The Green Turn
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
RESOURCES for the FUTURE Special Edition Table of Contents August 2016
Special Edition www.sci-ru.org 8 2016 RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE Special Edition Table of Contents August 2016 Special Edition Topics INTRODUCTION Tomsk Polytechnic University: Production of Benefits 2 TPU Rector Petr Chubik speaks about resource efficiency not just as a term but as an ideology. ARCTIC RESEARCH Treasures of the Shelf 8 Natalia Leskova The time has come for mankind to face Arctic research and a range of dangers that come along with it. Alexey Mazurov, First Vice- Rector of TPU, speaks about progressive comprehensive research in the Russian sector of the Arctic. ROBOTIC ENGINEERING SPACE TECHNOLOGY Sweating Robots — Happy People 48 Earth outside the Window 14 Valery Chumakov Valery Chumakov Dmitry Sonkin, assistant professor of TPU Institute Researchers at Tomsk Institute of Physics of Strength and of Cybernetics, reveals the Tomsk scientists’ understanding Materials Science SB RAS print satellites using their 3D printers of the notion “robotic engineering”. and create unique protective window coating. INDUSTRIAL TOMOGRAPHY OIL DEVELOPMENT Seeing the Hidden 54 Recovering the Non-Recoverable 22 Natalia Leskova Natalia Leskova Industrial tomography methods help avoid dramatic accidents Western Siberia is the leader in the number of difficult oil caused by miniscule imperceptible defects. This is the topic of reserves. Andrey Dmitriev, Director of TPU Institute of Natural our conversation with Valery Borikov, Director of the Institute Resources, speaks about scientific and technological miracles of Non-Destructive Testing. that help recover these treasures. NATURAL RESOURCES WATER RESOURCES University of Rarities 58 The Vital Water 28 Valery Chumakov Natalia Leskova Tomsk is the heart of the region known for its immense storages of The health of mankind directly depends on the kind of water it rare elements. -
Chapter 7. Cities of the Russian North in the Context of Climate Change
? chapter seven Cities of the Russian North in the Context of Climate Change Oleg Anisimov and Vasily Kokorev Introduction In addressing Arctic urban sustainability, one has to deal with the com- plex interplay of multiple factors, such as governance and economic development, demography and migration, environmental changes and land use, changes in the ecosystems and their services, and climate change.1 While climate change can be seen as a factor that exacerbates existing vulnerabilities to other stressors, changes in temperatures, precipitation, snow accumulation, river and lake ice, and hydrological conditions also have direct implications for Northern cities. Climate change leads to a reduction in the demand for heating energy, on one hand, and heightens concerns about the fate of the infrastruc- ture built upon thawing permafrost, on the other. Changes in snowfall are particularly important and have direct implications for the urban economy, because, together with heating costs, expenses for snow removal from streets, airport runways, roofs, and ventilation spaces underneath buildings standing on pile foundations built upon perma- frost constitute the bulk of a city’s maintenance budget during the long cold period of the year. Many cities are located in river valleys and are prone to fl oods that lead to enormous economic losses, inju- ries, and in some cases human deaths. The severity of the northern climate has a direct impact on the regional migration of labor. Climate could thus potentially be viewed as an inexhaustible public resource that creates opportunities for sustainable urban development (Simp- 142 | Oleg Anisimov and Vasily Kokorev son 2009). Long-term trends show that climate as a resource is, in fact, becoming more readily available in the Russian North, notwith- standing the general perception that globally climate change is one of the greatest challenges facing humanity in the twenty-fi rst century. -
Synthesis Report Synthesis Report
Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report Synthesis Report An Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change This underlying report, approved paragraph by paragraph at IPCC Plenary XVIII (Wembley, United Kingdom, 24-29 September 2001), represents the formally agreed statement of the IPCC concerning key findings and uncertainties contained in the Working Group contributions to the Third Assessment Report. Based on a draft prepared by: Core Writing Team Robert T. Watson, Daniel L. Albritton, Terry Barker, Igor A. Bashmakov, Osvaldo Canziani, Renate Christ, Ulrich Cubasch, Ogunlade Davidson, Habiba Gitay, David Griggs, Kirsten Halsnaes, John Houghton, Joanna House, Zbigniew Kundzewicz, Murari Lal, Neil Leary, Christopher Magadza, James J. McCarthy, John F.B. Mitchell, Jose Roberto Moreira, Mohan Munasinghe, Ian Noble, Rajendra Pachauri, Barrie Pittock, Michael Prather, Richard G. Richels, John B. Robinson, Jayant Sathaye, Stephen Schneider, Robert Scholes, Thomas Stocker, Narasimhan Sundararaman, Rob Swart, Tomihiro Taniguchi, and D. Zhou Extended Team Q.K. Ahmad, Oleg Anisimov, Nigel Arnell, Fons Baede, Tariq Banuri, Leonard Bernstein, Daniel H. Bouille, Timothy Carter, Catrinus J. Jepma, Liu Chunzhen, John Church, Stewart Cohen, Paul Desanker, William Easterling, Chris Folland, Filippo Giorgi, Jonathan Gregory, Joanna Haigh, Hideo Harasawa, Bruce Hewitson, Jean-Charles Hourcade, Mike Hulme, Tom Karl, Pekka E. Kauppi, Rik Leemans, Anil Markandya, Luis Jose Mata, Bryant McAvaney, Anthony McMichael, Linda Mearns, Jerry Meehl, Gylvan Meira-Filho, Evan Mills, William R. Moomaw, Berrien Moore, Tsuneyuki Morita, M.J. Mwandosya, Leonard Nurse, Martin Parry, Joyce Penner, Colin Prentice, Venkatachalam Ramaswamy, Sarah Raper, Jim Salinger, Michael Scott, Roger A. Sedjo, Priyaradshi R. Shukla, Barry Smit, Joel Smith, Leena Srivastava, Ron Stouffer, Kanako Tanaka, Ferenc L. -
