FITZGERALD BIOSPHERE Threatened Species Profiles
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Inventory of Taxa for the Fitzgerald River National Park
Flora Survey of the Coastal Catchments and Ranges of the Fitzgerald River National Park 2013 Damien Rathbone Department of Environment and Conservation, South Coast Region, 120 Albany Hwy, Albany, 6330. USE OF THIS REPORT Information used in this report may be copied or reproduced for study, research or educational purposed, subject to inclusion of acknowledgement of the source. DISCLAIMER The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information used. However, the author and participating bodies take no responsibiliy for how this informrion is used subsequently by other and accepts no liability for a third parties use or reliance upon this report. CITATION Rathbone, DA. (2013) Flora Survey of the Coastal Catchments and Ranges of the Fitzgerald River National Park. Unpublished report. Department of Environment and Conservation, Western Australia. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author would like to thank many people that provided valable assistance and input into the project. Sarah Barrett, Anita Barnett, Karen Rusten, Deon Utber, Sarah Comer, Charlotte Mueller, Jason Peters, Roger Cunningham, Chris Rathbone, Carol Ebbett and Janet Newell provided assisstance with fieldwork. Carol Wilkins, Rachel Meissner, Juliet Wege, Barbara Rye, Mike Hislop, Cate Tauss, Rob Davis, Greg Keighery, Nathan McQuoid and Marco Rossetto assissted with plant identification. Coralie Hortin, Karin Baker and many other members of the Albany Wildflower society helped with vouchering of plant specimens. 2 Contents Abstract .............................................................................................................................. -
Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project
Submission to Senate Inquiry: Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project: Potential Impacts on Matters of National Environmental Significance within Modelled Oil Spill Impact Areas (Summer and Winter 2A Model Scenarios) Prepared by Dr David Ellis (BSc Hons PhD; Ecologist, Environmental Consultant and Founder at Stepping Stones Ecological Services) March 27, 2016 Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 4 Summer Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................. 5 Winter Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................... 7 Threatened Species Conservation Status Summary ........................................... 8 International Migratory Bird Agreements ............................................................. 8 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 11 Methods .................................................................................................................... 12 Protected Matters Search Tool Database Search and Criteria for Oil-Spill Model Selection ............................................................................................................. 12 Criteria for Inclusion/Exclusion of Threatened, Migratory and Marine -
Recovery Team Annual Report Threatened Species
RECOVERY TEAM ANNUAL REPORT THREATENED SPECIES AND/OR COMMUNITIES RECOVERY TEAM PROGRAM INFORMATION Recovery Team Albany District Threatened Flora Recovery Team Reporting Period Calendar year 2010 Current membership Member Representing 1. Chair Sarah Comer DEC 2. Exec Officer Sarah Barrett DEC 3. Linda Strahan Albany Wildflower Society 4 Libby Sandiford Albany Wildflower Society 5. John Tucker Ravensthorpe Wildflower Society 6 Margaret Pieroni Community member 7 Merle Bennett Ravensthorpe Wildflower Society 8 Andrew Brown DEC 9 Dave Coates DEC 10 Anne Cochrane DEC 11 Sue Oborne Ongerup Wildflower Society 12 Meredith Spencer DEC 13 Greg Freebury DEC 14 Sylvia Leighton DEC Dates meetings were held 26/5/10; 1/12/10 One to two paragraph Recovery of critically endangered Stirling Range Taxa threatened by Phytophthora summary of achievements dieback has progressed through phosphite application, herbivore (vertebrate