DOCSLIB.ORG

Doing Business in Norway Teamwork, Integrity, Quality and Dedication Constitute the Main Platform of Arntzen De Besche Law Firm’S Activities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Doing Business in Norway Teamwork, Integrity, Quality and Dedication Constitute the Main Platform of Arntzen De Besche Law Firm’S Activities Doing business in Norway Teamwork, Integrity, Quality and Dedication constitute the main platform of Arntzen de Besche Law Firm’s activities. These values reflect the firm’s and our employees’ commitment and dedicati- on. Arntzen de Besche consists of 170 unique individuals – which jointly are leading. In addition to its main office in Oslo, Arntzen de Besche is present in Trondheim and Stavanger. We want to be a close partner to private and public stakeholders through goal-oriented collaboration and by using our commercial understanding and sector knowledge to advice our clients. One of the firm’s focus areas is to develop its international operations as part of the internationalization of Norwegian industry and to further assist national authorities in petroleum producing countries globally. We aim to keep the highest ethical standards at all times and it is important to us that each employee is trusted by our clients, other partners and contacts, and the society in general. Copyright @ 2017 Arntzen de Besche Publisher: Arntzen de Besche Design: Idéverkstedet AS Production: Frode Fjellberg AS Photo: canstockphoto.com / thinkstockphotos.com / Adobe Stock Warning and Disclaimer The information in this book is for general information purposes only and does not claim to be comprehensive or provide legal or other advice. Arntzen de Besche Advokat- firma AS accepts no responsibility for loss which may arise from accessing or reliance on information contained in this book. The book is current as of its date of publication and do not necessarily reflect the present law or regulations. The contents of this book are protected by copyright under international conventions. Users are permitted to read the contents and make copies for their own personal use. They may also give copies (in paper or electronic form) of reasonable extracts on an occasional basis free of charge to colleagues and clients for their personal use, on terms that (i) Arntzen de Besche Advokatfirma AS is acknowledged as the source, (ii) the text is not altered in any way and (iii) the attention of recipients is drawn to this Warning and Disclaimer. All other use and copying of any of the contents of this site is prohibited unless the prior written consent of Arntzen de Besche Advokatfirma AS is obtained. ISBN 978-82-990261-7-8 The practice at Arntzen de Besche Law Firm dates back to 1870. Today, our 130 lawyers at the offices in Oslo, Trondheim and Stavanger serve Norwegian and foreign business clients in nearly all fields of the law. We are dedicated to providing advice and expertise at the highest levels, and we have time and again achieved extraordinary results following the distinctive vision of our founders. Client service is the foundation goal of every law firm. Every day of the year, our cohesive team of lawyers focus intensely on solving our clients’ most important problems. Our main objective is to assist our clients in the best possible way. We cannot succeed without continuous work and relentless search for improvements. In our day to day work assisting our clients, we always seek to achieve excellence within the profession, thus helping the clients attain their objectives. By publishing a new edition of Doing Business in Norway we want to give the reader an updated summary of the core elements of Norwegian law. We sincerely hope that this publication will be of interest to companies and individuals contemplating at engaging in business activities in Norway. Although the book covers a number of legal subjects, the intention is limited to providing a brief outline of each area of the law. We hope that you will find this introduction useful and readable. Arntzen de Besche Sven Iver Steen Trond Vernegg Erlend Haaskjold Managing Partner M&A Partner, Editor Litigation Partner, Editor 3 DOING BUSINESS IN NORWAY Svartisen is Norway’s second largest glacier and covers more than 370 square kilometres. The highest point on the glacier rises to 1,595 metres above sea level. The name Svartisen comes from ‘svartis’, or ‘black ice’, an old word used to describe the deep blue colour of the ice and the contrast with the white snow and newer ice on the glacier plateau itself. The lowest part of the glacier is just 20 metres above sea level, making it easily accessible to tourists and glacier walkers. CONTENT INTRODUCTION ..................................................10 INSOLVENCY ........................................................... 54 General ...................................................................................11 General .................................................................................55 FORMS OF DOING BUSINESS ..................13 TAX SYSTEM ..............................................................59 General ................................................................................. 14 General ................................................................................60 Tax administration ..........................................................60 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES ............16 Tax treaties.........................................................................60 Private and public Entities subject to tax ......................................................61 limited liability companies ..............................................17 Rate of tax ..........................................................................62 Incorporation .......................................................................18 Tax losses ............................................................................63 Company capital ..............................................................20 Interest ................................................................................64 Shares and shareholders’ rights ....................................21 The general meeting ........................................................22 PARTICIPATION EXEMPTION .................................... 