Who Is Who 1997
2nd Volume Convention on Climate Change Who is Who in the UNFCCC Process 1996 - 1997 FCCC Directory of Participants at Meetings of the Convention Bodies in the period July 1996 to December 1997 UN (COP2 - COP3) Contents Introduction page 3 Representatives of Countries page 5 Representatives of Observer Organizations page 259 Appendix I - Intergovernmental organizations accredited by the Conference of the Parties up to its third session page 482 Appendix II - Non-governmental organizations accredited by the Conference of the Parties up to its third session page 483 Appendix III - Alphabetical index of entries page 486 Appendix IV - Information update form page 523 1 2 Introduction This is the second volume of the Who’s Who in the UNFCCC Process. As indicated by its subtitle, this CC:INFO product is a directory of delegates and observers having attended the second or third sessions of the Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, or any of its subsidiary body meetings in between (COP2-COP3). This Who is Who was developed to provide those involved in the Climate Change process with a single, easy-to-use document, enabling them to renew or establish contact with each other. The Who is Who provides the title and contact information (e.g., institutional and e-mail addresses, direct telephone and fax numbers, etc…) for each individual, as provided to the secretariat during conference registration. Some of this information is now no longer valid, due to, e.g., new professional reassignments, including in some cases to the Climate Change Secretariat. -
Ipcc), 1979-1992
Negotiating Climates: The Politics of Climate Change and the Formation of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 1979-1992 A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of PhD in the Faculty of Life Sciences 2014 David George Hirst Table of Contents Abstract .............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Declaration ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 Copyright Statement ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Key Figures in Thesis .................................................................................................................................... 8 List of Acronyms............................................................................................................................................ 10 Chapter 1 – Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 11 1. Aims of thesis .................................................................................................................................... 14 2. -
Russian Climate Politics: Light at the End of the Tunnel?
April 2007 BRIEFING PAPER RUSSIAN CLIMATE POLITICS: LIGHT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL? By Anna Korppoo 1 and Arild Moe 2 Russian climate politics were certainly a talking point a few years ago due to the country’s decisive role in the entry into force of the Kyoto Protocol. The views of various potentially influential officials were reported by the world media almost on a daily basis. Since the ratification of the Kyoto Protocol by Russia in 2004, and its entry into force, Russian climate politics have received less attention. In this paper we update our previous analyses of Russian climate politics and policies, and report the latest developments, including material from the discussions in the ‘JI in Russia’ workshop 26 March 2007 organised by Oxford Climate Policy in co-operation with Climate Strategies. The main tasks of this paper are to review: • the readiness of Russia to implement the Kyoto mechanisms • the fulfilment of the compliance requirements of the Kyoto Protocol • the current political debate about climate policy by various key players • the emerging discussion on the post-2012 positions of Russia. 1 Associate Research Fellow, Fridtjof Nansen Institute, email: [email protected] 2 Senior Research Fellow, Fridtjof Nansen Institute, email: [email protected] Background cooperate. One of the explaining factors is the fact that climate change is still In Russia the climate change issue has not regarded by many as not being a serious gained a high profile on the national environmental problem. Russia has more political agenda. This contrasts with the country’s crucial role in the entry into immediate environmental problems on its force of the Kyoto Protocol; in the territory than those posed by climate absence of the US, the Russian change, and it is not uncommonly argued participation was necessary in bringing that climate change could even benefit the together countries accounting for 55% of country (Kotov 2004, pp.3, 6-7). -