and suitable for WATSNU invertebrate) control, concerted efforts to collect seed from remote and ‘difficult’ species and translocations of four species. List of actions undertaken by Recovery Team Action 1 Phosphite application Aerial phosphite was applied to 22 DRF in 38 targets, 340 ha in total. New targets were established for Leucopogon gnaphalioides CR Mondurup, Daviesia ovata CR Manypeaks and Lambertia fairallii, SRNP. Action 2 Herbivore protection Aerial baiting of 25 ha on Bluff Knoll with 1080 oats to protect Banksia montana, Persoonia micranthera, Leucopogon gnaphalioides, Latrobea colophona Caging/ fencing was undertaken for CR taxa Banksia montana, Acacia awestoniana and Daviesia ovata, New monitoring (for grazing impacts) was established for Darwinia collina CR on Bluff Knoll Action 3 Monitoring Fire ecology Fire succession quadrats (22 quadrats) were established for 8 DRF (Verticordia pityhrops, Kunzea similis ssp similis, Adenanthos ellipticus, Ricinocarpus trichophorus, Myoporum cordifolium, Verticordia crebra, Adenanthos dobagii and Eucalyptus nutans) in the Fitzgerald River National Park and fire management guidelines recommended. -
The Vegetation of the Fitzgerald River National Park, Western Australia
Kingia1@); 141-153 (1990) 141 The vegetation of the Fitzgerald River National Park, Western Australia T.E.H. Aplint and K.R. Newbey2' I Westem AusrralianHerbarium, Deparrnenr ofConservarion and tjnd Management, P.O. Box 104, C,omo,Wesrem AusEalia 5152 Pres€nr addrcss: 87 Clydatlale Stre€r, Como, Wesrem Australia 6152. '?Cl- Westem Ausralian Herbarium, D€parrment ofconseFarion and Land Managemed, P.O. Box 104. Como. Westem Australia 6152. Abstract Aplin, T.E.H. ad Newbey, KR The vegetaticn of dre Fitzgenld River National Paft, Weslern Austalia- Kingia 1(2): 141-153 (1990). A vegetation map of lhe Fitzgerald River National Part which accompanie,sthis psper shows 12 major plant corrmmities. A kiefaccount ofeadr ofthesedan| corftnmities d,epicledin fiatmap is provided The vegeration fornatims ngefrom woodlard ro heath, with the pedominxrt fomation being lal shflblard. Not€s on t}le physical environment are also includei. Introduction TheFitzgeraldRiverNationalPark(Park) ,of244,677 ba,]nesjn the central sourl coastofWesrem Australia, betwe€ndte towns of Bremer Bay and Hopetounalong the coastand Jenamungupand "C" Ravensthorpeinland (Figure 1). The Park was gazetteda classreserve for tie preservationof "A" flora and faunain 1954,and in 1973was madean classreserve and vestedin the National parks Authority of Westem Australia. It is registeredas an Intemational BiosphereReserve with the United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultuml Organization, the frst to be so approved in WestemAustralia. In 1970 a botanical survey w:ls conductedby the Westem Australian Herbarium !o obtain an assessmentof the botanicalresources in the Park. The vegetationmap which accompaniesthis paper was compiledby Aplin in the courseof that survey. Sincethen Newbey (1979) undertook a study of the vegetationof the central southcoastal region and someof his results havebeen incorporated in this paper. -
25 September 1987] GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, WA 3733
25 September 1987] GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, WA 3733 WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ACT 1950 Conostylis drummondii 019882F3705 . Conostylis lepidospermoides. Pursuant to the provisions of subsection (2) of section 23F Conostylis misera . of the Wildlife Conservation Act 1950, I hereby declare that Conostylis micrantha. protected flora of the taxa listed in the schedule to this notice growing in its original state and not in its Conostylis rogeri. domesticated or cultivated state are rare flora throughout Conostylis seorsiflora subsp. trichophylla. the whole of the State . Conostylis wonganensis. The previous Notice relating to rare flora published in the Coopernookia georgei. Government Gazette on 12 March 1982 is hereby cancelled. Corybas sp . (Albany) L . Byrne 10 . BARRY HODGE, Minister for Conservation