) Jr., innovative structural engineer, died on June 14, 2007 in Casco, Maine. Bill, as he was known to family, friends and colleagues, was born on June 12, 1926 in Pontiac, Michigan. The youngest of four children, he attended the Cranbrook School for Boys (whose campus was designed by Finish architect Eliel Saarinen) in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan where Bill showed an early aptitude in mathematics, music and the arts. For his undergraduate education, Bill decided to attend Harvard College instead of M.I.T., largely due to Harvard’s more inviting campus. He received his bachelor’s degree from Harvard in 1947, majoring in mathematics. Bill then studied architecture at Harvard’s Graduate School for Design before transferring to M.I.T.’s Department of Building Engineering and Construction to study structural engineering. While still at M.I.T., Bill worked part-time for Albert Goldberg, an established structural engineer in Boston. After receiving his master’s degree in 1953, Bill worked full-time for Mr. Goldberg and became a partner in Goldberg, LeMessurier Associates in the mid-1950’s. In April 1961, he ended his partnership with Mr. Goldberg and established LeMessurier Associates with new partners William Thoen, Emil Hervol and James Collins, from which he retired in 1995. Throughout his career, Bill pioneered the use of innovative structural systems that efficiently resisted gravity, wind and earthquake loads while respecting the aesthetic concerns of his architectural clients. -
Directions to Davio's
75 ARLINGTON STREET BOSTON, MA 02116 617.357.4810 :: DAVIOS.COM DIRECTIONS TO DAVIO’S Davio’s is located at 75 Arlington Street in Park Square, which is in the Back Bay area of Boston. Our main entrance is at the corner of Arlington Street and Stuart Street. We are directly opposite the Park Plaza Hotel. Davio’s is part of the 75 Arlington St./10 St. James complex and can also be accessed via the glass atrium connecting the 10 St. James Street entrance and the 333 Stuart Street entrance. Both valet and validated parking are available. From the South: • Take Southeast Expressway north and get off at Exit 20. Keep to left towards South Station Via Frontage Rd. • Move into left lane and at second set of lights take a left — Back Bay / South End — this is E. Berkeley St. which becomes Berkeley St. • Proceed to the intersection of Stuart St. • Take a right on Stuart and Davio’s is at the end of the block on the left. From the North: • Take Rt.I-93 south and get off at Exit 26A, Storrow Dr./Cambridge. • Proceed on the connector and take Storrow Dr./Back Bay exit to the.left • Proceed on Storrow Dr. and take Copley Sq./Back Bay exit on left. • At intersection, take a left on Beacon St. and the immediate right onto Arlington St. • Stay on Arlington approx. 0.3 miles and Davio’s is on the corner of Arlington & Stuart across from the Park Plaza Hotel From the Airport (Logan International): • Take Airport Exit to Sumner Tunnel/ I-93 North. -
BAIN CAPITAL VENTURE INVESTORS, LLC Form 4 Filed
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 4 Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities Filing Date: 2021-06-01 | Period of Report: 2021-05-28 SEC Accession No. 0000899243-21-021452 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) REPORTING OWNER BAIN CAPITAL VENTURE INVESTORS, LLC Mailing Address Business Address 200 CLARENDON STREET 200 CLARENDON STREET CIK:1309469| State of Incorp.:DE | Fiscal Year End: 1231 BOSTON MA 02116 BOSTON MA 02116 Type: 4 | Act: 34 | File No.: 001-40430 | Film No.: 21987523 617-516-2000 BCIP Venture Associates Mailing Address Business Address C/O BAIN CAPITAL, LLC C/O BAIN CAPITAL, LLC CIK:1408649| State of Incorp.:DE | Fiscal Year End: 1231 JOHN HANCOCK TOWER, JOHN HANCOCK TOWER, Type: 4 | Act: 34 | File No.: 001-40430 | Film No.: 21987515 200 CLARENDON STREET 200 CLARENDON STREET BOSTON MA 02116 BOSTON MA 02116 617-516-2000 BCIP VENTURE ASSOCIATES-B Mailing Address Business Address C/O BAIN CAPITAL, LLC C/O BAIN CAPITAL, LLC CIK:1408676| State of Incorp.:DE JOHN HANCOCK TOWER, JOHN HANCOCK TOWER, Type: 4 | Act: 34 | File No.: 001-40430 | Film No.: 21987514 200 CLARENDON STREET 200 CLARENDON STREET BOSTON MA 02116 BOSTON MA 02116 617-516-2878 Bain Capital Venture Fund 2016, L.P. Mailing Address Business Address 200 CLARENDON STREET 200 CLARENDON STREET CIK:1678394| State of Incorp.:E9 | Fiscal Year End: 1231 BOSTON MA 02116 BOSTON MA 02116 Type: 4 | Act: 34 | File No.: 001-40430 | Film No.: 21987517 6175162000 BAIN CAPITAL VENTURE FUND 2014, L.P. Mailing Address Business Address JOHN HANCOCK TOWER JOHN HANCOCK TOWER CIK:1609330| State of Incorp.:E9 | Fiscal Year End: 1231 200 CLARENDON STREET 200 CLARENDON STREET Type: 4 | Act: 34 | File No.: 001-40430 | Film No.: 21987519 BOSTON MA 02116 BOSTON MA 02116 617-516-2878 Bain Capital Venture Coinvestment II Investors, LLC Mailing Address Business Address 200 CLARENDON STREET 200 CLARENDON STREET CIK:1862142| State of Incorp.:E9 | Fiscal Year End: 1231 BAIN CAPITAL, L.P. -