Subject of the Russian Federation)
How to use the Atlas The Atlas has two map sections The Main Section shows the location of Russia’s intact forest landscapes. The Thematic Section shows their tree species composition in two different ways. The legend is placed at the beginning of each set of maps. If you are looking for an area near a town or village Go to the Index on page 153 and find the alphabetical list of settlements by English name. The Cyrillic name is also given along with the map page number and coordinates (latitude and longitude) where it can be found. Capitals of regions and districts (raiony) are listed along with many other settlements, but only in the vicinity of intact forest landscapes. The reader should not expect to see a city like Moscow listed. Villages that are insufficiently known or very small are not listed and appear on the map only as nameless dots. If you are looking for an administrative region Go to the Index on page 185 and find the list of administrative regions. The numbers refer to the map on the inside back cover. Having found the region on this map, the reader will know which index map to use to search further. If you are looking for the big picture Go to the overview map on page 35. This map shows all of Russia’s Intact Forest Landscapes, along with the borders and Roman numerals of the five index maps. If you are looking for a certain part of Russia Find the appropriate index map. These show the borders of the detailed maps for different parts of the country. -
Comments on the Climategate 2.0 Emails
Comments on the Climategate 2.0 Emails On February 11, 2010, Peabody Energy Corporation (“Peabody”) filed an extensive Petition for Reconsideration of U.S. EPA’s final action entitled, “Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act,” 74 Fed. Reg. 66496 (Dec. 15, 2009) (the “Endangerment Finding”). Peabody’s reconsideration petition (“Petition”) was largely based on information and materials that became available as a result of Climategate—the release on the Internet of a trove of email communications and documents from the University of East Anglia’s (“UEA”) Climatic Research Unit (“CRU”) in early November of 2009.1 The CRU emails garnered significant attention among the media, the blogosphere, professional and lay scientists, and government agencies because they revealed, for the first time, disturbing and highly questionable practices and actions by leading climate scientists and researchers employed at UEA-CRU and their colleagues at other leading academic facilities.2 Indeed, certain government agencies held hearings on, or conducted inquiries into the circumstances of the release. In its reconsideration petition, Peabody brought these questionable practices and activities to the attention of EPA. Peabody argued that the CRU material significantly weakened EPA’s reliance on the work of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (“IPCC”) as support for EPA’s Endangerment Finding. The very scientists implicated in the Climategate scandal were heavily involved in all stages of the production of the IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report (“AR4”) and otherwise highly influential in the workings of the IPCC and 1 See “Scientist steps down during e-mail probe; Hacked messages about global warming caused controversy,” Washington Post (Dec. -
List of Exporters Interested in Supplying Grain to China
List of exporters interested in supplying grain to China № Name of exporting company Company address Contact Infromation (phone num. / email) Zabaykalsky Krai Rapeseed Zabaykalsky Krai, Kalgansky District, Bura 1st , Vitaly Kozlov str., 25 1 OOO ''Burinskoe'' [email protected]. building A 2 OOO ''Zelenyi List'' Zabaykalsky Krai, Chita city, Butina str., 93 8-914-469-64-44 AO "Breeding factory Zabaikalskiy Krai, Chernyshevskiy area, Komsomolskoe village, Oktober str. 3 [email protected] Тел.:89243788800 "Komsomolets" 30 4 OOO «Bukachachinsky Izvestyank» Zabaykalsky Krai, Chita city, Verkholenskaya str., 4 8(3022) 23-21-54 Zabaykalsky Krai, Alexandrovo-Zavodsky district,. Mankechur village, ul. 5 SZ "Mankechursky" 8(30240)4-62-41 Tsentralnaya 6 OOO "Zabaykalagro" Zabaykalsky Krai, Chita city, Gaidar str., 13 8-914-120-29-18 7 PSK ''Pole'' Zabaykalsky Krai, Priargunsky region, Novotsuruhaytuy, Lazo str., 1 8(30243)30111 8 OOO "Mysovaya" Zabaykalsky Krai, Priargunsky District, Novotsuruhaytuy, Lazo str., 1 8(30243)30111 9 OOO "Urulyungui" Zabaykalsky Krai, Priargunsky District, Dosatuy,Lenin str., 19 B 89245108820 10 OOO "Xin Jiang" Zabaykalsky Krai,Urban-type settlement Priargunsk, Lenin str., 2 8-914-504-53-38 11 PK "Baygulsky" Zabaykalsky Krai, Chernyshevsky District, Baygul, Shkolnaya str., 6 8(3026) 56-51-35 12 ООО "ForceExport" Zabaykalsky Krai, Chita city, Polzunova str. , 30 building, 7 8-924-388-67-74 13 ООО "Eсospectrum" Zabaykalsky Krai, Aginsky district, str. 30 let Pobedi, 11 8-914-461-28-74 [email protected] OOO "Chitinskaya -
Page | 1 April 2016