Darwinia acerosa. and Land Management. Darwinia apiculata . Darwinia cornea. Darwinia collina. Schedule Darwinia macrostegia . Acacia anomala . Darwinia masonii. Acacia aphyl a . Darwinia meeboldii. Acacia argutifolia . Darwinia oxylepis. Acacia denticulosa . Darwinia squarrosa. Acacia depressa . Darwinia wittwerorum . Acacia guinetii . Darwinia sp. (Scott River G. J . Keighery 3582 . Acacia merrickae. Darwinia sp. (Stirling Range) G . J . Keighery 5732. Acacia pharangites. Daviesia euphorbioides. Acacia semicircinalis . Daviesia microphylla. Acacia simulans . Daviesia purpurascens. Acacia vassalii. Daviesia spiralis Acacia sp . (Chiddarcooping) J. Brown 59 & A . Williams . Daviesia sp . Acacia sp . (Wongan Hills) K. F (Three Springs) M . D. Crisp 6480. Kenneally 7496. Daviesia sp . Adenanthos cunninghamii (central wheatbelt) M. D. Crisp 6612. Daviesia sp . Adenanthos dobagii . (Ravensthorpe) M . D . Crisp 6065 . Daviesia sp . (Norseman) M Adenanthos ellipticus. D . Crisp 5943. Daviesia sp . (Stirling Range) K Adenanthos eyrei. R. Newbey 5113 . Daviesia sp. (Eneabba) S Adenanthos deticos . D. Hopper 4829. Diuris drummondii. Adenanthos pungens . -
Myrtle Rust Reviewed the Impacts of the Invasive Plant Pathogen Austropuccinia Psidii on the Australian Environment R
Myrtle Rust reviewed The impacts of the invasive plant pathogen Austropuccinia psidii on the Australian environment R. O. Makinson 2018 DRAFT CRCPLANTbiosecurity CRCPLANTbiosecurity © Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre, 2018 ‘Myrtle Rust reviewed: the impacts of the invasive pathogen Austropuccinia psidii on the Australian environment’ is licenced by the Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Australia licence. For licence conditions see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This Review provides background for the public consultation document ‘Myrtle Rust in Australia – a draft Action Plan’ available at www.apbsf.org.au Author contact details R.O. Makinson1,2 [email protected] 1Bob Makinson Consulting ABN 67 656 298 911 2The Australian Network for Plant Conservation Inc. Cite this publication as: Makinson RO (2018) Myrtle Rust reviewed: the impacts of the invasive pathogen Austropuccinia psidii on the Australian environment. Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre, Canberra. Front cover: Top: Spotted Gum (Corymbia maculata) infected with Myrtle Rust in glasshouse screening program, Geoff Pegg. Bottom: Melaleuca quinquenervia infected with Myrtle Rust, north-east NSW, Peter Entwistle This project was jointly funded through the Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre and the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Program. The Plant Biosecurity CRC is established and supported under the Australian Government Cooperative Research Centres Program. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This review of the environmental impacts of Myrtle Rust in Australia is accompanied by an adjunct document, Myrtle Rust in Australia – a draft Action Plan. The Action Plan was developed in 2018 in consultation with experts, stakeholders and the public. The intent of the draft Action Plan is to provide a guiding framework for a specifically environmental dimension to Australia’s response to Myrtle Rust – that is, the conservation of native biodiversity at risk. -
Ecology of Pyrmont Peninsula 1788 - 2008
Transformations: Ecology of Pyrmont peninsula 1788 - 2008 John Broadbent Transformations: Ecology of Pyrmont peninsula 1788 - 2008 John Broadbent Sydney, 2010. Ecology of Pyrmont peninsula iii Executive summary City Council’s ‘Sustainable Sydney 2030’ initiative ‘is a vision for the sustainable development of the City for the next 20 years and beyond’. It has a largely anthropocentric basis, that is ‘viewing and interpreting everything in terms of human experience and values’(Macquarie Dictionary, 2005). The perspective taken here is that Council’s initiative, vital though it is, should be underpinned by an ecocentric ethic to succeed. This latter was defined by Aldo Leopold in 1949, 60 years ago, as ‘a