66 Qualifying investments / COMPANY MANAGEMENT ...........................................25 Shares in limited liability companies ......................... 66 The board of directors .....................................................25 Investments in partnerships General Manager ...............................................................27 and hybrid entities .......................................................... 68 The corporate assembly .................................................28 Investments in securities’ funds ................................. 68 Auditor .................................................................................28 Investments in other equity instruments ................. 69 Representation and signatory power..........................28 Investments in non-equity instruments .................. 69 DISTRIBUTION OF EQUITY ...........................................31 BUSINESS TAXATION ......................................................71 Dividend ...............................................................................31 Depreciation ........................................................................71 Capital reduction ..............................................................32 R&D (Skattefunn)..............................................................73 Merger or demerger ..........................................................32 Tax consolidation ..............................................................74 Repayment following liquidation ................................32 Exit taxes .............................................................................76 Capital increase .................................................................32 Tax residency ......................................................................77 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS ..........................................36 Taxation of non-residents ..............................................78 Convertible loans ..............................................................36 Withholding taxes .............................................................79 Warrants shares .................................................................37 Mergers and reorganisations .........................................95 Warrants ..............................................................................37 CFC regime ........................................................................80 Share capital reduction ...................................................38 TRANSFER PRICING ......................................................83 MERGERS AND DEMERGERS Scope of rules ....................................................................83 BETWEEN LIMITED COMPANIES ..............................40 Documentation ................................................................ 86 Merger ..................................................................................40 Advance Pricing Agreements ....................................... 86 Demerger ............................................................................ 42 SPECIAL TAX REGIMES ................................................. 88 Dissolution and winding-up ......................................... 43 Transfer of license interests .......................................... 88 Board liability ....................................................................44 Refund of tax value of exploration costs .................. 88 PARTNERSHIPS....................................................46 Hydro-electric plants .....................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Norway: Assessment by the EITI International Secretariat
    EITI International Secretariat 15 April 2021 Validation of Requirement 2.5 – Norway: Assessment by the EITI International Secretariat EITI International Secretariat 1 Phone: +47 222 00 800 E-mail: [email protected] Twitter: @EITIorg www.eiti.org Address: Rådhusgata 26, 0151 Oslo, Norway Validation of Requirement 2.5 – Norway Assessment by the EITI International Secretariat Validation of Requirement 2.5 – Norway: Assessment by the EITI International Secretariat Contents 1. Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 2 2. Background ............................................................................................................................................. 2 3. Assessment of Requirement 2.5 on beneficial ownership .................................................................. 4 Annex A: Technical assessment ................................................................................................................ 6 1. Summary The International Secretariat’s assessment is that Norway has made “inadequate progress” in meeting the initial criteria for implementing Requirement 2.5 on beneficial ownership. Norway has enacted legislation to establish a publicly accessible ultimate beneficial ownership (UBO) registry. It will apply to all companies that apply for or hold a participating interest in exploration or production oil, gas or mining licenses. Regulations supplementing the act were subject to public
    [Show full text]
  • Eierskapsmelding 2014