Student popular science journal №1 (1) «SGC» PAGE | 1 APRIL 2016 №1 (1) Student Popular Аpril, 2016 Science journal Is published since 2016 year SGC state budgetary vocational educational institution of Novosibirsk region “SIBERIAN GEOPHYSICAL COLLEGE” Student popular science journal №1 (1) «SGC» PAGE | 2 APRIL 2016 WORD OF EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Valeria Loginova Hello! We are students of Siberian Geophysical college. We won’t to present our attention our student popular science journal “SGC”. We try to impart the atmosphere of unique magic and an inimitable world, open to people of extraordinary soul. This is a magazine about real people who are passionate their work. The people unusual, active and interesting, extraordinary people looking for adventures, pleasure and thirst for new discoveries. We hope, that our magazine will catch fancy to you On the issue of the magazine worked: Ekaterina Trufanova Dmitry Tretyakov Denis Semkin Valentin Bezdenezhnykh Vladislav Burakov Elizabeth Sladkikh Evgeniy Koshkin Svetlana Cheverda Anna Cherinko Valeria Loginova Sergey Gerasimov Denis Khamitsevich Dasha Gavrilova Student popular science journal №1 (1) «SGC» PAGE | 3 APRIL 2016 IN THIS ISSUE AboutCollege. About professions 4 partnership.Russian geographical society 8 Student of SGC– participant t of russian geographical society 9 Meeting.Traveler Jacek Palkevich 10 Innovations. 12 Innovative solution in geology on base of unmanned aircrafts Interview. Polina Kravtsova 14 Famous people. Obruchev Vladimir Afanasevich 16 Survivalschool. If you get lost -
Kemerovskaya Oblast, Tayga Vacant Industrial Land, Ha
Plot of Land No. 1 (greenfield) Kemerovskaya Oblast, Tayga Vacant industrial land, ha: 6.2 SITE BRIEF: General Information; Location; Contacts Transport accessibility Infrastructure Preferences ______________________________________________________ General Information; Location; Contacts Site characteristics Description 1. Cadastral number 42:33:0104005:34 2. Location Kemerovskaya Oblast, Tayga 3. Location description Taiga, territory of the track maintenance train (north-eastern part of railway sidings) 4. Land use category Residential area 5. Site in brief Undeveloped land; moderate vegetation; smooth and flat relief. Ravine slopes are smooth, rather flat and grass-covered. 6. Type of ownership (private, public, public-private) Municipal entity “Tayginsky Municipal District”; no restrictions 7. Management company or similar (MC) Architecture and Urban Planning Department of Tayginsky Municipal District Administration 8. MC Address (postal, electronic, web-site) 652401, Russia, Kemerovskaya Oblast, Tayga, ul. 40 let Oktiabria, 23 9. MC contact responsible for relations with potential Aleksei V. Kondratiev residents/investors (full name, title, phone number and Head of Architecture and Urban Planning e-mail) Department, Tayginsky Municipal District Administration 1 tel: 8 38448 2-26-99 e-mail: [email protected] 10. Site Development Concept (web-site, if any) (yes/no) No 11. Site business lines (major projects, SME projects, Petroleum refining mixed-type projects) 12. Industry specialization Oil products Transport accessibility Characteristics Current status Projections 1. Distance to the nearest town 61 km to Anzhero-Sudzhensk 61 2. Distance to the regional centre 101 km to Kemerovo 101 3. Distance to Moscow 3565 km 3565 4. Distance to the nearest highway M53 Baikal – 79 km 79 km 5. Any road connecting the Site with the nearest highway: Yes. -
Preparing for the Worst: the Case for Solar Geoengineering Research
Preparing for the Worst: The Case for Solar Geoengineering Research and Oversight 2019 AUGUST 6 Bradie S. Crandall American Institute of Chemical Engineers The Case for Solar Geoengineering Research and Oversight | 1 “The Earth is the only world known so far to harbor life. There is nowhere else, at least in the near future, to which our species could migrate. Visit, yes. Settle, not yet. Like it or not, for the moment the Earth is where we make our stand.” -Carl Sagan The Case for Solar Geoengineering Research and Oversight | 2 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 5 FOREWORD………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 6 About the Author……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 6 About the WISE program…………………………………………………………………………………………. 6 Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 6 Acronyms…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 7 1. INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8 1.1 The Climate Crisis…………….………………………………………………………………………………… 8 1.2 Global Decarbonization Efforts………………………………………………………………………….. 9 1.3 Solar Geoengineering………………………………………………………………………………………… 10 2. BACKGROUND………………………………………………………………………………………………….......... 11 2.1 History………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 11 2.2 Recent Interest…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 11 2.3 Technological Readiness and Feasibility……………………………………………………………… 14 3. KEY CONFLICTS AND CONCERNS………………………………………………………………………………. 16 3.1 Research Echo Chamber…………………………………………………………………………………….. 16 3.2 Research vs Implementation………………………………………………………………………………