philosophy that recognizes[sic] that the ecosphere, rather than any individual organism[notably humans] is the source and support of all life and as such advises a holistic and eco-centric approach to government, industry, and individual’(http://dictionary.babylon.com). Some relevant considerations are set out in Part 1: General Introduction. In this report, Pyrmont peninsula - that is the communities of Pyrmont and Ultimo – is considered as a microcosm of the City of Sydney, indeed of urban areas globally. An extensive series of early views of the peninsula are presented to help the reader better visualise this place as it was early in European settlement (Part 2: Early views of Pyrmont peninsula). The physical geography of Pyrmont peninsula has been transformed since European settlement, and Part 3: Physical geography of Pyrmont peninsula describes the geology, soils, topography, shoreline and drainage as they would most likely have appeared to the first Europeans to set foot there. -
Western Australian Natives Susceptible to Phytophthora Cinnamomi
Western Australian natives susceptible to Phytophthora cinnamomi. Compiled by E. Groves, G. Hardy & J. McComb, Murdoch University Information used to determine resistance to P. cinnamomi : 1a- field observations, 1b- field observation and recovery of P.cinnamomi; 2a- glasshouse inoculation of P. cinnamomi and recovery, 2b- field inoculation with P. cinnamomi and recovery. Not Provided- no information was provided from the reference. PLANT SPECIES COMMON NAME ASSESSMENT RARE NURSERY REFERENCES SPECIES AVALABILITY Acacia campylophylla Benth. 1b 15 Acacia myrtifolia (Sm.) Willd. 1b A 9 Acacia stenoptera Benth. Narrow Winged 1b 16 Wattle Actinostrobus pyramidalis Miq. Swamp Cypress 2a 17 Adenanthos barbiger Lindl. 1a A 1, 13, 16 Adenanthos cumminghamii Meisn. Albany Woolly Bush NP A 4, 8 Adenanthos cuneatus Labill. Coastal Jugflower 1a A 1, 6 Adenanthos cygnorum Diels. Common Woolly Bush 2 1, 7 Adenanthos detmoldii F. Muell. Scott River Jugflower 1a 1 Adenanthos dobagii E.C. Nelson Fitzgerald Jugflower NP R 4,8 Adenanthos ellipticus A.S. George Oval Leafed NP 8 Adenanthos Adenanthos filifolius Benth. 1a 19 Adenanthos ileticos E.C. George Club Leafed NP 8 Adenanthos Adenanthos meisneri Lehm. 1a A 1 Adenanthos obovatus Labill. Basket Flower 1b A 1, 7 14,16 Adenanthos oreophilus E.C. Nelson 1a 19 Adenanthos pungens ssp. effusus Spiky Adenanthos NP R 4 Adenanthos pungens ssp. pungens NP R 4 Adenanthos sericeus Labill. Woolly Bush 1a A 1 Agonis linearifolia (DC.) Sweet Swamp Peppermint 1b 6 Taxandria linearifolia (DC.) J.R Wheeler & N.G Merchant Agrostocrinum scabrum (R.Br) Baill. Bluegrass 1 12 Allocasuarina fraseriana (Miq.) L.A.S. Sheoak 1b A 1, 6, 14 Johnson Allocasuarina humilis (Otto & F. -
GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, WA [28 November 1997
GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, WA [28 November 1997 WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ACT 1950 WILDLIFE CONSERVATION (RARE FLORA) NOTICE 1997 Made by the Minister under section 23F of the Act. Citation 1. This order may be cited as the Wildlife Conservation (Rare Flora) Notice 1997. Interpretation 2. In this notice - "extant" means known to be living in a wild state; "protected flora" means any flora belonging to the classes of flora declared by the Minister under section 6 of the Act to be protected flora by notice published in Gazette 9 October 1987, p. 3855; "taxon" includes any taxon that is described by a genus name or any other name or description. Note: The plural form of "taxon" is "taxa". Rare flora 3. Subject to clause 4, protected flora - (a) specified in Schedule 1, being taxa that are extant and considered likely to become extinct or rare and therefore in need of special protection; and (b) specified in Schedule 2, being taxa that are presumed to be extinct in the wild and therefore in need of special protection, are declared to be rare flora for the purposes of section 23F of the Act throughout the State. Application 4. Clause 3 does not apply to those plants of a taxon of protected flora specified in Schedule 1 or 2 that have been planted for any purpose other than such plants that have been planted for the purpose of conservation of that taxon and in accordance with approval given by the Executive Director. Revocation 5. The Wildlife Conservation (Rare Flora) Notice 1996 is revoked. SCHEDULE l - EXTANT TAXA [Clause 3 (a)] Division 1 - Spermatophyfa (floweringplant%, conifers and cycadd 1. -