    EIERSKAP SM ELDING Haugfoss kraftstasjon ved Blaafarveværket. Eier er Modum Kraftprod 2014 Inntaksdammen i Ramfoss, Ramfoss Kraftlag Eierskapsmelding, vedtatt i Kommunestyret 20.6.11, sak 51/11. Oppdatert august 2012 (K-sak 70/12), 1 oppdatert august 2013 (K-sak 66/13), sist oppdatert august 2014. Innhold Del I Eierstyring ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Innledning ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.1.1 Bakgrunn for eierskapsmeldingen ................................................................................. 4 1.1.2 Oppbygning av eierskapsmeldingen .............................................................................. 4 1.2 Å eie er å ville, motiver for selskapsdannelse................................................................... 4 1.2.1 Finansielt motivert ......................................................................................................... 5 1.2.2 Politisk motivert ............................................................................................................. 5 1.2.3 Effektivisering................................................................................................................ 5 1.2.4 Samfunnsøkonomisk motivert ....................................................................................... 5 1.2.5 Regionalpolitisk motivert..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Pharology from Google Earth, of a Beautiful Mystery to My Grown up Son and Daughter,Yed and Cristiana Su
    Ancient Pharology from Google earth, of a Beautiful Mystery to my grown up son and daughter,Yed and Cristiana Su The emplacement of some of the most ancient lighthouses known, tentatively explained Beauty and lighthouses Lighthouses are beautiful, more often than not, and, undoubtedly, the seafront context in which we expect to find them is quite inspiring. Arts and literature linger since long time on them, some have become tourist resorts, people even tour dozens of distant lighthouses just to see them, or “collect” them, as notably radio-hams do. Italian radio ham diplomas. WAIL, “worked all Italian lighthouses” Fbook group- one sets up a station, many try to confirm a radio contact Lighthouses' society exist in the anglophone world in particular, often populated not just by passionates, but by former, and now ever more rare figures: present lighthouse wardens. Dr. Trethaway, one of the most noted pharologists, discovered he is the descendant of a lighthouse keeper family as he developed his skills and passion. I am indebted to his site for a number of illustrations here, as well as for a few critical concepts. Today, most lighthouses are unmanned. Chania lighthouse Crete, the base is Venetian, end of XVI century, the tower Egyptian, early XIX. Kjeungskjær lighthouse, Ørland, Norway. Torre de Hercules, Galicia, Spain. A splendid Roman Lighthouse Enoshima, Japan, recently renovated Peggy's Cove, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada Types of Lighthouses and their emplacement A modern lighthouse equivalent uses radio waves rather than light, and is usually quite uncute. Cape Peloro navigational radio beacon, Sicily, Messina straits: ugly.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulatory Reform in Norway
    Regulatory Reform in Norway MARKETISATION OF GOVERNMENT SERVICES – STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES © OECD (2003). All rights reserved. 1 ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention signed in Paris on 14th December 1960, and which came into force on 30th September 1961, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shall promote policies designed: • to achieve the highest sustainable economic growth and employment and a rising standard of living in Member countries, while maintaining financial stability, and thus to contribute to the development of the world economy; • to contribute to sound economic expansion in Member as well as non-member countries in the process of economic development; and • to contribute to the expansion of world trade on a multilateral, non-discriminatory basis in accordance with international obligations. The original Member countries of the OECD are Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The following countries became Members subsequently through accession at the dates indicated hereafter: Japan (28th April 1964), Finland (28th January 1969), Australia (7th June 1971), New Zealand (29th May 1973), Mexico (18th May 1994), the Czech Republic (21st December 1995), Hungary (7th May 1996), Poland (22nd November 1996), Korea (12th December 1996) and the Slovak Republic (14th December 2000). The Commission of the European Communities takes part in the work of the OECD (Article 13 of the OECD Convention). © OECD 2003 Permission to reproduce a portion of this work for non-commercial purposes or classroom use should be obtained through the Centre français d’exploitation du droit de copie (CFC), 20, rue des Grands-Augustins, 75006 Paris, France, tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Lighthouse Bibliography.Pdf
    Title Author Date 10 Lights: The Lighthouses of the Keweenaw Peninsula Keweenaw County Historical Society n.d. 100 Years of British Glass Making Chance Brothers 1924 137 Steps: The Story of St Mary's Lighthouse Whitley Bay North Tyneside Council 1999 1911 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1911 1912 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1912 1913 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1913 1914 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1914 1915 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1915 1916 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1916 1917 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1917 1918 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1918 1919 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1919 1920 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1920 1921 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1921 1922 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1922 1923 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1923 1924 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1924 1925 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1925 1926 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1926 1927 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1927 1928 Report of the Commissioner of