BOSTON REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY October 18, 1979
j. __ • ' 4 BOSTON REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY October 18, 1979 Development Plan for Planned Development Area No. 12 Former Site of Children's Museum Pond Street, between Eliot and Burroughs Streets Jamaica Plain Owners- Developers Partnership of Kevin J. Ahearn, Moritz 0. Bergmeyer and Tyrone Hanlan (Ahearn, Bergmeyer & Hanlan). Architect Moritz Bergmeyer Associates, Inc., Boston Location and Description of Site A certai'n parcel of land containing 115,718 square feet situated in the Jamaica Plain district of Boston on Pond Street (also known as the Jamaicaway) between Eliot and Burroughs Streets, formerly occupied by the Children's Museum, more fully described in Exhibit A. The site is presently occupied by four main structures: the former Mitton House which was the main museum building, the Curtis House also known as the Haunted House, the Carriage House which had been remodelled as an auditorium, and a caretaker's house on Eliot Street known as the Williams House, along with a parking area to the rear of the Curtis House and two small garages. Proposed Location and Appearance of Structures The existing structures on site shall be renovated into twenty-four condominium dwelling units and two garages. A one-story annex to the Mitton House may be increased to two and one-half stories. The Carriage House may have several skylights and dormers set into the roof, and windows and doors may be cut into the existing masonry walls. The exterior building materials shall remain the same on the existing struc tures and therefore the addition to the Mitton House will probably be stucco, subject to design review. -
FENWAY Project Completion Report
BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from Boston Public Library http://www.archive.org/details/fenwayprojectcomOObost 1983 Survey & Planninsr Grant mperty Of bGblu^ MT A.nTunKifv PART I -FENWAY Project Completion Report submitted August 31, 1984 to Massachusetts Historical Commission Uteary Boston Landmarks Commission Boston Redevelopment Authority COVER PHOTO: Fenway, 1923 Courtesy of The Bostonian Society FENWAY PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT Prepared by Rosalind Pollan Carol Kennedy Edward Gordon for THE BOSTON LANDMARKS COMMISSION AUGUST 1984 PART ONE - PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT (contained in this volume) TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION Brief history of The Fenway Review of Architectural Styles Notable Areas of Development and Sub Area Maps II. METHODOLOGY General Procedures Evaluation - Recording Research III. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Districts National Register of Historic Places Boston Landmark Districts Architectural Conservation Districts B. Individual Properties National Register Listing Boston Landmark Designation Further Study Areas Appendix I - Sample Inventory Forms Appendix II - Key to IOC Scale Inventory Maps Appendix III - Inventory Coding System Map I - Fenway Study Area Map II - Sub Areas Map III - District Recommendations Map IV - Individual Site Recommendations Map V - Sites for Further Study PART TWO - FENWAY INVENTORY FORMS (see separate volume) TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION II. METHODOLOGY General Procedures Evaluation - Recording Research III. BUILDING INFORMATION FORMS '^^ n •— LLl < ^ LU :l < o > 2 Q Z) H- CO § o z yi LU 1 L^ 1 ■ o A i/K/K I. INTRODUCTION The Fenway Preservation Study, conducted from September 1983 to July 1984, was administered by the Boston Landmarks Commission, with the assistance of a matching grant-in-aid from the Department of the Interior, National Park Service, through the Massachusetts Historical Commission, Office of the Secretary of State, Michael J.