Latrobea Colophona Interim Recovery Plan No
INTERIM RECOVERY PLAN NO. 301 Latrobea colophona INTERIM RECOVERY PLAN 2010-2015 June 2010 Department of Environment and Conservation Kensington Interim Recovery Plan for Latrobea colophona FOREWORD Interim Recovery Plans (IRPs) are developed within the framework laid down in Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM) Policy Statements Nos. 44 and 50. Note: CALM formally became the Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) in July 2006. DEC will continue to adhere to these Policy Statements until they are revised and reissued. IRPs outline the recovery actions that are required to urgently address those threatening processes most affecting the ongoing survival of threatened taxa or ecological communities, and begin the recovery process. DEC is committed to ensuring that Threatened taxa are conserved through the preparation and implementation of IRPs and by ensuring that conservation action commences as soon as possible and, in the case of Critically Endangered (CR) taxa, always within one year of endorsement of that rank by the Minister. This IRP, which was prepared using Specific Nature Conservation Project funding, will operate from June 2010 to May 2015 but will remain in force until withdrawn or replaced. It is intended that, if the species is still ranked as Critically Endangered (CR), this IRP will be reviewed after five years and the need for further recovery actions assessed. This IRP was given regional approval in June 2010 and was approved by the Director of Nature Conservation in July 2010. The provision of funds identified in this IRP is dependent on budgetary and other constraints affecting DEC, as well as the need to address other priorities. -
Rangelands, Western Australia
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations. -
Annual Report 2008-2009 Annual Report
Department of Environment and Conservation and Environment of Department Department of Environment and Conservation 2008-2009 Annual Report 2008-2009 Annual Report Annual 2008-2009 2009195 E R N M O V E G N T E O H T F W A E I S L T A E R R N A U S T Acknowledgments This report was prepared by the Corporate Communications Branch, Department of Environment and Conservation. For more information contact: Department of Environment and Conservation Level 4 The Atrium 168 St Georges Terrace Perth WA 6000 Locked Bag 104 Bentley Delivery Centre Western Australia 6983 Telephone (08) 6364 6500 Facsimile (08) 6364 6520 Recommended reference The recommended reference for this publication is: Department of Environment and Conservation 2008–2009 Annual Report, Department of Environment and Conservation, 2009. We welcome your feedback A publication feedback form can be found at the back of this publication, or online at www.dec.wa.gov.au. ISSN 1835-1131 (Print) ISSN 1835-114X (Online) 8 September 2009 Letter to THE MINISter Back Contents Forward Hon Donna Faragher MLC Minister for Environment In accordance with section 63 of the Financial Management Act 2006, I have pleasure in submitting for presentation to Parliament the Annual Report of the Department of Environment and Conservation for the period 1 July 2008 to 30 June 2009. This report has been prepared in accordance with provisions of the Financial Management Act 2006. Keiran McNamara Director General DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION 2008–2009 ANNUAL REPORT 3 DIRECTOR GENERAL’S FOREWORD Back Contents Forward This is the third annual report of the Department of Environment and Conservation since it was created through the merger of the former Department of Environment and Department of Conservation and Land Management.