    [Show full text]
  • Norwegian Corporate Accounts
    ARBEIDSNOTAT 15/15 WORKING PAPER NORWEGIAN CORPORATE ACCOUNTS - Documentation and quality assurance of SNF’s and NHH’s database of accounting and company information for Norwegian companies Endre Berner Aksel Mjøs Marius Olving SNF SAMFUNNS- OG NÆRINGSLIVSFORSKNING AS - er et selskap i NHH-miljøet med oppgave å initiere, organisere og utføre ekstern- finansiert forskning. Norges Handelshøyskole og Stiftelsen SNF er aksjonærer. Virksomheten drives med basis i egen stab og fagmiljøene ved NHH. SNF er ett av Norges ledende forskningsmiljø innen anvendt økonomisk administrativ forskning, og har gode samarbeidsrelasjoner til andre forsk-ningsmiljøer i Norge og utlandet. SNF utfører forskning og forsknings baserte utredninger for sentrale beslutningstakere i privat og offentlig sektor. Forskningen organiseres i programmer og prosjekter av langsiktig og mer kortsiktig karakter. Alle publikasjoner er offentlig tilgjengelig. SNF CENTRE FOR APPLIED RESEARCH AT NHH - is a company within the NHH group. Its objective is to initiate, organize and conduct externally financed research. The company shareholders are the Norwegian School of Economics (NHH)and the SNF Foundation. Research is carried out by SNF´s own staff as well as faculty members at NHH. SNF is one of Norway´s leading research environment within applied economic administrative research. It has excellent working relations with other research environments in Norway as well as abroad. SNF conducts research and prepares research-based reports for major decision-makers both in the private and
    [Show full text]
  • Collection Profile Norway
    Euler Hermes Collection Profile Norway Collecting in Norway • The payment behavior of domestic companies is good, with payments made within 30 days on average, and domestic courts are fairly efficient in dealing with disputes in a timely manner. • Having said this, negotiation and compromises are considered as a pre-requisite to legal action and obtaining effective support in this regard is important. • In the event of insolvency, recovering the debt becomes difficult as debt renegotiation schemes are not effective and the priority rules set forth in liquidation proceedings make it unlikely for unsecured creditors to receive any part of the proceeds. Collection complexity Notable High Very High Severe Complexity relating to Notable Severe Payments Court proceedings Insolvency proceedings Contents General Information ........................................................................................................................................3 Availability of financial information ................................................................................................................3 Main corporate structures ...............................................................................................................................3 Regulatory environment ..................................................................................................................................3 Getting Paid ........................................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Rettledning Til RF-1215 Selskapsmelding for Selskap Med Deltakerfastsetting 2016 Fastsatt Av Skattedirektoratet
    Rettledning til RF-1215 Selskapsmelding for selskap med deltakerfastsetting 2016 Fastsatt av Skattedirektoratet Selskap med deltakerfastsetting etter Selskapet kan søke om utsettelse hvis det Særlig om bruken av skatteloven § 10-40, skal levere er svært vanskelig å levere innen fristen. fortegn i skjema selskapsmelding (RF-1215). Selskapet skal ikke lenger ha fastsetting Deltakerfastsetting gjennom føres når etter nettometoden for selskap med Hovedregel en økonomisk virksomhet utøves for to deltakerfastsetting dersom det bare har to I utgangspunktet skal alle tall innrap- eller flere deltakeres felles regning og deltakere og disse inngår ekteskap eller porteres uten fortegn når det klart fremgår risiko, og minst en av deltakerne har et registrert partnerskap med hverandre. av ledeteksten om tallet skal tillegges eller ubegrenset ansvar for virksomhetens Tilsvarende gjelder dersom deltakerne er trekkes fra i forhold til den sammenheng samlede forpliktelser. meldepliktige samboere iht. det føres inn i. Det skal altså ikke brukes Selskapsmelding pliktes derfor utfylt folketrygdloven § 25-4 første ledd første minustegn når teksten forteller at det for: punktum. Har ikke selskapet andre dreier seg om kostnader, underskudd, deltakere skal foretakets skattefastsetting mv., og tilsvarende ingen plusstegn ved - ansvarlig selskap med solidarisk skje på samme måte som for inntekter, overskudd mv. Et unntak fra ansvar (ANS), enkeltpersonforetak fra og med dette kan illustreres ved følgende - ansvarlig selskap med proratarisk inntektsåret de to deltakerne fastsettes eksempel: (delt) ansvar (DA), under ett, dvs. særskilt fastsetting i - indre selskap, skatteklasse 1E eller felles fastsetting i En utleieaktivitet har i inntektsåret gitt - kommandittselskap (KS), skatteklasse 2 eller 2F. Foretaket leverer i større kostnader enn inntekter: - partrederi (PR), og så fall ikke lenger selskapsmelding.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Uarctic's Legal Status
    The following text on the purpose and status of the legal review of UArctic was shared with UArctic members for the 2018 Council meeting. Assessment and Review of the University of the Arctic’s Legal Status Task Force At the meeting in Québec City in December 2017, the members of UArctic’s Board of Governors agreed that for the purpose of contractual capacity, fundraising and liability, an evaluation of our legal basis was warranted. Thus, the Board agreed to create a Task Force to coordinate the evaluation. The members of the Task Force are Board members Frederik Paulsen (Task Force Chair), Jouko Niinimäki and Brian Rogers (Board Chair), and UArctic President Lars Kullerud. The Task Force, through its Chair, is to report on their findings in time for the Board meeting in December 2018 in Hanover, USA where the board may decide to recommend some changes to our legal status to the Council of UArctic. Aim & Limitations The aim of this work is to identify solutions that can help UArctic have a stronger position when it comes to contractual capacity, fundraising and liability. Any solutions finally recommended must ensure that UArctic as a membership organization shall remain as we know it today. This includes maintaining our mission, vision and values, types of membership, governance structure, etc. The tradition of keeping the majority of UArctic operations hosted by our members shall also be maintained. We hope to find a solution that enables UArctic to become a trusted, worthy recipient for donations, and that is, or has, a legal entity with the ability to deal with liabilities that do not alter any important aspect of the network.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapport Om Eierskap Og Organisering Av Eiendomsforvaltning I Kommunesektoren
    Rapport om eierskap og organisering av eiendomsforvaltning i kommunesektoren Utarbeidet for KoBE av spesialrådgiver Helge Rohn, Reinertsen AS 1 Contents I. INNLEDNING ............................................................................................................................. 6 II. EIERSKAPET ............................................................................................................................... 7 1. Eierens rolle og ansvar .................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Generelt om ansvaret ..................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Eierskapets kjerne ........................................................................................................... 7 1.3 Kriterier for måling av godt eierskap i offentlig sektor ................................................... 7 1.4 Alternative relasjoner mellom rollene i eiendomsforvaltning ....................................... 8 1.5 De tre eierrollene ............................................................................................................ 9 1.5.1 Generelt ...................................................................................................................... 9 1.5.2 Eierrollen i forhold til brukervirksomhetene (relatert til arealbehov og –bruk) ....... 9 1.5.3 Eierrollen i forhold til byggene ................................................................................. 10 1.5.4 Eierrollen i
    [Show full text]
  • Ann-Kristin Hansson Bedrifts- Og Foretaksregisteret Regler Og Rutiner for Ajourhold Av
    2007/2 Notater Returadresse: Statistisk sentralbyrå B NO-2225 Kongsvinger Ann-Kristin Hansson Statistisk sentralbyrå Bedrifts- og foretaksregisteret Oslo: Regler og rutiner for ajourhold av Postboks 8131 Dep BoF NO-0033 Oslo Telefon: 21 09 00 00 Telefaks: 21 09 49 73 Kongsvinger: Notater NO-2225 Kongsvinger Telefon: 62 88 50 00 Telefaks: 62 88 50 30 E-post: [email protected] Internett: www.ssb.no ISSN 0806-3745 Statistisk sentralbyrå Statistics Norway Avdeling for næringsstatistikk/Seksjon for bedriftsregister FORORD.................................................................................................................... 5 1. DET SENTRALE BEDRIFTS- OG FORETAKSREGISTERET .............................. 5 1.1. Formål og innhold.......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1.1. Formål....................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1.2. Innhold og omfang.................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2. Enhetsdefinisjoner ......................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.1. Foretak...................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.2. Bedrift og andre underenheter,
    [Show full text]
  • Masterthesis.PDF (1.078Mb)
    Norwegian School of Economics Bergen, Fall 2017 Charities And Foundations In Norway A Legal And Financial Framework With Focus On The Olav Thon Foundation Torstein Sandaa-Johansen & Madina Kairova Supervisor: Guttorm Schjelderup Master thesis in financial economics NORWEGIAN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS This thesis was written as a part of the Master of Science in Economics and Business Administration at NHH. Please note that neither the institution nor the examiners are responsible − through the approval of this thesis − for the theories and methods used, or results and conclusions drawn in this work. 2 Abstract This paper seeks to examine the history and usage of charities and foundations in Norway. The number of large foundations has been on the rise, along with the interest in the charitable sector. In its purity a philanthropic venture, the borderline philanthropic motivation behind some charity has been questioned because of the tax savings connected to using the organizational form foundation. Specifically, the case of the Olav Thon Foundation’s massive tax savings compared to the taxation of Olav Thon as a private individual has been used as an example. What is the impact of the increased use of charity through foundations on the Norwegian society? This paper examines the existing legal regulation and tax legislation on foundations and charity, to analyse how the Norwegian tax and legal system is equipped to handle the increased use of charity through foundations. What are the shortcomings and what are the potential sources of misuse? The examination has been done both by establishing a historic and theoretical background and a legal and taxational framework, and through analysing a relevant case in the transfer of the Olav Thon Group and much of Olav Thon’s private fortune to the Olav Thon Foundation.
    [Show full text]